Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 360 Launches In U.S.

Well, it's here. Braving long lines and launch parties, and even jail time, those that were willing to pony up the time and money have their hands on the first player in the next-gen war. 360 impressions are available all across the web, with [H]ardOCP and Gamespot offering exhaustive experiences for the interested gamer. The BBC, as always, offers a bigger perspective on the launch, and Gamasutra confirms that Microsoft is in for the long haul in the games industry. From the BBC: "Sony and Nintendo are planning to unleash their next gen consoles during 2006, giving Microsoft an edge over its rivals. The software giant is virtually tied with Nintendo for second place, way behind Sony, in a games market worth $25 billion globally. Microsoft has ambitious plans for its new machine. It said it expects to ship up to three million 360s worldwide within 90 days. But the company has admitted that the worldwide launch of the console could mean shortages in the run-up to Christmas. The console is due to hit Europe on 2 December and Japan on 10 December and some retailers are also warning about limited supplies."

551 comments

  1. Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft is in for the long haul

    This is where it all falls apart. Killer this, great that, awesome the other thing. Really, the only hype that matters is this:

    1. It's another game console.
    2. It's going to have some great games.
    3. The manufacturer is irrelevent, because no matter what else the box promises, once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet, covered with hardened Cheeto grease, dust, a few dents from being kicked when things didn't go quite to plan in a game and utterly forgotten until Garage Sale Season.
    Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort. But what the distillate is you're not going to buy it to watch DVDs on, you're going to play games with it. You're not going to surf the internet, you're going to play games with it. It won't transform you into some actuallized renaissance man (or woman) through shear wonderfulness of the Total Microsoft Experience, you will play games with it.

    Microsoft is under some crazy dellusion that this is some hook into the household which will bring more fish in. Really, it'll just bring gamers who are only loyal until the next gotta-have game pops up on the next revolutionary console.

    If you've guessed by now that I'm not getting one, you would be right. My Athlon64 PC with top of the line video and sound cards plays this game just fine. I see no reason to switch.

    "worldwide launch of the console could mean shortages in the run-up to Christmas. The console is due to hit Europe on 2 December and Japan on 10 December and some retailers are also warning about limited supplies."

    Argh, the hype! Must resist... must resist!

    Oh. That wasn't so difficult.

    I wonder how many of these will actually go straight from the store to eBay because money is more attractive than having one.

    It must suck to live in a rural area and have to get your fix this way.

    new for xbox 360: uncle steve's chair toss and monkey dance combo! limit numbers, buy today!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by sidb · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wonder how many of these will actually go straight from the store to eBay

      2734 when I checked. That might be one or two percent of the entire US supply so far.

    2. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort.

      Like teenagers or college kids in dorm rooms.

    3. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by xero9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I bought an original Xbox not to play games on, but to use as a media device. It really worked great for all the TV shows and movied I snagged off usenet. Simply put all my files in a shared folder on my computer and fire up Xbox Media Center on the Xbox, and watch what ever I wanted on a nice 35" TV instead of my 17" monitor. It wasn't until I discovered Rainbow Six 3 that I actually started to use it to play games.

    4. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The manufacturer is irrelevent, because no matter what else the box promises, once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet, covered with hardened Cheeto grease, dust, a few dents from being kicked when things didn't go quite to plan in a game and utterly forgotten until Garage Sale Season.

      That would be true except that you seem to have ignored the fact that new games will be constantly released for the system for at least the next 4-5 years.

    5. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More college students have computers than televisions. Most use the computer screen *as* a television for watching DVDs or whatever movies the guy down the hall got off of the internet.

    6. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 0
      That would be true except that you seem to have ignored the fact that new games will be constantly released for the system for at least the next 4-5 years.

      Son. (or Daughter) Lemme tell ya, I've been around this market for over 25 years. Nothing, NOTHING lasts more than 2 years. The Atari VCS was probably the closest anything came to lasting and what a sorry thing that was compared to those consoles which came along and buried it.

      It's like denying Moore's Law. In 2 years it'll be something else.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

      once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet, covered with hardened Cheeto grease, dust, a few dents from being kicked when things didn't go quite to plan in a game and utterly forgotten until Garage Sale Season

      It's been my experience that cheetos tend to leave more of a powdery residue than a greasy one

      Microsoft is under some crazy dellusion that this is some hook into the household which will bring more fish in.

      We've never heard Sony make those claims!

      For the most part, though, I agree. Let the fanboys buy in the first year. I'll wait till they drop below US$200

    8. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "gaming" sucks, you faggot. Your whole posts strips you of your merit as a gamer, thus removing your ability to speak on behalf of any of them. Nobody here buys it, either. The 486DX with a Trident 512K video card is NOT an "Athlon64 PC with top of the line video and sound cards", so go back to playing your little butt-buddy game, because no "gamer" cares about JSettlers. :).

    9. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet

      Not if it's hackable. If I knew the Xbox 360 were going to be hackable, I'd be more interested in buying one now, at full price. Since it might not be (odds are, even if it is, it will be a much bigger PITA than the Xbox) I'm not buying one until either hacks come out or the price comes down quite a bit.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by estebanf · · Score: 1
      Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort. But what the distillate is you're not going to buy it to watch DVDs on, you're going to play games with it. You're not going to surf the internet, you're going to play games with it. It won't transform you into some actuallized renaissance man (or woman) through shear wonderfulness of the Total Microsoft Experience, you will play games with it.

      Not true. Your statement doesn't cosider new customers, kids rooms, people with new houses, etc... I'm happy to have another option that include more functionality in only 1 electronic.

      The manufacturer is irrelevent

      Again, not true. People that want to have a next-gen console will make the choice bases in their past experiences. For me, xbox is far superior than ps2 so I'm sticking to 360.

      --
      DON'T STEAL MUSIC!
    11. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by dnaumov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are people who don't have a computer, the internet and don't have a DVD player. Yet, many of these people (I know quite a few) enjoy playing console games on their TV. A device like XBOX360 is perfect for them: they get a game console AND a whole lot of stuff they didn't have before. Quite obviously they won't be picking it up for launch prices, but they will surely come, just as they did with the original XBOX.

    12. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Frumious+Wombat · · Score: 1

      So, question (seriously): Why do these things still exist?

      You've got a CPU, moderate-sized memory, HD, DVD-ROM, and input-device. Basically, it's a computer, with the user-mangleable parts missing. Why doesn't this come with a web-browser on a disk, a link to (MicroSoft/SONY/IBM) services, and an iDrive (or whatever you want to call it) network storage area for the average home user who wants it for entertainment and light email. No more "home-sysadmin" duties for the average user, and more importantly, no "home-emergency-sysadmin" duties for you over holiday breaks, no more worrying if your data is backed up. Alternately, ship a version of WINCE on a DVD with it, provide Word for Wince as HomeWord (or whatever), a current browser, and once again, one device, two functions, harder to hurt yourself than with a standard PC.

      OTOH, why doesn't your PC come with a partition on the drive that when you boot it you choose (PC/Console), and if the latter it boots into a stripped-down, hard to hurt yourself (i.e. the rest of the harddrive is invisible) X-Box mode? One computing device, a couple of input controllers (keyboard/game-pad), and an extra S-Video output on the graphics card. Microsoft could get out of the hardware manufacturing business entirely (and the associated support and shipping channels), and just worry about content creation/licensing.

      --
      the more accurate the calculations became, the more the concepts tended to vanish into thin air. R. S. Mulliken
    13. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Chr0nik · · Score: 1

      The manufacturer is irrelevent, because no matter what else the box promises, once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet, covered with hardened Cheeto grease, dust, a few dents from being kicked when things didn't go quite to plan in a game and utterly forgotten until Garage Sale Season.

      Or they will jump on board with whatever group decides to start a movement to install linux on it.(which won't take long at all)

      --


      ... what did you expect, something profound?
    14. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Turken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It must suck to live in a rural area and have to get your fix this way.

      Actually, by living in a rural area in a poor part of the state, I've found it EASIER to find the must-have systems (well, I've only been here for the Nintendo DS and sony PSP) available on launch day. I'm not sure if the K-mart two towns over still has 360's 'cause I don't need one and don't have a reason to be near there today, but I'm sure that it took them at least several hours to sell out if they did.

    15. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Soporific · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure where you are going with this but I still use my original X-Box...

      ~S

    16. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure where you are going with this but I still use my original X-Box...

      Expecting any NEW games to be release for it?

      Once the new game pipe runs dry you've got a relic. Just like my Sega-whatchamacallit with all those great games I can still play, if I could ever pull myself away from stuff that isn't so tacky.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    17. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck are you talking about? Are you slow?

      PS2 - now quit trolling

    18. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      If it actually looked like something that would fit in with an entertainment system (like if it looked like a dvd player or a vcd, or something that at least looked like it belonged by my tv) I would really consider buying and replacing my dvd player with it. But right now, the white rounded-ness of it just doesn't jive.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    19. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort. But what the distillate is you're not going to buy it to watch DVDs on, you're going to play games with it. You're not going to surf the internet, you're going to play games with it. It won't transform you into some actuallized renaissance man (or woman) through shear wonderfulness of the Total Microsoft Experience, you will play games with it.

      See, that's the thing. I believe more people than you give credit will use it as both a media center and a game console. Essentially anyone living in a smaller space like an apartment will like the idea being able to play games, watch movies and listen to music--all in high-definition and surround sound--without having a big (and expensive) stack of components.

      In addition, the console brings something pretty new to the scene. Now, if you have video or audio stored on your computer you can play it on your 360 via wireless or wired networking. Why try to watch content on your computer from an uncomfortable chair using poor speakers watching on a small monitor when instead you can watch it from the comfort of a coutch on a large TV screen (YMMV here).

      Is the 360 some magical gift from God? Obviously not, but in the same token it's not the same game console we played back in 1985. Also, nobody should make it sound like it's a big Microsoft ploy to hype this up as much as they can. Sony is just as bad (if not worse in some ways) about hyping up anything new they release. Nintendo doesn't seem to be quite as bad, but they still do some crazy stuff to try and get attention.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    20. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by metternich · · Score: 1

      If I knew the Xbox 360 were going to be hackable, I'd be more interested in buying one now, at full price.

      Yes, but they don't make money off you hacking it. Even at full price, it's still sold at a loss.

      --
      Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
    21. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by JPriest · · Score: 1

      What is the point of paying thousands to get one from eBay and then having to wait for shipping? Why not just pre-order? At worst it would take you 1 or 2 days longer than eBay.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    22. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Payday_Jones · · Score: 1

      * Thumbs through recipts * * October 2000 - Playstation 2 * Yep, good call dude, 10/00 that WAS about 2 years ago! Now I understand why no one plays their PS2 anymore! It's more than 2 years old now.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too scared to laugh"
    23. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      Do you expect any new PC games to be released that could run at full quality on a system you bought in 2001?

    24. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      And really, why not? People will buy it, for many times the price of the actual item in stores. The vast majority of those with them will probably make some cash off of it and go buy one from the stores when the hype dies down, after lining their pockets at the expense of the early adopter. What's really goofy is we see the same thing in EVE Online whenever new things are released to the game's market. New player skills have to be bought, and frequently the day things are released the popular skills are bought in an entire region and put back on sale at a hefty markup. Only works for the first day, after which the NPCs reseed the markets, but it's an interesting thing to watch how virtual markets can work the same way. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    25. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Golias · · Score: 1

      Didn't Halo 2 just come out less than a year ago? Wasn't it a massive hit? Wasn't the X-Box already several years old at that point?

      Didn't the Playstation get released in 1994? Wasn't it still selling well enough in 2000 for Sony to find it worthwhile to repackage it as the "PSOne" and keep selling it? Weren't games still being made for it right up until the release of the PS2 (also in 2000)?

      Suddenly, the well-informed opinion that "NOTHING lasts longer than two years" sounds like total bullshit.

      The life cycle of a game console (provided it's not a major flop) is about five years, not two.

      Would you like something to drink with your plate of crow?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    26. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by smclean · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I do all the same things with MythTV, and that's its "intended purpose". Only I didn't have to buy any MS gaming boxes or $400 worth of MS software to do it, and I control exactly how it works. It's *mine* from source code to hardware. But hey, OTOH, a lot of people like Tivo, too. ;)

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    27. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Do you expect any new PC games to be released that could run at full quality on a system you bought in 2001?

      Actually, yeah I do. It was a killer system, though.

      Your point is taken, but the PC fills many more needs than an XBOX or 360 will, thanks to me being in total control of upgrade and expansion.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    28. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      People who sells things in ebay doesn't neccesarily need to have them. Most of those xboxes will be probably bought in the next days (the minium bid period, etc) when the number of units delivered increases

    29. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by blincoln · · Score: 1

      2 years?

      The PS2 is five years old and still going. The original Xbox is 3, and will still be getting new games at least a few months into 2006. The PS1 was in the mainstream market from 1994-2000.

      I could go on, but every console I'm researching (SNES, etc) is in the 3-4 year range at least. The only ones I would put in the = 2 years category would be failures like the Jaguar and 5200.

      PS: I had a 2600 in the 80s too.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    30. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Didn't Halo 2 just come out less than a year ago? Wasn't it a massive hit? Wasn't the X-Box already several years old at that point? Didn't the Playstation get released in 1994? Wasn't it still selling well enough in 2000 for Sony to find it worthwhile to repackage it as the "PSOne" and keep selling it? Weren't games still being made for it right up until the release of the PS2 (also in 2000)?

      Didn't several people predict the death of PC gaming?

      Now all manner of must-have games like WoW are making PC gaming flourish. This more than the consoles attractiveness has extended their cycle. This is also much the reason Microsoft is selling a PC labeled XBox 360.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    31. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      Gaming console releases are on 4-5 years cycles with often completely new architectures, this is very different from the PC world where every individual component class is standard, each class has multiple incremental improvements from various vendors each year and each class usually has multiple price/performance points to choose from.

      The PS2 was released in 2000, the PS3 is coming some time next year so the PS2 will have a commercial life of 6+ years. The PS3's release will not lead to overnight discontinuation of ongoing PS2 projects and PS2 console sales so the PS3 commercial life might exceed seven years. Console and PC product cycles are two fundamentally different things simply because a console's specs are set in stone from design to end-of-life, no PC-style "hardware of the day" syndrome. There is also the matter of exclusive games that make all other game consoles irrelevant if one of the games you really want to play exists on only one platform.

    32. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not if it's hackable. If I knew the Xbox 360 were going to be hackable, I'd be more interested in buying one now, at full price.

      Of course it's hackable. Everything is hackable!

      Since it might not be (odds are, even if it is, it will be a much bigger PITA than the Xbox) I'm not buying one until either hacks come out or the price comes down quite a bit.

      Ooooooh! Now I get it. You don't mean you want it to be 0 you mean you want it to be "hacked by other people with more skill than me, so I can follow some simple instructions on a web page and feel all '1337 and stuff because I can make it play my bootleg pr0n off a file server."

      Why didn't you just come right out and say so?

      I give it a year, maybe 18 months tops, before the exploit kit you want comes along. Meanwhile, why not just buy a Mac mini, and do pretty much everything you would have done with your "hacked" 360 today? Oh, that's right... using a Mac is easy, and therefore not '1337. You need a fugly media interface based on hacks that you did not write for a console that wasn't intended for what you are doing, or else your scr1pt k1dd13 friends will laugh at you.

    33. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 0
      The PS2 is five years old and still going.

      It's only going because Sony has been held up on development of the PS3. Though they did release the PSP in the interim, in case you forgot.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    34. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by vertinox · · Score: 1

      And I see prices from $900 to $1500 for the "buy now" features...

      Yikes!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    35. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have a TV in your bedroom, you can get rid of the DVD player [i]and[/i] you can stream music and... ahem... videos (MPEG) from your Windows PC. Even VOB files play, just rename them to .MPEG.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    36. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Deadguy2322 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the last PS1 game released came out in 2004. Ten years after the Japanese launch.

      --
      Check out my foes list to see who is so retarded that they can't use the signature line!!!
    37. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by stox · · Score: 1

      Over 3000 now. The highest priced, that has actually had bids on, it is $1555. Absolutely amazing. I'm sure there will be many more by the end of the day.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    38. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by rcamera · · Score: 2, Insightful

      more college students have a computer than a tv because there is no need for more than 1 tv per room. a dvd drive and internet connection are no match for a tv with a dvd capable console. how many college kids in these days of 'free' cable in dorms (depending on the school obviously) don't have access to a tv in their room?

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    39. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Even at full price, [the XBOX 360 is] still sold at a loss.

      <critical>Maybe Microsoft could make some money off the machine if they knew how to actually design hardware rather than slapping a new case on a PC.</critical>

      Seriously, at $399 a unit, I'm absolutely shocked that Microsoft is still losing money on the thing. The CPU and the GPU are the two expensive components. In bulk, I'd have a hard time believing that they cost more than $150-$175 together. The rest of the hardware is relatively inexpensive stuff, costing maybe $50-$100 at most. That leaves me with a total of $200-$275 for manufacturing, making me wonder where the inefficiency is. Is Microsoft really that BAD at hardware design that they can't sell a $399 integrated PC at anything less than a loss?

    40. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by pl1ght · · Score: 0

      ANd you can game? and watch dvds? and have "perfect" 1080i etc output to your TV? I ran MythTV on my XPC HTPC and while it was great and more than adequate, it is nothing compared to the streaming quality the xbox360 is giving. at least what ive had time to check out so far.

    41. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 1

      I still play Halo (better than Halo 2) to this day. The only thing keeping me from playing religiously is that I'm in Hawaii and my friends who play are back in FL. But you bet your ass I'll jump into another 4-hour 16-man CTF match on Blood Gulch only to be followed up by 6 hours on Sidewinder.

      What were you getting at again?

      --
      "This is considered plagiarism."
    42. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Expecting any NEW games to be release for it?

      I bought the just-released Worms 4 Mayhem for my Xbox last month.

      I was hoping to buy the new Zelda for my Gamecube for my son this holidaty, but it won't be released until April. So I'll probably get the just released Fire Emblem for GC instead.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    43. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Ooooooh! Now I get it. You don't mean you want it to be 0 you mean you want it to be "hacked by other people with more skill than me, so I can follow some simple instructions on a web page and feel all '1337 and stuff because I can make it play my bootleg pr0n off a file server."

      Why would I want to do the hard work when many people more talented than me are even more interested in having a hack and are already working on it? They have more useful hardware (I haven't even built a JTAG programmer yet, because I'm lazy) and more useful experience.

      In the meantime, I'm using an Xbox as my media center. Unlike a mac mini, it actually has TV out. Xbox Media Center is gorgeous and works pretty well these days. The Xbox (all told) cost me about $200, with the mega-x-key and the DVD remote. That's less than half the cost of the mini. It may be less than half the machine, too, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    44. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of guys I work with each pre-ordered two of them and each sold one on eBay for about $800. So they basically got someone else to buy them an Xbox. But they sold theirs weeks ago, so you won't see them on eBay today.

    45. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Well, if you have a TV in your bedroom, you can get rid of the DVD player [i]and[/i] you can stream music and... ahem... videos (MPEG) from your Windows PC. Even VOB files play, just rename them to .MPEG.

      I've had a portable DVD player, which will play about a dozen formats and adapts to PAL and NTSC very nicely, for about 2 years. I got it for travel but it works fine for anywhere I want to watch or listen. I rarely watch anything videos on the big TV or PC anymore. I dread the day it stops working. Only real downside is I can't us it as a portable video monitor.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    46. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Halo (better than Halo 2)

      That's like saying Star Trek 1 is better than Star Trek 5: maybe true, but I still wouldn't want to inflict either of them on my worst enemies.

    47. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 1

      You know, everybody keeps saying this... I remember reading that MS chose to sell the 360 for a profit from day 1 after the hit they took on the Xbox...

      --
      "This is considered plagiarism."
    48. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Over 3000 now. The highest priced, that has actually had bids on, it is $1555. Absolutely amazing. I'm sure there will be many more by the end of the day.

      Of course the real trick is getting paid. As a seller of other items on eBay I've had the occasional twit bid and never pay up.

      Probably the best way to capitalize on this craze is to require immediate payment, or it stays in circulation.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    49. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by grahamdrew · · Score: 1

      Pre-ordering has been kind of sticky with the 360, from what In understand. I was at a GameStop the other night talking to the manager while waiting or my credit card to ring up, and he said although he couldnt give any exact numbers they'd gotten well over 100 preorders, were receiving less than a dozen units at launch, and were expecting weekly shipments of similar (less than a dozen units) through the end of the year.

      Pre-ordering and getting a day or two after eBay sales would have had to been set up months ago.

      --
      // Dumps core here
    50. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Golias · · Score: 1

      You seem to have already forgotten your own words, so here's a reminder:

      Son. (or Daughter) Lemme tell ya, I've been around this market for over 25 years. Nothing, NOTHING lasts more than 2 years. The Atari VCS was probably the closest anything came to lasting and what a sorry thing that was compared to those consoles which came along and buried it.

      The Playstation: Six years from it's release until the release of the PS2, ten years of games being released for it and new consoles still being sold. (Not to mention the PS1 chip still embedded in every PS2 console.)

      The Playstation 2: It's been five years (so far) since release, and new games are still coming out for it.

      The X-Box: Halo 2 recently became a top-selling game, outselling many major PC titles, in spite of the X-Box already being about five years old at the time.

      The Game Cube: Came out five years ago, still very popular.

      The Sega Saturn: 1994 - 1999

      The NES: 1985 - 1991

      The Atari 2600: 1977 - 1990

      (That's right, they were still making new 2600 systems 13 years later. In fact, hobbyists are still home-brewing them today!)

      To put it simply, you are completely wrong and obviously misinformed. Everything in the console industry lasts longer than two years, or it is considered a total failure.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    51. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      PS2 came out about 5 years ago. In this last year plenty of new games have come out for it. You are completely wrong. NES lasted many many years. SNES and Genesis lasted many many years. You don't know shit about this market.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    52. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they had one that went for $10,100 earlier today. That one wasn't a preorder or one someone bought instore but one that someone won off that Mountain Dew contest.

    53. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What is the point of paying thousands to get one from eBay and then having to wait for shipping? Why not just pre-order? At worst it would take you 1 or 2 days longer than eBay.

      Not sure how much the shortage is actually real, but what I know is this morning, while eating breakfast, news reporters from several channels were talking about those people waiting in line since about midnight in anticipation of the store opening at 8am (for those stores that didn't take pre-orders). Then, when I got to work (at about 10.30am), I wanted to look at those "Sold out" banners Microsoft made for the retailers, so I went to downtown Montreal's Future Shop (equivalent of Best Buy up here), and there were still 2 core systems and 3 full-systems on the shelves... I could have just taken one to the cash register and brought it home, while a bunch of suckers didn't sleep last night waiting in line in the cold rain...

      Ordering from eBay and waiting for shipping is already pretty pointless, preordering is also useless over here apparently.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    54. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Ahaha so you are including portable systems. You just made the biggest mistake you could make. Gameboy was huge for 10 years. Since your whole point was no new games come out after two years you are sunk. Sorry. You lose.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    55. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Retroneous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no matter what else the box promises, once you're tired of playing the games it'll end up in the back of the closet, covered with hardened Cheeto grease, dust, a few dents from being kicked when things didn't go quite to plan in a game and utterly forgotten until Garage Sale Season.

      Wow. I'm so glad that such a hardcore gamer got the first punt at this topic. My PSOne, Dreamcast, Saturn, Genesis, SNES etc etc aren't on my closet. I haven't become bored of the games, persay, just that I've moved on. I occassionally go back to Duck Hunt on the NES or Speedball 2 on the Genesis, because they're FUN games. Moving on doesn't mean giving up on the past altogether. There's room for all of them if you're creative with your space.

      As for your Athlon64, perhaps you have some issues there. Are there three hundred older and slightly less powerful processors in your closet waiting for a garage sale? You're using "top of the line" kit to play some kid's Java dream. Nice. Like I say, maybe this is why you have such hatred for Microsoft, although they didn't MAKE you upgrade to play Settlers of Catan, you chose to because maybe the satisfying clicky-clicky of the buttons won't slow down when you have your non-Microsoft media player running off MP3's by the dozen.

      Yes, I'm ranting. Yes, I'm sick to the fucking back teeth of Xbox360 stories on Slashdot. Why? Because they all end the same way. Some tit opens up Internet Explorer on a Windows XP (SP4) machine, goes to Slashdot, reads about the Xbox360, thinks for half a second, then writes a torrent of pure unenlightened, uneducated and downright uncalled for bullshit about how he hates Microsoft and how Microsoft screws everybody. Sometimes, he might substitute the "s" in Microsoft for a dollar sign, to represent the fact that they make a shitload of fine money. Then, he sits down with some piss-poor "update" or "fan conversion" of his favourite game from 1987 and plays that, because he can't get the original running without booting into DOS - another Microsoft product. "FUCK Microsoft. Always screwing me over! I don't Goddamn need them. Never did, never will." - Again, as he boots into DOS, which is required to play the original of his favourite game.

      I used to have a calculator. I used to have a word processor. I used to play games on an Atari 2600 jacked into my TV. I used to have to speak to people or pick up the telephone to get my message through. Shopping? I'd go outside and do it. And you talk about convergence and how its such a bad thing? I do all of that at my PC now - which runs Windows XP. I use Word for word processing, since AFAIK no open-source Word processor (I had OpenOffice for a while) exists that does decent grammar and spelling checks - on my Windows XP PC. I use the built in Calculator for calculating stuff - if I don't use Excel - both of which are stored on my Windows XP PC. I shop using my browser - which isn't Microsoft branded, I have to say, but runs on my Windows XP PC. I email my friends or use MSN/YIM/AIM/ICQ/IRC to speak to them - again, from my Windows XP PC. Do you see what I'm getting at?

      I don't love Microsoft. But I sure as hell love what they've done for me. I wouldn't have been designing websites or writing about games for the last ten years and making some decent money for it, if it wasn't for Windows.

      I'll be buying a 360. Why in hell's name does everyone always act like you can only buy one console, anyway? I love games - so I'm going to love Project Gotham Racing 3. Its only for Xbox360 - so since I have a crappy PC that doesn't get upgraded daily, I have some spare cash to pick up a 360 to play it on. The same as I'll pick up a PS3 for Gran Turismo 5, and a Revolution for the new, new, new Mario. Buying a 360 certainly doesn't put me into a box that stops me from buying a competitor's console.

    56. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by stonedonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, at $399 a unit, I'm absolutely shocked that Microsoft is still losing money on the thing. The CPU and the GPU are the two expensive components. In bulk, I'd have a hard time believing that they cost more than $150-$175 together. The rest of the hardware is relatively inexpensive stuff, costing maybe $50-$100 at most. That leaves me with a total of $200-$275 for manufacturing, making me wonder where the inefficiency is. Is Microsoft really that BAD at hardware design that they can't sell a $399 integrated PC at anything less than a loss?

      Yeah, they'll make a killing since they didn't spend a penny on advertising, manufacturing, research and development, haggling with developes, distribution... nigga, please.

    57. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      They're going to $1000-6000$ on ebay

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    58. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Core unit: $299

      CPU/GPU/Case/mobo/DVD/RAM = probably close to $300 at least
      +manufacturing costs (facilities, labor, shipping to assembly centers)
      +advertising
      +development

      Microsoft is losing money any way you slice it, unless everyone goes out and buys a bunch of games and accessories with it at launch (which most stores require you to do.)

    59. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they'll make a killing since they didn't spend a penny on advertising,

      One would expect that the remaining $124-$199 wouldn't be entirely eaten up by such things. $50 a unit for advertising would be extreme, and should still leave them with a margin.

      manufacturing,

      Um. Welcome to the Redundancy Department of Redundancy.

      research and development,

      I said "anything less than a loss", not "a profit". I can understand if they're charging back the profits to R&D based on expected sales. That's not the same thing as selling the console at a loss, though.

      haggling with develope[r]s,

      Dude, that's weak. You need to be a little more specific than "haggling with developers".

      distribution...

      Again, this shouldn't cost enough to place the console at a loss. They're shipping dozens to hundreds of these things to each store. The economies of scale are on their side.

    60. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by default+luser · · Score: 1



      You can't be serious. You're completely missing key components that add up to quite a pretty penny.

      8 x 512Mb Samsung 1.2GHz GDDR3 chips ($50-70). If Microsoft is getting these for less than 6 bucks a pop, they're getting them for a STEAL. And considering how much the high-performance graphics industry is willing to pay for them, I don't see that happening right now. The price will, of course, come down significantly over time.

      20GB SATA hard drive - no less than $40. The capacity doesn't matter...they just take whatever density single-platter drive they're selling in the mainstream and make up a special firmware run that only recognizes 20GB. The assembly costs of a drive cannot be reduced below some minimum.

      Custom motherboard including ICs, assembly and testing - $40-50, minimum.

      So, let's combine those minimums with your minimums:

      Best case, the Xbox's major components cost $150 (CPU+GPU) + $130 (RAM, HDD, MB) = 280, MINIMUM. Add in the costs of non-trivial things like the case, the powersupply, the heatsinks and fans, the controller, the remote control, final assembly, and of course, distribution, and you've got an excellent chance of topping $400.

      Don't forget that platform development and advertising have to be charged against the Xbox earnings to get the real cost of the device.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    61. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by stonedonkey · · Score: 1

      Look man, you can pick apart the off-the-top-of-my-head reasons I came up with, but the fact still remains that parts alone do not a console launch make. I could probably come up with a more reasoned and informed outline of the true cost of launching a console, but my head is full of cold medication.

      But I will attempt to address a couple items. I'm not sure what your response about manufacturing means, respectfully, but the 360 has one thousand seven hundred separate components being made all over the world. It's an orginazation and inventory nightmare. The parts don't just get delivered to Xbox 360 Factory #5 and come out the other end as a complete product. In actuality, it's a network of production centers all coordinating to create the parts of the parts, then putting those parts together, then sending those pieces off to Xbox 360 Factory #5.

      And when I say "haggling with developers," I mean things like partial funding, partial resource supplying (free dev kits, free Macs, free dev tools, free phone support) or outright buying of the property, like MS did with Rare. I'm sure Japanese devs are salivating at the concessions MS will have to make in order to make one of their titles a 360 exclusive.

