Slashdot Mirror


Bill Gates Is More Admired Than the Pope

walterbyrd writes "Americans admire Bill Gates more than the Pope, the Dalai Lama and even Glenn Beck. The Microsoft co-founder and billionaire philanthropist was named the fifth most admired man of 2010, according to the latest USA Today/Gallup poll."

470 comments

  1. Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people admire his money, not his work, or the individual himself. I bet he also makes the "most loathed" list as well (along with the Pope)!

    1. Re:Problem: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, never underestimate the power of "Has never covered up a massive multinational paedophilia ring" on your CV...

    2. Re:Problem: by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How do you know that? Maybe many people admire him for building such a towering business as Microsoft. Besides, take a look at the full poll (Gates comes in at position 5). Obama is at the top and I can tell you more about what Bill Gates did to get there than I can Barak Obama. And if you object to that, note that George W. Bush is in at position #2. Should either of these people be held more highly than the scientists and engineers who contribute to the knowledge of the nation, or the entrepreneurs who bring in vast amounts of wealth to it through innovative products?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:Problem: by kmdrtako · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As opposed to releasing mosquitoes into a room that may or may not have carried the Malaria plasmodium?

      10 trillion flies eat feces -- that doesn't make feces good. 100 million people admire Bill Gates? Meh.

    4. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure, why make a thoughtful comment when you can be a jerk.

    5. Re:Problem: by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many people simply assume that he has to be smart in order to have created Microsoft and made so much money. In a way, they are correct, but it doesn't necessarily mean he was the smartest technically, which is what also many assume.

      I think if you got together many of the technical thinkers of our time and asked them who the 20 best computer innovators were, Gates would have a hard time on that list (as well as Jobs) and it would be filled with people whom the average guy would never have heard of. Gates' real accomplishment is being able to take other people's ideas, dumb them down, and give people a wink and a nod to make people think they are his without really lying.

    6. Re:Problem: by TheoGB · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why login when you can be an Anonymous Coward?

    7. Re:Problem: by stewbacca · · Score: 2

      How do you know that? Maybe many people admire him for building such a towering business as Microsoft.

      Precisely why most people hate him. I like his philanthropy, though.

    8. Re:Problem: by wjousts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why expel pedophiles and turn them over to the authorities when you can move them to another parish?

    9. Re:Problem: by Stooshie · · Score: 2

      " ... I think if you got together many of the technical thinkers of our time and asked them who the 20 best computer innovators were , Gates would have a hard time on that list (as well as Jobs) and it would be filled with people whom the average guy would never have heard of ... "

      Cool, fine, but that's not what the poll was asking. And they were asking a large mixture of people.

      I'm sure if you asked a bunch of astronomers or musicians or theologians who they admire most you'd get some names the average guy had never heard of.

      " ... Gates' real accomplishment is being able to take other people's ideas, dumb them down, and give people a wink and a nod to make people think they are his without really lying ... "

      Isn't that called marketing?

      And anyway, Gates did write a lot of the code on the initial builds of windows.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    10. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone up for a game of spot the Catholic?

    11. Re:Problem: by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Sure, why make a thoughtful comment when you can be a jerk.

      Because you have the papal prerogative?

    12. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What can I say? I take "spreading Christ's love" very seriously...

      -The Artist formerly known as Cardinal Ratzinger, Prefect, Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    13. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Obama is at the top and I can tell you more about what Bill Gates did to get there than I can Barak Obama.

      BO's Path to the Presidency:

      (1) Voted "Present". A lot.
      (2) Was the Democratic Presidential candidate after two terms of GWB.
      (3) Is black.

      At least, that's what some would have you to believe.

      You forgot two steps.

      0a. Born in Kenya

      0b. Came to the United States as a secret Muslim terror baby.

    14. Re:Problem: by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But Gates can make money out of feces!

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    15. Re:Problem: by fnj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not only that, but Obama is so far ahead in this poll that the others are all just a bunch of no account losers in comparison; Gates included. The message of this poll is not that Gates comes in ahead of the Pope; it's that Obama overshadows all the others put together.

    16. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please say something else than the truth because it hurts and offends me.

      There, fixed that for you.

    17. Re:Problem: by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The proles have no taste. The fact they like Billy boy is nothing to get excited about.

      Half of them probably read Ayn Rand and think they are Atlas.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    18. Re:Problem: by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Maybe many people admire him for building such a towering business as Microsoft.

      Maybe "respect for the law" is not high on many people's list of admirable qualities.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    19. Re:Problem: by DrLov3 · · Score: 2

      I came to say about the same thing parent said.

      I don't like Bill Gates personnaly but, I do agree with the summary of the article : Bill Gates > a Nazi.

    20. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been a philanthropist for longer than he was really involved in the business. Today he is probably known more for what he has done with his money than for how he made his money.

    21. Re:Problem: by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Funny

      One also needs to consider the competition. George the Clueless, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, the Clintons (both of them!!). With about three exceptions you could distill all the moral courage, integrity, and good sense of the folks on that list into a droplet about the size of an undernourished bacteria.

      Upon reviewing the list, I think there is only one conclusion. We're doomed.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    22. Re:Problem: by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      The headline should read "A poll indicates that Bill Gates may be more admired than the Pope. Polls are based on the often ill-considered responses of a few randomly called individuals. The responders are phoned and then on the spot expected to give answers immediately; they usually haven't given any serious thought or consideration to their responses. Most responders probably respond on a whim. And then we read about those polls and pretend that they actually have serious meaning. I believe that this is deeply irrational.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    23. Re:Problem: by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      I am not particular fond of Bill Gates, but when he is up against two theocrats and a professional TV troll, I think I would prefer Bill Gates too.

    24. Re:Problem: by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As opposed to releasing mosquitoes into a room that may or may not have carried the Malaria plasmodium?

      I'm sorry but I just can't stop laughing at this.

      Were there people in the room? You should probably state that. I mean "Releasing mosquitos into a room" doesn't sound all that bad. I occaisonally release my pet into the yard that may or may not have a bad odour when wet. Does that make me as evil as Bill Gates?

    25. Re:Problem: by sorak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, never underestimate the power of "Has never covered up a massive multinational paedophilia ring" on your CV...

      But everybody lies on their CV.

    26. Re:Problem: by Altesco · · Score: 2

      And then, when I saw that the #1st in the list was Barrack obama, I understood that this poll was total crap ;-)

    27. Re:Problem: by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      People BELIEVES in money, can touch it, know the hell that is having none and the heaven of having millons. In the other hand, church is no proof faith that could pay (or not, still faith needed) after you died. Probably around the same number of people admires (or at least, say in public that they do) Jobs, Zuckerberg or visible enough wildly rich people.

    28. Re:Problem: by onkelonkel · · Score: 0

      Really now? The proles don't read Ayn Rand. The proles don't read. Ayn Rand is for superior In-Tell-Lek-Shoe-Ulls like you and me.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    29. Re:Problem: by mrjb · · Score: 1

      These people just keep going on about a room that may or may not carry plasmodium. And about a yard that may or may not have a bad odour when wet. Stop it already!

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    30. Re:Problem: by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      ...most people hate him

      I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to ask for some reference on that. Most people hate Bill Gates? Why? Most people here on Slashdot, perhaps...but in the general public? I don't think so.

      Slashdot readers are passionate about technology. Most people are not. They get frustrated when their computer acts up or crashes, maybe even mutter an imprecation against Microsoft or the vendor of the software/hardware that's causing a problem - if they know what it is that's causing the problem. But for the vast majority of the day, their computers probably work.

      The dreaded car analogy - I drive a Toyota Camry. It's been super reliable for me, and I like it. I know a lot of car aficionados dislike Toyotas, and particularly the Camry, because it's bland, boring, whatever. I don't care about that. It's broken down a couple of times in the past 10 years/175000 miles, and while I don't like the inconvenience I accept that sometimes things wear out. Those one or two "outages" are by far outweighed by the years and miles of reliable, trouble-free service.

      I know about the recent issues with Toyotas, but my overall experience means I have a positive outlook on them and I even admire the company for making such a popular and generally reliable vehicle. I'd hazard a guess that if you took a poll and asked a sample of the general public why they admire Bill Gates, they'd refer to the ubiquity of Windows and Office, how he's built a dominant company from very little at all, etc. Most people probably don't even remember the court cases a few years ago - and if you remind them of it, they won't care.

      Unless they're passionate about technology. Which most people aren't.

    31. Re:Problem: by infurnus · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not as bad as people make it out to be, watch the video before making a judgement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppDWD3VwxVg Video Bill Gates/mosquitoes @ TED (unedited point segment) ~ 2-4-09

    32. Re:Problem: by N1AK · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wikileaks threatens to release private financial information, Slashdot applauses. Anon uses DOS attacks, and releases the personal details of people who downloaded adult material, Slashdot applauds. Bill Gates releases mosquitos in a room of wealthy people, in order to bring attention to one of the biggest health issues on earth, Slashdot decries it. There's nothing quite like group think for encouraging hypocrisy.

    33. Re:Problem: by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bill Gates is very intelligent. He wrote significant parts of Microsoft first set of products, he can code (or at least he could in the early 80s). In business he was a deceitful backstabbing manipulative bastard. And now his is spending billions on his philanthropy. I won't dismiss that Gates is/was an ass, but he does deserve some credit.

    34. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, that's how he made his billions in the first place...

    35. Re:Problem: by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 3, Informative

      The mosquitoes were a lab strain that hasn't been exposed to malaria in decades. Bill Gates even said during his talk that the mosquitoes weren't carrying it.

    36. Re:Problem: by richwa · · Score: 1

      I can tell you what Bill Gates did to get there -- he created an illegal monopoly (see the court records) with a crap single-user unsecured O/S and forced everyone to buy it. He also used the same approach for his Microsoft Office and other products. Even today the "Microsoft tax" is prevalent on most any non-Apple PC you buy.
      As to his benevolence -- it is part and parcel of the PR campaign started after his testimony in the monopoly lawsuit which showed Bill Gates for who he really is He was asked recently if he would use his holdings for force companies to prevent the damages they are doings (and which his donations are working to alleviate) and he said no; so much for his desire to really help.

    37. Re:Problem: by Xorlium · · Score: 1

      How do you know that? Maybe many people admire him for building such a towering business as Microsoft. Besides, take a look at the full poll (Gates comes in at position 5). Obama is at the top and I can tell you more about what Bill Gates did to get there than I can Barak Obama. And if you object to that, note that George W. Bush is in at position #2. Should either of these people be held more highly than the scientists and engineers who contribute to the knowledge of the nation, or the entrepreneurs who bring in vast amounts of wealth to it through innovative products?

      The nation? Who cares about a "nation"? Hey, I agree with your points, scientists and engineers should be admired more, but how about substituting "nation" for "world? There are humans with problems in other "countries" too.

    38. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poll's don't mean crap... I mean Bush at no.2???? The man was an alcholic that started a cruel and illegal war. But saying that I do respect Bill for stealing from the rich (Apple corp) and giving it to the masses for a cheaper price...

      Then to top it all off, he's now giving the most to charity from anyone in history (50 billion). I wonder how much Bush has given to the poorest in the world? To be honest I wonder if he can tie his own laces.

    39. Re:Problem: by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Most people admire his money, not his work, or the individual himself.

      Where's your source where you polled "most people"? I admire the man because of his contributions to the PC marketplace. I think one of the main reasons why PCs are common in homes today is because of what he was doing 20 to 30 years ago, and I admire him for that.

      I'm using the literal definition of "PC", I don't use it to mean "Windows computer". I think the main reason why personal computers are so prevalent is because of Microsoft and Gates specifically.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    40. Re:Problem: by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      But any of the attendees might have been, which means he arranged a nice way to spread it. I don't think that is likely, but I don't think that incident even rates in the top 10 things this guy is responsible for.

