I'm quite sure these anti-virus companies must be having people dedicated to writing viruses so that they can remain in business. If people stopped writing viruses, these companies would have to shut down. They probably cannot afford to let this happen.
If fact, if I have a security product, the best way to demonstrate and market it to a company would be to hack their systems and then appear out of nowhere and be the savior. Savvy.
More often than not, I've seen people putting in comments that explain the code:
int i = 1;//initialize i
I mean, what sense does that make?? The mistake most programmers make is they comment the code and not the intent of the code. Some people write the code first and then comment it. Often times, the actual algorithm doesn't reveal itself at all in these comments. The reader keeps wondering what the hell is going on. I have tried to understand one such algorithm that used several different heuristics for accomplishing a particular purpose. The "code" for this function was more than 1000 lines and it was sparsely commented. It outlined the "intent" of what it wanted to do. But the code was too darn confusing. The sheer amount of variables that were used made it very hard to actually keep in mind what was going on.
What I have learned is that you cannot "understand" code that is written by someone else and is complicated. You will be limited by your intelligence in trying to understand that code. The only thing you can do is fix some bug that may arise.
IF the fabric absorbs the energy, it has to get rid of it in some way. Assuming a person is wearing a suit made of this fabric, the energy of the explosion will be passed on to the wearer in which case, the guy/gal will explode inside or melt inside while wearing the damn suit. If not, it will have to be radiated as heat in which case also, the wearer will suffer massive burns.
...Ever hear of the Afghan commander who was confined to a 4'x4' cell with only Windows ME and a keyboard missing the Ctrl, Alt and Del keys?? My hair stands on end thinking about the poor man's ordeal. Last I heard he was being treated for massive depression...
If you click on the images you will find the text...
If you click on the images you will find the text... You don't find the text, the text finds you; if you want it to.
a doughnut-shaped cloud of gas and dust that surrounds and feeds a budding supermassive black hole. Is it just me, or does Dubya come to everyone's mind?
Slashdot Mirror
Uh I presume you mean that the helicopter has your wife inside when you shine the laser? Ingenious!
Must be King Leonidas. Damn those crazy spartans.
My sysadmin does something similar to the waggle dance everytime a user reports incessant porn pop-ups.
....too much broccoli at dinner?
I'm quite sure these anti-virus companies must be having people dedicated to writing viruses so that they can remain in business. If people stopped writing viruses, these companies would have to shut down. They probably cannot afford to let this happen. If fact, if I have a security product, the best way to demonstrate and market it to a company would be to hack their systems and then appear out of nowhere and be the savior. Savvy.
They want us to let them monitor use of their program?? Don't they do that already???
...welcome our new 100x evolving human... ZZZZTTTTTT WTF??? Why aren't you neanderthals welcoming me??
More often than not, I've seen people putting in comments that explain the code:
//initialize i
int i = 1;
I mean, what sense does that make?? The mistake most programmers make is they comment the code and not the intent of the code. Some people write the code first and then comment it. Often times, the actual algorithm doesn't reveal itself at all in these comments. The reader keeps wondering what the hell is going on. I have tried to understand one such algorithm that used several different heuristics for accomplishing a particular purpose. The "code" for this function was more than 1000 lines and it was sparsely commented. It outlined the "intent" of what it wanted to do. But the code was too darn confusing. The sheer amount of variables that were used made it very hard to actually keep in mind what was going on.
What I have learned is that you cannot "understand" code that is written by someone else and is complicated. You will be limited by your intelligence in trying to understand that code. The only thing you can do is fix some bug that may arise.
IF the fabric absorbs the energy, it has to get rid of it in some way. Assuming a person is wearing a suit made of this fabric, the energy of the explosion will be passed on to the wearer in which case, the guy/gal will explode inside or melt inside while wearing the damn suit. If not, it will have to be radiated as heat in which case also, the wearer will suffer massive burns.
...the brain maps you!
...Ever hear of the Afghan commander who was confined to a 4'x4' cell with only Windows ME and a keyboard missing the Ctrl, Alt and Del keys??
My hair stands on end thinking about the poor man's ordeal. Last I heard he was being treated for massive depression...
...i read it as 'floating commuters keep an eye on oceans' :) My bad.
...does the live-docs version of XL have the Flight Simulator?
..if they fix the spots, then is it still a leopard?
I'd love to give Windows a fast, heavy, military boot straight up its arse.
Why don't they just use a firewall? I mean, literally.
Don't have any IT policies at all. The tighter you grip, the faster the sand will slip through from between your fingers.
Free your mind.
...virtually impossible.
1) http://www.dubyasworld.com/dubya-quit-thinking.jpg
2) http://www.geocities.com/calann@sbcglobal.net/dubya.jpg
I've got a baaaad feelin about this one...
4000 colors ought to be enough for everybody.
...the "In Soviet Russia..." jokes?
Uhh, aren't you talking about hairy ears ?