    62. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Core unit: $299

      Which should actually lower the manufacturing price (though not as much as one might think) due to the lack of the hard drive, wireless controller, and headset.

      CPU/GPU/Case/mobo/DVD/RAM = probably close to $300 at least

      Based on what? With $399 I could build you a reasonably nice PC (without monitor) from off the shelf components at consumer prices. Microsoft has the advantage of bulk, and the fact that most of the components are off the shelf.

      A few of the components are specialized here (CPU and GPU) thus why I singled them out. But we're talking silicon. The manufacturing isn't the expensive part. It's the R&D that you're paying for. That's why your costs drop as you order more units. Any electronics manufacturer will jump at the chance to make up their R&D costs through sustainable bulk rather than individual markups. That's why I actually think that $150 is a bit high for the combined cost of the CPU and GPU.

      +manufacturing costs (facilities, labor, shipping to assembly centers)

      Manufacturing costs are in my guessimations. (i.e. total component costs) Packaging costs and shipping add to it, but only a few dollars per unit.

      +advertising

      It seems extreme to me for Microsoft to be advertising so much that they lose on each system. Especially when they *should* have a reasonable margin to work with.

      +development

      Honestly? I'm a bit shocked to think that this console would really have cost Microsoft that much in R&D. Microsoft farmed the most difficult work out to IBM and ATI, leaving Microsoft only to absorb the costs in chip prices. The rest of the work was probably farmed out as well, leaving Microsoft with primarily software development costs. And even that shouldn't be that high, given that the software is a natural extension of their existing DirectX platform. (Unless they're trying to charge back the ENTIRE DirectX development cost. Still, that's just creative accounting.)

      The more I think about this, the more I wonder if Microsoft actually *is* losing money on the 360. Everyone knows they were losing on the original XBOX, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're losing here.

    63. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be true except that you seem to have ignored the fact that new games will be constantly released for the system for at least the next 4-5 years.

      New Games is actually quite an interesting term when you think about it because, for the most part, there has been nothing new in most new games that have been released over the past 4 or 5 years. Certainly there has been new titles added to games that use the same basic story, control setup and progression that most game in its genre have. Even most of the new features added to games have been done in the same genre years before hand (possibly without the level of refinement).

      To a certain extent you could say that Nintendo soured my milk before my breakfast of the PS3 or XBox 360, but I have been feeling dissapointed with videogames for nearly the entire last generation; with the exception of Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Games (in particular the fantastic World of Warcraft) there have been very few games (or genres) that have demonstrated any real growth in anything except for technology. Most FPS games are following a formula that was popularized with Half-Life; most Racing games follow Grand Turismo; and most Fighting games are Tekken or Virtual Fighter. You can't say that there is much that is new in these games beyond minor technological advances in their graphics.

      I honestly think that, if Nintendo isn't remarkably popular, the videogame industry is heading for a recession; games have too big of budgets, are focused on appealing to a more and more 'Hardcore' audience, are becoming too safe, and are not focusing on producing anything new .

    64. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by KylePflug · · Score: 1
      Based on what? With $399 I could build you a reasonably nice PC (without monitor) from off the shelf components at consumer prices. Microsoft has the advantage of bulk, and the fact that most of the components are off the shelf.
      Yes, a reasonably nice PC.

      Just for fun: ZipZoomFly currently lists a Athlon XP 3200+ at $259 (OEM). Let's say, for fun, that a three-core 3.2ghz power PC costs the same as a one-core 3.2ghz (equivalent) Athlon XP. Which of course it doesn't.

      So in our fantasy, the retail for Xbox 360's GPU alone is $259. Say they get a killer bulk discount. Maybe it's all the way down to $159. Unlikely, but we're pretending all along. We're already above your "combined CPU + GPU" number.

      Now consider that in order to be even remotely competetive, the card is going to have to be pretty modern. We know it's an ATI card. We know it's DX9 and Pixel Shader 2 at least. I'm too lazy to look up more, but at the least we're talking a $250 retail card, I'd think - probably more. Once again, let's pretend Microsoft can halve this by getting a killer bulk discount -- it's still enough to push them just about up to the $300 unit cost.

      Throw in the power supply (the size of a large child), the case, the DVD, the controller (retails for almost $60 for the wired, btw), and the basic infrastructure for Xbox Live Silver (the free service). If they're getting the full deal, there's also the HDD, the headset, the wireless controller, the added costs for backwards compatibility development, yet more Live costs to recover, etc.

      I don't see how you can honestly think that Microsoft can sell a three-core 3.2ghz PowerPC with a pretty modern ATI video card, 512 of RAM, an operating system, in all probability iPod and PSP royalties to pay off, and a controller and associated included accessories for $299. That's less than probable retail for the processor alone. I'm sure Microsoft gets bulk deals and has some slippery business going on with some manufacturers, but they are still buying all the parts, still paying someone to put them together, still paying to advertise, still paying to research and design the OS and the unit, etc. Will they, in theory, make dividends when people buy a few games and get a Live subscription? Probably. But no way $299 is above cost. Not even close.
    65. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I congratulate you, sir. You have exceeded even my capacity for zealously defending a debate point that is clearly wrong.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    66. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: DVDs - I got rid of my DVD player when I got my PS2 because having two boxes in the entertainment center were redundant. So - yes - I did watch movies on it. And I'll watch Blu Ray movies on my PS3 since I'm willing to bet that the first generation of Blu-Ray players cost more than the PS3.

      So in closing, go fuck yourself - and use more baby oil this time.

    67. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Yhippa · · Score: 1
      Not only that, but won't you have to have a Media Center-equipped PC to take advantage of all these features? What if you primarly use a Mac or your computer doesn't come with Windows XP MCE? You can't upgrade unless you bought it from a retailer.

      For these reasons, I agree that this is yet another console. Its not a good thing, but it will follow the same pattern as other consoles before it.

    68. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by crontab · · Score: 1
      Yeah, they'll make a killing since they didn't spend a penny on advertising,
      One would expect that the remaining $124-$199 wouldn't be entirely eaten up by such things. $50 a unit for advertising would be extreme, and should still leave them with a margin.
      Not to be rude or anything, but how do you know that $50/unit is extreme? Do you have some evidence from other console launches or something similar (IPod mini or Nano?)
      --
      The real world is a special case.
    69. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by willabr · · Score: 1

      I use my current xbox for games, movies and music all the time.

      I think it will be intresting when It can be hooked up to the "Microsoft Live" services. I have been beta testing the "Live" products and they look pretty good.

      Many people I know would be intrested in a one-stop shop, play your moives, listen to some music, play a few games, check your email, make a blog/website. All with a small foot print box that sits on you rec room/living room shelf.

      Over the long haul, I think It will be a winner with many people. For more technicaly oriented people it will be a game console, that's it. but in the grand scheme of things, I don't think they are the products target.

      I think I'll wait a while before I buy one, maybe the price will come down.

      Today "Subscriptions" are the future, not plastics

    70. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by crontab · · Score: 1

      OTOH, why doesn't your PC come with a partition on the drive that when you boot it you choose (PC/Console), and if the latter it boots into a stripped-down, hard to hurt yourself (i.e. the rest of the harddrive is invisible) X-Box mode? One computing device, a couple of input controllers (keyboard/game-pad), and an extra S-Video output on the graphics card. Microsoft could get out of the hardware manufacturing business entirely (and the associated support and shipping channels), and just worry about content creation/licensing. Mod parent up. This is a very good idea!

      --
      The real world is a special case.
    71. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      one that someone won off that Mountain Dew contest.

      Bwahahaha! So, basically somebody who got their Xbox "360" for free doesn't even want it!

      Yeah, I'll probably blow my karma for this post. But I can't possibly be the only one scratching their head about this whole super overhyped thing.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    72. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "Maybe Microsoft could make some money off the machine if they knew how to actually design hardware rather than slapping a new case on a PC."

      The 360 is no more a PC than the GameCube or PS2. It has a custom PowerPC CPU, a custom GPU, and a unified memory architecture that is very unlike what you find in a PC.

      The GPU is the center of the 360, unlike in a PC - GPU memory (512M of GDDR3 at 700MHz) is the system memory.

      There is also no PC-style BIOS, no PCI/PCIe, no parallel ATA, no legacy I/O - the list goes on.

      As for manufacturing, I'd place the 360 "Core System" right around $300 to manufacture. There just isn't that much in the system that is expensive.

    73. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Generic+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I bought an original Xbox not to play games on, but to use as a media device.

      I agree, although I should point out that the original Xbox also works great as a game player -- an emulation game player. After sturggling for years waiting for the Dreamcast's SNES emulation to improve, I finally bought an Xbox and softmodded it. Now I have XBMC for tonnes of media playback, and some really nice SNES, Genesis, and even a few PSone games under emulation. All with just one gizmo cluttering under the television.

      With a new dashboard (Unleash) and big hard drive, you can even set up a nice menu system the kids can pick and play what they want without messy cartridges or Discs. Until the new Xbox 360 can do all that, I can't even drum up a yawn for it.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    74. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by MBraynard · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't be such a retard. Who, exactly, wouldn't sell an Xbox 360 for 10k if they had the chance? There are very few people for whom the difference between having a 360 and 10k is negligible.

    75. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by dtfarmer · · Score: 1

      2734 when I checked. That might be one or two percent of the entire US supply so far.

      Sorry, but that's misleading - there are way more than three thousand xbox 360 systems for sale on ebay. Choose "xbox 360 console" for your search and you'll find nearly five thousand - some of which do have "system" in the title, so you can't just add the two numbers for a total. And there are plenty of systems available that have neither "system" or "console" in the title.

      But check these links out:
      xbox 360 systems - nearly 11,000 up for bid.
      completed xbox 360 auctions - over 9,500 already completed.*

      At the time I'm writing this, we have over 20,000 auctions (completed/open) for the product "Microsoft Xbox 360 - Game console." Both links are only items over $100 to weed out crap that aren't systems, but there are many systems still listed under $100 (by my guess, 80-90% of the 4,000 auctions under $100 are systems.) Both links are sorted by lowest price first so you can see that they are systems.

      Now some of the completed auctions from before yesterday ended without a sale, but I'd put the number of xbox 360 systems for sale via ebay (and we're only on day 1 of launch) at least at 15,000, and probably higher...

      *must log in to view completed auctions.

    76. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      You need an Athlon64 and a top of the line video card to play Jsettlers? Are you hoping to upgrade so you can play nethack too?

    77. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      8 x 512Mb Samsung 1.2GHz GDDR3 chips ($50-70). If Microsoft is getting these for less than 6 bucks a pop, they're getting them for a STEAL.

      Now that's the most insightful thing I've heard in this thread. Ok, so we've added a $50 component to our list because Microsoft wants the best memory performance possible. NOW we're starting to get into the range of what the 360 costs.

      20GB SATA hard drive - no less than $40.

      I don't buy that. Retail SATA drives go for about $55 for an 80GIG drive. (Which, as you said, the size itself doesn't matter. The materials cost is the big thing.) I wish that Digikey sold the drives in bulk (make it easier to get proper price comparisons), but I can say that PriceWatch has 40GB SATAs for $41. Sure, you have to add the fancy enclosure, but that doesn't cost anything in bulk. I could probably get EMachineShop to do me up a few thousand for around $0.50-$1.00 a piece. (Plastic cases don't cost much. Something fancy like a Magnesium case would, but generally not plastic cases.)

      Custom motherboard including ICs, assembly and testing - $40-50, minimum.

      Minimum? No, definitely not mimimum. $40-$50 would get you a very nice motherboard at wholesale cost. The boards themselves don't cost that much to manufacture. It's the onboard ICs. Pretty much all of those ICs have a cost ranging from a fraction of a penny to less than a dollar. (Not including the CPU and Memory, of course.)

      Add in the costs of non-trivial things like the case, the powersupply, the heatsinks and fans, the controller, the remote control, final assembly, and of course, distribution

      Fans, remote controls, and the case don't cost anything. The powersupply and heatsink are reasonable points, but I was including those in the original estimate of "other stuff".

      Let's try a happy medium here:
      $30 - Mobo
      $ 2 - Heatsink
      $ 5 - Power Supply
      $10 - DVD Drive
      $ 4 - Case
      $ 1 - Remote
      $ 5 - Controller
      $15 - Hard Drive
      $10 - Wireless
      $10 - Cabling
      ---
      $82
      Anything I'm forgetting in the list above for "other" stuff?

      Now let's pull some figures out of thin air. We know that Intel manufactures their Pentium IVs for $40 a piece. We'll be conservative here and give higher figures for CPU and GPU costs. We'll also take you $50 cost for the GDDR3 RAM.
      $50 - GDDR RAM (Memory is unified, so this is the only memory cost)
      $90 - CPU
      $90 - GPU
      ---
      $230
      Now those components do put us over the top. (Even if I don't actually buy those costs.) Still, our total is $312. Microsoft should still be able to sell their XBOX 360 at $399 without a direct loss per unit. They might not actually *make* money when all is said and done, but that's a different thing altogether. Plus, there's probably still room to reduce individual component costs in the future.
    78. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Troglodyt · · Score: 1
      Why did you get a top of the line computer to play that game?

      If you haven't guessed it by now, you are not the target audience for this machine.
      You can configure your color-depth and get new drivers all day if you want to. I'll be playing my video games while you're at it...

    79. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by penguin_asylum · · Score: 0

      It doesn't really have to do with preference... Maybe they already pre-ordered one; otherwise they could just get a new one soon afterwords.

    80. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck, I'd do it in a heartbeat. 10k will finish paying off my car, buy me a decent HDTV, pay for some computer upgrades, and get me another Xbox360. (With cash left over)

      Seriously, anyone who WOULDN'T sell their 360 for 10k needs to have their head examined.

    81. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by rblancarte · · Score: 2, Informative
      Bwahahaha! So, basically somebody who got their Xbox "360" for free doesn't even want it!

      That isn't true. I had a freind who got one off that Mt Dew contest and he knew that the money he could/would get for it was worth a hell of a lot more than the entertainment value of the system. Seems like a smart investment to me. Spend nothing, get some cash for it. Hell, if I could walk into a store right now and buy a system, I totally would, just to put it on ebay.

      Damn, free market at it's best, if you ask me.

      RonB
      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    82. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Just for fun: ZipZoomFly currently lists a Athlon XP 3200+ at $259 (OEM).

      This is really dangerous territory here, because retail prices are not the same as manufacturing costs. In manufacturing costs, you make a deal with the parts provider. He's usually hoping to sell you a few tens of thousand to a few hundred thousand units. If you tell him that you need to purchase millions of units, he's going to cut you the best deal he can so that you don't get the part from someone else.

      Now from a recent article, we know that Intel's actual costs are ~$40 a chip. This gives us a more reasonable starting point. We can probably tack on another $10 since IBM isn't Intel. That gives us a guessitmation base cost of $50 for IBM. Now if IBM wants to convince Microsoft of using their chips instead of Intel's, they're going to want to provide as good of a price as possible. Let's say that they go for $90 a chip. (That's actually high given our previous assumptions, but it gives us more wiggle room for error. Especially since the XBOX uses a tri-core.)

      Now let's say that ATI has similar costs and offers a similar chip. We're at about $180 for the both of them. Or $5 north of my original guesstimate.

      Let's say, for fun, that a three-core 3.2ghz power PC costs the same as a one-core 3.2ghz (equivalent) Athlon XP. Which of course it doesn't.

      It doesn't, but it's also a bad assumption that it costs significantly more. One of the reasons for multicore designs is that they can simply etch more silicon to produce a more powerful chip than having to package more CPUs and PINs. i.e. Silicon wires don't cost anything. Pins do. Sure, their yeild won't be as high due to the larger silicon wafers, but don't count on the chips being that much bigger. According to this info on the PS3 cell (which actually has more cores than the XBOX) is 221mm^2 in size. According to this page, the Pentium IV is 146mm^2. That increase is pretty impressive when you realize that the Cell chip has 8 sub-processors in addition to the main processor. The Pentium D, btw, has a die size of 206mm^2, and it only has *two* cores.

      So in the end, the chips probably don't cost as much as you think they do.

    83. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      The 360 is no more a PC than the GameCube or PS2. It has a custom PowerPC CPU, a custom GPU

      These are really not all that different from a Mac, though the instruction set and cores have been massively expanded for the XBOX.

      a unified memory architecture that is very unlike what you find in a PC.

      You haven't seen enough PCs. My first PCjr had an SMA. Many of the modern laptops I used to send out into the field also had an SMA for video. ($#@%#@ Neologic crap) SMA is nothing new. It's actually considered worse than separate memory, but in this case it works.

      There is also no PC-style BIOS, no PCI/PCIe, no parallel ATA, no legacy I/O - the list goes on.

      True enough. All of which should drop the price of the MOBO.

    84. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "More college students have computers than televisions. Most use the computer screen *as* a television for watching DVDs or whatever movies the guy down the hall got off of the internet."

      That's because you usually share one TV with your room/appartment-mates.

    85. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your response about manufacturing means, respectfully, but the 360 has one thousand seven hundred separate components being made all over the world. It's an orginazation and inventory nightmare.

      It's also fairly common for something as complex as a game console. The key is that all of those components are shipped in bulk, meaning that they're on the factory room floor for automatic assembly. Most of the parts probably come packed in something like a tape-and-reel system which makes it very easy to automatically place (and solder) the parts on the board.

      And when I say "haggling with developers," I mean things like partial funding, partial resource supplying (free dev kits, free Macs, free dev tools, free phone support)

      Funding would be an investment, not a charge to the console. Free dev kits are an expense, but you can count that sort of thing in the dozens. (Console manufacturers don't have that many developers they're willing to haggle with.) Plus, the dev kits and the phone support should really be charged back against the Royalties Microsoft is expecting, not the XBOX hardware.

      or outright buying of the property, like MS did with Rare

      Again, this is an investment, not a charge against the XBOX.

    86. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Kuvter · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is under some crazy dellusion that this is some hook into the household which will bring more fish in. Really, it'll just bring gamers who are only loyal until the next gotta-have game pops up on the next revolutionary console.

      M$ is not under any dellustion. It's called marketing. They're trying to sell it off to non-gamers, most likely the parents of gamer kids, showing it can be used as a multimedia machine.

      --
      "To be is to do." --Socrates
      "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
      "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
    87. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by jafac · · Score: 1

      Um - ps2 has optical audio out. Xbox - not?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    88. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is Microsoft "Made in China" - do you think the MS is actually making the consoles? Have you ever heard about Flextronics?
      The pure cost of making the hardware is the smalest part of the price and it is far lower than you estimate with what components cost in US. I would say $50-$80 may be the pure cost of the hardware at the factory in China.
      The majority of money are spend elsewhere. When you sum this up the number will be huge. The business here is not in selling the hardware, but the licence for games and Live. You can't really price the hardware itself so saying MS is loosing money on each console is not really correct. It depends on how you measure things and over what period. If you sum up the R&D+manufact cost till now and divide it by the number of manufactured consoles till now then what would be the correct price of console $1000? But Flextronic will make another millions of Xbox (for mostly the same price as current ones), MS will sell them for the $400, then get money from Games and susbscription and year from now the total price of console will be $200. But see, the manufacturing cost didn't actually change at all.

    89. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, the NES was still "Officially" supported and sold through 1995... I have a nice li'l toploading NES that I'm sure I could dig out of my closet, unwrap from the protective plastic coat, and ruin it's future ebay value... then we'll know for sure.

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    90. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The XBox 360 does not consist of commidity off the shelf components. Yes the CPU is based on the PowerPC architecture, but it Microsoft had the chip custom made (what it contains, extra instructions). Yes the GPU is developed by ATI, but it too is a custom solution for Microsoft. They get bulk discounts, and these are all new chips so there is a lot of cost to recover. 150-175 for CPU and GPU in bulk sounds a little too cheap. It may be what you can expect from mid-range hardware that is mass produced. These things are only being produced for the XBox 360, and people buying now are paying a premium. Microsoft is probably praying that this will approach the 150-175 range, but as it does you can expect them to drop the price accordingly.

      Don't forget RAM. That is pretty expensive, especially for the fast stuff. :-)

      Cheesed about the price? Yes. Absolutely shocked? No.

    91. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Nightspirit · · Score: 1

      the xbox component connector has optical audio out.

    92. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by syl97 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      People are also ignoring the cost of all the IP that is going into this system. MS have bought (or extensively licenced) all the hardware, and spent huge amounts of money on the software. Last time I checked coding software to run on a proprietary hardware like the xbox 360 is extremely expensive. And to get good coders, the kind MS would require for stability and security, this is potentially going to cost more than the hardware itself. Its like saying sales of Windows are 100% profits. In actual fact the software coding costs can be just as much as hardware costs.

      In addition MS have created a huge central server system called Xbox Live which will need to be completely fail safe and have enormous bandwidth as every Xbox 360 is setup to connect to the service from the get go.

      Come to think of it, the hardware costs for the Xbox would be probably low compared with the backend Live stuff and the software coding.

    93. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty talented and I'd like an xbox 360 to hack ;-) Because Microsoft now has a custom processor, they probably won't make the same mistake of putting the initial boot code off-chip. This is the link Andrew "S" Bunnie snooped on to do the the original xbox hack (and on the 360, there was no attempt to hide the traces, so I don't think any decryption keys will travel over them). So, to dissect this box it will probably take a software exploit (like the PSP hacks), or a de-layering of the processor chip. The second approach sounds more fun, but will cost $$.

      Oh, also the mac mini has composite & s-video outputs, but you need to buy a $19 cable.

    94. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      You're preaching to the choir. In particular:

      You can't really price the hardware itself so saying MS is loosing money on each console is not really correct. It depends on how you measure things and over what period.

      This was kind of the point I was getting back to. I simply can't believe that Microsoft is actually *loosing* money on these $399 consoles. Not if they're doing their accounting in a straightforward manner. They could always charge back nicities like the LIVE service to the box itself, but that gets into "creative accounting" territory. :-)

    95. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by bombshelter13 · · Score: 1

      Just for fun: ZipZoomFly currently lists a Athlon XP 3200+ at $259 (OEM).

      Oh, please. Could you not deliberately pick one of the worst CPUs currently listed as far as price/performance goes for your example? Yes, an XP 3200+ goes for 259$ because it's old technology that is no longer being produced in the quantities it once was. XP's are a rarity in the stores now, and you'll find very few new machines shipping with them.

      Prices from the same site:
      Athlon XP 3200+, 259$.
      Athlon 64 3200+, 152$
      Sempron 3300+, 114$.
      Celeron D 345J (3.06 ghz), 121$.
      Pentium D 820 (2.80 ghz, dual core), 245$.

      Looking at these prices, you'll see that you don't have to pay anywhere near 259$ for 3.2 ghz (or the equivelant on AMD's scale, since you used it too) of processing power, and if you don't have to then Microsoft certainly doesn't either. Considering you can get a dual core 2.8 ghz CPU using the x86 architecture for 245$ and factoring in that the cores used in the XBox 360 aren't quite as individually complex as x86 cores, I certainly wouldn't be at all suprised if the price for a triple core 3.2 ghz CPU could be negotiated down to 150$ or less in quantities of (insert very, very large number here).

      You could have attempted the same argument with a more reasonable choice of CPU, and it would, if anything, have held more weight. Using an obsolete, overpriced relic of a CPU as your example just makes you look like an idiot.

    96. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Almost 30000

      This is just rediculous.

    97. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by tepples · · Score: 1

      I should point out that the original Xbox also works great as a game player -- an emulation game player.

      How much better at emulation is an Xbox than, say, my 866 MHz PC with a USB gamepad and TV-out? And how did you manage to dump all your original Game Paks into computer files for use by your emulator, or are you using these ROMs?

    98. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by tepples · · Score: 1

      "manufacturing,"? Um. Welcome to the Redundancy Department of Redundancy.

      "Manufacturing" encompasses more than parts; it's also the parts and labor of getting the factory tooled up and then operating, maintaining, and repairing the machines that assemble the console and pack it for sale.

      You need to be a little more specific than "haggling with developers".

      For one thing, R&D for development tools. For another, marketing the console to developers; promotion and contract negotiation are labor-intensive.

      They're shipping dozens to hundreds of these things to each store. The economies of scale are on their side.

      True, but the costs are still greater than zero, and they still have to negotiate contracts with stores.

    99. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah (original poster who posted this btw, too lazy to log in lol) the dude actually put it up at $100 a couple days ago and people just kept bidding it up. I think in the end they retracted it or something cuz they put the auction back to 0 bids and put the bid back to $100. It was kinda odd.

    100. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by beware1000 · · Score: 1

      the controller is crazy, but even more exciting is the promise of a game demo called.... PILOT WANGS from the crazy stuff link in the parent post. DEMO: PILOT WANGS Manipulate a biplane through the air, trying to fly through rings scattered around the Isle Delfino hub world of Super Mario Sunshine. IMPRESSIONS: This was about all the different ways the Revolution can detect tilting the controller. It was as if the controller was the airplane itself - as long as your movements weren't too sudden, the on-screen action would mimic your movements with very little lag time. After about a minute I was pulling dramatic dives and loop-de-loops, bullseye-ing plenty of rings. sounds inovative to me!

    101. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      How much better at emulation is an Xbox than, say, my 866 MHz PC with a USB gamepad and TV-out?

      Depends on what your goals are. In my case I need high WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor), and a PC by the TV doesn't have much WAF. Also a single Xbox which can emulate and play a bunch of other console's games has much higher WAF than a clutter of multiple consoles, controllers, and wires cluttered everywhere.

      As for performance it's probably similar to your PC. Xbox uses a 733MHz Celeron with a very capable vNidia GPU. But it also connects right to the TV and uses familiar gamepad controllers. I had thought about a cheap media PC, but Xbox is so cheap it didn't seem worth it. I did have to spend $25 on an Action Replay (and $8 on a used MechAssault) to do the softmod. Anyway, for most things its a heck of a lot better than my poor maligned Dreamcast, plus it plays some nice Xbox games. XBMC is a surprisingly robust media player, and if your Xbox is connected to the network you can load video and audio files from the computer in the den.

      With a new hard drive (at extra cost, of course) I've found I can copy Xbox discs to folders on the HDD and Unleash dashboard finds them automagically. This is *great* if you have kids, and there is finally a fair share of E-rated stuff out there. I'd say nicer than a computer simply because a menu is simpler than navigating an OS GUI.

      SNES emulation is flawless (except the A,B,X,Y buttons on Xbox are reversed from the old SNES pad), Genesis seems fine. Playstation (PSone) emulation is pretty good, but a big caveat is the Xbox drive won't load the games directly -- you need to make a disc image and load it onto the Xbox HDD. Your PC is probably a bit better in that regard. After doing the gyrations to get the PSone images onto the Xbox most things work ok with tweaking: Kids love Spyro the Dragon, Bob the Builder, Motor Toon Grand Prix and even the original Soul Blade(a little choppy); Parappa the Rapper works but the timing is off and hard to complete the levels (kids don't seem to care, though). There are lists online which indicate what games work and which don't.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    102. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Dunno what dorms you've been in recently, but most aren't big enough for much more than a 15" TV. Most people I knew in the dorms (granted, that was 4 years ago) watched cable on the commons TV because it was usually a big screen. I was the only guy on my floor who had a TV, and that was mainly for my PS2.

    103. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my wife bought me an xbox last xmas. i don't have enough time to really bother with a live account, but i am interested in playing back bittivo'd shows, mp3's and emulation. can you point me in the right direction for modding (soft or other) my xbox so i can use xbmc and all the other goodies you've mentioned?
      by email preferably, as i'll never find this thread again.

      genericguy (ta) diversionmary dot calm
      tia! i appreciate the help. google only gets you so far with this many options for modding available.
      -e

    104. Re: Microsoft is in for the long haul by cidco · · Score: 1

      Here is a pretty funny one on ebay, I think lots of people are getting the idea to dump them on there.

      http://cgi.ebay.com/Xbox-360-Premium-free-over-nig ht-shipping_W0QQitemZ8236510006QQcategoryZ62054QQs sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

  2. Who cares? by jmony · · Score: 0, Troll

    Will this bring peace to earth? It's just a gaming console, nothing constructive there.

    1. Re:Who cares? by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      No, more the opposite of peace on earth. We're going to see people eviscerating each other to get the last Tickle-Me XBox 360 off the shelf in time for Christmas. I'm staying away from places that have them to avoid the inevitable carnage.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Nerds who play games. I guess this is a sort of news, of interest primarily to nerds. Maybe there's a more appropriate site for this information. Whoever posted this should go find some internet site devoted to 'news for nerds'.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, my God, thank you for opening my eyes! I've wasted my life. The software I've been working on at work to make property tax estimation more accurate won't help world peace. Screw it. And neither will the guys painting the house next door, so I told them your little gem, and they've quit. We're all spreading the word, now, and pretty soon we'll get everyone together and go hold hands in the Mid-East and not let any tanks past us. The economy will be collapsing and stuff, but the economy wasn't that important for world peace anyway.

    4. Re:Who cares? by F_Scentura · · Score: 1

      Are you actively doing anything at this moment to better the earth?

      Why don't you do that instead of reading Slashdot?

    5. Re:Who cares? by hb0mb · · Score: 1

      You're right, we should stop discussing these murder simulators immediately. Then change the slashdot slogan to "News for Pacificts. Stuff that matters." And in case you were wondering, I myself dabbled in pacifism. Not in Nam, of course.

  3. Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just like the Dreamcast had, eh?

    In short, people will wait for the next-gen offerings from Nintendo and Sony.

    1. Re:Edge? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0

      It's true. The Playstation 3 has the appeal of being the top-of-the-line, Blu-ray equipped mega-machine for hardcore gamers, and the Revolution is the very affordable little machine for the general public with the cool input device. X-Box 360 is sandwiched in the middle here as an overly expensive middleground machine with no real new technologies other than processing upgrades from its predecessor and some broken backwards compatibility. PS3 and Revo will be able to play all their past games.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    2. Re:Edge? by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      In fact, Microsoft has helped ENSURE folks will wait and see how things shake out with PS3/Revolution since no regular people can get their hands on one. All the fanboys have had pre-orders since hour 1, and then there is a second and third tier waiting list of just the typical fanboi. The average Joe six-pack won't even have a crack at one until close to the PS3/Revo launches.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    3. Re:Edge? by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1
      In short, people will wait for the next-gen offerings from Nintendo and Sony.