    41. Re:Problem: by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Saying or doing something different from what someone else said or did is not hypocrisy. Thus, "hypocrisy" is not a word you would ever use to describe Slashdot (or any other collective group of people) if you understand what the word actually means. When the actions of Slashdot users are inconsistent with the actions of Slashdot users, this isn't hypocrisy, it's a demonstration of the mythological status of the "group think" you speak of. It's not that there aren't Slashdot users who hold all the views and display all the actions you cite, it's just there's also ones who display the opposite, and there's nothing even slightly odd, inconsistent, or hypocritical about that.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    42. Re:Problem: by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Look at copies sold and then think about that.

    43. Re:Problem: by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So stealing then giving away most of what you stole makes up for it?

      I am not saying it does or does not, just wondering how that you reconcile these actions.

    44. Re:Problem: by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      You think the masses have read Atlas Shrugged? Ha! If they have read anything of Rand's (and that is a stretch), the most likely culprit would be Anthem, as it is far, far, shorter and easier to read.

      --
      SSC
    45. Re:Problem: by kmdrtako · · Score: 1

      yeah, rooms are nefarious carriers of Malaria plasmodium.

      I presume that most people who aren't grammar pedants knew from the context that it was the mosquitoes that may or may not have had plasmodium.

    46. Re:Problem: by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Gates' real accomplishment is being able to take other people's ideas, dumb them down, and give people a wink and a nod to make people think they are his without really lying.

      Sort of. I don't think the average person cares very much about originality in the products they buy. No one buys a Toyota because they think Toyota invented the car or, for that matter, any of its principal components. We're talking about people who don't know what an operating system is in the first place. I rather suspect the average person admires Bill Gates because he became fantastically rich without running an international drug cartel, and that's about it.

      That he's more popular than the Pope in a country where Catholics are a minority really shouldn't come as much of a surprise, either. Even if the church wasn't embroiled in its current set of scandals, it would be quite odd if several people weren't more popular than the Pope. You'd probably get very different results in a predominately Catholic country. Nothing shocking about that.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    47. Re:Problem: by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      Most people have engaged in illegal activity. Here are some common examples:

      • Speeding
      • Underage drinking
      • Providing alcohol to a minor
      • Not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign
      • Using marijuana

      With that in mind, it shouldn't surprise you that people don't have respect for the law.

      --
      SSC
    48. Re:Problem: by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      And now his is spending billions on his philanthropy.

      Well sort of. His billions, those in the foundation at least, are invested anywhere and everywhere with a ROI in mind. The interest and tax-free profits thereof are in turn given away. Well, not to Africa, but rather to pharma companies whose investors share interests with Bill Gates. These pharma companies give drugs and aid to Africans. But only if the nation agree to abide by US IP laws so that they can't go buy cheap generic versions when Gates money moves elsewhere.

      The Gates Foundation is probably doing real meaningful good in the world. But there are shady backroom deals going on with it.

    49. Re:Problem: by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      ...most people hate him

      I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to ask for some reference on that. ...

      When you're the center of the universe, you can determine what "most people" think via introspection. ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    50. Re:Problem: by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      Well, almost everyone has experienced a system crash or BSOD or similar computer failure. I can't even count the number of times I've heard non-technical people curse Bill Gates when their application crashed, whether it is an MS product or not.

      When Toyota had its brake issue recently, did you ever hear anyone blame the company founder? Have you ever heard anyone blame Kiichiro Toyoda when their car had to be taken to the shop?

      A large amount of people legitimately blame Bill Gates for everything that goes wrong on their computer, and hate him for that. Slashdotters hate him because of his business ethics. Some people hate him for the simple reason that he is rich. I don't know if "most" people hate him, but a lot do.

    51. Re:Problem: by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Maybe "respect for the law" is not high on many people's list of admirable qualities.

      Is that even questionable? Might be an American thing... we love our outlaws.

      /me hums Judas Priest's "Breaking The Law".

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    52. Re:Problem: by hedwards · · Score: 0

      The GP is correct, rather than actually try to do something about the child molesters, he opted to blame gay priests for it. Personally, I don't respect a religious leader that seems to think that it's OK to make political hay out of people that have been sexually abused.

      Rather than just admit what everybody else knows, that the Catholic Church was encouraging and supporting known child molesters in their organization. It's not something that is at this point under any meaningful question, it's pretty well established, it's just an issue of exactly how bad is it. Owning up to it with some steps to eliminate the problem in the future would likely have gained him a lot of respect.

      Even if one did buy the concept of gay priests molesting children, then how the fuck does he explain priests molesting girls?

    53. Re:Problem: by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Which just goes to show how retarded the poll actually is.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    54. Re:Problem: by hedwards · · Score: 1

      As much as I despise the way he got that money, I don't think that I can say with any degree of honesty, that I don't respect what he's doing with it.

    55. Re:Problem: by Arccot · · Score: 1

      Wikileaks threatens to release private financial information, Slashdot applauses. Anon uses DOS attacks, and releases the personal details of people who downloaded adult material, Slashdot applauds. Bill Gates releases mosquitos in a room of wealthy people, in order to bring attention to one of the biggest health issues on earth, Slashdot decries it. There's nothing quite like group think for encouraging hypocrisy.

      Why be accurate when you can generalize incorrectly to get a point across, eh? I hope you aren't in a research field.

    56. Re:Problem: by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      What? In what way can you even begin to interpret what I said in that way?

    57. Re:Problem: by morari · · Score: 1

      Well, let's be fair. Most people use Windows everyday. Bill Gates is at least somewhat responsible for that.

      On the other hand, no one really has any use for what the Pope or Glenn Beck are selling. In fact, the world would be a lot better off without them in general.

      It's kind of a skewed statement, given that Gates is being compared to people that absolutely should not be admired. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    58. Re:Problem: by tycoex · · Score: 1

      It looks good when compared to what other rich people do: stealing and keeping it all for themselves.

    59. Re:Problem: by twebb72 · · Score: 1

      Many people simply assume that he has to be smart in order to have created Microsoft and made so much money.

      I'm willing to bet it takes more smarts than #2 on the list (George W.)

    60. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more admired than Glenn Beck...and I'm just some Anonymous Coward!

    61. Re:Problem: by Surt · · Score: 0

      I don't know, he might be responsible for more deaths by now.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    62. Re:Problem: by kikito · · Score: 1

      "Does that make me as evil as Bill Gates?"

      No, it makes you Srödinger-y.

    63. Re:Problem: by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Link They are doing alot with innovating products.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    64. Re:Problem: by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Right...they were carrying malaria. ::V-8 headslap::

    65. Re:Problem: by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      I think if you got together many of the technical thinkers of our time and asked them who the 20 best computer innovators were, Gates would have a hard time on that list ...

      Well that's true for the pope as well ...

    66. Re:Problem: by Surt · · Score: 1

      Because it's the right thing to do. The pope is infallible, so it must have been right. Since it was right, it must have been what God wanted. Apparently, God is pro-pedophile.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    67. Re:Problem: by Surt · · Score: 1

      I interpreted you the same way. You said:

      "In business he was a deceitful backstabbing manipulative bastard. "
          Which I take to mean: Bill Gates is evil. (With which I agree). It does take a little bit of interpretation on those actions to conclude that he therefore stole most of his money. But it's not a far leap.

      You then state:
      "And now his is spending billions on his philanthropy. I won't dismiss that Gates is/was an ass, but he does deserve some credit."

      So he gets credit for giving away a portion of what he took from others through backstabbing and manipulation. Personally, I don't think so. He can get credit from me when he's given away ALL but the fairly earned portion. When he has under a billion left, let me know.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    68. Re:Problem: by slim · · Score: 2

      The dogma of papal infallibility is widely misunderstood.

      According to the Catholic church, only papal pronouncements made ex cathedra are covered by papal infallibility. That is to say, in order for it to apply, he has to make a big deal about making A Pronouncement. See Wikipedia.

      So the Pope can lose pub quizzes without invalidating his own claimed role.

      (I'm an atheist by the way)

    69. Re:Problem: by MBC1977 · · Score: 1

      Why would he have a hard time on that list? I think the real genius of Gates is that he could not only understand the technology he also understood business (something most technical types dislike/abhor/ do not want to be involved in). Like I wrote in a case study a few months ago, Kildall (as an example) was definitely one of your "average guys" who could have been great. But he chose not to (we could argue the semantics later).

      The bottom line is the poll asked Americans (which included more than the technical thinkers). Regardless of your or my opinion, Gates is a popular guy (who is bloody rich to boot).

      --
      Regards,

      MBC1977,
    70. Re:Problem: by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Informative

      Look at copies sold and then think about that.

      I think you count on most of those being unfinished doorstops and many of them being unstarted doorstops.
      Rand is rabidly anti-religion but you never hear the citizens of Beckistan mention that.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    71. Re:Problem: by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      How many copies of the Bible exist, and how many people have actually READ the whole thing cover to cover?

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    72. Re:Problem: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot or other FOSS circles. See, Americans worship money, and they worship people who have money. BillG is like a god to them.

    73. Re:Problem: by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      That's why he is more admired than the Pope. Bill Gates is Jesus Christ!

      --
      Balderdash!
    74. Re:Problem: by syousef · · Score: 1

      But Gates can make money out of feces!

      That's funny because I admire feces more than BIll Gates and the Pope.

      1. Feces
      2. BIll Gates
      3. The Pope

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    75. Re:Problem: by syousef · · Score: 1

      The mosquitoes were a lab strain that hasn't been exposed to malaria in decades. Bill Gates even said during his talk that the mosquitoes weren't carrying it.

      It's still not alright to expose people to discomfort or potential harm just to make a point. He's a fuckhead.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    76. Re:Problem: by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But information wants to be free! Why shouldn't insects have the same aspirations? You're speciesist, you are.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    77. Re:Problem: by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You think the masses have read Atlas Shrugged?

      Even though we have an aging population, I doubt most of them have been alive long enough.

      It does sort of go on a bit, doesn't it?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    78. Re:Problem: by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Hey at least the pope got a catchy song out of it! The closest thing old Bill got to a catchy song was the Ballmer Monkey going "WOOOO!" and bouncing around the stage yelling developers like a silverback on crack. Does anyone else miss old Bill? I miss old Bill, he had that "evil uber nerd" thing down pat. I always pictured him muttering to himself when he crushed a competitor "Yeah! That's what you get for stuffing me in those lockers in junior high school! Who's the shrimp now huh?" while his flunkies tried to blend into the wallpaper to avoid his wrath.

      Now that old Bill is gone and Steve is probably in his last days it just isn't the same. In the old days you had such great arguments, with the Apple guys sneering down their noses at the beige boxes while the PC guys made fun of the crazy Apple prices...sigh. Google VS Windows VS Linux just doesn't have the same zing. Google is data mining so much info their knowledge of everyone's business and personal lives makes Ballmer look like a sweaty Care Bear, but you have to give them credit for pulling the wool over the FOSSies by saying they are FOSS friendly while simultaneously keeping Android GPL V2 so the corps can TiVo the hell out of it. Then finally you have Linux which is just...meh. Sure it gets a little better every year, but without a Jobs or Gates to really hog the spotlight and drive sales it is pretty much flat as far as growth.

      We just don't have the great figures of evil in tech anymore. Ballmer is the lite beer of evil, half the calories and a total buzz killer, I doubt Jobs will be coming back and Cook just doesn't have the "I am God" attitude that made Jobs great, and RMS going to Cuba and hanging out in South America with Chavez just comes across as a naive hippie. Where is the great evil CEOs of the tech world? Where are those that inspire great loyalty and hatred? Larry Ellison? bah, he comes off as more batshit insane than anything else. Those that come after us simply won't have the great uber evil CEOs of the tech world, instead it'll be get rich quick and get out flash in the pans like Mark Zuckerberg. Bah, it just ain't fun anymore.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    79. Re:Problem: by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      information wants to be free like gas wants to expand.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    80. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact he admitted of having built MSN

    81. Re:Problem: by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      If that were the extent of his accomplishments (tongue in cheek), I don't think he'd compare that well to the Pope. Although he was a sneaky and ruthless bastard as a businessperson, he's actually a better person as a philanthropist.

