Slashdot Mirror


Pi Recited to 100,000 Digits

DiAmOnDirc writes "Akira Haraguchi, 60, needed more than 16 hours to recite the number to 100,000 decimal places, breaking his personal best of 83,431 digits set in 1995, his office said Wednesday. He made the attempt at a public hall in Kisarazu, just east of Tokyo. Haraguchi, a psychiatric counselor and business consultant in nearby Mobara city, took a break of about 5 minutes every one to two hours, going to the rest room and eating rice balls during the attempt, said Naoki Fujii, spokesman of Haraguchi's office. Fujii said all of Haraguchi's activities during the attempt, including his bathroom breaks, were videotaped for evidence that will later be sent for verification by the Guinness Book of Records."

335 comments

  1. Details by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More to the point (although you could infer it from the "newsworthiness" of the story): he did it from memory. Although I'd be surprised if anyone had ever even read out 100,000 digits of Pi but, then again, I've been surprised by stupid people. Also from the article, "In 2002, University of Tokyo mathematicians, aided by a supercomputer, set the world record for figuring out pi to 1.24 trillion decimal places." So:

    a) He's got a way to go; and
    b) Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle.

    I'm guessing there's no girlfriend, either, but the only evidence I have supporting this is that, well, this guy memorized 100,000 digits of Pi. C'mon...

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:Details by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I'm guessing there's no girlfriend, either, but the only evidence I have supporting this is that, well, this guy memorized 100,000 digits of Pi. C'mon..."

      Yeah... I just love the guy posting on Slashdot about his assumption of some other guy not having a gf because of how he spends his time.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in Japan it's generally considered a good thing to be smart.

    3. Re:Details by Poltras · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Please explain to me how reciting a number to 100,000 digits is smart. Sure lot of memory, and I don't say he's not smart, probably does a good job as a consultant, but this act by itself is by no mean a proof of his intelligence. Now, he must be the only man who can remember (or not) the birthdays of his parents and girlfriends (if he has any)...

    4. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      b) Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle.

      Well, that would need to be in base 11. Nothing in TFA says he recited in base 11 or if the todai computation was in base 11.

      Man, I need a girlfriend.

    5. Re:Details by iron-kurton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, that's not fair. I'm posting on Slashdot, and married... to a real girl!

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    6. Re:Details by BJH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, he's in his 50s, he's married, and his wife was there when he was reciting it.

    7. Re:Details by Psychofreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seconded. Happily hitched for 3 years and counting!

      Maybe we should do poll on the marital status/relationship status of Slashdot?

      Phil

      --
      Laugh, it's good for you!
    8. Re:Details by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pointless. CowboyNeal will obviously win.

    9. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy is almost a senior citizen. You try remembering 100k digits when you get to his age.

      The practice of memorization isn't easy for long random sequences. This guy must have had some intense methods for concentration.

    10. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you just need to listen to Tom Leykis and bang various bitches.

    11. Re:Details by pilkul · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Now, he must be the only man who can remember (or not) the birthdays of his parents and girlfriends (if he has any)...
      Not necessarily. Memorizing large amounts of random information has more to do with effective mnemonic techniques and capacity for intense concentration than base retentive skill. If he doesn't concentrate on something, he still can forget it. I've heard from people who like to memorize decks of cards that it's a cool party trick but it's a good idea not to let your girlfriend know you can do it for just this reason!
    12. Re:Details by ThreeE · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right that reciting pi to 100K digits isn't overly valued in the US. I'm assuming that was your implication...

    13. Re:Details by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      What if he's just doing the old divide-multiply-subtract-bringDown pattern as he goes?
      Then it's more of an endurance test that a memory test.
      Not to take anything away from the accomplishment, mind.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    14. Re:Details by rjstanford · · Score: 4, Funny
      Um, he's in his 50s, he's married, and his wife was there when he was reciting it.


      So, you're saying that he probably does have a girlfriend?
      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    15. Re:Details by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please explain to me how reciting a number to 100,000 digits is smart. Sure lot of memory, and I don't say he's not smart, probably does a good job as a consultant, but this act by itself is by no mean a proof of his intelligence.

      Consider that "intelligence" can be (mis)measured in many different ways. The classic measure is an IQ test, which arguably does measure one's depths of reasoning in various ways, but at the end of the day, an IQ test really just measures how good one is at doing IQ tests. There are other kinds of "intelligence". For example, Wayne Gretzky might score modestly on an IQ test, but on a hockey rink, he was a "genius" in terms of psychomotor skills.

      As other respondents have said, Haraguchi probably looks for patterns in the digits that he can associate with other memorable concepts, perhaps visual or aural, or both. I would argue that such an ability is indeed a form of intelligence, insofar as it does involve a higher form of mental activity -- a kind of "abstraction" of the perceived patterns of the digits into aggregates that are available for him to recall. I think it's similar to the kind of intelligence that a musician needs to memorize a piece of music.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    16. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I bet people were saying: "Shut your pi hole."

      I'd really hate to be the poor bastard who had to listen to all this and check that the guy was doing it correctly.

    17. Re:Details by gomoX · · Score: 1

      You try remembering 100k digits when you get to his age.

      You try remembering 1k digits right now.

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    18. Re:Details by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      More to the point (although you could infer it from the "newsworthiness" of the story): he did it from memory.

      You could "infer" it from the meaning of the word "recite".

      recite. To repeat or utter aloud (something rehearsed or memorized).

    19. Re:Details by Hawkxor · · Score: 1

      what the heck are you talking about?

    20. Re:Details by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle.


      Technically, since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats, any finite series of digits must appear at some point. The first 100 million digits of Pi, for example, contain most every 7-digit phone number. Of course, the longer the string you want to find, the further you have to go. But that's not really a problem.
    21. Re:Details by Javaman59 · · Score: 1
      I'm posting on Slashdot, and married... to a real girl!
      So was I, kid, so was I.
      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    22. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Technically, since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats, any finite series of digits must appear at some point.


      Sorry that's a non sequitur. There are series which are (a) infinitely long and (b) non-repetitive but which nevertheless do not contain any possible (finite) sequence of digits, just consider the series 1 0 11 0 111 0 1111 0 11111 - look no repetition Ma but the subsequence '1337' (for example) does not appear anywhere.
    23. Re:Details by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      Still a newlywed - 7 months and counting....

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    24. Re:Details by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Congratulations..:)..good luck to you and your wife.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    25. Re:Details by morie · · Score: 1

      counting up or counting down?

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    26. Re:Details by RMB2 · · Score: 1

      YMBNH

      --
      [/sarcasm]
    27. Re:Details by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Reciting the digits of pi by running a calculation in his head.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    28. Re:Details by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      b) Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle.

      Actually, did they analyze the result for this? analyzing pi for hidden messages is harder than just calculating it. There certainly is a cicle hidden in pi, the question is if you find it earlier than randomnees would predict.

    29. Re:Details by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      But then again, even with good associative patterns to help him recall all those digits, he probably still needed mucho time (several months, if not years...) to memorize it all.

      Now, how smart is it to spend so much of your life on a task that is basically, ummm, pointless? It doesn't leave anything behind neither for yourself and nor for humanity.

      And least, we Linux geeks leave software behind that makes some tasks easier to ourselves and to other people ;-)

    30. Re:Details by gkhan1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sorry, you're wrong. What you are saying has not been proven about pi, infact it is not proven whether all numerals appear an infinite number ot times in the decimal expansion of pi. It could be the case that the number 9 only appears a couple of billion times or so, no one knows. Don't go assuming things you're not sure of.

    31. Re:Details by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      You're right. Doing that 100,000 times in a row without making a mistake would be even dumber than just memorising it. I'm soooo not impressed.

      --
      I hate printers.
    32. Re:Details by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing there's no girlfriend, either,

      Don't be too sure of that.

      A few years ago there was a popular documentary about the national spelling bee. One reviewer made an interesting point: it really sucks to come in second. The sacrifice it takes to get to that level brands most kids as nerds, but that stigma is erased if you achieve the status of being the best there is.

      Intellectual powers are, in their extreme form, a form of reproductive fitness after all. Einstein apparently was attractive to women, and it certainly wasn't his look or his charm.

      There's a story that George Bernard Shaw was approached by a young woman who proposed to have sex with him, becasue the fruit of their union would have her looks and his brains. "But madam," Shaw reported replied, "what if it has my looks and your brains."

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:Details by psymastr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's 60 fuck's sake. Why should he have a girlfriend? Nerd jokes are so American and so unfunny.

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
    34. Re:Details by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I looked at the wikipedia page on pi and realized that it would be just as challenging to carry out a power series expansion as to do rote memorization.
      Unless he has some heretofore undisclosed pi-fu that we just don't know about.
      Maybe he used XML or something... ;)

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    35. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe in Japan memorizing Pi is like - super hot - and they had to invent the japanese harem just to accomidate the throngs of girls throwing themselves at him for his mastery of number memory. If not? If not i'm sure there's at least one slutty geek girl in japan who sleeps with him just to say she did that. The guys I feel sorry for are the guys sitting up at 5am talking about him and his love life on the interne....damn it.

    36. Re:Details by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Technically, since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats, any finite series of digits must appear at some point.

      Don't think that's true. Counter example: consider the stream of digits comprised of pi with all 7's removed. Still infinitely long and never repeating, but 7 never appears now.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    37. Re:Details by david_g17 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You try remembering 100k digits when you get to his age.

      You try remembering 1k digits right now.

      no problem. i have the first 100K digits memorized already... 1,2,3,4,5,6,7...
    38. Re:Details by jonadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Memorizing large amounts of random information has more to do with effective
      > mnemonic techniques and capacity for intense concentration than base retentive

      Innate ability does help, but mostly memorization is a learned skill.

      I should know. I'm heavily involved with a quizzing program -- not the random-trivia type of quizzing, but the sort where they give you a particular text to study for a few weeks and all the questions come from that text. Naturally the best quizzers memorize the whole material. At the national level, practically all of the quizzers memorize the entire material, and the best ones know things like how many times certain words are used. (I know several of these best quizzers personally. I happen to live in the North Central Ohio district, which takes first place in the nation more often than any other district in the program.)

      So as I said, innate ability helps, and especially it helps inherently somewhat brighter people to get "into" the program more quickly and get started more easily, but the quizzers who take home the trophies are not the ones who started out smartest; they're the ones who studied most and/or the ones who have been quizzing seriously for the most years. With *rare* exceptions, new quizzers don't start out memorizing. At first they read over the material every day and try to learn enough of it to answer some of the questions. Because certain sections of the material are designated for especial memorization, most quizzers eventually reach the point where they start memorizing at least those sections. After they've done a few, it gets easier. Nobody memorizes *all* of the memory sections the first time he memorizes everything. They start out with a few, and work their way up, until they're learning all of them. Like I said, it gets easier after you've done more of it. Once they reach the point of having memorized all of the memory sections, it's about a quarter of the whole material, so they start to realize then that they could just flat memorize all of it. In NCO we try not to put anybody on the district team (i.e., the team we send to nationals) unless they've reached the point where they're willing to seriously attempt that.

      The quizzing program doesn't just teach memorization (although the learning of the text is an important goal for pretty much everyone involved). Because the quizzers have to answer questions, not just recite, and because they have to *finish* the question before they can answer it (assuming the quizmaster didn't already finish it, which at the higher levels of quizzing he almost never does, because invariably the level of competition is such that the quizzers are off their lights before the question is half done), there are other kinds of mental activity as well.