      I didn't. Then again, I also bought a Dreamcast (although it was a year old and use), and I didn't regret it in the least.

      Even though the PS2 is the dominator of the last generation, my xbox got LOTs of amazing games, and play-time by me. If the next-gen is the same, then I have no problem! Although, I do think MS will get a larger share this time.

      Also, what happened to the recent 'no-to-Sony' boycott?
    4. Re:Edge? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      people will wait for the next-gen offerings from Nintendo and Sony.

      I know I am.
      Haven't decided which one yet, gonna see who's got the best games, but Sony has the familiarity and backwards compatibility, whilst nintendo has... an interresting gimmick.

      Speaking as the proud owner of a powerglove, I'll wait and see if it's a gimmick or a revolutionary idea before I buy it. So I might end up with a 3rd Sony console in a row, just out of a fear of the unknown.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Edge? by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Sony has the familiarity

      $sys$They have quite a bit of familiarity with your computer at least.

      Oh, sorry, could you not see that first line?

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    6. Re:Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but you are assuming that there won't be a shortage of PS3/Revolution when they come out.

      If somebody can't get a PS3/Revolution at launch because all the hardcore gamers are getting one they might go for a 360 which won't have as much shortage (if any) by then.

      It is more likely to apply to the PS3 launch however as Nintnedo doesn't seem to play that game as much nowadays.

    7. Re:Edge? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      In short, people will wait for the next-gen offerings from Nintendo and Sony.

      You're not kidding. Heck, my PS2 still has a lot of good game-hours left in it. I'm likely to wait until well *after* the PS3 has been our for a while, check out the offerings and value among the competing next-gen packages, and pick up a system in *2007*, after it's easier to determine where the best games and value can be found.

      I can wait...

      If initial reports and prices on ebay are any true indicator, people might have to wait anyway if they don't already have an Xbox360 in hand... between a planned sell-out and possibly intentional small supply over the holidays, it's not looking likely that you'll be walking into some mega store and picking one of these up before the new year...

    8. Re:Edge? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      $sys$

      Sony Music and Sony Electronics are different heads of the beast.
      Game Console DRM is nothing new, and not limited to one player. In fact, it's argued that the ease with which the Dreamcast DRM was bypassed was what precipitated it's demise.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    9. Re:Edge? by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      Why do people insist on comparing to the Xbox 360 to the Dreamcast? Microsoft is in a MUCH better position than Sega was on 9/9/99, especially in their wallets.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    10. Re:Edge? by HoboMaster · · Score: 1

      As opposed to /.'s permanent "no to Microsoft boycott?"

      --
      Remember kids, tin foil doesn't work, so use LeadHat.
    11. Re:Edge? by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

      Yeah but you are assuming that there won't be a shortage of PS3/Revolution when they come out.

      There might be, but it won't be nearly as bad nor will it be artificial. Instead if there is a shortage, it will be a sure sign of strong sales, unlike the XBox 360.

      The fact of the matter is, Nintendo has demonstrated time and time again that they are quite capable of meeting product demands even better than Sony, and that's quite a feat. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Nintendo cranks up production of the units many months in adavance and stockpiles them for release. Sony has hadn't done as well as Nintendo in this area, but they've now got the advantage of three systems worth of experience to draw upon.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    12. Re:Edge? by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Dreamcast's poor DRM precipitated it's demise?

      Well clearly that is how Microsoft has been able to turn such a profit off of the first X-Box... Crikey. Hold the press...

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    13. Re:Edge? by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      Sure. Give Microsoft the edge in console sales just because they have a small collection of bloated PC monopolies...

      I mean... Since Windows brings home the bacon, the X-box is going to succeed. Right?

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    14. Re:Edge? by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1
      Not necissarily propel them to the top. However you can't deny the fact that having a lot of cash in reserve will prevent any sort of 'oh shit we don't have the cash avalable to make another run of consoles', screwups that sealed the Dreamcast's doom.

      The point is that coming first does not mean it's has a better or worse chance at market. There were a LOT of strikes against the Dreamcast.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    15. Re:Edge? by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, even though I don't like the X-Box line of consoles.

      I do wish to know more information, though.

      I have purchased (and still enjoy) an aftermarket dreamcast, and it seems great to me now. I'm not seeing why people really thought the PS2 was worth the wait (more importantly--why they should pass up the dreamcast).

      No, I'm not one of the first to stand in line for a console, so I'm a little perplexed by this whole thread. What strikes against the Dreamcast were there?

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    16. Re:Edge? by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1
      1. The fact that a few major studios refused to support the Dreamcast. I seem to remember there being more, but it was mainly Electronic Arts. Yeah....you don't want the 1,000 ton gorilla shirking your system. 2. The PS2 was announced the same day, or shortly before, the release of the Dreamcast. Some people decided to just wait for the PS2 instead. That can't be good. 3. SEGA was EXTREMELY strapped for cash. When they realized that for the next year they had to manufacture X number of systems....and they didn't have enough money in their treasurey. Yeah...running out of money will do that oo. 4. CD-ROM Format. The CD-ROM was tired at this point,and developers were rapidly running out of space. 1.whatever GB that the GD-ROM format supported was simply not enough to hold any huge games. The Playstation had the DVD tech, which allowed a much greater amount of space.*

      So yeah...those are the ones I can think of off the top of my head.

      * "But Alex" you say, "What does this mean for the Xbox 360 and it's lack of space?" I can't really say anything as a fact, but in my opnion I don't think that the developers are quite as strapped for space as they were when the Dremcast was out. Back then, PC games were starting to come out on mutliple CD's. I have yet to see a multi-DVD game...doesn't mean they don't exist, but I haven't seen one.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
    17. Re:Edge? by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      You raise some excellent points, although I have a couple of comments to make...

      1. Not having EA on board actually improved the quality of games that the Dreamcast did see... Point in case... aside from the Sims, what's the last quality EA title you've seen... Madden 96? You are correct, though. Not having developers means fewer games... one of the problems that plagued the N64.
      2. PS2 announced that week... gah. Yeah, if I was standing in line, I'd reconsider.
      3. No cash... Ooops, sorry kid, if you give me the $$$ now, you'll get your dreamcast in 6-8 weeks. hehe.
      4. Here's where I completely disagree with you. A game does not need more than a GB to be fun and innovative. Games that could possibly even span two or three dvds scare me... Not because we don't/won't ever see them, but because that's a lot of wasted resources... disc space, production costs, etc. etc. etc. My arguments are as follows:
      * Super Mario Bros. weighed in at under 128k (?). Played that game religiously for months. Still visit it from time to time.
      * Super Mario World weighed in at under 2 MB (?). Played that game religiously for months. Just refinished it.
      * Super Mario 64 weighed in at 8 MB. PLayed that game religiously for months. Still visit it (in a recently portable version).

      Now, obviously Mario does not constitute every possibly imaginable game out there, but let's use Mario 64 as a stepping stone. At 8 megs, it was an amazing game with very little in terms of textures and prerecorded sound effects. Using MIDI(-like) music (and the fantastic Nintendo 64 Sound Processor), the score was absolutely amazing... and it was a fraction of that 8 MB. I cannot say that my gaming experience has been augmented by hearing these big name (or so they tell me...) bands playing today's latest and greatest music... With one exception. GTA actually gives me reason to enjoy a prerecorded soundtrack, and it's been done in such a way that draws you further into the game.

      Textures is something Mario 64 lacks. If we're using the GD-Roms that the DC shipped with, and we're conservative of the rest of our consumption of space... that leaves 992 Megs of free space for texture. Yup.

      So... I blame the developers for wasting all of that space. I do.

      /shrug. Well... Good Bye, Karma!

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
    18. Re:Edge? by AlexMax2742 · · Score: 1

      I was going to refute point 4 until I saw So... I blame the developers for wasting all of that space. I do.. In that case, I agree with you. You COULD still fit a quality game on a GD-ROM, even today, but the major development studios are the ones who needed tons and tons of space. It was the reason that developers passed over the N64...why be limited to expensive cartidges that held a paltry couple megs worth of space when you had CD's that could hold a million times that much.

      --
      I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion
  4. So...... by 8127972 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....... When will we see a LINUX distro for it?

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:So...... by kryten_nl · · Score: 1

      In ... 3 .... 2 ..... 1....

      --
      For the perfect anti-Unix, write an OS that thinks it knows what you're doing better than you do and let it be wrong.
    2. Re:So...... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      ....... When will we see a LINUX distro for it?

      Just before a chair is hurled through your window with a Cease and Desist letter attached to it.

      do it and we'll bury you, love steve

      So is there a sight for posting pools on the interent as to when the first article will appear on /. announcing a successful 1) Linux install 2) Mod chip ?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:So...... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Given time I bet you will. There's a version with a hard drive: it will be hacked. Personally I'm not even going to bother buying one of the things until a good modchip and some homebrew apps are out. Of course my current X-Box is doing fine in that regard right now (and I didn't even have to shell out any cash for it - I won it in a free drawing at a Microsoft event. Oh the irony :)).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    4. Re:So...... by keyrat+rafa · · Score: 1

      Way to muck the delivery. Next time the subject should be "yea but..." and the body should read, "does it run linux?" That's why you didn't go direct to +5; some moderators obviously were decieved by your rewording.

      You have 211 comments to your name. There's no excuse for not knowing the /. cliches yet.

    5. Re:So...... by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      Not until tomorrow, at the earliest. It will take a little time to et up the website. :)

    6. Re:So...... by fritzk3 · · Score: 1

      Even if you were trying to be funny, you should still eat a dick for your elitist attitude.

      --
      All your sig are belong to us.
  5. Congradulations Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your hype of limited supply and such has prompted each release location to be complete with flashing sirens and people in police uni... wait, real cops arresting some of your customers while giving lectures to others.

    1. Re:Congradulations Microsoft by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Your hype of limited supply and such has prompted each release location to be complete with flashing sirens and people in police uni... wait, real cops arresting some of your customers while giving lectures to others.

      Geez, what was the movie where the parents were knocking each other around for an action figure...

      Jingle All the Way, I think. It's probably, if you look past the humor, an actual documentary.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Congradulations Microsoft by Korexz · · Score: 1

      I worked for Toys 'R' Us for 5 years... I witnessed Tickle Me Elmo, Furby, the N64, the PS2, and the XBOX. IT happens... people get stupid about this stuff... Fights break out and the cops show up. When I worked for Zany Brainy we had grown men fighting over Beenie Babies... I am boycotting Microsoft for being sneaky and making the supply limited. This is a scam and you are all buying into it. Stick it to Microsoft and make them come up with something that is a gaming machine... not just an all in one media device that is barely an upgrade to their previous entry. The BS with the backwards compatibility... man... SNEAKY.... thats okay... Japan is where a system has to be a success to survive. Microsoft is making sure they fail this time...

  6. Fry's Line by DarkHand · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Dad works at the Fry's Electronics in Downers Grove, IL, and there was a line around the building when we got there at 7am this morning. I thought there was some kind of early Black Friday thing going on until I remembered the XBox launch date.

    1. Re:Fry's Line by lowid+(24)+_________ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, according to the BBC's "bigger perspective," gamers were "queueing" around the block. Hah. Wankers.

    2. Re:Fry's Line by ShibaInu · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really hope Insult the Comic Dog showed up at an Xbox360 line with a video camera...

    3. Re:Fry's Line by Cyclon · · Score: 1

      Who is Insult the Comic Dog?

      Are you talking about Triumph the Insult Comic Dog? If so then I agree with you 100%.

    4. Re:Fry's Line by Saige · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Best Buy in Bellevue, WA, went around the front of the building, down the side, to the back of the parking lot, then down next to and finally around the back of the Home Depot. They managed to get MORE 360s than the 266 that were originally planned, and still ended up sending a significant number of people home with paid vouchers that guarantee them a system when enough show up.

      I was in line at 7 am Monday for the midnight sale - and was #91 in line. It was quite the experience being there. I don't regret it for a second. Especially since my 360 is worth it, I can tell already.

      (BTW, never thought much of it before, but being able to stream my music from my PC to my 360 as custom soundtrack for any game just is amazing - couple that with the media player and visualizations, and my 200 CD changer is now unnecessary)

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    5. Re:Fry's Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with saying "queueing"? It's a perfectly cromulent word, even in American English.

    6. Re:Fry's Line by bleaknik · · Score: 1

      I have been violated. There have been two posts regarding a comic that I am unfamiliar with, and no one has posted a URL. What is this, the 1990s? Do I have to go to google myself? Why am I so lazy?

      --
      Deja Vu
      n. 1. The sensation that you've read this very article before.
  7. I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    All SOLD OUT at Circuit City, Best Buy, Comp USA, Toys R Us, Game Stop... Some retailers claim single-digit shipments of consoles to their stores, but I honestly believe that the shipments were much larger, but these electronics store clerks get a fringe benefit of being able to purchase the newest electronics stuff before regular consumers get a chance to. Or maybe they are buying a whole bunch from the stock, then selling on ebay at high prices. So I figure that cuts the actual available stock in half, just due to this inside scoop.

    Anyway, I'm going to fire up Call of Duty on my Mac G5 so that hopefully that will quell my itch to play a video game.

    1. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Calgary (super rich oil city for those that don't know) and from the websites of Futureshop and Best Buy there is still stores that have decent stock; I can only imagine that Walmart and Zellers (and other department stores) still have stock because people seem less likely to pre-order in those stores. Now personal evidence may not prove anything, but I suspect that either Microsoft oversupplied certain areas or the 'sell-outs' are spotty at best.

    2. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by jclast · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I know that Wal*Mart does NOT do this. My father works there (Rockford, IL), and he was told by his manager that he couldn't buy one.

      He's not even interested in it, but everybody got the same talk.

      --
      e2 | LJ
    3. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

      As was reported previously here, Microsoft actually sent LESS units than they know they'd sell, so everybody would seay in the news "OMG! ALL XBOXES ARE SOLD OUT!"

    4. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Your dad either doesn't want it bad enough or doesn't know the right people at his Wal-Mart. I have a buddy who's a Wal-Mart employee and mananged to pick up 2 of the XBox 360. He had to pay full price instead of getting his discount to keep it as hush-hush as possible but he'll still get his money's worth on EBay.

    5. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by macrom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was at Gamestop during the Dreamcast launch, and if employees got machines it was because they pre-ordered one just like the rest of the world. Games and accessories are usually available before the system launches (I saw those for Xbox 360 at Target this past weekend), and the supply problem is usually localized to the system itself. I can't remember if there was a ban on discounted games and accessories for Dreamcast, but it wouldn't surprise me.

      Employees don't get discounts on systems anyhow since there is virtually no markup on them. AFAIK, this holds true at other retailers.

    6. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jclast: He's not even interested in it

      hal2814: Your dad either doesn't want it bad enough or doesn't know the right people at his Wal-Mart

      Can't you read? He said in his post that his dad wasn't interested in it. Dumb ass.

    7. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at Best Buy for about a year and I can tell you we were NOT allowed to purchase before release date (That was the same for any product, including movies). If you worked on the release day, you had to wait until your shift was over, then you could buy it. If there was none left, tough luck. Retail stores don't like selling to their employees because employees will just pick what they want. When you sell to a customer, you can often get them to purchase multiple other items they may not need or did not think of.

    8. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Not being interested in it and not wanting one are two different things. I for one have no interest in a 360 but if I had a good way to get my hands on one, I would. The resale value of the 360 is very high right now. If I had one, it would sit new in its box until I sold it. I imagine the GP's dad was thinking the same thing if he bothered to ask about buying one in the first place.

      Moron.

    9. Re:I tried to find a store in Maryland... SOLD OUT by jclast · · Score: 1

      That's where the confusion here is then. My dad isn't interested in owning or selling one. Every employee of the store got the same talk at an all hands. He didn't even know what it was until he asked me on the phone last night.

      Sorry I wasn't more clear.

      --
      e2 | LJ
  8. To the edge and beyond by Dobeln · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Some gamers have gone to even greater extremes - like the man who robbed an Electronics Boutique store in Stafford, Virginia in the early hours of this morning. According to US website GameSpot, he held the store manager up at gunpoint and ordered him to hand over two Xbox 360s. Presumably ones with hard drives."

    Gee, Microsoft are really taking viral marketing to new heights here. Move over iLoveBees... ;)

    1. Re:To the edge and beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What!!! I just caught the news article. That store is right down the street from me!! F'ing amazing. Haha....my small little town is on the map.

    2. Re:To the edge and beyond by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

      Nice. I live in the area of this. Here's a link to an artical relating to it.

      http://xbox.boomtown.net/en_uk/articles/art.view.p hp?id=9880

    3. Re:To the edge and beyond by Blurredplacebo · · Score: 1

      jennifer government anyone?

  9. I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I would like to see a TCO report between this, the PS3 and the revolution. I'm seriously thinking of investing in a game console.

    1. Re:I don't know... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Revolution would win hands down:

      1. It's rumoured to have a lower price tag.
      2. You get free access to Nintendo's back catalog of games (excl. GCN games) going back to 1985.

      Therefore, right out of the box, you've got access to tons of games. And if you're in your late 20's or 30's, you probably won't need much more than those games. Throw in a couple physically-oriented games that use that gyroscopic wand and you're all set.

    2. Re:I don't know... by reedsr · · Score: 1

      Could I get a link validating the claim of access to games going back to 1985 ? (excluding GC of course)

      --
      "Is Sausage bad for printers?"
    3. Re:I don't know... by Zigg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not free access. Many, many Nintendo reps (including president Iwata) have gone on record saying not free. You'll pay. You won't pay much, but you'll pay.

    4. Re:I don't know... by Golias · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Could I get a link validating the claim of access to games going back to 1985

      I believe the apt onomatopoeia for this situation is "woosh."

      The post you are responding to is a good example of the need for a "sarcasm" tag around here. No matter how obvious your ironic humor is, there's always a few people who will reply before realizing the intention of your remarks.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:I don't know... by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      From this presentation Reggie is on record as saying:

      Revolution's first announced appeal serves both groups: our virtual console concept. It not only offers direct backward compatibility to all GameCube software, but via downloading, to a library of games that spans the entire 20 years of Nintendo's console history. For the higher age group, this is a nostalgia trip -- and an emotionally-charged one, at that. How many devices allow you to relive part of your youth? At the same time, most of those games are in fact brand new titles even to those approaching their 20s. To borrow another movie analogy, The Wizard of Oz is a revelation the first time you see it no matter how many years after it was filmed. In our industry, Nintendo owns the equivalent of the back libraries of MGM, United Artists and Paramount put together. Virtual console is a direct pipeline to new, simplicity-seeking, blue ocean customers. And these are proven, high-quality game experiences that we an, of course, make available at a far more affordable price than current hits.

      It's a great presenation, and you can download a video of it from IGN.

    6. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW 1 line of a 5 line post that is intending to be ironic/sarcastic and it makes someone a dumbass? the rest of the content of that post would be reasonable to believe especially coming from a fanboy. I guess everyone is supposed to follow all aspects of every console at all times so that everyone that ever reads that post would know for sure that it was not intended to be taken seriously. Ass

    7. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was AWESOME

      (for the record, not said "ironically")

    8. Re:I don't know... by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... "a far more affordable price than current hits" isn't quite free. This is the same company that charged $20 for decade (and a half)-old NES ports on the GBA. But don't get me wrong, I can't wait.

      --
      "This is considered plagiarism."
    9. Re:I don't know... by Golias · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I guess everyone is supposed to follow all aspects of every console at all times so that everyone that ever reads that post would know for sure that it was not intended to be taken seriously. Ass

      Oh, come on! The guy was posting that the ability to play the likes of SuperMario Brothers and Bad Street Brawler was all gamers in their 20s and 30s need to be choose the Revolution over the PS3 or the new X-Box. Read his post again, the whole thing is hilarious!

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    10. Re:I don't know... by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Funny


      Could I get a link validating the claim of access to games going back to 1985 ? (excluding GC of course)

      Try as I might, I can't really see the word "free" in there. I can't even make it up out of the letters it contains, unless I wrote 1985 out as words.

    11. Re:I don't know... by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 1

      That was still written in response to a post that claimed the games would be free. Kthxbye.

      --
      "This is considered plagiarism."
    12. Re:I don't know... by Comboman · · Score: 1

      If it is as easy to hack as the original XBOX, then it does indeed have the lowest Total Cost of Ownership since there's no need to buy games.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    13. Re:I don't know... by drspooky · · Score: 1

      The proper tag to indicate sarcasm is to follow your statement with a percent sign.

      Example: God, everyone knows about the sarcasm tag.%

    14. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "wand" isn't gyroscopic.

    15. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have a feeling it's going under a subscription model. meaning that even once you download the games if you let the subscription lapse they won't play anymore (until you renew). if that's the case the fee may seem small like say $10 a month, but if you use the revolution for the next 5 years... that's $600 you've paid to the big N. for access to up to 20 year old games. then again over the next 5 years you could play 500 different games and more than get your money's worth, but who has that kinda time who can afford $10 a month ;)

      i definitely find this concept very cool, the only cooler thing would be if the revolution could write downloaded games out to flash memory cards so they could be played on the DS ;) (the nintendo DS uses flash memory cards, that's why the cards are so much smaller than GBA titles)

      i'm also curious what nintendo has dreamed up for it's next portable console.. I can't imagine them being happy competing the DS vs the PSP once sony can make profits at lower unit pricing.

    16. Re:I don't know... by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Given that Nintendo's remakes have cost anywhere from $20-40 (look up SMB3 for GBA), I'd venture it'll be a decent cost. Think $10 a game. That adds up if I want to match all the games already in my emulation collection (many of which I owned carts for at one point).

    17. Re:I don't know... by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you they tag that on having to make an emulator for the portable, and then to create the cartridges. Bandwidth is cheaper, especially considering that the NES games are 1mb. They need room to scale up too, as I wouldn't doubt that the N64 games will cost more than the SNES, which will cost more than the NES. No one will buy into this on a large scale if it isn't inexpensive enough. The whole backwards compatibility thing could be a huge selling point.

    18. Re:I don't know... by oztiks · · Score: 1

      The only problem I see with purchasing a ps3 is the fact that as soon as you plug it in it will set itself up with a GPS tracking device pin pointing the exact whereabouts and trajectarory of your house pets, an in house surveillance unit with a video / audio feed that goes straight back to sonyhq, and will begin infecting all surrounding technology with it's drm rootkit that you'll find next to impossible to remove from your dvd player!

    19. Re:I don't know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've still got my N64 and I've been playing some of the games recently. Mario 64 and Golden Eye are still wonderful. But I'm really not keen on paying for something I already own a second time. However, my N64 and controllers are getting unreliable - I would definitely buy a Revolution if Nintendo offered an optional N64 cartridge adapter.

    20. Re:I don't know... by Richard+Frost · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... president Iwata... [has] gone on record saying not free. You'll pay. You won't pay much, but you'll pay.

      This Iwata guy has got to be the nicest super villan ever.

    21. Re:I don't know... by tepples · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you they tag that on having to make an emulator for the portable

      They didn't really need to develop their own.

      No one will buy into this on a large scale if it isn't inexpensive enough.

      They will if you compare $35 (half the price of an N64 game when new) with $150,000 (maximum statutory damages for copyright infringement).

    22. Re:I don't know... by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      I meant, people won't spend money on that "inferior" N64 game at all. Period. They'll just buy a 360 or PS3 and buy normal games, no difference. If it's too expensive, it is no longer a terrific selling point for the console.

      I didn't factor in pirating an N64 game: most people wouldn't do that, waste the time finding it, and some that would only do it because they're too cheap to buy the stuff. Personally, if I could buy a console that let me put down say $10 to quickly buy and download a fun game, and have it stored on the console or available to stream whenever I want to play it, I would definately pay for that convenience. I don't want to waste time trying to fiddle around with emulators on my PC and downloading things and trying to get a suitable gamepad hooked up and whatnot.

      And I forgot about PocketNES, think I read on GBADev that it was used or something. My stupid inconsistant memory :/

    23. Re:I don't know... by tepples · · Score: 1

      And I forgot about PocketNES, think I read on GBADev that it was used or something.

      Nintendo developed its own emulator to run NES titles within Animal Crossing and allow them to be "multibooted" from the GameCube to the GBA. This emulator, dubbed "acNES" by the pirate community, was later used in the e-reader and Classic NES Series. Some ROMs had to be hacked to get them to work correctly in the emulator, and it only supported a few mappers.

      Jaleco, on the other hand, used PocketNES for its classics collection. PocketNES is more accurate than acNES could ever hope to be.

  10. Yes. by mekkab · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw Israelis and Palestinians settling their differences and playing a nice game of Perfect Dark Zero together.

    This is truly a groundbreaking new system!

    /Got Gamertag?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Yes. by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but then the parents of these two ten year olds saw the heracy, and killed their sons. Groundbreaking, indeed.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  11. MS holding out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ya think Microsoft has more than enough money to make enough units to go around for the inital launch? Or is it some kind of stunt to make people want it more?

    1. Re:MS holding out? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Don't ya think Microsoft has more than enough money to make enough units to go around for the inital launch? Or is it some kind of stunt to make people want it more?

      This is the history of Christmas Toys. Cabbage patch kids, various DVDs, etc. A shortage creates a frenzy. Where people wouldn't normally have given the object a second look, they now feel they must have one. Great stuff if you're the seller.

      Expect the shortage to continue, yet the bottleneck to clear just in time for several more million sales, but not so there's the least perception of excess inventory, which will mean it's suddenly passe'.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:MS holding out? by tomcres · · Score: 1
      This is the history of Christmas Toys. Cabbage patch kids, various DVDs, etc. A shortage creates a frenzy. Where people wouldn't normally have given the object a second look, they now feel they must have one. Great stuff if you're the seller.

      And people beating each other in the aisles and spending 10x what it's worth.. it's sickening. This is a game, not food! A shortage shouldn't create this kind of hysteria. Yet another reason not to do Christmas.

    3. Re:MS holding out? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      And people beating each other in the aisles and spending 10x what it's worth.. it's sickening. This is a game, not food! A shortage shouldn't create this kind of hysteria. Yet another reason not to do Christmas.

      Wars were probably started over lesser things... but not much lesser.

      Oh, do Christmas, but don't do it with toys. Give the kids a gift in kind or take a trip somewhere they want to go.

      I see no point in deluging kids with expensive presents. One thing they want and everything else what they need. Funny, I seem to have learned something from my parents after all.

      Oh, yeah. Remember to keep your TV unplugged during October to January.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  12. The difference is.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Edge? Just like the Dreamcast had, eh?

    The difference is, Dreamcasts are still fairly interesting. Seems Sega gave up on it too soon.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. How many did they sell? any preliminary stats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have preliminary stats or educated guesses as to how many they sold? I think on averaqge each best buy got about 50 consoles. Dunno walmarts.

  14. Future news by Gogo0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So is games.slashdot.com going to shut down, now?
    Without Xbox2 news, the page will be barren until the Xbox3 hype begins... in a few weeks.

    Nevermind.

  15. Ridiculous people by op12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently some people are willing to pay over a thousand bucks for one.

    --
    For those that haven't gone blind yet (article minus the blinding blue theme): http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/22/174625 1&tid=211

    1. Re:Ridiculous people by NetFusion · · Score: 1

      The winning bid was $2,075.00

    2. Re:Ridiculous people by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh my goodness, that thing finished at over $2K. I wonder what are the odds of him actually collecting that $2K? That said, I count 6 unique bidders over $1K on that XBox.

      Then again $2K isn't a large slice of the XBox marketing budget. It might be worth it to Microsoft for breathless media reports of XBoxes going for $2K on EBay.

    3. Re:Ridiculous people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what are the odds of him actually collecting that $2K?

      But he's bound to get the money. He says that if he doesn't then he'll be forced to leave negative feedback. Negative feedback!

    4. Re:Ridiculous people by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Apparently some people are willing to pay over a thousand bucks for one.

      Dude, I've seen eBay listings at over $2k, and I've heard earlier in this thread that one has sold for $5k.

      My original thesis was this: People's intelligence halves in front of a computer.

      My new one: People's intelligence quarters in front of a game console.

      I'm at a loss here. Are these the only ones being manufactured? Or is having a new toy now just that important?

    5. Re:Ridiculous people by op12 · · Score: 1

      Maybe ebay is an additional halving, or the number of bogus bids is really that high and none of these sellers are going to collect anything.

  16. and the x-box? by jspectre · · Score: 1

    so. what happens to the xbox now? discontinued? discount bin at odd lots? are they expecting developers to code for the PS2, x-box and 360?

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    1. Re:and the x-box? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sony's still selling the PSOne (small type) so why shouldn't Microsoft keep selling the Xbox?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:and the x-box? by dsyu · · Score: 1

      so. what happens to the xbox now? discontinued? discount bin at odd lots?

      I've heard rumors (which of course may be completely unfounded) that MS is basically discontinuing the old X-Box, wrapping up manufacturing of what they have left, and that's it. It would be very much along the lines of MS to do this -- they generally tend to avoid supporting/selling older version of their software as soon as a new version is available. Sony, on the other hand, kept selling PS1's after the PS2 came out for a while, which was basically gravy for them. There's a market for "late-adopters" or folks who otherwise can't afford the latest and greatest but would still like to get Timmy a console for Christmas.

    3. Re:and the x-box? by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The original Xbox is without a doubt the WORST console lifespan of all time. Even ill fated systems hung on for longer and continued active development. 4 years for a system is not a good value, and just ensures that programmers have YET to even fully tap into the system. When console makers *cough* Sony/MS *cough* only pump out systems based on horsepower, hype and profit, they go stale much quicker. I can't see the 360 or PS3 making any lasting impact either due to the massive development costs and time investments.

