I use Waze every time I drive more than 3-5 miles (including my commute, both ways). It's not about not knowing how to get there, it's about knowing in advance where the accident is (if there is one) or whatever else may cause me to want to take an alternate route. 8-9 times out of 10, I drive my standard route, but that 1-2 makes using it every time well worth it.
Something tells me you don't have one. Mine specifically states it is a Concealed Handgun License (this varies by state, of course, but anyone taking the course to get theirs learns some basics about how they vary).
I know I'm feeding a troll, but every sane (and many other) country has legislation regarding accessibility. Someday perhaps you will have a child with a disability. Do you want that child to grow up without access to technology, or do you think those of us with a disabled child should separately fund accessibility features?
Besides (and almost as importantly), just how big is the inconvenience to the 99%? I'd venture it's only inconvenient to a very small subset & now we're looking at a group of people that cannot do without versus the convenience of another small group. Since society as a whole recognizes the need to assist persons with disabilities, perhaps the other small group should fund their own version that is not encumbered.
Finally, either double-check the definition of pander (perhaps you didn't mean what you said), or screw you.
If I read that right(*), they didn't so much target women and children as much as the conditions were so deplorable that people died from easily avoidable circumstances (starvation, disease, etc) and those most vulnerable died in greater numbers (children, etc).
Horrific and inexcusable to be sure, and certainly concentration camps, but really nothing comparing (based on my Wikipedia reading) to the concentration camps of the Nazis. The British weren't seeking to eradicate an entire people.
(*) I was unaware 30 minutes ago of this event in History, so I certainly don't consider myself to be an expert:)
Also games like Drawful use a shared screen while each player uses their own device/screen. I see potential for more games like this, fun at family gatherings.
I may just be feeding a troll here, but if being anti 'drunks doing stupid things that endanger others' makes me anti alcohol in your mind, then in your mind I am anti alcohol. By your logic, I am also anti gun as I am anti 'people doing stupid things that endanger others with their firearms'
Why is it ok to expect people to be responsible for their decisions only part of the time? We all make decisions, hopefully more good than bad. At the end of the day, we're all responsible for the decisions we make (whether we're held responsible at the time or not). I'd add another option to sociocapitalist's above: drink at home where you don't have to travel afterwards (or sleep where you drink, ie a friend's house). But if you drink and drive and hurt someone and I'm on your jury? You're boned.
Slashdot Mirror
Agreed, I suppose there is no reason to toss the baby out with the water (just easier sometimes :) ).
haha, fair point :)
Maybe then we'd get a real conversation going about doing away with the Electoral College?
That explains it. Agreed, no one gets a cookie on my computer past my closing my browser.
And (in my experience) every time you go back, you have to click it again, and next time again, and next time again, etc..
I use Waze every time I drive more than 3-5 miles (including my commute, both ways). It's not about not knowing how to get there, it's about knowing in advance where the accident is (if there is one) or whatever else may cause me to want to take an alternate route. 8-9 times out of 10, I drive my standard route, but that 1-2 makes using it every time well worth it.
Maybe he meant the Arabs?
Also no lawyer, but I think it would be up to Stanford and the webcomic to sue AT&T (and gosh, would I love to see that).
So much for Flash being dead.
Ding ding ding, we have a winner.
All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people.
Something tells me you don't have one. Mine specifically states it is a Concealed Handgun License (this varies by state, of course, but anyone taking the course to get theirs learns some basics about how they vary).
Wouldn't a Linux geek use /. (rather than \.)?
:)
I know I'm feeding a troll, but every sane (and many other) country has legislation regarding accessibility. Someday perhaps you will have a child with a disability. Do you want that child to grow up without access to technology, or do you think those of us with a disabled child should separately fund accessibility features?
Besides (and almost as importantly), just how big is the inconvenience to the 99%? I'd venture it's only inconvenient to a very small subset & now we're looking at a group of people that cannot do without versus the convenience of another small group. Since society as a whole recognizes the need to assist persons with disabilities, perhaps the other small group should fund their own version that is not encumbered.
Finally, either double-check the definition of pander (perhaps you didn't mean what you said), or screw you.
If I read that right(*), they didn't so much target women and children as much as the conditions were so deplorable that people died from easily avoidable circumstances (starvation, disease, etc) and those most vulnerable died in greater numbers (children, etc).
:)
Horrific and inexcusable to be sure, and certainly concentration camps, but really nothing comparing (based on my Wikipedia reading) to the concentration camps of the Nazis. The British weren't seeking to eradicate an entire people.
(*) I was unaware 30 minutes ago of this event in History, so I certainly don't consider myself to be an expert
By not being popular enough to be a problem?
Nope (at least not exclusively ... ) :)
Unless you use Chrome?
Also games like Drawful use a shared screen while each player uses their own device/screen. I see potential for more games like this, fun at family gatherings.
Finally, we will access, disclose and preserve personal data, including your content (such as the content of emails, other private communications or files in private folders), when we have a good faith believe that doing so is necessary ...
Works for Semi trucks ...
I may just be feeding a troll here, but if being anti 'drunks doing stupid things that endanger others' makes me anti alcohol in your mind, then in your mind I am anti alcohol. By your logic, I am also anti gun as I am anti 'people doing stupid things that endanger others with their firearms'
Why is it ok to expect people to be responsible for their decisions only part of the time? We all make decisions, hopefully more good than bad. At the end of the day, we're all responsible for the decisions we make (whether we're held responsible at the time or not). I'd add another option to sociocapitalist's above: drink at home where you don't have to travel afterwards (or sleep where you drink, ie a friend's house). But if you drink and drive and hurt someone and I'm on your jury? You're boned.
For the record, I am very much not anti gun.
I'll admit it, I did - in fact I only noticed I was wrong by reading your post.
...
Crap, forgot to tick 'post anonymously' again
Whew, that's bugged me for 23 years, finally I'll get an answer!
Excuse me, stewardess, I speak Jive