      Incidentally, the quizzers in this program are kids and teens. I'm far too old to quiz these days, but I coach and I serve as quizmaster (i.e., ask the questions) and sometimes judge. I did quiz when I was younger, and I was on the district team in 1992.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    39. Re:Details by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that intelligence is all around us, just sometimes we have to either look harder to find it or just redefine intelligence all together?

      Another example, some might have thought Earl was stumbling mindlessly drunk at the party last night, but had they looked closer they would have noticed that his intricatly placed footsteps were actually a plot of the first 18,000 coordinates of the Tau Dirichlet Series.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    40. Re:Details by Bob-taro · · Score: 1
      b) Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle.
      I was just curious, and yes, apparently it's been mathematically proven that pi does not repeat.

      Regarding the girlfriend question - he's actually married. They quote his wife as saying, "Very impressive, now what's my birthday?"

      --
      Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
    41. Re:Details by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Not a RealGirl (tm)?

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    42. Re:Details by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Haraguchi probably looks for patterns in the digits that he can associate with other memorable concepts

      Okay...right, yeah. That's good for the first 100 digits, but what about the rest?

      Contrary to what you may think, the "memory association trick" only goes so far. Eventually you have to get to the point where you can just force yourself to remember what you want to remember - i.e. develop trained photographic memory.

      Try memorizing things more often. Your memory just gets better. No tricks required; you can just remember more and longer when you want to.

      Maybe he pushed it and was able to use the trick for the first 1000. But he went WAY past that. That many hours of straight of memorization means learning how to memorize things really well.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    43. Re:Details by Versalis · · Score: 1

      "I'm guessing there's no girlfriend, either, but the only evidence I have supporting this is that, well, this guy memorized 100,000 digits of Pi. C'mon..."

      I dunno, I think most women would pretty pleased with a man showing such oral mastery of pi(e).

    44. Re:Details by larsroe · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's true. I recall reading that you can never have more than a certain number of zeros in a row. There's a theorem that puts the maximum number of consecutive zeros in pi to around 20 or 30. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find where this is mentioned.

    45. Re:Details by Morphine007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That sounds almost as exciting as stabbing myself in the face with my pen.... repeatedly....

    46. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking "like sparying black paint over my third eye"...but ya, I can see the pen.

    47. Re:Details by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The last time I read Guinness Book of Records, which admittedly was a couple of decades ago, the rules for recital of pi allowed for reciting an approximation of pi, where the digits would form a repeating pattern after a while. That makes it oh so much easier.

      I'd like to know whether this guy did the Real thing, and whether the counting would stop at the first error.

    48. Re:Details by !ramirez · · Score: 1
      Sorry that's a non sequitur. There are series which are (a) infinitely long and (b) non-repetitive but which nevertheless do not contain any possible (finite) sequence of digits, just consider the series 1 0 11 0 111 0 1111 0 11111 - look no repetition Ma but the subsequence '1337' (for example) does not appear anywhere.


      He didn't say that any series that is infinitely long and non-repetitive will have any possible finite series of digits, he said that Pi would. You're debating a different mathematical point.
    49. Re:Details by CultFigure · · Score: 1

      He did the real thing. Trust me, I was there.

      He also rubbed his belly and patted his head the whole time! Truly amazing...

    50. Re:Details by rjstanford · · Score: 1
      He didn't say that any series that is infinitely long and non-repetitive will have any possible finite series of digits, he said that Pi would.
      Actually, what he said was, "since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats..." Since that was his only stated reasoning, disputing the premise by disproving the given reasons was completely valid.

      Sorry to spoil what could have been a good bash-fest with, like, actual quotes and stuff though... feel free to disregard.
      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    51. Re:Details by !ramirez · · Score: 1

      True. Semantic reasoning was never my strong point.

    52. Re:Details by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      You're describing the Spelling Bee Question From Hell. Now I'm even more impressed.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    53. Re:Details by bogado · · Score: 1

      He remembers birthdays by index of pi, for instance my birthday may 24th appear at the index 15,634 of pi witch clearly is easier to memorize then "may 24th" :-D.

      Source: http://www.angio.net/pi/bigpi.cgi

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    54. Re:Details by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      • Um, he's in his 50s, he's married, and his wife was there when he was reciting it.
      • So, you're saying that he probably does have a girlfriend?
      Or a MySpace account...
      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    55. Re:Details by rlbond86 · · Score: 1
      My computer recited pi to infinity - 1 places.

      /me wonders how this is news

    56. Re:Details by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Aww, he won't be able to remember mine. Not until 170,000...

    57. Re:Details by jlowe · · Score: 1

      I have given a number of IQ tests. They measure specific skillsets. You have to remember that intelligence is a concept, not a tangible thing. Therefore, all measures of intelligence must first accept a definition for what intelligence actually is. Believe it or not, there are major IQ tests that have different theoretical bases for the definition of intelligence. For example, the Wechsler scales are very well-known. The IQ test for children was updated in 2004. In the new revision, the theory of IQ has changed from the theoretical basis of the previous version.

      That is one "issue" with accurate intelligence measurement. Another concern is that some questions are biased to specific groups of people. For example, your cultural upbringing may cause you to answer a question one way, while I answer it another due to my own background. Is it fair to say one of us is wrong based on a cultural belief?

      But there's more. When an IQ test is scored, the overall score is derived from scores of similarly aged people across the country. Each time a new revision comes out, the norms are updated. Someone who takes a current IQ test may get a score of 115, which perhaps would have scored as a 110 two or three revisions back. How can we compare one's IQ to another over time if the norms change?

      I could go on and on about this. So, no, intelligence is not a random thing that can be applied different ways. However, it is also not a clearly measured factor, either. I must also agree with the grandparent. I cannot play music, or sports, but I definitely think there is a form of intelligence that people who can do those things have. The problem is we cannot always directly test those abilities with consistent reliability. You should check out Howard Garner, who theorized this idea of multiple intelligences.

    58. Re:Details by VanessaE · · Score: 2

      Ok then, if that's impressive, how about this: I am a girl, married (just over 5 months), and I actually post here!

    59. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very good info and quite interesting how an "IQ" which is thought of to be an absolute measure is actually both subjective and volitile.

      Question for you. Is there a trend amongst these "revisions"? Would people taking IQ tests today score higher or lower on tests several year ago or is it more random/complicated than that? Is there any way to even compare the scores of now to say Einstein? Its also funny how he [Einstein] is almost considered a benchmark for (very) high IQ's.

      FYI, my original post was actually just a joke...

    60. Re:Details by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Technically, since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats, any finite series of digits must appear at some point.

      Not necessarily. Determining whether pi is normal number - one that contains all digits with probability tending to 1/10, all 2-digit sequences with probability tending to 1/100, etc. has been quite difficult to the various number theorists who have looked at it.

      "Never repeats" implies that you never repeat the entire string forever - not that substrings aren't repeated. It's obvious that 3.14159 1 14159 2 14159 3 14159 42 14159 1337 14 14159 8675309 etc. can be extended infinitely and still would never repeat. It's not so obvious that it contains every possible substring (and this result would directly depend on how you choose the numbers between the 14159s).

    61. Re:Details by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Technically, since Pi is infinitely long and never repeats, any finite series of digits must appear at some point.

      Not necessarily. Determining whether pi is normal number - one that contains all digits with probability tending to 1/10, all 2-digit sequences with probability tending to 1/100, etc. has been quite difficult to the various number theorists who have looked at it.

      "Never repeats" implies that you never repeat the entire string forever - not that substrings aren't repeated. It's obvious that 3.14159 1 14159 2 14159 3 14159 42 14159 1337 14 14159 8675309 etc. can be extended infinitely and still would never repeat. It's not so obvious that it contains every possible substring (and this result would directly depend on how you choose the numbers between the 14159s).

    62. Re:Details by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for some reason, the phrases "quotation question" and "give a complete answer" came to mind when I read your post. I spent most of my quizzing days playing with the cork at the bottom of the buzzer.

    63. Re:Details by jlowe · · Score: 1

      There is a slight downward trend. I cannot give you specific numbers or make any statements regarding this because I would be simply talking out of my ass. What this trend indicates is not clear. The meaning of intelligence itself and how we accurately measure it shifts. Are we more accurately measuring what we call intelligence, and therefore getting more accurate results across the nation? Or, is it that we as a society are becoming less and less intelligent? Who knows. I will say this though. I generally only give IQ tests if there is a child suspected of having a mental disability or a child who may be "gifted." It is funny with the smart children. The idea is to try to identify them very early in their education (but not before staring 1st grade) because a lower percentage of older children meet criteria. Does this mean the education system does not meet the needs and challenge these smart individuals? Maybe so. Regarding the issue of comparison, I am not sure about correlations between versions of tests. I know that data is there, but I don't know how often that is actually utilized. If someone has a very high IQ, they are going to have a high IQ no matter what test they take, so the issue really becomes moot.

    64. Re:Details by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

      "I can prove that an infinite series of a set does not contain any finite series of the same set by pointing to elements not in the set."

      That is an absurd comment. It is just as ridiculous as the AC above who said that you wouldn't find a '3' in an infinite series of 1's & 0's.

      The people modding you both up as "insightful" have the same muddled mindset. It isn't insightful. It's patently absurd.

      An infinite series of a set must contain any finite series of that set, by simple definition.

    65. Re:Details by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Maybe his dream was to have people talk about him around the world, for a few minutes at least. Beats stamp collecting.

      It's not much different than the guy with the 12 foot long fingernails or an olympic gold medalist.

      The money doesn't drive people that accomplish extreme feats, it's just not a good enough motivation. Being noted in a history book somewhere is probably more important to them than being rich.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    66. Re:Details by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

      Don't think that's true. Counter example: consider the stream of digits comprised of pi with all 7's removed. Still infinitely long and never repeating, but 7 never appears now.

      That's true, but pi is not such a sequence. Your sequence is extremely nonrandom/ordered, as is the sequence 101101110111101111101111110 etc. cited in an earlier post.

      The digits of pi are apparently random so far as all current tests have measured. (It has not been proven to be random, but as far as we know, it is.)

      If the digits of pi are in fact random, as they seem to be, then all finite sequences appear with equal probability in that stream. If so, then as the number of examined digits approaches infinity the probability of finding any particular sequence approaches one.

      So the grandparent poster's statement was ill-supported but the conclusion was (probably) correct. If pi's digits are random and it is infinitely long, any specific sequence will appear at some point. "Random" is a much stronger criterion than "non-repeating".

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    67. Re:Details by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Actually, quizzing is a lot of fun. We have a blast at rallies.

      It does, however, also require a bit of work. Nothing worth having is easy.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    68. Re:Details by jonadab · · Score: 1

      We don't use those kinds of buzzers. We use the light pad sets from Quiz Time Systems, mostly. You don't hold anything in your hands. You sit on your pad, which has little switches in it, and when you get _off_ your pad, your light comes on if you're first. (If you're not first, the way the thing's wired keeps your light off until the other person sits on his pad again, so there's no question about who won the jump.) So the standard posture involves leaning forward, with all of your weight on your feet and calf muscles and just enough of your rear on the pad to keep the light off, watching the quizmaster's lips.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    69. Re:Details by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      If the digits of pi are in fact random, as they seem to be, then all finite sequences appear with equal probability in that stream.

