Slashdot Mirror


User: elvum

elvum's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
358
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 358

  1. Re:Timing on Thousands and Thousands of Hours of PVR TV · · Score: 1

    There were three cards in the box.

  2. Re:How it might work on Thousands and Thousands of Hours of PVR TV · · Score: 1
    • it's not a product, it's a project
    • the data-capture is performed by three Hauppauge Nova-T PCI cards. Each records a single DVB-T multiplex, which is enough to record all the TV channels broadcast terrestrially in a single location in the UK.
    • the quality recorded is exactly the same as the quality broadcast
    • your comment that "VHS quality shouldn't be too hard to achieve" by using a low-quality ADC is, I'm afraid, entirely incorrect.
  3. Re:5 channels on Thousands and Thousands of Hours of PVR TV · · Score: 1

    What about S4C?

  4. Re:I promise.. on Thousands and Thousands of Hours of PVR TV · · Score: 1

    That's because it's not a company and they're not selling a product. It's a project, like MythTV.

  5. Re:I wish there was more hand-holding regarding Di on BBC Open Source launched · · Score: 1

    If you want to contribute to Dirac as a programmer but don't want to spend several months studying maths, there's plenty of work to be done outside the field of optimising the codec - interfacing it to every video-related open-source project under the sun for example. There're already Dirac patches for transcode, ffmpeg and mplayer, but that's just the tip of the iceberg...

  6. Re:Concerns on Television on your Phone · · Score: 1

    Stop fretting about UTMS capacity and go and read about DVB-H. :-)

  7. Re:Sorry, but that is just plain wrong. on BBC Launches APIs · · Score: 1

    Why-o-why did the BBC have to pay millions, for example, to get a sports show (Saturday night footie) when the same footie was already on TV on a commercial station.

    Because of a small but significant number of licence-fee payers who are interested in football and would feel hard-done-by if the BBC didn't cover their sport.

  8. Re:Not true geeks... on Fewer Computer Science Majors · · Score: 1

    $a is "perl syntax" :-)

    In BASIC, $ indicates a string variable. Integers are represented "bare".

    So,

    10 LET A = 2
    20 IF A = 2 THEN PRINT "2"

    in BBC BASIC, AFAIK, at least... ;-)

  9. Re:Use? on China to Crack Supercomputer Top Ten List · · Score: 1

    Hello? Last time I checked, the UK, France, Russia, Pakistan, India and I think China itself all had nukes. Not to mention the Israelis (probably). There's no question of the US being the "sole keeper" of such weapons, even if it wanted to be.

  10. Re:It seems only fair to me on Mirror.ac.uk to Scale Back Operations · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your university is on the American side of the Atlantic, isn't it?

  11. Re:Email address on Mirror.ac.uk to Scale Back Operations · · Score: 1

    RTFA: The new service will be greatly reduced compared to the current mirror.ac.uk.

  12. Email address on Mirror.ac.uk to Scale Back Operations · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you want to register your disapproval, try their "general enquiries" email address: info@jisc.ac.uk.

  13. Re:Update shows iTMS needs more selection on Apple Releases Major iTunes Update · · Score: 1

    And I'm telling you that you could get a waveform that looked totally different and yet sounded exactly the same. In that case the "actual waveform" would *not* be "more informative than just listening".

  14. Re:Update shows iTMS needs more selection on Apple Releases Major iTunes Update · · Score: 1

    It's not a very useful test - the human ear is absolutely crap at detecting absolute phase information, so lossy encoders often just discard it. This can lead to waveforms that look totally different and yet are completely indistinguishable to the human ear.

  15. Re:Specs Data on Sapphire: A Liquid That Won't Get Things Wet · · Score: 1

    RTFA

  16. Re:isn't this duplicate work on Can You Spare A Few Trillion Cycles? · · Score: 3, Informative

    Everyone works on the whole picture at once, but simulates different randomly-emitted photons. All you need is a different random seed for each client, which is trivial to manage.

  17. Condor on Can You Spare A Few Trillion Cycles? · · Score: 1

    Have a look at the Condor Project - I think they're already on it :-)

  18. Re:Good call.. on NASA Tests X-43A · · Score: 1

    Suppose you want a 2nd live feed... How are you going to transmit the data out of the plane?

    Given that they were receiving remote telemetry data all through the flight (until the test plane went over the horizon - I switched off as they were talking about a P3 Orion that should have caught the reat), I suspect that they've solved that problem.
  19. In the interview on Working Around Bad Luck on the Resume? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shrug and laugh about it. Attitude counts for a lot.

  20. Re:Warning: Joke on Crack the Pepsi iTunes Promo Code · · Score: 5, Funny

    At last we can finally put to rest the national stereotype of the Germans as humourless.

  21. Warning: Joke on Crack the Pepsi iTunes Promo Code · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think someone should start a business selling CDs full of random numbers.

  22. Re:whoa on Indian Techies Answer About 'Onshore Insourcing' · · Score: 1

    Tony Blair is *not* a socialist - he and the "New Labour" movement he founded are broadly centrist with a few right-wing leanings, notably on the issues of asylum, civil rights and privatisation.

  23. Re:Cheaper prices on ATI PCI-Express Devices Revealed · · Score: 1

    How is "p2p" any different from PCI bus-mastering? You can already get PCI cards to talk directly to one another.

  24. Re:They shouldn't draw attention to themselves on Verisign's SiteFinder - An Engineer's View · · Score: 1

    In the UK right now they're running a massive poster advertising campaign claiming that their burgers are "100% pure beef".

  25. Re:In comparison to...? on Folded Newtonian Telescope · · Score: 0

    Dude, go and complain to the author. I stand by my point, which was that the original poster should have read the article before asking his question.