Like Discord for Linux, Skype for Linux Beta is essentially Skype for Web wrapped in Electron, which is a special-purpose web browser using Blink (the engine of Chrome) specialized for one site at a time.
While some frameworks can use CSS for styling or even HTML for layout they only partially use of javascript for event handling, I think the lesson here should be clear: never go full javascript.
The problem here is that Intel has no legal basis to threaten anyone over x86, so instead they are just blowing smoke to scare away investors using the press. Both side know that Intel's x86 patents have expired and AMD owns all the patents for x86_64 which is also known by it's original name AMD64. Since Intel is now powerless, they are reverting back to their old anti-competitive habits.
I'm just wondering if much of electorate that placed these people in power have gazed into the abyss of populism and seen that darkness ahead. I certainly hope so because there is still time to set things right in the world.
Jan Sloot had some ideas on how to compress things and despite hyping it up, he had gotten nowhere close to anything functional. With all the hype he generated, he had a deal lined up for the technology but he didn't have the goods. The stress of the impending revelation of his fraud caused him to suffer cardiac arrhythmia and he died. The source code was never found because it never existed.
Speaking after Saturday's London attack, Mrs May said "enough is enough" and that "things need to change" in the terror fight.
The death and injury of people is tragic but destroying the rights of your own people is just idiotic. Terrorists aren't killing millions, they killed maybe 100 in the last decade. More people die from drowning than terrorist attacks!
If he wanted to do something disruptive then he would have made a phone with a removable battery or one that actually lasts for a week. What we really have here is just another Android phone.
Just proves democrats aren't that smart Trump keeps making a fool of himself. Why would anyone opposed to his agenda want to muzzle him?
It seems more likely that this question was not framed in a "political game of war" context. Only the most partisan individuals consider everything using an "us versus them" mentality.
When everyone's only goal is to "win," we all lose.
They have been particularly good at exposing how petty, dimwitted, bigoted and foolish he is, not just as a president but as a person. I think it's important for people to understand just kind of a person they vote for, even if it's after the fact.
.. on the issue of why women developers are hard to recruit and keep in the business of tech.
Without any statistical information to as the rate at which and reason why both men and women have chosen to leave their positions at a multitude of "tech" businesses, the very premise of this article is based on a judgement without merit. Literally speaking, it's prejudice, specifically sexist.
It's just a joke. The only x86 chips I've used in the past decade have been AMD chips. I was disappointed when they added an equivalent of the IME and have begun seeking other avenues for processing.
Cable TV deserves to fail. Those assholes have overcharged everyone for decades because they had a monopoly on access to content. In another century, every last one of them would be tarred, feathered and run out of town only to die slowly from infection. I have no sympathy for people who gleefully exploit the general population.
They're the 0.1% who receive representation by congress when everyone else does not.
Absolutely! This is why we need political campaign finance reform. When you level the playing field with elections, you are more likely to get someone that is more representative of the people.
That they can be ousted or resisted by picking one of their political parties is laughable. They decide who wins the primaries, then we get to pick from their candidate pool
We only need to limit the reach of their influence. It's like cutting the strings on a marionette doll, once cut there is a loss of control.
The choice between D and R isn't freedom or representation, but a box to contain us.
Which is exactly why we need to reform elections to get ranked voting enacted. Ranked voting allows you to vote who you really want while still voting for the lesser evil if who you want doesn't win.
Isn't the goal to DEFINE one group based on their behavior?
No, the goal is to figure out how to correct our political system. Assigning blame will do nothing to fix our present situation.
that doesn't mean anything. some people act from morality, some from greed, etc. They have nothing in common,
And now you understand why defining them as a single group is a foolish effort.
certainly nothing that could be labelled 'best'. That's a gross oversimplification.
Not at all, they are doing what they believe is in their best interest. What their interest is varies wildly. Also, I already wrote that it's irrational to blame any one group, so yeah, it's an oversimplification.
People are doing very bad things that they clearly couldn't do without the complicity of many others of similar sort.
Which is why we need to fix the system to prevent such complicit individuals from being in power.
How can you solve any problem that is caused by a man if you cannot say who that man is?
And that is why it's such a large challenge, because it's no one person or group.
Are you totally resigned to have things go this way for your children or at least for the future generations?
Not at all! I think very small changes in how we pick politicians can have seismic effects. Have you not read the reasons why things are why they are? Changing any of those things will make it easier to enact the others and eventually we'll have real reform. You need to look at the big picture.
The way we are building processors (primarily lithography) is old, tired and reaching it's limits. What we need now is to focus on figuring out how to make small machines that can work cooperatively to build new things, including copies of themselves. It's been known for quite some time that future of computing is in massive distributed systems, so why aren't we applying the same concepts to manufacturing processors?
Slashdot Mirror
Like Discord for Linux, Skype for Linux Beta is essentially Skype for Web wrapped in Electron, which is a special-purpose web browser using Blink (the engine of Chrome) specialized for one site at a time.
While some frameworks can use CSS for styling or even HTML for layout they only partially use of javascript for event handling, I think the lesson here should be clear: never go full javascript.
Voters usually like a good leader who can speak well and who has good ideas.
That's true but they prefer charismatic figures that validate their biases.
The problem here is that Intel has no legal basis to threaten anyone over x86, so instead they are just blowing smoke to scare away investors using the press. Both side know that Intel's x86 patents have expired and AMD owns all the patents for x86_64 which is also known by it's original name AMD64. Since Intel is now powerless, they are reverting back to their old anti-competitive habits.