      Suppose we have an infinitely long stream of decimal digits S1 that we agree is (truly) random. We now produce a second stream S2 by expressing S1 in binary, resulting in only ones and zeros. Despite never having digits 2 through 9, it would seem that S2 is still truly random like its predecessor S1... unless we adopt as the very definition of randomness that "all finite sequences of decimal digits eventually appear in an infinitely long random sequence", which is notably different from the GGP's criteria of "infinitely long and never repeats". S2 fits the GGP's criteria, but violates the assertion that therefore all finite sequences will appear.

      Also notable is that S2's digits will still fit a probability distribution, as is commonly expected of random sequences... just not a probability distribution defined to necessarily include the digits 2 through 9.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    70. Re:Details by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      An infinite series of a set must contain any finite series of that set, by simple definition.

      In terms of defintion, "infinite" means "never ending", and includes no further assertions about content. "Randomness" is the concept that begins making assertions about content, and it contains no provisos that would prevent a binary stream (all ones and zeros) from being just as certifiably random as a decimal stream.

      But thanks for all the name-calling, what with the "absurds" and the "muddled" and the decrying of how undeserved the mod points are. That's more compelling than structured discussions could ever be. You win!

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    71. Re:Details by MyNymWasTaken · · Score: 1

      This is why I called your argument absurd. It is not name-calling. I purposefully stayed away from calling you an idiot or any other epithet. The argument is absurd.

      Absurd: utterly or obviously senseless, illogical, or untrue

      "A truly random infinite series of a 10 element set cannot possibly contain every finite series because if you transformed the 10 element set into a 2 element set, a subset of the 10 element set, then it won't contain every element of the 10 element set. Therefore, not every finite series exists in a random infinite series."

      That is an absurd statement. Thinking that statment is 'insightful' is muddle-minded.

      The statement "All finite series [of the set used by the infinite series] will appear in an infinite random series." cannot be refuted by saying "If all 7's are removed from that series, then there will be no 7's in it. Therefore, not all finite series will appear in an infinite series." It is an *absurd* statement.

    72. Re:Details by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 0

      Wow, married for -7 months....that's a pretty neat trick :-)

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    73. Re:Details by bogado · · Score: 1

      I made a quick program and discovered that the last date that appear in PI is 12/03 in the position 60872, so at least in theory he can memorize anyone's birthday using indexes. Unless you are trying to compute the year also. :-)

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    74. Re:Details by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had the year in it. Suppose that would be kinda irrelevant.

    75. Re:Details by Morphine007 · · Score: 1

      Nothing worth having is easy.

      couldn't agree more. I just fail to see the attraction. dah well... to each his own...

  2. Good Manners by Noginbump · · Score: 1

    At least he didn't talk with his mouth full...

    --
    He who questions training, only trains himself at asking questions. -- The Sphinx, Mystery Men
    1. Re:Good Manners by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, when he wasn't eating rice balls, his mouth was full of pi.

      OK, OK, I'm leaving, no need to shove....

    2. Re:Good Manners by NiceRoundNumber · · Score: 1

      I bet people were saying: "Shut your pi hole."

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of letting other people have your way.
    3. Re:Good Manners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooh, that's gotta suck. so close, yet so far. Not so round, now, is it? Might as well go back to your main, know what I'm sayin'? You're just being pathetic, now. Could have made a grand on ebay, with that nick and the six aughts, but you only got five . D'oh!

    4. Re:Good Manners by NiceRoundNumber · · Score: 1

      Actually, I kind of like it. It coincidentally has the same format as my phone number (ABBBBBC), and as we all know from the Hitchhiker series, 42 is what you get when you multiply six by nine; the universe has a sense of humor that way... Also, there's no reason I can't try again when the ID's approach 2000000. In any case, my main account has the karma maxed out; where's the fun in that? :)

      OTOH, I wonder who did get the cool million, and whether they were trying for it?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of letting other people have your way.
  3. The name for that kind of chanting by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 5, Funny

    is "Transcendental Meditation".

  4. Obligatory Wierd Al Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Pi is like so last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Memorizing the digits of e is cool.

    1. Re:Pi is like so last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, well I just recited the first 200,000 natural numbers.

      From memory.

      Beat that!

    2. Re:Pi is like so last year by Poltras · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pi is sooooo last millenium.

    3. Re:Pi is like so last year by eis271828 · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. People should know me.

    4. Re:Pi is like so last year by balbord · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! It's funny!

      --
      "If I have been able to see so far, It is because I went out and bought a damn binoculars" - Ze da Esquina
    5. Re:Pi is like so last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      e: We require a mnemonic to remember a contant log

      Number of letters in each word is e with 8 decimals...

  6. I know pi to 100K places by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ain't got no grills, but I still wear braces ...

    Weird Al's got nothing on this dude.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:I know pi to 100K places by tehshen · · Score: 1

      I learned 150 or so decimal places by singing a song about dancing and robots and dancing robots. Flirting with infinity your geometric progeny that fit inside you oh so tight with triangles that feel so right etc

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:I know pi to 100K places by Claws+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

      Sir, I salute you! One of the videos that make me love the internet.

  7. What is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put this kind of thing in the same category as so-called "competitive eating". Yeah, it's impressive on some small level I guess, but what is the point? What drives somebody to do such a thing?

    1. Re:What is the point? by jemenake · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it's impressive on some small level I guess, but what is the point?
      Exactly. The point is to do something that you can hold the world-record for. Personally, I think it would have been easier to recite the digits of "pi + 1". The record probably isn't for as many digits on that one. Or "2 * pi"... or "pi * pi". Heck! They're going to have to have a whole *chapter* set aside for just *my* records.
    2. Re:What is the point? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Better yet, pi - (pi - 3)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
  8. Whats wrong with 3.14 by AugustZephyr · · Score: 0
    In 2002, University of Tokyo mathematicians, aided by a supercomputer, set the world record for figuring out pi to 1.24 trillion decimal places.

    I wonder how long it will be until Mr. Haraguchi breaks a trillion. He has already obviously wasted, err... dedicated so much of his life to memorizing the first 100k places. Isn't 3.14 a good enough approximation. Or if you are feeling really lazy pi~=3.
    1. Re:Whats wrong with 3.14 by nead · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it will be until Mr. Haraguchi breaks a trillion

      He won't live long enough

      Presuming you started counting the instant you were born, and that you lived for 80 years, and that you could recite 10 digits per second, you'd still only get to 25 billion digits or so before you died.

      86400 sec/day * 365.25 day/year * 80 yrs/life * 10 digits/sec = 25B digits/life

    2. Re:Whats wrong with 3.14 by Znale · · Score: 1

      The people that brought us over a trillion digits at super-computing also supply a PC program to calc pi up to 32 million. My 2 year old does it in 3 seconds for comparison to the reciter. Don't know how long their computer would take for 25B

  9. Re:White and Nerdy... by coso · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that work and he could have just asked Weird Al.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xEzGIuY7kw

  10. 22/7 by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    22/7. Not pi, but an incredible simulation... for a fraction, at least.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:22/7 by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just remember 355/133 (3.1415929...). It's the most accurate fraction possible with only a three-digit numerator and denominator. (WP)

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    2. Re:22/7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just remember 355/133 (3.1415929...). It's the most accurate fraction possible with only a three-digit numerator and denominator.

      It's not that accurate: 355/133 = 2.66917... . I think maybe you meant 355/113.

    3. Re:22/7 by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

      Quite right.

      --
      http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
    4. Re:22/7 by DaveLatham · · Score: 1

      Really? Doesn't look right to me, seeing as how it is less than 3.

    5. Re:22/7 by RobRyland · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, that is the most accurate fraction with a denomenator 10,000. When you go to 5 digit denomenators the best is 312689 / 99532 with 6 digits : 3126535 / 995207 with 7 digits : 5419351 / 1725033 with 8 digits you hit the magic 245850922 / 78256779. the error is -7.8179366199075e-17 so the difference is zero in double precision arithmatic. -Rob

    6. Re:22/7 by ehrichweiss · · Score: 1

      Actually 355/113 ;)

      --
      0x09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    7. Re:22/7 by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Uh, no.

      355/133=2.6691729323308270676691729323308

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    8. Re:22/7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      355/113 gives you 7 correct digits (3.141592) for the price of 6 (355,113). Your other examples give you one less digit than you paid for, so you are better off learning the digits of pi directly rather than learning those fractions.

    9. Re:22/7 by trime · · Score: 1

      I hate to point out the seemingly obvious but...is this really that useful? I mean, you have to remember 6 numbers (which the poster has proven not to be as easy as you might think! :P ) just to get 7 and a bit places worth of precision! (about 15% compression) why not just remember 141 and 593 and save yourself the CPU prower of having to decompress it? :-)

    10. Re:22/7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pi/1 is marginally more accurate than 355/133.

    11. Re:22/7 by jandrese · · Score: 1

      One can argue that it's easier for a human to remember a numbers that have a pattern to them. If you write out the division like you did in grade school the pattern is extremely easy to remember:
      ```____
      113)355
      Humans are much better at remembering patterns than they are sequences of random numbers.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    12. Re:22/7 by YGingras · · Score: 1

      I can remember about 100 digits but remembering digits of pi for calculations is pointless. No way you are going to require more than 4 digits if you only have pen an paper. In fact, I never used recalled digits for calculations. I either use the pi button on a calculator or the pi keyword in a symbolic algebra system. You should try to remember digits of pi for a noble goal, not for mere calculations. I do it to pick up chicks! OK I don't but one chick did tell me "remembering pi is pointless, you do it just to impress chicks". Yes that was in a math dept...

    13. Re:22/7 by Ziwcam · · Score: 0
      I do it to pick up chicks! OK I don't but one chick did tell me "remembering pi is pointless, you do it just to impress chicks".
      The problem is they usually walk away after the first 5,000 digits or so...
    14. Re:22/7 by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

      Aside from the 355/113 comments above... I'm fairly sure 710/226 is just as accurate, and just as many digits.

  11. This is coming out as a DVD box set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    With english/french/spanish 5.1 and DTS and will be released when Mr. Haraguchi finishes the commentary track.

    1. Re:This is coming out as a DVD box set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody has a link to the torrent?

  12. Videotaped? by CyberZCat · · Score: 1

    Well I don't know about you, but I sure wouldn't appreciate a film crew in the restroom taping ME while I was taking a dump. Not that I suppose anybody would want to watch it anyway... but STILL!

    1. Re:Videotaped? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Not that I suppose anybody would want to watch it anyway... but STILL!"

      alt.binaries.pictures.fetish.scat

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Videotaped? by Da3vid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe he'll get the world record for most video recorded bathroom breaks in a row by a 60 year old man. When was the last time anyone checked out the Guiness Book of World Records? Those are the types of records they're looking for.

    3. Re:Videotaped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      torrent pls

    4. Re:Videotaped? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I find it surprising that Guinness doesn't have most of the measurements we'd all be interested in. Like world's largest breasts. Or highest number of multiple orgasms. How about the longest schlong? Instead of measuring the length of a guy's piece and settling the answer once and for all they measure some idiot who hasn't cut his fingernails for 20 years and they coil around like that lousy Ferengi whip weapon that they fortunately did away with early in the Next Generation series. What's up with that?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:Videotaped? by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      I knew someone here would bring that up. :)

      Bodily functions in Japan -- and indeed, most of the world outside North America -- are not considered dirty or taboo. Here in Japan, they have co-ed washrooms in a lot of places. Even the more modern segregated washrooms are often laid out so anyone can see you taking a whiz when they walk past the door. It's not at all unusual for the cleaning lady to come in and start cleaning the urinal next to you.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    6. Re:Videotaped? by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1
      Nahhh, the World Chess Championships are all over it.

      http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=337 0

      World Champion and Grandmaster Kramnik alegedly goes 50 times during 1 game...

