WikiLeaks is a reasonable point, but torrents really do not fall under free speech. You may well disagree with laws concerning copyright, but that doesn't change the fact that they exist.
My comment was a stupid joke -- because it's the pause, and not the tap, that determines wether you tap a . or a -
Morse code is easier with beeps though.
You do realize that the authors of the letter of concern mention that, and point out that while the effects of this radiation is fairly well understood, the backscatter x-ray is not, because it only affects the skin, not the whole body.
You don't have to stink, you can just wear pants coated in something sticky, preferably something that really irritates skin. And have some spare pants in your carry-on bag:)
It doesn't nessescarily stop anything. But Apple is not allowed (does not have a license to) distribute VLC unless they follow the GPL, which amongst other things says that Apple must make the source available.
Salmon farms use way more fish as fodder than they produce - and they spill tons of antibiotics into the oceans. Let's hope we can either come up with some better ways tofish, or in the alternative some better ways to farm.
While this is most certainly true, software like Haystack can prevent iranian intelligence from discovering "new" dissidents through surveillance of known ones.
When there are wind farms in enough places around the globe, we can be sure they will generate a certain minimum at all times - this can probably be modeled based on wind patterns, so that use of other sources (hydro, hydrogen reservoirs, nuclear) can be planned and adjusted accordingly.
Because your paging algorithm will be much less tested, used and bugfixed than any OS paging algorithm. And the memory you allocated might be swapped out by the OS anyway.
TFA writes about how the norwegian newspaper VG replaced 10 squid machines with 3 varnish machines and got much better performance. That switch was done 5 or so years ago, before varnish was first released as open source.
He's not writing about beating squid _now_.
It doesn't really matter how stupid these users were, or how little privacy they had to begin with. Google seems to systematically collect personally identifiable information, and export it to a jurisdiction with weaker privacy laws.
The export part is crucial. As I understand it, that's what makes this a crime.
You're confusing possible with legal. It should be obvious to anyone that breaking an encryption in order to see other peoples data, no matter how weak that encryption might be, is criminal.
It's not catching the data that is the problem. It's storing it and exporting it to a country with weaker privacy laws than Germany. If any of the data is found to be private, then this is specifically forbidden.
Actually, a more interesting way of fining publically traded companies might be to disallow and/or heavily tax payouts to shareholders for the next few years.
That would create a _real_ incentive to follow the law.
Slashdot Mirror
UK police and security services are fully aware where Assange is (he's not hiding from them), but are not arresting him because of errors in the Interpol warrant. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1334899/Scotland-Yard-arrest-wanted-WikiLeaks-boss-today.html
LTE is not 4G. Here in Norway, one provider is in some trouble for falsely advertising their upcoming LTE offering as 4G.
Nokia explains that LTE is not 4G here.
WikiLeaks is a reasonable point, but torrents really do not fall under free speech. You may well disagree with laws concerning copyright, but that doesn't change the fact that they exist.
My comment was a stupid joke -- because it's the pause, and not the tap, that determines wether you tap a . or a -
Morse code is easier with beeps though.
How do you perform this "long tap"? :)
You do realize that the authors of the letter of concern mention that, and point out that while the effects of this radiation is fairly well understood, the backscatter x-ray is not, because it only affects the skin, not the whole body.
The word that's unclear to me in the 4th amendment is 'unreasonable', not 'effects'.
Nah, but you probably have the right to buy up land, build your own sidewalk, and drive your rocket-propelled car on that.
You don't have to stink, you can just wear pants coated in something sticky, preferably something that really irritates skin. And have some spare pants in your carry-on bag :)
It doesn't nessescarily stop anything. But Apple is not allowed (does not have a license to) distribute VLC unless they follow the GPL, which amongst other things says that Apple must make the source available.
APPLE is the distributor; THEY have to offer the source. And impose no further restrictions.
They don't offer the source, and they do impose further restrictions on distribution. Hence, TFA.
Salmon farms use way more fish as fodder than they produce - and they spill tons of antibiotics into the oceans. Let's hope we can either come up with some better ways tofish, or in the alternative some better ways to farm.
First, that's an exaggeration. Second, the icelandic banks followed the regulations put forth by the EU/EEC.
While this is most certainly true, software like Haystack can prevent iranian intelligence from discovering "new" dissidents through surveillance of known ones.
When there are wind farms in enough places around the globe, we can be sure they will generate a certain minimum at all times - this can probably be modeled based on wind patterns, so that use of other sources (hydro, hydrogen reservoirs, nuclear) can be planned and adjusted accordingly.
Because your paging algorithm will be much less tested, used and bugfixed than any OS paging algorithm. And the memory you allocated might be swapped out by the OS anyway.
TFA writes about how the norwegian newspaper VG replaced 10 squid machines with 3 varnish machines and got much better performance. That switch was done 5 or so years ago, before varnish was first released as open source. He's not writing about beating squid _now_.
Open the link in a new tab, or copy-paste the adress linked to, in order to circumvent the evil javascript :)
Pretty stupid that Apple doesn't have a "view anyway" button on the warning message, though.
Well, yeah, not that many sites have a moderation system like slashdot's :P
http://www.google.com/pacman
It doesn't really matter how stupid these users were, or how little privacy they had to begin with. Google seems to systematically collect personally identifiable information, and export it to a jurisdiction with weaker privacy laws.
The export part is crucial. As I understand it, that's what makes this a crime.
You're confusing possible with legal. It should be obvious to anyone that breaking an encryption in order to see other peoples data, no matter how weak that encryption might be, is criminal.
It's not catching the data that is the problem. It's storing it and exporting it to a country with weaker privacy laws than Germany. If any of the data is found to be private, then this is specifically forbidden.
Actually, a more interesting way of fining publically traded companies might be to disallow and/or heavily tax payouts to shareholders for the next few years.
That would create a _real_ incentive to follow the law.
Unless you want to help debug and/or develop, I doubt anyone expects or even wants you to.