      Getting back to the games, and opening the doors of the target audience to the average family and regular folks is the real path to success. If Nintendo doesn't drop the ball, they have this one in the bag. There has never been so much demand for a decently priced, family game system. The ages of older NES/Atari gamers are out of PS3/360 demographics and they generally have budding families... could be time for a Revolution.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    4. Re:and the x-box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess thats why support for windows 98 was just recently stopped ...

    5. Re:and the x-box? by steveo777 · · Score: 1
      I believe the main difference between selling the PSOne and X-Box would be profit. Microsoft still loses money on every X-Box they produce. They've also halted all their 1st party developement of X-Box games and are concentrating resources upon the 360.

      Sony's PSOne sells at a profit and they don't need to make large quanties of the units for that profit (almost every part, IIRC is manufactured in-house).

      So, it only makes sense to produce legacy devices that will turn a profit. Perhaps Microsoft could make a (much) smaller version of the old X Box that was fully compatible (which is feasable these days) with the old library with all embedded technology on a single board with a HDD and DVD rom, but it's not likely seeing as they'd need nVidia's cooperation.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    6. Re:and the x-box? by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      This would make sense, since the XBox isn't a whole lot cheaper to make now as it was when it was introduced. Microsoft doesn't own the IP to the chips in the first Xbox, so it has to buy the chips at whatever prices the contracts with Intel and Nvidia dictate. The price of hardrive probably hasn't dropped much either - (the cheapest hardrives are always around $50, regardless of the capacity). So, Microsoft is still probably losing money on every Xbox sold, (perhaps worse now then when the system was introduced). Why would they want to continue this?

      I'm willing to bet a large part of the reason for the early introduction of the Xbox 360 is to reverse this trend, not simply to beat PS3 to market. If you look at the design choices of the 360 - no hardrive in the basic edition, buying the IP rather than buying the chips, you realize Microsoft learned from their mistakes with the first Xbox.

    7. Re:and the x-box? by Chemical · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, nVidia has discontinued production of the original Xbox's GPU. So once existing stocks run out, they won't be able to produce any more Xboxes.

  17. It launched? by BushCheney08 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It launched already??? Why haven't I heard anything about this yet?!?! The slashdot editors need to get off their asses and help hype this thing a little bit...

    --
    Be a real patriot: Question authority. Think for yourself. Formulate your own conclusions.
    1. Re:It launched? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am fortunate enough (sarcasm detectors on) to work on the top floor of one of the buildings belonging to the XBox division (no, I don't work for M$). This place has been a freakin' zoo all morning. Shuttle buses are bringing Microsoft employees from Main Campus every 10 minutes to pick up Xbox consoles. There have probably been a couple hundred given out so far to M$ employees. Balloons. Green carpets. A sandwhich-board wearing dope waving at the gravel trucks as they drive by. Yesterday there were a couple of limos blocking all traffic access.

      No word whether or not the employees got company pricing on the hardware or not. But there are sure a lot of them here....

      Wouldn't be so bad, if they weren't stealing OUR reserved parking spots (there aren't enough to go around). I wish M$ would remember that they are TENANTS, and they don't own the freakin' building. Grr.

      If you're curious where the XBox and Bungie divisions live, here's a Google Maps link below:
      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=18300+NE+Union+Hill+ Road,+Redmond,+WA&ll=47.678139,-122.096386&spn=0.0 04941,0.012883&t=k&hl=en

    2. Re:It launched? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering that we cannot buy an X-Box (360 or not) from the company store, we don't get any discount whatsoever. we need to buy it just like everybody else at EB/BestBuy/etc. now, maybe things are different for the people who work on X-Box, but not for the rest of the company.

  18. Long lines == No food by doctela · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow those guys really must be going without food

  19. Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you will see that this machine really is well done and offers lots of useful features. It is very well thought out and if you opt for the harddrive you get even more options.

    I was actually impressed with its ability to work with other devices to include an iPOD and PsP. The nice thing about this machine is that it really is expandable as wireless gives them many options. You will probably see an addon keyboard/mouse combo one day.

    There are many of us out here who don't need our PCs to program on, we have them for games, other entertainment, e-mail, and surfing. Give me an insta-on box with those features and I may just consider it. The XBOX360 is actually the first console I am seriously considering because of the potential.

    Playing DvDs is a bonus, if it means one less component I have to hook up or keep up with all the better. People harped on the PS2 for the same reason yet I know many who have one for that very reason.

    Just because its Microsoft doesn't make it wrong which seems to be your whole beef against it. (who made it)

    (allow me to run some IBM style emulator/vpn over the net with a wireless keyboard and I really really need a PC even less)

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      you will see that this machine really is well done and offers lots of useful features. It is very well thought out and if you opt for the harddrive you get even more options.

      Yeah. There've been a pile of really well done consoles. I know there were, I just can't remember their names anymore because after a couple years something new and more exciting came along.

      Those who must have the XBox 360 are gamers. Nobody is going to stand in line, freezing their butt off for a Media Center when they can get one just fine in a month or two, when the phoney bottleneck is cleared.

      Tell me how loyal gamers are to hardware.

      In 2 years they'll be multi core, Wi Fi - take it with you and doing stuff that makes this look like an ugly doorstop.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by HanzoSpam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was actually impressed with its ability to work with other devices to include an iPOD and PsP. The nice thing about this machine is that it really is expandable as wireless gives them many options. You will probably see an addon keyboard/mouse combo one day.

      There are many of us out here who don't need our PCs to program on, we have them for games, other entertainment, e-mail, and surfing. Give me an insta-on box with those features and I may just consider it. The XBOX360 is actually the first console I am seriously considering because of the potential.


      That's the point I think is being missed. After everything is said and done, the thing is still, design-wise, pretty much a glorified PC. Microsoft has come out with a proprietary platform which they're using the gamer market to propagate. They can gradually add other functionality to increase it's market.

      Don't be surprised when it eventually evolves into what amounts to the Microsoft version of the Mac.

      --

      Progressivism: Parasites helping parasites to help themselves - to other people's stuff.
    3. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Tezkah · · Score: 1

      Don't be surprised when it eventually evolves into what amounts to the Microsoft version of the Mac.

      No. Microsoft refused to let people connect keyboards and mice to the original Xbox. Why? Because they don't want to make this become a PC.

      This is more trying to be Microsoft's version of the TiVo. Even that comparison isn't really apt, its just a console that wants to be everything to everyone.

    4. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      they're using the gamer market to propagate. They can gradually add other functionality to increase it's market. Don't be surprised when it eventually evolves into what amounts to the Microsoft version of the Mac.

      Or evolve into your media box you hook cable/satellite feed into and they dictate how you receive, what you receive and track it all.

      I'd honestly be worried, but like I said these things will only be hot for a couple years then it'll be the next big thing.

      Another problem with them will be life-span. If you're using it for CD/DVD entertainment then how long can you expect to get parts when the drive stops tracking?

      Just go down to the shop with the flickering neon VCR Repair sign and ask, I'm sure in a few years they'll have a pile of these which customers abandoned which they scavenge parts from.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by RoadDoggFL · · Score: 1

      MS didn't want the Xbox to be a PC because Kevin Bachus and Seamus Blackley were onboard. Don't fool yourself, this isn't the Xbox. It's the Xbox 360, and with it MS is playing Sony's game and inching console gaming towards the PC.

      --
      "This is considered plagiarism."
    6. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by badasscat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's the point I think is being missed. After everything is said and done, the thing is still, design-wise, pretty much a glorified PC. Microsoft has come out with a proprietary platform which they're using the gamer market to propagate. They can gradually add other functionality to increase it's market.

      What, you mean kinda like this?

      The fact of the matter is every console is pretty much a "glorified PC" (or a "dumbed down" PC, depending on your perspective), and every single time - yes, every single time a new console is released, the manufacturer claims that it's going to do this, that and the other thing eventually, or that it's going to converge a whole bunch of devices into one. This is true going all the way back to the Odyssey II and Atari 2600, which also promised PC functionality. The Sega CD and NEC Turbo CD were the first (or among the first) to then promise home entertainment functionality once optical storage became the norm.

      The reality is people just don't care. A few do, and those are the kind of people that sued Mattel when they never actually released their promised keyboard component from lack of interest (they only had something like 4,000 orders, which meant they couldn't get the component cost low enough to make a profit). Those people can be very vocal. They're the real hardcore. They're on the internet complaining when companies don't release promised add-ons, they're the ones that always have to be the contrarians when someone like me points out that they're the minority.

      But they are the extreme, extreme minority. I agree with the parent poster who said as soon as the next hot console comes along, gamers will abandon the Xbox 360, because it really is about the games and only about the games, and it always will be. This is not going to be some great window into the living room. It is simply the console of the moment, and in five years it will be forgotten like every other console of the moment. MS is not creating some sort of home entertainment "standard" with the Xbox 360.

      It never ceases to amuse me how people say the exact same things every time a new console is released. "It's going to do all these great things besides playing video games! It's revolutionary!" Ha! So in other words, it's just like every other console ever.

    7. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by b4k3d+b34nz · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What's the difference between an XBox 360 and a Mac?"

      "Nothing, neither has games! HAHAHAHA!"

      --
      Grammar Lesson: you're is a contraction of "you are"; your means you possess something; yore means days gone by.
    8. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Now that they support HD more fully, it really could be used as a PC. The thing holding back all the crappy WebTV type systems has always been resolution. Now, find me one person in America that has an HDTV and no computer and I'll be shocked.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    9. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't fool yourself, this isn't the Xbox. It's the Xbox 360, and with it MS is playing Sony's game and inching console gaming towards the PC.


      I'd almost believe this except that I've heard approximately jack and shit with regards to in game keyboard and mouse support (supposedly an MS employee said keyboards are fine.. for text input only). RTS or FPS with an Xbox controller? No thanks. I've got the latest keyboard and mouse adapter on my Xbox and it blows goats, so that's not an option either.

      You listenin' Sony? Drop the B.S. rootkits and give me a goddamn keyboard and mouse for in-game use on the PS3 and we're set! I would love to quit spending stoopid bucks on a new graphics card every year.. and before anybody utters "well, my stuff plays just fine on my GeForce2MX".. load up Battlefield 2 and start crying. Even with cranking the eye candy down my plain vanilla GeForce 6800 has fits.
    10. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by melbafuckingtoast · · Score: 1

      They're for the Eyetoy, the Guncon, and oh, for plugging in a little dongle to get around the copy protection...

    11. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by SuperRob · · Score: 1

      There's a keyboard, network adapter, wifi, the EyeToy, etc. ... Not to mention the System Link ability from Day One. You must not have looked very hard.

      I use my Microsoft wireless keyboard and mouse for Final Fantasy Online.

    12. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Boltronics · · Score: 1

      The GNU/Linux kit for the PS2 included a USB keyboard and mouse. http://playstation2-linux.com/faq.php#What_is_in_t he_kit

      --
      It's GNU/Linux dammit!
    13. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by internewt · · Score: 1
      Gran Turismo 4 can save screenshots to USB memory sticks as .jpgs, and so can be moved from the console to a PC, and you can then do (debatably) useful stuff. Oh, and some controllers are USB - Logitech steering wheels for one.

      So I don't know if Sony put a use to them but 3rd parties have.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    14. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by sunwolf · · Score: 1
      "It's going to do all these great things besides playing video games! It's revolutionary!"
      Ironically, Nintendo's Revolution only plays videogames.
    15. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by MrKahuna · · Score: 1
      "What's the difference between an XBox 360 and a Mac?"

      "One doesn't have any games, people keep saying the other will become the ultimate do everything media device."

      You decide which is which.

    16. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      I hope console manufacturers never listen to this. The last thing I want is to have to figure out how to use a KB/mouse while I'm sitting on my couch in the living room.

      Seriously, are they going to come out with Xbox360 lap trays that are color coordinated with the consoles faceplate? No thanks.

    17. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by jatemack · · Score: 1

      Link is toast....
      here you go....

      --
      // no
    18. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could this be the M$ Mac? It has games, unlike the Mac. Get your FUD straight, please.

    19. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I hope console manufacturers never listen to this. The last thing I want is to have to figure out how to use a KB/mouse while I'm sitting on my couch in the living room.

      Seriously, are they going to come out with Xbox360 lap trays that are color coordinated with the consoles faceplate? No thanks.


      Did I say you would be required to use a mouse and keyboard? No, I didn't.. but thanks for playing. By default the current '360 controllers would likely be supported by default so you wouldn't be required to use a mouse and keyboard. Alas I suspect you fear what most of the Xbox brigade already know: with a keyboard and mouse folks coming from the PC world would own your asses with ease on Xbox live.
    20. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      i believe a few games supported usb keyboards/mice and there was the linux kit of course.

      and i know there was at least one game that supported lan gaming through firewire.

      i belive the intention was to turn the PS/2 into a media centre type machine but the closes they got afaict was the linux kit which was expensive and didn't allow the use of the hard drive it came with for anything game related (the physical hard drive was the same as the one they sold for game related stuff but it could only be formatted for one or the other)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      didn't linking use the firewire port not the usb ports?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I use a mouse and keyboard just fine when I play PC FPS's. It's cool to use a keyboard and mouse at my desk. It's STUPID to want to use them in the living room.

      I can just see you crouched over your coffee table 'pwning n00bs' with your leet skills. I'd rather be comfortable when I game. But I guess I'm crazy.

    23. Re:Actually if you read the HARDOCP review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      allow me to run some IBM style emulator/vpn over the net with a wireless keyboard and I really really need a PC even less
      Somehow, I doubt M$ is interested in promoting the loss of Windows sales.
  20. Hmm. by PenisLands · · Score: 1, Redundant

    There doesn't seem to be much new or interesting about the Xbox360 or then other next gen machines (apart from the nintendo revolution). It just seems to have more RAM, faster processor, etc. Thinking about it, what will the next generation consoles do that the current ones (gamecube, Xbox, etc) couldn't? Maybe games will have better graphics, but it seems to me like graphics have gotten as good as they really need to be.

    1. Re:Hmm. by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Informative
      There doesn't seem to be much new or interesting about the Xbox360 or then other next gen machines (apart from the nintendo revolution). It just seems to have more RAM, faster processor, etc. Thinking about it, what will the next generation consoles do that the current ones (gamecube, Xbox, etc) couldn't?

      PS3 - BluRay DVD. That'd be the big one.

    2. Re:Hmm. by Comen · · Score: 1

      People seem to really be missing out on the fact that this is the first console I have seen that really is impressive.
      If you have not seen one in a store on HDTV then you are missing whats up!
      This is a BIG deal, like looking at a normal NTSC old console game then looking at a 1024x768 PC game and comparing them.
      Go look at it before you says its just more RAM faster processor etc...
      And if you did and didnt notice the HDTV its hooked to, and think that nots making a difference, then you are lost.
      As far as I am concerened HDTV is the biggest benefit to console gaming that could have happened. Blue Ray DVD might be nice but this is more important, it took how long for us to break the NTSC barrier on the console? and the XBOX 360 was the first to do it.
      The regular XBOX was supposed to do some of this, but I never saw it, and looking at the 360 in stores is ngith and day over anything else I have seen do HDTV gaming.

    3. Re:Hmm. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Maybe a year or so down the line. Right now there's little to no BluRay content. And even if there was- what advantage does it have over DVD? The vast majority does not have HD TVs, and will not for a long while. So there's no reason to go blue-ray over normal DVD.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    4. Re:Hmm. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Great, we're sorry we missed that you think it's impressive.;) But hey, when the rest of the planet buys their super-duper HDTV to play Dead or Alive (more boobies!!!!) we'll all be suitably as impressed as you are. :)

      Seriously though... think about the market penetration of HDTV right now... it's not that huge, and if that is the defining moment of this console... most of the early adopters are going to miss it, tell their friends it might not be as super as Microsoft said, and people will not scoop this wonderful console up in droves because it just doesn't offer much to the average consumer who hasn't spent $2K on a TV. (The "huge drop" in HDTV prices hasn't come yet. It's a big gamble to think it will soon, too. They're still pretty expensive, just no longer prohibitively so for 99% of the population. Now it's more like 70%.)

      Sorry, I saw it on HDTV and it looked like a computer game. I've got a computer. I don't need another $400 one, which requires a $2000 accessory to make it better than the consoles I have.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    5. Re:Hmm. by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Do I have an HDTV? Am I planning on getting one in the remotely near future? (Hint: No.)

      Is this answer the same for 98% of the public? (Hint: Yes.)

      So... who cares? Other than a couple of random Slashbots, I mean.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    6. Re:Hmm. by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Except the games are still all the same. Madden is still the same as madden from last year, just sharper less aliased graphics. Platformers are still the same jump and run and shoot. FPS are all the same find the key, kill some guys and move on. Everything is exactly the same as before. Only difference is less jaggies. 720p is about all you are going to get out of this generation. You'll be lucky if a game comes out in 1080i. Meanwhile I can do those ultra high resolutions on the same games on my pc (even connected to my hdtv if I want to). So why spend 500-600 on a console on release day to play games that are nothing but poorly compiled tech demos?

    7. Re:Hmm. by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6283333.html ?display=Breaking+News

      Seems you're not right at all. I'm not a console gamer so I couldn't care less about the Xbox360's HD abilities, but HDTV is great. Almost everything I watch is HDTV (though not all) and there are more channels coming online every day.

    8. Re:Hmm. by Opie812 · · Score: 1

      People seem to really be missing out on the fact that this is the first console I have seen that really is impressive.

      Who are you that *I* should care what you think? ME: "OMG!! COMEN IS IMPRESSED BY THE XBOX360!!!"

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    9. Re:Hmm. by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      If you have not seen one in a store on HDTV then you are missing whats up!

      I don't have an HDTV at home... what's the point of buying an Xbox360 then?

      As far as I am concerened HDTV is the biggest benefit to console gaming that could have happened.

      As far as I am concerned, good gameplay is the biggest benefit to console gaming that could have happened. I can't afford an HDTV.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    10. Re:Hmm. by Quetzo · · Score: 1

      Do you think MS might be able to introduce HD-DVD or Blu-Ray capability into the XBOX 360 down the line? What sort of hardware/software mods will that require? They could simply let Sony duke it out over format and pick the winner when the dust settles.

    11. Re:Hmm. by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      games bigger than 9GB are not that hard to envisage (and disc changing sucks).

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    12. Re:Hmm. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Disc changing happens rarely though. Thats even less of a selling point than Bluray DVDs.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    13. Re:Hmm. by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      that's my point, that the 9GB limitation is likely to restrict design of games within a few years, i believe. having more space on one disc could reasonably make a difference to what kind of games are practical, because of this need to reduce disk swapping. producing high res content quickly eats space.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    14. Re:Hmm. by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      They could....but then what happens when developers want to start releasing for HD-DVD/Blu-ray. People will be forced to upgrade. There are quite a few people that would run out, but a game, then realize it won't work in their system. Then, they would have to shell out >$100 for the new player, install it, yadda-yadda-yadda.....bad things for MS.

    15. Re:Hmm. by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Maybe a year or so down the line. Right now there's little to no BluRay content. And even if there was- what advantage does it have over DVD? The vast majority does not have HD TVs, and will not for a long while. So there's no reason to go blue-ray over normal DVD.

      Well, fortunately, the PS3 is coming out a year or so from now... But I know that's not what you meant.
      Seriously, though - content providers will start pushing out BluRay titles once they know that there's an installed base of players... which Sony will have in the PS3. As a result, you'll start seeing higher-def movies, and bigger games. The main difference is going from the 9GB limitation of DVD to 50GB of space.

      Look at it this way - when CD-ROM first came out, people were saying that you'd never need so much space, because MS-Word could fit on two floppies. Content expands to fill the available space.

    16. Re:Hmm. by Comen · · Score: 1

      Sorry if all you people dont have a HDTV at home, I could care less, by saying you dont have one so therefore its not important is just stupid.
      It is still the biggest thing to hit a console ever.
      The PC has always had a huge advantage over a console for years, the main reason this is, is because of the fact that they can make the console themselves better and better but we still use TV tech from the 40s or 50s.
      Now I for one have been sreaming way before HDTV on why we dont do something to make this better. And I would think in the slashdot crowd there would be more people that are ready for console that take this advantage or atleast would apreciate the move forward.
      I have a HDTV and most the peope I know now have one also, they have gotten allot cheaper and things like this will only help sales.
      So you keep playing your games on the XBOX in NTSC then, or dont and play PC games because they are better.
      I still say this is a big deal.

    17. Re:Hmm. by Comen · · Score: 1

      Madden is actully in both 720p and 1080i and looks it!
      Its pretty awsome.
      BTW I think 720p looks better than 1080i my self.
      But my TV will only do 1080i and not 720p, but the LCD TVs I have seen play the game in 720p looks better I think. The progresive display looks more liek the PC monitor I am used to.

    18. Re:Hmm. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      I said _I_ didn't care about a box that the entire reason the box "matters" is HDTV. I said a console whose sole selling point requires an HDTV is not as "big" a deal as you make it out to be. The people buying into the console are going to be disappointed if an HDTV is required to view what's so "special" about it... You know when the great unwashed get their shiny 360 home and plug it into their analog NTSC TV, they will be disappointed if the sole selling point is HDTV.

      I'm not going to buy a console which requires a $2000 accessory. When did I say I owned an XBox? Nice assumption. You have an HDTV, and everyone you know has one. Good for you. Have fun with all that. I'm sure you're very proud of it. They have gotten cheaper over the years, but not THAT cheap. I paid $99 for my last TV 3 years ago. It still works fine, and HDTV "content" is not a priority in everyone's life, in spite of your contention.

      But again, thanks for still saying YOU think its still a big deal. When I spoke about the 360, I was giving my opinion. I was not speaking for others. You however seem to think that you speak for the planet when you say it is a big deal. ...and thanks for missing my point.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  21. Played It by NetFusion · · Score: 5, Informative

    A friend waited in the hype cue at a Wallmart for 8 hours and picked one up last night. Apparently they had 32 to sell and and a line of 50 people. At 10mins before midnight a guy shows up walking the line waving 300 bucks for someones spot in line. Needless to say someone thought having his xbox mostly paid for a little later, rather then tonight, was worth giving up his spot.

    But thankfuly not my pixel junkie mate and I got to play it. Overall it seems really solid but out of the 4 games he got, nothing grabbed me. His long wait for a native title that can push this new system to its limit has begun.

    1. Re:Played It by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      32 consoles for a Wal-Mart? That sounds like a number small enough to deliberately generate "sold out on 1st day" headlines.

      I can't help but think that anyone thinking they are going to make a killing selling their 360s after the 1st few weeks is going to be disappointed.

    2. Re:Played It by Khith · · Score: 1

      My Wal-Mart only got 18, and they were all apparently pre-ordered. We had people camping out in electronics. Campers, waiting for the 360 to spawn at midnight, I guess.

  22. Is it me? by Zediker · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or when they always say how much the games market does it always grow by about 5 billion each time? First it was 12-15 billion market, then 20 billtion 2 weeks later, now its suposedly 25 billion... I still think its around 12-15 billion due to exageration error...

    --
    I love to slaughter the english language.
  23. One of the funniest things! by j2asghar · · Score: 0

    My work this morning had an xbox 360 set up to demo the ppc in side. Being the only one that can play games i took a shot at madden 2006 for it. My only real complaint about the game, and i can't believe i'm about to say this, was MADDAN WASN'T IN IT?!?! I didnt hear any of his annoying sayings, which one would think was a good thing, but alas i'm used to it so i felt naked!

  24. WTF? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 0, Troll

    MS came out with a new game system? How come there wasn't any media coverage of this? I'd expect there to be at least some story about on Slashdot even if the mainstream media dropped the ball.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  25. It appears the Microsoft plan is working... by bobcat7677 · · Score: 1

    I heard on the radio this morning about how the retailers are already selling out of 360s. Of course all that is by design as we saw previously: http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/03/ 0026241&tid=211. Never mind that it's all social engineering...go buy yours now before they are all gone!!!

    1. Re:It appears the Microsoft plan is working... by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's social engineering, it's working well for MS, dont'cha think? Should increase the buzz and gain MS some marketshare (until the PS3 comes out).

      My 360 shipped Friday (the Coscto bundle) and is due to arrive on the 28th (shipping from infamous Ontario, CA). Looking forward to using it as a MCE extender and Christmas gift for the kids.

    2. Re:It appears the Microsoft plan is working... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Check out this post: http://games.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=169069&c id=14092713 saying that a Wal Mart had 32 consoles.

  26. a media center by everphilski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft touts this as a brilliant center of home media and that's probably true for anyone who doesn't already have a home entertainment center of some sort.

    Yup. Its perfect for college students and the like who have to pick up and move every few semesters and share stuff with other people. Why stock up on a lot of equiptment when a XBOX will function as your multimedia center?

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:a media center by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 0, Troll
      Its perfect for college students and the like who have to pick up and move every few semesters and share stuff with other people.

      Yep, until it gets stolen.

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
    2. Re:a media center by prezkennedy.org · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, this is doubly true after some guy held up EB and ran off with two of them. Would you really leave $400 hardware out that could walk off?

      --
      It started back in Team Fortress Classic
  27. eBay by billybob · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lord a'mighty, have you seen how much these fuckers are going for on ebay? Check out the listings... one even sold for over 5,000 dollars (yes, five thousand).... Wow.

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:eBay by op12 · · Score: 1

      Sold to a guy with no feedback. Good luck collecting on that :)

      Then again, there probably is someone crazy enough to pay that much. I wish I had thought to wait in line to make a few grand on ebay.

    2. Re:eBay by Frazbin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the winning bid was made by a guy with 0 feedback. Irritating prankster, or covert Microsoft hype agent? You decide.

    3. Re:eBay by tonywong · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How do you know it's not 2 microsoft marketing employees kiting up the price of a unit to hype it?

      The cost of such an astroturfing operation is the eBay listing fees and that's it. Pretty cheap for a lot of buzz.

      Just a thought.

    4. Re:eBay by Surt · · Score: 1

      Must have been an incredibly dumb rich kid. It's hard for me to imagine how else you have enough spare money to pay $5k for an xbox, but don't see the numerous other options to get one cheaper.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh, from the $5000+ auction:
      Due to the unexpected low stock received, the item will ship within 2 weeks. Sorry
    6. Re:eBay by dema · · Score: 1

      Haha, from the short description for this one:

      Microsoft Xbox 360 - Game console NO RESERVE!!! L@@K!!!
      GET IT NOW SOLD OUT!!PERFECT FOR THE RICH SPOILED KID!

    7. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a good point, however it takes 2 people to drive the bid up that high. Take a look at the complete bid history. There are a lot of legitimate bidders who were willing to pay a ridiculous amount of money for that one.

    8. Re:eBay by marcop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am looking for someone selling an Xbox 360 box like sellers did with the original. In the frenzy of buying, buyers didn't realize that they were buying the packaging material only.

      Anyone find such an auction for the 360?

    9. Re:Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only thing is, it's Bill buying from Steve...

    10. Re:eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa, great idea. *goes to sell his box*

    11. Re:eBay by boredMDer · · Score: 1

      Ask and ye shall recieve.

  28. Out first=Clear Advantage? by Puhase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm still unclear about why the fact that 360 is out first is a definitive advantage. I guess they get a chance to take a first crack at the market, but...there seems to be some extremely dark clouds on the horizon due to this early arrival.
    1. No HD-DVD or Blu-Ray- whatever happens with this media format debacle, the people with the new 360 out now wont have it.
    2. Future Version Product Confusion/Backlash- Because of the above, when they begin to release future updated hardware versions of the 360, the market will be confused as to what they should purchase. Its not a new system, but it has new features this time around. Will there be expensive add-ons to accommodate current owners? Because those who have the old and not the new are gonna be pissed that they didn't get the finished system. This isn't the slim-downed PS2 I'm talking about here. That was a cosmetic change or downgrade option(imho), this will be a complete technical upgrade.
    3. Debut game lineup-What lineup? If I don't like sports or shooting Nazi's... not much left, maybe Kameo. Much of the "meat and potatoes" was delayed past X-mas, creating a weird kinda of late winter "secondary launch".
    4.All they are competing with is heresay and conjecture-The hard and fast realities of the PS3 and Revolution are still out in the open. So a decision by the consumer is hard to make, because no real comparison can be made. This will inevitably create a bubble of "undecided". Although with how rabid gamers can be, there will always be those too impatient to wait.

    I'm no fanboy, I own all three of the current generation and agree all have things about them I like. It just seems to me that we've got a situation here where the 4th grader has rushed to finish his test first and hand it in to the teacher so he can look back at the class and say "I'm done first". Even though he did a sloppy job, didn't fully answer each question and in the end didn't get a great grade.

    --
    I am and always will be a stereotype, because who in their right mind prefers mono?
    1. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by devilsadvoc8 · · Score: 0

      Where exactly is the sloppiness? You cite no flaws. From all accounts, the GUI is extremely well done and they fixed the controllers.

      No blu-ray? That's a bit picky. Who knows when that debate will end. If they put one in would you have critisized them for picking the wrong one or for choosing one over the other for nefarious purposes?

      The future version confusion is pure conjecture on your part.

      The lack of headliner games is debatable but is your strongest and most valid critisism IMO.

      So you suggest they should wait and see what the PS3 and revolution are doing before progressing. Microsoft is an aggressive company and will not be passive with this. They are going to try to capture market share that evaporate when the others come out. While it has risks you cannot logically find fault with this based on all of your other comments.

      --
      B O R I N G
    2. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I dont think MS are going to benefit from launching first. The Dreamcast had a similar advantage (in being first to market) and it didnt realy help it....it also lacked DVD capabilities (The BIGGEST mistake on Segas part IMO).

      For me, the lack of a good RPG (Oblivion), the fact that I already own a reasonably good (6800GT) PC and a media PC (6800 vanilla) but dont have a Hi-Def TV; all have conspired to leave me feeling rather unexcited regarding this launch. Although the 360s graphics are good I expect they will look rather last generation within 18 months (about when I'll next be upgrading my graphics card..8800 or 9800 I wonder?) and while I might be tempted by a PS3 since, although I dont like the DRM encumerance of Blue-ray having a player may be worthwhile and WILL be getting a revolution (I dont own a GC so will have access to a nice back catalogue of games I hant played before and that controller just looks FUN)....well the 360 just has nothing to tempt me. Nothing! The games, the media functionality (the DRM)....its all just so much of the same.