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    7. Re:Videotaped? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If I get job, can I put a camera in lady toilet?"
      "Are you familiar with the term 'lawsuit'?"

  13. Rice by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... going to the rest room and eating rice balls during the attempt

    I wonder how many digits of pi can be squeezed onto a piece of rice.

    1. Re:Rice by geekoid · · Score: 1

      all of them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Rice by wannabgeek · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many digits of pi can be squeezed onto a piece of rice.

      It's a _ball_ of rice. If you make sure the cross-section is circular, all the digits of pi can be fit into that!

      --
      I'm much more funny, interesting and insightful than the moderators think
    3. Re:Rice by Gwwfps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A whole ball could actually hold at least a few thousand digits if not more. In a lot of places in China (usually near tourist attractions), there are artists who write your requested messages on rice. After some googling, I could only find these two pretty bad photos. The first seems to be not as good as most I've actually seen, the second just shows an artist working. Another one can give one a real idea of what the masters can do: 42 US presidents on rice.

    4. Re:Rice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're perfectly spherical balls of rice. He's measuring them.

    5. Re:Rice by Lisamree · · Score: 1

      Off the subject: but I'm now preoccupied with the notion of going to the bathroom in the same sentence as eating rice balls.

  14. Only 100kb ? by Conti · · Score: 1

    100,000 decimal places? That's only 100kb, it could even be written on a 5.25 floppy if I still had one. A guy able to recite all of the latest kernel sources, THAT would be impressive.

    1. Re:Only 100kb ? by codefrog · · Score: 1

      or 50 kB if you encode it as BCD, or less than that represented in binary...

    2. Re:Only 100kb ? by JohnnyDanger · · Score: 1
      I checked Hamlet from Project Gutenberg... It is about 200kB, with Hamlet having a fair fraction of the lines. That is, the sheer volume of memorization is probably a similar task. 16 hours is obviously longer than the play's runtime, but digits average more than one syllable per character, while words average less than one.

      The real trick would be setting up cues so you don't lose track of where you are.

      Also cool is http://pi.nersc.gov/, which allows you to seach digits of pi (converted to letters) for words and such.

    3. Re:Only 100kb ? by 500IE · · Score: 1

      i'm sure numbers average more than one syllable per character...but he's probably only reciting one digit at a time. if so, numbers break down 50/50 as far as 1 vs. 2 syllable digits in japanese. in english it's very one-syllable sided. at least when only reciting digits 0 - 9.

      --
      i thought i had lead poisoning until i stopped browsing at -1
    4. Re:Only 100kb ? by finiteSet · · Score: 1
      A guy able to recite all of the latest kernel sources, THAT would be impressive.
      I knew a guy who could do that... trying to remember his name... festival something. I think he might have a manpage.
      --
      If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
    5. Re:Only 100kb ? by fishbowl · · Score: 1


      >I checked Hamlet from Project Gutenberg... It is about 200kB, with Hamlet having a fair fraction of the lines.

      But Hamlet is not a transcendental, irrational number. Rather, it is a well-formed-formula in a well-defined grammar, and it is further formed into quite regular patterns (scans like poetry).

      There is no comparison between this and memorizing something that for the most part, is a context-free random string.

      So the guy know pi to 100,000 digits. I wonder if he actually knows it further. I also wonder how many digits he knows for, say, ln 2, or e, or sin(1) ?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:Only 100kb ? by Danga · · Score: 1

      100,000 decimal places? That's only 100kb

      Why would you inefficiently store it as characters? Store it as binary and you can fit WAAAY more digits into that space.

      --
      Hey, there is only one Return and it's not of the King, it's of the Jedi.
    7. Re:Only 100kb ? by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 1

      While, I'm sure you were talking about some kind of floating point binary representation, you are correct that you can represent it in binary in much less space, for example you can compress it down to at least 541 bytes.

    8. Re:Only 100kb ? by Tuqui · · Score: 1

      He really make a story from the numbers to memorize the sequence, He was explaining that the last time he break the record.
      He assigns sillabes to each digit from 0-9 and constructs a story about that, then when he recite the numbers he recall the story word by word and deconstruct to digits again.

    9. Re:Only 100kb ? by Rythie · · Score: 1

      I'd say since you can store upto 1024 in 10bits, so call that 3 digits, then: 100,000 / 3 = 33,333.33 33,000 * 10 = 333,334 bits (rounded up since you can have half a bit) 333,333 / 8 = 41,667 bytes

    10. Re:Only 100kb ? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just store it as "ratio of circumference to diameter"?

      How many bits does that take? Maybe it takes a lot of "bits", but those "bits" are also used for other stuff as well.

      The way minds work is quite different from computers and the lack of understanding about how they work is why the AI field is still a "dismal science" IMO.

      --
    11. Re:Only 100kb ? by Jerf · · Score: 1
      He really make a story from the numbers to memorize the sequence,
      Which is, as near as I can make out, the Ultimate Key to memorization stunts of all kind. And in the case of memorizing things from a fixed set, picking appropriate story coding schemes and just practicing enough to commit them to memory.

      My memory is probably sub-par overall, but using this technique, I was able to roughly double somebody's score on the Brain Age memorization game vs. somebody with a better memory than me but trying to just say the words and remember them.

      (I haven't seen them since but I expect that if they are using that technique they would once again trounce me.)

      Read this, try it, and save $$$ from not having to buy elaborate memory books that tell you exactly what's in this message, and maybe include the author's custom coding schemes for some domain that you may not even care about. (And it doesn't much matter, you're probably better off making your own custom coding schemes that will fit your own mind better. Coming up with an encoding scheme is about as hard as a word-association game.)
    12. Re:Only 100kb ? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      it could even be written on a 5.25 floppy if I still had one.

            Shhhhh don't say that, it will cost you your nerd status. Of course you still have a 5.25 floppy (here, take mine and hold these punchcards for me)!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:Only 100kb ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to allow outside help (programming languages, compression), a mere 10 to 12 digits will get you a guy on the phone who can read you out as many as 100,000 digits.
      Or you could represent your value in 'base-pi', write '1' and call it a day. ...

  15. He's using memory technique by zymano · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He's not memorizing like a regular person would.

    It's been talked about on slashdot before using some memorization technique association groups of numbers with memorable patterns.

    Don't ask me for links.

    1. Re:He's using memory technique by gkwok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Poe, E.: Near a Raven encodes the first 740 digits of pi using word lengths as digits, while preserving the structure, story, and tone of the poem it is based on.

    2. Re:He's using memory technique by coobird · · Score: 5, Informative
      He's not memorizing like a regular person would. It's been talked about on slashdot before using some memorization technique association groups of numbers with memorable patterns.

      More specifically, he memorizes the digits by making a story, probably from the sound of the numbers.

      In Japanese, you can make a play on words by the sound of the numbers called goro-awase. For example, if there is a sequence of numbers such as "3341", it can be read as "sa-mi-shi-i" which means "sad". By having a series of these play on words, he can make up a story, which is much easier to remember than a sequence of numbers.

      If you're curious, here is the article (in Japanese) that mentions that the guy makes a story to memorize the digits.

    3. Re:He's using memory technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All large scale memorization is done using tricks unless you have some special talent (photographic memory or whatever; even that is usually limited). Often seemly hard problems can be arranged in such a way that they are friendly to the mind and not really that hard.

      Hell, that's how I managed to complete every college biology course with a final grade over 100%.

    4. Re:He's using memory technique by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Interesting
      One of the oldest and most venerable general-purpose mneumonic techniques is called simply The Art of Memory, which basically involves memorizing a particular path through a particular building, and then populating that mental building with objects and symbols based on whatever one is trying to remember. In an age before cheap paper and writing utensils, this was very widely used, though rarely written about, and is likely responsible for much of the West's obsession with symbolism and dual meanings (the cournicopia as a symbol of plenty, Mars and Venus representing masculinity and femininity, the whole art of heraldry, the assignment to each saint of a particular profession, etc.). Indeed, Freemasonry, that most symbolic of institutions, owed some of its broad popularity, and its shift in focus from an operative guild to a speculative fraternity, to its connection with the Art of Memory.


      I imagine that this guy was probably using a more specialized mneumonic, like the Raven poem linked to by the guy above, but as the Wikipedia link mentions, many of those who perform great feats of memory do still use this. Let's admit it though: there is no extant trick which would make memorizing 100,000 digits EASY.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    5. Re:He's using memory technique by BJH · · Score: 2, Informative

      He didn't do it this way; too ambiguous.
      He developed his own method, whereby each digit was assigned to a row of hiragana (e.g. 1 = anything from the ka line, 2 = anything from the sa-line, etc.) and built up a memorizable string of words using those sounds.

      Still means he had to memorize a 100,000 syllable story, though.

    6. Re:He's using memory technique by skidde · · Score: 1

      It's also possible he used a song to help him out.

      If anyone's too lazy to check the link I can always post the lyrics instead.

      --
      For every karma whore there are four more people with mod points to kill.
    7. Re:He's using memory technique by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      The Memory Book describes the techniques for doing this. Basically, you assign numbers to consonants:
      1 = t, d
      2 = n
      3 = m
      4 = r
      5 = l
      6 = sh, ch, j
      7 = k
      8 = f, v, ph
      9 = p, b
      0 = s, z

      Then, you form words from the numbers, and somehow link the words together. For example:
      9185 271 9521 6390 9 1 12 becomes
      A beautiful naked blond jumps up and down.

      or, pi becomes

      Ma door towel pin shell mule fob cup, etc

      and you imagine a picture of your
      MA nailed to a DOOR,
      drying yourself off with a DOOR instead of a TOWEL
      a TOWEL made entirely of little PINs
      a sewing machine that has a sea SHELL mounted on it instead of PIN (and is busting the shell up)
      a bunch of SHELLs hitched to the Borax wagon instead of MULEs
      A MULE hanging from your watch FOB
      a giant CUP hanging from your watch FOB
      and so on.

      Of course, it's real work coming up with memorable words and associations. It requires fairly intense concentration, and an active imagination. But even a novice can use this technique to memorize 20-50 digits in a single evening, no problem. The biggest problem is not actually forgetting the digits, it is in reading them wrong in the first place.

      Now, obviously, this guy was Japanese, so he probably used something a little different.

    8. Re:He's using memory technique by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      A grade over 100%? Was it really college, or was it Donkey Kong Country?!

    9. Re:He's using memory technique by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he uses an algorithm in his head and calculates it over and over again until he finally makes a mistake. That seems easier than memorization or remembering a story word for word.

      Has anyone recited the Bible word for word by memory?

    10. Re:He's using memory technique by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Hmph. I just memorized 3.14159265358979323846 because math class was boring.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    11. Re:He's using memory technique by Hangeron · · Score: 1

      Memorization is cool, but it would be even cooler if he could calculate the digits on the fly.

    12. Re:He's using memory technique by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Exactly. What would be especially amazing is if he could quickly tell you the nth decimal of pi, with n being a random number from 1 to 100,000.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    13. Re:He's using memory technique by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Don't ask me for links.
      What, you've forgotten them?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:He's using memory technique by Atzanteol · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the Bible, but I hear it's common for many Muslims to memorize the Koran word for word.

