Slashdot Mirror


Crack the Pepsi iTunes Promo Code

An anonymous reader writes "Someone posted a technique to find a winner in the iTunes Pepsi promo giveaway." Next step: a Pepsi/iTMS winning number generator!

594 comments

  1. On Apple's behalf... by NewWaveNet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oops, there went that debt free memo! ;)

    1. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AFAIK Pepsi buys the tunes from Apple for the standard $0.99... so it's Pepsi's problem, not Apples.

    2. Re:On Apple's behalf... by ryanw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, you still have to "open" the bottle to win. Pepsi/Apple is still ahead on this one.

    3. Re:On Apple's behalf... by NewWaveNet · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, you still have to "open" the bottle to win. Pepsi/Apple is still ahead on this one.
      They're not ahead because they whole point of this promotion is to get people to sometimes become an expense when they generate revenue for the company in hopes of that customer repeating thier decision in lack of a possible iTunes reward. When people simply abuse the game by only selecting bottles with an iTunes code, the purpose has been defeated. Also, if this were to get large mainstream press, the public will loose the, "hey...maybe I can win," attitude which, once again, defeats the purpose.
    4. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but supposedly Apple is paying more than $.99 to license each track.

      iTunes Music Store is a loss leader for selling iPods.

    5. Re:On Apple's behalf... by letdownjournals · · Score: 5, Insightful

      AFAIK Pepsi buys the tunes from Apple for the standard $0.99... so it's Pepsi's problem, not Apples.

      I have no idea how the profits break down... But I seriously doubt that Pepsi is paying full price per song. I also have the feeling the record labels are getting paid all or near their usual fees. So I guess it boils down to who you want to screw over-- Pepsi and Apple by scamming the contest, or the RIAA by going back to Kazaa.

      But the real question is, don't most of us have enough music yet? How many times have you listened to 99% of those 20, 40, even 100gb+ songs on your hard drive?

    6. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the public will loose the, "hey...maybe I can win," attitude

      Yeah, it'd be much better if the public tighted that attitude.

    7. Re:On Apple's behalf... by J-Hawker · · Score: 1

      It's not a big deal, really. They are just giving a away fewer bottles during the promotion. I'm sure Pepsi is paying.

    8. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So I guess it boils down to who you want to screw over

      So I'm screwing somebody over by just tilting the bottle at a 25 degree angle?

      What's going to happen next - is Jack Valenti going to go on record that it is every person's duty to buy up all the bottles in the shop?

    9. Re:On Apple's behalf... by DjMd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dude, thats why you Recycle them...
      Sound familar you maybe have read it here.

      This way you don't have to use 'suck'y Itunes, and you still get to stick it to the RIAA.

      --
      DJMD - The fourth man - Planetary
    10. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      You mean people will loose the "I won't win" attitude to the public, which will cause the public to LOSE the "hey...maybe I can win" attitude.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    11. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 0, Informative
      I've never heard that allegation. Most information points to apple getting around $0.35 per song to cover bandwidth, expenses and a small profit.

      Most of the other online stores sell for $0.99 a track ($0.88 for Walmart), so it's smarter to assume they pay less than that for licensing than to assume a slashdot AC has some kind of insight.

    12. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but what ever you do, don't drink the soda! they have laces the sweet juice with a mind altering drug that makes you into a Mac fanatic.

    13. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical bull crap. check your facts, moron.

    14. Re:On Apple's behalf... by lavaface · · Score: 5, Funny
      Let's be realistic. You are not scamming the contest by looking under the cap (without opening the bottle.) I wonder what percentage of bottles made are winners. 1 in 5? Who knows. When you consider that many people don't look at the cap or won't bother to claim (Pepsi expects only 1/3 to make claims) the few who know how to "cheat" will make nary a dent in the outcome.

      Pepsi's ad budget is ~$250 million a year.

      Also, consider they war with Coca-Cola over "turf" in school districts across the country. Money for nothing for cash-strapped schools.

      Also remember we're talking about flavored sugar water. Who's scamming whom?

    15. Re:On Apple's behalf... by atrader42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "How many times have you listened to 99% of those 20, 40, even 100gb+ songs on your hard drive?"

      Well, since that 100 gb song is 71 days long, I don't get too many opportunities to listen to the whole thing. I do, however, enjoy sections of it.

    16. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, at some point they will all be bought.

    17. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Cylix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Oh I did this with coke contests a long time back.

      I sifted through the gas stations 1:6 winners til I bought all my friends a free coke. we were kids and half the fun was just biking to the gas station. As long as you get some minimumwage employee... no one seems to mind.

      Then I discovered the real fun in contests. At the time you could call in an 800 number and punch in your numbers to see if you won a real prize. So, I read the rules and nothing said I oculdn't enter as many times as I liked.

      At that point I setup all my little memory dial buttons to enter the sequences for entering. I even played around with it and found certain numbers gave a spanish version.

      After school I would sit down and enter a few hundred times a day and even my brother got in on the fun. This went on for a month or so.

      In the end we only won a game gear... which was quite expensive and only 500 game gears were available nation wide.

      Since then I have never seen coke do such a contest or at least allow the kind of entry I was performing.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    18. Re:On Apple's behalf... by tomasito · · Score: 1

      I worked for a gas station once and would go in the cooler and sift out the free 20oz Mountain Dew bottles to the back shelf. I did use the tilt method but I found that a nice bright backlight helped a lot too.

    19. Re:On Apple's behalf... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 2, Informative

      They said the 1 in 3 caps were a winner. You can of course never know if this is true. You could buy a huge amount of bottles and do some statistics calculations and get a pretty good estimate that way, but I really don't think it's that important. They're giving away songs for free!

      --
      Martin
    20. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      100gb=71days?

      100 000 000Kb @ 128Kb/s = 781250/60/60/24 = 9.04days

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    21. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Mr.+Droopy+Drawers · · Score: 1

      Is that why every Pepsi I buy is flat?

      --

      To Copy from One is Plagiarism; To Copy from Many is Research.

    22. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only person you're screwing over is the people who are buying Pepsi who are not doing this stupid trick. Either way, Pepsi sells more product.

    23. Re:On Apple's behalf... by andcal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also remember we're talking about flavored sugar water. Who's scamming whom?

      Yeah, but it also contains caffeine, the melange of the real world. No, I am not trying to claim that there is only one source of caffeine in the world. The reason compare it to the Spice of Arrakis is because, like how melange allows the guild pilots of Dune to fold space and travel between the stars, caffeine makes certain, critical work in the real world possible, which would otherwise not be done. Imagine all the code that would have never been written, were it not for caffeine!

      --
      --something witty
    24. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did anyone else notice that the parent site of TuneRecycler.com seems to advocate vandalism of merchandise in retail stores?

      We all may agree with their stand on the RIAA, but I for one cannot support their position of 'retail-terrorist'. To add insult to injury, they 'borrow' a new camera from Wal-Mart to photograph their little escapade, fully intending to return it after they're done! Reprehensible.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    25. Re:On Apple's behalf... by baddawg65 · · Score: 1

      Tunerecycling is no better than reselling old CDs at the record store.

    26. Re:On Apple's behalf... by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      I can't say I really care about the fight Downhill Battle is making, but... "vandalism"?

      I looked it up, and vandalism is the "willful or malicious destruction of public or private property." I don't see how those stickers are really destroying anything. RIAA's business practices do exploit the artist, and the stickers are making people aware of that. So what? It's not like they're stealing CDs or breaking them. They're putting stickers on cellophane wrappers that are going to be thrown away. BFD.

      What's sad is that they're wasting so much of their own time to do it.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    27. Re:On Apple's behalf... by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Well, caffeine has been shown to improve scores on IQ tests, but I don't know that a slight bump in intelligence would be enough to transform someone into a Mac fanatic.

      You'd really need some more powerful smart drugs to accomplish that reliably :-P

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    28. Re:On Apple's behalf... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      yeah but they also get coke fans to pay for pepsi more often

    29. Re:On Apple's behalf... by tealwarrior · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I did something similar but it wasn't quite the hack that yours was. When glass bottles we're still used the openers in convienent stores dropped the bottle caps in an attached bucket. I would go to several convient stores and collect the caps from the buckets. My best take was $50 from Pepsi's 21 game (I found an odd numbered cap!) but it was worth it just for the free soda.

      --
      In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, in practice there is.
    30. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then I guess you wouldn't mind me spray-painting a slogan on the side of your car, huh? I haven't destroyed anything, and you're going to throw the car away eventually anyhow, right?

      From Merriam-Webster:

      vandalism: [The] willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property [Emphasis mine]
      defacement: to mar the external appearance of
      The stickers constitute defacement, in my book. They diminish the value of the CD to the retailer - the message is repugnant, they're large, ugly, and cover the artwork, making customers less likely to purchase a CD (the whole point of their little vendetta).

      Protest outside the store legally; start a direct-mailing campaign; skywrite for all I care, but don't break the law to make your point!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    31. Re:On Apple's behalf... by dhamsaic · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not going to throw the car away eventually, and you technically have destroyed something that's very important to many car owners.

      Your analogy is pretty fucking retarded, since when you buy a car, you're buying to get a car. When you buy a CD, you're not buying to get the cellophane. Many times stores put price stickers on the cellophane, thus covering the artwork and making customers less likely to purchase the CD, right?

      Besides, "deface" implies destruction of the surface or disfigurement. Placing an easily removed sticker could hardly be considered "defacement" by a reasonable person. For paint to be removed from a car, actual physical damage is done (though in a controlled manner).

      I'm glad they constitute "defacement" in your book; fortunately, you don't make the rules. I would be hard pressed to believe that anyone is going to see the sticker and think "Well, gee, since ths is blocking the artwork, I'm not going to buy the CD". Your claims are ridiculous.

      Lastly, I'm skeptical that putting stickers on CDs at a record store is actually illegal. I think the most that could happen in this situation is that Wal Mart security asks the offenders to leave the store.

      Just because someone does something you find disagreeable doesn't mean it's illegal or even wrong, and stretching the definition of an ugly word to make it fit with what is actually happening makes your argument look pretty weak.

      But I'll tell you what; you come spray paint my car (which I find very disagreeable) and I'll put a sticker on a still-sealed CD of yours (which you consider vandalism). We'll both call the police. Tell me if they come take a report for your case.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    32. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, as America was not founded on breaking any sort of laws.

    33. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is true. I believe it might cost Pepsi a nickel to make
      sugar water. And I do agree that for all the effort of flipping a bottle over and jotting down the number..you
      might as well just hit the share nets and grab songs.

      Although have you all noticed that there is some seriously miss labled bands and songs out there...not to mention some pretty cheezy rips.

      Ultimately after all is said and done...the RIAA is history..they know it, as Internet music will be an ad to draw you into the "live" show. That is what they really fear...because if all the music that is on records is had by public for free...and people do pay cash to go to a live music show ( which by the way is how most musicians make their money..especially on the t-shirts you buy!!) then the Record Execs can't live in million dollar homes and drive the newest cars anymore!! Right !

      Share that music and let's get some great bands to NEVER sign a record deal. ( I imagine it's pretty hard when they wave a 100k$ check in your face ??)

      finkyD

    34. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      As I thought I made abundantly clear, the value of the CD to the retailer is reduced, not necessarily the value to the customer.

      My argument regarding the sticker blocking the artwork was not that the end consumer couldn't remove it, it was that the sticker made the CD artwork less attractive and therefore less likely to attract a browsing buyer.

      I guarantee that if caught placing stickers on a store's merchandise the store could elect to press charges under several existing statutes - trespassing, solicitation, and defacing private property for starters.

      I wish you hadn't chosen to stoop to name-calling and profanity - it makes you look childish and diminishes any valid points you might have had.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    35. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Then I guess you wouldn't mind me spray-painting a slogan on the side of your car, huh?

      Sticker on plastic wrapping VS permanent paint on actual product.
      Riiiight...they're the same...

      The stores allready put a ton of stickers all over the damn things. Price, lies about pricing policies, bragging about store policies, special offers, etc. Most people won't even notice an extra sticker.

      and I repeat: A removable sticker on a product's wrapping is NOT the same as permanent paint on the actual product. Not even close.

      Aside from that, you might have some kind of point about that group's behaviour...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    36. Re:On Apple's behalf... by lysurgon · · Score: 1

      The stickers constitute defacement, in my book. They diminish the value of the CD to the retailer - the message is repugnant, they're large, ugly, and cover the artwork, making customers less likely to purchase a CD (the whole point of their little vendetta).

      Wow; god forbid anyone might do anything to reduce the likelyhood of someone buying a crappy CD.

      The stickers go outside the shrink wrap. They bring pertinant information to the attention of consumers. There's no reduction in actual value of the product. The only thing being interfered with is an (exploitative) sales process.

    37. Re:On Apple's behalf... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish you hadn't chosen to stoop to name-calling and profanity

      I didn't see any name-calling, he said your argument was fucking retarded, not you.

  2. And Apple just got back in the black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Welcome back to the world of debt.

    1. Re:And Apple just got back in the black by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most likely, no.

      The majority of Pepsi drinkers probably don't care about the promotion.

      Those who do will win. Those who don't care won't win and won't care that they didn't win.

      The tunes go to the people who want them, and more or less everyone is happy.

      I'd say this would hold true if anywhere under 10% of Pepsi drinkers wanted the iTunes songs. Once you get past that, you wind up having massive inventories of losing bottles nobody wants and things turn ugly fast.

      But if that's the case, it's Pepsi that loses, not Apple. Apple has no liability for Pepsi's inventory problems or lack of same.

      D

    2. Re:And Apple just got back in the black by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say this would hold true if anywhere under 10% of Pepsi drinkers wanted the iTunes songs. Once you get past that, you wind up having massive inventories of losing bottles nobody wants and things turn ugly fast.

      But if that's the case, it's Pepsi that loses, not Apple. Apple has no liability for Pepsi's inventory problems or lack of same.


      Well it's not like pepsi sales are gonna get lower than before the promotion after all the winning caps are gone. I'm at the very least there will be a moderate rise in consumption.. wether it's because of the promotion or growing worldwide addiction who knows.

    3. Re: Re:And Apple just got back in the black by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You might want to look at this another way: They may not mind the cheating at all.

      What they want to do is convert Coca-Cola addicts (like me) to Pepsi addicts. This is a back-handed bribe for me to switch from Coke to Pepsi for a month. The economics actually aren't bad, since as well as shifting my brand, they want me to buy more expensive single bottles at over $1 each, as opposed to my usual 6 and 12 packs at under $ 0.50 each.

      The actual sugar water component of a soda costs around $ 0.10. The wholesale value of a song on iTunes is probably around $ 0.50. If they have about a 100% markup at retail, the $1.20 pepsi bottle is giving them $0.60, so they are roughly breaking even on my sodas which are a guaranteed win.

      What they're counting on, of course, is that I switch to Pepsi and continue drinking it after the promotion. This is surely not impossible, as long as I decide I like the taste better. If they wind up doing that, they may not care that I'm only picking winning bottles, and they might have even made it deliberately trivial to cheat. They won't tell us that; it ruins the fun. But they may well have done it. Of course that's also why there's a 200 song limit for each email address. They'll let me have $100 wholesale, no matter how I get it.

      Interesting, no?

      D

    4. Re: Re:And Apple just got back in the black by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      What they want to do is convert Coca-Cola addicts (like me) to Pepsi addicts. This is a back-handed bribe for me to switch from Coke to Pepsi for a month.

      iTunes codes are also in the Big Gulp cups (but not the other sizes) at 7-Eleven. They're rolled into the lip of the cup...cut the lip and unroll it to see if you have a winner. Fill it with Coke (or Diet Coke) and you have a chance at getting free music without putting up with that Pepsi swill. Free music and a chance to fsck over Pepsi...what could be better? :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  3. Oh, come on! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny
    The big secret: "tip the bottle and see if you can see 'again' under the cap." Sheer genius.

    No, really--this would never have occurred to me.

    I mean, really--the tipping of the bottle I could probably get to, but then to look through the clear plastic--inspired, my friend, inspired. And differentiating between 'again' and a random string of numbers? This guy has to be into hardcore pattern recognition. NSA, are you seeing this?

    Yeah.

    There exist elegant solutions to truly vexing problems that, once discovered, are striking in their simplicity. There also exist people who try to pass off the painfully obvious as an elegant solution to a truly vexing problem.

    A free iTunes code to the person who can guess which category this falls into...

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Oh, come on! by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Then there's the fact that I don't really like Pepsi to begin with. When somebody offers me a Pepsi, I tend to decline in favor of tap water. Therefore the value of 20 oz. of Pepsi to me is $0.00.

      A bottle usually costs between $0.99 and $1.49, depending on where you buy it, so even if I'm a "winner" every time, I'm pretty much breaking even compared to just giving iTMS my credit card number and downloading whatever I like.

      Hey, Steve... Is this what it has come to? You sell sugar water to children for a living now?

      (I keed, I keed!)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Oh, come on! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Funny

      A free iTunes code to the person who can guess which category this falls into...

      [holy grail]
      Category 1... no, 2! Aaarrrrrrrgghhhhhh
      [/holy grail]

    3. Re:Oh, come on! by ForestGrump · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yea, yet another reason to get a job working for the school cafetria...
      so you can sit in the back tipping bottles while getting paid for it.

      -grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:Oh, come on! by ttldkns · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mod this as funny but its _actually_ the "secret"

      *sigh*

      --
      How many computers are too many?
    5. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't believe so many people consider this to be a new concept.

      My friends and I had been doing this since at least the late 80s when plastic bottles and contests really started. We got a lot of free doctor pepper this way:

      1: walk to back of 7-11
      2: tilt all bottles in fridge until "WINNER" is seen through plastic...
      3: buy bottle
      4: Profit!

      No ??? required. This technique is not new.

      For the people that still say one is spending $.99 through $1.50 for a bottle--if you are buying the bottle for the song, you are stupid.

      If you are buying the bottle to get the contents and a song, then you utilizing the technique effectively.

      We weren't looking for winning bottles of doctor pepper so we could look at them. We were buying them so that the next bottle was free. I am sure the people that are following the same concept are planning to download a song while drinking their pepsi.

    6. Re:Oh, come on! by John+Harrison · · Score: 5, Funny
      Good thing they don't have Crystal Pepsi anymore or this would be even easier!

      As far as the idea of a generator, I hope that Apple was smart enough to use strong crypto in their generator, such that you would have to know the key to come up with a winning entry.

      I don't see how subverting this promotion is good for anyone in the long term. Do you want more promotions like this in the future? Do you want the store to last? I guess the temptation of a free 99 cent song is too much for some.