      The above said, while I wont be getting a 360 I can well see it being a huge success in the US (mabe even becoming the market leading console over there).

    3. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by f3r0c7ty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The advantages seem clear from a business perspective.

      1. Market Share - Releasing somewhere between 7 - 9 months before Sony will intially give MS a larger market share. Sony's PS3 will have to play catch up which I have no doubt it will do but at the cost of market share. Forcasts estimate MS shipping 6 - 8 million or more 360's to Market by the PS 3 launch date. Shipments of the 360 are expected to outpace the PS 3 until 2008.

      2. Cost - Using the market share above MS will have the ability to leverage it's cost advantage over the PS 3. http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_conte nt&task=view&id=1497&Itemid=2

      Your 4th grade analogy is only partially correct. Yes it is like a 4th grader rushing to turn in his test first but the difference is that this 4th grader may end up doubling his market share to 40% or 45% by doing so.

    4. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by Puhase · · Score: 1

      The sloppyness is in the release, not the console design. My comments were not from a technical perspective, but from a marketing one. The idea that the 360 has an advantage over its competitors because of an early release is a financial and marketing advantage, not a technical one, so I was criticizing that concept.
      I did not say this it had to have blu-ray. I said that it did not contain either blu-ray or HD-DVD and that that is a legitimate fault, when they have made press releases stating the inclusion of a next generation media reader in their new console. So I would not have criticized the inclusion of one or the other, just the lack of one althogether. It requires one of a few outcomes: a "Sega CD" type add-on reader at quite an expense, a new version with built in capability, or both. Any of these are less than enviable positions when your main competitor is coming into the market with only the built in from the very beginning. Any of these create a negative impact on the very market you are trying to win over.
      If they only offer a "built in" model, parents/sane human beings, will not buy an entirely new console just for this functionality. And if this new format becomes prolific, they will feel cheated of having access to that functionality. A "reader/player" add on would be quite expensive, as they are predicting the first generation to least be over $400. And what do you call a newer updated version? X-Box360 2? 361? 520?
      In my book, "aggressive" can easily translate to "without careful thought", and the oly advantage I see here is, those non-thinking first adopters will sign on. And yea, that TOTALLY worked for the Dreamcast.

      --
      I am and always will be a stereotype, because who in their right mind prefers mono?
    5. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I don't like sports or shooting Nazi's...

      What the hell is wrong with you, man?!

      --
      Fuck it
    6. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by egriebel · · Score: 1
      I'm no fanboy, I own all three of the current generation and agree all have things about them I like.
      Umm...wouldn't that be the definition of a fanboy?
      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    7. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by egriebel · · Score: 1
      For me, the lack of a good RPG (Oblivion), the fact that I already own a reasonably good (6800GT) PC and a media PC (6800 vanilla) but dont have a Hi-Def TV; all have conspired to leave me feeling rather unexcited regarding this launch....The games, the media functionality (the DRM)....its all just so much of the same.
      Ok, let me get this straight, you own $2-3k in PCs and yet you're not excited about a console? Shocker! With these two systems it shouldn't be a surprise that it all seems "just so much of the same".
      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
    8. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. No HD-DVD or Blu-Ray - I agree this is a flaw, but not an earth-shattering one. The number of HD-DVD/Blu-Ray titles are initially going to be extremely slim, due to the fact that HDTV (*still*) hasn't made much penetration in the marketplace. Maybe in 2-3 years it'll be another story -- but MS has already said they'd release a new HD DVD version of the console if there was demand.

      2. Future Version Product Confusion/Backlash - I don't see the problem here. This happens with every generation. Backward compatibility has always been a sore spot, and even the PS2 didn't fully support EVERY PS1 game out there.

      3. Debut game lineup-What lineup? - See, now, here's where you and I differ. I see a console built for 21-34 somethings with an 18-game launch. Those 18 games more or less cater to that demographic: shooters, sports and racing. The only thing really missing from the launch is platformers, and that usually only covered well by Nintendo's launches. Kameo looks to be a good game for the kids, and that's all I really need to justify the purchase for the family: one good game for them.

      4.All they are competing with is heresay and conjecture - This happens with EVERY launch with EVERY console. It's a part of the entertainment industry. From the beginning of the first medieval jester's appearance, likely announced with "this'll be the funniest thing you see ever", there's been hype. That "bubble of undecided" always exists, and it's always negated by market whims.

      In short, don't read too much into this. If you're a gamer you'll get all 3 regardless. I'm a gamer: I'm getting all 3.

    9. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      Perchance it's one of them elusive women?

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    10. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by melbafuckingtoast · · Score: 1

      I was that kid. I always shot for B's, and got them easily. Then I got to go home and read what I wanted to read and pursue what I wanted to pursue. School was deathly boring.

      It doesn't matter when a console comes out, things will always be better later, so what does it matter? It's just for playing games.

    11. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by thenefariousone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Say what? This is a disadvantage how?

      A game console should wait for potentially years for the Blu-Ray and HD-DVD problem to be resolved?

      Especially when both formats will have virtually no impact on games?

      The average current pc game that uses all the latest features and high resolution textures is only around 4-5 Gigs. The higher that goes, the more expensive games become to make.

      And if one dvd isn't enough, just ....revolutionary idea coming.... use two dvds.

      The PS3 having Blu-Ray has very little to do with games, but with Sony's overall consumer electronics plans.

      "1. No HD-DVD or Blu-Ray- whatever happens with this media format debacle, the people with the new 360 out now wont have it. "

      I don't see how microsoft swapping out the standard dvd drive for a Blu-Ray/HD-DVD drive a year from now would make any difference for games. All older games would work as before, but now you can also watch Blu-Ray/HD-DVD movies.

      Where's the confusion?

      The Debut linup is widely regarded as pretty good for a new console. Historically, console launches don't have a great long term impact.

      That you don't like sports, or "shooting Nazis" is at best anecdotal evidence. Console companies wouldn't stay in business very long by only catering any one person's specific tastes.

      Only one of the fps games available involves World War 2, and even that one has received pretty good ratings.

      "3. Debut game lineup-What lineup? If I don't like sports or shooting Nazi's... not much left, maybe Kameo. Much of the "meat and potatoes" was delayed past X-mas, creating a weird kinda of late winter "secondary launch". "

      Which is a clear cut advantage, once you realise that Speculation goes both ways.

      Option 1: Watch movies of what "the revolution/ps3 may play or look like." The price and release dates aren't set in stone, you know nothing more than it "will" be coming out eventually. Revolution controller "seems" like a new idea, but how will it work out in games?

      Will PS3 be able to make games from what they've shown, or is it again simply typical Sony hype ala "the PS2 with an Emotion Engine SUPER COMPUTER that's so powerful that the US government is baning them from being sent to Iraq to power nuclear weapon progams."

      Option 2: Buy the console that came out today, play games, and take advantage of the console's online advantages today.

      Or buy it later. When the other consoles come out, xbox 360 will be a better value for the money. From being out first it will have more and better games available and have a lower price due to a price cut.

      "4.All they are competing with is heresay and conjecture-The hard and fast realities of the PS3 and Revolution are still out in the open. So a decision by the consumer is hard to make, because no real comparison can be made. This will inevitably create a bubble of "undecided". Although with how rabid gamers can be, there will always be those too impatient to wait.

      I'm no fanboy, I own all three of the current generation and agree all have things about them I like. It just seems to me that we've got a situation here where the 4th grader has rushed to finish his test first and hand it in to the teacher so he can look back at the class and say "I'm done first". Even though he did a sloppy job, didn't fully answer each question and in the end didn't get a great grade."

      --
      http://hughgordon.com/
    12. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      1. No HD-DVD or Blu-Ray- whatever happens with this media format debacle, the people with the new 360 out now wont have it.

      That seems more and more to be a non-issue. It's not like there's an accepted standard for next-gen DVD anyway. Blue-Ray seems to have an edge, but it's not even production yet, Sony's BR copy-protection is getting so much criticism that the kind of people that the details of next-gen DVD matters to may not even want BR for that reason. Sony muddied the market a few days or so ago by talking about Red-Ray or some such derivative of Blue-Ray. HD-DVD has more lenient copy restrictions but no one is sure how close it is to production either, and it has less space than Blue-Ray. In short, the whole next-gen DVD technology and market is currently a mess, and no one is sure how it will work out. In the meantime, DVD is will be fine for most purposes, and if a game or movie needs more room, the publisher can use multiple DVD's. Yes, switching mid-game/movie is a bit annoying, but not the end of the world.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    13. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Sony muddied the market a few days or so ago by talking about Red-Ray or some such derivative of Blue-Ray.

      If I caught the same news you did, I got the impression that Red-Ray was Sony's end run around HD-DVD. They will basicly offer Blu-Ray format content on red laser, DVD discs. They will be cheaper than HD-DVD and with 9GB of VC-1 or MPEG4 content, have solid kick-ass quality. Looks like they're trying to squeeze them with the low-enders taking Red-Ray, the high-enders Blue-Ray, and noone HD-DVD. It's ambitious for sure, time will tell if it succeeds...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by midnightblaze · · Score: 1

      I got one of the very first PS2s out. And at the end, I kept getting those disc read errors. I tried the online howtos before I said fuck it and bought one of the new, slim-downed PS2s. Not a disc read error since. It wasn't merely a cosmetic change. They changed the CD holder from a tray to a spindle that works much better and eliminates the read errors.

    15. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by dbug78 · · Score: 1
      1. No HD-DVD or Blu-Ray - I agree this is a flaw, but not an earth-shattering one. The number of HD-DVD/Blu-Ray titles are initially going to be extremely slim, due to the fact that HDTV (*still*) hasn't made much penetration in the marketplace. Maybe in 2-3 years it'll be another story -- but MS has already said they'd release a new HD DVD version of the console if there was demand.
      No they didn't... nor should they.
    16. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by mcc · · Score: 1

      3. Debut game lineup-What lineup? - See, now, here's where you and I differ. I see a console built for 21-34 somethings with an 18-game launch. Those 18 games more or less cater to that demographic: shooters, sports and racing.

      That's the thing though, isn't it? This huge deal is being made about how the XBox 360 is a hook into a wider market, that this is going to be the thing that takes Microsoft from a toehold to a serious player in the console market. Yet nobody seems to be denying that the 360 is being targeted exclusively to one single demographic, that of the subset of 21-34 somethings who are able and willing to buy a console just to play shooters and sports games on.

      You can't get market power by catering to a single demographic. You can build up a strong niche position that way, and you can make a lot of money (just ask Nintendo) but you can't take over a market, not one as wide as the video game console market is. Yes, I'm sure there are some people to whom 19 xbox-style shooters and sports games is more than enough to make a console a must-buy. But this thread isn't about whether one should buy the XBox 360. It's about whether Microsoft has a "clear advantage" by coming out early, it's about whether Microsoft is going to get their stated goal of rivalling Sony. And this isn't getting them that.

      OK, so those 19 games'll make the specific kind of person that all 19 games are aimed at deleriously happy. But these people are the XBox's base. It's the XBox's core niche. These people would have bought the 360 whether it came out now or in a year. And if you aren't one of these people, the XBox 360 launch, if not the XBox 360, is pretty much leaving you out entirely. What advantage, if any, is left in this early launch?

    17. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who are "kinda sorta thinking" about buying a 360 arn't going to buy one at launch. Launch is for the base and people who are hyped into it.

    18. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by mcc · · Score: 1

      The people who are "kinda sorta thinking" about buying a 360 arn't going to buy one at launch. Launch is for the base and people who are hyped into it.

      This wasn't exactly the case with, say, the PS2 launch. I mean, yeah, the shortage meant that it was mostly the hardcore who wound up with them, but all kinds of people were buying them and interested in buying them. I think the PS3 launch may be quite similar to the PS2 market. The Playstations target a wider market, and they get a wider market interested at launch than the diehards that the XBox 360 panders to...

    19. Re:Out first=Clear Advantage? by SilentChris · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, that many sports games doesn't really pander to the hardcore market at all...

  29. The stages of profit by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Phase 1) Hype up next-gen console, convincing all those gamers that it really is worth having.
    Phase 2) Release next-gen console, intentionally undersupplying the retailers to ride that "sold out" hype wave.
    Phase 3) Profit.
    Phase 4) Release all the games on PC anyways.
    Phase 5) More profit.
    Phase 6) Suckers realize they wasted $400 on a console whose games are coming out on PC anyways.
    Phase 7) "Leak" (a.k.a. plant) information about the NEXT next-gen console onto the web.
    Phase 8) Return to Phase 1.

    --

    "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

    1. Re:The stages of profit by nissu · · Score: 1
      Phase 4) Release all the games on PC anyways.
      I don't play on PC (and never will) so couldn't care less.
      Phase 6) Suckers realize they wasted $400 on a console whose games are coming out on PC anyways.
      The real suckers waste $400 every year on upgrading their gaming PC.
    2. Re:The stages of profit by Mayhem178 · · Score: 1

      You're right, because anyone who knows what they're doing would have built it right in the first place. My last gaming PC lasted 4 years without an upgrade.

      Either way, I think you're both missing the point. I never said profit was bad. But of all the people interested in the Xbox 360 (more so, the people interested in getting one right this instant, while it's still super expensive), what percentage of them do you think already have a PC for gaming? Beyond that, how many of them do you think are going to turn around and also buy a PS3, and/or a Nintendo Revolution, and the games associated with them? I can't say anything for certain, of course...but I'm gonna wager those percentages are pretty high.

      If console gaming is your thing, by all means, go for it. I've had my share of fun in the glory days of consoles, and contributed to the retirement funds of everyone at Nintendo and Sega. But back in those days, PCs were no match for the capabilities of the consoles. Nowadays, the story is different, and in my mind PCs are much more cost-effective. Besides, it kinda irks me that consoles are trying to be more than just a gaming platform, which is probably what turned me off to them in the first place. Anymore it's like you buy a console for all its cool features...the games are just a bonus.

      --

      "You will pay for your lack of vision..." - Emperor Palpatine to Ray Charles

  30. Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by managedcode · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Disappointed lot of gamers. Release was very poorly managed with just 20 pieces for every store. Whether Microsoft made money or not, eBay and speculators are making money. The latest Winning bid: US $2,225.00

    1. Re:Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      You uhh know this release was worldwide right? 20 pieces for every store seems like alot now doesn't it?

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    2. Re:Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by Penty · · Score: 1

      Talking with the local EB store; apparently what happened is that everyone was given an initial allocation, then later Microsoft increased that. At the last minute some big retailer stated they needed more and Microsoft caved in. As a result thye short changed everyone else.

    3. Re:Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I think the shortage is
       
        a)intentional
        b)stupid
       
      Here's why it is stupid, all those people paying 1000+ on ebay probably would have paid 1000+ on the 360, and every single game/perhipial. Will some of them still do it? Sure, but $500 in markup that MS isn't getting can't help.
       
      Over the next few weeks I predict there will be many many more available. MS didn't go to all the trouble of releasing for christmas to go out and not sell many (not that they haven't sold a good many when you include preorders). On release they had 10-20 at Wal-marts and more at best buy--nation-wide their sales had to be TINY. All the advantages of pumping out a console before the PS3 are lost if they don't sell a LOT and get developers interested.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    4. Re:Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by Keeper · · Score: 1

      If they sold out on launch day at every store they released in, they've sold about 500k-750k units. I wouldn't exactly call that tiny.

    5. Re:Poorly Managed Release. Traders making money. by leabre · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft was smart they'd be auctioning a few off on Ebay at outrageous prices, too. Seems a more sure way to help recover costs.

      Thanks,
      Leabre

  31. Sony should lower the price of PS2 to $99 by Sundroid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    partly to offer some kind of counter offense against Microsoft's Xbox 360 blitz, partly to rehabilitate itself from the DRM rootkit mess.

    1. Re:Sony should lower the price of PS2 to $99 by Gurana · · Score: 1

      I agree that it would serve Sony in some way to lower prices to compete with the new xbox. Others with more knowledge about how this market actually works will be able to speak more to this point. But I don't think that the average consumer even knows what a rootkit is... I doubt the average consumer could even tell you what DRM is. That said, I don't think sony has to figure the rootkit backlash into their corporate strategy in terms of pricing of the ps2...

      One other thought about Sony lowering the prices of the ps2 to compete with xbox: after all the people that didn't already own ps2s get them this holiday season, are they going to want to shell out even more money for the ps3 when it comes to town? Perhaps if they lowered the price of the psp, disuade people from purchasing the 360 in the first place, they would still be more willing to purchase the ps3.

    2. Re:Sony should lower the price of PS2 to $99 by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that the current pricing of a PS2 is very competitive with the price of an XBox 360 considering what you get.

      A PS2 can play thousands of games that are for most people just as good as what is being released on the XBox. Note: most people (who don't have HDTVs anyway and who are wowed by PS2 games because, well, they don't have one yet).

      PS2s will sell well this Christmas, that's my opinion at least. PS2 games will sell well for at least the next year, although obviously the marketing money will be put into XBox360 and PS3 games.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Sony should lower the price of PS2 to $99 by ankura · · Score: 1

      Would you like fries with that?

  32. Jack Handy? by paranode · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is that you? Such insight...

    1. Re:Jack Handy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Some mods have no sense of humor...or they're just ignorant and mod things in such a fashion.

  33. My original XBox is fine by drdewm · · Score: 1

    My original XBox with mods is working perfectly so I think until they stop making the games for it I will be hanging on to it. The HD game play is slightly attractive but not enough to re-invest a boat load of cash and time into.

    1. Re:My original XBox is fine by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      How many people actually have a HD TV? I can tell you how many people I know - none. I'm sure that something like less than 1% of the population have one. I just don't see it as being a big selling point.

  34. Coat Tails Man! Coat Tails! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    If the hype is to be believed, getting an Xbox 360 this XMas may be a long shot. So what are Ma and Pop who don't really know a lot about gaming, going to do? Why they'll just pick up a regular Xbox of course for a lot less money. There undoubtedly will be some coat tails sales of the first Xbox, even more if they cut prices. But don't expect any marketing of this from Microsoft. PS 2 sales may benefit too, but since the kids will be all, Xbox this and Xbox that, the old Xbox stands a better shot of getting some more sales this way.

    1. Re:Coat Tails Man! Coat Tails! by timster · · Score: 0

      "Ma" and "Pop" are never going to buy an XBox. Besides the creepy green color and the carefully targeted marketing campaign, the machine itself is actually frightening. The XBox always has been and always will be the domain of self-styled "gamers" who have lost sight of the potential greatness of the art in a blinding whirlwind of sports, sim-breasts, and first-person-shooters. (I refer not to the 360, though, which has a different approach.)

      Ma and Pop will buy a PS2, but they should have bought a GameCube.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    2. Re:Coat Tails Man! Coat Tails! by eshefer · · Score: 1

      I think that when saying xbox and ps2 what you actually ment was.. ipod.

  35. sony audio cd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    if you play a sony audio cd in it.. does it install it's rootkit?

    what a tough decision..

    we hate MS because their evil..
    we now hate sony because their evil..

    nintendo games suck because they're not evil..

    what's a geek to do.

    1. Re:sony audio cd? by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      "what's a geek to do."

      Kill yourself.

    2. Re:sony audio cd? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      nintendo games suck because they're not evil.

      Actually, Nintendo make awesome games. Unfortunately, hardly anyone else makes games for Nintendo consoles at all.

      However, back in the NES and SNES era, when Nintendo were the biggest thing in the industry, they were incredibly evil. Evil in a way that would have Bill Gates hiding in the largest church he could find. Spectacularly and monumentally evil. Google 'nintendo lawsuit' and see a history of litigation that would shock the Nazgul themselves. Or read this - they weren't nice at all.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    3. Re:sony audio cd? by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      what's a geek to do.

      Wait for the Phantom of course! :)
    4. Re:sony audio cd? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      You are ready, my son.

      Come over to Apple.

      Games will not bother you there.

      Join me on the different side.

    5. Re:sony audio cd? by dkf · · Score: 1
      what's a geek to do.
      Stop gaming and write code for fun instead. After all, the toys you make yourself are always much more fun than the prepackaged ones from the shop.
      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:sony audio cd? by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      Actually, Nintendo make awesome games. Unfortunately, hardly anyone else makes games for Nintendo consoles at all.

      This is pretty much what caused Sega to get out of the console market. Sega has always made good games (just like Nintendo), but they just couldn't get the number of good developers to release their games on their systems. EA's refusal to develop for the Dreamcast hurt as well...As did the fact that Dreamcast games could be copied and run on unmodded systems...

      Maybe Nintendo will do the same thing Sega did and drop their console hardware division at some point...I don't personally think they will, but it might happen. I also don't think they will get rid of their portable division because they are still at the top in that category (PSP is gaining ground, but nowhere near the installed base of Nintendo's portables)...

      Maybe the more obvious thing is that while Sony and Microsoft seem to be going in the direction of "more features", maybe Nintendo will simply make their systems smaller...to the point of their consoles being "portable"...this may be the next step for Nintendo...

    7. Re:sony audio cd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's a geek to do?

      Learn grammar?

  36. just say NO to Sony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is that the answer, then? don't buy a PS3 if you want to send a clear signal to Sony that their recent actions will not be tolerated.

    or do you not really care when faced with the prospect of not having your precious game console?

    1. Re:just say NO to Sony? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      You realize that Sony Computer Entertainment is completely different from Sony Music. Yes they share the Sony name but that's about it.

    2. Re:just say NO to Sony? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      And thereby say yes to Microsoft that their actions are? Wheee! That makes sense. Tomorrow, maybe we'll blow SCO.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  37. I hope this drive Linux dev for PPC by rindeee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My sincere hope in that the console makers are moving to PowerPC arch is that this will increase the pace of Linux dev for 64bit PPC architectures. There has been a lot of good work done, but the pace has been a little slow. I'm not much of a gamer, but this is one of the many benefits that gaming brings to other markets.

    1. Re:I hope this drive Linux dev for PPC by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean improve it more than Apple giving Linus a dual G5 did?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  38. My problem with gaming... by jferris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...still holds true for the Xbox360. I am not a graphics whore, so Microsoft isn't offerring anything of interest to me. I own a DVD player, I already have a computer, and I don't plan on getting HDTV to have prettier games. At least Nintendo is attempting to innovate. And if their innovation doesn't pan out, they have a fallback plan - in that there will be an "accessory" for the Revolution that will allow you to use the new controller in some sort of an "old fashioned" controller shell. As for the PS3, it is going to be awfully powerful - and that is really all I know for sure about it. The problem here is not me, as a gamer, saying "Make me a prettier game!". It has come down to me saying "Make me a game that will take longer than a weekend to beat. And don't do it by requiring me to power up characters for no other purpose than to burn time or placing impassible FMV sequences in the fifteen minute or more range (are you listening Square Enix?)."

    --
    You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
    1. Re:My problem with gaming... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not a graphics whore

      Therefore we aren't their target demographic.
      Pretty screenshots sell more games than actual gameplay does. Sad, but true.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:My problem with gaming... by jferris · · Score: 1
      Exactly. I can't blame Microsoft, though. I look at a larger part of the picture as being that people want games that they can pick up and not have to spend a lot of time with. Deeply epic games might be considered risky, because of the "investment" required in playing them.

      Personally, I set aside time on the weekend or a day off to get a sizable chunk of gaming in, as opposed to picking up for an hour a day, or whatever the norm is. The problem is that I don't want to play this year's version of a rehashed sports game that will be outdated in a few months, and I don't want to walk around splattering peoples brains with no concept of a story. Just another demographic that I don't fit, I guess. ;-)

      --
      You are in a maze of little twisting passages, all different.
    3. Re:My problem with gaming... by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

      Well the xbox 360 is actually the best one for solving the problem with gaming, and graphics have nothing to do with it.

      The problem is gaming is not the graphics or the controller, but the games themselves. For the most part, the games currently are very similar to each other and very expensive to create.

      You aren't going to see a lot of innovation when games cost so much to produce and distribute.

      But at least with the Xbox live Arcade, smaller developers are able to create all kind of new gaming experiences and get them out to a large audience.

      Xbox Live provides an opportunity for indie developers to succeed, take risks, and innovate. Something the bigger guys rarely do.

      Just like in the movie industry.

      --
      http://hughgordon.com/
    4. Re:My problem with gaming... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      So you exclusively play games that require a time investment, rather than those you can pick up and play for ten minutes.

      That's fine, but don't do the implication bash of a game genre just because you don't care for it.

      BTW, check out Indigo Prophecy. Awesome game and it sounds right up yer alley.

    5. Re:My problem with gaming... by tepples · · Score: 1

      It has come down to me saying "Make me a game that will take longer than a weekend to beat."

      Have you beaten Tetris yet?

  39. Why they continue to exist by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    So, question (seriously): Why do these things still exist? You've got a CPU, moderate-sized memory, HD, DVD-ROM, and input-device. Basically, it's a computer, with the user-mangleable parts missing.

    They continue to exist because they form an extremely hurdle-free platform to develop games for. Since they are proprietary (i.e. to keep weasels like me from buying them to put Linux on as a cheep piece of hardware) they lock in a % of game sales, which is where the real money comes from. What Microsoft wants is for you to buy into their world in some way, like every household in the world will have one of their boxes which suddenly lets them dictate standards for media delivery.

    All Sony and Nintendo want is to make money. Microsoft wants to control your options, like perhaps a benevolent dictator. Benevolent until you decide you can do without them.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  40. Smashed already by tuxnduke · · Score: 1

    One got smashed right after the launch just like promised: smashmyxbox.com... Few low-res images available now, some video footage promised 23rd and longer videoclip 26th this month..

    1. Re:Smashed already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing new under the sun...

      I broke PSP

  41. Re:Edge? New edge! by Luban+Doyle · · Score: 1

    Technological superiority may or may not be included in this product. It's real advantage is that it comes with artificial shortages built into the distribution process in order to create more consumer anxiety and higher levels of desire to acquire one.

    This is M$ ; marketing is their forte, everything else is just a product feature that can be marketed. What I'm waiting for is the first virus, trojan or rootkit for this platform.

  42. I tried getting one! by andrelix · · Score: 1

    I did my best to knock over old and feable people at Costco almost an hour ago to no avail! Damnit, no 360's today there. But what I did see, in little old Medford, Oregon is a strong demand and I am sure this is the case all over the country. I hear people complaining because Microsoft built it, but what I have heard from most people that have actually played it, it is great. Even Dvorak said it was quite nice. I know I want one and will get one after the New Year. I also have to admit that if I did get one today, it would be really challenging NOT to put it on eBay, I am shameless :(

    1. Re:I tried getting one! by Kazsmir · · Score: 1

      At my local Costco here in Virginia Beach, VA, they had a pallet worth (didn't get an exact count but I'm guessing around 25-50). The guy rolling the pallet away to the back though commented "There was a line like we were selling Rolling Stones' tickets or something!". Go figure... Didn't get a chance to see the price or what it came with (Costco normally never sells "just" the console, its always a package, with a game, extra controller, etc...).

    2. Re:I tried getting one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did my best to knock over old and feable people at Costco almost an hour ago to no avail!
      ...

      In the US, only old people line up to get an Xbox360.

  43. fake shortage may backfire by asv108 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From all accounts, it appears that Microsoft is trying to create an artificial shortage by only allowing a small number of units to be sold today. I called a few retailers this morning, all of them are sold out. Most of them had less that 40 systems for sale, and this in the Philadelphia area, not some rural market.

    While the intended effect is to create a buzz that encourages a christmas buying frenzy, it could backfire just as well. The original Xbox launch had an enormous supply. I wasn't really looking to buy an xbox at the time, but I happened to be in Best Buy 2 days after the launch, so I decided to give it a shot.

    Today, Xbox 360's are selling for nearly $2,000 on ebay. Not even a package, just the system. The "shortage buzz" will certainly keep casual purchasers away and I'm sure quite a few people might decide to wait a few months for the ps3.

    1. Re:fake shortage may backfire by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Did you miss all of those other articles about this on slashdot? This release is WORLDWIDE, everyone is pretty much getting it around the same time. This is not how it was with the original xbox. Microsoft announced a LOOOONG time ago there would be a shortage of xbox 360's. Ya, right, intended effect to create a buz... wtf does that mean? Why wouldn't they put out as many xbox 360's as they could? Does this make any sense to you?

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
    2. Re:fake shortage may backfire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ever hear the tale of the thousands of E.T. games for the Atari that were dumped in a landfill in the desert because the company over-estimated demand?

      Now take that and assume you lose money even when the console is purchased.

      Understand?

      Flooding the market is costlier than not.

    3. Re:fake shortage may backfire by archen · · Score: 1

      I'd say this shortage is anything but artificial. It's been known that they were going to have this problem beforehand. NOT because of some orchistrated plot against anyone, mainly because of a simultanious launch in 3 continents coupled with a launch schedule that was moved up way too far for manufactoring output.

      MS is attempting to create a gaming frenzy for Christmas and make these top priority for kids. That all sounds great until you realize that they can't pump these out fast enough. It'll be a hot item until January, when those who didn't get one are out of luck, and the propeganda for the PS3 and Revolution will start to seep in. Also keep in mind that January - March is typically the worst buying season. So they have the period of hot demand but can't pump them out fast enough, then may have enough by the time the purchasing season has leveled off.

      This thing might carry its weight if the games were superb, but it just looks like these are Xbox games with better graphics - that's not going to be enough to carry the console considering it's compeditors will soon be on par with it. The best hope for the Xbox360 are going to be the post-launch titles, again after Christmas the gaming market is also typically at a lull.

    4. Re:fake shortage may backfire by javaxman · · Score: 1
      Ya, right, intended effect to create a buz... wtf does that mean? Why wouldn't they put out as many xbox 360's as they could? Does this make any sense to you?

      Fake shortages happen *all the time*, and in this case, one has been predicted, and makes sense to a *lot* of people. It's fully orchestrated.