      Of course, it would be easier to paint him in a better light if he's a philanthropist than if he's a tycoon...

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    82. Re:Problem: by fnj · · Score: 1

      Even if you don't like the results, it's not the POLL that's retarded :) :) :)

    83. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Precisely why most people hate him. I like his philanthropy, though.

      Oh, puleez...Bill Gates and philanthropy don't belong in the same sentence.

      Heard about M$ and child slavery? Apparently, despite billions in the bank, they won't pay decent wages and prefer child slaves:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/microsoft/7597344/Microsoft-accused-of-using-teenage-slave-labour-to-build-Xboxes-in-China.html

      Or how about taking peoples homes? Or environmental destruction? The list goes on and on. Bill Gates apparently said that it was "too difficult" to invest ethically, etc.
      http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gatesx7jan07-sg,0,261331.storygallery

      Bill Gates and philanthropy...more like a definition of oxymoron.

    84. Re:Problem: by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      They were all male. Male mosquitos only feed on plant nectar.

    85. Re:Problem: by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      It wasn't too long ago Obama spent a couple hundred mill toward getting people to check the box next to his name. I don't find it inordinately surprising that they're still doing it.

    86. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer

      Good. I'd hate to think a whole corporation could be that dumb.

    87. Re:Problem: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Precisely why most people hate him.

      Many techies hate him, but go ask people who only use computers rather than hack them... you'll see the attitude is very different there.

    88. Re:Problem: by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      The headline should read "A poll indicates that Bill Gates may be more admired than the Pope. Polls are based on the often ill-considered responses of a few randomly called individuals.

      According to the article, respondents are all adults living in the continental US and (obviously) have a telephone.

      In general, I've always though Gallup's polling methodology is very sound. But some sampling biases are inevitable with telephone polling. What I didn't know until just now, is that Gallup pollsters will randomize respondents within the household by asking to speak with the person with the most recent birthday. That's a neat method of pseudo-randomization, but not perfect.

    89. Re:Problem: by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Good god, shut up you moron.

    90. Re:Problem: by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      He didn't steal jack shit. Your premise is risible.

    91. Re:Problem: by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase...the reason many people hate him are for precisely the reason mentioned above.

      I didn't mean to say most, as in more people than not, only meant to say of the people who really dislike him, the main reason is he made a fortune of swindling millions of users into using his mostly mediocre products.

      I know saying "of the people who don't like him, most don't like him because..." is a complete tautology, and isn't what I meant, but is how it reads.

      In my circles, "most" people indeed dislike Bill Gates. In my neophyte-in-laws-circle it is also "most" people, but for different reasons. I suppose there is a large segment of non-techy pro-business people who laud the success of Bill Gates as a business man and they are big enough that saying "most" people hate Bill Gates is probably inaccurate.

    92. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't get the Ayn Rand haters on this site. Did she push some of your buttons or something? She hitting too close to the mark? Have you *actually read* Atlas Shrugged?

      I'm halfway through, and it just drones on and on... If that's your complain with her, fine, good point. But if it's her politics, let's hear a little intelligent dissection and analysis of the concepts she argues that go beyond the standard leftist "RAWR, AYN RAND IS A DIRTY, RAVING WHORE! DON'T READ HER, YOUR MIND WILL SPLODE!"

    93. Re:Problem: by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Better not give any ideas, the manure industry could have a shakeup if it went to a commodities market.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    94. Re:Problem: by Starcub · · Score: 1

      Hey, never underestimate the power of "Has never covered up a massive multinational paedophilia ring" on your CV...

      Yeah, apparently "Cheated on his wife and lie to everyone about it." would have worked much better!

      As for the pope, he admitted the problem and gave pedophile priests the smack down. He also addressed the root of the problem at the seminary level.

      As for the top 3 on that list, only one is physically capable of admitting fault, and I don't think any of them honestly do anything to fix the messes they create.

      At least the pope didn't preside over an institution that sunk the world into a multinational crisis; the pope's constituency is still quite healthy. Did they restrict this poll to members of wall street, or is this country really becoming a mental institution?

    95. Re:Problem: by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      "They were all male. Male mosquitos only feed on plant nectar."

      Doh! I should have mentioned that. It's only the female mosquitoes that need and can take a blood meal. It's important for the development of the eggs; no blood meal means no eggs (except for a few species that I can't remember right now that can deposit a first batch of eggs without a blood meal). It's also trivially easy to identify and separate adult mosquitoes based on sex: a short time on ice or a chill plate renders them immobile and the male mosquitoes have very large and bushy antennae while female mosquitoes have much smaller, stick-like antennae. This difference is readily apparent to the unaided eye.

    96. Re:Problem: by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Wow, people sure are butthurt. Gates has done more good than every single poster here put together.

    97. Re:Problem: by toadlife · · Score: 1

      I mean Bush at no.2????

      Maybe the poll included Africans. Bush might've been a idiot warmongering fuckwit of a president, but he did do a lot to help fight AIDS in Africa.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    98. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's not water to wine, it's corn to gold?

    99. Re:Problem: by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of his philanthropy. If you look at the actions, and trace the money, not so much

      --
      This is blinging
    100. Re:Problem: by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      So stealing then giving away most of what you stole makes up for it?

      I have no idea, but it worked for Robin Hood.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    101. Re:Problem: by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. But I consciously wrote "nation" because the poll was explicitly American. I find it hard to imagine George W. Bush placing second in France or Germany (or Iraq) for example. It was a poll for Americans, by Americans.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    102. Re:Problem: by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      And you get modded a troll for your efforts.. group think re-reinforces itself again -- death to those who think different!

    103. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain why Obama was leading the poll...

    104. Re:Problem: by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      Well sort of. His billions, those in the foundation at least, are invested anywhere and everywhere with a ROI in mind. The interest and tax-free profits thereof are in turn given away.

      That is how you create a foundation that will survive more than a few years before running out of money. It is a sustainable solution to the problem of requiring a constant source of money to give away each year. Unfortunately because this is about Bill Gates, people look at this as if it was some evil tax scam rather than the standard way that perpetual trusts outlive their main benefactors.

      As for only giving their money away to pharmaceutical companies, I would like to see a citation for that. Health and agricultural development only account for part of what this foundation gives away. Why would money be given to a drug company under the guise of providing clean water?

    105. Re:Problem: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Apparently because the Vatican ordered you not to...

      Yup, 1997 and they were still pretending that their precious "canon law", which has all the legal standing of the list of rules in some kid's clubhouse, takes precedence over civil punishment of known child rapists.

    106. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite credential is: Time Magazine person of the year, 2006.

    107. Re:Problem: by adolf · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, there is only one male for every [insert huge number here*] females. Female mosquitoes annoy me, and so I kill them, but only when it is convenient to do so or when I find one that is actively eating me. Males, on the other hand: When I spot one of those, I hunt it until it is destroyed, hopefully killing untold thousands of potential offspring.

      *: While I've heard different ratios, from 1:100 to 1:1000, I'm unable to find a reference that seems worthwhile.

    108. Re:Problem: by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 2

      Well from rearing Aedes aegypti (yellow fever mosquito) under laboratory conditions, they're about 1:1. I'm just a biochemist and not an entomologist, but that's my observations. In the wild it seems to me that the females must risk more by feeding off warm-blooded animals, but there might be a compensating mechanism for balancing the sex ratio.

      Heh. You can sex the pupae based off of size: the females are bigger than the males and you can get them with ~95% accuracy. There is a difference in 4th instar larvae as well but I can't spot it, according to my advisor it can be done but only by about two people on the friggin' planet.

    109. Re:Problem: by adolf · · Score: 2

      Yes. And the one reference I did find (https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/1811/3714/1/V49N05_188.pdf) tends to support your own findings.

      I haven't found anything about the male/female ratio of adult mosquitoes in the wild.

      Nonetheless, in the summertime, I fairly frequently find females in my house as they creep through open doors and holes in the screens. I very seldom find a male.

      Perhaps it is something to do with life expectancy (do males live shorter lives?), or attraction (obviously, males have no reason to be drawn toward mammals as females are).

      I didn't get to breed mosquitoes in school, and my day job is quite well-detached from that concept, so I guess further research is in order. But if killing a solitary male does no real harm to the population, then there's no point in actively hunting them -- especially since they can't eat me.

      It sure would make summertime parties much less fun if the impromptu male mosquito hunt were excluded, though. :(

    110. Re:Problem: by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know what goes through his head when he is deciding if he should make a Pronouncement. In theory God makes him aware that it is the word of God and thus infallible, but in reality there must be some kind of concious decision making process going on. He has to ask himself if his Pronouncement is ever likely to be proven wrong. There must be political considerations too.

      I wonder if he actually convinces himself that God put the idea in his head and made him decide one way or another. The Pope isn't an unintelligent man and to get to that position he must be a proficient political animal. Just how far does the delusion go?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    111. Re:Problem: by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      Catchy song? How about 14 million record sales after the Beatles (We're more popular than Jesus) broke up John Lennon?

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    112. Re:Problem: by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      As for only giving their money away to pharmaceutical companies, I would like to see a citation for that.

      Except that I never said they only gave to pharmaceutical companies. They give a million out here and there to all sorts of things. But asking for citations is well within your right.

      But, uh, do you really expect me to audit something like that? Do you really expect ANYONE to be able to do that?
      But here you go. There's a lot of stuff there. But notice the bulk goes towards HIV researchers and a foundation for immunizations. Huh, and they really have put a lot of money towards schools. Well there you go I guess.
      How dare you get me to educate myself. The fact of my post stands however.

    113. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now his is spending billions on his philanthropy. I won't dismiss that Gates is/was an ass, but he does deserve some credit.

      You seem to be overlooking the fact that 5% of the $80B-worth of B&MGF money goes to philanthropy while the other 95% is going directly into companies whose actions negate 100% of the philanthropy. As such the philanthropy is nothing but a PR tactic with no real merit (outside of PR obviously).

    114. Re:Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's right though. How many Blue Screen of Deaths has there been! How many Red Ring of Deaths have there been!!

  2. Duh by chemicaldave · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are only 68 million Catholics in the US according to wikipedia. How many Windows users are there?

    1. Re:Duh by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      I was raised devout Catholic. I got over it.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I want to love my country-- and in many ways I do, but to think that there is even one person out there who thinks that a Chicago politician should receive more "high esteem and respect" than the Dali Lama or the Pope makes me feel like we've lost something.

      I just have to remember that these numbers represent the people that are stupid enough, or have enough free time, to waste an evening on a phone call survey. These are people who aren't on do not call lists, enjoy taking surveys, or freely answer questions when cold called.

    3. Re:Duh by pmarinus · · Score: 1

      But after using Windows how many still admire Bill Gates?

    4. Re:Duh by chemicaldave · · Score: 0

      How many Americans do you think have even heard of the Dalai Lama, let alone know who he is and what he does.

    5. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pope Palpatine helped cover up priests molesting kids. If JP2 was still alive the results would probably have been different.

    6. Re:Duh by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      You need to study your theology. Continuous implementation of new ideas. Slowly. And always with claiming its Gods will and its always been that way. But by no means the same codebase. Things like no married priests and stealing all the pagan holidays for themselves (christmas, etc) are much more recent than 2000 years. Think "GNU hurd" speed not "Linux" speed. Cathedral vs bazzar, literally.

      Now if you want programming analogies, try codebase forks like the protestant revolution and holy wars like vi vs emacs.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Duh by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Windows still seems like its not out of Beta as well....

