Here is the first table
Table 1: Top 10 authors ranked by contribution of code
Author % of total
free software foundation, inc 11.231
sun microsystems, inc 1.848
the regents of the university of california 1.359
gordon matzigkeit 1.216
paul houle 1.042
thomas g. lane 0.782
the massachusetts institute of technology 0.762
ulrich drepper 0.559
lyle johnson 0.528
peter miller 0.525
The backups work OK: The search, uhhhh, I dunno http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://csourc esearch.net/ http://csourcesearch.net.nyud.net:8090/
There is a better system, forked from the Azureus bittorrent client, called The Localhost Program.
From wikipedia:
Azureus was modified to create the Localhost Program, which uses the Distributed Database to maintain a virtual file system.
Localhost homepage
Linux will never be big on the desktop, it's too geeky, it's based in geekiness, therefore it will always be the geek's niche. Something like beos or haiku or Tunes, however, will be big, though.
The company was ordered to modify the software within two months (a ruling enforceable only in Australia). Sharman and the other five parties also face paying millions of dollars in damages to the record labels that instigated the legal action. [3].
In the early days of compact discs, vinyl records were still prized by audiophiles because of better reproduction of analog recordings; however, the drawback was greater sensitivity to scratches and dust. Early compact discs were perceived by some as screechy, distorting sounds on the high end, and not as "warm" as vinyl especially in recordings that require a wide dynamic range (e.g. classical recordings). This resulted in a slower acceptance of digital music in its early years by some listeners.
Though digital audio technology has improved over the years, some audiophiles still prefer what they perceive as the warmer and more detailed sound of vinyl over the harsher sound of CDs. Some listeners were also disappointed by what they considered to be unfaithful remastering of analog recordings. The advent of higher-quality digital formats, notably SACD, offers the tantalizing possibility of combining the high-quality sound of the best analog recordings with the convenience and durability of the CD. Many artists still release recordings, in limited pressings, on vinyl.
The arguments about the superior quality of vinyl records are wide-ranging. Proponents of analog audio argue that, unlike CD audio, it is not affected by the sharp frequency cutoff and phase characteristics, including group delay, near the Nyquist frequency and the quantization noise of 16-bit linear quantization, but that analog recording has a more gradual frequency cutoff, and what they consider to be a more natural descent into the analog noise floor.
Proponents of digital audio state that these differences are generally inaudible to normal human hearing, and the lack of clicks, hiss and pops from digital recordings greatly improved sound fidelity. They also state that more modern anti-aliasing filters and oversampling systems used in modern CD recordings greatly reduce the problems observed with early CDs.
The "warmer" sound of analog records is generally believed on both sides of the argument to be an artifact of the dynamic harmonic distortion characteristic of vinyl recording. It is thought by supporters of digital audio that the fans of vinyl got so used to it they think it is actually a more "faithful" to the real sound, when it is actually the other way around. (This phenomenon of a preference for the sound of a beloved lower-fidelity technology is not new; a 1963 review of RCA Dynagroove recordings notes that "some listeners object to the ultra-smooth sound as... sterile... such distortion-forming sounds as those produced by loud brasses are eliminated at the expense of fidelity. They prefer for a climactic fortissimo to blast their machines...")
Nevertheless, critics of compact disc audio have observed that more recent digital audio systems are being designed to use higher sampling rates (for example, 96kHz) and finer quantization (for example 24 rather than 16 bits per sample), and state that this would not be being done if it did not bring some audible improvement to the output.
Because some people prefer to compress their music with the compressor of their choice, albeit LAME 3.97ß1 or the in-the-works LAME 4.0 or Ogg Vorbis or musepack or mpeg4 or matroska or wma
RIAA originally was created to enforce the RIAA equalization curve, back when every company needed their own equalization.
So they started out ok.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIAA_equalization
Have you beheld a man skillful in his work? Before kings he will station himself.
By Solomon, in Proverbs
The world was built by hands, and even the machines, and the machines that built machines, were built by hands.
But with the money you'd save surely some good lighting would help.
http://www.advogato.org/article/85.html
which links to the open-source metrics:
http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html
which is dead but is still on the archive:
http://orbiten.org/ofss/01.html">The link doesn't work!@!#@!@@!
Here is the first table Table 1: Top 10 authors ranked by contribution of code Author % of total free software foundation, inc 11.231 sun microsystems, inc 1.848 the regents of the university of california 1.359 gordon matzigkeit 1.216 paul houle 1.042 thomas g. lane 0.782 the massachusetts institute of technology 0.762 ulrich drepper 0.559 lyle johnson 0.528 peter miller 0.525
Table 1: Top 10 authors ranked by contribution of code Author % of total free software foundation, inc 11.231 sun microsystems, inc 1.848 the regents of the university of california 1.359 gordon matzigkeit 1.216 paul houle 1.042 thomas g. lane 0.782 the massachusetts institute of technology0.762 ulrich drepper 0.559 lyle johnson 0.528 peter miller 0.525 more...Sheeesh.
h tml
I still miss audiogalaxy to this day... it's the reason I bought a cd-burner.
ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audiogalaxy
http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2002/agsettle.
The backups work OK:c esearch.net/
The search, uhhhh, I dunno
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:http://csour
http://csourcesearch.net.nyud.net:8090/
foldershare still works, heh, for now.
There is a better system, forked from the Azureus bittorrent client, called The Localhost Program.
From wikipedia: Azureus was modified to create the Localhost Program, which uses the Distributed Database to maintain a virtual file system.
Localhost homepage
there is an addon called user agent switcher. http://chrispederick.com/work/useragentswitcher/ "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050804 Firefox/1.0.6"
THC Credit can extrapolate numbers from real cards and check them: http://www.thc.org/download.php?t=r&f=thc-c191.zip
You should signup using Tor as your proxy too: http://tor.eff.org/
Also some cool google stuff:m
s html
How to Verify Credit Card Numbers In Perl
Sample credit card numbers to use for testing http://perl.about.com/library/weekly/aa080600g.ht
cardware:
http://www.flashback.se/library/software/carding.
From the people who brought you THC-Scan, the most advanced wardialer ever created, comes THC-Credit. http://www.thc.org/
It's a condom, duh!!
Musical tones stop dogs from barking.
http://www.k9kalmer.com/
As seen on digg.com/diggall
You can also search sourceforge.net for audioscrobbler http://sourceforge.net/search/?words=audioscrobble r
Linux will never be big on the desktop, it's too geeky, it's based in geekiness, therefore it will always be the geek's niche. Something like beos or haiku or Tunes, however, will be big, though.
I saw it on Wikipedia, so it must be true!
Even better, adaptive article filters! You could click "this article is spam" and never see it again.
The Solution? Kill Bill!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_fingerprint
Didn't Napster have this too?
It seems within the realm of possibility.
MusicBrainz may have this too.
From wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazaa#History
Wow, that is awesome!! So now noone can complain about slow java!
Ermmm, can this compile Java to 100% native code? I thought that was the point of GCJ.
Because some people prefer to compress their music with the compressor of their choice, albeit LAME 3.97ß1 or the in-the-works LAME 4.0 or Ogg Vorbis or musepack or mpeg4 or matroska or wma
They're going to $1000-6000$ on ebay
If it works, why replace it?
RIAA originally was created to enforce the RIAA equalization curve, back when every company needed their own equalization. So they started out ok. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIAA_equalization
Googlopia! http://derekyu.com/art/googlopia.html