    7. Re:Oh, come on! by netringer · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hey, Steve... Is this what it has come to? You sell sugar water to children for a living now?
      I never thought of that.
      Do ya think this Pepsi/iTunes promo could be Scully's revenge! *gasp*
      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    8. Re:Oh, come on! by t1nman33 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pepsi and Apple Computer would like to remind you that attempting to circumvent our patented "CapTron" technology is a violation of the DMCA, and will be prosecuted as such.

      --
      --- Where's my car, and why are these grass stains on my pants?
    9. Re:Oh, come on! by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Oh, rather give me commentators plain,
      Who with no deep researches vex the brain;
      Who from the dark and doubtful love to run,
      And hold their glimmering tapers to the sun.

    10. Re:Oh, come on! by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow,

      I was thinking it is a good thing they don't have Crystal Pepsi because it is so awfully disgusting.

      to each their own I guess.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    11. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is as 1337 as Apple users get.

      Apple - so 2004 won't be like 1337.

    12. Re:Oh, come on! by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just sugar water, caffeinated sugar water! That's why it continues to sell - our kids are addicted.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
    13. Re:Oh, come on! by jyoull · · Score: 5, Informative

      Steve's children aren't allowed to drink soda or watch television, if this story is accurate. http://212.100.234.54/content/6/35259.html

    14. Re:Oh, come on! by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The big secret: "tip the bottle and see if you can see 'again' under the cap." Sheer genius.
      It's a nice secret, but even this was defeated. Some pop-bottle promotions have been using an opaque plastic, meaning that you couldn't tell even when you tilt the bottle to look at the inside of the cap.

      It's the simplest of tricks to prevent such knowledge, but suprisingly effecive. The only thing that I think could allow you to view the secret within the cap is to shine a bright light through it, and I'm not sure you'd want to do that with your remaining eye.

    15. Re:Oh, come on! by BillX · · Score: 1

      Hey now, that's offensive to us true morons out here who would never know that you could see the underside of a cap by looking at it from underneath. How insensitive!

      In all seriousness though, let's see... painfully obvious process, described in entirely too much detail...anyone smell a frivolous patent coming? If I were PepsiCo, I'd be at the patent office right now making sure contest-cheats were forced to resort to substantially more inconvenient methods such as shining a very bright light, or clever thermal imaging.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    16. Re:Oh, come on! by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      falls into...

      Indeed.

    17. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Download all your music for free (Kazaa, etc.)
      2. Drink water instead of Pepsi.
      3. Profit!!!

    18. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There also exist people who try to pass off the painfully obvious as an elegant solution to a truly vexing problem. ... and then patent it, which is what this guy should obviously do.

    19. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      isn't that CrapTon?

    20. Re:Oh, come on! by utlemming · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! You have it wrong. The true, died in the wool copyright infringer will use Kazaa-lite!

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    21. Re:Oh, come on! by Baikala · · Score: 1

      "How insensitive!"?? You must be new here, that would be: "You insensitive clod!"

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    22. Re:Oh, come on! by Baikala · · Score: 1

      I know, your number is lower than mine, but I could'n help it! It was perfect oportunity to perpetuate some /. subculture.

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    23. Re:Oh, come on! by psyki · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously this marketing campaign is not targeted towards you. Believe it or not, not all advertising gimmicks are designed to be desirable by everybody in the whole world. Pepsi and Apple are clearly targeting people who already like Pepsi products and would find a free song a nice prize in addition to their drink of choice.

      Anyone who knows anything about iTMS would know that songs are only $.99 and would realize the futility of purchasing a more expensive product just for the less expensive free gift. There's also something to be said for generating hype over a product in general, like we are all doing right this second by reading this post.

      So you don't like Pepsi, then don't buy one. If you want songs from iTMS then go directly to the source. Get over yourself.

    24. Re:Oh, come on! by pavon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, where is the foot? This article totally deserves the foot.

    25. Re:Oh, come on! by mesach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have yet to see a Pepsi/Apple iTMS bottle yet in the store, I was thinking that they are delaying the distribution of the bottles to further cut down on the # of submissions.

      I had a friend that worked at a gas station, and whenever there was a promotion, he would look as he stocked and put all the winners aside, whenever we came in he would just point to where they were and we would turn in the free coke/pepsi cap to him and keep the drink. I always thought that something like this was the reason they went to the promotions like basketball where you get a team, and it worked out somehow that way, Why is it always Basketball Crap? I hate sports, gimme something I can use, not something to make me watch a game and see if I might win if I STILL have the cap laying around.

      --
      moo.
    26. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does the DMCA know about this?

    27. Re:Oh, come on! by Tower · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought Crystal Pepsi was the only Pepsi worth drinking (I don't really care for colas, and it sure didn't taste like a cola). It was fine for what it was, but it sure didn't taste like Pepsi.

      Of course, some people don't like Dew, so there really isn't any accounting for taste ;-)

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    28. Re:Oh, come on! by corian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some pop-bottle promotions have been using an opaque plastic, meaning that you couldn't tell even when you tilt the bottle to look at the inside of the cap.

      or they could just put a little bit more soda into the bottle.

    29. Re:Oh, come on! by veg_all · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only it were sugar water.
      In actuality, it's high fructose corn syrup water, which is much, much worse.

      [Anti ADM / farm-subsidies rant ommited for the sake of staying on topic]

      Oh, I can't help myself. They're spending tax dollars to subsidize giant agracorps to grow too much corn that they have to turn into sweetners and corn-fed beef to rot your teeth and give you mad cow disease!

      ahem.....

      --
      grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
    30. Re:Oh, come on! by Uart · · Score: 1

      actually, the way I view it, I am getting a song on iTunes, plus my soda at a huge discount, only $0.35!!!

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    31. Re:Oh, come on! by psyki · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point.

    32. Re:Oh, come on! by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      So when they grow older, they will have healthier teeth and healthier opinions.

    33. Re:Oh, come on! by rixstep · · Score: 1

      Interesting parallel, seen in Pirates of Silicon Valley: the Big Brother face of the GATES when Jobs has returned and rescued Apple by making that deal with MS.

      Good businessmen don't get picky. At least they know when to bury the hatchet. Business is, after all, business.

    34. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Luckily for Pepsi, it only costs $0.14 (or some amazingly low amount) to make, distribute and market. So the profit margin is still there.

    35. Re:Oh, come on! by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny

      And from what I understand, Lisa isn't allowed on the internet either.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    36. Re:Oh, come on! by BillX · · Score: 1

      I have an All-Your-Base-derived signature, that's enough slashdot subculture for me :-) If I wanted to score /. points, I'd make some kind of half-assed Soviet Russia comment (In Soviet Russia, YOU make BEVERAGE tipsy! I.S.R., bottle cap look down on YOU! etc.), and link it to Goatse..ahem... goat.cexx.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    37. Re:Oh, come on! by Zagadka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't get mad cow disease from corn-fed beef. You get it from cow-fed beef. In particular, a cow becomes infected only by ingesting brain or nerve tissue from another infected cow.

      The rest of your point is valid, however.

    38. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you smoking?

      Crystal Pepsi was the only good Pepsi ever. It tasted like Coke. And it was a good thing, too, since at that time, Coke was trying to pass New Coke off as the real thing. Coke figured out their mistake, but Pepsi could've had a trojan horse if they would've kept making Crystal Pepsi. Coke alienates customers... Pepsi attracts them and keeps them... Coke loses... Pepsi wins.

      Too bad, it could've been big.

    39. Re:Oh, come on! by OneFix · · Score: 1

      A good bit of the bottles are being mixed in with normal (blue capped) bottles in vending machines. They hafta find a way to get rid of them, so my guess is they're giving the Pepsi vendors cases of winners and they are told to put the winners in 1/3 times...

    40. Re:Oh, come on! by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Gee -- I tipped the bottle and all I saw was some cryptic message: "Copyright, SCO 2004"

    41. Re:Oh, come on! by euxneks · · Score: 1

      I got montezeuma's revenge from drinking too many bottles of pepsi once, but I've never heard of this Scully's revenge?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    42. Re:Oh, come on! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the thing is, just because you saw it on TV, doesn't make it true.

      "rescued" Apple? How do you "rescue" a company that has over $4 billion in the bank, by buying $500 million in non-voting stock?

      Microsoft was buying their way out of the Quicktime lawsuit, and Apple was agreeing that they would promote MS Office and IE and take a big pile of money to settle the lawsuit.

      There was no rescue. The TV was wrong.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    43. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not only allowed, but I even like to read ./!

    44. Re:Oh, come on! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      $150 million, IIRC

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    45. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gatoraide ran a 'cap' promotion a couple years ago.. Unfortunatly for them, one of thier products is clear. You could read the entire cap just by tilting the bottle almost upside down. I couldn't have been the only one who noticed it, since the only clear bottles around were please try again. I think I only ever found one winner. And a free bottle of gatoraide wasnt motivation enough for me.
      To my credit, I didnt publish this as super secret, since I figured it was common sense.

      -J

    46. Re:Oh, come on! by evil+superstar · · Score: 0

      Even better: I found out you can also tilt your head by the same angle in the opposite direction!

    47. Re:Oh, come on! by dwightk · · Score: 1

      oh oh... the second one?

      you know where to send the code :)

      --
      Like anyone can even know that
    48. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      given the sequence, you would have to drink water lite.

      Mmmm, pure H2 and no 0oooooo

    49. Re:Oh, come on! by fafaforza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And when they get all hopped up on caffeine and start acting hyper, we hit them with Prozac. Big business wins twice. It's genious!

    50. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, fructose is better for you than sucrose. Also, the subsidies have more to do with ethanol than sweetners or animal feed. Meet from corn-fed animals tastes fantastic. If you don't believe me, order a steak in southern Kansas or Oklahoma, then fly to central Iowa, Minnesota or Wisconsin and have one there. Corn makes meat taste better.

    51. Re:Oh, come on! by sdcharle · · Score: 1

      Who else hates those contests in general? I just want to drink a Coke, and I get finding out I'm a loser thrown in. I don't need that. The ones with the codes are worse, I start worrying I may be throwing the cap away that would put my kids through college. Beer companies don't do that kind of crap to their customers. Drink more beer.

    52. Re:Oh, come on! by elwinc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may also get it from sheep fed beef. The theory is that the BSE that first appeared in Britain was caused by mixing scrapie infected sheep parts into the cattle feed.

      --
      --- Often in error; never in doubt!
    53. Re:Oh, come on! by PantsWearer · · Score: 1
      Pepsi and Apple are clearly targeting people who already like Pepsi products and would find a free song a nice prize in addition to their drink of choice.

      Actually, this would make no sense at all. The people that currently like Pepsi products would buy Pepsi in any case, free song or not.

      This campaign is targeted at people who don't normally buy Pepsi for one reason or another or who are planning on switching to something else, thus increasing Pepsi's sales by giving them a reason to buy Pepsi.

      Personally, I only buy Pepsi over Coke when it's on sale and then I usually buy Mt. Dew or Dr. Pepper since they go on sale along with the rest of Pepsi's products.

      --
      Be glad life is unfair, otherwise we'd deserve all this.
    54. Re:Oh, come on! by GSloop · · Score: 1

      Kinda sucks for the cows though.

      They have to keep them on serious antibiotics so their organs down fall apart, shut down and kill the cow.

      Real healthy.

      Cows were made to eat GRASS - not grains - certianly not corn.

      Perhaps it does taste better, I don't actually know. But it's not likely to be a healthy cow, a happy cow, or a humane meal.

      (Never mind that the real reason they use corn, is that they couldn't supply grass with enough calorie density to do what they do with huge, no vast, feedlots.

      Anyway - corn fed beef are sick sick cows. If you like the taste of sick cows, well, I guess you go to it.

      (You're probably one of those people who doesn't see a problem feeding calves blood too, right?)

      Cheers,
      Greg

    55. Re:Oh, come on! by Eravau · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Any idea how much the wholesale cost is to your regional grocery or convenience store chain that buys them by the thousands? (Having never worked in such a capacity I haven't the faintest). Just wondering how much margin Pepsi has in the long run.

    56. Re:Oh, come on! by the_riaa · · Score: 1

      Dr Pepper is not a Pepsi or a Coke product (though it is sometimes bottled and distributed by either Coke or Pepsi bottlers). And contrary to popular belief, neither is 7-Up.
      The Dr. Pepper / Seven Up company is the #3 soft drink company in the US. They have DP, 7Up, Canada Dry, Sunkist, and A&W.

    57. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it is vaguely interesting that the Pepsi Poison Peddlers chose to inform the buyer of the cap's winning status right away. When I heard of this promotion I assumed they'd simple include a number with each cap as a "possible winner", and the person would have to connect to iTunes to check it out. When you think about it this is how most such promotions work - they want to get you in the door, so to speak. That would also have the effect of reducing the number of actual claimants.

      Oh well. I still drink filtered tap water and download music the old-fashioned way. Call me a luddite.

    58. Re:Oh, come on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So you don't like Pepsi, then don't buy one.
      You should apply for a patent on that, because I'm absolutely positive nobody has ever thought of it before. You, sir, are clearly the greatest genius in all of history.
  4. a crack? hmm. by tedtimmons · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a crack? I mean, if you count the cap'n crunch as a crack, sure. But I don't consider tilting a bottle of soda a crack. It seems more like social engineering.

    1. Re:a crack? hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure.
      except there is nothing social about it.

    2. Re:a crack? hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Draper, the fellow who wrote the webpage you linked to, is a known chickenhawk.

      All those stories people crapflood this site with involving lurking 'guru' boy molesters who hang out at LUG meetings? They're inspired by this fellow.

    3. Re:a crack? hmm. by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems more like social engineering.

      If your only friend is a bottle of Pepsi.

      KFG

    4. Re:a crack? hmm. by Cloud+9 · · Score: 5, Funny
      If your only friend is a bottle of Pepsi

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    5. Re:a crack? hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In what way is tipping a bottle up "social"?

      Social engineering is fooling people. This is a hardware hack.

      I think the word you're grasping for is "lame".

    6. Re:a crack? hmm. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      He must be new here.

  5. Slashdotted Already! by gambit3 · · Score: 4, Funny


    Darn!

    Now I'll have to play fairly and by the rules!

    That just ain't fair!

  6. Re:It's already done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    :%s/geneator/generator
  7. Great teach people that open source == cheaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and criminals.

    They are nice enough to give away songs. Unlike most things talked on slashdot, this is actually stealing.

    1. Re:Great teach people that open source == cheaters by freeze128 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's only stealing if you steal the pepsi.

    2. Re:Great teach people that open source == cheaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because most "Open Source" clowns are only concerned about free-as-in-beer. And all of their machines dual-boot a pirated copy of Windows. It's not suprising in the least.

      Free Software fans are different.

    3. Re:Great teach people that open source == cheaters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free as in Pepsi?

    4. Re:Great teach people that open source == cheaters by gellenburg · · Score: 3, Informative
      They are nice enough to give away songs.

      Now stop right here.

      Anyone who thinks that the Pepsi/ iTMS 100,000,000 song give-away is charity needs some remediation.

      Apple & Pepsi aren't being nice to anyone.

      The whole iTMS sweepstakes, just like all sweepstakes, are to entice you ... the consumer ... to drink more Pepsi (or purchase/ consume a product). It just so happens that you're enticement here is a 33% chance of a free song.

  8. Secret Agent Crack by qw(name) · · Score: 5, Funny


    As long as the "crack" can be placed in a secret decoder ring I'll be happy.

    1. Re:Secret Agent Crack by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny

      free iTunes code:

      8UYM0R30V4L71N3

      (don't mod this offtopic if you don't get the joke. read the code slowly)

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Secret Agent Crack by JM+Apocalypse · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know why, but I was just at the store and had this incredibly strange urge for some sort of chocolate drink.

      --

      - - - - - - -
      Orppf urp mf y.ppcxn. yflcbi otcnnov C am yflcbi yr n.apb Ekrpatv (Dvorak -> Qwerty)
    3. Re:Secret Agent Crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A crummy commercial?!

    4. Re:Secret Agent Crack by Jediman1138 · · Score: 0

      Actually the quote was "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine."....god, i have no life...

      --

      nothing.can.stop.me.now

    5. Re:Secret Agent Crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reading slowly and not getting it, HELP ME!!!

    6. Re:Secret Agent Crack by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Red herring. It's just l33t.

    7. Re:Secret Agent Crack by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      cat > dv2qw
      #!/usr/bin/perl -w
      $_=join("",@ARGV);
      tr/\'\,\.pyfgcrlaoeuidhtn\ ;qjkxbm\"\[insert_less_t han_here]\[insert_greater-than_here]PYFGCRLAOEUIDH TN\:QJKXBM/qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmQWERTYUIOPASD FGHJKLZXCVBNM/;
      print "$_\n";
      exit 0;

      note the transpose (tr/*) is all on one line, even though /. splits it to two lines

      --
      - Sig
    8. Re:Secret Agent Crack by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, but that wouldn't have looked as good.

      835UR370DR1NKY0UR0V4L71N3 is too obvious. DRINKYOUR is practicaly sitting there yelling at you.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    9. Re:Secret Agent Crack by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      buy more OVALTINE?

      u r teh sukc at teh 1337zp33k!

      --
      Free as in mason.
    10. Re:Secret Agent Crack by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      11:15 Restate my assumptions:

      1. Mathematics is the language of nature.
      2. Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers.
      3. If you graph these numbers, patterns emerge. Therefore: There are patterns everywhere in nature.
      4. Ovomaltine is spelled differently for those funny Britons and USians.

      --
      Free as in mason.
    11. Re:Secret Agent Crack by Myopic · · Score: 1

      "don't forget to drink your ovaltine"

    12. Re:Secret Agent Crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *snicker*
      I wish I had mod points right now.

  9. And the winner is... by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    The American Dental Association, for the sudden increase in work coming their way. A Mr Orin Scrivello, D.D.S. will be presented with the award - a special enamel yellow I-Pod - at the next 'Fillings Across America' convention.

    1. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at it this way, with all those cavities the battery actually might be user accessible.

    2. Re:And the winner is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Enamel is not yellow, it's white. Its all the crap that you eat/drink that might make it yellow.


      -Anonymous Dental Student

  10. That didn't take long by strech · · Score: 1

    And neither did the slashdotting.
    Anyone have a mirror of the article?
    And is someone going end up in the same boat as Greg Dean?

    Luckily, this sort of thing happens with a number of contests. Pepsi will just fix it in future bottles (if any) and go on; not going to affect mp3s-as-commerce at all, really.

    1. Re:That didn't take long by satterth · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Dude, just tip the bottle a little bit and look under the cap. If you see random numbers/letters you got a winner. If you see 'again' then try again.

