You keep saying a "decision made by men" yet you are incorrect. The "decision" was brought about by heresies being brought up and the Nicean council "hammered" out, as you put it, what the Bible actually says about the subject. All of those statements are supported by the Bible and not "decision made by men". If you are going to argue your point at least know the subject. The whole book of John speaks to the deity of Christ (not to mention other books in the NT). The Bible specifically says that Jesus "knew no sin" so that he could be the perfect sacrifice.
Um, no. Not for about 750 years or so. You are confusing Muslims with Christians again. Muslims STILL murder people because they aren't Muslims. Christians haven't for 700-900 years and I would argue that they weren't really "Christians".
Yes he he did turn water into wine. So? The Bible also very specifically tells you "be not DRUNK with wine" and in the context of that passage it means you should not be "out of control" but allow the spirit to have control. That can certainly be extended to pot. So, please do not try some half-assed argument about it being "okay" with Jesus becuase it CLEARLY is not. You clearly do NOT know what you are talking about.
You mean besides it being against what Jesus would have wanted? Just bad spelling then.
Re:Perl Out, Ruby In - Thank God
on
The Ruby Way
·
· Score: 0
You have messy Perl scripts because YOU made messy Perl scripts. Perl didn't do that. I happen to write clean Perl code that I can read 6 months from now thank you. Don't blame the language for your shortcomings.
Re:Perl Out, Ruby In - Thank God
on
The Ruby Way
·
· Score: 0
Migrate to Ruby because it is the slowest of them all? Because its threading model sucks? Oh, migrate because of Rails. I tried Rails on a "legacy" Oracle database. Man does Rails suck at that.
* Wild Level: Low * Number of Infections: 0 - 49 * Number of Sites: 0 - 2 * Geographical Distribution: Low * Threat Containment: Easy * Removal: Easy
Damage
* Damage Level: Low * Modifies Files: Appends itself to files in the current directory on the compromised computer.
Distribution
* Distribution Level: Low
And here is my more accurate re-write:
Threat Assesment Wild
* Wild Level: None * Number of Infections: 0 * Number of Sites: 0 * Geographical Distribution: None * Threat Containment: There is no threat * Removal: See "Threat Containment"
Damage
* Damage Level: Low * Modifies Files: Appends itself to files in the current directory on the compromised computer.
Distribution
* Distribution Level: None
I do not believe OSX is invulnerable but come on. Even I could come up with a "proof of concept" virus. I guess they have to do something to sell their product.
You don't get it at all! If you don't make them move into the.xxx domain and off the others, all you have done is created another domain for them to propagate into. It was a stupid idea.
You just do not get it. That is a totally different scenario and would not be considered libel because you believed it to be true and you experienced it. That is totally different than posting information about someone with the intent to "harm".
Claiming negligent supervision over the kids' use of the internet.... that creates an incredibly high burden for any parent.
No it doesn't. That is your job as a parent. I monitor my kids usage. I have blockers up for sites that "I" deem inappropriate. I look at logs etc. When they get older, "they" can make those determinations. Parents have responsibilities and they need to own up to them.
Then what church do you go to? Christ certainly did not rebel against RELIGION, just the Pharisees take on it. There are still rules you need to live by to be a Christian and one of those is associating with those of like beliefs (i.e. church). The new testament IS secondarily all about the local NT church and what it is, how it should act, what it should do and what it should believe. Baptist (or any name) is simply how you filter that information. You can BE a Baptist without belonging TO a "denomination". I don't belong to the Sounthern Baptist Convention but I am a independent fundamental Baptist because I believe the Baptist beliefs are what the Bible talks about. However, my creed is Christ!
Slashdot Mirror
You keep saying a "decision made by men" yet you are incorrect. The "decision" was brought about by heresies being brought up and the Nicean council "hammered" out, as you put it, what the Bible actually says about the subject. All of those statements are supported by the Bible and not "decision made by men". If you are going to argue your point at least know the subject. The whole book of John speaks to the deity of Christ (not to mention other books in the NT). The Bible specifically says that Jesus "knew no sin" so that he could be the perfect sacrifice.
I would say that the Crusades were not "Christian". The Crusades were antithetical to every Christian belief I can think of.
If his faith is all is he is defending, then I would agree with that.
The whole Bible is NOT metaphorical.
Um, no. Not for about 750 years or so. You are confusing Muslims with Christians again. Muslims STILL murder people because they aren't Muslims. Christians haven't for 700-900 years and I would argue that they weren't really "Christians".
Please, you are an idiot.
Yes he he did turn water into wine. So? The Bible also very specifically tells you "be not DRUNK with wine" and in the context of that passage it means you should not be "out of control" but allow the spirit to have control. That can certainly be extended to pot. So, please do not try some half-assed argument about it being "okay" with Jesus becuase it CLEARLY is not. You clearly do NOT know what you are talking about.
You mean besides it being against what Jesus would have wanted? Just bad spelling then.
You have messy Perl scripts because YOU made messy Perl scripts. Perl didn't do that. I happen to write clean Perl code that I can read 6 months from now thank you. Don't blame the language for your shortcomings.
Migrate to Ruby because it is the slowest of them all? Because its threading model sucks? Oh, migrate because of Rails. I tried Rails on a "legacy" Oracle database. Man does Rails suck at that.
And here is my more accurate re-write:
I do not believe OSX is invulnerable but come on. Even I could come up with a "proof of concept" virus. I guess they have to do something to sell their product.
You don't get it at all! If you don't make them move into the .xxx domain and off the others, all you have done is created another domain for them to propagate into. It was a stupid idea.
Let the bashing begin...oh wait it already has.
You just do not get it. That is a totally different scenario and would not be considered libel because you believed it to be true and you experienced it. That is totally different than posting information about someone with the intent to "harm".
Claiming negligent supervision over the kids' use of the internet.... that creates an incredibly high burden for any parent.
No it doesn't. That is your job as a parent. I monitor my kids usage. I have blockers up for sites that "I" deem inappropriate. I look at logs etc. When they get older, "they" can make those determinations. Parents have responsibilities and they need to own up to them.
Every parent that raises a child instills a "belief" system in the child. No exceptions.
Hey! Don't forget to send Kerry, Pelosi, Gore, and the Clintons.
I don't know if that is any worse than you actually buying into that line.
Is it because you are stupid?
Are we lumping Jr and Sr together now? That is really stupid considering the facts involved.
He doesn't have to make the kernel GPL3. He can stay at GPL2.
That is exactly what God said you would say. Imagine that.
Guessing as usual...!
This was hilarious! http://www.atomfilms.com/sw/content/anakin_dynamit e
Then what church do you go to? Christ certainly did not rebel against RELIGION, just the Pharisees take on it. There are still rules you need to live by to be a Christian and one of those is associating with those of like beliefs (i.e. church). The new testament IS secondarily all about the local NT church and what it is, how it should act, what it should do and what it should believe. Baptist (or any name) is simply how you filter that information. You can BE a Baptist without belonging TO a "denomination". I don't belong to the Sounthern Baptist Convention but I am a independent fundamental Baptist because I believe the Baptist beliefs are what the Bible talks about. However, my creed is Christ!