      I'd give you more links, but I trust you can google "Xbox 360 sell out" and related phrases yourself. Microsoft has themselves stated that they'll have a small initial supply and release *small* shipments. They could have started with a large supply, and could rapidly ramp up production ( as long as they have enough parts, I suppose ), but they've purposely choosen not to follow that route.

      Frankly, it's *exactly* what Sony did for the PS2 launch, and Microsoft has taken that winning play from Sony's playbook.

      Stuff like this happens all the time, particularly in manufacturing of high-end items, and this is just one more example.

      I don't know, maybe it didn't work... has there been an buzz about the Xbox360 today? ;-)

    5. Re:fake shortage may backfire by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      Today, Xbox 360's are selling for nearly $2,000 on ebay. Not even a package, just the system.

      I think you'll discover that many of the Xbox 360's on eBay are not even the system.

      Many are just scammers who plan on obtaining the machine (to ship out) sometime next week after the auctions are over. Probably just as well. With all the 0-feedback people winning these ridiculous bids, it is just vapor bids winning vapor consoles.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
  44. Not Trolling, just bitter by saskboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where are all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games? Do they have no other forms of entertainment that they must buy a bleeding edge Microsoft game console? Might I remind them politely that they can get a computer for the same price, and it can do games and everything else the XBox 360 can do, and not be locked into Microsoft only Xbox 360 games and software?

    Why not buy an XBox original and get oodles of games for it if you don't already have a system. You get way more entertainment bang for your buck. I guess keeping up with the Joneses is more important these days than it's ever been in the past?

    The media coverage this thing is geting makes me nearly sick. It's on the radio, the TV, and in print. I've only heard one reviewer say they wouldn't buy their kids the system because it's going to be at least $150 less in 6 months. Don't these parents realize that their heating bills are going to be about 50% more this year?

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by Felonious+Ham · · Score: 1
      Where are all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games?

      It may be that the two games that are available are intriguing enough to last until more titles make it into production. It took me a lot longer to get through Halo than what it said on the box, and I'm still playing it now.

      Can't argue with your comment about the hype, though. A Time magazine cover? I didn't think you could buy that kind of recognition.

    2. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by vertinox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where are all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games?

      You know that guy Dvorak... You know about his praise of the menus... Well... Lets just say they are really good menus.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games?

      [snorts milk out of nose] Uh-huh... yah, there are no games for the Xbox 360.

      What drugs are you on? There are 18 launch titles, 7 of which are currently getting reviews greater than 80%. And that's not counting the games on Xbox Live Arcade.

    4. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games?

      I'm one, I live in the US and am going to get a 360 as soon as I can. I make about 70,000 a year living in an inexpensive state (WI). After bills and saving, I have close to 1000 per month to do with as I please. Any that is not used goes into mutual funds.


      Do they have no other forms of entertainment that they must buy a bleeding edge Microsoft game console?


      My other forms of entertainment range from concerts, musicals, playing hockey, tennis, working out, spending time with my girlfriend, piano, guitar, and mathematics.


        Might I remind them politely that they can get a computer for the same price, and it can do games and everything else the XBox 360 can do, and not be locked into Microsoft only Xbox 360 games and software?


      Thanks, last month I got a $3000 (US) computer which I do enjoy playing games on. It runs Media Center which I plan on interfacing with the 360 when I get around to it.


      Why not buy an XBox original and get oodles of games for it if you don't already have a system. You get way more entertainment bang for your buck.


      My roomate already has his original Xbox in the living room, and we also have the PS2, Gamecube, and N64. Plus, there weren't even that many great games for the original Xbox.


      I guess keeping up with the Joneses is more important these days than it's ever been in the past?


      I don't know about that. I don't really care what my neighbors (who are all college students) have or don't have. To me, it's about me buying something I will have fun with and get use out of. Cars aren't important to me, so I drive a very average car, even though I could afford better. I like gaming, music, sports, that's where I spend my income that I can afford to.


      The media coverage this thing is geting makes me nearly sick. It's on the radio, the TV, and in print.


      Agreed.


        I've only heard one reviewer say they wouldn't buy their kids the system because it's going to be at least $150 less in 6 months. Don't these parents realize that their heating bills are going to be about 50% more this year?


      I can't speak for anyone else, but heat is included in my rent. And personally, if it wasn't, I would budget for it and then decide if I could still afford the toys I wanted. The truth is, for affluent people (the kind who this stuff is marketed towards), most of them are not going to have any problem paying $400 dollars for a new video game system. These are people who probably aren't living paycheck to paycheck, and who make $400 a day from their jobs or through gains in stocks, etc. Others not as well off can pay for it by saving up if they really want to. But I think you grossly underestimate the amount of people who *can* afford to buy things like this without planning their paychecks around it. Last weekend, I think I spent close to $200 going out with my girlfriend to dinner and drinks afterwards! You may be young, but work hard, and someday you'll reap the rewards. I am in no way saying life is all about the crap you buy, it doesn't really matter. I'm just answering your question about who it is who can afford to go buy these things. The upper-middle class and above, that's who. There's a lot more of them than there are Xbox 360s, that's for sure! The upshot: don't draw conclusions about the whole world based on your neighborhood, friends, and personal situation.

    5. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by saskboy · · Score: 1

      I heard on the [unpaid ad] radio that the "core" doesn't come with a game, and only has one controller. The Core costs about $500. That's what I meant by paying that much for no games. It literally has no games that come with it! It probably doesn't even play Nibbles! How lame is that?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    6. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by toopc · · Score: 1
      Can't argue with your comment about the hype, though. A Time magazine cover? I didn't think you could buy that kind of recognition.

      Damn Microsoft and their evil marketing hype machine!!

      Then

      Again

      I could

      Be wrong...

    7. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "don't draw conclusions about the whole world based on your neighborhood"

      The whole world is my neighbourhood though, as it is your's. The mistaken belief that it is not is the reason things like Sept. 11 was so shocking to people here. Things we do in North America are felt all around the world, and if we act like affluent ignorami, then we're going to have the rest of the world rather pissed off at us. There's nothing wrong with success, unless you rub other peoples noses in it, then it's about one-upmanship, not success for success's sake.

      It's because we live in a bubble here. I know you couldn't say to the face of a starving Myanmar child that it's reasonable to have 4 video game systems because you have $1000/month disposable income; you have a heart. But because our bubble [that is sometimes breached by scary events like Sept. 11, Katrina] makes sure we don't have to face the harsh reality of the rest of the world, we can sit in front of our $1000 entertainment center with a clear mind and soul. I like my digital camera as much as the next guy, but I'm not fooling myself. I know I'd have to give it up if the rest of the world, the 3rd World, ever had the ability to go to war with my country and possibly win.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    8. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, you trolling little twat.

    9. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry to be the one to break it down for you, but some guys are wealthier than you (we) are...

    10. Re:Not Trolling, just bitter by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why not buy an XBox original and get oodles of games for it if you don't already have a system.

      For one thing, pretty soon, Microsoft is going to EOL the Xbox, and no new official games will be developed for the Xbox. Ever. If you don't believe me, then what new PS1 titles came out this year?

  45. Re:I admit it by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. "Microsoft sooo does not belong in the game console market. They make Office software, for Christ's sake."

    Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System. They also make media apps. Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us.

    2. "The first X-Box was just a PC in a box."

    Ata fraction of the cost. Tons of people won't spend $1k to buy a new computer, but $300 for a console is fine.

    3. "The name is stupid and personifies what I hate about this machine and its community"

    What does this have to do with anything? Is the Dreamcast, or the Revolution, any better? Who cares what it's called.

    4. "The game library will mostly just be PC ports and Playstation ports"

    See above comment re: PC-in-a-box. Also, as a social activity, gaming on a PC with a few friends just sucks. Much easier to sit on the couch.

    5. "At least with the Playstation 3, it has the appeal of being the absolute top hardware"

    Hah. It's not so different from the 360. By the time the PS3 launches, it won't be near the top, compared to first-class gaming rigs.

    6. "Instead of letting the product sell itself based on its own value, as other companies do (a cliched example, but see Apple and its iPod...all Steve Jobs had to do was hold up an iPod nano to the camera, and everyone was SOLD on it)"

    You really crack me up. Apple spent millions and millions to market the iPod brand.
    "this thing is just a shareholder-driven profit grab"

    Now, a profit grab would imply that MS is making a profit on these. They are building a long-term business with the 360, not grabbing profits.
    "not a genuinely fantastic product from a company that actually makes games and game consoles and belongs in that market

    I won't claim to know if the 360 is fantastic or not, but like it or not: MS makes game consoles and they also make games. By your rationale, shouldn't Sony stick with audio equipment, and get the hell out of the game console market?

    It's obvious you hate MS. That's fine. By why are you upset that they released a product YOU DON'T HAVE TO BUY? Or are you just upset that it gets press?

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  46. Re:I admit it by paranode · · Score: 1

    1) Well that's your opinion but it sounds like you're just an Apple fanboy.
    2) Why were they duped? The fact that it used many parts exchangeable with PCs actually increased its popularity since it was easier to mod.
    3) It may seem stupid to you and me but the advertisers know what they're doing and they're probably right as far as the bottom line is concerned.
    4) Valid enough argument against any console, but then there was Halo.
    5) Perhaps, though it's too early to compare to the other consoles.
    6) Well companies do exist to make money. FWIW as a person who isn't much into gaming I haven't noticed any advertising on this and totally forgot it was coming out. Yet the droves of fanboys were lining up around stores across the country to get one. Seems like it has sold itself so far. I doubt things will be different with the other consoles.

  47. Re:I admit it by CommiePuddin · · Score: 1

    3.) The name is stupid and personifies what I hate about this machine and its community. Microsoft's marketing drones, in trying to decide how they'd market to drooling middle school gamers, thought "Well, gee, they'll see the '3' after Playstation 3 and think it's better than the '2' after X-Box 2. But we can't call it X-Box 3." Then they turn to their young, "dynamic" new guy they hired from an MTV marketing firm. "What would sound hardcore and hip to the kiddies?" "I've got it! It's better than 3, because it's 360!!!" And thus, a stupid market-drone name, X-Box 360, was born.

    I agree. "Super Nintento Entertainment System" was far more imaginative and descriptive.

    --
    x = x + ++x; //It's golden.
  48. Any Good Games? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Enlighten me here. Why should I buy a 360? Is there a single "Must Have" game for the console? Someone explain to me why I shouldn't just wait 6 months for a bigger selection of games and a lower price.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Any Good Games? by slowburn69 · · Score: 1

      to do that would mean you are reasonable... we wouldn't want to be reasonable in the face of a new game console, now would we? please, swallow your meds.

    2. Re:Any Good Games? by Voltageaav · · Score: 1

      I have the money, an HD TV, and love the first Xbox, but there aren't any games out for the 360 I really want yet so I'm waiting untill the first bomb game comes out. The Box itself should be cheaper by then too.

      --
      Someone save me from this sanity.
  49. Look at the calendar by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's November 22. They have to move several MILLION of these in the next 30 days before sales fall off. Retailers who can't sell it out won't carry it. So of course it's hyped to the max. It's the best console ever, it's the greatest gadget in the world, it will make you taller, it will get you laid, it comes in 3 flavors, etc....

    1. Re:Look at the calendar by pl1ght · · Score: 0

      You are dumb. Plain and simple. I want a PS3 more than i want a 360, but by NO means are retailers going to drop it. Its going to be more successful than the xbox(which was successful in its own right). You are just a MS hater trying to start shit

  50. Playa Hatin' by hotgigs · · Score: 0, Troll

    I got my 360 on saturday (every10minutes.com) and they've done some pretty slick things here... just like mod points and karma on Slashdot, Xbox live (the online play portion of the Xbox System) has a gamer score and you can compare your "achievements" with others. Yes, it's not productive in a "contributing to society" sense but how has your modding and posting on Slashdot changed the world? The thing that works great is this: Standardization. Everybody playing on the same system with the same specs and the same playing field from the start. If you are the better player, its because you are better. It's not that you downloaded some "hack". It will take a bigger role in the living room than most people will think. I have been able to download game demos (Has any game console allowed this to date?), trailers, and music to the Xbox. They may beat Sony by being first to launch but we all know it's about the experience and if people don't have a good time with it, they won't stick with it. May the best system win...

    --
    I'm not clever enough for a sig...
    1. Re:Playa Hatin' by khoury.brazil · · Score: 0

      I sincerely hope to god that you didn't utter the words, "Playa Hatin'" with any seriousness. Please let this post be a cruel joke on us all.

    2. Re:Playa Hatin' by hotgigs · · Score: 1

      Playa Hatin' was a joke... I couldn't possibly say that with any seriousness being a white male from the suburbs...

      --
      I'm not clever enough for a sig...
    3. Re:Playa Hatin' by khoury.brazil · · Score: 0

      whew. Close one.

  51. This is the first time I'm skippin a launch by wobedraggled · · Score: 1

    Since the NES. Nothing worth getting for the price and aggrivation. Revolution FTW!

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  52. What? by paranode · · Score: 1

    You haven't caught on that it was intentional?

  53. Re:I admit it by PoderOmega · · Score: 1

    1) Remember when Sony released the PS1? You could say the same thing about Sony. 2) So we got duped because it had PC parts in it? I don't think anyone got really upset by that. The price has always been reasonable. I didn't know consoles had to contain proprietary parts to be worthy. "Sega duped us with the Genesis because it had a 68k CPU!!!" 3) Yes, the 360 name is stupid. 4) I am against PC ports to the XBOX after the sequel to Deus Ex totally sucked because it was limited to XBOX hardware. But why are games Playstation ports? If a developer started the project with multiple platforms in mind, it's not really a port now is it? 5) Don't go by anything G4 says. When the PS2 came out it had worse graphics than Dreamcast. Wait until the developer have time to use the hardware. The games we are seeing now contains lots of new code. 6) Crap gets advertised all the time. Its called Business.

  54. buying love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Don't these parents realize that their heating bills are going to be about 50% more this year?>>>

    Parents have to buy their kids' love somehow! A few minutes of a joyful even grateful face instead of a pimply, pasty sneer. After the tens of thousands spent raising the kid, do you think the cost of a console adds up to much?

    1. Re:buying love by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "do you think the cost of a console adds up to much?"

      Yes, more than you can count too. You have to count the Bads witth the Goods. The Good lasts only hours when you first enjoy the system with the kid(s). After that it turns into one more thing to pry them away from to sit down to supper, or to kick them outside away from the TV. You could be hurting your child's healthy by buying them an addictive game system, and you'll certainly hurt their academics in some form, although to what degree is determined by the kid's willpower to do work to avoid having bad grades, and the parent's wisdom about when it's time to take the TV away so homework gets done.

      So the cost is $640C minimum for two kids to play, and poorer health and worse grades. Who WOULDN'T want one???!

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  55. Parent wins moron of the month award! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you are buying something for potential future features rather than buying it for what it is, you are a complete moron. If/when the addons that do what you want are released, then buy it.

    Buying something because it offers the most opportunity to spend money in the future is the most moronic thing I've heard all month.

    1. Re:Parent wins moron of the month award! by kionel · · Score: 1

      If you are buying something for potential future features rather than buying it for what it is, you are a complete moron. If/when the addons that do what you want are released, then buy it. Yes, because no one bought computers before there was any real software to run on it. Oh, wait...

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
  56. Reason why Microsoft will succeed. by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    In a Future Shop flyer (like Best Buy, owned by Best Buy) that came yesterday, a huge number of the HD TV , personal computer and home theatre ads from different manufacturers had the X-Box logo next to them and the caption "X-Box Connectable".

    This gives the regular home user the impression that the X-Box is THE game system and an integral part of any future home entertainment system purchase.

    These are the great unwashed masses (although some geek gamers are likewise unwashed) who will buy these systems in the greatest quantity. They aren't concerned about the minutae of pixel shaders, they just want a good system for themselves or the kids that's going to work with everything else they have. You haven't seen Sony or Nintendo tie their game consoles to the generic home entertainement system in such a big way. For them the console was the only thing and any old TV would do.

    With this rollout Microsoft gains a huge mindshare which wil work tremendously in their favour no matter what the number and quality of games immediately available.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  57. Why don't they make more of them? by Mo+B.+Dick · · Score: 0

    To me it just seems ridiculous to launch a product where there will be mass shortages. Why not just wait until December when you can ship more? It's sad that a consumer can't purchase a unit because half of the people in line are buying them to sell on ebay.

  58. Re:I admit it by MSFanBoi2 · · Score: 1

    1.) You don't have to like it, but it is the way of the future. I really cannot see a family gathered around a video iPod to watch movies on a 2" screen... Right now it IS looking good for Microsoft as the Xbox 360 does a lot more than previous gen consoles do, and it looks good.

    2.) The first Xbox was, the 2nd one isn't. Not even close to a PC. The point is, Microsoft didn't dube anyone into buying the Xbox, they brought plenty of content as well, and as the sales of Halo2 proved.

    3.) It's a NAME, hell RedHat and SUSE have done the same thing...

    4.) The Library may be ports, but most of them will be on the Xbox 360 first and then ported elsewhere. The point is its a HELL of a lot easier to develop for a console, especially the Xbox and Xbox 360 than it is for any other console let alone a PC.

    5.) All consoles are just more of the same. The Xbox 360 does bring a new suite of features over and above the PS2, Xbox and Nintendo Game Cube. Right now the Xbox 360 IS the absolute top hardware in the console market and will continue to be so for 6 to 8 months. Even then, the PS3 keeps getting stuff chopped out of it to make the delopment cycle and to keep costs down (even though its looking like the PS3 may be $500+).

    6.) Again, so what? Isnt' that what Sony is doing? Nintendo? RedHat? SUSE? Sun? Steve Jobs also spent nearly A BILLION dollars marketing the iPod and iTunes, don't even think of kidding yourself otherwise.

  59. Re:I admit it by jonnythan · · Score: 1

    2.) The first X-Box was just a PC in a box. Literally, opening it up revealed standard PC parts. That they duped an entire market into buying it astonishes and frustrates me.

    Duped the market?

    They produced a gaming console. It works. You put a game in and it plays. It was in every way visible to the user a standard gaming console. Who cares if the parts inside are Intel and IDE and so forth? They produced a good console with some good games, so people sold it. They didn't dupe anyone.

  60. Meanwhile, rewind to 1989/1990... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I admit it--I hate this console because it's from Nintendo. It's true. There are some other factors, but I'll sum it all up:

    1.) I hate that this is just Nintendo's lame attempt to further their platform into the living room. Nintendo sooo does not belong in the game console market. They make card games, for Christ's sake. Thank goodness Atari got their shit together and ran away with digital media via the 2600, or else Nintendo might have had a greater chance at conquering the living room. Right now, it's not looking too good for them.

    2.) The first NES was just a 6502 home computer in a box. Literally, opening it up revealed standard home computer parts. That they duped an entire market into buying it astonishes and frustrates me. The articles I've read have stated that the SNES is still very home computer-like (it has the same processor as the Apple IIgs) but at least it's smaller this time.

    3.) The name is stupid and personifies what I hate about this machine and its community. Nintendo's marketing drones, in trying to decide how they'd market to drooling middle school gamers, thought "Well, gee, they'll see the Super Nintendo and think of Superman!" And thus, a stupid market-drone name, Super Nintendo, was born.

    4.) The game library will mostly just be Sega ports. Another reason I wonder why anybody ever bothered with the original Atari.

    5.) It's more of the same. Same kind of controller as before, graphics that aren't as impressive as I was imagining "next-gen" to be. Even the shills on G4 were giving grades of "B" and "B-" to this thing. At least with the Sega Genesis, it has the appeal of being the absolute top hardware, and the Neo Geo will be absolutely top of the line. They have their markets to appeal to. Super Nintendo is in the middle here.

    6.) Again, it's Nintendo just trying desperately to further their platform. What annoys me is that they'll use all their billions of marketing dollars to blast this into everybody's faces as hard as they can, regardless of the console's actual quality. Instead of letting the product sell itself based on its own value, as other companies do (a cliched example, but see Apple and its Macintosh...all Steve Jobs had to have a Mac say "Hello" to the camera, and everyone was SOLD on it), this thing is just a shareholder-driven profit grab initiated by managers looking for new markets to "get a hold on," and not a genuinely fantastic product from a company that actually makes games and game consoles and belongs in that market.

    All laughs aside and I know some of these parallels are a stretch, but do you seriously think that Sony and Nintendo are a bunch of "artists" that are in it to create quality games and are not in it for the money? Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft are all large corporations eager to make a buck at all costs.

  61. Ebay by nathanmace · · Score: 1

    Has anyone on here checked Ebay prices for 360's? Wow. Upwards of two to three grand, each. God I wish I had preordered a handful to resell. Pretty nice profit margin....

    --
    I'm very responsible, when ever something goes wrong they always say I'm responsible.
  62. The value of Conversation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>> Yes, it's not productive in a "contributing to society" sense but how has your modding and posting on Slashdot changed the world? >>>

    It's called conversation: thinking, articulating, interacting. Yes, it's better for you than staring at a tv for hours wiggling your thumbs.

  63. Spent all night in line at a BB in Phoenix by caffeinatedOnline · · Score: 1

    Spent all night in line at a BB in Phoneix, only to find out that they only had 40-some units. Talk about an artificial shortage. I called every wally world in the greater metro area, only to be told that as of noon yesterday they were turning people away that weren't already in line. Hopefully MS keeps trickling in a supply, as there were alot of angry people who spent alot of time in line and got nothing. I paid $200 to some kid who got a ticket and was trying to sell it. Figure that it was worth not spending 40+ hours in line!

    --
    The sky above the port was the color of television, tuned to a dead channel...
  64. Check Out the Innovation! by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    1. Re:Check Out the Innovation! by mattACK · · Score: 1

      Years later I would still like a trackball in my game controllers.

      That being said what the hell does a 602 based Pippen have to do with the xbox 360?

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    2. Re:Check Out the Innovation! by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      I saw a lot of comments on this thread about the XBox being the first PC repackaged game box. It actually wasn't the first, hence the failed Apple Pippin reference. Now, personally I find the laf similarities between the Pippin and the Xbox amusing, and even more amusing is the PPC with the 360. From going to WWDC for 5 years, watching ATG technologies that Apple failed to produce but Microsoft push out, and failed Apple technology that other companies have done really well at... I'm just baffled by how badly Apple messed up so many opportunities in the 90s.

      Not that microsoft is any better, with their failed gaming (circa 80s), printing, hand held...

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  65. I got mine! But overpriced! by Aegis9975bb2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just got mine, haven't slept yet since getting it, actually.

    But I have to admit it probably isn't worth the price for everybody except the hardcore. It's waaaay pricer than what I payed for my original Xbox on launch day.

    I payed:
    $400 XB360 Premium bundle.
    $50 Extra controller
    $100 WiFi adapter for Xbox (my TV is not where my router is setup; had to buy it :( )
    $60 Madden
    $60 Quake 4

    In total I payed around $700 including tax. That's basically with 2 games and an extra controller. If tt wasn't for the WiFi it would have been closer to $600.

    Personally, I think I payed too much relative to the enjoyment factor. Quake4 is great but there is some MAJOR frame rate issues with that game, but my friend got PGR3 and it is absolutly beutiful, but the gameplay isn't my taste (personally prefer the Burnout-style gameplay to this "Kudos" system).

    While I'll say that I'm happy with my XB360, I wouldn't recommend buying one to anybody else until PS3 comes out and MS drops the price of the console. Also, there is no killer-app that's worth the price, and graphics aren't any better than what you would get from a well-equiped PC. But I know Halo 3 will be out for it someday, so it's good enough for me.

    1. Re:I got mine! But overpriced! by botzi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      >>But I have to admit it probably isn't worth the price for everybody except the hardcore

      No, you got it wrong. It isn't worth the price. Period.

      --
      1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
    2. Re:I got mine! But overpriced! by javaxman · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't recommend buying one to anybody else until PS3 comes out and MS drops the price of the console. Also, there is no killer-app that's worth the price, and graphics aren't any better than what you would get from a well-equiped PC.

      Dude. Thank you. Seriously. You've just justified every thought and every discussion I've ever had about why I'm not rushing out to buy one of these.

    3. Re:I got mine! But overpriced! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have to buy an official XBox Wifi thingie? Couldn't you just use any old ethernet wireless bridge?

  66. The Sega Advantage! by bugg · · Score: 1
    "Sony and Nintendo are planning to unleash their next gen consoles during 2006, giving Microsoft an edge over its rivals."

    Sounds like the advantage Sega always had.

    I don't think going first is an advantage in this game. Not with hardware prices still going down, and the ability to incorporate the innovation of the new consoles into the newer consoles.

    --
    -bugg
  67. I'll buy one by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

    At $300 bucks for an X-box 360 and $60 per game, I'm suddenly thinking of scooping up a used X-box. The attraction of consoles for me is the social aspect of gaming with others you can talk to/insult directly. I might not get the latest and greatest in technology, but I prefer that kind of game on the PC (mouse + WASD is my controller preference). I'm sure I can pick up an X-box for less than $100 (I think EB is selling them refurbished and warrantied for that much) and most of the games have dropped to $20-30 and been reviewed thoroughly so I know what games to buy.

    Of course if the 360 is backwards compatible with X-box games, that takes half the wind out of my sails.

    1. Re:I'll buy one by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Well, as far as backwards compatibility goes... it's a short list for now (since apparently, it's all on some sort of emu-basis... with each game having its own "compatibility" portion). As for the future, they didn't rule out adding more backwards compatibility available on Live! (Wow, a Windows update for your console... what fun.)

      I bet they'll do a few more via Live! and then stop bothering once the base gets accustomed to their stack of unplayable XBox 1 games. :) But, you never know...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  68. Huge lines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sold my spot in line to someone this morning at around 5am.
    Was waiting since around 12am, some kid comes up to the line, and says "I will pay $300 to one of the first 20 people in line for their spot". Believe it or not, but there wasnt anyone else in this line that was even interested in taking the money. Saved me the time of having to ebay it, plus I was able to get a couple hours of sleep. 8))

  69. "in it for the long haul" by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

    I think that's code language for "Xbox 360 is still heavily subsidized and it still isn't all that great, but maybe the next release will be better".

  70. HA HA HA by timeOday · · Score: 4, Funny
    Check out the "Ask seller a question" on that $5000 XBox:
    Q: Do you have the xbox360 listed here in hand ready to ship today the 22nd or tomorrow the 23rd?

    A: Due to the unexpected low stock received, the item will ship within 2 weeks. Sorry

    1. Re:HA HA HA by Sp00nMan · · Score: 1

      Yea and check out the person who won with a bid of $5100

      0 feedback, account created today.

      Are people just trying to screw over the people selling xboxs, or are they microsoft droids hoping to make the nightly news about "Incredible! XBOX360 sold for $5100 on eBay today! It's the new must-have item for Christmas!!!"

  71. The game lineup's always been that way, though. by jgrana · · Score: 1

    Think about it - the Xbox would be nothing without Halo and sports games. Half the folks I know who own one own it for Halo, and the other half just want to play Madden online. As it is, I think MS is shooting themselves in the foot by not having either of those ready for launch.

  72. Vancouver by Freedryk · · Score: 1

    Downtown Vancouver's Future Shop (Best Buy in Canada) has 2 core system left at 11:30. Seems like we're a little more hype-immune up here...

    1. Re:Vancouver by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Or, the hype machine telling people to drop an extra hundred bucks on the 360 package worked wonders. I lost count of the number of articles that came out recently basically telling people if they're not at HD yet they won't get their money's worth from the 360.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  73. The last time a company launched a year before.... by gotkube · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, lets see. The last company that launched a new console about a year ahead of everyone, was Sega with the Dreamcast... and where are they now again? :> 3 consoles in the market is just too many, especially when almost all games are published on all systems already... where's the advantage? I'll hold out for my $99 Revolution with new innovative games as opposed to the same old rehashed titles that have less substance than a bowl of cereal (assuming Nintendo doesn't simply create '256-Bit' versions of Mario, Zelda and Starfox with nothing more than better graphics. Not saying they won't, but I'm holding out for some *real* innovation).

  74. Lesser of many evils? by ppp · · Score: 1

    Hah! This is like choosing between the Nazis, North Korea and the Orcs. I'm going with the Orcs.

  75. Zero Hour by neafevoc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was at the Xbox Zero Hour release party last night (in Palmdale, CA). It wasn't that crowded at the event. I didn't have a problem playing every game on the show floor. I'm sorry to say that I'm not all that impressed with the release titles. (Yeah, I know first generation.) I also had a chance to buy one last night, but I didn't (however, hundreds of others did).

    I am impressed how well Live is integrated with the console. When we got there, they gave us a free memory unit and helped us transfer our Live account on it. Then we were able to play on Live wtih the number of games that were available. I think Live will dominate over whatever Sony has to offer as far as online integration with the console.

    Despite being not overly impressed with any of the titles, there was one that my buddy and I played for over an hour. It was from Live Arcade (a number of small titles you can download from Live). The game was called Geometry Wars. Yes, strangely enough, it wasn't the multi-million dollar developed games that won my game of the show, but this small independently developed game you can download from Live.

    I'll wait around like I did with the original Xbox before I get one. Same thing goes with the PS3. Comes back to what we said many a time: good games make good consoles.

    1. Re:Zero Hour by Saige · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I realized after a bit of play last night and this morning that Live is what's going to make or break the 360. The better graphics and more power is nice, but it's the amazing ton of features on Live that make it such a next-gen experience. Being able to voice chat with my friends while we play different games and even switch between them. Streaming my music from my PC to my 360 as a custom soundtrack in any game. Achievements and Gamer scores. Xbox Live Marketplace offering amazing games for $5.

      I feel about 10x more connected to people on my friends list than I did on the original Xbox. It's no longer this separate "play online" section - you're ALWAYS playing online in one way or another, with scoreboards or directly against opponents.

      I really think that anyone with a 360 and broadband needs to at LEAST make sure they're connected with a silver account, even if you don't want to pay the $50 to play online. It adds that much.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    2. Re:Zero Hour by tajgenie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think a big problem that many people (including me) have with Xbox Live is that you have to pay for it. On you computer you don't have to pay for anything but internet access to play online. The Xbox 360 (and the original xbox for that matter) are pretty much computers with limited feature OSes. Even on the original Xbox you could install linux, and have a fully functional computer. The Xbox live has nothing to do with lack of capability, Microsoft (and surely all companies would enjoy this approach, not just microsoft) just wants to make an extra profit off of this service. I know there are a lot of games on the Xbox that would have incredibly enjoyable split screen gameplay, but these games are Live Only. Xbox live is not cheap, nor is it expensive, but I would guess most people pay more for Live than for their games.

