Biodiesel has a very high flash point... Definition of "flammable" being: "easily set on fire" (Oxford American Dictionary), Biodiesel fails that definition, thus meriting the "non-flammable" designation.
In order to get a true statistic, we'll also need to put both groups into 'clean' rooms, and keep the same physical activities and diets between both groups.
Still want to volunteer for the control group?
Um... You/can/ play it off the computer. So you don't actually lose access to the music, you simply can't switch.
And besides that, it's entirely possible to strip the DRM (And they really haven't tried to stop it).
"The internet has seriously helped popularize PCs." Am I talking about "PC's" (no! the apostrophe again!) or am I talking about the the group "PCs" (e.g., Proponents of Cesium)? I guess we'll just have to go home and huddle in the corner.
Um, that's not a problem with lack of an apostrophe--that's a problem with acronyms in general.
Your usage, according to most scholars is incorrect.
Games are not alcohol. Games are not cigarettes. Games are entertainment - the same as novels, movies and television. Regulating the sale of books/movies/TV to minors? Unconstitutional.
They government should easily be able to regulate sales to minors. Explicit content will have just as much of an effect on a person as alcohol or cigarettes will, if not a greater one--the effect will be mental, not physical, that's all. There may not be legal precedent for an action of this sort, but that doesn't mean that it's unconstitutional.
That's not what the word valid means. I understand why it's a bad idea, and I generally use application/xhtml+xml, but that doesn't change the fact that the XHTML spec says that text/html is a valid application type for XHTML documents.
Secondly, you obviously can't use text/html when you're not using a purely [X]HTML document. That's why application/xhtml+mathml (I think that's right...) and kin were invented.
You deserve WAY more mod points for that. That's probably the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. Or maybe it's just the sleep deprivation. Either way, I'm sorry I didn't have the mod points today.
This opinion has already been partially stated, but the way I see it, the sooner we can get IE6 out of the browserscape, the better.
Hopefully, this will be able to rapidly accelerate the removal of screwy CSS-hacked sites, giving a bit higher marketshare to alternate browsers.
iTunes does *not* send information on your local library to their servers - They use previous PURCHASES to determine what shows up in that box. Information that any normal company would collect.
I was under the impression that only href="" would be usable from other tags, not src="". If you're using src="" you're going to need to have an alt="" attribute as well.
No, but as a replacement for the tag, it's very much expected that the images should not be hidden untill a later point. That would destroy layouts without massive use of CSS.
(Also, I made a mistake in my previous post, where things don't make sense use <object>)
Slashdot Mirror
Why on earth would you not count hispanics?
I would mod you up if I happened to have any points. The amount of misuse of the word 'monopoly' in these comments has been appalling.
CSS is not a "flavor-of-the-hour" technology. It's a core part of absolutely any well-formed website.
I thoroughly agree on the rest of your post, however.
Some quick googling says Biodiesel has a flash point of around 300 degrees F. Kerosene and Jet fuel are both in the low-to-mid 100s.
Biodiesel has a very high flash point... Definition of "flammable" being: "easily set on fire" (Oxford American Dictionary), Biodiesel fails that definition, thus meriting the "non-flammable" designation.
Of course it doesn't. Command+Click does. Command takes the place of Ctrl in any windows shortcut on OS X.
One could argue that earth was going to explode tomorrow.
That doesn't make it true.
In order to get a true statistic, we'll also need to put both groups into 'clean' rooms, and keep the same physical activities and diets between both groups. Still want to volunteer for the control group?
Um... You /can/ play it off the computer. So you don't actually lose access to the music, you simply can't switch.
And besides that, it's entirely possible to strip the DRM (And they really haven't tried to stop it).
"For the plural of abbreviations, an apostrophe is widely regarded as incorrect, so CDs is preferable to CD's." Quoth Wikipedia.
That's not what the word valid means. I understand why it's a bad idea, and I generally use application/xhtml+xml, but that doesn't change the fact that the XHTML spec says that text/html is a valid application type for XHTML documents. Secondly, you obviously can't use text/html when you're not using a purely [X]HTML document. That's why application/xhtml+mathml (I think that's right...) and kin were invented.
No, XHTML 1.0 Strict is valid with a text/html header, however, it's not recommended.
He was breaking his own record.
You deserve WAY more mod points for that. That's probably the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. Or maybe it's just the sleep deprivation. Either way, I'm sorry I didn't have the mod points today.
Says who?
The same reason people use Gigabit Ethernet. The point n is not for extra-network protocols, but inter-network ones (For example: VNC)
Also missing is the option for Dual Licensing of your application. GPL and MIT (with a fee), for example.
This opinion has already been partially stated, but the way I see it, the sooner we can get IE6 out of the browserscape, the better. Hopefully, this will be able to rapidly accelerate the removal of screwy CSS-hacked sites, giving a bit higher marketshare to alternate browsers.
iTunes does *not* send information on your local library to their servers - They use previous PURCHASES to determine what shows up in that box. Information that any normal company would collect.
I was under the impression that only href="" would be usable from other tags, not src="". If you're using src="" you're going to need to have an alt="" attribute as well.
No, but as a replacement for the tag, it's very much expected that the images should not be hidden untill a later point. That would destroy layouts without massive use of CSS.
(Also, I made a mistake in my previous post, where things don't make sense use <object>)
How does IE plan to support XHTML 2.0 if the is going to require a click to be viewed?
For those less-informed about XHTML 2, will be replacing