And unless they are aware of this sort of agreements common among people well versed into BDSM (which not everyone is, can you dig that?), they can perfectly say no and mean yes.
In fact I once actually stopped fingering a girl in the car who was moaning "please stop, I don't want" etc, (the reason being because I got fed up of the game for whatever reason), she was really on the verge of orgasm and she was furious about me afterwards. I guess she must have given herself a nice long wank in her bed after coming home, cursing me in all manners imaginable ("fuck me you piece of shit"):-)
I was really a fool to do that at that time, I'd never do it again. If a girl really wants you to stop you know it immediately from her angry voice and struggling. If you're not able to tell the difference you're a sorry moron.
Well it looks like someone finally had the balls to ignore the nuclear-as-a-religion crowd. And believe me these are the worst, because not only are they unshakably convinced that they have the one and only valid solution, like all the others, but in addition to that they despise all their contenders as stupid, gullible ignoramuses.
Because they understand about all the little beasts, you know, protons, neutrons, those things, thus they can haughtily laugh and scorn at the stupid hippies concerned with hidden costs (they are due to excessive regulation, see how better things are without regulation, like the Gulf coast?), contamination of the environement (that's ridiculous because Chernobyl cannot possibly happen again, never another gram of radioactive material is ever going to be released in the wild, even when all the countries in the world will run dozens if not hundreds of reactors), waste disposal (a really laughable concern, the solution is obvious, just use breeder reactors that will be commercially viable anytime soon now, just at the same time commercial fusion arrives in fact, besides the French already do it with great success, only not but let's move on) and proliferation (that's really ridiculous, you only have to use totally different reactors that do not exist yet but are really amazing).
Your claim is stupid. The fuel arriving at the power station is solar radiation and is free. The power station is made of a tower, a bathtub of salt and a bunch of mirrors. What part of the schema do you not understand?
To me the most interesting topic, which strangely seems to go almost undiscussed, is that the US knows perfectly well that the great ally Saudi Arabia is the main source of funds for terrorists all around. This sheds a very interesting light on the so-called "War on Terror".
Oh and also that the US is funding the Taliban. This one is so outrageous it's almost funny.
From what I've heard he offered several times to answer questions while in Sweden and was rejected; then he asked if it was ok for him to leave the country and they told him it was. Several weeks after that they started the manhunt.
I mean, in your world, once she lets you bang her she's lost the right to say no forever? Or can she change her mind?
She's definitely the right to change her mind and say she'd prefer it to stop, but at that point it seems to me it sould really be dealt as a matrimonial argument, definitely not as a rape case, i.e., something that should remain totally out of the judicial system, let along the criminal system. Unless of course he punched the girls in the face and forced himself upon them to finish off, which is not the case from the few elements I've got about the case.
Bow to the man and offer him your behind to please himself with. That way you'll definitely have a long, healthy and - possibly depending on your take of it - happy life.
What I don't understand with all that BS is that basically once the cockpit door is locked and the pilots has the instructions of not yelding and opening the door even in case of someone threatening the crew or passengers, then the only option to bring down the plane is using explosives.
Now I thought that any explosives could be easily detected by sniffing dogs. Also there are technologies that are able to detect in real time trace amount of any molecule on clothes. Definitley the dopey, scruffy shoe or pant bombers would have been immediately spotted by a sniffing dog, so why not just have one or two dogs in every airport?
I do that too and I absolutely hate X windows. Have you ever tried to run an Oracle installer on a server from home, i.e., with limited bandwidth and some non-negligible network latency? The reaction times are horrendous! I've actually spend quite a few hours at night waiting for 1 to 2 minutes between successive clicks. God forbid I clicked twice on a button. It would have been literally faster to just drive to the site and do the thing locally.
Man, running an X application over the Internet. I can't think of many worse experiences in computing. Perhaps something with coding in VB on a cmd window could match it.
As somebody said (too lazy to find the reference), it's hard to believe that the X11 authors have not been shot in the street already:-/
Because you're an idiot and arguing with you basically amounts to a waste of time. But to still answer your points because you ask
1 - Nuclear and even oil energy companies get huge incentive for the governement too.
2 - Gov't needs to step in to try and address the tragedy of the common, i.e., the fact that those energy sources look cheap because they pollute for free (check Wikipedia).
Well I have a hard time figuring out how could thermal solar plants be very expensive, at least in areas like California, Nevada or Florida. Basically what you need is mirrors and a big tub of salt; doesn't sound like very high-tech, expensive or polluting components. Available space is definitely not a problem in California or Nevada. There might be some effort needed in improving transmission technology if you were to provide the whole US with solar thermal, but I would really like to hear a good argument why cities like LA, Las Vegas or Miami coud not be almost 100% provided for with solar thermal, even 40 years ago already.
Where did you get that information from? OpenVPN is UDP based and has always been as far as I can tell. It supports tunnelling over TCP but advises against it. From the documentation:
OpenVPN is designed to operate optimally over UDP, but TCP capability is provided for situations where UDP cannot be used. In comparison with UDP, TCP will usually be somewhat less efficient and less robust when used over unreliable or congested networks.
Slashdot Mirror
He said no but meant yes.
And unless they are aware of this sort of agreements common among people well versed into BDSM (which not everyone is, can you dig that?), they can perfectly say no and mean yes.