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    8. Re:Duh by grub · · Score: 1


      I hear Richard Stallman is changing his name to GNU/Jesus.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    9. Re:Duh by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Thing is, when they really started adding new features in earnest during the Renaissance, some guys (like Martin Luther and Henry VIII) started getting so pissed off about that they forked the project. This led to a highly fragmented market and conflicts almost as bad as the Unix Wars.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    10. Re:Duh by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Admire is not the same as like. There's some kind of sick admiration due to someone who convinces people to buy Windows ME, and then later manages to convince the same people to buy Vista...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Duh by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      And it wasn't that long ago that someone was considered unelectable as president if they were a Catholic. The Catholic church has never been that popular in America due to our Protestant founders.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    12. Re:Duh by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Penitent: Lord, have mercy upon me, a sinner.

      GNU/God: RTFM.

    13. Re:Duh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why the inherent veneration of anybody whose followers can draw a halo around their heads?

      The Dali Lama, while he certainly strikes me as a nice, chill kind of guy, totally wouldn't mind having some people like him in the neighborhood, is a living PR machine on a scale that makes any president look like a piker: "Hey little kid, we've determined, by the traditions handed down through centuries of theocratic feudalism, that you are the reincarnated Lama." "Ok, so, I guess that I get to live in exile and jet-set around making serene and innoffensive to everyone except the Chinese statements about freedom and human dignity and stuff, with somebody else picking up the bill?" "Yeah, pretty much. As long as you aren't a total prick about it, you'll come out smelling like roses."

      And the Pope? Our current bishop of Rome is, undoubtedly, a smart guy; but he is a pure reactionary water-carrier(and probable un-indicted criminal for his work during his 'congregation for the doctrine of the faith' days) for an organization that freely veers between covering up criminality and giving terrible health and family planning advice to desperately poor people. For fun, he occasionally appears in a cloth-of-gold robe on the steps of his gigantic marble live-in-museum-of-priceless-art to give a talk on how charity is a virtue and money-hungry atheism is a scourge upon the world.

      I am deeply under-impressed with our current president, as I was sort of hoping to move away from our policies of unending foreign adventurism and unrestrained abuses by ever-multiplying clandestine agencies; but the idea that the Dali Lama or Pope deserve much in the way of respect and esteem seems pretty dodgy.

    14. Re:Duh by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is why they added a plugin architecture and an app store:

      As long as a given saint or ritual has been approved by the Vatican for compatibility with the main codebase, any catholic individual or institution is free to snap it in to his/her/its devotional architecture, with each addition delivering its own fresh and exciting mixture of content, sightseeing destinations, and spiritual services.

      (and, in practice, their is fairly broad acceptance of those catholics who, looking for a leaner, less resource-hungry, faith, use 'cLite' or similar tools to strip theoretically-required-but-architecturally-optional modules out of the base install.)

    15. Re:Duh by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Penitent: Lord, have mercy upon me, a sinner.

      GNU/God: RTFM.

      ... and readeth ye not a manpage, nor HTML, nor a PDF. But the righteous among you shall only RTFM with this bizarre curses console app I bequeath to thee, which ye shall know as "info".

    16. Re:Duh by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      You need to study your theology. Continuous implementation of new ideas. Slowly.

      Too damn slow.

      Wake me up when Rome deems it acceptable for Africans to use latex.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    17. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admire is not the same as like.

      Pardon me if English is not your first language, but the word admire is commonly used to provide a positive connotation along with the idea of "respect"

      From Random House:

      -verb (used with object)
      1. to regard with wonder, pleasure, or approval.

      The common second definition is to hold in "high esteem" or "respect".

      To say that to respect is not to like would be fine, but using the word admire is to say that you not only respect, but approve or take a liking to that individual as well.

    18. Re:Duh by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      Your description of the Dalai Lama is probably the best I have ever read.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    19. Re:Duh by marcobat · · Score: 1

      Actually the 2000 years old code was already very well tested and had been shared by all the mystics of previous times. With recurring small updates it is still used by mystics of current times. That code has little to do with the catholic church code that entered early alpha stage a few hundred years later when the religion was instituted. At that time the catholics used the original code (which, i'm sure, was open source) and branch it into a close source project diverting the original goal of the program (seek good for all people), into a new goal (good for us and that's it)!

    20. Re:Duh by LoudMusic · · Score: 1
      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    21. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beta products are usually buggy or incomplete. Windows fails to meet that description unless you are using terribly broken drivers.

    22. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if you want programming analogies...

      Any chance of a car analogy?

    23. Re:Duh by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Things like no married priests and stealing all the pagan holidays for themselves (christmas, etc) are much more recent than 2000 years

      When looking at what can be known about my local paganism (and pre-Christian folk customs, generally) on one hand, and mainstream Christianity of X century (the time of "National Baptism" myth(1)) on the other ...it's not at all clear which one is closer to present folk religion (at my place - one held very dear by the Vatican; and no wonder: officially one of very few strongly Catholic places in the EU (more than Italy), considering itself "the bulwark of Christianity"(2), from where the previous Pope was...).

      Yes, basics of Abrahamic mythology (nothing exhaustive) are there, as well as story of Messiah - they are not the only ones though, and I can't really name any Church holiday which doesn't revolve largely around old customs. A few which are straight continuation, which aren't even particularly observed elsewhere, particularly with quite non-Christian approach to the dead. Or, my favorite: rules of placement for chapels, crosses, holy springs and copses(!!!) largely follow old rules.

      (1) When looking at simple number of priests, parishes, and basic demographic data - it's very clear the Christianization wasn't even really seriously attempted until ~XVII century. A mass once or two times a year, in foreign language, was the best a typical peasant could count on for a long time. And why do even XVIII century sermons (the ones written down and preserved, so not even particularly provincial) quite often condemn "pagan superstitions" among the people?

      ...which brings us to (2) forgetfulness about Pagan Reaction in XI century. When Christian king had to escape, few present churches were destroyed (guess what happened to the clergy...), old temples restored at the same / their old grounds. Not for long of course - the king returned and restored proper Christian order with the help of warriors borrowed from the Holy Roman Emperor (but don't tell that to the most fervently faithful, they usually don't like Germans much, they get confused...)

      The best part: three+ centuries later, it didn't stop an alliance with openly pagan Lithuania (throw in a number of local Muslims too - Tatars) against a "northern crusade" of sorts / basically against large part of Western Europe. This one people remember and cherish (one of few epic military victories). Yup, "the bulwark of Christianity"...

      And it doesn't seem particularly unusual. However strong are the denials, Catholicisms ... Christianity ... indeed any religion is mostly an exercise at syncretism.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    24. Re:Duh by sorak · · Score: 1

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      I was raised devout Catholic. I got over it.

      So are you implying the Catholic Church is run by Google? Thank FSM I'm not Catholic. I don't want them selling my confessions to the highest bidder.

    25. Re:Duh by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And it wasn't that long ago that someone was considered unelectable as president if they were a Catholic

      I don't think there was even one who wasn't assassinated while in office?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    26. Re:Duh by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      no married priests? This week I read on a newspaper (it is in reuters too) that anglican priests becoming catholic stay married.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    27. Re:Duh by houghi · · Score: 1

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta.

      So if I follow correctly, Judaism was Alpha as they came before Beta, Further then Muslim is the latest update of that.

      After all, they follow the same $DEITY, but based on newer versions of rules.

      (Now _I_ don't even know if it is funny, trolling or insightful.)

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    28. Re:Duh by sorak · · Score: 1

      There are only 68 million Catholics in the US according to wikipedia. How many Windows users are there?

      That says something. The fact that there aren't more non-Catholic admirers of the pope says one of two things:

      1. The pope hasn't done much to earn admiration.
      2. We're all bigots.

      I suspect that the first explanation is more accurate.

    29. Re:Duh by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Just a rare occurrence of exception handling.

      (you don't think any of them would "convert" otherwise? Relatively few Eastern Catholics don't change much / they are predominantly in places where Catholicism isn't dominating, any discouragement must also be avoided)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    30. Re:Duh by Avatar8 · · Score: 1

      Actually I'd say Windows users would have Bill on their s#!t list, not the admire list. In fact I'd have to extrapolate that the people polled were not in the IT industry, do not use Windows computer and probably don't read any technical journal or blog.

    31. Re:Duh by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You probably have to throw in somewhere Zoroastrianism, Aristotelian philosophy, Mithraism, countless local paganisms (one notable group being those brought into and blended in Rome) ... heck, it's hopeless.

      And even how Bahá'í Faith (not Islam) is probably closest to next full update doesn't have to mean anything. Curiously, it's somewhat persecuted; particularly in its cradle (among few other places). Seems reasonably decent (so far), but that doesn't determine the outcomes in what is essentially an evolutionary process / selection / the fittest traits go on. Too bad it happens too slow for "we'll see where it goes" to have any meaning vs. the length of our lifetimes (and is the main reason for conviction in "Unchanging Truths")

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    32. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      I was raised devout Catholic. I got over it.

      If you by Catholicism mean the Roman-Catholic Church (there are and have existed several churches that claim to be the one true Catholic church), they did a complete code rewrite in the 1250's, so the code base is only about 750 years old (and they have introduced some major changes since then). They also did a complete complete code rewrite in the 8th century and in the 1030-80's. The code has also branched into several projects, but they all merge code from each other like crazy. Not only has the code been rewritten several times, there is, basically, no functionality left from the original application. Functionality like Reincarnation and Jesus as a Prophet (the carnage son of Maria and Joseph, an "ordinary" human being and the foremost prophet of Yahweh and the Messiah) has totally been removed and replaced with Heaven&Hell/Afterlife and The Holy Trinity (Jesus as the son of Maria and, eh, the Holy Spirit, and as God incarnated, and a totally new definition of what a Messiah is).

    33. Re:Duh by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Islam was more of a "Patch Tuesday" thing that ended up breaking a lot of things. Unfortunately, it didn't come with an uninstall feature.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    34. Re:Duh by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Well, those are new-ish features, granted, just not earth shaking. Kind of like Buddy Christ. More of a repackaging of old than creation of new.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    35. Re:Duh by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      > They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago.

      Catholicism: the BSD of religion.

    36. Re:Duh by hedwards · · Score: 2

      The Dali Lama, while he certainly strikes me as a nice, chill kind of guy, totally wouldn't mind having some people like him in the neighborhood, is a living PR machine on a scale that makes any president look like a piker: "Hey little kid, we've determined, by the traditions handed down through centuries of theocratic feudalism, that you are the reincarnated Lama." "Ok, so, I guess that I get to live in exile and jet-set around making serene and innoffensive to everyone except the Chinese statements about freedom and human dignity and stuff, with somebody else picking up the bill?" "Yeah, pretty much. As long as you aren't a total prick about it, you'll come out smelling like roses."

      Obviously you've got no clue as to the culture you're dealing with. The Chinese are a people that are very concerned with saving face, which is why you so often see the government throwing people in prison for saying the sorts of things that the Dali Lama is saying. There's a cultural expectation that the Chinese government is trying to enforce of harmony, even if it means that the people have to do without freedom. The sorts of comments that the Dali Lama has made are not ones that would offend a more balanced regime, but one so concerned with the appearance of harmony it's a serious threat. There's also the concern of social unrest and revolution when the people get tired to being pushed around and revolt.

      As opposed to President Obama who was granted a Nobel Peace Prize for being elected President of the US, the Dali Lama actually had to earn his. He's done a remarkable amount of good for it.

    37. Re:Duh by imgod2u · · Score: 1

      Catholicism also uses 14 bit signed numbers to keep track of years in history. Consequently, they think that 8192 B.C. is the beginning of time and refuse to believe otherwise.

    38. Re:Duh by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago

      I thought the entire argument with the reformers was that they werent, and that they were adding new features.

    39. Re:Duh by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      Yeah. They've never released the Bible in the common tongue. They've never held mass in the common tongue either. Oh, wait. Hell, the Catholic Bible itself isn't even a millenia old.
       