      I can't believe Pepsi let this one through.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:That didn't take long by cabingirl · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here is the site where I originally read of the technique. (Not a mirror of the posted site)

      I tested the "crack" at work when I bought a 20 oz Diet Pepsi at the cafeteria, and accurately predicted that the bottle I had purchased was a winner. However, it has to look fishy to others when you're standing there holding the bottle at a funny angle, so I've refrained from actually trying to capitalize on it.

      --
      I could kill you, sure, but I could only make you cry with these words
  11. Awesome! by furiousgeorge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool - a guaranteed way to pick a winner!

    Now i'm off to buy many $1.20 bottles of sugar water so I get get a free $0.99 song!!!! I can't lose!

    oh wait............

    Never underestimate the stupidity of people in large numbers.

    1. Re:Awesome! by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      Ah, but if you were going to buy the Pepsi anyways...

      But yea, I can see people buying Pepsis for no reason other than the code; as in, keep the cap, toss the Pepsi.

    2. Re:Awesome! by kev0153 · · Score: 1

      If you were going to buy the Pepsi anyway, why not pick a winner.

    3. Re:Awesome! by AdamBLang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you're a regular Pepsi drinker, you're buying your normal beverage of choice at your normal price and getting a song to boot.

      If you're a regular iTunes Music Store user, you're spending 21 on a Pepsi.

      If you're an iTMS user and a Pepsi drinker, this whole thing is saving you 99 off your regular Pepsi/iTMS purchases.

      If you're a cola drinker but not a Pepsi drinker, buying a Coke is really costing you $1.20 + 99 (99 for lost opportunity cost).

      You really can't lose!

      Never underestimate the stupidity of people in small numbers.

    4. Re:Awesome! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 0, Redundant

      keep the cap, toss the Pepsi.

      It would be easier and cheeper to just buy the song online instead, although paying $1 per song isn't good for Apple because of credit card transaction costs.

    5. Re:Awesome! by standsolid · · Score: 1

      emp discout for me: US$0.70
      <br><br>
      looks like i'll be looking through pepsi trays at work tonight! shibby.

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
    6. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouldn't you spread the opportunity cost over the "1 in x number of bottles is a winner" vs. assuming every one is a winner?

    7. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 20 ounce Pepsi bottle costs me $0.85 so I'm saving money. And since for ever Pepsi I drink I'm not drinking a Mountain Dew it's healthier for me too.

      Of course I don't need this technique. Since I am currenly four winners for four purchases I figure I just have the magic touch.

    8. Re:Awesome! by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the stupidity of people in large numbers.

      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    9. Re:Awesome! by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      It would be easier and cheeper to just buy the song online instead

      Isn't that what I said? Do you have reading comprehension issues or something?

    10. Re:Awesome! by damiam · · Score: 1

      In many places you can buy bottles for less than 99 cents. For example, the local university snack shop sells 20 oz. bottles for 78 cents.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    11. Re:Awesome! by l-ascorbic · · Score: 4, Funny

      And if you think that drinking any cola is only slightly preferable to sucking the sweat from Steve Ballmer's jock strap, then you'be just wasted 21c on sink corrosive.

    12. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do you people buy your liquids by weight and not volume?

    13. Re:Awesome! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Maybe you meant to say that, but you didn't.

    14. Re:Awesome! by SoLoatWork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless you don't drink cola....

      Never underestimate the stupidity of people looking for snappy comebacks.

    15. Re:Awesome! by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      why do you people buy your liquids by weight and not volume?

      You want to pay for the bubbles?

    16. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..... and twenty fluid ounces are usually called a pint.

    17. Re:Awesome! by AdamBLang · · Score: 1

      Touche

    18. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>shouldn't you spread the opportunity cost over
      >>the "1 in x number of bottles is a winner" vs.
      >>assuming every one is a winner?

      Correct. The odds are 1:3, so instead you're really paying $3.60 for a $0.99 song.

      But the thrust of the article is being able to beat the odds and guarantee a win.

    19. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well no, but don't the bubbles weigh anyway?

    20. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ounce in the Imperial system is both a weight and a volume. I know, its confusing - don't blame me, I certainly am not responsinble for this :)

    21. Re:Awesome! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      If your a water drinking winmx/kazaa user then ???

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    22. Re:Awesome! by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they weigh significantly less than their volume, when taken with respect to their contribution to the total weight/volume of the bottle.

    23. Re:Awesome! by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      If you're a cola drinker but not a Pepsi drinker, buying a Coke is really costing you $1.20 + 99 (99 for lost opportunity cost).

      This should be "if you're a cola drinker, but not a Pepsie driner, and you're an iTMS user". Otherwise, you might be a coke user whose valuation of the free song he could get is less than 99 cents.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    24. Re:Awesome! by Aero+Leviathan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. 20 fl oz (fluid ounces) is a measurement of volume, not weight. It is commonly (yet incorrectly) abbreviated to simply 'ounces' which is a unit of weight. One fluid ounce is the volume which an amount of pure water weighing one ounce takes up.

      2. 20 fluid ounces = 1.25 pints = 591 mL (okay, I have a bottle next to me, I'm cheating)

      --
      ~ Aero
    25. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      poor best buy worker, huh?

    26. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, those bubbles are CO2. That's heavier than air, in case you didn't realise. So you're still paying for the bubbles, although you may be getting a small discount.

    27. Re:Awesome! by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the stupidity of people in small numbers? Are you including yourself? Or is this a joke? If so, you should make it a little more clear.

      "If you're a regular iTunes Music Store user, you're spending 21 c on a pepsi"

      "If you're a cola drinker but not a Pepsi drinker, buying a Coke is really costing you $1.20 + 99"

      So in other words, a pepsi now costs 21c and a coke costs $2.19, a difference of $1.98; how does this work?

      You can't have it both ways; your standard state either has to be "getting a free song with your drink" or "not getting a free song with your drink." Changing midstream simply doesn't work.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    28. Re:Awesome! by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit Aero Leviathan:

      2. 20 fluid ounces = 1.25 pints = 591 mL (okay, I have a bottle next to me, I'm cheating)

      That's a U.S. pint. An Imperial pint is, indeed, 20 UK fluid ounces. See Wikipedia, s.v. ``Pint''. This is an important distinction because where beer is customarily served in pints, they are pints of twenty ounces.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    29. Re:Awesome! by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Which is what he said, the total cost of the pepsi + song is $1.20, the total cost of a coke + song is $1.20 + .99. , thus the cost of a pepsi and a song is $.99 (song) + .21(pepsi), while the coke is $.99 (song) + $1.20 (coke).

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    30. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      make your own whisky..

      it's free, and all those numbers just don't seem to matter any more...

    31. Re:Awesome! by AdamBLang · · Score: 1

      It's microeconomics 101. Opportunity costs, indifference curves, etc, etc.

    32. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But a coke and a smile is still just $1.20 (or $1.08 here)

    33. Re:Awesome! by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's just from the huge quantity of sugar water in my stomach, but I gagged when I read that comment.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    34. Re:Awesome! by wankerbollock · · Score: 1

      >>If you're a cola drinker but not a Pepsi drinker, buying a Coke is really costing you $1.20 + 99 (99 for lost opportunity cost).

      Not always true.

      Just go to your local 7-11, pick up a specially marked iTunes BigGulp and fill it with any beverage you like. Total cost $1.09

    35. Re:Awesome! by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      And if you think that drinking any cola is only slightly preferable to sucking the sweat from Steve Ballmer's jock strap, then you'be just wasted 21c on sink corrosive.

      Then buy Sierra Mist, Mountain Dew, or Slice.
      Now if your problem is with carbonated beverages instead of colas, you're S.O.L.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    36. Re:Awesome! by Squidgee · · Score: 1
      But yea, I can see people buying Pepsis for no reason other than the code; as in, keep the cap, toss the Pepsi.

      As in, I was agreeing with the parent post's asseration that "Now i'm off to buy many $1.20 bottles of sugar water so I get get a free $0.99 song!!!! I can't lose!"

      Moron.

    37. Re:Awesome! by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so you meant one thing but said something else. nothing to fuss about.

    38. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very poor, yes.

  12. Usually, I think crackers are scum, but... by Trillan · · Score: 1, Funny

    If this is about the "crack" I read yesterday (article is completely /.ed to hell) of tipping the bottle to see what's under the cap, all I can say is hoorah! for creative thinking.

    When you set up something this stupid, you deserve to be caught with your pants down.

  13. All I wanted was an iTune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Just one iTune, and Pepsi wouldn't give it to me!

    1. Re:All I wanted was an iTune by StuWho · · Score: 1

      All you got was this lousy ICavity

      --
      "If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments." Earl Wilson
    2. Re:All I wanted was an iTune by smkndrkn · · Score: 1
      NO you're on drugs!

      OK here are the lyrics in question for those of you who don't know ST.

      I was in my room and I was just like staring at the wall thinking about
      everything but then again I was thinking about nothing
      And then my mom came in and I didn't even know she was there she called my
      name and I didn't even hear it, and then she started screaming MIKE! MIKE!
      And I go:
      What, what's the matter
      And she goes:
      What's the matter with you?
      I go:
      There's nothing-wrong mom.
      And she goes:
      Don't tell me that, you're on drugs!
      And I go:
      No mom I'm not on drugs I'm okay, I was just thinking you know, why don't
      you get me a pepsi.
      And she goes:
      NO you're on drugs!
      I go:
      Mom I'm okay, I'm just thinking.
      She goes:
      No you're not thinking, you're on drugs! Normal people don't act that way!
      I go:
      Mom just give me a Pepsi please
      All I want is a Pepsi, and she wouldn't give it to me
      All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi, and she wouldn't give it to me.
      Just a Pepsi.
      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    3. Re:All I wanted was an iTune by J-Hawker · · Score: 1

      I'm not crazy!

  14. Re:Boredom by Lysol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The music's only awful if you make it that way. I've downloaded/bought some decent stuff off iTunes so far. Much better deal than going into some mega-cd store...

  15. Hard to imagine... by NeoTheOne · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldnt hardcore geeks drink so much caffine (ie pepsi) that they wouldnt need the generator?

    1. Re:Hard to imagine... by IchBinDasWalross · · Score: 0

      No. Hardcore geeks drink Bawls, Jolt, Redbull, or they do what I do: take NoDoz.

      --
      Mod "Overrated" instead of replying "I disagree with you," you coward.
  16. Before Long by HappyCitizen · · Score: 0, Redundant

    People will be selling generated pepsi codes on ebay. This will probably make iTunes need to cancel the service. If that happens, then I'm mad at the hacker. Either way I am, because it will simply help pirating IMO.

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
    1. Re:Before Long by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      But then ebay will yank the auctions, because the numbers do not belong to you, they belong to Pepsi.

      hear that, all your numbers are belong to Pepsi. don't try any funny stuff, like making up your own numbers, or "adding" or "dividing". They'll get you... get you, I say!

    2. Re:Before Long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you didn't RTFA or RTFComments that all say the "crack" is to tilt the bottle!

      Neiter did the moderators.

    3. Re:Before Long by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Not true. Sell the CAPS idiots :) I sold about 4,000 caps on eBay during the first Pepsi "Stuff" promo. It was veyr easy, as only Pepsi vendors were allowed at my school, and i was working the recycling program.... Therefore, i got paid $7/hour to twist off bottle caps to sell on ebay :) BTW - 4k caps = $350. Each cap was at least 100 points, and CDs were like 20k points - the people who bought my auction had at LEAST 400,000 points. Considering the Harrier jet they advertised as a joke - and got sued over - was like 36M points, that was enough to buy a full wardrobe of KoRn shirts and baggy pants, and all their CDs to boot :)

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    4. Re:Before Long by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      Somebody set up us the song!

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  17. wtf? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's pretty amusing but did the editors actually read this story before posting it? "Next step: a Pepsi/iTMS winning number generator!" WTF? Stuff that matters indeed.

    Of course before I criticize them too much don't think I'm not going to try this the next time I go to the store. I don't drink soda (evil substance) but I can resell it to friends that don't use iTMS for the purchase price and pocket the songs ;)

    1) Buy evil sugar water that's bad for you with winning code.
    2) Resell said sugar water to friends who don't use iTMS.
    3) Download songs legally while simultaneously screwing Pepsi and RIAA.
    4) ???
    5) Profit!

    (I'm not trolling for karma. Feel free to mod this funny to avoid giving me any overrated if you disagree).

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:wtf? by Squidgee · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And that screws Pepsi...how? They still make the money off of your purchase, after all.

    2. Re:wtf? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      And that screws Pepsi...how? They still make the money off of your purchase, after all.

      My ingenious theory was that Pepsi is paying RIAA something for these downloads so it cuts into Pepsi's bottom line. After all they are figuring that a large portion of them will get tossed into the trash and not used. The other part of my ingenious theory was that RIAA probably gave them to Pepsi at some sort of discount -- so it hurts RIAA's bottom line a little bit too.

      I'll admit the impact is small. But it brings a smile to my face nonetheless.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:wtf? by Highlander · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3) Download songs legally while simultaneously screwing Pepsi and RIAA.

      If by "screwing" you mean "buying their products" then yes, you are correct. You may be reselling the drinks so there is no cost to you, but there is still profit to the parties providing the goods.

      H

    4. Re:wtf? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      If by "screwing" you mean "buying their products" then yes, you are correct. You may be reselling the drinks so there is no cost to you, but there is still profit to the parties providing the goods.

      But their profit margin is smaller then if some hick who doesn't own a computer buys the bottle and tosses the cap away. Plus my friends are more likely to recycle the bottle after they are done with it then he is (he'd probably use it for target practice or something) anyway so everybody wins -- including Mother Earth ;)

      Don't try to understand my insanity -- just agree with me and know the power!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    5. Re:wtf? by discogravy · · Score: 5, Funny
      That's pretty amusing but did the editors actually read this story before posting it?

      you're new, right?

    6. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to leave your parent's basement.

    7. Re:wtf? by Silent+Bob+On+Couch · · Score: 1

      I don't drink soda

      What is this soda you speak of? Everyone knows what it's called pop. Sheesh... *runs for cover*

    8. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends...

      Pepsi is reportedly paying the normal 99 cents per track to Apple. And since a bottle only costs about that, they're definitely not getting 99 cents per bottle.

      If you take a random bottle off the shelf, your odds of getting a winner are 1 in 3. However Pepsi only expects 10% of people to claim their iTunes download. Which means only 1 in 30 bottles will be redeemed for a free iTunes download.

      If a significant number of people do this, people who care about iTunes downloads will have a 1 in 1 chance of getting a winner, leaving the loser bottles behind. Now the percentage of bottles that are being redeemed for a free iTunes download goes up from 3% potentially to something like 6% or possible more, costing Pepsi more than they anticipated.

      I doubt too many people will be reading the caps before purchase, but if they did, it could cost Pepsi a couple hundred thousand dollars or so, potentially.

      I'm not saying it will, just that it could. Also I'm just saying that this technique will definitely cost them SOME money.

    9. Re:wtf? by Shakrai · · Score: 1
      you're new, right?

      Naw, just naive ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:wtf? by aiyo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The "you must be new to /." jokes are old. Especially when used in reference to not reading an article. Please stop it. On the other hand I've been around for a while to know that one year from now I will see this joke modded up again. In Soviet Russia, old jokes laugh at you!

    11. Re:wtf? by Chalex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he is. His uid is almost exactly 1/10 of mine... I remember when CowboyNeal didn't drink Pepsi, and look at him now...

    12. Re:wtf? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      While screwing the RIAA? Every winning cap that gets redeemed is probably another 30-odd cents in the pocket of the RIAA. If you want to screw the RIAA you should go find winning bottles, buy them, and BURN the winning caps. Oh, and drinking the soda is optional.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One year from now? How about next week?

    14. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be new around here

  18. Wow, mods are retarded. by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

    The link is to a random character generator written in Java. Mods, do you think random characters will make an iTunes code?

    1. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suspect not, but I'm sure it could produce music of the same quality as most of the stuff produced today.

    2. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by FooGoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eventually...yes...but maybe not before the contest ends.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yes, using the Million monkeys theory of productions.

      Its a joke boy, don't ya get it? Yer built too low. The fast ones go right over your head!

    4. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by yerfatma · · Score: 3, Funny

      "You got a hole in your glove: I keep pitching 'em and you keep missing 'em."

    5. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not, but it might not take too much more than that...consider:

      There has to be some piece of information that users can type in that will uniquely identify their winning bottle. That piece of information has to fit on the underside of the cap. It also has to be capable of representing 100 million different winning codes. Even if it's alphanumeric, it shouldn't take long to brute force a winning code.

    6. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Cobblepop · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And given enough time, it could produce Shakespeare.

    7. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Drawkcab · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 10 alphanumeric characters in these codes, so around 36^10 different possible codes. If there are 100 million winning numbers, then about 1 in 30 million of them is going to be a winner. I would say that it would take quite a long time to brute force a 1 in 30 million code, considering that you have to wait for the website to respond to each request. Its fair to say that the contest would be over by the time you succeeded, and the time and bandwidth you wasted would be worth more than the 99 cents worth of free music (which you could just as easily download for free).

    8. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      MI>And given enough time, it could produce Shakespeare.

      The beauty is, given enough time it WILL produce Shakespere, DeCSS, and even Duke Nukem Forever.

      The odds of it doing so this week are pretty slim

    9. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if we could see a few codes we could most likely start making educated guesses of how the "codes" are built up and greatly improve the odds of 1/30.000.000 to something with a lot better hit ratio.

    10. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by tyndyll · · Score: 1

      i don't know - random bips and bobs are what seems to smake music theses days.. now when I was a lad....

      --
      Morale seems good, considering, although high spirits are just no substitute for eight hundred rounds a minute
    11. Re:Wow, mods are retarded. by KarmaPolice · · Score: 1

      If there are 100 million winning numbers, then about 1 in 30 million of them is going to be a winner.

      And you can be pretty sure that the codes aren't generated from some algorithm. That would be too risky with the amount of data available...the codes are definitely generated by random, so the /. article statement about a code-generator is pretty naive.

  19. I'm not sure I can afford to win... by erick99 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The way my kids drink soda, I could go broke "saving" money with free songs this way. We'll stick to the 2 Litre bottles when they are on sale and they can listen to their favorite music on the radio. Though, it would be fun to win just once or twice....

    Happy Trails!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by internewt · · Score: 1
      Though, it would be fun to win just once or twice....

      And the dots mean???... That the free songs give your kids a couple of goes on ITMS. This is exactly what the promotion is for, to get new punters in because the pigopolists know just how much pressure kids have over the buying power of parents.

      A lot of parents will have seen the "P2P is illegal"[1] propaganda from the **AA, and when they see their kid happily using iTunes they'll feel much happier than when the kid's using kazaa.

      [1] P2P obviously isn't illegal, but Harry Homeowner will believe anything when it comes from a good big company like Pepsi /sarcasm

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    2. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've gotten to the point where I like the store-brand sodas better anyway. They're less sweet and also considerably less expensive. Big K cola (from Kroeger) rulez.