      --
      "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"

      - Charles Darwin
  16. Let me be the first to say... by neodude88 · · Score: 1

    How the HELL does someone do that?!

    (Hopefully this will incite meaningful discussion.)

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you memorize some every day, let's say 80 digits a day or 400 a week allowing time for consolidation. The ancient Greeks used to memorize the text of the Odyssey and the Iliad; other folks memorized the Bible and other religious stuff. I don't think it's an insurmountable feat.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Firehed · · Score: 0, Troll

      Well, I can recite Pi to 1,000,000,000,000,000 places. Just not correctly (and probably not in my lifetime, if it took 16 hours for only 100,000 digits). Let me start for you: 4 point...

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How the HELL does someone do that?!"

      I'm starting to wonder if it would be easier to learn how to calculate the pi decimal places in real time than to memorize such a long string.
      But I'm not a mathematician.

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say... by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      The same way people memorize the Bible and the Koran.

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Memorizing one hundred thousand structured words is not the same thing as remembering one hundred thousand nonconsecutive numbers.

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say... by AppHack · · Score: 1

      (Hopefully this will incite meaningful discussion.)

      Evidently not.

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      I don't really keep up with algorithms for calculating pi, but I think even if you were able to perform such a calculation on the fly without the aid of a computer to arbitrary decimal places, it would take a lot longer. They said it took him 16 hours for 100k digits, which is 1.75 digits per second. It'd have to be a really quick calculation to match that.

  17. Those long winter evenings... by thewils · · Score: 1

    ...must really whiz by at his place.

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  18. Re:White and Nerdy... by Mr2001 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Al only knows it to a thousand places.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  19. he's a psychiatric counselor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone able to do that probably needs a psychiatric counselor themselves!

  20. Of course... by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Akira Haraguchi [...] a psychiatric counselor

    So I guess being able to recite pi to the 100,000 digit is just further evidence that he's crazy.

    --
    "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    1. Re:Of course... by eobanb · · Score: 1

      psychiatric != psychotic

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Of course... by rollercoaster375 · · Score: 1

      Says who?

    3. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never meet a psychiatric dr or counselor or anyone else who works in that field have you?

    4. Re:Of course... by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have added a disclaimer about being in the mental health field myself. (Perhaps it would have helped with the "overrated" mod.) ;)

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  21. Wow oh wow... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    So how many decimal places of pi does one see in a bowl of pee? Inquiring minds want to know...

  22. That's very impressive... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...except it's not a really useful skill any more. Of course, in the earliest days of humanity when you passed down things orally it was vital, and even after we learned to write you still needed a human to have "the big picture". Indexes and search engines and hyperlinks have made that almost redundant too. Memorization today is trivia, and my computer is a helluva lot better at it than me. It could easily store all the trivia of LoC and Wikipedia combined. Unless I can get an understanding out of it, which of course requires knowing the subject matter, I don't see the point. Memorization is for me means to an end, if you don't seek an understanding of it why bother with it at all?

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:That's very impressive... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And I am sure everything you do is always really useful?

      Great, now i'm thinking of Thomas the Tank Engine, who is a really usefull engine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:That's very impressive... by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      "And I am sure everything you do is always really useful?"

      That seems an undue slap at GP. He never claimed that everything that he did was useful. He simply noted that, due to technological changes, some skills are not of much use any more. And he's right.

    3. Re:That's very impressive... by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure, Olympic Runners can run fast, but what is the point? Any car made in the last 100 years can go faster.

      Sure, in the days of hunting/gathering, it was a vital skill. Transportation, for me, is a means to an end, but if you have no place to go, why even bother with it at all?

    4. Re:That's very impressive... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      That many places of pi will probably never be useful. It doesn't take that many until you're hitting the "less than one electron width of error in a circle that goes around our entire galaxy" territory.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:That's very impressive... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Even then, margins of error in other areas will kill the precision of anything past the 100th digit....... (and I'm probably overestimating)

    6. Re:That's very impressive... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      No, he isn't. I'd be quite happy to have the ability to memorize...say...series of 25 consecutive letters and numbers...so much easier than having to go back and forth between notepad and app x when it asks for a key ;-)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:That's very impressive... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      I dont think he honed the skill to facilitate his day to day existence. Its pretty obvious he did it because he enjoys the challenge. If you don't understand why he would enjoy a challenge, you have a really shit life ahead of you.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  23. At 60! by neatfoote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It'll probably come out sounding patronizing, but I've got to say, I'm glad it was a 60-year-old who managed this. Our culture today is far too youth-centric-- hurray for older people proving they're capable of competing with and even outperforming the whippersnappers at feats of freakish, useless intellectual wankery.

  24. easy by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    The babes!!!

    wait a minute....

  25. Doh! by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    And I still can't even remember some of my own phone numbers!

  26. since this is pi we're talking about by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    This is actually circular meditation.

  27. I once memorised a pack of playing cards by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 0, Troll

    It started of Ace of Spades, then two of Spades, then three of Spades... ...then Queen of Hearts, and finally King of Hearts.

  28. or better, recite some reverse engineered DRM by openright · · Score: 0

    Reciting some reverse engineered DRM, or other encryption code would be a useful demonstration.

    because the DMCA does not trump freedom of expression.

    But perhaps such a performance should be ouside of the US, just in case.

    1. Re:or better, recite some reverse engineered DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reciting some reverse engineered DRM, or other encryption code would be a useful demonstration.

      Ask, and you shall receive. Yes, this is all from memory, so please forgive me if I miss a bit somewhere.

      While it's cool to be able to recite a song like this, it's not a complete description of how to read a DVD -- it's not even a complete description of the 'descramble' function. Putting aside the question of how to obtain the title key (which is considerably more difficult), here are a few important things that aren't mentioned in the song:

      • This code assumes it's running on a little-endian CPU (note step 3.) It also assumes that an 'unsigned int' is at least 32 bits.
      • It uses the five "CSS tables" of the Fawkus implementation:
        • CSStab4 is a table for reversing the bits in a byte. If x = (hgfedcba)_2, CSStab4[x] = (abcdefgh)_2.
        • CSStab5[x] = CSStab4[x] xor 0xff.
        • CSStab2 and CSStab3 are tables for speeding up the LFSR17 computation. Each clock consists of XORing bits 0 and 14 of the LFSR, and shifting the result into bit 16. For each byte of the DVD, we "clock out" eight bits. Adding to the confusion is that fact that this code stores the LFSR in two separate variables (t1 and t2) and in reverse bit order. In the end, if I've worked this out correctly CSStab2[x] is going to equal (x * 0x49) >> 6, and CSStab3[x] is going to equal ((x & 7) * 0x49) >> 1. Keeping in mind that CSStab3 is 512 bytes since the range of t1 is 0-511.
        • CSStab1 is for computing the bit scrambling. If x = (hgfedcba)_2, then compute
          A = (a & b) ^ d ^ 1
          B = (e & f) ^ g ^ 1
          C = (A & B) ^ f ^ 1
          D = (A & B) ^ b ^ 1
          E = (a & b) ^ c ^ 1
          F = (e | f) ^ h ^ 1
          G = (E & F) ^ a ^ 1
          H = (E | F) ^ e ^ 1
          and CSStab1[x] = (HGFDECBA)_2.

      "Descramble", by Joe Wecker

      This function is void / It takes two args / The first is SEC, a pointer to a vector of twenty-forty-eight unsigned bytes that are the encrypted disk sector and will be the decrypted / The second is key, a vector of six unsigned bytes / The decrypted title key / Local variables t1 through t6 are unsigned ints / Local variable end is a pointer to SEC plus twenty-forty-eight

      DMCA steps on me / I don't like the DMCA / It makes this song illegal / Oh woe, DMCA / It steps on me / It makes this song I wrote / Makes this song illegal

      Retrieve byte zero of key / Xor it with byte eighty-four of SEC / And treat the result as an integer / Or it with the hexadecimal constant 0x100 / And store the result in t1

      Step two: Retrieve byte one of key / Xor it with byte eighty-five of SEC / And store the result in t2

      Step three: Take bytes two through five of key / Xor them with bytes eighty-six through eighty-nine of SEC / Store the result in t3, yeah

      I hate the DMCA / It makes this code I wrote / Oh, it makes it dumb / It makes it illegal / I hate the DMCA / It makes this stuff I wrote / Makes this song illegal, yeah

      Step four: Take the low order three bits of t3 / Which can be obtained by taking the and of t3 and the constant seven / And store the result in t4

      Step five: Multiply t3 by two / Add eight, subtract t4 / And store the result back in t3

      Step... five-and-a-half: advance SEC by a hundred and twenty-eight bytes

      Step six: Store zero in t5

      Seven: BEGIN A WHILE LOOP.

      And eight: continue iterating while SEC does not equal end.

      Use t2 as an index into table CSStab2 / And retrieve a byte / Which we'll call b1 / Use t1 as an index into table CSStab3 / And retrieve another byte / Which we'll call b2 / Compute b1 xor b2 / And store the result in t4

      Step ten: Shift t1 right by one bit / And store the result in t2

      Step eleven: Take the low order bit of t1 / Which can be obtained by taking the and of t1 with the constant 1 / Shift it by--left by eight bits / And xor it with t4 / Store the result back into t1

      Oh, the DMCA-A-A is

  29. Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Fish+(David+Trout) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure we can all remember the first digit: 3, right?

    But it's all those digits (decimal places) that follows the 3 that we all have trouble remembering, right?

    So okay. Just memorize the following simple phrase:

        "I wish I could recollect pi easily today"

    The number of letters in each word are the first 8 decimal digits:

            1 4 1 5 9 2 6 5

    Thus PI is approximately: 3.14159265...

    Which should be <i>plenty</i> long enough for most calculations.

    The only hard part of course is remembering to use the word "recollect" instead of "remember". :)

    --
    "Fish" (David B. Trout)
    1. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      Or you could just memorize those 8 digits. That's just one more digit than a local phone call.

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    2. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 2, Funny

      How I wish I could enumerate pi easily, since all these fucking mnemonics prevent recalling any of pi's sequence more simply!

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    3. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by CadetUmfer · · Score: 1

      *shrug*

      ~> python
      >>> import math
      >>> math.pi
      3.1415926535897931

    4. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the word "fucking" should be 8 characters instead of 7.

      (Just in case anybody tried to use the above mnemonic to do anything important)

    5. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, time for everyone on Slashdot to prank call 314-1592. GO!!!

    6. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "freaking" ?

    7. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by mkosmul · · Score: 1

      Better yet:
      bc -l
      scale=1000
      4*a(1)
      3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 105820974944592307\
      81640628620899862803482534211706798214808651328230 664709384460955058\
      22317253594081284811174502841027019385211055596446 229489549303819644\
      28810975665933446128475648233786783165271201909145 648566923460348610\
      45432664821339360726024914127372458700660631558817 488152092096282925\
      40917153643678925903600113305305488204665213841469 519415116094330572\
      70365759591953092186117381932611793105118548074462 379962749567351885\
      75272489122793818301194912983367336244065664308602 139494639522473719\
      07021798609437027705392171762931767523846748184676 694051320005681271\
      45263560827785771342757789609173637178721468440901 224953430146549585\
      37105079227968925892354201995611212902196086403441 815981362977477130\
      99605187072113499999983729780499510597317328160963 185950244594553469\
      08302642522308253344685035261931188171010003137838 752886587533208381\
      42061717766914730359825349042875546873115956286388 235378759375195778\
      18577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201988

    8. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by mkosmul · · Score: 1

      My preferred one is "How I need a drink, alcoholic of course, after the tough lectures involving quantum mechanics."