      I was raised devout Catholic. I got over it.

      So was, and did, I. But unlike you, I didn't take that as a reason to be grossly ignorant of the Church and it's history.

    40. Re:Duh by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      "You need to study your theology. Continuous implementation of new ideas."

      LOL! Theology is nothing but inventing lame excuses for lame myths. Courtier's reply sums it quite nicely: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/12/the_courtiers_reply.php

      Theology was not able to adequately answer even the simplest questions: "Why there is evil?", "Why there are different religions?", "Should we rely on faith rather than facts?".

      In this regard theology is even worse than philosophy (I'm not including theology as a part of philosophy), as the philosophy can be somewhat excused because it lacks the clear object to study.

    41. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did an upgrade where you don't go to hell for eating meat on Friday anymore.

    42. Re:Duh by balbus000 · · Score: 1

      So Windows is Catholicism, Unix is Protestantism, and Apple is...Scientology?

    43. Re:Duh by Markvs · · Score: 1

      Another thing, Catholicism never got out of beta. They are still working on the same code base as 2000 years ago. Can't keep people's attentions if you don't add new features.

      I was raised devout Catholic. I got over it.

      Beta?! We're on at least Catholicism 4.0 between the First Vatican Council, the Second Vatican Council, and the Council of Trent!

      --
      46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
    44. Re:Duh by tokul · · Score: 1

      How many Windows users are there?

      Windows users never got the chance to vote. Their votes were dismissed as biased or ballots were invalidated after somebody put different f words on Bill's option.

    45. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, its the installed base, folks. the catholic church has created some really great software (chardin, berrigan, etc), but are slow to implement, as they must not abandon their base, who 1000 years ago were living in frozen mud and sculpting jews suckling on pigs teats in their churches. microsoft has their DOS, the Church has their Middle Ages. They kept the source code to themselves (no translations of the bible into anything but latin for a long time), and working groups that came up with new ideas were likely not allowed to bring product to market. Its actually the cathedral vs bazaar argument here.

    46. Re:Duh by mwolfe38 · · Score: 1

      Wow you don't need to be religious to know about vatican I and vatican II.. Does the word Reformation ring a bell? You were raised catholic but apparently you slept through those english masses! Maybe latin would have done you better. That being said, the Catholic Church needs to make some more changes to keep followers.. No birth control, seriously??

    47. Re:Duh by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      They actually didn't really make any major changes until after the reformation, that is why the changes in catholic church are known as the counter-reformation.

    48. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to study your theology. Continuous implementation of new ideas. Slowly. And always with claiming its Gods will and its always been that way.

      But we've always been at war with Middle Eastasia!

    49. Re:Duh by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      It hasn't been "implementation of new ideas", but submission to user demands. No development, only fixing the code to please the user-base!

      --
      This is blinging
    50. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sacrament of marriage can't come after the sacrament of holy orders, and married men aren't allowed in the seminaries where they would eventually receive holy orders. But, converting directly from another religion allowed them to receive holy orders.

      It's actually pretty straightforward. The solution to 'no married priests' is to allow married men into the seminaries.

      The word 'seminary' sounds dirty. Maybe letting normal people in would make it less so.

    51. Re:Duh by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Can't understand what your beef with the Dalai Lama is. Would you respect him more if he did un-"inoffensive" stuff like take a dump on your front lawn and play deafeningly loud death metal at 3am?

  3. Americans Look Inward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Americans admire Barack Obama, George Bush, and Bill Clinton more than Nelson Mandela. That is a sad commentary on America. Neither of the former faced true adversity like Nelson Mandela.

    1. Re:Americans Look Inward by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2

      >Neither of the former faced true adversity like Nelson Mandela.
      Yep, none of them were married to Winnie Madela

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Americans Look Inward by fnj · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. Each of the three presidents mentioned has faced his own stream of vitriolic hate from his detractors. On the other hand, I doubt even Mandela's jailers hated him. They were afraid of him.

    3. Re:Americans Look Inward by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Americans admire Barack Obama, George Bush, and Bill Clinton more than Nelson Mandela. That is a sad commentary on America. Neither of the former faced true adversity like Nelson Mandela.

      You don't consider being married to Hillary Clinton "true adversity"?

  4. eww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the fact that Glenn Beck and Billy Graham are even on this list makes me want to vomit.

    1. Re:eww by CraftyJack · · Score: 2
      Seriously. Gates is the only one on the list that isn't a political or religious figure. The drop off in percentages is striking as well. Here's the list:

      1. Barack Obama (22%)

      2. George W. Bush (5%)

      3. Bill Clinton (4%)

      4. Nelson Mandela (2%)

      5. Bill Gates (2%)

      6. (tie) Pope Benedict XVI (2%)

      6. (tie) Rev. Billy Graham (2%)

      8. (tie) Jimmy Carter (2%)

      8. (tie) Glenn Beck (2%)

      10. The Dalai Lama (1%)

      Personally, I think those ties are hilarious.

    2. Re:eww by operagost · · Score: 0

      Opinions. Everyone has them. Can you point out anything those guys did that was worse than the shenanigans Bill Clinton participated in while in the most powerful office in the world? I could easily point out the absurdity of Jimmy Carter being on the list, but I realize that the great good of Habitat for Humanity tempers his incompetence as a leader and belligerent opposition to the state of Israel.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:eww by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      Seriously. Gates is the only one on the list that isn't a political or religious figure. The drop off in percentages is striking as well. Here's the list:

      I've got news for you, but Glen Beck is not a political figure. He holds no public office. Nobody's voted for him. He is a talk show host. And he's not nearly as popular as he seems to think he is. I'm a crazy right wing nut job and I can't stand him.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    4. Re:eww by iosq · · Score: 1

      Glenn Beck might have done better too, had his supporters known how to turn on a computer.

    5. Re:eww by khallow · · Score: 2

      I've got news for you, but Glen Beck is not a political figure.

      You don't have hold a political office in order to be a political figure. And you can be other things too, like a talk show host and still be a political figure. I'd give as an example of his qualification as a political figure, his rally in Washington, DC.

    6. Re:eww by godrik · · Score: 1

      well, I actually needed to google glenn beck to know who he is. I don't think this guy is much known outside the USA...

    7. Re:eww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an atheist, I don't have a lot of common ground with Billy Graham, but what exactly has he done that's demonstrably wrong? He may be the only televangelist to have run an honest church, and AFAIK he appeared to follow the principles he espoused. Certainly he's no Benny Hinn or Jim Bakker.

      - T

    8. Re:eww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count your blessings on that one. Some of us have to deal with his insufferable rants and followers on a frequent basis.

    9. Re:eww by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      There's only one true politician on that list - Jimmy Carter! 7,5 religious nut heads, and 1 business man. I feel for you US!
      (If you wonder, Obama is the 50/50 politician/religious nut head)

      --
      This is blinging
    10. Re:eww by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's a phrase that comes to mind: "Only in America"

  5. Money and smarts. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Money buys admiration, I suppose. Gates is also perceived as being very smart; and, to be fair, he is a very smart man. You try building an empire as huge and powerful as Microsoft was at its height of power and influence based only on technological and business accumen. It's not so easy.

  6. One more proof by Noughmad · · Score: 2

    that America's true religion is money.

    --
    PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    1. Re:One more proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and/or charity.

    2. Re:One more proof by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Maybe rich Americans give to charity in an attempt to buy their souls back.

      Anyway... I remember in the 90s that it was commonly known in the tech communities that Bill Gates gave less to charity (by percentage) than a welfare mom. Because it was so well known I always thought that the Gates foundation was partially for P.R. That doesn't lessen the good they have done and I think has been more and more about really helping people as Gates has gotten older.

    3. Re:One more proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Gates foundation is all about altruism.

    4. Re:One more proof by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Actually, many rich people so despise taxes they'd give away more money to charity than they would have to pay taxes, just out of spite.

    5. Re:One more proof by operagost · · Score: 0

      Maybe rich Americans give to charity in an attempt to buy their souls back.

      You don't automatically become evil and have to make penance, Roman Catholic-indulgence style, when you become rich. Being rich means that instead of spending time worrying about how you're going to pay your bills, you can think about all the wrong in the world and try to help. The problem is that people are as cynical as you are about philanthropists, yet they think it's the height of "charity" when a government taxes its citizens and then sends the money to whatever regimes it sees fit to support.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:One more proof by operagost · · Score: 1

      You don't automatically become evil and have to make penance, Roman Catholic-indulgence style, when you become rich. Being rich means that instead of spending time worrying about how you're going to pay your bills, you can think about all the wrong in the world and try to help. The problem is that people are as cynical as you are about philanthropists, yet they think it's the height of "charity" when a government taxes its citizens and then sends the money to whatever regimes it sees fit to support.

      Can anyone explain to me what is up with the moderators? Rebut anything I've said if you think it's incorrect-- don't just mod me down because you don't like it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:One more proof by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      You don't automatically become evil and have to make penance, Roman Catholic-indulgence style, when you become rich.

      No; although, if you're rocking the Christian set of ethics, Jesus had something to say about rich men getting into heaven, which essentially is: they're not going to.

    8. Re:One more proof by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Congratulations. You just won today's Glenn Beck Memorial Word Twisting award, presented to those people with the special talent of turning every comment in a Left vs. Right slamfest. Please get your prize, a full lobotomy, in room 3G.

    9. Re:One more proof by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's why Gates and Buffet want more taxes. Oh, wait...

    10. Re:One more proof by operagost · · Score: 1

      Did Jesus tell the man he was screwed because he had too much stuff? Or did he tell him to give it all away? Please look up John Huntsman and see what he plans to do with his wealth.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:One more proof by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure who you're talking to. Certainly, nothing you've said addresses anything in my post.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:One more proof by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Huh? "Oh wait" implies that Gates and Buffet don't actually want more taxes, which supports my point.

      Besides, Gates and Buffet would be outliers to my "many" qualifier, if they indeed like taxes. Some people (myself included) actually do like taxes (i'm just not wealthy, but if I were, my stance would be no different...but then again, if I had a different stance, I might be wealthy..hmmm)

    13. Re:One more proof by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Actually, he told the man he was screwed because he even set his heart on getting too much stuff.

      So it's worse than either of your choices.

    14. Re:One more proof by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      All your post did was accuse me of being a liburul based on one opinion. My opinion had nothing to do with left vs. right and it's just typical knee jerk garbage... I

  7. Re:It's a given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or a Nazi

  8. One got an empire built on deceit, lies and abuse by inu_maru · · Score: 1

    The other one sold DOS and Windows.

    --
    Mu
  9. Doing it wrong by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    That depends. You also have to include all of the Star Wars fans who sympathize with the Empire when you count the pope's supporters, since everyone knows he's the preincarnation of Emperor Palpatine.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Doing it wrong by Harassed · · Score: 1

      Surely that's a _re_incarnation. After all, it was "Long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away"...

    2. Re:Doing it wrong by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      I see that you prefer your time as a linear continuum. Well that's ok I guess. Whatever works for your particular set of dimensions.

      PS: You're right - my bad.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Doing it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be reincarnation. As we all know Star Wars happened "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away"

  10. News? by somersault · · Score: 1

    What is there to admire about the Pope?

    Then again, there's not too much to admire about Bill Gates if you consider that the damage he's done with Windows may outstrip the philanthropic work he's done. I wonder how many homework assignments/theses etc have been lost to BSODs, and how much money people have lost to malware and zombie-assisted spam scams, etc.

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:News? by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many homework assignments/theses etc have been lost to BSODs, and how much money people have lost to malware and zombie-assisted spam scams, etc.