      --
      ---
    3. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by jpmkm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It always annoyed the hell out of me that you could get a two liter of pop for the same price as a 20 oz. I don't drink pop though so it doesn't really affect me.

    4. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you trying to get your kids fat? feed them water, not possibly one of the worst things they can put in their mouths....

    5. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It always annoyed the hell out of me that you could get a two liter of pop for the same price as a 20 oz. I don't drink pop though so it doesn't really affect me.
      Yeah? Well, it annoys the hell out of the rest of the world when you refer to soda as "pop".

      Second place: referring to a pizza as a "pie".
    6. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this "soda" or "pop" you are refering to?

      Oh... you mean a coke?! (notice the tiny C)

    7. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by jpmkm · · Score: 1

      Well I can't say anything for the rest of the world, but more people in the US say pop than soda.

    8. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The 20 ounce soda has probably been refrigerated. The 2 liter hasn't.

    9. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just say "soft drink" and bypass the damn problem.

    10. Re:I'm not sure I can afford to win... by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      You're both wrong. In Texas, it's always a coke, even if it is a pepsi. Not that any self respecting person would drink that tainted Pepsi crap. Coca Cola is ok. RC rocks... don;t forgety our peanuts.

  20. Here are the images by jonknee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hey guys, someone submitted when we were already at the top of our load. So while the host works things out, here are the images used in the story.

    1. Re:Here are the images by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I'm flabbergasted at the realization that someone got out a protractor to measure the fact that you have to hold the bottle at a 25 degree angle.

      Well, actually, I'm not sure if that's worse then the "look here" arrow or not.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  21. And the next step after that... by genmanath · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1) Submit the results from a iTunes number generator batch 2) Pepsi cancels the contest 3) ??? 4) Profit? I for one welcome our new...aww, forget it... I don't even own an iPod...or a Mac. grumble.

    --
    G. M. Manath

    Go not to the Elves for counsel, for they will say both 'Yes' and 'No.'

  22. Mirror by Alcimedes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since it's already slashdotted i'll paraphrase.

    Tip the damn bottle.

    If it constains the word "song" you won.

    Buy that bottle.

    The end.

    1. Re:Mirror by elflet · · Score: 4, Informative

      Easier still: "try again" caps have 3 lines of printing, centered. Winning caps have 4 lines and fill pretty much the whole space. You don't even have to make out the words, just avoid the caps with a fair bit of whitespace at the edges.

    2. Re:Mirror by wankledot · · Score: 1
      Not totally true. I have had winning caps with three lines like this:

      GS43I PKL49 ONE FREE SONG

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    3. Re:mirror by calyptos · · Score: 1

      btw i don't support this, its not fair to pepsi. i'm just trying to help someone with bandwidth.

      --
      http://illhostit.com/ - Webhosting
    4. Re:Mirror by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      That looks like one line to me, but what I really wanted to point out was that your code appears to be invalid.

      But you have started me on my search, only 36^10-2 = 3656158440062974 left to try. I went to the store and used this method to grab a winner, that is why I already know two of the possibilities. I also showed the clerk, who is a friend, and a few other random people how to spot the winners. Guess we will be buying guaranteed winners for a while...

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  23. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, people who lack the capacity to detect sarcasm ad absurdium is a truly vexing problem. What part of that post made you think the guy was actually singing the praises of an individual he considers an intellectual giant?

  24. KeyGen Released!! by pantycrickets · · Score: 5, Funny

    ORiON PROUDLY PRESENTS
    iTunes Sweepstakes (c) Apple
    SUPPLIER ...: Team ORiON
    CRACKER ....: Team ORiON
    PACKAGER ...: Team ORiON
    RELEASED ...: 02.18.04
    TYPE .......: Keygen
    DISKS ......: XX/01
    /sarcasm

    1. Re:KeyGen Released!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the promo code is the first 5 digits of your M$ Windows key

    2. Re:KeyGen Released!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol that made me chuckle. I know there are many warezers on /. but I never ran into one. Also thanks to ORiON for the great apps.

    3. Re:KeyGen Released!! by Black+Jack+Hyde · · Score: 1

      You forgot the shout-outs in file_id.diz.

    4. Re:KeyGen Released!! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      SUPPLIER ...: Team ORiON
      CRACKER ....: Team ORiON
      PACKAGER ...: PepsiCo

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  25. itunes under wine? by bear_phillips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Has anyone got itunes to run under wine?

    --
    http://www.windmeadow.com/
    1. Re:itunes under wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's too hard to print the entire winning number on the bottom of a cork.

    2. Re:itunes under wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol. and i rarely lol.

    3. Re:itunes under wine? by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      And the number would be totally screwed when you opened the bottle.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  26. A bit of info by read-only · · Score: 5, Informative
    The server linked to was slashdotted, so I found this via Google. Not all that impressive...

    No, I don't have algorithm to generate winning numbers. (I would have to assume that they are randomly generated anyways) But, after my 5th winning pepsi top in a row, I'm pretty confident in my ability to pick a winner by examining the bottle. Assuming that the intial bottles really are only 1 in 3 winners and are evenly distributed (which isn't a given) then 5 in a row is good, but not conclusive.

    Anyways, on the bottles I've seen, you can actually see under the cap you down the kneck of the bottle. If the lighting is sufficient, you'll be able to make out at least a couple of letters. If you see a number then you have a winner. You'll look like a fool staring down bottles to find a surefire winner, but being a cheapskate isn't glamorous work.

    I don't know any method to win with the 7-11 Big Gulp cups where the code is on the rim of the winning cup. I've gotten 2 of 3 winners using my patented "pick the first cup" algorithm. The only strategy I've heard of to increase your odds is the "double cup". Some people claim that the stores don't mind if you do it, but to me it's crossing over from legitimate "selection optimization" to "theft".

    1. Re:A bit of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't do that. Cups are considered "inventory" at 7-11. The clerks come under fire when they're found missing.

    2. Re:A bit of info by ArekRashan · · Score: 1

      People who claim that 7-11 stores don't mind if you take an extra cup are wrong, wrong, wrong. Caveat: This may be different for stores owned by Southland (the 7-11 corporation), but applies to all 7-11 franchises. Here's how it breaks down. The franchisee doesn't pay much for the cups, but whenever they purchase a cup, they are expected to sell it at full retail value. The franchisee's financial obligations to 7-11 corporate are not based on that franchisee's profit, but their retail sales. If they give away cups, they lose the money used to buy the cups as well as a portion of the retail value of the cups, which they must pay to Southland. In a sense, the cup, and only the cup, is what you are actually purchasing when you buy a big gulp. The soda syrup isn't part of merchandise inventory, and isn't technically "sold". It's actually a miscellaneous selling expense. ~$0.85 will buy you access to the soda fountain as a "refill", and this is about as pure as profit gets. As a test: Go into a 7-11, and look near the cups and trashcans. There should be several signs that say "Cups are inventory. Please do not discard unused cups." Taking an extra cup is technically shoplifting (and illegal!), unless you bring it to the clerk's attention. If the clerk allows you to leave with the extra cup, perhaps the owner of the store needs to hire a different clerk. Of course, it was probably enough of a struggle finding someone both willing to work for a clerk's wages and reliable enough to do a clerk's job.

    3. Re:A bit of info by orb · · Score: 1

      That was my blog entry, not the macmerc article, that you posted. I also post a followup today after seeing the macmerc article. No, it's not exactly rocket science, but it was amusing to discover.

    4. Re:A bit of info by rufo · · Score: 1

      I just want to mention that I find the term "selection optimization" absolutely hilarious.

      That, and I find it hard not to look like a massive tool while doing this. :-)

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    5. Re:A bit of info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've gotten 2 of 3 winners using my patented "pick the first cup" algorithm. The only strategy I've heard of to increase your odds is the "double cup".

      I can verify that the "pick the first cup" algorithm works very well. I'm 6 for 7 this week using that method. No joke! I can't believe it myself.

      As for the double cup method, clearly it's a loser. I went 0 for 2 using that last week. Now if only the damn bottles would show up in my area so I can increase my odds from 6 of 7 to 7 of 7!

  27. Re:I swear.... by MikeXpop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RTFA. It basically tells you to look through the bottle to read the inside of the cap. Purchase is still necessary.

    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  28. Re:Oh come on! The WHOLE pop machine? by netringer · · Score: 5, Funny
    Oowwwww!! I have such a pain!

    I tired this in our break room but I had to tip the entire Pepsi machine over to see which bottle I should buy! I hope the boss didn't see me.

    Is that why they have that picture of the guy being crushed by the pop machine?
    Is it to keep you from checking for iTunes winner bottles?

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  29. Re:I swear.... by therevolution · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is too much to ask of anyone, I know, but maybe you should try reading the article. It teaches you how to tilt the bottle to identify losing/winning game pieces. It is not a method for generating winning codes.

  30. ./ed by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The site has officially been ./'ed

    Does it seriously just advise you to look under the cap? I have been doing that for years, no big suprise there.

  31. Technique been around for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We used to do this when Dr. Pepper was giving away free bottles when I was in high school. Because of the unique shape of the Dr. Pepper bottle you could easily tilt it and read the whole underside of the cap to see if it was a winner. We would make sure the first one was a winner and buy it, then use the winning cap to get another winner..repeat until no more winners in the display case.Pretty sweet. Nothing more difficult than trying to walk to the bus stop with 10-15 bottles of Dr. Pepper without caps though.

    ~dank

  32. I've come up with the perfect iTunes DRM crack by elflet · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but unfortunately this bottle cap is too small to hold it. - Fermat

  33. Re:Priorities by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

    Some advice: Please re-tune your sarcasm detector before posting again.

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  34. Re:I swear.... by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    Buh?

    The "hack" involves tipping the Pepsi bottle in order to see if it's a winner. How would these "cheaters" be tracked down? How would it effect your codes? RTFA.

  35. This is just a port... by boinger · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...of the same crack that me and me l337 hacker bros worked out back in the BBS days to crack a very similar Mountain Dew promotion.

    Good thing we released it GPL. Now those Apache commies can't use it, either!

    Free Tibet!

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
    1. Re:This is just a port... by gwernol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Free Tibet!

      Free Tibet? Now that's a competition! None of this buy crappy Pepsi, win crappy Britney tune. Apparently this dude is giving away whole countries.

      Where do I enter?

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
    2. Re:This is just a port... by bakes · · Score: 1

      Damn 5kr|pt k|dd135 - typical of them to use your hard work and inspiration and pass it off as their own.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
    3. Re:This is just a port... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that reminds me of another slogan.

      "Save the whales... collect the whole set!"

      Thank you, thank you, I'll be here all week.

    4. Re:This is just a port... by beegle · · Score: 1

      He didn't give you all the details. It's actually "Free Tibet with the purchase of any chinese province. May not be combined with any other coupons or promotions."

      --
      --
    5. Re:This is just a port... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get too excited; I'm still waiting for my free Nelson Mandela. It's almost as bad as waiting for mail-in rebates from linksys.

    6. Re:This is just a port... by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      This came to my mind

      From The Family Guy:
      Demonstrators: Free Tibet. free Tibet.
      Peter: I'll take it. Hello China? I have something you want but it's gonna cost you. Yeah, that's right. ...All the tea.

      fs

  36. Re:I swear.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly do you propose they "track down" people who generate random numbers? Bang down their door demanding to see the liners that correspond to their winning numbers?

  37. Check around by andyring · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was working cleanup at a stadium over the weekend, as part of a church fundraiser (I'm an adult advisor for the youth group). Just by picking up empty bottles, I snagged 19 winning caps.

    1. Re:Check around by nzkoz · · Score: 1

      Yes, we should all go pawing through the garbage like some starving racoon. /simpsons quote

      --
      Cheers Koz
    2. Re:Check around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work in a grocery store and me and some other guys always went diving into the bottle room bens for caps, we always got alot (like 20 each).

    3. Re:Check around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in high school, I worked accepting bottle returns (in like 1995 before every place had machines to do it). I used to get all kinds of free shit that way. Mostly free soda, but I also got some free shoes and free movie tickets and stuff.

  38. Quick & Dirty Mirror by Str8Dog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a mirror of the relevant content.

    http://www.str8dog.com/macmerc/

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  39. Article Text by OECD · · Score: 5, Funny

    Warning: Too many connections in /home/macmerc/www/www.macmerc.com/mainfile.php on line 47
    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /home/macmerc/www/www.macmerc.com/mainfile.php on line 47
    Unable to select database

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just tip your monitor at 25 degrees. If you see the word "connections", then you've lost. Move on to the next link.

    2. Re:Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quit complaning, untill slashdot can hold the slashdotting it gives to other people. I've been getting 503 errors all day, even clicking on the reply ling got me a couple.

      Tim

  40. Re:I swear.... by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    RTFA. It basically tells you to look through the bottle to read the inside of the cap. Purchase is still necessary.

    The moderators need to RTFA as well. Who the hell modded this +5 insightful? Karma whore.

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  41. This would never have happened... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if Pepsi filled their bottles all the way up.

  42. I don't understand by Music+To+Eat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all you want is free music, can't you just use Kazza? Why bother scamming iTunes?

    1. Re:I don't understand by zeath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd presume because with iTunes you can take advantage of their reliable and fast servers from which you're guaranteed to get a quality copy of whatever you want to listen to. On the other hand, why anyone would want to subject themselves to Pepsi in the process is beyond me.

  43. Slower and Dirty Mirror by Str8Dog · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a quick and dirty mirror.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  44. Coke has better implementation? by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am not sure if this only happens to Coke. Anyway, in one of a similar promotion (i.e. you win something if the cap says "Winner", otherwise "Again"), the message is in some sort of semi-transparent rubbery sheet, which is pushed into the cap, reversed.

    So normally you cannot see anything thru this rubbery sheet, and the message is on the other side (i.e. facing the cap).

    I wonder why Pepsi didn't use a better solution.

    1. Re:Coke has better implementation? by krogoth · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I remember those little plastic circles that were impossible to dig out of the caps... they would be great for reducing the number of winners, but maybe Pepsi actually doesn't want that?

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    2. Re:Coke has better implementation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In the late 80's Coke had a promotion running in Canada that was '1 in 8 chances to win a free Coke'

      After several winning purchases, I noticed that all the caps were imprinted with parallel lines |, ||, ... |||||||| just above the perforated seal.

      The winning bottles were all marked the six lines.

      I would go into a particular store and rummage through all the bottle until I found two with the six marking, pay my nickle (deposit) open the bottle, get the liner, pay another nickle and so on. After the initial purchase, I got Coke for 5 cents for the rest of the summer.

    3. Re:Coke has better implementation? by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      I wonder why Pepsi didn't use a better solution.

      Did you check USPTO site for "coke, promotion, cap"?

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    4. Re:Coke has better implementation? by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      Here in canada, both Pepsi and Coke use this method. But I work in a convenience store (depanneur) so I just look through the bottle return bags in the back. If only this contest was available here. Now Pepsi's promotion is some stupid "Backstage Access to the Muchmusic Video Awards" Anyone have any itunes codes for me?

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
  45. Re:TUBGIRL -- MOD PARENT DOWN by Str8Dog · · Score: 1

    what are you drunk?

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  46. I'm intrigued by gonzocanuck2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the bottle cap contests I've seen (since I was a little kid) had the answer printed on the cap liner, but facing inwards, not outwards. Hmm, maybe the Canadian version knows something the parent corp doesn't!

    1. Re:I'm intrigued by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      Pepsi quit using cap liners quite awhile ago. I'm sure it saves them a fraction of a cent or so on each bottle.

    2. Re:I'm intrigued by gonzocanuck2 · · Score: 1

      Weird...I guess not in Canada, I had a pile of blue Pepsi cap liners with points on them last summer. Never used them for anything though.

    3. Re:I'm intrigued by SlashSim · · Score: 1


      Not in Canada, they didn't.

      --
      If the only tool you have is a hammer, you'd better start looking for a carpentry job.
    4. Re:I'm intrigued by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      I bought a Pepsi today, even though I drink Coke, just to check and you were right. It had the little blue plastic bit... Perhaps it was Coke. I remember I was quite impressed the first time I saw one. At least I won a "free" itune. Now I'm off to try and get itunes to run under wine.

  47. It's NOT a crack...you still have to buy it! by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not truly a crack in my view, since one still has to buy the bottle to obtain the complete, usable code; I bet Pepsi really doesn't care since they're still moving product.

    Ron

    1. Re:It's NOT a crack...you still have to buy it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The store owner won't care either. You're still buying the damn bottle. In fact, you should go through the whole shelf and tell the clerk you want to purchase those 24 bottles. They won't think twice about the sale.

  48. Cheaters never prosper by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    Just think, they guys have managed to get a few songs for free and told others how to do the same.

    Of course when they get their bandwidth bill after this /.ing, do you think they will have come out ahead? They would have to drink a lot of Pepsi for that to happen.

  49. The Random Odds by MBraynard · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Pepsi is giving away 100 million songs, so I was thinking that there was a good possibility of people trying to hack it by guessing the codes to get the free song.

    I got a winning cap and did some math. Unless the codes are not random, this isn't going to happen.

    There are 8 digits in the code, and they appear to use alphas and digits. Presuming they aren't using zero so it's not confused with the letter "O," this means there are 1.0E+35 possibilities. With 100 million winners, that means one in every 1.0E+27 is a winner. Spelt out, that is 1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

    However, given that it is not random, I guess the odds are much better.

    1. Re:The Random Odds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 10 alphanumeric characters, two sets of 5. They use 0 and O, 0 has a line through it to mark the difference.

      so 36^10 possibilities, but there may be some sort of method for picking from that population which ones they send off to be winners.

    2. Re:The Random Odds by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      doh! - you are right. There are 10 digits!

    3. Re:The Random Odds by Cyranith · · Score: 0

      Umm...

      shouldn't that be

      8^35?

      = 2,251,875,390,625

      and since 100 Million is 100,000,000

      The odds are actually

      1 in 22,518

    4. Re:The Random Odds by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      I've seen both zeros (0) and ohs (O) on the winning caps. The ohs are much more elongated in the horizontal direction, which is how you can tell them apart, though it is still somewhat confusing.

      Not that it makes too much difference, as the odds are already astronomical, but I just thought I'd point this out.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    5. Re:The Random Odds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there are 10 digits in the code. Do you know how to count?

      Are you sure?

    6. Re:The Random Odds by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      No, I don't know how to count. Or do math. Isn't that apparent? Did you really need to bring it up and embarass me?

      ...

      JUST SHUT UP OK! YOU ARENT MY REAL DAD!