:-)
In fact I once actually stopped fingering a girl in the car who was moaning "please stop, I don't want" etc, (the reason being because I got fed up of the game for whatever reason), she was really on the verge of orgasm and she was furious about me afterwards. I guess she must have given herself a nice long wank in her bed after coming home, cursing me in all manners imaginable ("fuck me you piece of shit")
I was really a fool to do that at that time, I'd never do it again. If a girl really wants you to stop you know it immediately from her angry voice and struggling. If you're not able to tell the difference you're a sorry moron.
Who types in a site name anyway? To get porn you enter appropriate terms in a google searchbox, that's how it's done.
Fraternité was dropped some times ago. Egalité was ever only there for the nice outlook. Bye bye Liberté chérie!
Well it looks like someone finally had the balls to ignore the nuclear-as-a-religion crowd. And believe me these are the worst, because not only are they unshakably convinced that they have the one and only valid solution, like all the others, but in addition to that they despise all their contenders as stupid, gullible ignoramuses.
Because they understand about all the little beasts, you know, protons, neutrons, those things, thus they can haughtily laugh and scorn at the stupid hippies concerned with hidden costs (they are due to excessive regulation, see how better things are without regulation, like the Gulf coast?), contamination of the environement (that's ridiculous because Chernobyl cannot possibly happen again, never another gram of radioactive material is ever going to be released in the wild, even when all the countries in the world will run dozens if not hundreds of reactors), waste disposal (a really laughable concern, the solution is obvious, just use breeder reactors that will be commercially viable anytime soon now, just at the same time commercial fusion arrives in fact, besides the French already do it with great success, only not but let's move on) and proliferation (that's really ridiculous, you only have to use totally different reactors that do not exist yet but are really amazing).
Your claim is stupid. The fuel arriving at the power station is solar radiation and is free. The power station is made of a tower, a bathtub of salt and a bunch of mirrors. What part of the schema do you not understand?
Your tax dollars at work!
If I rememeber well the closing words of Platoon where precisely in this line: "basically we were fighting ourselves". Again, America?
To me the most interesting topic, which strangely seems to go almost undiscussed, is that the US knows perfectly well that the great ally Saudi Arabia is the main source of funds for terrorists all around. This sheds a very interesting light on the so-called "War on Terror".
Oh and also that the US is funding the Taliban. This one is so outrageous it's almost funny.
From what I've heard he offered several times to answer questions while in Sweden and was rejected; then he asked if it was ok for him to leave the country and they told him it was. Several weeks after that they started the manhunt.
"How does this finding effect the ratio of dark to regular matter?"
Or its existence altogether...
And the day you realize you are an assbag, are you going to do you in?
I mean, in your world, once she lets you bang her she's lost the right to say no forever? Or can she change her mind?
She's definitely the right to change her mind and say she'd prefer it to stop, but at that point it seems to me it sould really be dealt as a matrimonial argument, definitely not as a rape case, i.e., something that should remain totally out of the judicial system, let along the criminal system. Unless of course he punched the girls in the face and forced himself upon them to finish off, which is not the case from the few elements I've got about the case.
And by the sheer sound that you make I can tell you're a stinking asshole.
Georges, don't touch me!
Georges, don't touch!
Georges, don't!
Bow to the man and offer him your behind to please himself with. That way you'll definitely have a long, healthy and - possibly depending on your take of it - happy life.
What I don't understand with all that BS is that basically once the cockpit door is locked and the pilots has the instructions of not yelding and opening the door even in case of someone threatening the crew or passengers, then the only option to bring down the plane is using explosives.
Now I thought that any explosives could be easily detected by sniffing dogs. Also there are technologies that are able to detect in real time trace amount of any molecule on clothes. Definitley the dopey, scruffy shoe or pant bombers would have been immediately spotted by a sniffing dog, so why not just have one or two dogs in every airport?
And a bazooka for good measure.
Pics or it didn't happen...
Stupid slashdot
I do that too and I absolutely hate X windows. Have you ever tried to run an Oracle installer on a server from home, i.e., with limited bandwidth and some non-negligible network latency? The reaction times are horrendous! I've actually spend quite a few hours at night waiting for 1 to 2 minutes between successive clicks. God forbid I clicked twice on a button. It would have been literally faster to just drive to the site and do the thing locally.
:-/
Man, running an X application over the Internet. I can't think of many worse experiences in computing. Perhaps something with coding in VB on a cmd window could match it.
As somebody said (too lazy to find the reference), it's hard to believe that the X11 authors have not been shot in the street already
Because you're an idiot and arguing with you basically amounts to a waste of time. But to still answer your points because you ask 1 - Nuclear and even oil energy companies get huge incentive for the governement too. 2 - Gov't needs to step in to try and address the tragedy of the common, i.e., the fact that those energy sources look cheap because they pollute for free (check Wikipedia).
[...]getting a free pass emitting pollutants [...] which would be very expensive to sequester and dealt with properly
Well this sounds sorely adequate to the case of nuclear energy too.
Well I have a hard time figuring out how could thermal solar plants be very expensive, at least in areas like California, Nevada or Florida. Basically what you need is mirrors and a big tub of salt; doesn't sound like very high-tech, expensive or polluting components. Available space is definitely not a problem in California or Nevada. There might be some effort needed in improving transmission technology if you were to provide the whole US with solar thermal, but I would really like to hear a good argument why cities like LA, Las Vegas or Miami coud not be almost 100% provided for with solar thermal, even 40 years ago already.
Well it definitely would. In what world have you been living recently?
OpenVPN is designed to operate optimally over UDP, but TCP capability is provided for situations where UDP cannot be used. In comparison with UDP, TCP will usually be somewhat less efficient and less robust when used over unreliable or congested networks.