      The counterargument to this is whether Gates has benefited from these incidents. OSX/Linux/BSD don't magically save term papers in multiple places automatically, either. People that actually fall for those Prince of Nigeria scams wouldn't be safe if they used a computer completely free of any Microsoft code. How does it benefit Gates to release a product that BSODs during a demo (the infamous video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW7Rqwwth84)?

      I'm not saying that Microsoft has no responsibility whatsoever (they've really only tightened up ship within the past couple years after 20 years of 'whatevs'), but if someone ignores all warnings presented when promised to see the dancing bunnies, is it Windows' fault that they've been tricked into running a trojan? Should it be an unconditional deny so that users are made completely incapable of such things? If so, then why is the general slashdot groupthink angry at Apple for doing these things on iOS? You can't have it both ways.

    2. Re:News? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Whether Gates has benefited from them does not matter, the point is if he has caused them. OSX/Linux/BSD don't magically backup papers no, but they got their shit together in terms of using more stable driver architectures faster than Windows did.

      My point was about spam sent by zombie machines, which basically will be 100% Windows machines. Yes people would still fall for scams, but the volume of spam would be much lower without the zombies. I remember stats from maybe 3 years ago saying that 50% of all web traffic was spam. That's a crazy waste of resources.

      They are getting better yes, but it's annoying that it's only 12 years after I had to give up on other options and start using Windows. And I switched to Mac OS then Ubuntu a couple of years ago anyway. Thankfully things like Firefox helped to turn the web into a much more standards oriented place and made it possible to switch platform without too much hassle.

      I'm quite aware of the problems with Slashdot groupthink, and stupid users, but I also feel that companies like Microsoft and Intel with their proven criminal anti-competitive practices have held back the world of computing for perhaps 5-10 years. In terms of the tech world, that's a lot of time. Things are looking bright for the future at least, with Linux and ARM on the rise, we're finally seeing some real competition :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:News? by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      Then again, there's not too much to admire about Bill Gates if you consider that the damage he's done with Windows may outstrip the philanthropic work he's done. I wonder how many homework assignments/theses etc have been lost to BSODs, and how much money people have lost to malware and zombie-assisted spam scams, etc.

      Most normal people would probably have written their homework assignments and thesis on typewriters if it wasn't for Bill Gates. Dislike him and his product all you want, but computers would not be a mainstream household appliance today if it wasn't for Microsoft Windows.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    4. Re:News? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Dislike him and his product all you want, but computers would not be a mainstream household appliance today if it wasn't for Microsoft Windows.

      Bullshit. I was writing and printing my homework assignments from a Mac before Windows 3.1 even came out (I was 8 at the time). Later on I also bought a cheap printer for my Amiga which I could have used to print assignments, though I'm not sure if I ever used it for that.

      Macs were expensive though, and Amigas were seen as gaming machines, so maybe you reject that.

      Okay, so we need something that runs on cheap yet professionally respectable hardware. What about stuff like BeOS, BSD, Linux, and whatever other OSes were released around the same time as Windows 3.1? If Windows hadn't been released, one of them would have done the job better. The market is very slowly correcting itself, but ffs I wish it would get there before I'm too old to even care.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:News? by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I was writing and printing my homework assignments from a Mac before Windows 3.1 even came out (I was 8 at the time). Later on I also bought a cheap printer for my Amiga ...

      Geeks like us would have written papers using punched cards if that what it took. Normal average people would not be using computers for every day tasks without Windows.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    6. Re:News? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that? Was Windows more user friendly than the other options available at the time? No. People would have ended up using computers anyway, it just so happens that Windows was either better marketed, or lucky.

      I'm not really aware of all the historical ins and outs of the OS wars seeing as I was only 9 at the time, but all I know is that back then, I thought Windows 3.1 was an ugly and unusable piece of shit compared to my Macs and Amigas. Not because I couldn't figure it out, I just thought the windowing manager was awkward and ugly. And waddya know? With Windows 95 the windowing manager design finally caught up with the Macs and Amigas from the mid 1980s, but was still behind the Macs and Amigas of the day in terms of user friendliness and speed, despite running on more powerful hardware. I can't speak for other OSes at the time as I didn't have any direct experience with them. It still makes me sick to think how much MS have held things back with their fugly inefficient software, though I try to just ignore it these days and make the best of what we have.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:News? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Of course they would! Everyone was marketing the home computer for all sorts of everyday tasks since the 1980's. If Microsoft didn't nab the home computer market someone else would have done. It's an obvious application.

      Steve Wozniak and Clive Sinclair did a lot more to get computers into the home.

    8. Re:News? by JonJ · · Score: 1

      but I also feel that companies like Microsoft and Intel with their proven criminal anti-competitive practices have held back the world of computing for perhaps 5-10 years. In terms of the tech world, that's a lot of time.

      Thank you! Every time I point this out, I get modded flamebait or troll. Bill Gates is a criminal who has actually brought the industry to a standstill with his illegal practices.

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
  11. A list of shady people by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Most of them on the list are political and religious personalities. I wouldn't put any of them as admirable, they are all just very personable people who wants everyone else to think they way they do. Actually with that List Bill Gates is probably the most admirable one there. He is actually trying to make a difference where everyone else just talks about it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:A list of shady people by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Gates is the only one trying to make a difference?

      Nelson Mandela has plenty of faults, but "not actually trying to make a difference" is not one of them. He helped lead an armed rebellion, then led a political revolution after his release from prison. You don't have to like the guy or agree with his politics (or even his goals) to admire what he's done, or at least respect his tenacity.

      Also, Jimmy Carter, agree with him politically or not, has a pretty good track record of putting his time and energy where his mouth is.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:A list of shady people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about ideas does help them spread, so if you admire the notion, you can admire its mouthpiece. I may be an atheist, but I still have great respect and admiration for the Dalai Lama - and no, he doesn't want everyone to think just like he does.

  12. Why would anybody admire The Pope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title.

  13. protestants dont admire the pope?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i thought the US was mostly protestant. if so, its obvious they wouldnt admire the pope... or the dalai lama. only trendy and spiritual hipsters would be surprised by or care about these results

    1. Re:protestants dont admire the pope?! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Historically this has been true, but times they are a changing. Namely the vast majority of people coming in from Mexico and South America, which represent the fastest growing demographic in the US, are predominately catholic. About 1/3 of the country is now catholic and that number is expected to grow.....(unfortunately IMO, ex-catholic ex-everything now :P)

    2. Re:protestants dont admire the pope?! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      There are some truly hardcore protestants who are dead serious about the Pope being a 6-armed antichrist-whore-of-babylon; enough to say so in public(and a fair slice of the evangelical protestant leadership will confirm, if not shout from the rooftops, that Catholicism is a false faith); but day-to-day, the cynical(but effective) narrative of "Our Judeo-Christian heritage" actually holds a lot of sway.

      Pragmatically speaking, the less conservative a protestant or catholic is, the less likely they are to worry about their doctrinal differences and just have a vague respect for religious authority figures of most stripes. The more conservative they are, the more likely it is that they hate the guts of one another's theology; but the more likely it is that they, pragmatically, recognize that they share a common cause in ending abortion, putting women and homos in their place, fighting liberalism and secularism, and so forth. In practice, this means that they are generally willing to bury the hatchet on things like "transubstantiation or consubstantiation" until they've finished with abolishing modernity. Heck, in their observer capacity at the UN, the Vatican was even willing to overlook Muslim polygamy(for which spousal benefits are available, for UN employees), and lobby with the OIC against the same benefits being extended to homosexual dyadic relationships...)

      Thus, I would expect that the Pope, by virtue of the cool hat and invisible friend, would enjoy some respect from all but fire-breathing uber-protestants and smirking atheists. The only thing that has bumped him down the rankings this time is that whole "decades of covering up the repeated rape of countless children" thing.

    3. Re:protestants dont admire the pope?! by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

      Within the protestant church (yes, I regularly attend one), this has been dubbed the 'health and wealth gospel', and even with the ranks it's controversial at best and similarly detested at worst, for the reasons you describe. After all, if Jesus is the Son of God and the metric of how well one does God's will is directly related to one's earthly wealth, than Jesus sucked at it royally.

  14. Re:ADMIRED??? by chemicaldave · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm assuming most people voted for him because of his philanthropy.

  15. Glenn Beck, the Pope? by CosaNostra+Pizza+Inc · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What can possibly be admired by the Pope, or Glenn Beck and his straw-man arguments

  16. Re:ADMIRED??? by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The man gave billions of his personal fortune to help make real change possible. Tangible things that save lives. The Pope may have done some great things too--but his biggest accomplishment is being politically successful in the church. That may require a higher level of personal generosity than does Bill Gates' decision to give billions away once he had them. But the church would have done good with a different pope. And most billionaires don't give so much of their fortune away.

    Part of it may also be the institutional problem--people think of leaders as the individual doing something great more than of the individual making slight political changes to a major established institution.

    A lot of it will also be the money. A lot of Americans have problems in their life that money can solve. Spiritual guidance may help them be content with their lot in life, and make them happier--but it doesn't solve the fact that you're out of work while your spouse has cancer and needs the insurance, or that your son or daughter needs money for college, or for legal bills about one really stupid thing they did. Money makes these things easier. It doesn't always make them easy, but it makes them easier.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
  17. He only donated enormous amounts of money... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, why should anyone admire a man who donated enormous amounts of money to charity?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by vlm · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yeah, why should anyone admire a man who donated enormous amounts of money to charity?

      Because of the shady way he got it? Monopolistic business practices to sell a remarkably shoddy set of products?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lots of drug lords donate enormous amounts of money to their cities neighborhoods. Go look in Columbia. It is one of the reasons they are adored in their own hometowns. Doesn't change the fact that they are drug lords and will kill people to make a profit.

      So, perhaps we should look at the TOTALITY of Bill Gates career, rather than just what he did with the money after he got more than he could ever spend.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Outside of slashdot not many people care that they're using Internet Explorer instead of Netscape. They just want it to be cheap, to be sure it connects to Facebook.

      And has a working Flash player...

      --
      No sig today...
    4. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lots of drug lords donate enormous amounts of money to their cities neighborhoods. Go look in Columbia. It is one of the reasons they are adored in their own hometowns. Doesn't change the fact that they are drug lords and will kill people to make a profit.

      So, perhaps we should look at the TOTALITY of Bill Gates career, rather than just what he did with the money after he got more than he could ever spend.


      Yeah, then everyone can see just how stupid it is to compare him with a drug lord.

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    5. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Doesn't change the fact that they are admired in their hometowns.

    6. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Coeurderoy · · Score: 1

      He is donating enormous amounts to "his" charity, wich means that he pays even less taxes.
      And all this means is that he has to use "charitably" 5% of the money put aside every year, the rest he can use to "invest" anyway he wants.

      What most people do not realise is that over a certain amount money is just power... and fondations are ideal tools of power mongering.

      Put another way he does no charitable work whatsoever, but has successfully outsourced part of the marketing, brand management and "CSR" of his cash cow to a tax haven.

      And looking at recent bio related patents microsoft received it seems that the "feel good" investments in malaria research is not only third world country marketing (to make sure that they do not have the stupid idea of using free software for their government or even worse develop a real local IT industry (trading is ok, you need somebody to whitewash the gratfs)), but also a diversification scheme.

      well it could be that americans "admire" people who robs them of lots of money, or that using phone survey for this kind of thing does not work...

      I guess that if somebody would call me right now and ask "who are the three people you admire the most", (well I would just hang up, but) I would really tell the the name of three people recently in the news without being named guilty of some horrendous crime...

    7. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by haystor · · Score: 1

      Netscape also lost because it sucked. As of IE 3.02, it was superior to Netscape. After that the differences just got bigger. The idea of paying for browsers and even http servers was just not going to stick around for long, in any case.

      --
      t
    8. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Yup, the poster was confusing an explanation of popularity for a justification there of.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    9. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're trivializing what the cartels have done to those countries and the people who live within them by comparing Microsoft's relatively benign practices to the murders, rapes, enslavement and atrocities committed by the cartels.