    7. Re:The Random Odds by akuzi · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are 10 alpha-numeric digits - i don't know if they avoid zero, but if they do that means:

      35^10 = 2758547353515625 possible codes

      divide by 100 million and you get 1 chance in 27585473.

    8. Re:The Random Odds by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      ..Not that this applies here but...

      If you want to prevent confusion between 0 and O, you need to omit both, unless the user somehow knows which one is not possible.

      If you are using lower case, make sure to omit 1 and l too.

      When generating random passwords to be emailed to people, I omit IilLoO01. You could omit 2Z5S as well. (who knows what font it will end up in).

    9. Re:The Random Odds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you arrive at 1.0E+35?

      Here's how I would calculate the odds:

      36 possibilities per position
      10 positions
      Combinations: 36*36*36*36... or 36^10 or 3.66E+15 or 3,656,158,440,062,980

      Am I correct or did I misunderstand the code?

      Drink up. : )

  50. Not funny. by fuzebox · · Score: 1

    Alright guys, you can stop clicking the link now... The guys at the colo are rebooting that box, give it a few minutes :)

    1. Re:Not funny. by NiteTrip · · Score: 0

      This Link ?

  51. Like iTunes? Hate Pepsi? by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    I found a $up3r 733T method to get my game on without
    buying pepsi products.

    7-11

    grab a big gulp cup (or two if you want to double your chances)
    fill it with a Coke product and pay for it.

    much better then tipping pepsi in the store.....
    a gateway crime for sure, whats next? unscrewing the caps
    and leaving with em? :)

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  52. Purchase may not be necessary? by blorg · · Score: 1
    RTFA. It basically tells you to look through the bottle to read the inside of the cap. Purchase is still necessary.

    Ok, I didn't read the article because it is slashdotted, but I did look at this photo of the bottle cap seen through the bottle. That's a losing bottle, but 'AGAIN' is clearly visible (I'm presuming you'd be able to see an upside-down 'PLAY' if you turned it over) - so would a winning code not also be visible, and transcribable, without purchase?

    1. Re:Purchase may not be necessary? by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      That photo is from the article btw (I read it before it hit /.). Short answer, no. The article describes seeing a bunch of random numbers and telling you to grab that pepsi. Really, it'd be easier and a lot less suspicious to just unscrew the cap and put it in your pocket than to hold a pepsi up, turning it, and writing the number into your palm pilot at the same time.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  53. book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.obrien.ie/book505.cfm

  54. Already over the 200 limit. by i_am_syco · · Score: 1

    I drink Pepsi like water, and friends give me their caps at school, so I'm already over the 200 cap limit. Really.

    1. Re:Already over the 200 limit. by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

      I drink Pepsi like water, and friends give me their caps at school, so I'm already over the 200 cap limit. Really.

      Maybe Pepsi should be giving away a free diabetes exam instead.

    2. Re:Already over the 200 limit. by sH4RD · · Score: 1

      With the way Americans love free stuff that would probably be a success. The philosophy is "if it's free, I must have it!"

      --
      WASTE - The Secure P2P
    3. Re:Already over the 200 limit. by BigBadBri · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Lloyd's Chemists in the UK are offering free diabetes tests to all UK adults - one of the better promos that a pharmacy chain could come up with.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  55. Dang... by sH4RD · · Score: 1

    This must be a pretty poor quality server...it lasted 10 minutes before it stopped responding...

    --
    WASTE - The Secure P2P
    1. Re:Dang... by fuzebox · · Score: 1

      Was a hell of a lot of database load. *shrug* It's doing great with the flat file now though...

  56. It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Next step: a Pepsi/iTMS winning number generator

    It would be a nice gesture for the person who gets this running to give 1000 tunes to each of the pirates forced to appear in the Pepsi-Apple-RIAA Superbowl commercial as penance for their sins.

    Steve Jobs once asked John Sculley if he wanted to change the world -- or just sell sugar water for the rest of his life. Now it seems that Jobs is the one selling Pepsi!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really say that Apple or Steve Jobs could be described as "selling Pepsi," unless you count...what....a few hours' worth of Objective-C to handle the code system Pepsi wanted in exchange for a $100,000,000 check.

    2. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      For some reason the thought of people being forced to appear in commercials or face financial consequences reminds me of the geniva convention regarding prisioner of war humiliation.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like Pepsi is selling ITMS to me...

    4. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "I wouldn't really say that Apple or Steve Jobs could be described as "selling Pepsi," unless you count...what....a few hours' worth of Objective-C to handle the code system Pepsi wanted in exchange for a $100,000,000 check"

      Pepsi won't be paying a $100 million check to Apple unless all 100 million songs are redeemed. As it stands, Pepsi is betting that only 10% to 20% of them will. So it is in the best interest of Apple fans (or simply computer fans, or anti-Pepsi-ites) to make sure that every redeemable code is used. After all, would you rather Pepsi have that extra $100 million to make the next Crystal Pepsi or would you rather have Apple with the extra $100 million to develop the next iPod?

      The Lynxpro
      (not signed in at work)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    5. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by Wumpus · · Score: 1

      This is really funny if you remember that Apple's former CEO, John Scully, was recruited from Pepsi by Steve Jobs, who asked him: "Do you want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life?"

    6. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wondered about that myself. I was curious as to why Pepsi rather than Coke. Maybe the smaller market share means they can put the same number of bottles out and make it seem like more?

      In any case, I'd be interested to see how this affects the market share, if at all.

    7. Re:It Would be a Nice Gesture if... by Mmm_Coco · · Score: 1

      the nice thing about a cent is that it doesn't count for anything at all, unless you're in the really high numbers. you overestimated the amount by one million dollars

  57. Warning: Joke by elvum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think someone should start a business selling CDs full of random numbers.

    1. Re:Warning: Joke by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know it's a joke, but I'll bite anyway:

      They already do

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    2. Re:Warning: Joke by Orne · · Score: 1

      Hell, white noise is more pleasing to listen to than Corey Feldman's Band...

    3. Re:Warning: Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think someone should start a business selling CDs full of random numbers.

      I've got your company's tagline:
      "1 in 2^(# of bits on a CD) chance of getting the software you wanted!"

    4. Re:Warning: Joke by elvum · · Score: 5, Funny

      At last we can finally put to rest the national stereotype of the Germans as humourless.

    5. Re:Warning: Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've got your company's tagline:

      "1 in 2^(# of bits on a CD) chance of getting the software you wanted!"


      1 in 2^5452595200. Or roughly 1 in 1-then-560,000,000-zeroes.

    6. Re:Warning: Joke by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      Offtopic: Sounds like the probability Windows will ever get bug-free.

    7. Re:Warning: Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, it's kinda open source now.

    8. Re:Warning: Joke by m33p · · Score: 1

      you mean like this: http://www.spynumbers.com/cdrom.html ????

    9. Re:Warning: Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, CDs filled with real white noise are actually pretty expensive and sometimes used in digital signal processing.

    10. Re:Warning: Joke by ashot · · Score: 2, Funny

      even better.

      --
      -ashot
  58. If you let your kids drink soda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they may become obese and have painful problems, both emotionally and physically - later in life. Please turn them on to something healthy if you love them.

  59. You forgot... by blorg · · Score: 1

    4. PROFIT!

  60. Now you tell me! by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

    I just got back from the store with my iTunes Diet Pepsi. Message under the cap: PLEASE PLAY AGAIN. Oh well.

    Interestingly, the shelf was fairly barren. Want to bet that the majority (if not all) of the remaining bottles are losers? I wonder what this does to the one in three odds?

    --
    Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    1. Re:Now you tell me! by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

      The odds stay the same. Statistically, depending on how you look at it, 1 in 3 can never happen. You also have the chance of always winning, or always losing, or winning 2/3 of the time, depending on how lucky you are. There's no mathematical way to really explain it.

      Unless of course, EVERY bottle was tracked, winners and losers, even those that go unclaimed. Then, you could get real odds in realtime, but that would probably require some sort of RFID. We're not there... yet...

      --

      [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    2. Re:Now you tell me! by Obyron · · Score: 1

      I wonder what this does to the one in three odds?

      Absolutely nothing. If I buy 3 bottles and all three are winners while you buy 6 that are all losers, the probability is still one and three. It's like that old 'trick' question: "If a flipped coin lands 'heads' 9 times in a row, what's the probability it will land heads the next time it's flipped?"

      --
      --Obyron
    3. Re:Now you tell me! by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 1

      There's got to be some effect if someone "games" the system and disproportionately removes most of the winners.

      A more appropriate example: if I flip 10 coins, what's the probability that any given one is heads if some wise ass goes in ahead of you and turns all the heads over to tails!? Pretty much zero I'd say.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    4. Re:Now you tell me! by Obyron · · Score: 1

      There's got to be some effect if someone "games" the system and disproportionately removes most of the winners.

      Not really. There are still the same numbers of winners and losers as there were when the bottles hit the shelves.

      For example, say the ABC Grain Company makes 3000 boxes of their new cereal (Homicidal Choco Puffs). One thousand of those boxes include a limited edition whistle that when blown will rupture the eardrums of anyone within 20 feet if they're not wearing a special set of earplugs (sold separately).

      Obviously, everyone wants one of these whistles. Some enterprising young man does a little research and finds that he can "hand weigh" the boxes and tell by the slight difference in weight which ones have whistles and which just have ABC Grain Company's really disgusting cereal. He promptly goes out and buys all one thousand boxes.

      The end result of this is that everyone else gets screwed. The localized probability for YOU getting a whistle is 0, but the overall probability is STILL 1 in 3. It's just that someone else has all the "1"s. :)

      --
      --Obyron
    5. Re:Now you tell me! by pr0c · · Score: 1

      So you are saying you stole a bunch of whistles?

  61. More soda? by FuryG3 · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will result in pesi putting more soda in their bottles. Probably not.

  62. Great Way to Go Slahsdot Give into the Media Hype by greymond · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd just like to point out again for the record that NO ONE has been arrested/sued by the RIAA for DOWNLOADING music. They have been sued for SHARING their music files. Yes I know the News and Magazines keep saying "Music Downloaders" and "Downloading Music" but thats just so people will be afraid to use P2P softare for legitemate uses, such as Downloading the mp3s to the Bjork CD I own that is scratched and unplayable...

    With that said, I understand this is somewhat news, but honestly your not really scamming or solving anything here. People are buying songs from itunes - good for them, people are downloading songs from itunes for free - GREAT you just made the powers that be "right" that music "Downloaders" are "teh d3v1l".

    Congratz.

  63. double standard here at slashdot sometimes by 0xfc · · Score: 1

    > Next step: a Pepsi/iTMS winning number generator!

    I know this is meant as a joke but some do not take it like that. I am tired of people saying hackers/crackers are bad. Then along comes a slashdot admin who makes a sly joke about hacking/cracking a system.

    You cannot have it both ways! Do not make jokes about cracking to sound cool and savy. I consider it in bad taste.

    And oh yea, remember the ebay post about auctioning phone numbers, that got twisted into auctioning slashdot uids? well, i think it would be savy and cool to code up a brute force tool to crack those same uids. for free. yea sounds cool eh?!?

    how does it feel when someone makes a joke about cracking your fucking system? uid 69 will soon be mine after i crack the system!

    my god that sounds retarded.

    1. Re:double standard here at slashdot sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody said anything about hacking or cracking any systems. cracking an algorithm maybe...

  64. Not a crack. It is a cheat. by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This doesn't even qualify as social engineering. Social engineering would involve asking someone for their winning bottle cap. Here is my crack:

    Stand outside 7-Eleven and ask people for their bottle caps.

    For example, I was in Brazil in 1994 and Coke ran a promo for the World Cup. Each bottle cap had three teams on it in order. If you ended up with the top three teams in the correct order you won a bunch of money. Bartenders became very adept at cracking open your bottle open and pocketing the cap.

    Anyhow, this is certainly a simple cheat rather than a clever hack.

  65. Re:I swear.... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    Simple:

    Person A peeks into the bottle at the store and finds a valid code. Redeems code for music.

    Person B, sometime later, actually buys bottle and discovers valid code. Redeems code... ...oops, that code has already been used.

    Person B reports incident and/or Apple logs attempt to use code more than once.

    Jailarity insues. (Hope fully Person B kept the bottlecap and/or receipt...)
    =Smidge=

  66. Exciting times we live in... by general_re · · Score: 5, Funny
    I mean, really--the tipping of the bottle I could probably get to, but then to look through the clear plastic--inspired, my friend, inspired.

    The Four-Color Map theorem.
    Kepler's Sphere-Packing problem.
    Fermat's Last Theorem.
    And now this.

    Brilliant.

    --
    ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    1. Re:Exciting times we live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Four-Color Map theorem.
      Kepler's Sphere-Packing problem.
      Fermat's Last Theorem.


      Anyone here fit in the nobel nominators category? I would like to participate in a nomination.

      Thanks

  67. When will Pepsi learn,, by Mynt-E · · Score: 1

    Way back when Pepsi first started with their Pepsi points, you could do the same thing to see if you had won a free bottle or not. Then Pepsi got sick of it, and made all of the cap liners grey so you couldn't see through them. This is in Canada anyway, and they still do it.

  68. Six Ticks on the Cap = Winner! by Cordath · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember a long time ago, when I was in junior high, Coca-Cola had an under-the-cap contest going. The twist was that every bottle had tick-code on the cap. If there were 6 vertical lines, you were guaranteed to at least win a free soda. Needless to say, the employees at the gas-station down the road from my school (right in front of the bus stop) got very sick of junior-high kids going through every last bottle in the cooler looking for a six-tick bottle that had been miraculously missed by the 200 other kids that had already been through the place.

  69. Re:Not a crack. It is a cheat. by tedtimmons · · Score: 1

    You're right, cheat is a much better word for it.

    I meant that it is more similar to social engineering than it is to a crack.

  70. No! You're on drugs! by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    For anybody who doesn't catch the reference, it's from Suicidal Tendencies's song Institutionalized.

    They put me in a DRM institution
    Said it was the only P2P solution
    Give me the needed Recording Industry help
    To protect me from the enemy, myself

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    1. Re:No! You're on drugs! by DougInthezoo · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, you'll probably get hit by a car anyway...

  71. Re:QUICK AND DIRTY = TUBGIRL -- MOD PARENT DOWN by Str8Dog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes apparently I have been trolled... thanks asshat

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  72. Re:double standard here at slashdot sometimes MOD by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    I know this is meant as a joke but some do not take it like that.

    MOD Parent Lighten-Up +1

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  73. thank you captain obvious by happyslinky · · Score: 4, Funny

    for the next front page writeup at slashdot we have:
    "WATER H4X0R3D... found to be wet" and
    "GRASS P0WN3D.. GREEN ENSUES"

  74. Re:I swear.... by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    Except for the fact you can't see the entire code from under the cap, punching a slight hole in your idea.

    Nice try, though.

  75. I know you were kidding but... by wankledot · · Score: 2, Informative
    Actually the dark surface makes it MUCH easier to see the reflection.

    And they do have caps on the "Sierra Mist" (sprite/7up-esque) drinks too.

    Still, some people will pay $1.10-$1.49 to get a free 99 song... that's just amazing.

    --
    My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    1. Re:I know you were kidding but... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't they color the plastic on the Sprite type drinks though?

      I actually didn't read the original (/.ed) article so I didn't know that it was the reflection that was being used. That makes this slightly more novel.

      Now if only Dr Pepper were giving away free music...

    2. Re:I know you were kidding but... by wankledot · · Score: 1
      Yeah, they're green, but still transparent enough. might be a little harder.

      The fact that it's a reflection does make it a little more interesting, and difficult, as you have to hold it very steady so as not to disturb the soda surface.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    3. Re:I know you were kidding but... by Samhaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...unless of course you drink the stuff anyways, in which case it's either a free 99 cent song or a 99 cent discount on the cost of the drink :p

    4. Re:I know you were kidding but... by Kesh · · Score: 1

      Still, some people will pay $1.10-$1.49 to get a free 99 song... that's just amazing.

      Not really. It's $1.29 here for a 20 oz bottle.

      Figure $0.99 for the song, $0.30 for the soda, and I'm happy. ;)

    5. Re:I know you were kidding but... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not the reflection that's being used. It's looking through the actual bottle.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    6. Re:I know you were kidding but... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I have just now been able to read the original article. One of the parents implied that the reflection was being used somehow, which at least would have been novel. Instead it seems that they are documenting a technique known to 13-year olds everywhere. I know that when I was younger my friends and I tried this once or twice.

    7. Re:I know you were kidding but... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, if I hadn't seen that article, I wouldn't have thought of trying that. :P

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    8. Re:I know you were kidding but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's around 1.50 euro where i am, which is about $2

      We don't have the iTMS and thus no free 'giveaway'

      Go on, admit it. You Yanks are screwing the world from every direction

    9. Re:I know you were kidding but... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, we're giving ourselves the giveaway, yet somehow you Anti-but-wannabe-Americans think we're screwing everyone else.

      Go away and STFU with all your whining.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:I know you were kidding but... by rufo · · Score: 1

      I know.

      Me neither. :-/

      Should we start a "blissfully aware of painfully obvious facts" club? ;-)

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    11. Re:I know you were kidding but... by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      Then make your own cola and start selling it. If the world is truly getting screwed from every direction as you say, then surely some crafty young entrepreneur is poised on the brink of billions in soda profits.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
  76. I beg to differ... by IshanCaspian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not if you just take the cap off....

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
  77. Server down by Ec|ipse · · Score: 1

    As of about a minute ago, server went from, "Sorry guys, server can't take /." to 404 error not found.

  78. I drink pepsi now by ABaumann · · Score: 1

    well, I don't generally drink soda, but being a college student, part of what my parents pay for is my food money. That being said, if I start buying pepsi, I don't pay for it, my "lunch money" does. So I am technically getting free iTunes.

  79. Didn't work by rixstep · · Score: 5, Funny

    This didn't work for me.

    I took the Pepsi bottle cap, inserted it into my PC CD drive, and could read nothing.

    But I forgot to hold down Shift - that may be why.

    I just wish people would document these hacks properly before publishing them. I'm pretty computer-savvy, so I don't think it was a mistake on my part.

    1. Re:Didn't work by kingrat · · Score: 1

      Did you draw a ring around the cap with a magic marker?

    2. Re:Didn't work by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You forgot to color the rim of the cap black with a Sharpie.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  80. mirror by calyptos · · Score: 1

    I got it on my site, hopefully i'll save them some bandwidth. All that was there was a directory listing of some images, so i put them up.

    Here

    --
    http://illhostit.com/ - Webhosting
  81. Re:Not a crack. It is a cheat. by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I guess the definition of crack varies from person to person. If you wanted you could simply enter the store and start opening Pepsis until you won, and then only buy that one. I am sure the reaction of the store employees would be a bit more harsh than if they caught you ripping apart six-packs and handling every bottle you could find. In my opinion, the two approaches are about on the same level.