I'm just wondering if much of electorate that placed these people in power have gazed into the abyss of populism and seen that darkness ahead. I certainly hope so because there is still time to set things right in the world.
Normal peoples basic rights are still protected.
The problem is that you working under the presumption of guilt. If they get it wrong then normal people have been stripped of their rights.
Jan Sloot had some ideas on how to compress things and despite hyping it up, he had gotten nowhere close to anything functional. With all the hype he generated, he had a deal lined up for the technology but he didn't have the goods. The stress of the impending revelation of his fraud caused him to suffer cardiac arrhythmia and he died. The source code was never found because it never existed.
Is anyone else really bored by all the stories about this huckster company? Give it time, they will implode.
People are meeting, funding and supporting terrorists. That can be stopped.
That's fine, just don't sacrifice people's basic rights to do that because it's shitty trade.
Speaking after Saturday's London attack, Mrs May said "enough is enough" and that "things need to change" in the terror fight.
The death and injury of people is tragic but destroying the rights of your own people is just idiotic. Terrorists aren't killing millions, they killed maybe 100 in the last decade. More people die from drowning than terrorist attacks!
If he wanted to do something disruptive then he would have made a phone with a removable battery or one that actually lasts for a week. What we really have here is just another Android phone.
You do realise he was using a metaphor, right?
What I realize is that it's very crude. I rather frustrate people using such vulgarities than indulge them.
Just proves democrats aren't that smart
Trump keeps making a fool of himself. Why would anyone opposed to his agenda want to muzzle him?
It seems more likely that this question was not framed in a "political game of war" context. Only the most partisan individuals consider everything using an "us versus them" mentality.
When everyone's only goal is to "win," we all lose.
I feel like I'm the only person in the world that doesn't get a stiffy when looking at a Tesla.
If you want a car that will give you an erection when you look at it then you need therapy, not a new car.
I want something that looks nice, drives well and I can smile smugly to myself when I pass the pumps.
Have you considered a Prius?
Comments not very Christian
Christian? ACs barely even pass for human.
They have been particularly good at exposing how petty, dimwitted, bigoted and foolish he is, not just as a president but as a person. I think it's important for people to understand just kind of a person they vote for, even if it's after the fact.
That not true! Me brain go worksing still! Drinking good! ;)
Have you tried contacting and asking such an organization this very question?
.. on the issue of why women developers are hard to recruit and keep in the business of tech.
Without any statistical information to as the rate at which and reason why both men and women have chosen to leave their positions at a multitude of "tech" businesses, the very premise of this article is based on a judgement without merit. Literally speaking, it's prejudice, specifically sexist.
It's just a joke. The only x86 chips I've used in the past decade have been AMD chips. I was disappointed when they added an equivalent of the IME and have begun seeking other avenues for processing.
With a day-side temperature peaking at 4,600 Kelvin (more than 7,800 degrees Fahrenheit)
I think they finally found the homeworld of AMD processors. ;)
Cable TV deserves to fail. Those assholes have overcharged everyone for decades because they had a monopoly on access to content. In another century, every last one of them would be tarred, feathered and run out of town only to die slowly from infection. I have no sympathy for people who gleefully exploit the general population.
1) The truth ALWAYS matters
2) There is an active investigation into possible collusion with Russia.
3) Trump could be impeached.
They're the 0.1% who receive representation by congress when everyone else does not.
Absolutely! This is why we need political campaign finance reform. When you level the playing field with elections, you are more likely to get someone that is more representative of the people.
That they can be ousted or resisted by picking one of their political parties is laughable. They decide who wins the primaries, then we get to pick from their candidate pool
We only need to limit the reach of their influence. It's like cutting the strings on a marionette doll, once cut there is a loss of control.
The choice between D and R isn't freedom or representation, but a box to contain us.
Which is exactly why we need to reform elections to get ranked voting enacted. Ranked voting allows you to vote who you really want while still voting for the lesser evil if who you want doesn't win.
Isn't the goal to DEFINE one group based on their behavior?
No, the goal is to figure out how to correct our political system. Assigning blame will do nothing to fix our present situation.
that doesn't mean anything. some people act from morality, some from greed, etc. They have nothing in common,
And now you understand why defining them as a single group is a foolish effort.
certainly nothing that could be labelled 'best'. That's a gross oversimplification.
Not at all, they are doing what they believe is in their best interest. What their interest is varies wildly. Also, I already wrote that it's irrational to blame any one group, so yeah, it's an oversimplification.
People are doing very bad things that they clearly couldn't do without the complicity of many others of similar sort.
Which is why we need to fix the system to prevent such complicit individuals from being in power.
How can you solve any problem that is caused by a man if you cannot say who that man is?
And that is why it's such a large challenge, because it's no one person or group.
Are you totally resigned to have things go this way for your children or at least for the future generations?
Not at all! I think very small changes in how we pick politicians can have seismic effects. Have you not read the reasons why things are why they are? Changing any of those things will make it easier to enact the others and eventually we'll have real reform. You need to look at the big picture.
The way we are building processors (primarily lithography) is old, tired and reaching it's limits. What we need now is to focus on figuring out how to make small machines that can work cooperatively to build new things, including copies of themselves. It's been known for quite some time that future of computing is in massive distributed systems, so why aren't we applying the same concepts to manufacturing processors?