      Yes, Microsoft lead by Gates (and he was not the ONLY player there) has done some bad stuff. So had Oracle, so has Apple, so has *insert name of ANY corporation* - it's part of the whole corporate concept. Corporations are, by design, essentially sociopathic entities bent on profit at all costs.

      But the fact of the matter is, there are lots of extremely wealthy people out there - people who, in many cases have made their fortunes in FAR more "evil" fashions than Gates, who have been responsible for killing hundreds or thousands of people and poisoned huge swaths of the Earth - who do exactly fuckall for anyone but themselves.

      Looking at the ENTIRETY of Gates' career and comparing it to most other people - yes, Gates has done some rather admirable things and a few things that, since you decided to start comparing him and his organization to other groups - barely even rate on the scale of evil that corporations perpetrate every single day.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    10. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Outside of slashdot not many people care that they're using Internet Explorer instead of Netscape.

      They do once they have to call the local Linux geek because their Windows box is "running slow".

      They never bother to understand the technical details but they are bothered by them just the same.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Desler · · Score: 0

      Netscape also lost because it sucked.

      But that's not possible!!!! Netscape only failed because Microsoft was a big, bad, mean bully!! It had nothing to do with the fact that Netscape was buggy and the company was shooting itself doing a huge rewrite of the browser while IE was improving and steadily releasing new versions!!! How dare you bring up the real history instead of the Slashtard romanticized version!!!!!

    12. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by puto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bill Gates and Pablo Escobar are a pretty poor comparison. Gates never put bounties on the heads of policeman as far as I can recall. And running a software company is not the same as slinging dope. Your comparison is just absurd. Pablo was adored by the poor of Medellin because he actually did something for community that the government would not. His legacy lived on because he was actually behind Alvaro Uribe(funded the majority of public works in Medellin that the former president got credit for and which later enabled him to become president). He also offered to quit the business and pay the national debt of the country for amnesty. He was a murderer but he did care about his home town. However, I do not recall much adoration for him throughout the country during his reign, except in the super poor barrios of Medallo. And I was living here during those dark days. Our civil was with Farc and other paramilitary groups has always been facilitated by the United Fruit Company(Chiquita) to keep Colombians down on the farm. All for fucking bananas. The Cali cartel(Guiterrez brothers) took over and were much more ruthless, and that is why Cali today is one of the most dangerous cities in Latin America. Medellin, on the other hand has become absolutely amazing. Textile factories, tourism, an average temp around 70 year around, not to mention prettier girls than most places in the world. No one here really admires any drug lord. However, when you are living hard scrabble poverty, and your only way out to a decent life is to get into the business, You do what you have to do.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    13. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by puto · · Score: 1

      Please tell me how long and where you have lived in Colombia. 99.9% of the people here loathe the drug business. All of those people in the states you see wearing Pablo shirts, are usually Puerto Rican, Mexican, or Cuban.

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    14. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why should anyone admire a man who donated enormous amounts of money to charity?

      Because of the shady way he got it?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    15. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Yeah, then everyone can see just how stupid it is to compare him with a drug lord.

      Right, because as everybody knows, Bill Gates never thinks like that.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    16. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by sorak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why should anyone admire a man who donated enormous amounts of money to charity?

      I'm not going to say that Gates is evil, but I would say that someone who is struggling to pay their bills, but donates just a little bit to the food bank every Christmas should be more admired than somebody who has $67 billion and gives half of it away.

      Not every billionaire does that, and I think I am starting to change my mind about him for the reason you mention, but the donation should honestly been seen as a percent of total accumulated wealth.

    17. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Mike+Mentalist · · Score: 1

      Right, because as everybody knows, Bill Gates never thinks like that.

      No, Bill Gates doesn't think like drug lords do.

      --
      I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
    18. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      To most people "slow computer" is just one more thing to complain about around the water cooler.

      --
      No sig today...
    19. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Again, half the crowd on /. likes to intentionally misunderstand in order to karma whore.

      To those that really misunderstand: It is a worst case comparison. If you can see why someone as offensive as a drug lord can be adored, then it explains why someone less offensive (yet offensive) like Bill Gates can be adored. You still look at the damage he has done over the years to smaller businesses, which is not trivial.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    20. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      I don't care. I'm taking the statements made by the post I was replying to at face value.

    21. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      And running a software company is not the same as slinging dope.

      True. You have to pay for your first hit of Windows.

    22. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I dunno...didn't Bill Gates say something along the lines of..."sure, let them steal/pirate/copy the software...they'll get addicted (like drugs)"

    23. Re:He only donated enormous amounts of money... by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Boo hoo. More competitive business squashes less competitive smaller business. News at 11. Apple is now doing the same thing and good for them. Marsellus Wallace got it wrong. It isn't pride that's fucking with you, it's cognitive dissonance.

  18. Re:It's a given by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Flamebait? It has been proven that the current pope personally acted to relocate molesters and hide the evidence of their misdeeds. If not a child molester himself, he is directly responsible for child molestation.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. Re:ADMIRED??? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 0

    Given that ol' Bill has both the philanthropic bleedinghearts and the sociopathic profit Uber Alles demographic absolutely sewn up, I'm surprised he didn't rank higher...

    Once you take those two slices out of the American population, what've you got left, the 30-odd% of total Jesus freaks?

  20. Murder vs Prosperity by Dark_Matter88 · · Score: 1

    I am not a windows user, and I despise alot of microsoft products, but what they did for society is amazing, its all due to bill starting it. Now he carries on his good work with an immensely good charity. The pope wants to hold back progress and finds poverty and disease being spread as nothing less than a holy must. This is a good sign of clear thinking.

  21. Yes admired. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes it is true. He's has been at the #1 or #2 for Richest Americans in Forbes magazine.

    Most people think of him as just a hard driving businessman who got fabulously wealthy due to hard work and brains - most don't know about the million dollar trust fund.

    And then, he takes his billions and starts a charity and gets other billionaires to give up billions more.

    He's also quite admired around the World too. All of my foreign classmates in B school admired him. Bring up monopoly or some of the other criticisms against him that are mentioned here and you'd get a blank stare like you wanted to wear a crash helmet to play Cricket or a counter argument that boils down to of 'he was a tough businessman and all the criticisms are from people who have the case of sour grapes' - which is an argument I can sympathize with (just listen to Metcalfe whine like a little bitch how MS screwed him - while he walked away with over $100 million.[Revenge of the Geeks, IIRC])

    And no, the general public doesn't feel screwed over by 90% market share of Windows.

  22. I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also Nolan Bushnell. Most people have never heard of these guys, due to MS and Apple becoming dominant and rewriting history, but these guys were the True pioneers. Nolan Bushnell created the first successful videogames company. Atari was dominant from circa 1972 to 1984.

    Commodore's Jack Tramiel had a "business is war" philosophy that put 30 million ~$200 computers in people's homes, and forced the competitors to drop their prices too (from the previous ~$3000 standard).

    And Jay Miner practically invented the multimedia computer. First with the 128 color Atari video chip, then the more-advanced 128 color ANTIC used in the 400/800 computers, and eventually the 4000+ color GPU inside the Amiga. He also pioneered music-quality sound with his Paula device, and multitaking for home computers. It took the Mac/PC world ten years to catch-up.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      He also pioneered music-quality sound with his Paula device

      No he didn't.

      He copied, cheaply, from the synthesizer industry.. where more than a few companies were using sample-based synths.

      Commodore should have stuck with the designer of the SID chip, because that guy is the one who revolutionized computer audio when he went to Ensoniq.

      That 4-channel Amiga chip wasnt even the best in computers at the time, which happened to be in the AppleIIgs which sported a 16-channel Ensoniq DOC2 chip... and each channel was panable too. Fast foward a few years and the PC received the Ensoniq DOC3 chip, licensed by Gravis UltraSound (and dubbed the GF1), capable of 32 panable channels.

      You've got the wrong guy. Jay Miner didnt have squat to do with the revolution other than designing a gimped knock off of what the music industry was already using.

      Bob Yannes was the Commodore guy that revolutionized the computer audio industry, and he already produced something significantly better than Paula by the time the Amiga was even in draft.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      I see that when someone correct you, you jump to conclusions and go on the attack in order to deflect from your error.

      FACT: Jay Miner did not, as you had claimed, pioneer music quality sound with Paula.

      Just suck it up and live with your error, rude fan boy.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say is true, as Jay miner didn't design the Paula sound chip. (I forget the name of the guy who did the actual design. At any rate, it was one of those Amiga fellows...) However, for its time in 1985, it *was* the best on the market. Apple ][ GS wasn't released until the following year. Although it's interesting to note the ][ GS sound chip was partially designed by the guy who did the SID chip.

    4. Re:I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You admire Jay Miner, Jack Tramiel and Nolan Bushnell but no mention for Chuck Peddle who clearly had the biggest impact in driving forward affordable computing? What kind of Commodore fan are you! ; )

    5. Re:I admire Jay Miner and Jack Tramiel more by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Bob Yannes also deserves credit for SID, yes, but Jay Miner created those high-color chips in 1977 and 1985 when PCs were still doing just 2 or 16 colors. He had enough vision to realize more colors would be better. And of course he created the overall beauty that was the Amiga (68000 + independent processors == preemptive multiprocessing).

      To say "Jay Miner didnt have squat" is piss poor on your part. You are insulting a man who doesn't deserve to be insulted. I wouldn't be surprised if you did the same to your fellow coworkers: "Of Joe isn't that great an engineer. He doesn't do squat."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  23. He is the lesser of two evils by smartin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some one had to say it.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  24. Re:Astroturfing is a religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did you really think all of those Astroturfers didn't have a God?

  25. Well, it's not that surprising by Moraelin · · Score: 0

    Well, it's not that hard to be more admired than the head of an organization that's gotten lots of attention for paedophilia and child abuse lately -- not to mention such revelations like they were running glorified slave camps even in the west and in the 20'th century, see the Magdalene asylums in Ireland -- not to mention the revelation that said head of the organization was personally involved in covering up the paedophilia incidents. Add such stuff as his telling places in Africa that have an AIDS pandemic to not use condoms, and the like. And really, I'm surprised that the Pope has any respect at all.

    I think even for most devout Catholics he's more like the guy who unfortunately happens to be at the head of their church for the moment, than a shining example of sainthood.

    So, really, being more admired than the Pope is a bit like being more admired than Kim Jong Il ("president" of N. Korea.) Even if technically true, it doesn't really say much.

    Add the fact that Bill Gates does get some genuine admiration from a lot of people, ranging from those who only heard that he "made" Windows and Word and of his charity stunts, to apologists of ruthless unregulated capitalism for whom breaking the rules and making a monopoly actually kinda makes one a hero. Which again, is actually more than the current Pope has to show as a claim to fame or infamy.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  26. Even Glenn Beck?? by martas · · Score: 1, Funny

    I get the Pope and Dalai Lama part, but more admired than Beck?? That's just wrong!

    1. Re:Even Glenn Beck?? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Maybe some thought that the poll was referring to Beck, purveyor of vaguely folkish alterna-rock?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    2. Re:Even Glenn Beck?? by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      That's an insult to the guy who made slacker rock a household genre!

      Arena rock. Good lord. Pfff. Get off my lawn.

      But the original poster of the question is right. WTF, F? Glenn Beck? That guy has got to be the biggest, most bigoted douchebag I've seen on TV in the States.

  27. Hardly an in depth poll.. by JunkmanUK · · Score: 1

    They asked just over a 1000 people through a telephone survey... hardly an in depth poll.

    Most people probably responded with the only names they could think of at the time. I'd like to think most Americans are more educated and would put more thought into their vote given the opportunity.