    I do think that social engineering is a form of hacking. I don't think that anybody would claim that the social engineering that Mitnick did wasn't hacking. This doesn't seem to rise to that level though.

    Perhaps it is because you still buy the Pepsi and Pepsi didn't really take any measures to stop you from doing this. It there were some clever way to read the number without opening the bottle that might qualify as a hack. Say, taking an ultra-violet photo of the bottom of the bottle that allowed you to see through the Pepsi to read the complete number. That would qualify as a hack.

    For some reason the approach we are discussing seems too pathetic to qualify as a hack. Perhaps my standards are too high.

  82. No soda here by ktulu1115 · · Score: 0

    You insensitive clod!

    I don't drink soda.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  83. Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by bonch · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Would you rather sell sugar water to kids for the rest of your life, or do you want to change the world?"

    Steve Jobs to that guy from Pepsi. It's on folklore.org somewhere. The Bouncing Pepsis story, I believe.

    1. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by l3prador · · Score: 5, Informative

      that guy from Pepsi. John Sculley, who subsequently joined Apple, kicked out Steve Jobs and let Bill Gates use Mac features in Windows 1.0. Change the world, he did. :(

    2. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

      And now Steve jobs is....selling sugar water to teenagers. Yaaaaahoooooooo

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by rixstep · · Score: 5, Informative

      Famous Steve Jobs quote on Pepsi guy:

      John Sculley ruined Apple, and he ruined it by bringing a set of values to the top of Apple which were corrupt and corrupted some of the top people who were there, drove out some of the ones who were not corruptible, and brought in more corrupt ones and paid themselves collectively tens of millions of dollars and cared more about their own glory and wealth than they did about what built Apple in the first place - which was making great computers for people to use.

    4. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah, who invited this guy... d'oh!

    5. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sculley is the only CEO in Apple history who both managed to both keep Apple profitable and increase Mac sales year-to-year every year. None of the other three Mac-era CEOs -- Jobs, Spindler, or Amelio -- managed the trick.

      So, yeah, Sculley ruined Apple: he made it profitable and expanded the Mac user base. Such horrible crimes. Real Apple fans know the goal is to become an ever-shrinking demographic until the Mac is sitting on the same shelf as the Amiga, clung to in irrelevancy by rabid fans.

    6. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by rixstep · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jobs didn't say profits. He said making good products. Sculley didn't do squat, and that was Jobs's objection: from 1984 until jobs's return, Apple had one product, from all the way back in 1984: the Macintosh.

      Jonathan Ive was more or less put on ice until Jobs discovered him working there. Jobs has otherwise done quite a job himself in turning the company around.

      Besides - and this is the clincher - what if Sculley had been good for Apple? Just think how much better he would have been if he and his cohorts hadn't pocketed all that money Jobs speaks of? Just think how much better off Apple would have been!

    7. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yep, Jobs's objection was that Sculley wasn't making "good products". All Sculley did was manage to actually sell Macs. Which is, you know, kinda important to anyone who likes the Mac platform, instead of being merely a fanboy who cheers Apple-the-company like it's a sports team.

      Let's look at how well Jobs has been doing selling Macs:

      Macintoshes sold annually, starting year of Jobs's return:
      1997: 2,874,000
      1998: 2,763,000
      1999: 3,448,000
      2000: 4,558,000
      2001: 3,087,000
      2002: 3,101,000
      2003: 3,012,000

      Quite a "turnaround", isn't it? Look, the 2003 number is a whole 5% higher than the 1997 number! And of course, the numbers hide the fact that there were quite a few clones sold in 1997 and 1998, so the total number of Mac-platform computers would be higher those years.

      Ah, but the company is selling "cool" products like the iPod and turing a profit, so who cares that the Mac is stagnating, selling only as many units per year under the Jobs revival as it was in Sculley's last year at Apple?

    8. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      And exactly how many Macs did they sell in Sculley's last year at Apple? You didn't list the figure...

      For reference, Sculley's last year at Apple was 1994. After that, Mike Markkula took over. In 1995, Gil Amelio took over. Then The Holy And Praised Return Of The Steve occurred in 1997. Sculley pushed one and only one good product... the Newton. Unfortunately, he didn't last long enough to push it to the unassailable top of the heap.

      Then Markkula pushed the Performa, killed Newton for all practical intents and purposes, and diversified the product line into about 35 different models.

      Amelio is generally an underrated Apple exec. He killed most of those product lines (which were milking Apple dry), tried to revive the Newton, despite Palm's arrival on the scene, and discovered Jonathan Ive and promptly set him on the task of making the iMac. Amelio made two mistakes: clones (which kept the milking going even after the product line was trimmed) and buying NeXT and bringing Steve Jobs on board.

      Steve Jobs threw Amelio off the roof, stole his praise, and fortunately, kept up the good moves Amelio had started. Note that after Amelio's projects were finished, Steve's first pet project bombed. The G4 cube was a market failure.

      Lately, they've been focusing less on cool new computer features and focusing more on cool new software (iApps, MacOS X, etc.) and cool new peripherals to help the computer get things done (iPod, iSight, etc.). That might account for the drop in sales. The economy's current shitter-dwelling state also might have something to do with that.

      So, a short review: Sculley was not pushing the Mac like he should've been, but he wasn't killing the company like Markkula did. Amelio actually was turning Apple around until Jobs fucked him in the ass and took all the credit. Jobs isn't as wonderful as some people would have you believe, but he is doing the best he can in the current market environment.

      Oh, and you need to learn a little Apple history. Consider this your first lesson.

    9. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by sendai2ci · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Moofie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet, the company was profitable throughout the tech downturn.

      Sales growth is not the be-all end-all of corporate performance. Me, I'm much happier that Apple is focusing on building superior machines than trying to be another crappy VAR.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Blic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think Amelio will always have a bad rap, but he performed the essential role he was hired for - hatchet man.

      See, you hire someone, have them cut lots of fat out of the company, fire lots of folks, and consequently everyone hates them. Then you get rid of them and in swoops the savior to take control of a leaner, restructured company without any of the ill will because you just fired everyone's friends.

    12. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, no, I don't need to learn about Apple history, I know it rather better than you apparently do. You also seem to be conflating the posts of two different people, but . . .

      The number of Macs sold in 1994 is not available from the SEC 10-K filings the above figures were drawn from. However, the year-to-year percentage change in sales are available back to the 1994 filing (earliest available on the web), which has data back to 1993.

      Reconstructed from those, we can derive the following approximate figures, assuming I did the math right:

      1996: 3,650,000
      1995: 4,051,000
      1994: 3,523,000
      1993: 3,037,000

      However, to really judge Sculley, we'd have to look at the 1984-1993 numbers, when he was in charge. If you can find them, I'd be glad to see them. I'm willing to bet they show continual sales growth 1984-1993, vs. the stagnation that's happened since.

      The economy's current shitter-dwelling state also might have something to do with that.

      That might make a good explanation, except that worldwide personal computer unit sales have climbed.

      IDC estimated numbers, total personal computers shipped, vs. Apple 10-K numbers of Macs shipped:
      1994: 47,300,000 vs. 3,523,000 (est.)
      1995: 59,500,000 vs. 4,051,000 (est.)
      1996: 70,200,000 vs. 3,650,000 (est.)
      1997: 81,400,000 vs. 2,874,000
      1998: 91,900,000 vs. 2,763,000
      1999: 112,000,000 vs. 3,448,000
      2000: 134,800,000 vs. 4,558,000
      2001: 133,500,000 vs. 3,087,000
      2002: 136,900,000 vs. 3,101,000
      2003: 152,600,000 vs. 3,012,000

      If Apple had maintained its marketshare after Sculley left, it would have sold 11.4 million Macs last year. If it had just maintained the clone-eaten marketshare it had when Jobs took over in 1997, it would have sold 5.4 million Macs last year. Hell, if it had been able to simply maintain pure volume numbers after the 2000 surge, it would have sold 4.5 million units.

      Instead, in a year when the worldwide computer market showed double-digit percentage growth, Apple managed to sell fewer computers worldwide than during the previous year!

      Jobs is doing a pretty good job running Apple as a profitable buisness. But he's clearly either unable to sell computers, or doesn't care to, merely using the Macintosh as a source of funding for other projects he finds more interesting. If you're a Mac user who would like to be able to buy a Mac five years from now, instead of merely an Apple-the-company fan, that's a problem.

    13. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

      The quote can be found here, right at the bottom of the page.

      --
      Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
    14. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh, and you need to learn a little Apple history. Consider this your first lesson.

      Mike Markkula was, of course, the first Apple CEO, pre-Scully. You're thinking of Mike Spindler. Now, time to get back to that history of Apple book.

    15. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by zonker · · Score: 0

      yeah, that ever shrinking demo is also part of what sculley managed to create for apple. sculley looked at the short term like a typical enron executive. how much money can i make this quarter? instead of looking to the long term. what projects can we do that will make us a bundle in the long term and keep us going well into the future?

    16. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of needing to learn Apple History.

      Before Amelio was SPINDLER, for several years. He was the worst CEO Apple ever had, putting Apple in the downturn that Amelio was brought on board to reverse.

    17. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by anourkey · · Score: 1

      Could it be that Macs have a longer useful life than a PC? If we were to suppose that Apple was putting superior computers into the market place that only have to be replaced 1/3 - 1/4 less often as a PC, these numbers seem somewhat justifiable. just my $0.02

    18. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One AC deserves another.

      It was Michael Spindler. Markkula was a very early venture capitalist involved with managing Apple.

    19. Re:Famous Steve Jobs quote to Pepsi guy by platypussrex · · Score: 0

      Lately, they've been focusing less on cool new computer features and focusing more on cool new software (iApps, MacOS X, etc.) and cool new peripherals to help the computer get things done (iPod, iSight, etc.).

      ummm, what about the powerbook line? and the G5 machines? I kind of thought both of those were pretty cool.

  84. Re:TUBGIRL -- MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sicko. stop posting tubgirl redirects

  85. This is a good mirror, *NOT* Tubgirl - MOD UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is not a troll, and it is not Tubgirl! (I'd actually forgotten what that was and went looking - urgh.) Thanks for the mirror, Str8Dog.

  86. The best part of the article by emkman · · Score: 4, Funny

    The best part of this amusing if lame article, is without a doubt the Mountain Dew eBay link.

    --
    Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
    1. Re:The best part of the article by Maxwell309 · · Score: 1

      The ebay mountain dew bottle is really funny, but probably a hoax. It is simple enough to get a cap off a bottle without breaking the "tamper resistant" seal.

      --
      "DRM is like violence: if it doesn't work, use more."
    2. Re:The best part of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is simple enough to get a cap off a bottle without breaking the "tamper resistant" seal.

      how?

  87. Fatal flaw by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You actually have to buy the pepsi! It costs $1.09-$1.29. Even worse if you accidentally drink the pepsi!

    1. Re:Fatal flaw by mlk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not if you can read the number. Just jot it down, and claim your prize.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    2. Re:Fatal flaw by Xyd · · Score: 1

      You've failed to recognize one thing: Those kids on the commercial have now read the website and will be using this l33t haxor to find the winning bottles. They will then remove and pocket the caps from aforementioned bottles thus receive the song for free. Pepsi without lids. Sounds like some sort of bad funk band.

  88. new way to steal music... by aceh0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    just take the winning bottle caps. the cool thing is when the RIAA comes a knocking at your door you could feasibly have hundreds of bottle caps to throw at their minions.

  89. Sorta works by Xibby · · Score: 1

    Just brabbed a Pepsi out of the vending machine. This "crack" doesn't work if the bottle has been through a vending machine. You can't see anything through the foam.

    After the bottle settled a bit, you can tip it and rotate and if you're lucky see if you have a 3 line or 4 line cap. I was able to tell that the vending machine gave me a winning cap, but there is no way I could make out the text as the images show. The wavy design prevents it with a full bottle.

    Even after draining the bottle I can't read the text. Either Pepsi has different bottles for different regions or the article aurhors put the cap on a 2 liter for their photos.

    YMMV.

    --
    I'm going to go back in my box and will think within the limits of my box: MS Sucks Linux Good I read too much Slashdot.
    1. Re:Sorta works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just brabbed a Pepsi out of the vending machine. This "crack" doesn't work if the bottle has been through a vending machine. You can't see anything through the foam

      does it really matter if it works in a vending machine or not? you have to buy it no matter what, but if you see it in a store, you only have to buy the winners.

    2. Re:Sorta works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm

      the point is to grab a winning bottle before you actually purchase it, so why would you even need to do this from a vending machine? or are you from Poland?

  90. Re:Great Way to Go Slahsdot Give into the Media Hy by rolocroz · · Score: 1

    Oh bullshit. Be honest, when was the last time you - or anyone else out there - downloaded something you legitimately owned?

    --

    I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

  91. Patent: How to get free winning caps! by russotto · · Score: 1

    Claim 1: A technique for obtaining winning caps involving a person, a trash receptacle, and a collection receptacle wherein the user searches through the trash receptacle for winning caps and places them in the collection receptacle.

    Claim 2: The method of Claim 1 where the trash receptacle is chosen for its likelyhood of containing Pepsi caps.

    Claim 3: The method of Claim 1 where the user wears rubber gloves

    Claim 4: The method of Claim 1 where the trash receptacle is a Dumpster

    Claim 5: The method of Claim 1 where the user showers afterwards.

    Claim 6: A technique for obtaining winning caps involving a person, a trash receptacle, an intermediate receptacle, a sieve, and a collection receptacle wherein the user sieves the trash receptacle into the intermediate receptacle to remove items larger than bottlecaps, then searches the intermediate receptacle for winning caps.

    etc.

  92. Decisions Decisions by Stonent1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Do I want to steal music (pepsi promo) or steal music (p2p)?

  93. Best promotion by Hobobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This promotion is probably the best I've seen in a while. Three benefits:
    1. To Pepsi - increased sales
    2. To Apple - more people use and know about iTunes
    3. To RIAA - people consider free music downloads a prize rather than taken for granted
    Also, because it is so unique it recieves much more publicity than other promotions (such as this article).

    1. Re:Best promotion by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately the advertising for this promotion is absolutely abyssmal. Words cannot describe how infuriated I get when the stupid commercial comes on with some of the kids who got sued. Not only is the script fairly stupid, but that song just pisses me off to no end.

      "I fought the law, and the, law won."

      Seriously, is this and ad for the promotion? Or is it an anti-piracy ad? I mean god, I'm sorry, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants to commit a violent act every time that spot comes on.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  94. Mod Parent back up, Actual Mirror by Rew190 · · Score: 1

    Never trust an Anonymous Coward... parent's link is an actual mirror for the Pepsi/iTMS giveaway.

  95. Re:NOT TUBGIRL -- MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahem, Dont reply with the same subject line as your troll.

  96. Good Thing... by pablo_max · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good thing that itunes doesnt store your IP address.
    Im sure it would be impossible to track you down when you come up with 300 winners. So go ahead....you'll be fine.

    1. Re:Good Thing... by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Except you can only get 200 free songs and can only enter 10 a day. Not to mention that you have to give them a credit card to sign up to download.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    2. Re:Good Thing... by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

      But who's to say these 300 winners aren't legitimate?

  97. so smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, what next? Should we all send 99 cent micropayments to the genius who found a way to corrupt the process?

    I'll bet my 99 cents there will be no more free music promotions like this. What if Apple and Pepsi have to cancel it due to these fraudulent "winning" number submissions? Who wins?

    1. Re:so smart. by TeddyR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that they are NOT fraudulent numbers. They are REAL tops from REAL bottles.

      The only difference might be in that the ODDS are that the person winning IS going to redeem it...

      --

      --
      Time is on my side
  98. Pepsi Points by stylee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few years ago pepsi did their pepsi points promotion. Several of us were living in DC at the time in an apartment behind the home of a couple that drove catering trucks to construction sites. They were a nice couple and let us take anything we wanted off the trucks each night while they were loading them for the next days deliveries.

    We did this same thing back then and saved up thousands of those pepsi points in a matter of weeks. Unfortunatley, I never cashed in as the points were pooled amongst us in the apartment and I had to move soon after. I did gain almost 20 pounds while living there for only a few months.

    --
    I swear PowerPoint is going to be the downfall of higher education in western society.
  99. Crack?!? by El · · Score: 1

    I think the only crack here is the stuff the writers of this article were smoking?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  100. bottlecap fun. by b0ycheese · · Score: 1

    i used to do this all the time when pepsi had a promotion where you could get free pepsi by getting a winning bottlecap and i worked at a store that sold bottles of pepsi. it was incredibly easy, and i turned one winning bottle into about 10 free bottles.

  101. Re:Great Way to Go Slahsdot Give into the Media Hy by AvengerXP · · Score: 1

    But i like to download something that someone else legitimately owns is that a bad thing?

    --
    Trolls dont like to be Flamebait, because they burn so well. Protect our Troll heritage!
  102. I love the first drawing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    with the arrow saying "Look." Damn, without that arrow, I'd have looked at the wrong end of the bottle.

  103. Yeaaah by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 2, Troll

    Like there are really iTunes bottlecaps out there. I've been checking daily at different gas stations, and at least once a week at grocery stores. I haven't seen a single lid.

    /sucks being in New Mexico

    1. Re:Yeaaah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /sucks being in New Mexico

      And you needed an iTunes promotion to tell you that?

  104. Mountain Dew Givaway by returnoftheyeti · · Score: 4, Funny

    I got hooked on Dew back in 99 or so when you could win a free pop (soda) in the cap. I worked in a gas station and had nothing to do but go through the stock room and tilt the bottles to look under the cap and see WINNER. Then I would just open the bottle, drink and turn in the cap when I was done. I had like 5 cases that were exclusivly winners that never made it on to the regular sales floor.

    1. Re:Mountain Dew Givaway by dewhite · · Score: 1

      OMG - I knew it. That's what I _never_ win at those games...

      --
      -dewhite
    2. Re:Mountain Dew Givaway by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I got hooked on Dew...

      So, the promotion worked then?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  105. Re:Not a crack. It is a cheat. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    I assume this is sarcastic? It may actually work, i'm not sure.... I have a sony digicam that i modded to be X-Ray, maybe it can see thru soda :) i wonder how store employees would reat to my taking pictures of every soda bottle in the store....

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  106. Right now... by AsmordeanX · · Score: 3, Funny

    359 7-11 employees are going through their Pepsi stock and taking out all the winners.

    1. Re:Right now... by Knight55 · · Score: 1
      I worked at McDonalds before and somehow we we're always short on fry boxes and soda cups around the contest time

      Only seemed to be the large size too...