      How many of you pay to play a MMORPG? How many of you play diablo II still, or GuildWars because you don't want to pay every month? I know I would be playing WoW right now if it was free to play online. Yet obviously, the MMORPG servers are centralized, and usually can't afford to run without these payments. Does Xbox Live suffer this same problem?

      Take Half-life 2 for instance. On steam, all online games are free to play online (imagine the userbase that would be lost if Counter-Strike had a monthly fee). Can you honestly belive that there isn't a similar loss of players on certain console games because of this? This is all possible because people host thier own servers. All Xbox live is doing is taking away your power to host your own server, and charging you for it.

    3. Re:Zero Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I also had a chance to buy one last night, but I didn't"

      You moron. You could have made $1000 selling it on eBay.

    4. Re:Zero Hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geometry wars is created by the same studio that did Project Gotham Racing 3......

    5. Re:Zero Hour by nissu · · Score: 1
      Xbox live is not cheap, nor is it expensive, but I would guess most people pay more for Live than for their games.
      Live costs something like 5 USD/EUR a month which is pretty much nothing.
  76. The fruits of the monopoly by acomj · · Score: 1

    So far (acording to cbs marketwatch/wsj) MS has lost 4 billion dollars on trying to make a profitable console. No other company has so much money to throw into an unprofitable business. They don't plan to see any profit for 2 years..

    Thus some resentment.

    They're subsidising there console business with profits from there OS/and Business apps.

  77. This is why... by tomcres · · Score: 1

    ...I love TiVo. I haven't seen a single Xbox 360 ad yet! :-)

  78. Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is a major problem with this society today. I find it truly annoying that we don't celebrate more the success that many people do have. Instead we have many people who attempt to bring these people down.

    STOP IT.

    Damn it, we are a society of achievers. It is what drives this country. Yes it can be excessive but damn if we keep up this "loser" mentality then we truly will fall behind.

    It is the lack of celebrating the winners that is affecting our schools. We have systems which now "play games" with grades so as not to embarras those who don't strive to succeed. Schools go out of there way to minimize the success of a few and wonder why the students stop trying? If we want to know why our schools are falling behind in math and science we have only to look at why we stopped celebrating those who truly were outstanding. If you punish success you will get mediocrity.

    You ever think that many of the people buying these things don't have to care about their heating bills; which btw are not going to be that hideously different from last year. My price per therm hasn't budged, don't believe all the BS hype

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      We celebrate winners in our schools all the time. At least in sports. Fame, celebrity, and wealth seem to be all that counts in this society.

      Some of us consider the longer-term importance of putting money towards things that will build up the next generation, not just leave them in a mindless stupor.

      If you're successful, great. If you waste money, well, you're dumb.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "Yes it can be excessive but damn if we keep up this "loser" mentality then we truly will fall behind."

      You're not seeing the big picture. You're looking at it from a North American perspective, but we have to start seeing things globally. It just isn't ethical to spend $600 on a game console if you have an XBox, and Playstation, and Computer, and $600 would feed a family for a year in half of the world's nations. Sure success can be fun, and it's important to be successful, but you have to wonder at what point the nose rubbing that we do to the poorer half [90%, how's that for bad math] of the world, is going to come bite us on our butts, not our "complacency". Don't you think buying a 360 might make those people playing it more "complacent" about their success?

      Revolutions get started one 360 at a time.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1
      Damn it, we are a society of achievers. It is what drives this country. Yes it can be excessive but damn if we keep up this "loser" mentality then we truly will fall behind.

      {{{{{{{{{{HUG}}}}}}}}}}

      Preach on, brother!

      You're not Terry Goodkind by any chance, are you? ;-)

      If you punish success you will get mediocrity.

      And if you reward failure, you get Microsoft. :-) Hee hee. I crack me up!

    4. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Stalyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Congrats!! You get The Most Twisted Defense for Consumer Greed of the Day Award!! Please stop by Slashdot HQ for your prize, A NEW XBOX 360!!?!?!?!?! OMFGWTFBWBQNQEW

      I mean seriously how is forking over $400 for a toy some sort of success in your life? If you equate buying things with success you need a reality check. Currently us Americans are spending more than we earn. If we continue this trend we are going to be in trouble. They tell us to keep spending, it's good for the economy, etc. But it's bullshit. The economy is the same, we keep losing jobs, inflation is creeping and we have a huge national debt. In other news the House passed a bill cutting 50 billion in social services but in the same day passed 60 billion in tax cuts which mostly target the rich. WAKE UP!

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    5. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by ardor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its not ethical to spend your money? So everyone should spend all money thats not absolutely necessary to the 3rd world?
      Why do you have a computer then? Why do you have a house? Why don't you live in a small hut with 15 other people?

      This "we should spend the extra $$$ to the 3rd world" is nonsense. Fine, spend it! But be aware that the poor WILL NOT GET THE MONEY. Instead, your money will end in the pockets of the ultra-rich 1% in the 3rd world.

      You want to help? Push your country to open trade with the 3rd world countries. THIS is what everyone wants over there. The first world countries do not want this in order to protect their economy. Instead, they spend millions and finance the life of the upper class over there.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    6. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just isn't ethical to spend $600 on a game console

      HOW DARE YOU! You're posting on the internet! Obviously because 50% of the world's population doesn't have an internet connection - YOU SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED ONE!

      In fact, why do you have a house? Many people around the world live in slums and shanty-towns with a tin roof. HOW DARE YOU have a wood / brick / concrete home to yourself! You must immediately give your home (and all of your posessions) to a homeless family.

      And you have a car? WHAT THE FUCK? What are you, some kind of dick? I really don't care if you've worked hard to earn it - give me your stuff immediately!

      (And yes, I think that you're brutally retarded for complaining about what other people spend their money on.)

    7. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "Why do you have a computer then? Why do you have a house? Why don't you live in a small hut with 15 other people?"
      Because I live in the greatest country in the world, and its mighty military and allies protect me in North America's Bubble Economy. We live in a bubble. We can buy an XBox 360 while still owning the original, and have 2 SUVs, because we don't have to worry about being invaded by Bangledesh. I don't have to mend my own clothes, because we pay someone $1/month to make a new shirt instead, and ensure they can't make enough to come over here and teach their children C++, and buy them the XBox 360 before I can.

      "Push your country to open trade with the 3rd world countries."
      Better check the shirt on your back, I bet it says "Made in [Insert 3rd World Country here]". We've got trade with them, the problem is we take more than we give, and as you say if we gave more it would still only help the top 1% due to corrpution.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    8. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by ultramk · · Score: 1

      One measure of success (not the definitive measure, but a perfectly valid one) is when one earns enough money that one can buy what one wants, when one wants, without sweating it. Sure, there are people who spend more than they have. There are also people to whom $500 is a drop in the bucket. Who are YOU to judge what is excessive? I'm sorry if you have a lousy job, or have a mountain of debt, or have to support a wicked coke habit, but not everyone has your problems.

      I haven't bought a 360 yet, but I will sometime... and I'll be damned if I'll feel guilty about it because some twit on Slashdot doesn't think it's a valid expenditure.

      m-

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    9. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "(And yes, I think that you're brutally retarded for complaining about what other people spend their money on.)"

      That's OK, I think you're kinda cowardly for saying that to me without even logging in.

      I don't in fact have a car, I use a bike, although I'm thinking of buying a car for the winter. And people complain about what others spend money on all the time, its the whole point of politics after all. Don't cut taxes, cut taxes, don't cut programs, cut them, and I need a new war in Iraq too. It's all money and $600 on an Xbox 360 is $600 more going to Microsoft, and $600 less to something else. What's more important to you, a mostly redundant console, or what $600 can do for the less fortunate who work as hard as you do? Heck you don't even have to give to another country or the poor to make a difference, you could build part of a skate park in your 'hood, buy some cool trees and have fruit for you and your friends in a few years, buy your local library a huge CD collection, really your imagination is the limit.

      Don't mind me though, I'm just brooding about the inevitible downfall of western civilization in a pile of Xbox 360 kids, with not a park to play in.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    10. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to make you feel guilty or offend anyone. I'm just pointing out that buying a new xbox is what it is. The poster tried to paint it as some accomplishment that made you a "winner". Which is just ridiculous.

      Also my second point was actually that other people's excessive spending is going to become your problem. People need to recognize that through the economy and just the nature of society, we are all intertwined. If we keep spending and not saving and our government builds up this massive debt it is going to effect a lot of us. It is not the terrorists that is going to bring this nation down, but us Americans.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    11. Re:Bitterness over other's success or excesses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez, defensive much?

  79. MS already gains fans... by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    As Sony loses them.

    It's amazing how keeping your mouth shut and not coming up with ANYTHING inventive at all over the past 3 or 4 years actually benefits Microsoft this time around.

    Sony kept blabbing and then made their 'innovations' in DRM -- and screwed over a large portion of people. And gave themselves all the bad press they needed.

    Besides, the benefit to Microsoft is that they came out first. So when people start buying the next generation games... they will be on XBox. Playstation will have to catch up to their lead from coming out first.

    Who knows... I don't! I play games on the computer only. Xbox is for teh pansies :P

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  80. Competing with Google and Yahoo? Wha? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    Windows Live is designed to compete with similar online offerings from competitors such as Google and Yahoo.

    What similar online offerings by either of those two is this designed to compete with?

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  81. "Virtually Tied" by jasonditz · · Score: 1

    When did virtually tied begin to mean way, way behind? The video game industry as a whole (which is what we're talking about here by the dollar figures bandied about) has Nintendo far ahead of Microsoft, and indeed right in the same ballpark as Sony. Why does everyone conveniently forget about the 40% of the market called "handhelds" which Nintendo is nearly a monopoly in?

    Make no mistake about it: Microsoft is worldwide a distant third, and if we're counting things like pachinko machines and arcade games, they might struggle to compete with the like of Sega-Sammy for that. And they only got that far by subsidizing their hardware costs to the tune of billions of dollars.

  82. New and shiny! Must... aquire! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Overall it seems really solid but out of the 4 games he got, nothing grabbed me. His long wait for a native title that can push this new system to its limit has begun.

    I don't get these people.
    I wait for a few good games to come out, THEN I buy the console to play it.

    I don't buy a console and a bunch of rushed games just because they're new... I can't get the logic behind that at all.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:New and shiny! Must... aquire! by CFTM · · Score: 1

      It's not nearly as absurd as the people who are paying $1300 on ebay for an XBox 36 and the best I can tell it's not the package that comes with eight games it's just the bloody system. Were I my roommate [he ordered his from amazon, according to UPS his package should arrive today] I'd sell the unit, keep the games and then buy it for $400 after Christmas, but that's just me :)

  83. What does the rest of the planet think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The excess of US consumerism? People willing to pay thousands of dollars for a "luxury item" (if it's not food or shelter, it's "luxury item" in third world country.) And we wonder why the rest of the planet hates us? Spending more money than most of them make in a year... for a game console?

  84. Re:I admit it by gotkube · · Score: 0

    That was back in the day when gaming didn't need to adhere to the marketing standards of pop-culture in order to be successful. Damn you Sony!

  85. something to look forward to by tomcres · · Score: 1
    Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System. They also make media apps. Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us.

    I can't wait.. Microsoft Bob for Xbox 360... SWEEEET!!

  86. Not free by rinks · · Score: 1

    It's not free access. You pay for each title.

    --
    My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
    1. Re:Not free by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      It's their perogitive, and the way I see it, everyone wins. The games won't cost much; I'm guessing NES games will probably be $3 tops, $5 for SNES, $10 tops for N64. GameCube discs (and controllers, btw) will be compatable with the Revolution, so that will not be in their downloadable catalog.

      I think the idial solution would be to sell the NES titles really cheap, around $1-$2 like iTunes songs/videos, everyone will find the price so neglegable, they'll start downloading a ton. The comment about them rereleasing old NES games for $10 for the GBA is a little different, they have to make GBA games at least somewhat competative with their modern counterparts, and they usually countered this by updating the graphics or adding new features. These will be the original games, in their original form, for the original system, just emulated. There will be no cartridge to manufacture either, which they charge a bit for, alone. I'm also predicting that the basic system will come with a certain amount of "credits" to download a few old games, just to get people onboard. Question is, now that the GameBoy is becoming unsupported, will original GameBoy games be playable? I'm guessing that they'll put the functionality in there for them to be, but won't release any games until the GBA SP is discontinued.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    2. Re:Not free by 2008 · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never actually played a "NES Classics" series GBA game. They don't add new features* or update the graphics - in fact I heard that they still have the same slowdowns as the original, the emulator is a little too good. And they're £12-£15 in the UK. So deduct 33% for distribution and retailer's cut, maybe £2 for the box and the cartridge, and the game itself is still £6-£8. OK, so perhaps they're charging for portability and revolution downloads will cost less. And the less popular games might well cost less than the big names like Mario. But $1 for a NES game is so far off what they're charging on the GBA that it seems like a pipe dream.

      I hope I'm wrong, and they decide to go for volume instead of pricing comparatively against modern budget games. And I really hope it works out well for them, to the point that other companies get in the act - I'd love the Sega back catalog on the Revolution too...

      *I think they added the ability to save high scores thing to my copy of Xevious. But no significant features.

      --
      I quit!
    3. Re:Not free by rinks · · Score: 1

      I agree, it's totally up to them. But, from owning a DS and Gamecube previously, I can say that as far as any online system goes, they are clueless. I still can't find 4 people WORLDWIDE to play me in Mario Kart. From past quotes, they don't seem to get it. I like the idea of these updated games- but, on the other hand, is a sign that nintendo needs to leave the hardware business and concentrate on games (ala Sega).

      --
      My good looks paid for that pool, and my talent filled it with water.
    4. Re:Not free by tepples · · Score: 1

      I take it you've never actually played a "NES Classics" series GBA game.

      7Prime may have been referring to Super Mario Advance 1 and 4, which were ported from a Super NES game that was in turn ported from the NES version. But then in Dr. Mario, you do get wireless multiplayer with the Pokémon adapter.

  87. "Jail time," wtf? by eldavojohn · · Score: 0

    I clicked on the link for "jail time" but all I got was a report of police handing out vouchers to obnoxious fans. No one's "braving" jailtime. Let me know when this hits NIN concert level then I'll be interested.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  88. Half of Gamers Waiting by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just spotted this little bit of news at Gamespot about how half of surveyed "active" gamers said they would wait until they had choice before buying in to the next generation.

    Well at least I know I'm not alone. ;)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:Half of Gamers Waiting by melbafuckingtoast · · Score: 1

      I just buy them all. I cannot resist shiny things! Therefore my 'choice' is illusionary/delusionary.

  89. Re:I admit it by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

    3.) The name is stupid and personifies what I hate about this machine and its community. Microsoft's marketing drones, in trying to decide how they'd market to drooling middle school gamers, thought "Well, gee, they'll see the '3' after Playstation 3 and think it's better than the '2' after X-Box 2. But we can't call it X-Box 3." Then they turn to their young, "dynamic" new guy they hired from an MTV marketing firm. "What would sound hardcore and hip to the kiddies?" "I've got it! It's better than 3, because it's 360!!!" And thus, a stupid market-drone name, X-Box 360, was born.

    Oh, I don't know. I think it's pretty aptly named. It's basically the old XBox with a bit of spin.

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  90. Minimal Microsoft Association by Zo0ok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you examine an XBox-retail-box (at least the one that have been available in stores for display) you can hardly find the Microsoft logotype anywhere. There are just a few small insignificant ones. Obviously Microsoft wants to let the XBox trademark live on its own without too much Microsoft association. Why? Are they not proud of the XBox or fear it will be another commercial failure? Do they think Microsoft makes people think of boring low-quality products? Does their MS logotype not appeal to children? Do they plan to sell the XBox in the future or split the XBox division from the company? Do they think that the XBox as a toy should not be connected with their Server/Business products? Any ideas? Anyone who knows?

  91. Status symbol. by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    all these people that have $500C for a game system with no games?

    Chicks want useless shiny rocks, guys want useless shiny electronics.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  92. Exhaustive? Hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read through the "exhaustive" reviews on HardOCP and Gamespot, and came to the conclusion that they had been done pre-release without ever using actual hardware. It's just a bunch of PR photos and checklist specifications. There isn't even an mention of FPS for games they played, much less, say, photos of the inside. Little things like that, you know?

    And IMO an "exhaustive" review would probably have things like, say, measuring the read latency of caches and RAM, benchmarking the CPU, etc. The XBOX 360 has a brand new PPC CPU design in it - why the f*ck is nobody benchmarking it? I'm sure most gamers don't care about things like that, but personally I care a lot - the only reason I'll buy a PS3 is so I can put Linux on it and use it to write software for Cell. But who, gamer or dev or whatever, gives a damn what kind of package it comes in? Seriously... those reviews were just a bunch of filler.

  93. why I never bought the original Xbox by tomcres · · Score: 1
    They produced a gaming console. It works. You put a game in and it plays. It was in every way visible to the user a standard gaming console. Who cares if the parts inside are Intel and IDE and so forth? They produced a good console with some good games, so people sold it. They didn't dupe anyone.

    Well, I don't know if it's "duping" anyone. I agree, that's going a bit overboard to say that. But I will say, that the one thing that kept me from buying an Xbox was that it basically was just a Pentium III with 64 megs of RAM and a GeForce3 video card. All I had to do was wait a few months and get a PC with better hardware than that for very little more money. True, there are some Xbox-exclusive games, but nothing that would justify my spending $300 on one. The PC is "good enough" for me. I suppose that if I didn't already have a PC or didn't have a need for a PC, then the Xbox might be attractive. But I just could not see having both from a "spending my money wisely" POV.

    1. Re:why I never bought the original Xbox by blank+axolotl · · Score: 1

      >> True, there are some Xbox-exclusive games, but nothing that would justify my spending $300 on one.

      I think that's the whole point of a console, though. You only buy it because of the games that are made for it, not because of the power of the hardware.

      You expect that it will have more and better games than a PC because it is much easier to develop for a conslole, since the hardware is known and stable. If that were not the case, then yes, consoles would be silly things to buy. Consoles are firstmost a developer's dream, and only a user's by that association.

  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. What a deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now there starting them at $1000.00, that's just crazy
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =8236363019

  96. Worst Case Of Rectally-Induced Brain Oxygen... by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    ..Starvation I've seen in a while. WTF would pay $5100 for this thing ?!?

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  97. Re:The last time a company launched a year before. by MrBandersnatch · · Score: 1

    Aye agreed (although I may get a PS3 as well). I doubt the Rev will be $99 at lanch though. $199 I can see, $149....maybe. $99 and Nintendo just wouldnt be taken seriously!

  98. It's called "keeping up with the Jones'"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...although it should be "keeping up with the Cletus'" given what I saw standing in line...

  99. I want one by firesuite · · Score: 1

    Im sorry but right now after the whole rookit thing i dont feel Microsoft are half as bad a Sony..

    --
    *Gratuitous Sig/Plug* Heres my website - firesuite
  100. Controller compatibility? by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    Can any /. 360 users confirm whether the old controller will work in the new console when fitted with a USB plug? I've heard good things about it's USB capabilities, but nowhere has been implicit about this.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  101. Some of the consoles faulty ?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that at least some of the Xbox 360 consoles are faulty... No clear problem is pinpointed at the moment, but one strong cause could be overheating; http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?s=c04af2866 ed9534607ad98ce292b6a3e&showtopic=462099

  102. Re:I admit it by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    advertisers know what they're doing

    No they do not.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  103. And most of them are being resold on eBay by Animats · · Score: 1

    The big "first day demand" may just be resellers stocking up. There are over 5000 xBox 360 auctions on eBay right now. Prices are dropping rapidly.

    1. Re:And most of them are being resold on eBay by WebGangsta · · Score: 1
      AP covers the eBay / XBox360 story as if this is news.

      How many of these eBay consoles do you think are from legitimate flippers (people who purchased at a store and ran to load up their eBay account), and how many do you think are from Microsoft plants to make the 360 look even more scarce? And that could either be MSFT posting the listings themselves, or taking a little money out of their massive Richmond bank account and doing some crazy bidding to jack the prices up and make the news?

      I'm surprised that there's this much of a frenzy online right now, instead of later in the days leading up to Xmas. My guess? 2/3 hype, 1/3 actual panic in the streets.

  104. Meanwhile, in the UK... by payndz · · Score: 1
    The game shops in my town just installed their 360 demo pods (the UK launch isn't until December 2nd). All of them were running Medal Of Duty: Fuck You Adolf, or whatever the WW2 shooter is called.

    Ironically, the store guys showing them off were more impressed by the HD screens on the pods than the actual games themselves. Every time somebody new came along to check it out, the store guy at GameStation took the opportunity to say something like, "This screen's great! Look, you can really see where they haven't anti-aliased this object!"

    As yet, I personally don't see any compelling reason to buy a 360. It's all about the gameplay, not the visuals (I'd rather play Puyo Puyo or Robotron 2084 than Doom 3 any day), and the 360's launch titles are mostly graphical upgrades of games that are already out on PS2 and Xbox. There are no killer - or even severely wounding - apps yet (and after being stung by the disappointment that was Halo 2, I won't be blindly rushing to the shops when Halo 3 turns up).

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  105. Re:The last time a company launched a year before. by gotkube · · Score: 0

    Ah but one can dream. :)

  106. Everyone hates Canada :( by kerv · · Score: 0

    Just so you all know XBOX 360 Lauched in CANADA today too! All those people lining up at best buy will be happy!

  107. Microsoft Screws Up On Release Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the marketing geniuses at Microsoft have struck again. Yesterday I found out that only 20% of the shipments shipped out for release date, meaning 80% of the people (including myself) have to wait for another shipment and hope there is enough to go around.

    Why does Microsoft pull this stunt? They did the EXACT same thing at XBox launch, and I think pulling this crap by not having their stuff together is going to tank them when the PS3 comes out next year.

    Now I'm not bashing Microsoft for once by saying they suck, they are crap, etc.....I think the XBox was and still is an awesome system, I play mine quite frequently...but if you are going to promise a release date with X amount of quantity in the shipment and then you only ship 20% of them and tell everyone else to go home and wait, what effect do you think that has on overall profitability and success?

    Get it together Microsoft. The 360 is an awesome piece of hardware, but if you don't have enough to go around, no one's going to bother getting it and wait for something else to come along with better quantities in stock.

  108. Re:Competing with Google and Yahoo? Wha? by blork101 · · Score: 1

    That's Windows Live, not Xbox Live. And all it is is a Personalised Homepage thing...just like Google and Yahoo!'s offerings. See it here - http://www.live.com/ Yeah, similar names - but not similar enough that you should really get confused.

  109. This thing is too loud and too hot! by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2, Informative

    Way too loud, Way too hot!

    I had it outside my stereo cabinet, I couldn't take the noise. So I put it inside, and it gets far too hot with the door closed, and with the door open it's as loud as outside the box and even hotter! And I even made sure to put the enormous power supply outside the cabinet.

    This stinks. I didn't expect to have to mod my living room to play this thing.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  110. Re:Competing with Google and Yahoo? Wha? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    Ah. Geeze... that's what I get for cutting back on coffee. Let that be a lesson to you all. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  111. how about $2550.00 ?? Completely nuts... by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I checked this auction, with 2 minutes to go, the Xbox360 premium package was bid up to $2550. http://cgi.ebay.com/Microsoft-Xbox-360-Premium-Pac k-Game-console-NEW_W0QQitemZ8234635572QQcategoryZ6 2054QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem I'm in complete and total shock. I would have never pictured myself saying this, but I wish I had pre-ordered an Xbox360... so I could sell it on eBay and more than quadruple my money in one day ! WTF?!? I mean... they're going to make more... you have to pay $2000 extra to have it *now*?!? That doesn't even include a fricking game!!!

    1. Re:how about $2550.00 ?? Completely nuts... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Earlier today I saw some go over $3000. One managed to hit $5000.

    2. Re:how about $2550.00 ?? Completely nuts... by wtmcgee · · Score: 1

      best part?

      he makes the winning bidder pay another 100 bucks to overnight it if they win.

      --
      *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
    3. Re:how about $2550.00 ?? Completely nuts... by bit01 · · Score: 1

      WTF?!?

      Likely, at least some of the sales on eBay are astroturfing by M$ marketing.

      Cheap advertising to put a product on eBay and easy to make it look interesting/valuable with stupid pricing so the real box price looks "reasonable". Quite likely many of the posts in this /. story and of course the story itself are plants by marketing parasites also.

      ---

      The majority of modern marketing is nothing more than an arms race to get mind share. Everybody loses except the parasitic marketing "industry".

  112. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least Super Nintendo described the console accurately. It was a Nintendo with better graphics. The XBox 360 isn't a magic ball that floats in the middle of your living room. If anything, that stupid marketing drone also said, "and a 360 is a revolution! So if we rush out the system first, it'll look like Nintendo stole OUR name!"

    I've played plenty of 360 in the last 15 hours, and Perfect Dark froze up and Quake 4 has load screens longer than the PS2. Need for Speed Most Wanted only looks marginally better than other versions. Tony Hawk doesn't look any better. At least, with the PS3 and Revolution, there are things to be excited about.

  113. Why would I get one? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    What is the motivation for buying one of these beyond some artificial cool factor?

    Gaming? Is there any game available or in development for the XBox2 that can't be played better on a PC?
    Online gaming? Well, the only services I know of can't play with anything except other XBoxes.
    HDTV? Even with 1080i it's still nowhere nere the bare MINIMUM requirement for modern fps games: 1280x1024@100HZni@2xFSAA.
    Media center? If I wanted a media center I'd install MythTV on my Linux box.

    Perhaps this unit might make a nice linux box, who knows? I haven't seen a mod chip for it yet.

    Maybe people just like bending over for Microsoft...

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Why would I get one? by Roguelazer · · Score: 1

      Um. Explain why 1900x1200@4xFSAA is worse than 1280x1024@2xFSAA... I know, it's interlaced. So's the television that most people love and enjoy. Unless you've got amazing vision, anything over 70Hz is irrelevant anyhow, especially on an LCD or plasma screen (where the pixels don't fade out in the fraction of a second that they do on a traditional CRT).

    2. Re:Why would I get one? by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Dunno about you, but I'm wishing I had bought one to sell on ebay. =(

  114. Red Bull Mini Sightings by emidln · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, who else saw the Red Bull Mini Cooper? I spotted one and received some free cans in Springfield, IL at Best Buy. Anywhere else?

  115. Why all this hostility toward Microsoft? by Parkaman · · Score: 1

    Even if the hardware isn't as good as the PS3's will be, Microsoft's still the better choice. With all the touted internet functionality of the new systems, at least we can be faithful that Microsoft's system will be secure without, you know, leaving open any backdoors for hackers or anything...

    --
    "It's entirely personal, though at one remove."
    1. Re:Why all this hostility toward Microsoft? by mirror_ed123 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... did not know you could put the word "secure" with Microsoft in the same sentence. Now I do ... = )

  116. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by micromuncher · · Score: 0

    Ha! I hate Apple. I just hate Microsoft more.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  117. That's the point... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    The single xbox replaces a (cd player / dvd player / surround sound controller / etc). You can lock it in your private quarters in a minute when you leave. All the stuff it replaces, you couldn't feasibly move every time you left the common area. All it takes is yanking out a few cables and stashing it under your bed and locking the door before you leave for class.

    -everphilski-

  118. Putting the X in Xbox by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters must have a serious woody for the Xbox 360. Once again proving that the only kind of box most slashdotters get any action from is a game console.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  119. xbox 360 for sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bought at EB an hour ago.... damienrichter@hotmail.com

  120. I blame GTA by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    Odds are the criminal was hardened by long hours training for theft by playing Grand Theft Auto.
    I'm sure Jack Thompson would agree.
    And now with not one, but two Xbox 360 who knows what heights of evil he will be able to attain?

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  121. I don't get it... by yani · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Honestly I think I'd much rather buy a $400US video card for my PC.

    Maybe I just don't get the appeal of a console, but being policed by a DRM protected system, spoon fed expensive content/games and restricted to a TV or forced to buy a HDTV with a lower resolution than my monitor doesn't appeal to me at all.

  122. Reeeeetarded. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    $500 for a console.

    THINK ABOUT THAT.

    In 6-8 months when the PS3 comes out, it will drop down into the mid 200 range.

    In another year, $199.

    2 years, $149.

    If you really wanna burn $500 so you can have 15 mins of fame with the "omgwtf, I have xbox before you," then more power to you. It's just stupid though considering the games aren't going anywhere and there really isn't anything worthwhile out for it just yet.

    Quake 4? Yeah, out for PC. Maybe if Halo 3 launched with it, I could see the hype (and it would make sense), but that's not the case.

    Same goes for PS3 and Revolution. Unless they're coming out with a handful of epic *QUALITY* games upon launch, MGS4, the next GTA, Final Fantasy 13, etc, it's just a pointless money sink. What, you're gonna spend $500 so you can play Monkey Ball? Damn.

    I know a lot of little slashdot readers will cry over this post, but it's true.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:Reeeeetarded. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Just a follow up to the above - here's a list of all the games that were released with the 360: http://www.gamerankings.com/itemrankings/default_x 360/1029

      This site takes reviews of each game from all different kinds of gaming sites and averages them together. It's actually a very reliable measure to get the quality of a game.

      The highest ranking game is 90% (Perfect Dark Zero). Quake 4 coming in at 77% (not surprising since that game isn't really all that).