    9. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by nacturation · · Score: 1

      ~> python
      >>> import math
      >>> math.pi
      3.1415926535897931


      Might want to file a bug report on that one. It's 3.1415926535897932...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    10. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can easily remember pi up to that precision. My first "good" calculator had as 3.1415927, and I thought that was pretty odd, because Commodore 64 had one more decimal place: 3.14159265.

      And you could type the pi symbol in C64, and it served as the constant's name. Haven't figured out how to do that in PC, aside of setting kb layout to greek, which is kind of complicated... =) (Argh, Slashcode seems to filter &pi;, too. Welcome to year 2006, character sets are still a big problem in computing!) And people are complaining about proposed Unicode operators in Perl 6 - heck, in Commodore 64, not only we had non-ASCII operators (up-arrow for exponents), we had non-ASCII constant names, for pi! Er, PETSCII constant names. =)

      I just tried to remember more decimal places than that. I guessed "3542", but apparently I got the last two wrong (should be "89"), I can't possibly guess why, as I'm not that huge fan of Douglas Adams and I'm running out of ideas besides that. Ah...

    11. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      I'm sure we can all remember the first digit: 3, right?
      Yes.

      Oh, I see, that's clever. All I have to do is remember the answer to a question that I have to remember contains the information I am trying to remember in the first place, then remember that the number of letters is the number that I am trying to remember.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      fracking :)

    13. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I remembering correctly?

      Let's see

      PIE,

      I wish I could determine Pi
      Eureka cried the great inventor
      Christmas pudding Christmas Pie
      Is the problem's very centre

      ---ends---

      Short and Sweet

    14. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

      Japanese do not remember obfuscated number sequence that way.
      We set a 'hiragana' (Japanese alphabet) for each number that is taken from the first 'hiragana' from a number read literally.

      For example, '1' is read as 'hitotsu' or 'ikko', so it can either be 'hi' or 'i' in Japanese alphabet and then you concatenate those hiragana to make it look like a sentence chosen from a few choices of hiragana each number represents.

      The made up sentence does sound weird and hardly makes much meaning but it is just about as same as remembering a looooong poem, instead of what you have shown, which is done in a mathematical way without much relevency toward the phrases chosen and does tend to get longer.

    15. Re:Easy way to remember pi to 8 decimal places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also works in German and rhymes.

      "Wie, o dies p, macht ernstlich so vielen viele Müh..."

      (Slashcode strips out my pi entity reference. Substitute p with the single Greek letter.)

  30. Interesting by Rorian · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking tonight about how my memory of Pi is dwindling away over time.. I used to remember over 100 digits, now..

    3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399385 105 is about all I can manage..

    At this rate I'll be at 3.1 by the time I turn 60 :P

    --
    Will program for karma.
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399385 105 is about all I can manage..

      The bit I've bolded is where you start to misremember, I think. Let me see how much further I remember it: ...39937510582097494459230781... and then I start to get hazy. I used to use it as a rough barometer of how drunk I was - I forgot about five digits per standard drink.

    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can probably do 225 digits. At one week I power-remembered up to 500 digits and could keep them for a few days but I never maintained it into longterm memory.

      The first 225 though I dont have to really actively remember anymore. If I start speaking them its just like a song I know well. ..7816406286 2089986280348253421170679 8214808651328230664709384 4609550582231725359408128 481174502841027019385211 0555964462...

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I know it's sad that there are so many of us here to correct you, but it's 375105... at the end, you had an 8 instead of a 7 :-)

    4. Re:Interesting by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

      I always remember 4*ATN(1)

      --
      No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
  31. 100,000 digits is nothing... by Nahor · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I'm currently at 1,135,972 digits for 1/3. Also, I already finished reciting all the digits for 1/2.

    1. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny
      Also, I already finished reciting all the digits for 1/2.
      1/2 huh?
      Good luck with 3/4.
      It's twice as long!
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by gkhan1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm, no it doesn't. 0.5 is 1/2, just like 0.50 or 0.500. It only contains 1 decimal place. Think of the number 7. You could call that number 07.0, but that doesn't make it any less correct to just call it 7

    3. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Intel inside?

      --
    4. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think he should recite PI backwards from the final digit. That would be a real feat!

    5. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by ashwinds · · Score: 1

      Wait till you get to 1/9 - it gets really difficult.

    6. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      You could call that number 07.0, but that doesn't make it any less correct to just call it 7

      Mathematicians... always spoiling all the fun!!

      --
      So say we all
    7. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by Grant,thompson · · Score: 1
      1/2 huh? Good luck with 3/4. It's twice as long!

      3/4 is only 50% bigger than 1/2. Back to Math class kid, you're bothering me!

      1/2 * 1.5 = 3/4
    8. Re:100,000 digits is nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a moron. He said it's twice as LONG. .75 has twice as many digits as .5 and thus is indeed twice as long, for the purposes of recitation.

  32. It's not storage space, it's bandwidth by burndive · · Score: 1

    The bottleneck is the interface between the computer and your brain. Now, as soon as we get computers to think for us this won't be a problem (because then people will only be necessary until the computers perfect robotics), but until then, we're going to need people who can randomly access large data sets and are adept at interpreting and analyzing the data. We call these people experts, and they are vital to the existence of society.

    --
    ...because "hacker" sounds way sexier than "code drone."
  33. Akira Haraguchi's quotes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Things Akira Haraguchi would say if he were a Slashdotter:

    All your first 100,000 digits are belong to me.
    Only 60-year-old neighbors of North Korea need precision.
    In Soviet Russia, transcendental numbers recite YOU.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Akira Haraguchi's quotes by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our digital overlords.

  34. And I thought ... by gone_bush · · Score: 1

    that slashdotters were weird!

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less travelled by. (Robert Frost, 1916)
  35. off by one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...385 105 is about all I can manage.."

    you mean ..375 105?

    1. Re:off by one? by Rorian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed I got that one wrong after I posted, but /. doesn't let you reply for a few minutes, by which time I had moved onto combing through digg for more interesting stories

      --
      Will program for karma.
  36. 100,000?! by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

    I can't even count to 100,000!

    1. Re:100,000?! by chavo+valdez · · Score: 1

      Funniest comment in some time! Too bad my mod points just expired.

    2. Re:100,000?! by 8ball629 · · Score: 1

      Heh, looks like I just got 'em ;).

  37. Brief unofficial translation of newspaper by patio11 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saw this linked above by an AC. http://www.asahi.com/national/update/1004/TKY20061 0040185.html Its an article in the Asahi Shinbun about the feat. My brief non-literal translation follows (if its inaccurate, sorry in advance, for accurate translations you can pay me my hourly):

    "Using equivilence rules like 3 = sa [n.b. all numbers in Japanese have a variety of syllables which they can be read as -- thus, you can remember a phone number as roughly a two to three word phrase, like my bank being 555-GOT-MONEY], you can memorize the first N of the infinite digits of pi by constructing a story of sufficient length and memorizing that. His previous record was seven years ago.

    After reciting the 100k digits they were checked against a computer printout. Mr. Haraguchi then retired with his family. They brought him his favorite beer, which he proceeded to chug. He commented 'Its good that I was able to relax'*"

    * This is ambiguous in Japanese: my guess is he is referring to his ability to have been relaxed while reciting the digits, but eh, doesn't really matter either way.

    By the way: my back of the envelope math suggests 100k digits of pi would leave you with a Japanese text about a tenth as long as the Bible, give or take. So its neither impossible nor a mean feat to have memorized a text of that length.

  38. This reminds me of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a special called Brainman on the Discovery Science channel, a camera crew followed around a savant named Daniel Tammet. He was "only" able to count to about 22,514 decimal places in about 5 hours. For Akira Haraguchi it is a case of memorization, but for Daniel Tammet the digits somehow appear in his mind. I think Daniel was also able to tell if a number was prime or not. I'm not positive about this, but IIRC some scientists at Stanford university quizzed him using a known way to tell if someone is either calculating the digits in their head or if it is just based off memorization. Of course he passed the test. Since there are probably inaccuracies in my comment, I would suggest checking out Brainman on Discovery sometime.. it is a great special.

  39. A public performance? by Toxicgonzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    He made the attempt at a public hall in Kisarazu

    Did people actually go to watch this guy? What did they say to each other when he finished?

    "Hey, remember the part when he was all like 3, 5, 1, 7, 4, 4, 2, 5, 6, 6, 2, 1, 0, 4, 5, 7? That was wicked sick"
    "Yea, yea, and then he followed it up with a 4, 2, 4, 7, 3, 1, 1, 5, 2, 2, 5, 9, 0, 2, 3 and I was like ROCK ON Akira, ROCK ON"

    1. Re:A public performance? by rollercoaster375 · · Score: 1

      You deserve WAY more mod points for that. That's probably the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. Or maybe it's just the sleep deprivation. Either way, I'm sorry I didn't have the mod points today.

    2. Re:A public performance? by MikeWasHere05 · · Score: 1
      You deserve WAY more mod points for that. That's probably the funniest thing I've ever read on Slashdot. Or maybe it's just the sleep deprivation. Either way, I'm sorry I didn't have the mod points today.
      QFT.
    3. Re:A public performance? by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Funny as shit.

      Probably also the sleep deprivation...

    4. Re:A public performance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be impossible since those progressions of numbers are not in the first 100000 digits of pi.

    5. Re:A public performance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if fans of the previous record holder were chanting, "Shut your pi hole!"

    6. Re:A public performance? by rollercoaster375 · · Score: 1

      He was breaking his own record.

  40. crazy psychiatrists by zobier · · Score: 1

    I've heard people say that psychiatrists are a little bit crazy themselves.

    --
    Me lost me cookie at the disco.
  41. The real story by cameronh4050 · · Score: 1

    pssht, honestly, we all know what really happend... he said the first one hundred digits, everyone fell alsleep, then he randomly said 99,900 numbers... and no one was rude enough to say "oh, can you do that again please, i missed it"

    --
    *thinking of decent signature*
    1. Re:The real story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, that's just how President Bush gets through most of his speeches.

  42. Hrm, e. by eingram · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I thought I was cool for reciting e to 50 decimal places in calculus class last year. ownt ;\

    1. Re:Hrm, e. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I interrupted my Maths teacher a day or two after memorising pi to 100 decimal places.
      He was writing pi on the blackboard, so I went up and wrote it out to 100 places, then went and sat down.
      Several minutes later I realised that I had got one of the numbers wrong... but luckily no one else spotted my mistake. Whew!

    2. Re:Hrm, e. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad. Even if this guy hadn't smoked you, you still wouldn't be cool.

  43. Really slow news day? by Animats · · Score: 1

    Must be a slow day at Slashdot.

    1. Re:Really slow news day? by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      Aw, come on. This is News for Nerds. Being able to recite 100,000 digits of Pi is pretty nerdy-sounding to me. I, personally, think it's pretty darn cool. No, it isn't about lasers, it isn't about fusion, it isn't about some new computer chip, but still something that I (and a lot of other people, considering the amount of comments here) find interesting and fun. Lighten up a bit!

      --
      Love sees no species.
  44. can someone explain this to me? by mary_will_grow · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any idea how this is possible?

    Are regular people capable of memorizing a sequence like that?