      --
      1888 Franklin St.
  107. Re:I swear.... by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    The premise of the grandparent post was that someone could nick the code without buying te bottle. However false that might be in reality, if that were the case then the method I described would put a pretty swift end to it.

    Or did you not actually read the post you replied to?
    =Smidge=

  108. Profit by blackmonday · · Score: 1, Funny

    Step 1: Enter Supermarket
    Step 2: Go to Soda Aisle
    Step 3: Tip Pepsi, grab winners
    Step 4: Unscrew Caps and stick in pocket
    Step 5: Log on to ebay.com
    Step 6: ??????
    Step 7: Profit!

  109. Looking at the diagram... by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... (Here) I am concerned that either Pepsi's formula has become much more syruppy, or someone is screwing around with the gravity near MacMerc's headquarters.

  110. Re:Not a crack. It is a cheat. by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    It was a hypothetical. I have no idea if it would work. There is also a lot of distortion from the plastic bottle which you would need to compensate for.

  111. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Steps to get a clue
    1. Go to local video store
    2. Rent "A Christmas Story"
    3. Go back home
    4. Watch "A Christmas Story"
    5. Realize how incomplete your life was until now.

  112. Re:Don't MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you speak H4X0R?
    Have you ever seen the movie A Christmas Story?

    If you can answer yes to both of those questions (see also the parent parent post about a decoder ring) than you should get the joke.

  113. if you don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    either watch A Christmas Story (recommended) or learn to read leetspeak (not recommended).

  114. Re:I swear.... by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 0, Troll

    Jailarity insues.

    Take your farkisms back to Fark with the other AOL noobs. It's encouraged to RTFA, it's not a trap. ;)

  115. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    MOD PARENT UP +5 Fucking Idiot...

  116. Actually, it's 10 digits by Otto · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, it's 10 digits, not 8. And yes, they use both zero (0) and the letter O. The zero's are more elongated vertically, and the O's are actually slightly elongated horizontally. Therefore there's about 10^36 possible codes.

    Winning caps look like this (fake number, obviously):

    12345
    ABCDE

    ONE FREE
    SONG

    Centered. The blank line is actually about half a line.

    Losers look like this:

    PLAY

    AGAIN

    Simple enough. If you hold it up so that the yellow cap is facing the light, yes, you can peer down the side and make out enough to tell which is which, especially on the Sierra Mist bottles. The Pepsi bottles are harder, but since that foul stuff is undrinkable anyway, stick to the clear drinks.

    Note, I have not tried this in a store. I have, however, won a few songs on Sierra Mist bottles.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Actually, it's 10 digits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Therefore there's about 10^36 possible codes.

      You have that backwards.

      There are 36^10 possible codes.

      Which is 3.7E15. A much lower (but still very big) number.

  117. Re:TUBGIRL -- MOD PARENT DOWN by TKinias · · Score: 1

    scripsit Str8Dog:

    what are you drunk?

    Looks like someone's out to burn your karma, amigo. Check your freaks list recently?

    --
    In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  118. I'll one up that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u say:

    Easier still: "try again" caps have 3 lines of printing, centered. Winning caps have 4 lines and fill pretty much the whole space. You don't even have to make out the words, just avoid the caps with a fair bit of whitespace at the edges."

    i say:

    Easier still: Lookk t many. The winning ones are the few that look different; the losing ones are the majority. Simply be able to distingish:

    SIMLAR OR DIFFERENT

    1. Re:I'll one up that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded?

  119. This is the standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bartenders always open your bottle in Brazil, independent if there is a prize or not.

    I remember as a kid going to restaurants and asking for caps for promotions like this, and they always gave me.

    I am pretty sure if the consumer would ask for the cap, the waiter/bartender would give him.

    1. Re:This is the standard by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Yes they always open it, but they usually leave the cap sitting there. They NEVER put the cap in their pocket, unless there is a chance of winning R$1,000,000.

      The entire country was obsessed with the game. It was on the news all the time and was a frequent topic of conversation.

  120. In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compensation lawyers are rubbing their hands with glee tonight, as another golden goose comes home to roost.

    Several thousand viewers of the reality television show "I'm a washed-up old has-been, get me the f**k out of here, you c**t" were left without pictures last night after a prank went horribly wrong.

    "I will be emotionally scarred for life," lamented 23-year old single mother of four Evan Spratsky, one of the viewers whose evening was ruined by the stunt. "This incident must be worth a hundred million do llars at least."

    An amateur hacker -- using software he downloaded from the Internet -- was able to turn his own computer, connected through the Internet through a television cable, into a web site in his own home. With the help of a program called "Apache" -- intended strictly for industrial use by Internet Service Providers -- the young brainbox rigged up the hoax web site, which purported to tell the secret of obtaining free music downloads from the Apple iTunes music store.

    Unfortunately, the joke backfired when news of the site was taken seriously and posted on an internet "bulletin board". As thousands of readers signed in and read their e-mail, they "surfed" across to the illegal web site, causing a fatal overload.

    Thanks to a technology called "ADSL", or "broadband", computer signals -- which would normally be converted to sounds that can be transmitted over a telephone line -- can be transmitted over telephone or television cables at much higher speeds. This is possible because ADSL operates on much higher frequencies than the human ear can hear.

    But the cables are only designed to handle a small amount of traffic at any given time -- not thousands of connections. An important piece of equipment in a street junction box failed under the strain, setting off a chain reaction. An eye-witness said that he saw a series of junction boxes erupt in showers of sparks. The anonymous grey-haired male -- obviously severely traumatised by what he had seen -- then attempted to hug our reporter and burst forth with a series of obscenities, before tripping over, vomiting up some foul-smelling liquid sick and collapsing on the floor.

    And the joke?

    The so-called "winning secret" involved tipping the bottle to read the writing inside the bottle cap.

  121. Bad programming by Trinition · · Score: 1

    YEah, this is off topic, but come on... can't someone catch the error that the connectionf ailed and print a more reasonable error message? I go to countless slashdotted site only to find half-rendered pages terminated with some form of a MySQL connectionf ailure due to a connection limit. Or, hell, why nto try upping the limits since the web server is obvisouly still alive enough to serve back the page. Surely even the most simplistic DB caching should be able to cope with the highly redundant request it would see from a slashdotted link.

  122. Re:Great Way to Go Slahsdot Give into the Media Hy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have, once, Monster Magnet CD scrached to shit, and my copys were in Real Player format.

  123. Randomness not cheap! by phliar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why should it be a joke? Sometimes you really want random numbers, not some PRNG. If you can't afford to (or don't wnat to) buy a hardware-based random number generator this is a good second-best. A couple of decades ago you bought books of random numbers, now you get a CD.

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    1. Re:Randomness not cheap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of decades ago you bought books of random numbers

      No, I didn't buy them - YOU did, dumbass.

  124. Where are they? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    I've been to 3 gas stations in the last couple days and haven't found itunes Pepsi's at any of them. Anyone not in a major city see these yet?

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  125. They're gonna be SOOOO PISSED! by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    Yeah they're gonna be soooooooo pissed when they find out some guy in Utah downloaded 300 songs with those winner caps, yeah they're gonna forget the fact that the person with the caps probably just bought 300 bottles of pepsi.

  126. I love the last statement by peter_gzowski · · Score: 2, Funny

    You might find it easiest to practice while not in the store. Just buy a few and take them home. Get the knack for the angle, and it isn't that hard to pull off without looking like a huge tool.

    Yeah, for that you need a website about it...

    --
    "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  127. yesterdays news.. by basslineshift · · Score: 2, Funny

    We used to do that back in Jr. High when you used to get free Mtn Dews from the under bottlecaps. We'd Tilt, Look, pick a winner and then open it and bring the cap up to the register.. viola.. free soda.

    : ]

  128. I CAN'T BELIEVE... by bfg9000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that this hard-hitting piece of "journalism" made Slashdot's *front page*. I mean, I understand -- slow news day and all, and, well, Slashdot's front page was never a real "exclusive club" in the first place.... "Try to read the cap and see if you've won before you buy the Pepsi." That's it. THAT made the front page. He even put pictures for the, shall we say, "less intellectually fortunate" among the Mac faithful. What's next, "shake your Christmas present and maybe you can tell what's inside?" How about "Check your fruit for bruises BEFORE you buy it to avoid getting bruised fruit!"? GENIUS, I tell you, SHEER GENIUS. Yes, Bobby, "Genius" as in "Genius Bar". I bet Apple's already looking for this Einstein's number as we speak. But they'll have to beat NASA to him! He's like the guy off Phenomenon, I wonder if he can learn Spanish in a half hour. Frickin' Brilliant. I hope he uses his powers for Good, not Evil. Hey, I'm not kidding. He managed to make Slashdot's FRONT PAGE. The FreeBSD guys could cure cancer with their ass and they wouldn't make the front page.

    Why do the Editors even *bother* with apple.slashdot.org when something this fundamentally NON-earth-shakingly important (ie remember that credo "Stuff that Matters"?) makes the front page? SLASHDOT is now apple.slashdot.org. Get it? Slashdot = Apple. Everything NON-Apple seems secondary. Linux stories are tolerated. Books are ignored. YRO is buried. Games are irrelevant.

    You know, I used to think the guys who say "the Slashdot Editors are on Apple's payroll" and that "Apple is astroturfing here" were crazy. Now, I'm starting to believe it. Or has the definition of "stuff that matters" changed fundamentally since Apple is involved?

    Either the editors are slipping or they have an agenda. Take your pick. I like cheating as much as the next guy, but this doesn't deserve front page coverage. I guess that's why I'm not an editor. I'd be fair, I speak in full sentences, and my spelling is adequate. Hell, right there my chances are shot.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    1. Re:I CAN'T BELIEVE... by Cska+Sofia · · Score: 1
      SLASHDOT is now apple.slashdot.org. Get it? Slashdot = Apple. Everything NON-Apple seems secondary. Linux stories are tolerated. Books are ignored. YRO is buried. Games are irrelevant.

      In the past week...

      apple: 4 stories
      books: 3 stories
      yro: 21 stories
      games: 31 stories

  129. just stupid by SteveXE · · Score: 2, Funny

    if people need a website to figure this out we have problems, me and my friends were doing this with free cokes when we were 12 without any help. Whoever made that has too much time on their hands and more so then any other geek they need to GO OUTSIDE!

  130. nerds and Mt Dew by Isca · · Score: 1
    I stopped reading when they insulted both nerds and MT dew in the same sentence.

    Your first task is to find a store that has the coveted sugar water. Just look for the yellow caps. Diet Pepsi, Pepsi and Sierra Mist all have them, and some [surely single] nerds claim select Mountain Dew bottles do as well.

  131. Vagabonds and Scoundrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Every time you download a high-quality ogg or mp3 for free from p2p or better sources, you save $0.99 off an ITMS purchase.

    Every time your convenience-store friend lets you fill up your personal cup with soda at no charge, you save $0.79 on a Pepsi purchase.

    Never underestimate the resourcefulness of law school students.

    And we did it...just like that
    When we want something and
    We don't wanna pay for it
    We walk right
    Through the door
    We walk right through the door

    1. Re:Vagabonds and Scoundrels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And every time you're sued by the RIAA and have to settle by paying them $20,000.00 for being part of a p2p network that "shares" copyrighted material, you lose $20,000.00!

      File "sharers" are just waiting to be royally screwed. Do you really think they don't know who you are? Do you really think they won't make you pay when the time is right for *them*?

  132. Well, how about this, then?... by SpotBug · · Score: 1


    I live in Pennsylvania where food, including pop (soda), isn't taxed.

    This creates the following situation for me and my fellow Pennsylvanians:

    I can spend $1.05 ($0.99 + $0.06 tax) on a song from the iTunes Music Store
    or
    I can spend $1.03 (there's no tax) on a song-winning Pepsi from my local Wal-Mart

    $1.03 is less than $1.05

    --
    cygnuhchur
    1. Re:Well, how about this, then?... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      You live in Pennsylvania and you say "pop"?

      Pennsylvania has some interesting food laws.

      How about the one where if stores give you gift cases or other things with liquor, they can't charge more for them?

      So you have a bottle of vodka sitting on the shelf, and a bottle of vodka in a gift case or with a mixer or something next to it for exactly the same price...

  133. hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I drink Coke, you insensitive clod!

  134. Oops! by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    Doh! You're right. My mistake.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  135. This Works - spoiling it for everyone by acomj · · Score: 1

    I've seen co-workers doing this.. It works. Although its not as easy to see through the plastic. You kinda have to try looking through the blurry plastic to see.

    Course now they'll fix it...

  136. I'm not a gravitational expert but.. by jamonterrell · · Score: 2, Funny

    If holding the bottle at 25 degrees is so important, and they're showing the angle verses the line of horizon, shouldn't the soda in the bottle be parallel to the line of horizon? I mean, I'm not by any means as mathematically and engineering-ly inclined to come up with such a "brilliant" way of peaking into soda bottles in convenience stores to get free music, but I think I could have at least figured that part out.

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
    1. Re:I'm not a gravitational expert but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The soda is always parallel to the horizon. Unless you suspend gravity.

    2. Re:I'm not a gravitational expert but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The soda is always parallel to the horizon. Unless you suspend gravity.

      Or fail to keep the bottle still.

  137. Re:Not a crack. It is a cheat. by rixstep · · Score: 1

    this is certainly a simple cheat

    Cheat? All he's doing is tilting the bottle!

    Unbelievable - and while I'm at it:

    'Don't look at the MS source code, Marion!

  138. MOD MY PARNET DOWN -5 STUPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's true!

  139. My, you're unlucky :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've already won 4 without even trying.

  140. none here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There aren't even ANY Pepsi bottles here in CT with this promotion on them.

  141. Thank you, Capitain Obvious! by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Tommorow on Capitain Obvious: How to tell it's a slow news day without going past the front page of Shashdot!

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  142. Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kepler's mom was a witch.

    1. Re:Troll by jvonk · · Score: 1

      ...but imagine what she could do in bed with that.

  143. Buying coke to win iTMS songs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    7-11 have Big Gulp cups with the iTMS promotion. I have yet to actually purchase a Pepsi or related beverage with this promotion, sticking to the Coke side. Of course so far I'm 1 in 11 with said cups and fearful of being sued by the RIAA....

    1. Re:Buying coke to win iTMS songs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. I'm 6 for 7 this week and 12 for 27 overall with the 7-Eleven cups. Sucks to be you!

  144. You can do it with all the promotions by jazzykindaguy · · Score: 1

    I've been doing that for years, especially with the sprite promotions. You can hold the bottle up to the light and look right through the other side of the cap since the sprite is clear. Even if you can't see the actual words, you can always tell if you've won by the pattern it makes. You can bring an extra cap in and keep getting more and more free sprite until you're arms are full:D

  145. What prevents artists from buying their own songs? by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't be too hard to get into iTunes as a registered artist, redeem the winning caps and get free Pepsi. Add some caps harvesting and you could probably collect a healthy sum of dollars too.

    Sounds too obvious to me, there is probably something wrong in my reasoning... I guess.

    Maybe RIAA could get some cash inflow this way so that they don't have to sue kiddies? ;)

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  146. Sculley: FEH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just out of high school, I worked for apple as a phone jockey/dope in the thick of the Sculley era. Every single day my job consisted of taking desperate (to the point of suicidal) calls from these poor, pathetic bureaucrats in the purchasing departments at school districts who had sent their entire computer hardware budget to Apple some six, eight, 12, 18 months ago, and they had still not received their orders.

    We were told explicitly and with great threat that we were never to reveal this to the customer, and were in fact to continue to feed them the "Real Soon Now" line of bullshit ("Next week, I promise... It's shipping tomorrow... It already shipped..."), when the blunt reality was that they would not be receiving their orders the next week, month, four months, six months, EVER - eventual refunds were assumed, amounting to a zero-interest loan from the school districts to Apple - because Apple had in fact shipped every one of their orders overseas, to be sold at a higher markup in foreign retail. They had sold their standing inventory at least twice, and probably several times more, and only actually delivered it to the highest bidder. It was pathetic.

    Mind you, "profitability" of Apple aside, this was the height of the "MacInTrash" era, when every government department in the United States, outside of the toniest school districts, was replacing their entire IT infrastructure of Apples with cheap first-generation beige boxes running some godawful proof-of-concept "Windows." I vividly recall watching newscasts showing dumpsters overflowing with discarded Apple machines and thinking to myself, "this company is fucked."

    Sculley made Apple "profitable" for the X many months it took him to ruin its reputation and forever doom it to the statistically irrelevant fringe market.

  147. Fill to the brim, pepsi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's what pepsi gets for not filling the bottle to the brim

    too bad the technique doesn't apply to those cereal boxes that always come half-empty

  148. Contests gone bad.. by nolife · · Score: 1

    Reading a tilted cap is nothing new but does anyone remember in 1996 when McDonalds had the Disney trivia game pieces? Every card could be a winner if you scratched off only the right answer to a Disney related question. You recieved two of the game pieces with a supersized meal. It wasn't long before usenet posts and web pages[1] dedicated to the game answers were online. Lucky for McDonlads, not many people were online then or this may have turned into another 84 Olympics game piece fiasco for them.

    [1] I tried posting links to web sites that had the answers but they are all 404 now. I guess that specific information is not really useful 8 years later ;)

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  149. way to pay Pepsi back for its support... by fitten · · Score: 1

    So, Pepsi came out and basically sided against the RIAA in a way, so a bunch of guys pay them back by screwing their contest over. Way to make friends and get support for yourselves. Since the thing is hosted on SourceForge, it will be associated with OSS and the OSS community.

    Great going guys.

    1. Re:way to pay Pepsi back for its support... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since the thing is hosted on SourceForge, it will be associated with OSS and the OSS community."
      I didn't know SourceForge was hosting a page that tells you to tip the Pepsi bottles at an angle so you can see under the lid...

  150. Attitudes would be better than hounds, for sure!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously though, I wouldn't call you a
    looser, so drop the extra o on Losing the attitude.

  151. Duh by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

    My sister and I have been using this method to get free sodas every time one of the soft drink makers have a promotion. She "cracked" the soft drink solution about 9 years ago. Hundreds of free drinks later, we've saved a couple of hundred dollars.

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
    1. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the thousands of dollars for diabetes medication later in life.

  152. Free Tibet With Every Purchase by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1
    It's a follow-up to the old "Free Mumia With Purchase of Second Mumia of Equal or Lesser Value" promotion.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  153. ROTFLMAO!!! Now THAT was funny :) hehehehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly, just silly LOL F'n Hilarious :)

  154. Possibly better than store bought hardware by tqft · · Score: 1

    One idea I have seen toyed with is to the universe itself as a random number generator. I may have picked the idea up somewhere on the 'net a long time ago.

    Specifically the microwave background radiation.