      This isn't a troll post, but instead meant to point out that people are rushing out to buy a console that has mediocre games at launch. Now if 2 or 3 of these games were in the 95%+ zone, then there's a good reason to rush out and get it.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    2. Re:Reeeeetarded. by nissu · · Score: 1
      $500 for a console. THINK ABOUT THAT. In 6-8 months when the PS3 comes out, it will drop down into the mid 200 range.
      So? I've spent that 6-8 months happily playing instead of waiting. Buying stuff such as new gaming consoles, HD displays, gaming PCs or whatever is never a good idea financially. You'll nearly always get the same (or comparable) item cheaper if you wait for "a while", or get a better one for the same amount of money you were originally planning to use. However, if you really want something right now, you go out and buy it right now. It's as simple as that.
      If you really wanna burn $500 ... It's just stupid though considering the games aren't going anywhere and there really isn't anything worthwhile out for it just yet.
      Yes there is (for me anyway): Project Gotham Racing 3.
  123. Re:Vancouver - sold out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As of my lunch break @ 12:00 they are all sold out : |

  124. free xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  125. Not free, but a garunteed 360... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    speaking of ebay... a friend of mine is selling his 360 premium back with a bunch of extras a lot cheaper than many of the auctions. check it out if you want:

    360 premium http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =8236339030/

  126. MOD PARENT UP! by Py+to+the+Wiz · · Score: 1

    I swear this is SO true. I remember the last console wars when PS2 and Xbox were both trying to replace the PC / become home entertainment solutions. I ALMOST bought a PS2 when I saw the keyboard and mouse adapter, plus all the hype talking about how soon you would be able to use the PS2 instead of your PC for things like surfing and email. Hell, I thought, a PC for $300 can't be bad right?

    Then there was the Xbox that again was supposed to be the CENTER OF HOME ENTERTAINMENT. I ended up buying an Xbox when I realized that all I really wanted was a gaming system and the Xbox seemed like the best one at the time (graphics-wise). Currently I hardly even use it (all the games I want are on my PC) and really only use it as a $300 DVD player, since it's easier than hooking up my computer to play on my TV.

    --
    Fight the fall of slashdot by supporting PlayfullyClever in your sig.
  127. M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    M$

    Stop it.

  128. Posts like this miss a major point by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sure, maybe a lot of the games *are* available for PC. Is that a bad thing? I'm no Microsoft lover, but come on people, get over it.

    The fact is, a lot of people don't have a 'game pc'. To get a PC that is capable of running a lot of the games, you need to drop like $600-1200 (depending on how much power you want, and you can probably spend more than 1200 if you really want to, I'm sure). An XBox 360, at launch, costs 300 (ebay auctions notwithstanding), and will likely come down in price over time, and is powerful enough to run fairly high-end games.

    Plus, it is much simpler for most users, than trying to get PC games working right. "I need to upgrade my drivers? For my motherboard, video card, sound card? I need to get a better powersupply, because the voltage is dropping during peak processing times"?

    Maybe the XBox was "basically a PC", but it brought PC gaming to people at a lower price, and with less technical hassles. The XBox 360, supposedly, gives the console more power, so developers can potentially develop more computationally complex games (which may or may not be more fun), but continues to be incredibly easy to use, and fairly reasonably priced, for what you get. The same could be said of any console.

    And what the hell is wrong with profit anyhow? Nobody is forced to buy an XBox 360. If they choose to spend the money on it, and Microsoft can make a profit, then I say good for Microsoft. They provided a product that people wanted to buy, and made some money. This is one field where MS doesn't (yet), have a monopoly, and competition is good.

  129. Nothing but hype by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Microsoft's gamespot.com gives a 9.0 to perfect dark with the following:


    The Good: Awesome presentation, featuring cutting-edge graphics and sound; delicious assortment of high-powered near-future weapons; excellent cooperative mission mode lets you play split screen or online; lots of multiplayer options, including some clever twists on familiar themes; one of the best original soundtracks this year.
    The Bad: Characters can look ugly up close, plus some other minor graphical glitches; some missions are frustrating, especially since you can't save midmission; pretty weak storyline is incidental to all the action.


    So it has an awesome presentation (WTF is that anyway?) but a pretty weak storyline, incidental to all the action?
    It also has cutting-edge graphics, but characters can look ugly up close, plus some other minor graphical glitches.

    Let me reword that then for you gamespot:
    The Good: Great sound and soundtrack. Excellent coop mode, and great weapons.
    The Bad: Frustrating missions, weak storyline.
    The Ugly: Characters upclose.

    And this is the best of the show?

    This one is on Sony and Nintendo to lose...

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  130. Re:I admit it by snuf23 · · Score: 1

    "Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System. They also make media apps. Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us."

    They also publish a lot of game software for PCs and have done so for a long time. Since Windows 95 came out and their push for DirectX (OpenGL fans go ahead and bitch all you want about it - it's still better than the hell of DOS games) they have published games by some pretty good developers:

    Rise of Nations
    Age of Empires (all of them and Age of Mythology)
    Mechwarrior
    Flight Simulator
    Dungeon Siege

    --
    Sometimes my arms bend back.
  131. Lack of 360s? by Almighty+Pallbearer · · Score: 1

    If it's anything like this guys story, the majority of us won't be getting one until next year. Why supply nearly half of the demand? Is this a ploy to get people to buy the core system so they can milk them for the accessory prices later? This was such a bonehead mistake by Microsoft. They should have staggered the console release since they now have such a dramatic shortage it isn't even funny. I know I won't be getting one well into next year.

  132. Profiting by leabre · · Score: 1

    If I were a store owner, which I'm not, but if I were, I would have not allowed anyone to purchase a 360 on opening day, and then taken the lot of 40 xboxes and auctioned them on Ebay for what people are willing to pay (just saw one close at $3,890 without any games). Seems a better way to make a buck. Is it moral or ethical? No. But if people are willing to pay, perhaps its not unethical, at least not to the person paying. Note to self... when the xbox 640 is release, prepare in advance for the feeding frenzy to follow.

    Thanks,
    Leabre

  133. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us."

    Well, personally, I'm a bit annoyed that consoles get almost all the interesting games nowadays. I would infinitely prefer to just have one PC than 3 consoles, each with their own controllers, wires, power bricks and special peripherals hooked up under the tv. Especially since I need to own a PC anyway.

    And that 3 is a conservative number by the way. If I had the space I'd have GC/N64/SNES/Xbox/Xbox2/DC/Saturn/PS2 all hooked up. My PC plays every game I ever got for it (using DOSbox for the old stuff), all in one system.

    Competition amongst consoles is bad, because they're getting good enough to kill an open platform with a closed one based on disposable systems. And Microsoft, who are basically the godfathers of PC gaming, are also helping destroy it with Xbox when they should be competing right back on PC gaming's behalf.

    For instance, your point about console gaming being easier and more couch-friendly - PCs are perfectly capable of sitting under a TV with 4 controllers on them, it's the software that's lacking and MS could be busy fixing it.

    Hmm, bit offtopic this, might as well go AC...

  134. Re:Not Trolling, just wrong by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    Might I remind them politely that they can get a computer for the same price, and it can do games and everything else the XBox 360 can do

    How did you get "insightfull" writing that? You might as well have said for $50 you can go find an old C64.

    No $500C computer is going to be able to come close to touching what you can get for the $300/$400 USD you're going to get with the Xbox2.

    Some people do love the next-gen stuff. Games like Madden 06 and PGR3 do look next-gen, albeit 1st-gen next-gen. It's technically a pretty big damn upgrade. And I'm looking forward to buying one. I certainly aint going to get anything looking close to that good on a computer. Not only could a $500C touch it in specs, developing for a specific arch. lets developers push it to the limits easier. There's a lot of things going for it. And games a huge enough industry now that a new release of a console is big news. You don't like it or want one, your call. But it's easy to understand why there's hype, and your assertions were not accurate.

  135. Hey slacker by gelfling · · Score: 1

    stop talking shit - I couldn't give a fuck if it was MS or MartianSoft so STFU

  136. Pre-orders cut by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    A friend I knew pre-ordered a few months ago - but most places you can pre-order from got such limited quantities that they were not going to get one - the retailer said until after Christmas.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  137. KISS by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Are people just trying to screw over the people selling xboxs, or are they microsoft droids hoping to make the nightly news...

    Knowing eBay, my vote is for the screwing.

    If I were selling one I'd put a minimum of five positive comments as a requirement and kick all other bidders.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:KISS by tepples · · Score: 1

      If I were selling one I'd put a minimum of five positive comments as a requirement and kick all other bidders.

      How does one legitimately earn positive comments on eBay?

  138. Re:I admit it by bhunachchicken · · Score: 1

    "1. "Microsoft sooo does not belong in the game console market. They make Office software, for Christ's sake.""

    "Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System."

    I think most Slashdot readers would agree that's up for debate as well... ;)

  139. Why would anyone do that? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Pick up an "old" XBox now that the new one is being sold? Doesn't seem like many people would want to do that, if the goal is to buy a 360 buying something cheaper now that you'll just replace in a few months is just a waste of money.

    Of course that's why I'm not buying a 360, because models with HD-DVD/Blu-Ray drives are inevitable and I'd not want to replace that system in six months.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  140. Mono + no VCD, what's the point? by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

    According to an article here at /. if you don't have a home theatre you get mono audio (oh boy!) and they still haven't incorporated VCD support....

    I'm also still waiting to see if this new system has the trouble of disk-read errors that plague the Xbox beta(tm)....

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
  141. Got mine at WalMart... but almost a ****ing riot by Darth+Cow · · Score: 1

    I arrived at my local Walmart at around 10:30 last night ready to camp out until the store opened at 7am. I was the first one there. Other folks started showing up around 11:00-11:30 and we heard from multiple employees that there were only 14 Xboxes.

    Some of my friends showed up around 11:30 and that was it for the 14 folks in line. We circulated our own list with our names in order and that was that. Or it should have been.

    We bundled up, sat in cars pulled up to the curb in front of the store or under the overhang and waited it out until around 5:30 am or so. A number of people showed up in the night, but we told them there were only 14 Xboxes and they were too late, so they left.

    At about 5:30 people started showing up convinced that they could barge their way through to get an Xbox. By 6am my friends and I had packed up our blankets, tossed our junk in the car, and everyone was standing up in a mob in front of the store doors.

    At this point, we've got about 30 extra people who plan to rush in to get the Xbox even though they didn't wait all night in line. Somebody from the management of Walmart comes outside and says they're going to use the list of 14 people, and everyone else can just go home.

    Nobody leaves, though. Some of newcomers are especially obnoxious, particularly one big guy who threatens to literally run me over in order to an Xbox in front of me and eventually starts complaining about how I "put my hands on him" since he bumped into my elbow, despite my hands remaining in my pockets the entire time. Nevermind this guy is about twice my size, and I have no desire whatsoever to fight him. Ue's being extremely loud and boisterous as he bangs on the glass doors and repeatedly states his intent bulldoze down anyone between him and the Xbox.

    We're calling the Walmart from cellphones to make sure they'll use the list and keep order. They aren't very commital but certainly want to maintain order. We warn them that they may have an angry mob on their hands. Some police arrive half an hour or so before they open the doors.

    At 7am, a Walmart employee opens not main double automatic doors my friends and I had been congregating around to insure we get it, but a sidedoor directly to the left of them. They just let people, holding us back so we go one at a time and once they get 14 or so of us they stop. I managed to squeeze in since I was on that side of the door and one of my friends gets let in by the assistant manager he had talked with last night before everyone showed up.

    They've got us in the anteroom and then it's a mad rush back to the electronics section to get first in line to get the four premium versions in stock. The asshole from earlier in the story got let in with the first 14 people and then squeezes into the second place in line at the electronics desk with girlfriend after showing up after everyone else.

    There is some justice in the world, though. The asshole managed to get in a fight over a wireless controller and got himself arrested after a number of people waiting outside volunteered to testify against him. He was led out in handcuffs (but he did get his premium edition... grr...).

    At least I got an Xbox, but about half of those who had waited overnight (including a couple of my friends) did not. The manager did let in one 7 month pregnant woman when they opened the side door who had waited all night to buy an Xbox for her boyfriend. There's no way she could have ran for it. But still, it's pretty outrageous Walmart couldn't maintain order and keep a line.

  142. Re:I admit it by CommiePuddin · · Score: 1

    [Game 1] froze up and [Game 2] has load screens longer than the [previous-Gen system]. [Game 3] only looks marginally better than [previous-Gen games]. [Game 4] doesn't look any better. At least, with [something we haven't seen yet], there are things to be excited about.

    Congratulations, you just expressed the "pre-order letdown" of every console since the Sega Genesis.

    --
    x = x + ++x; //It's golden.
  143. Argh! Preview! by CommiePuddin · · Score: 1

    Son of a! Stupid buttons next to each other. *sigh*

    --
    x = x + ++x; //It's golden.
  144. Re:Not Trolling, just wrong by saskboy · · Score: 1

    "You might as well have said for $50 you can go find an old C64. "

    Sure, and some people would get as much enjoyment out of that $50, as they would for $500 getting a gameless core XBox 360.

    The difference between a $500C computer and the core XBox 360 is that the computer has access to hundreds of free games and thousands more you can pay for for a lot less than $70C a game. And everything else you can do with a computer and can't with the XBox. You're paying a premium for the cutting edge, specialized 360 console.

    "and your assertions were not accurate"
    But they are, under a certain outlook. It's not the case for everyone, but in the subjective world of opinion they certainly stand up to reason.

    There's hype, but we don't have to like it being shoved down our throats.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  145. Xbox 360 Crash!!! BSOD (Black) by jsgongwon · · Score: 2, Informative
    With retail Xbox360, with all default settings and on first lap of race track on Project Gotham Racing 3, single player, crashed 3 times in a row. So far haven't been able to play one track without crashing... Also got this crashing on Xbox Live screen and on startup too... Here are some screenshots:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65990154 /

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65990156 /

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65990158 /

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65990159 /

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65995966 /

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/80491849@N00/65995967 /

    1. Re:Xbox 360 Crash!!! BSOD (Black) by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      The checkerboard pattern indicates a bad GPU quad - it's a hardware problem that happens sometimes. Usually it's caught in QA, but it appears that TSMC has been slacking off as of late.

      Many GPUs are sold with a disabled quad as a "value" edition - the Radeon 9500, 9800SE, x800 Pro/LE, and a number NVIDIA products are all parts with the broken quad (or quads) disabled.

    2. Re:Xbox 360 Crash!!! BSOD (Black) by jsgongwon · · Score: 1

      Here's a video of the crash (9MB - 20 seconds) http://x900.putfile.com/videos/3260052289.mpg

  146. Re:I admit it by kai.chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lest you forget, they also make an Operating System. They also make media apps. Why are you upset about greater competition in the console market? That should benefit all of us.

    How long do you think this "competition" will last? The console market is not currently profitable at Microsoft, but they have their sights at the long term. And do you know what the long term goal is? Allow me illustrate to you their goal with evidence from Microsoft's hisotry of business practices:

    Microsoft will keep throwing money at the problem to gain market share. And once they get rid of Sony, they will eventually out-last Nintendo as well. And when they do, do not expect Microsoft to provide any innovation.

    They are notorious for taking over markets and then stop putting any Research and Development money into their monopolies. In other words, since they are saving money on R&D once they have a monopoly, they make profit for years to come. At the same time, Microsoft stifle innovation because the money that consumers give them gets no return in terms of R&D.

    As consumers, we lose when Microsoft takes over a market. Microsoft's entry into the console market DOES NOT benefit us in the long run.

  147. and this has what to do with the xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You didn't like the drm in the Sony CDs? Well the XBox line is DRM incarnate. Many people have speculated the XBox line is the prototype hardware for palladium. And at least Sony backed down on the DRM CDs thing. Microsoft shows no signs of stopping...

  148. Re: Heating bills by erasmus42 · · Score: 1

    Not everyone lives in Saskatchewan. I hear that they have something called "the sun" in places farther
    south. I bet most Americans would get a kick out of us plugging in our cars in the winter. Also, here
    in Alberta people have much higher disposable incomes. It's like that in many other parts of the
    country. $500 is a lot in Saskatchewan, not so much elsewhere.

    - A fellow Saskie

    (p.s. go to Vancouver sometime, they have green grass there all year long)

  149. "You won't pay much, but you'll pay." by tulsileaf · · Score: 1

    You'll pay for this! Muahahahahaha!!

    --
    - tlf
  150. Re: Heating bills by saskboy · · Score: 1

    SK may be one of the poorer provinces, but $500 is a lot in any place, it just isn't treated that way. As long as someone's healthy, it's hard to imagine a more safe and rich lifestyle than someone can have living in Saskatchewan [and yes I've lived in other places and travelled all around North America]. Excesses may be more common in Alberta, and it's not surprising, they've managed to exploit their natural resources more efficiently than SK has, and has made use of SK's human resources better too.

    Tell someone in Myanmar or India that $500 isn't a lot. There are a heck of a lot more people in the world that would find $500 to be a life changer, than there are well to do Canadians that would snort at it.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  151. Slashdot Evil-Meter by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

    Guys, I'm confused. Which next gen console should I buy? Now that Sony is evil too I'm stuck. Can we have some kind of Slashdot "Evil Index" so that we can chose the lesser of two evils in a reliable way?

    1. Re:Slashdot Evil-Meter by JackAxe · · Score: 1

      I'm buying a Revolution. Nintendo has been in the "good" on the evil-meter for years. They haven't been in the evil since the N64 days. :) They didn't even fall into the evil-BS hype that sucked Sony and MS in this past E3. They're the only company that has really never overpromised, but yet always broken new grounds.

      The last thing I want is another 4-6 years of everything I've been bored with for the past 3 or 4 years, so Nintendo's offereings are the only choice that really makes sense in my book. Ironic how a compnay that produce games based on the same characters over and over, is the only one that manages to actually produce something new and fresh in this industry of the same.

  152. Re:I admit it by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

    3.) The name is stupid and personifies what I hate about this machine and its community. Microsoft's marketing drones, in trying to decide how they'd market to drooling middle school gamers, thought "Well, gee, they'll see the '3' after Playstation 3 and think it's better than the '2' after X-Box 2. But we can't call it X-Box 3." Then they turn to their young, "dynamic" new guy they hired from an MTV marketing firm. "What would sound hardcore and hip to the kiddies?" "I've got it! It's better than 3, because it's 360!!!" And thus, a stupid market-drone name, X-Box 360, was born.

    ...I don't care that you're modded flamebiat, I hold generally the same opinion. I don't see someone's opinion as flamebait.... but either way.

    This naming convention blows me away... though, I do think it rather clever that Nintendo played off of that with the name "Revolution", that is 360 as well.

    Assuming they played off the name, in case...nevermind

  153. Re:Not Trolling, just wrong by Liquidrage · · Score: 1

    The difference between a $500C computer and the core XBox 360

    is that the Xbox360 is going to be able to offer a lot more performance for games then what that $500C computer is going to give you. And mind you, we're really talking $300 and $400 USD, not $500C. So where's the premium? You couldn't build that system on your own for that cheap.
    You're not going to touch a computer system that will give you comparable "oooomph" in the game world for that price. Go price a video card, mobo and cpu and ram, in the mid-upper performance range, and let me know when you can get them for $300. Don't come back with a 9700 Pro and Athlon 2600+ and tell me you've done it either. It's not on the same level. There's no premium. You're actually getting decent deals compared to comparable PC's when you buy consoles when they are fairley new.

    And no one is shoving the hype down your throat. You *clicked* on the link to read this thread. There are three major consoles making companies in the world. Three. For a giant market. And one of those is releasing their newest kid on the black. This *is* a pretty big event. There should be some hype. The day people break into my house and force me to read threads about crap I don't care about is the day I'll agree something is being shoved down my throat.

  154. So that explains BestBuy's Xbox360 extortion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you sell to a customer, you can often get them to purchase multiple other items they may not need or did not think of.

    Now it is even more likely when you have companies like Microsoft demanding that people must buy two games to go with their xbox, and you making sure sure people pay your protection plan!

  155. Adventures at Wal-Mart by LearningHard · · Score: 1

    My fiance and her little brothers went to the local Wal-Mart yesterday to see the line for the xbox360. There were a couple of dozen people there, maybe 30 tops. The funny part is that there were 14 occupied chairs. Crystal then noticed a sign that there were 14 xbox360s available and that if you were sitting in a chair you would get one otherwise you were out of luck. I guess the other people were just sitting there hoping others would drop dead or something.

    That evening I mentioned to her profit opportunity presented by supply and demand. She didn't believe me until I showed her the xbox360 auctions today. Now she is asking me why I didn't make her by 10 or 11 xbox360s to resale.

  156. To those who managed to get one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy your Xbox360 & games!

    Yes it is a shame that those of us, who prefer to wait a while before buying a new console, will miss out on all the fun.

  157. MS Screwed the pooch, XBOX Issues Already by up2ng · · Score: 1

    XBOX overheating, Black Screen of death, etc.
    Go here for details.

    http://forums.xbox-scene.com/index.php?showtopic=4 62099

    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
    1. Re:MS Screwed the pooch, XBOX Issues Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot? It's a given that at least 1% of pcs or consoles are going to be defective once out the door, even with extensive testing. Yes, even with apple. A whole 12 replies out of millions sold, ya sure, thats "screwing the pooch."

    2. Re:MS Screwed the pooch, XBOX Issues Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot? It has only been one day, it isn't like all the defects occure and are found right away.

      And how are we to know there are not more people suffering from the same problems? 12 of them might have bitched about it online, but there might be a lot more offline.

  158. Re:I admit it by sj88 · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Microsoft loyalist/employees are out in full force. Mod the parent flamebait while mod the pro-Microsoft reply as insightful.

    The parent had valid points, and if it's flamebait, that's only because the viewer is overprotective of anything Microsoft or Xbox 360.

  159. I won't be switching from my Xbox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...until at LEAST 75% of my games are backwards compatible. I'm not throwing away my investment in games. Since only 1/3 of my current library will work on the 360 (and THAT only if Microsoft don't, as they've reserved the ability to, change their mind and remove games from the list), I have no incentive to stay with Microsoft. If the majority of my games don't work on the 360, I may as well switch to Sony's console if I feel it to be technically better than the 360.

  160. How about $12,100.00 by commander_gallium · · Score: 1

    $12,100.00
    Twelve thousand dollars... Plus shipping.

  161. Not with xbox360 by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

    It's different with the 360: all chips are now Microsoft owned. THey bought all the IP. See anandtech's article about dissecting an xbox360 recently.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  162. Microsoft eBay Fraud by totuck · · Score: 1
    A few people are carrying stories that Xbox 360 units are going for exorbitant prices on eBay. I've checked out the auctions and it seems like there is a huge proportion of bidders who have either only a few feedback points or none at all. Many bidders even have symbols next to their screen names indicating that their account is less than 30 days old. Why are so many eBay virgins willing to pay premium prices for an Xbox 360?

    It seems that some sort of massive fraud is going on here. The sellers themselves may simply be propping up the prices on their own auctions. Or, even more sinister and genius, a third party (Microsoft?) is following up Microsoft's deliberate Xbox shortage plan with a plan to inflate the eBay market as well. The fact that Xbox 360 units are selling on eBay for about $1000, there is a lot of money at steak here and what better way to show how wonderful and popular the new system is than by populating the press with stories of people so desperate for an Xbox that the system is selling for $1000?

    Crazy conspiracy theory? Brilliant plot uncovered? What do you think?

  163. any poor phuck can afford one. by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Dude, are you that poor you earn $2 a n hour and it will take you weeks to save for one like
    a SNES did in 1987?? Dude people paid $4000 in equiv 2005 dollars for amigas etc....

    Get some reality check, this isnt expensive, its all new silicon.

    How do you define cost, the first 12months are always 100% return on R&D, ie 1 billion dollars, / 2 million people = $500 each.

    1 weeks wages = the maximum cost since 1992

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  164. Independent games? by tepples · · Score: 1

    There are many of us out here who don't need our PCs to program on, we have them for games, other entertainment, e-mail, and surfing.

    It's not that you want to program for a given machine, but that someone else in the community wants to program for it and give you the results. The problem is that consoles tend to have few or no independent games because the console makers, who control access to the secret bootloader, historically have only talked to established publishers who have already proven themselves in the PC or arcade business.

    Playing DvDs is a bonus, if it means one less component I have to hook up or keep up with all the better.

    The good thing about making a game console cheaper by leaving out the DVD player is that you can afford to buy a separate DVD player and then use the DVD player on one TV and the console on another.

  165. Investment and cash flow by tepples · · Score: 1

    Funding would be an investment, not a charge to the console.

    But investment does show up on the cash-flow number, even if it is eventually amortized over the expected five-year newestness of a console.

  166. Stepping up from volunteering? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Dude, are you that poor you earn $2 a n hour and it will take you weeks to save for one like a SNES did in 1987??

    I have a college degree, and despite using both CareerBuilder and Monster, I can't even seem to get an interview anymore, let alone a job. Currently I've been working for $0.00 an hour plus lunch at a local VA hospital.

  167. A "second launch" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yet nobody seems to be denying that the 360 is being targeted exclusively to one single demographic

    Microsoft can initially manufacture only enough units to target one demographic at a time. The "second launch" will happen when both the games and the manufactured consoles are ready for a wider audience. The Nintendo DS as well had a "second launch" when Kirby: Canvas Curse and Nintendogs came out in North America.

  168. Modding your console? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Stop gaming and write code for fun instead.

    If you write code, then it won't even run without a modding method because almost all the major consoles and handhelds (PStwo, Xbox, GameCube, Xbox 360, DS, PSP, but not the GBA SP) have a secret bootloader. Fortunately, there are a multitude of modding methods for, say, the Nintendo DS.

  169. Obligatory Penny-Arcade Comic by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Here's Penny Arcade's take on the issue.

    That link will probably only work until Friday. I would have linked to the permanant link, but that, of course, does not work (at least, not yet).

  170. Re:I admit it by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft will keep throwing money at the problem to gain market share. And once they get rid of Sony, they will eventually out-last Nintendo as well. And when they do, do not expect Microsoft to provide any innovation."

    Well, there are a lot of differences between the console market today, and the markets in which MS was able to corner. I suggest you compare those markets, and ask yourself the following questions:

    Is there established competition, with deep pockets, in the market?

    Is it an emerging market?

    Is interoperability with other systems an issue for the product?

    Is there high-demand content available only with a competitors product?

    Also, I'd like to point out that the nature of gaming consoles is such that every few years, there will be an opportunity for someone else to produce a competing product. If MS chooses not to pour money into R&D for consoles, there is no way they could retain control of the market, even if they could get a monopoly.

    Finally, MS spends a lot on R&D, even when they are in a dominating market position. A lot of that R&D is outsourced (either directly, or buy purchasing R&D companies/technologies).

    I don't know how you can claim that MS's entry is a Bad Thing(tm). Do you think Sony or Nintendo would waste millions of R&D cash if either of them had a monopoly? I understand you're ill will towards MS, I feel the same way. But I can't see the console wars playing out the way the browser wars did (and look, MS continued to spend on R&D there!).

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  171. Who's the idiot ? by up2ng · · Score: 1
    --
    Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire.
  172. Where can I get me a Super NES copier? by tepples · · Score: 1

    In my case I need high WAF (Wife Acceptance Factor), and a PC by the TV doesn't have much WAF.

    You also have to worry about the LEAF (law enforcement acceptance factor). In some countries, case mods for a PC are deemed much more legitimate than modchips for a console.

    I'd say nicer than a computer simply because a menu is simpler than navigating an OS GUI.

    There are several GUI launchers that have been customized for launching emulators.

    SNES emulation is flawless

    But how did you copy the ROM images from your Super NES and Sega Genesis cartridges so that you could use them with your modded Xbox console? You answered it about the PS1, but not about the Sega Genesis and Super NES.

    1. Re:Where can I get me a Super NES copier? by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1
      You also have to worry about the LEAF (law enforcement acceptance factor). In some countries, case mods for a PC are deemed much more legitimate than modchips for a console.

      I suppose it depends on where you live. But the beauty of the Xbox (original) is you can software-mod it (softmod). A cheap used copy of MechAssault or Splinter Cell and an Action Replay is all the physical junk in your hand you need to put linux on the Xbox. The rest is just a software download which forces a buffer overflow in the game and install your mod. I don't see why anyone would pay money for either a pre-hacked Xbox nor a modchip, when it is so easy to do it yourself. And this way it is your own equipment.

      There are several GUI launchers that have been customized for launching emulators.

      I meant for the kids. Well, I suppose for me, too. Some of the launchers/menus for a linux'ed Xbox are very simple, pretty much just copy the discs to the harddrive and it pops up in the menu selector. And most software has a unique logo which they can rely on to pick the game they want to play.

      But how did you copy the ROM images from your Super NES and Sega Genesis cartridges so that you could use them with your modded Xbox console?

      You'd need an old GameDoctor or the like. There used to be an import place nearby that sold all this junk (also carried the excellent Hori joysticks for Playstation). Alas, he went outta business years ago. I guess they weren't all that popular here. There's a fella in the UK who I think still sell them off his website. http://www.robwebb.clara.co.uk/shop/
      Unfortunately, the elusive quest to find that rare game isn't the same anymore because of eBay, and because there are so many places online to find the dumps.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
  173. Sell or buy by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    How does one legitimately earn positive comments on eBay?

    I think what you are getting at is - if everyone does this however do you earn comments?

    The most direct answer to that of course is simply sell a few things. Note I did not say to never buy from a zero-comment buyer - though it's always more risky and people will not pay as much.

    However the real answer is that I did not say EVERYTHING should be sold only to people with five or more positive comments - only larger and really hot things like the 360. If I'm selling anything under even $50 or so, I generally let anyone big without kicking them out. After all, people have to get good comments somewhere...

    Note also that I was only saying what I would do as an experienced seller. Due to the glut of product on eBay, there are plenty of other 360's for zero-comment folk to bid on - just not mine (if I had one but I don't). So that too is another option for comments, to buy from people that don't know any better than to trust a zero-comment enigma.

    An alternate rule is if you have comments on a bidder from non-payyment, kick them immediatley. There was one guy whoe bought a small thing from me, and kept saying he was going to pay - never did. Then I come to look over his comments and found his favorite hobby was bidding on vending equipment and not paying for it either. He also had some shady looking ads up in Craigsliist New York.

    So sellers - use the power of the bid cancel to get rid of people who look questionable!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley