people never wanted to read the documents, they always wanted to discuss/question/argue. This is why Usenet newsgroups still survives in age of web pages. Wikipedia has similar thing called reference desk. This is a good solution from Wikipedia, but Wikipedia search sucks. It would be better, If you could access question directly (of course "_" between words, blah_blah_blah), than Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2006_N ovember_30#blah_blah_blah
Somewhere, I read about the event that happened in china. That article also stated that those books (thoughts) came out later in some other name/form. Some works are beyond destruction (say, E = mc^2). To avoid the loss, all information (data and knowledge) can be transformed to as simple as possible (wisdom).
This is not the only thing we lost, but there are many more things (Medicines, etc.). I am afraid, nowadays we are not intelligent enough to find those things. Do you thing Multi-core Tera-flop processors can equal those things? no. never.
I always wondered, why it is userid and password in two separate fields? Why not "Userid\password", or "userid+password" or something else in same field. I don't see any difference between hitting tab and "\", or "+".
Online evolvable questions and answers, wouldn't that be a great idea?! Users can be allowed to question, answer, group, categorize, and tag. Users could find related questions and other variants, together and don't see any licenses associated with this. Will it be, wikianswers?!:)
Sure, it will.
Upper class + Upper class = Mostly upper class (common)
Underclass + Underclass = Mostly underclass (common)
Upper class + Underclass = upper class / underclass (rare)
Underclass + Upper class = underclass / upper class (rare)
> The law will supposedly protect people from unwarranted hackers or virus attacks and can fine individuals up to $1M who are found guilty of breaking into a computer without the owners knowledge. At the same time, it also allows some of the better known capable companies to 'look' into your computer for possible virus/spyware and fix the problem without informing you. And, while these friends are doing their job, they can also take the moment to do other things.
what about unwarranted hackers or virus that look into your computer for possible fix of the better known capable companies and harm you?!
Don't know why we are looking for water and air. Wouldn't it be possible for X (life?) Y (live?) without these things. Isnt it we (life on earth) adapted ourselves to consume these things air, water, air-in-water, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
Could it complete "sleep 1" any sooner? no? sigh.
Unidentified Glowing Object?!
people never wanted to read the documents, they always wanted to discuss/question/argue. This is why Usenet newsgroups still survives in age of web pages. Wikipedia has similar thing called reference desk. This is a good solution from Wikipedia, but Wikipedia search sucks. It would be better, If you could access question directly (of course "_" between words, blah_blah_blah), than Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2006_N ovember_30#blah_blah_blah
substituting 9% of the silicon atoms with boron atoms, ...That means doping boron, not silicon.
Somewhere, I read about the event that happened in china. That article also stated that those books (thoughts) came out later in some other name/form. Some works are beyond destruction (say, E = mc^2). To avoid the loss, all information (data and knowledge) can be transformed to as simple as possible (wisdom).
This is not the only thing we lost, but there are many more things (Medicines, etc.). I am afraid, nowadays we are not intelligent enough to find those things. Do you thing Multi-core Tera-flop processors can equal those things? no. never.
I always wondered, why it is userid and password in two separate fields? Why not "Userid\password", or "userid+password" or something else in same field. I don't see any difference between hitting tab and "\", or "+".
It is not a problem; I don't think the world would survive 2047 attack from aliens.
Online evolvable questions and answers, wouldn't that be a great idea?! Users can be allowed to question, answer, group, categorize, and tag. Users could find related questions and other variants, together and don't see any licenses associated with this. Will it be, wikianswers?! :)
Could we apply it to the microprocessors?! Single core is enough first, and then we can move towards dual, quad and 80 core processors.
Sure, it will.
Upper class + Upper class = Mostly upper class (common)
Underclass + Underclass = Mostly underclass (common)
Upper class + Underclass = upper class / underclass (rare)
Underclass + Upper class = underclass / upper class (rare)
Why adding more and more cores? Add other things too inside the microprocessors, like, memory, etc. Why not SOC?
Latest technology will solve "*@home" projects first
why not 256 16-cores or 126 32-cores?!
anti-Linux? why not anti-Windows? someone who really like linux why need a second os like Windows?
> The law will supposedly protect people from unwarranted hackers or virus attacks and can fine individuals up to $1M who are found guilty of breaking into a computer without the owners knowledge. At the same time, it also allows some of the better known capable companies to 'look' into your computer for possible virus/spyware and fix the problem without informing you. And, while these friends are doing their job, they can also take the moment to do other things.
what about unwarranted hackers or virus that look into your computer for possible fix of the better known capable companies and harm you?!
Don't know why we are looking for water and air. Wouldn't it be possible for X (life?) Y (live?) without these things. Isnt it we (life on earth) adapted ourselves to consume these things air, water, air-in-water, etc.