    Point microwave receiver at the (night?) sky, record appropriately. You need to make each channel wide enough to get the appropriate number of bits per second, and enough channels to get enough bits. If you want a huge number of bits at a large bitrate you may run out of resource.

    You need to check against local source contamination.

    Secure against intentional and design flaw.

    Note the anistropy in the background microwave radiation will not affect this as you have to take in all the sky, not just a small patch to pick this up.

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
    1. Re:Possibly better than store bought hardware by BuilderBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The idea isn't a new one. The NSA (and I dare say the KGB and GCHQ) have been using cosmic background radiation to generate their one-time-pads.

      You can apparently get software for your email. (Not sure about 2048 bits being stronger than military though, they have bigger guns :)

      A simple FM radio, tuned away from a station, would generate suitable data.

      BB

  155. What's your body mass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serious..... Switch to nothing but bottled water
    for 4 days and I'll be very surprised if you're
    still as enthusiastic about soda.

  156. Steve's own kids by Cinematique · · Score: 1

    Maybe off-topic, but isn't it somewhat hypocritical that Jobs won't let his kids drink pop, yet he has no problem running a promotion via Pepsi?

    It's like a parent who doesn't want their kids to smoke cigs, but is the president of a major tobacco company...

    1. Re:Steve's own kids by Geccoman · · Score: 1

      Not the same, IMO.

      Jobs doesn't own Pepsi, first of all. Jobs doesn't require you to drink Pepsi to get songs. You can buy them online with no soda obligation. Also, he isn't the only decision maker at Apple. Even if he HAS an objection, he's not going to speak up about it, and I bet Pepsi made the deal pretty sweet for Apple.

      --
      I'm on a chair.
  157. Pepsi: Random or not? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    However, given that it is not random, I guess the odds are much better.

    I would expect that it is random. There doesn't seem to be much reason not to have the codes be random.

    I can randomly generate a vast quantity of numbers and dump them in a database somewhere, and mark one as "used" every time someone turns in a cap. (Actually, Pepsi probably already does the database thing just to take advantage of customer data.)

    There's no reason to have a mechanism like "if the third letter is "L", the bottle is a winner". That sort of thing was popular back in the day when isolated systems existed (like computers with software with serial numbers not on the 'Net and unconnected credit card-using systems). Today, there's no reason for it.

  158. New Coke predates Crystal Pepsi by gumpish · · Score: 1
    Crystal Pepsi was the only good Pepsi ever. It tasted like Coke. And it was a good thing, too, since at that time, Coke was trying to pass New Coke off as the real thing.
    New Coke debuted in 1985

    Crystal Pepsi appeared in 1992

    Thanks for playing.

    (You are right about Crystal Pepsi being a quality beverage. I just wish Coca-Cola would bring back OK soda.)
  159. cheating to get downloaded music legally?!? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    ok, please explain this: you're cheating so you can download music legally, instead of just downloading illegal p2p music. Anyone see a conflict there? At least the artist gets paid, but I think there's still a small moral issue to deal with whether you download illegal or cheat to download legally.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:cheating to get downloaded music legally?!? by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      It's not cheating.
      It's taking advantage of a flaw.
      Cheating is when you change the rules or play of the game to suit your needs, such as moving chess peices when your opponent is not looking or dealing cards from the bottom of the deck(or your sleeve).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  160. Suicidal Tendencies! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    Oh GOD, the memories of being a fifteen-year-old street-roaming punk of a geek!

    I just really did ROFLOL.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  161. Didn't anyone ever tell you...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CD tray is designed to hold the *whole* bottle (or cup, if you prefer).

  162. Not as easy as the article makes it look by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I went out and tried this tonight after work, and ended up purchasing eight bottles that are all winners. (Oddly enough, most of the bottles in one of the cooler weren't...I went through a dozen and only found two. But when I moved to another cooler, every single yellow-capped bottle I checked was.)

    But it's not as easy as the article makes it look. Due to the ribbing around the neck of the bottle, the view can be pretty easily distorted and reflections from overhead light can get in the way, especially if there's condensation or fingerprint smears on the bottle already. I suspect that carrying a small penlight to shine through would improve visibility.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
  163. Obvious design flaw by medazinol · · Score: 1

    Sorry but I just HAVE to chime in here :) If Apple designed the bottles you probably would not be able to cheat in this manner. They'd just make all the bottles opaque with an aluminum-like finish with lots of little holes in them...

  164. REAL Pepsi drinkers can't do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a regular Pepsi drinker, you're buying your normal beverage of choice at your normal price and getting a song to boot.

    Define "regular". If I was a regular Pepsi drinker, I wouldn't be buying one-off bottles at the expensive stores (ie, the ones I can inspect easily); I'd be buying them by the flat at Costco or equivalent for a lot cheaper. I guess with some time and privacy at Costco I could pull this off also though.

  165. mathematics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually your (the parent poster's) uid is 1/10th of his (the grandparent poster's). but who's checking anyways.

  166. This is news? by Pingsmoth · · Score: 1

    I was using this trick to get free bottles of Mountain Dew when I was stocking milk at the grocery store back in high school. How, pray tell, did this end up on Slashdot?

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
  167. Serves em right! by euxneks · · Score: 1

    They should be putting more pepsi in those bottles! Gippin' us of our precious sugary water goodness.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  168. ITunes are hideously overpriced... this deal sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who believes that a buck a song is a deal is being scammed. There are many cheaper, legal foreign mp3 sites. Why waste your money up front on sugar water? The song is only worth 5 cents on a less hyped mp3 site. http://www.museekster.com/clubmp3searchinfo.htm

  169. 1 in 6 my friend by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Except that you forget..its a 1 in 6 chance of winning. so the odds that he bought 300 Pepsi's and won 300 times is not to likely. Conversely, it is also unlikely that he would have bought the1800 Pepsi's in order to come up with 300 winners. Either way, a red flag would go off.

  170. Take the fucking cap off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least, thats what we did as kids when we wanted to win a free soda.

  171. what am I missing? by atrader42 · · Score: 1

    I checked your calculation and it more or less works out (though it should be 104857600 Kb, since we're talking gigabytes), so then I checked mine-102400 MB @ ~1MB/min=102400/60/24=71.11.

    1. Re:what am I missing? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      but we're NOT talking Gigabytes, as he used a lowercase 'b'.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  172. kilobit or kilobyte? by pwarf · · Score: 2, Informative

    128 kilobits a second. (I just checked file details on winamp to make sure).

    So your result is short by a factor of 8. Multiply 9.04 by 8 and you get about the right amount.

    The bit-byte confusion is nearly as bad as the chem/physics calorie versus the nutritional Calorie. The chem/physics calorie is amount of energy needed to raise one gram of water one degree Celsius. The nutritional Calorie (note uppercase C) is amount of energy needed to raise one kilogram one degree. Makes for confusing conversations occasionally.

    1. Re:kilobit or kilobyte? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      MY result isn't short, as I don't suffer from an inability to distinguish between uppercase and lowercase 'b's.

      b=bit
      B=byte

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:kilobit or kilobyte? by jedrek · · Score: 1

      Here in Poland, all the labels use kcal (kilocalorie) to clear up the confusion.

    3. Re:kilobit or kilobyte? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, you ARE too stupid to understand the context of the original message, which obviously meant GB.

    4. Re:kilobit or kilobyte? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      obviously - why do you think I posted, dimwit?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  173. oh boy. by agentq · · Score: 1

    Someone else (not a rabid Mac fan like myself) already taught me this.

    Here's the kick for me: I'm a univeristy student. A freshman at that. Part of our freshman dining deal is something called Dining Dollar$ (that horrible, horrible $/S substitution should give away which school I go to to any of my fellows) which I can use to buy as much Pepsi as I can possibly consume. As a freshman, I'm forced to get DD'$ as part of my meal plan. So, I get a guaranteed winner, and subsequently convert my Dining Dollar$ (...) which I barely use (I had ~$100 left at the end of last semester) into music. Go me.

  174. bob@techbase.ch by don_da_bob · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    hate me, but i need some spam bob@techbase.ch SPAM ME: bob@techbase.ch

  175. Really... by kitzilla · · Score: 1
    ...Apple probably doesn't care if you cheat. They just want you to develop buying patterns by visiting the iTunes store.

    Pepsi probably *does* care. I'm shocked they were dumb enough to print directly on the inside of the cap.

    The Pepsi Generation is apparently a pack of freeloading, self-entitled thieves. Groovy.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  176. tooth damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A popular theme running through the earlier posts was about how Pepsi rots the teeth, yada yada yada, and somebody is almost certain to have mentioned an age-old experiment involving placing a human tooth in a sample of fizzy drink for several days and observing damage to the enamel. This is commonly held as "proof" that fizzy drinks -- which, lest anyone forget, are in contact with the teeth for a matter of seconds at most before being carried away to the stomach -- damage the teeth.

    It is, however, rarely mentioned what happens when a similar experiment is performed using a quantity of apple juice in lieu of the fizzy cola. Interested readers are urged to find out for themselves.

  177. Pepsi bottles were Silver in Australia by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    Actually, they covered the tipping/clear bottle decryption routine here in Australia with a recent competition (not sure what it was for, I just remember the bottles).

    Instead of having clear PET bottles of Pepsi, they made them from PET injected with silver colouring, making them opaque and therefore unable to be tipped to see what the cap said.

    Simple solution to a simple problem, and the bottles actually stood out as an added bonus on the shelves.

  178. Use the right notation! by Larry+David · · Score: 1

    Byte is capitalized (B). Bit is not capitalized (b).

    100GB = 100,000,000KB (by SI usage - not the typical computer science definition)

    128Kb per second = 16KB per second.

    100,000,000 / 16 / 60 / 60 / 24 = 72 days 8 hours 6 minutes and 43.2 seconds.

    If you chose to use Mebibytes and Gibibytes (SI units for traditional computer usage of MB and GB) it would work out as:

    100GiB = 107,374,182.4 KB

    107,374,182.4 / 16 / 60 / 60 / 24 = 77 days 16 hours 8 minutes and 6.4 seconds.

    Either way, not 71 days in any case, unless you were using VBR.

    1. Re:Use the right notation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah now let's see you calculate how much Pepsi you would have to drink (or pour down the drain) to fill an entire empty iPod with music. Assuming the rate is one song per 3 20 oz. bottles.

  179. Re:Sculley: FEH. by pacc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sculley made Apple "profitable" for the X many months it took him to ruin its reputation and forever doom it to the statistically irrelevant fringe market.

    It must be hard to move to a business where you actually have to make the things you sell at a cost as opposed to just fill another bottle with sugar, spice and water and use all money on advertising.

  180. This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it really possible that people didn't know you
    could tilt the bottle? Me and my friends used to
    get perpetual soda like that when we were like
    10 years old (`91). Oh, and I just wanted to see
    myself talking.

  181. Walmart adding sleeves to the bottles... by adzoox · · Score: 1

    One of my local Walmarts has already added sleeves to the tops of each bottle.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Walmart adding sleeves to the bottles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell does Wal*Mart care if a Pepsi/Apple promotion goes somewhat awry?

      Oh, silly me. I forgot Wal*Mart deems themselves to be Amerika's morality police, preventing thoughtcrime by refusing to develop pictures which show objectionable bodyparts, and refusing to sell music which describes sex or violence. Obviously they would want to prevent people from committing the horribly immoral act of cheating a fellow megacorporation out of a few sales of non-winning bottles.

  182. Obligatory quote.... by todesengel · · Score: 1

    "Free Tibet? I'll take it! Hello China? I have something you want. But it's gonna cost you. That's right... All the tea."

  183. That's fine but, by fgb · · Score: 1

    What do I do with the contents of the bottle once I've gotten the bottle cap. It's not like you can drink the stuff...

  184. Pepsinomics 101 by Pergau · · Score: 1

    Isn't it just Pepsi being too mean to fill the bottles sufficiently to stop you seeing the cap. A few CCs extra Sugar/Water and you wouldn't be able to cheat.

  185. Awesome.... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

    This is excellent.... I want to get some Beatles songs off iTunes. Only thing is, I need to drink like 30 Pepsi bottles to buy all the songs I want...

    1. Re:Awesome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with those Beatles songs on iTunes. Let us know how it works out for you.

  186. HUH??? by DOCStoobie · · Score: 1

    Let me see, crack a contest to win free music, or maximize my Kazaa again and search for it..... Kazaa is quicker....

  187. What specially marked bottles? by 5+time+champ · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any of the specially bottles of Pepsi, Diet Pepsi & Sierra Mist at my favorite retailers. And I live in a major Midwestern metropolitan area. Oh well, I much prefer that nectar of the gods--Coca Cola.

  188. Re:ITunes are hideously overpriced... this deal su by filmcritic · · Score: 0

    You fucking asshole...how stupid are you? Your little 5 cent song is nothing compared to the $20 charge for dowloading....Considering Russia has some of the highest entertainment piracy rates in the world, don't kid yourself into thinking that horrid site is legal.

    Just go BUY your music from a legit store like EVERYONE used to do before MP3.

    Oh, WMA9 is way superior to shitty MP3...yet another example of Windows' superior quality.

  189. Obligatory Mr. Cola ufie reference by multimed · · Score: 1

    http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19991130& mode=classic

    --
    Vote Quimby.
  190. By the MPAA's Standards.... by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    That's pretty amusing but did the editors actually read this story before posting it? "Next step: a Pepsi/iTMS winning number generator!"

    Hey, by Hollywood's standards, that's full-on "crypto-hacking." That's only one step away from using your Flash-powered Mac laptop to reroute a Pepsi bottling plant's deliveries via a VR accousticly-coupled net uplink to send all the winning bottles to your house.

    Hack the planet!

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  191. How much Pepsi to drink to fill an iPod by Larry+David · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what 'type of gigabytes' Apple use when denoting their players, and I can't be assed to check out their site ;-) So let's assume a typical 20GB iPod is 20,000,000 KB.

    The average song in my collection rattled someplace around 4 minutes last time I checked a couple of years ago, let's assume we're talking more mainstream than that and go for 3:30. So the file size would be 210 seconds * 16 KB/s, for a total of 3360KB per song.

    20,000,000 / 3360 = 5952.381 128KBps songs on an iPod. Then 5952.381 * 3 * 20 liq. ozs. = 357,142.86 liq. ozs. of Pepsi Cola, or 10148.987 liters.

    So, yeah, if you drank 17,858 bottles of Pepsi cola, you could statistically fill your iPod.

    1. Re:How much Pepsi to drink to fill an iPod by System.out.println() · · Score: 1

      That's assuming you don't use this trick. With the trick, you need to drink a mere 5,952 bottles.
      Anyone know the average size of a human bladder so we can calculate the number of times one would have to piss in order to fill their iPod?

  192. Re:I swear.... by Squidgee · · Score: 1
    And yet it's not the case.

    Making you, what, an idiot?

  193. A question by danila · · Score: 1

    Do you think it is possible to use a strong flashlight and try to catch the reflection of the code in the surface of the Pepsi? If yes, the purchase may be made completely unnecessary...

    Can someone please confirm if it is possible?

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  194. Actually, you're both wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there are 10 characters with 36 possibilities for each then it's 36^10, which is "only" ~3.7*10^15 possible combinations, which gives a 3.7*10^7 or 1 in 37 million chance in winning if it's completely random.

    Still a long shot, but not quite as long.

    -Xur (still can't remember my password!)

  195. Pepsi flows uphill by richlb · · Score: 1

    The diagram on the MacMerc website shows the Pepsi at an angle. Don't liquids naturally level?

    1. Re:Pepsi flows uphill by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as gravity, THE EARTH SUCKS!

      --
      I hate sigs.
  196. So where is it? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    So where is the link to the iTunes promo code generator? I'm surprised you guys didn't crack it and post a solution before it came out. :^)

  197. Great... by quantaq · · Score: 1

    They're giving the songs away for FREE, and someone STILL finds a way to steal them!

  198. Thanks for the good reference by tqft · · Score: 1

    Great resource.

    Was pretty sure it wasn't a new idea, but had no idea where I saw it.

    Not sure I am keen on buying the software for it though.

    "A simple FM radio, tuned away from a station, would generate suitable data"
    What about a TV Tuner card in your PC?

    Or

    Plug out from FM radio into soundcard mic jack.

    Mmmmm, software radio extension module?

    --
    The Singularity is closer than you think
    Quant
  199. Re:Great Way to Go Slahsdot Give into the Media Hy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monster Magnet??!? You LISTEN to that shit?? You must be fucking deaf.

  200. 1 in 3 you FUCKING MORON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention that the cap is 200 songs total per person.

    1. Re:1 in 3 you FUCKING MORON by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      fine then 900 pepsi's u queer. im sure youre just the asshole to buy 900 pepsi's in hopes you can save 300 bucks. fucking ass.

  201. Longest $0.99 iTunes Music Store song? by oldsyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So far the longest song I found was
    DJ Shadow - Influx 12:14

    I spent $1.19 on Pepsi which I don't drink just
    to "stick it to the man" in my own small, small way.

    I figure I'd get the most byte for my buck....

    1. Re:Longest $0.99 iTunes Music Store song? by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      You're not trying hard enough -- if you want more minutes of music for your $0.99 (or your bottle cap), try being an Allman Brothers fan.

      Mountain Jam
      33:58
      The Allman Brothers Band
      The Fillmore Concerts
      $0.99

      Whipping Post
      22:53
      The Allman Brothers Band
      At Fillmore East - Deluxe Edition (Live)
      $0.99

      You Don't Love Me/Soul Serenade
      19:25
      The Allman Brothers Band
      The Fillmore Concerts
      $0.99

      Jessica (Live)
      16:07
      The Allman Brothers Band
      An Evening with The Allman Brothers Band
      - 1st Set / 2nd Set / Seven Turns (Box Set)
      $0.99

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
  202. "Always Win iTunes from Pepsi" The Movie by Photo_Designer · · Score: 1

    I wanted to drop a note to let you know about my latest creation. It is a spoof on the Pepsi/iTunes commercial and how to always win at the game.

    Length: 30 sec. This was written for a short film I made on how to always win a free song. You can see the video at http://homepage.mac.com/jimyounkin/iMovieTheater4. html. This song as well as the video are released under the Creative Commons License (cc)2004 Jim Younkin. Share and sample freely! Email me about this song at this email address: fluxdada-sodasong@yahoo.com.

    I Bought Some Soda by Jim Younkin III (y3)


    play hi-bitrate (mp3) (broadband) at MacIdol.

    download hi-bitrate (856.69 KB) at MacIdol.

    My other music is available on MacIdol here.

    -Jim Younkin III

    Lyrics: "I walked up to the Albertsons, I bought some soda and they all won. I bought some soda and they all won. Hi. I'm one of the people that figured out how to get free music at the grocery store and I'm here to say, in front of everybody, what the heck am I gonna do with all this nasty soda?"