    I can't even remember what kind of pie i had for dessert last weekend. Da Dum, DING! I can't even remember why the hell I started reading this stupid Slashdot rag. haha!

    --
    Why stick up for big business?
    1. Re:can someone explain this to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, anyone who wants to can do this. You could, I could, a random person of the street could.

      He is using a variety of mnemonic and other techniques (you can find most on the net, or look on wikipedia for memory and memory expert). As someone mentioned in the thread earlier, he could be using a common technique where he makes a story out of the numbers, eg. say you visualised a door for the number 4, and a cane for the number 1, and a tree for the number 3 etc. Then 3.14 would be visualised as something like the following: You walk past a tree and take your cane to rap on the door.

      As you practice you can learn to develop your 'chunking' of the data - in other words, he'll go over certain sets of numbers (say every 100 or so) so many times, he doesn't need to visualise the entire thing, he can just think of a trip in a park etc. to call up the next sequence.

      Chunking is also how chessmasters can remember positions in chess games where beginners can't - the beginner is trying to remember 20-odd pieces on a board, but the expert sees patterns of 5-6 pieces at a time, so it is much easier.

      It all comes down to practice. A recent New Scientist article was detailing recent research that indicates that experts and geniuses are made, not born. That is, if you think of people like Tiger Woods, or Stephen Hawking or Mozart, we find that they really aren't special in their abilities - they just practiced a heck of a lot more than everyone else in their specific areas. Outside of those areas, they aren't really any better than other people. The rule of thumb is that it takes 10 years of hard work to reach the heights of some field. And that 10 years is made up of a few hours a day practice - it is also called the 10,000 hour rule for this reason. And the practice has to be continually challenging yourself, going past your abilities (that's why a person being trained in golf or tennis quickly surpasses the weekend sportsperson - the weekend sportsperson isn't challenging themselves or using the best techniques. They get "good enough" and then plateau in their ability.)

      So, if you want to devote a few years or decades to this sort of thing, you'd become an expert too :) (But to get some of the benefits would only require a few months of learning memory techniques).

    2. Re:can someone explain this to me? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      if you think of people like Tiger Woods, or Stephen Hawking or Mozart, we find that they really aren't special in their abilities - they just practiced a heck of a lot more than everyone else in their specific areas.

            Rubbish. Geniuses are naturally good at almost ANYTHING they do, and are often multi-talented. When they get a lot of practice in their skill is unattainable by those who just don't have that spark.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  45. Worse thing that can happen to a man by Plutonite · · Score: 1

    is to videotaped while he's on the toilet seat eating rice balls and trying to remember the 130000th digit of pi. It's the shebang of all bad moments.

    Actually, just being this person must be terrible. Our minds have so many things in them..trolls, flames, C++, pedantic logic, Prison Break, Dubya, pr0n.. this guy has one thing and one thing only in his head: Pi. He's reached, like, the limit of neurological "permanent" storage.

    If he remembers to bruth his teeth at night, he automatically looses a couple hundred digits. If he realises he likes rice balls, it's 50 digits down the drain. Imagine living like that, a life where every thought can possibly disrupt your memory, destroying years of your life's efforts. Your brain geography is covered in PI. You wake up: PI. Work desk: PI. Local pub: PI. Bed-time: PI.

    I think I'm going to write a song about how dying in prison and going to hell is better than PI.

  46. Mod this FUNNY! by Psychofreak · · Score: 1

    That's hysterical!
    Phil

    --
    Laugh, it's good for you!
  47. Re:White and Nerdy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the video, it only goes up to 700 places.

  48. I um by thorkyl · · Score: 1

    um dang, cant remember

    me think tis a 3.14 somthing

    --
    -- I am the NRA, enough said...
  49. Oh come on! by Headcase88 · · Score: 1
    "It is usually written out to a maximum of three decimal places, as 3.141, in math textbooks."
    This guy can memorize pi to 100 000 digits and this article can't even get 4 right :P

    (technically 1 is the 4th digit, but not in the context they're giving).
    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    1. Re:Oh come on! by treeves · · Score: 1

      What I see as wrong with the OP is that it wouldn't be written anywhere as 3.141. Rounding it to three deciaml places, you would write it as 3.142! Usually one sees 3.1416 or 3.14159 or 3.1415927, but never 3.141

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  50. Daniel Tammet by Fyrecrypts · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Daniel Tammet the autistic man whom recited over 22,000 numbers in Pi. He also learned Icelandic in a week as part of a documentary he was the subject of. I wonder if he'll try to do more than 100,000 now that he has more motivation.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Tammet

    1. Re:Daniel Tammet by Bandraginus · · Score: 1

      Actually, what's even more impressive is the fact that he *calculated* Pi to over 22,000 digits in his head. For him, it was no memory trick. He had little preparation beforehand.

  51. Do you know... by SirBruce · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you know the history of psychiatry?

    Bruce

  52. how perfect... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    Just how perfect of a circle does one really need? Whats the point of all this rogue "memorization"? I'm sure my calculator was dually impressed, even though it never suffered from any accuracy problems in the past.

    1. Re:how perfect... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Just how perfect of a circle does one really need?

            One with an infinite radius is kinda cute. In fact if you look at part of its circumference all you'll see is a line. Perfect! The stealth circle.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  53. Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle. by initialE · · Score: 1

    Er you're not supposed to do the counting in base 10...

    --
    Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    1. Re:Sagan not proven right yet, still no circle. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      There is the conjecture that pi is a "normal" number, in which case Sagan's circular feature is there regardless of the base that you use. It's there an infinite number of times, in fact.

      But to my knowledge, pi hasn't yet been proved "normal". It just appears so from statistics on the first trillion or so digits in base 10, which is hardly a proof.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  54. Was it from memory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see anywhere where it said he recited from memory. Did he just have a computer telling him what number to say next? If so then wtf? That's just someone with too much time on their hands.

  55. Pi World Ranking by matw8 · · Score: 1

    This is actually pretty impressive when you look at the Pi World Ranking list.

    Yes... there is actually a Pi World Ranking List!

    http://pi-world-ranking-list.com/lists/memo/index. html/

  56. Other types of breaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if the cameras covered his masturbating breaks too...

  57. Get a life. Pi is stupid. by natas802 · · Score: 0

    Nuff said.

  58. Hot Dogs by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 1

    100.000 digits? Not bad, but not as impressive as his countryman Takeru Kobayashi who set another world record by eating 53 and 3/4 hot dogs and buns in 12 minutes.

  59. I'm jealous by Centurix · · Score: 1

    Because his circles will always be rounder than mine.

    --
    Task Mangler
  60. You must be new here... by Ruff_ilb · · Score: 1

    Since when do we do things because they're useful? It's just a cool fact, and that's sort of what /. is all about.

    --
    http://www.TheGamerNation.com/Forums
  61. Better than e! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 4, Funny

    i can recite the value for SQRT(-1)!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Better than e! by tajmahall · · Score: 1

      Better than e!

      You mean \Gamma(e).

    2. Re:Better than e! by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      dude, you already screwed up, first digit is j. . .every electrical engineer knows that. .

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    3. Re:Better than e! by amuzulo · · Score: 1
      --
      WikiCreole - a common wiki markup language
    4. Re:Better than e! by Nahor · · Score: 1
      i can recite the value for SQRT(-1)!
      And me, i can recite both values for SQRT(-1)! And even Google cannot do that!
  62. Uncanny by icepick72 · · Score: 1

    All my best thinking gets done on the can too.

  63. Why stop at 100,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know, 100,000 is such a nice round number, and it handily beats the previous record of 42,195 recited digits, but why stop at 100,000? Does he not know the 100,001st digit? Did he just mess up there?

    And what does it mean breaking his personal best of 83,431 digits set in 1995? Clearly he had no problem stopping at an odd number then, or did he think he knew the digits and just made a mistake? It implies that he made the leap from 83,431 to 100,000 without practice -- or does that statement mean he didn't vocalize the numbers?

    Anyhow, this is all academic. I think I remember Bubba reciting 100,000 ways to fix shrimp, in the movie Forrest Gump - now that's something you can sink your teeth into!

  64. Obligatory by pookemon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mmmm pi...

    --
    dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    1. Re:Obligatory by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 1

      Pi is exactly 3 Right now I have your attention, once he finished reciting it he was heard to say Oh my god I've wasted my life.

  65. Forget it's pi.... by Starker_Kull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...I can't imagine memorizing 100,000 ANYTHING. Most people know about 25,000 words, 1,000 or so people, etc. - there is a certain amazement at what the human mind is capable of. Can you imagine if he memorized 100,000 faces and names? 100,000 cities and populations? It is astonishing how much information we can learn...

    1. Re:Forget it's pi.... by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Most people know about 25,000 words
      Not on slashdot, unless you count spelling mistake variants as different words.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  66. Just 1 digit more accuracy ... how about 3 or 4 by Skapare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    OK, so you really meant 355/113. The value of that fraction is actually accurate to 7 digits, which is 1 digit more than how it is expressed in whole fraction form. But if you look further, you can find a fraction that has an accuracy that is 3 digits more than the total number of digits in the fraction. That fraction is (with digits chopped so it doesn't get mangled in Slashdot HTML):

    1901870728 5669230760 9014394471 4770339621 5907683135 4633719252 6115562704 3396809635 6432000780 8107929370 2997523451 8768883574 1387003036 8533612856 7115805986 7702399073 2279944269 0522019469 9766118756 0590556190 3648850292 8002591

    ... divided by ...

    6053842551 4642032610 2361023215 9405317163 9147815034 5020739231 2531721347 4068823247 6946000058 7137745497 9656144746 8267746412 8740227175 4410094658 7144148739 6268034351 3347328160 6663121381 1257617460 3015134435 3855924025 288111

    That's 217 numerator digits and 216 denominator digits for a total of 433 digits that gives PI to 436 digits. It doesn't get any better until a fraction with 14593 digits in both numerator and denominator for a total of 29186 digits that gives PI to an accuracy of 29190 digits, 4 more digits than in the fraction.

    But 355/113 is easier to remember and 355/133 is apparently easier to type :-)

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Just 1 digit more accuracy ... how about 3 or 4 by Martz · · Score: 1

      OMG you made me crash calc.exe!

    2. Re:Just 1 digit more accuracy ... how about 3 or 4 by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Did you work that out yourself?!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    3. Re:Just 1 digit more accuracy ... how about 3 or 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happend to 22/7? I'll remember that and keep my D...

    4. Re:Just 1 digit more accuracy ... how about 3 or 4 by Skapare · · Score: 1

      No. But a program I wrote did.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  67. to paraphrase a great mind... by smash · · Score: 1

    ... "3.141 should be enough accuracy for anybody"

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:to paraphrase a great mind... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      And to paraphrase the bible, "3 ought to be enough pi for anyone".

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  68. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    I thought pi was three?

  69. this not flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy needs to get a life

  70. Corrections by achurch · · Score: 1
    His previous record was seven years ago.

    His previous record was set last July.

    He commented 'Its good that I was able to relax'*"

    He commented, "It's good that I was able to do it relaxed." (This is unambiguous.)

    1. Re:Corrections by patio11 · · Score: 1

      God I must have been asleep this morning. Can I mod myself down? :)

  71. As to how he did it by Wasurechan · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I didn't credit the person above to mention goroawase. Anyway, there are many ways to pronounce the numbers in Japanese and many more can be assumed, so it's easy to just remember the story and recite it. Just for fun, I took a minute to do an example: 3.14159265358979323846 which could be pronounced "san hito yon ichi go kuu - futarou gomi, itsuya kyuushichi, kumi futami. hashi roku." which would translate literally as "3 people eat 4 strawberries - Futaro Gomi, Itsuya Kyuushichi, Kumi Futami (all legitimate Japanese personal names). There are 6 chopsticks."

  72. You missed something by tmk · · Score: 1

    Fujii said all of Haraguchi's activities during the attempt, including his bathroom breaks, were videotaped for evidence that will later be sent for verification by the Guinness Book of Records..."

    ...and Youtube.

  73. Re:White and Nerdy... by Propaganda13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Choice: Watching a 16 hour video of a guy reciting Pi or turning in my geek status.

    Answer: Guess I'm no longer a geek

  74. Oh ye fricking gods... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    WHY?!?

    Has humanity sunk so low that this gets listed as an achievement?

    I mean, come on now. I'm a nerd, a geek, asocial...

    BUT DAMMIT PEOPLE! Please stop proving the jocks right.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  75. Human Memory by curtvdh · · Score: 1

    Most people are quite unaware of the potential that the human brain has for storing information.

    Back when I was a good 'ol Fundamentalist Christian, I could recite the complete Gospel of John, Matthew, Galatians and a large part of Romans and I and II Corinthians. From the KJV, no less. About 3,500 verses in all.

    The secret is really no secret - simply dedicated, rote repetition. Of course, it helps that the the Bible generally follows a narrative - which gives you some clue as to what should come next.

    Now a fire-breathing atheist (when you have that much of the Bible stored in your associative memory, it doesn't take long before you come across a certain passage, and immediately think 'wait a minute - didn't book so-and-so, chapter xxx say something completely different?' Still, it really freaks out the Baptists, JWs and assorted cultists who come a-knocking. Good times.

    1. Re:Human Memory by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Still, it really freaks out the Baptists, JWs and assorted cultists who come a-knocking. Good times.
      I find the traditional "fuck off I'm a Satanist" quicker.
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Human Memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me that's just a perfect example of how "head knowledge" is no basis for faith. Faith is abstract, intangible, personal. As such, I attest that you always were an atheist. Your days as a "Fundamentalist Christian" were simply the living proof of 1 Corinthians 8:1-3. Since you already have it memorized, I won't quote it here.

    3. Re:Human Memory by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      True - that would be quicker, but I understand where the parent is coming from...


      Honestly, it is most fun when you have a witness. A friend of mine is the same way as the parent, but to a worse degree: when I knew him in high school (he was a freshman), he was a major "bible thumper" - carried his bible around everywhere, could quote things to you front and back and side to side. Not only that, he was a member of Mensa at the time. Even today, now that we are both much older, he still has what I would gauge as a 160 IQ or so. He isn't xtian any more, but he still retains the knowledge, plus a ton of extra stuff on all manner and sorts of philosophy, science, computers, etc.


      I haven't had the opportunity, but from what I have heard through third parties, it is very fun to watch him debate/argue/discuss with your typical "holier-and-smarter-than-thou" - watching them crumble, seeing their brains turned to mush - its like watching an Amiga crash to a GME, with all the "bells and whistles" to go along. I mean, when he is done with them, they are likely wondering about their own existence, let alone that of some invisible being in the sky.


      He isn't atheist, either - agnostic, at most - and perhaps in some ways, spiritualistic in ways (he once gave me a book on "chaos magick" to read - from later discussions with him, he seems to think such a thing is plausible)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  76. how confirmable is this? by killtacular · · Score: 1

    do they have voice recognition software good enough to verify this? It would take LOTS of humans listening and checking on this to verify it for me, and I know I wouldn't trust my bank's phone voice recognition software to verify this for me.

  77. Reminds me of captain Kirk... by Rashdot · · Score: 1

    ...when he made a computer selfdestruct by asking it a question that's impossible to answer.

    Someone must have told this guy: "imagine a perfectly spherical cow..."

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for.
  78. How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Did you type it from memory?

    1. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He hasn't answered you yet. Maybe he can't remember.

    2. Re:How by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Hell no. I can't even remember my Slashdot password.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  79. Not exactly hard, just depends where you live by Timberwolf0122 · · Score: 1

    for example in schools in Alabama it's dead easy.
    3.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000-ad nausia


    (okay I know it was an april fools, wasn't it?)

    --
    In the not too distant future, next Sunday A.D.
  80. Obviously not an embedded guy by mustafap · · Score: 1

    You only need 4 bits for a digit. Thats 50KB

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  81. All I know... by Kredal · · Score: 1

    I better have the first eight digits memorized so I can remember one of my domains... http://3.14159265.net/

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  82. Don't forget the raven and 740 digits! by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the famous poem Near a Raven, which is my favorite encoding 740 digits of pi.

  83. But doesn't PI recurr? by Wizard052 · · Score: 1

    I may be mistaken but some years ago I thought I found that PI was a recurring decimal- a kind of pattern appeared after a number of decimals or so...If this IS the case, then I guess there would be nothing that amazing about having memorized n number of digits.

  84. Ewwwwwww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    N/T

  85. 98 kB by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

    So basically humans have about 98 kBytes worth of memory :P

  86. he could... by SmartSsa · · Score: 1

    just memorize this: http://zenwerx.com/pi.php and go for more.

  87. What's so hard about that... by BTBking · · Score: 1

    I've memorized Pi exactly. It's just 10, but that's in base Pi of course.

  88. Re:Forget it's pi....(phbbbt) by gosand · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...I can't imagine memorizing 100,000 ANYTHING.


    I can recite whole numbers from 0 to 100,000. Maybe more. Does that impress you? :)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  89. I prefer Kate Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I am going to hear someone reciting Pi, better be Kate Bush. http://www.katebush.com/katebush_html/lyrics.html/ Pi, is the second song.

  90. Re:More Obligatory by scuba964 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, pi memorizes you!

  91. Videotape by Infernon · · Score: 1

    "...his bathroom breaks, were videotaped for evidence that will later be sent for verification by the Guinness Book of Records."

    Wow, what the heck was he doing in the bathroom?

  92. Just 3 or 4, how about 8 or 9 - over and over by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1

    I know you're answering to an integer division comment.

    However, if we're going to be promoting non-trivial equations, a better one would be the infinite series by Ramanujan from about a century ago.

    1/pi = summation { [ sqrt(8) / 99^2 ] * [ (4k)! * (1103 + 26390*k) ] / [ (k!)^4 * 396^(4k) ] }

    from k = 0 -> infinite

    The results, compared to pi (the spaces denote where the result becomes inaccurate):
    pi. = 3.1415926535897932384626433832795
    k=0: 3.141592 7300133056603139961890343
    k=1: 3.141592653589793 8779989058263151
    k=3: 3.14159265358979323846264 90657118

    With each increment of k, the accuracy improves by about 8 or 9 digits.

    To get to the same accurracy of as your example of 436 digits, the summation would need an upper bound of k = 50, I think. Even though this is a more complicated equation, it's a lot easier to remember than a simple division using 433 digits.

    Lastly, to get better results you'd only need to increase k. I think an accuracy of 29190 would require an upper bound of around k = 3400, with no need to remember a new set of 29186 digits.

    --
    This is not my sig.
    1. Re:Just 3 or 4, how about 8 or 9 - over and over by Skapare · · Score: 1

      That's definitely an interesting approach. Maybe it has a truly fundamental meaning about PI? But that sqrt(8) in there bothers me a bit. All in all, this calculation would take more time than the division would. But it is a great "compression" of PI.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Just 3 or 4, how about 8 or 9 - over and over by Tired_Blood · · Score: 1
      That's definitely an interesting approach.
      The main reason I remember it.

      Maybe it has a truly fundamental meaning about PI?
      Ramanujan was extraordinarily talented. This was just one contribution involving PI.
      As for this formula, it solves for 1/pi which wasn't surprising when I first saw it. A classic math problem is to find the radius of a circle with area equal to 1 ("1 = pi*r^2", then becomes "1/pi = r^2"), which was what I was reminded of that first time. Not that that really means anything, necessarily.

      But that sqrt(8) in there bothers me a bit.
      Then use 2*sqrt(2) instead. :)
      Actually, the formula is normally written with 2*sqrt(2) and 99^2 as 9801. The previously linked wiki article seems to explain the other constants (although I'm not claiming to personally understand it). Also, the first portion of the equation is normally written outside the summation since it is a constant, but I wanted to keep the equation as clear as possible (being confined to /. character-set limitations within posts).
      There are some other themes within the formula, such as the repeated occurances of 58 and 99. But again, I don't know enough to comment on this further.

      All in all, this calculation would take more time than the division would. But it is a great "compression" of PI.
      I did admit that it's more complicated, but you don't have to remember a new formula to achieve greater accuracy as you would using simple division. That's the beauty of it, just increment k. And, of course, computers can easily run formulas recursively.
      --
      This is not my sig.
  93. Some assumptions made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many Muslims who memorize the Koran do it without speaking Arabic (i.e. Indonesia, China, etc), so that would be similar to memorizing Pi - in neither case does it have an integrated structure to the person . Try memorizing half a page in a foreign language then try memorizing the same amount in Pi - I'd choose Pi.

  94. Wow by suparjerk · · Score: 1

    I only made it to 161 places.

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  95. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Redundant", huh? Man, the mods are stupid today.

  96. Introduction to D&D by alexo · · Score: 1


    > Please explain to me how reciting a number to 100,000 digits is smart.

    And this, boys and girls, is a prime example of the difference between Intelligence and Wisdom.

  97. How Many Digits of Pee Did He Recite? by littlewink · · Score: 1
    Break it down: Pi, Pee, Poo. Inquiring minds want to know!-)

    The answer is critical to my new random number generator.

  98. Undiscernable Patterns in PI? by Carlyle · · Score: 1

    I wonder if he could explain his ability/technique for memorizing the digits of PI, or if anyone has studied him. Maybe he has some intuitive insight into the number, that allows him to do this feat. It is incredible that he can memorize PI to this precision. I find it hard to comprehend that he could do this without some kind of strategy.

    If there is a technique that could be explained, then perhaps it could be applied to the field of mathematics, or put into a computer algorithm.

    --
    I'm the odd man out in an even number of participants
    1. Re:Undiscernable Patterns in PI? by schnoid · · Score: 0

      I think it has something to do with having it tatoo'd on his hand. :P

  99. Oh yeah, forgot about google - if you like that... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    If you like that, you might also enjoy:

    furlongs per fortnight in inches per minute (A little less than a couple of feet per hour).

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  100. Numbers are easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think that some people also find remembering certain things easier than others. I find I can remember numbers with little effort, but find names difficult. This has resulted in me dialling up the number for a girl (obtained verbally the previous evening in a club), only to find myself stumped by the fact I couldn't remember her name when her flatmate answered the phone.

    AC

  101. Re:White and Nerdy... by blippy · · Score: 1

    In a similar vein is The Afromen (Because we're too white): http://www.sequentialpictures.com/movieafromen.htm l

  102. 25,000 words? by GodGell · · Score: 1

    Most people know about 25,000 words

    That might be true for people who only speak english, but not true for most other languages. And you also have to consider people whose native tongue is a language that requires them to memorize hundreds of thousands of words, and then they learn english on top of that. And there are still many people who speak more than 5 or 6 languages.

    My point is, most people know way more than 25k words.

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10