  28. Re:ADMIRED??? by grub · · Score: 4, Informative


    Philanthropy and the fact that Gates didn't run an organization which hid and shuffled its pedophiles around the world.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  29. Re:ADMIRED??? by LastGunslinger · · Score: 1

    Who do you suggest we admire, then? Bill Gates is the epitome of a person who has achieved the American dream. He has made himself the one wealthiest people on Earth through (mostly) honest means. By helping to make the PC ubiquitous in the household and office, he has had great influence on American and world business, technology, and culture. And now that he has stepped down as leader of Microsoft, he is spending his time donating his wealth to worthy causes. He's not a saint, and has certainly engaged in questionable business practices, but there are certainly worse people to admire. It is so bad to admire someone who made good by using his intelligence rather than athletic ability, appearance, family name, religion, etc?

  30. Re:One got an empire built on deceit, lies and abu by amiga3D · · Score: 1

    And yet they have so much in common.

  31. Easy by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates has a history of rather predatory business practices, but at least he donates lots of money to charities and manage one of the biggest charities. Has he outright ruined anyone's life? I highly doubt it.

    The pope is a cunt, a backwards, über-conservative dickhead who would rather ignore the problems facing his millions of subjects than take any real action. Problems like pedophilia, AIDS and crippling poverty and hunger.

    --
    Eat the rich.
    1. Re:Easy by slim · · Score: 1

      The pope is a cunt, a backwards, über-conservative dickhead who would rather ignore the problems facing his millions of subjects than take any real action. Problems like pedophilia, AIDS and crippling poverty and hunger.

      Ignore? You mean aggravate, right?

    2. Re:Easy by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Gates is well-known for the predatory business practices by those of us in IT - but what about those who aren't?

      I wonder if he's just seen as someone who started from relatively modest beginnings and has since built a huge company and an enormous fortune. Seen like that, he would appear to be a perfectly reasonable person to both respect and admire.

    3. Re:Easy by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      You are correct, of course.

      I tell you, even it is a different pope, the fist-fight against the pope in the Sistine Chapel at the end of Assassin's Creed II felt glorious.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  32. Margin of Error? by celticryan · · Score: 5, Informative

    What a horrible poll.

    The sample size quoted was 1019. At 95% confidence level, the simple statistical error is about 3%. That puts basically everyone from 2-9 at the same amount of admiration...

    1. Re:Margin of Error? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Glad I'm not the only statistician in here.

      Essentially, what this survey really says is that most Americans at least know their current president and remember the last one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Margin of Error? by flynt · · Score: 1

      Well, I am a statistician, too.

      I hesitate to say too much about a poll where I am not privy to its final aims, but it seems quite plausible that the point of this poll was to decide who Americans admire the *most*. It looks like they got a pretty clear answer to that question. It would be very hard (i.e., require so many respondents) to design a poll powered to differentiate between each possible candidate at some alpha level.

      So, I don't share your criticism of this poll as much as the summary in this article.

    3. Re:Margin of Error? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I noticed. There should be some rule that states a minimum percentage of samples before statistical data can be published. A mere 0.001% of Americans would have been a sample of 30,800 rather than 1019 - over 30x as accurate?

      And how hard is it to collect polling data these days. The most recent poll on Slashdot, posted yesterday, already has over 7900 votes. The prior poll from five days ago has over 27600 and ten days ago is up to 41300.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    4. Re:Margin of Error? by mangu · · Score: 2

      what this survey really says is that most Americans at least know their current president and remember the last one.

      No, it says that 22% of Americans know their current president, 5% think the last one is still in the White House, and 4% think the next to the last president is still there.

    5. Re:Margin of Error? by celticryan · · Score: 1

      You are exactly right. I suppose I was a little over reaching in my statement about the poll itself. The atrociousness of the summary should be no surprise... But, to be clear, I am not a statistician in the formal sense.

    6. Re:Margin of Error? by denobug · · Score: 1

      Why is this post not rated at 5+ is a mystery to me.

    7. Re:Margin of Error? by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      A mere 0.001% of Americans would have been a sample of 30,800 rather than 1019 - over 30x as accurate?

      That's not how it works. The standard error of the mean (which may or may not be applicable depending on your poll, but at least is illustrative) scales as 1/Sqrt(n) where n is the sample size. Multiplying your sample size by 30 multiplies your error by 1/Sqrt(30) ~= 0.18, giving you around ~5x the accuracy (i.e. 1/5th the error margin), not 30x. Also, you'll notice that formula doesn't involve the size of the true population. Scaling the population of the US by 1000 doesn't affect the error margin of a sample, relying on the standard error of the mean. Suggesting we require a certain percentage of the population be used in polls is therefore a novice mistake and glosses over the more complex statistical issues involved.

      The most recent poll on Slashdot, posted yesterday, already has over 7900 votes. The prior poll from five days ago has over 27600 and ten days ago is up to 41300.

      Slashdot's polls are well and truly not representative of Americans. Off the top of my head, they'd have heavy liberal, pro-science, anti-religion biases compared to the full population. (This is not necessarily a good or bad thing, it's just a thing.) Slashdot polls also self-select--you only answer the question if it interests you. Getting a representative sample of Americans is non-trivial and many polls stop at about ~1000 since they're happy with the error margin at that point (around 3% for most polls I've seen; this varies with the polling methods and confidence level). These are often conducted by phone, and calling enough people to get 1000 responses is a big job.

      That said, ordering TFA's list is probably terrible statistics. Subsample sizes that round to 2% are only 16-25 people. To be fair, TFA does list several "ties" but it's unclear if those are true ties (i.e. 20 people each picked Jimmy Carter and Glenn Beck) or if they're statistical ties (i.e. the error margins allow the order of the two to be unclear at a particular confidence level). The article goes on to speculate on causes of Gates' rise in the list, which is just silly. Perhaps the cause is that people who preferred several of the people who beat Gates last year now generally prefer Obama. In this case none of Gates' actions contribute to his ranking.

      I hate it when journalists report statistics. It's so often just terrible. They very often ignore error margins entirely and draw strong conclusions from weak data, out of ignorance. Journalists aren't statisticians (neither am I) but they could at least stick to reporting the facts.

    8. Re:Margin of Error? by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      That was the first thing I noticed. There should be some rule that states a minimum percentage of samples before statistical data can be published. A mere 0.001% of Americans would have been a sample of 30,800 rather than 1019 - over 30x as accurate?

      And how hard is it to collect polling data these days. The most recent poll on Slashdot, posted yesterday, already has over 7900 votes. The prior poll from five days ago has over 27600 and ten days ago is up to 41300.

      Please tell me you were joking. Please?

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  33. Re:It's a given by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2

    It's okay. Moderation is just a number.

    Someone felt that my post that is critical of the pope was designed to draw flames. Should I hold my tongue because I fear the censorship of small minded people with power?

  34. Great Choices by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

    If you ask whether I'd rather have surprise diarrhea while having sex or while making a speech in front of a thousand people, I guess I'd still have to pick one.

  35. Really? by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates, Glenn Beck, the Pope, or the Dalai Lama? What were my other choices again? As a liberal atheist if that's all i've got to choose from i'd go with either Bill Gates or the Dalai Lama too, and i've been boycotting the XBox ever since the first model came out, despite being an avid gamer.

    I haven't read TFA, so i wouldn't be surprised if those weren't the only options, but from my perspective at least that's a pretty weird selection to choose for comparison.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Really? by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd have to take Gates from those four as well.

      Gates is monopolistic businessman, who has got out of that business now and is doing something worthwhile with the ill gotten gains.

      Beck is either insane or an entertainer playing with fire.

      The Pope and the Dalai Lama are both actively evil.

    2. Re:Really? by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 2

      The Dalai Lama is actively evil? Perhaps I am not up with recent news but I never heard that opinion before. Perhaps you could furnish us with some links (preferably not originating from the Chinese government)

    3. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Independence of Tibet is one thing. Trying to return it to the Dalai Lama dictatorship that it once was is not nice. He is a nice guy when he has no power (Just like George Bush, perhaps?), but it is still his aim to be the religious leader of a dictatorial theoracracy.

      The chinese angle to this is more on grounds of: Tibet is our, stop spreading lies about that it was once independent, but when they were they were totally mean to chinese people, but ofcourse that never happened, so stop spreading lies!

    4. Re:Really? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The Dalai Lama is actively evil? Perhaps I am not up with recent news but I never heard that opinion before.

      Historically the Lama's have had a few abuses. Most religious leaders have skeletons from previous leaders.

      The current one is quite good, he has no real political power which is odd for a religious leader so he's kind of like the Queen of England, he just makes nice speeches, drinks tea with all sorts and generally makes people feel good.

      So in purely Karmic terms, the Lama is better but in terms of actually changing things Bill is better to be admired. Personally I'd rather admire Tim Burners-lee or Steven Hawking but they weren't options. Like it or not, Bill did a lot in changing computers from massive, hyper expensive mainframe systems to a cheap, mass produced desktop system by uncoupling the OS from the hardware and delivering a one fingered salute to the Lords of Unix in their ivory towers a full decade before Linus finished the job. Bill was never dishonest about his monopolistic intentions, his dream was stated outright "a computer on every desk in the world, all running Microsoft Windows" or similar. I have many bad words to describe Mr Gates, but dishonest is not amongst them.

      Not to lessen the damage he's done since then mind you but lets be honest, Most of us on /. would be mechanics or carpenters who could barely afford a $8000 entry level SGI box if it weren't for Bill taking IBM by the horns in the 80's

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  36. What? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2

    What exactly did Windows do for our society? When last I checked, it was the Internet that really changed things, and the Internet was not built using Windows. The only reason people admire Bill Gates is his philanthropy, and to be honest, although I strongly disagree with a lot of Microsoft's tactics under Gates' leadership, I am glad to see that he is willing to give so much to charity.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, MS and later Windows helped to break the IBM monopoly in business computing back in the 80's and 90's, which dramatically reduced the administrative costs associated with running a business. By the late 90's, though, having become IBM 2.0, MS began to increase the costs relative to efficiency gains of their products, particularly in the area of externalities such as viruses and time lost due to buggy software. Almost all the accrued productivity gains were in the 1980-95 era, while the post-95 Internet era saw productivity gains almost exclusively outside of MS products (e-mail and Internet search being the big two). There have been some gains in the 00's due to networked file storage and applications (active directory and the like), but only for the largest of companies. Small and mid-sized companies are probably worse-off trying to use such cumbersome products. The ultimate legacy from MS and Bill Gates for most people is that computers are fragile, confusing and somewhat dangerous. He made using computers "work" and somewhat unpleasant work at that.

    2. Re:What? by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      Nobody likes a poor thief.

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason people admire Bill Gates is his philanthropy...

      Well, let's see. I like Windows (7), the ability to buy cheap hardware (pretty much because every Taiwanese manufacturer card is supported by Windows - even if they do write their own drivers). The company makes good money. And most of the people I interact with use the same OS, making life much easier. Sure we could all use Ubuntu, but given the sheer choice, it makes life a little more painful.

    4. Re:What? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Before the internet revolution came the personal computer revolution; both were important.

      Although I would argue that Windows stifled progress that could have been made if some other OS had won the IBM bidding.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  37. Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People are distrustful of religion in general, and the Pope in particular. Bill Gates comes with none of that baggage. Aside from a few of us /. geeks, Bill Gates' reputation as both a philanthropist and entrepreneur is pretty much spotless among the general public. And, among much of the American public, Companies like MS and Apple are also seen as some of the few bright spots in an economy that has seen American manufacturing going into the shitter for the last 40 years. It wouldn't surprise me if Steve Jobs beat the Pope too.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by alendit · · Score: 1

      I was constantly molested by Microsoft's products, when i was young...i can't trust an operating system any more.

    2. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by Karellen · · Score: 1

      People are distrustful of any religion which isn't theirs in general.

      FTFY.

      (And most USAians are not Catholics)

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    3. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by Creedo · · Score: 1

      People are distrustful of religion in general, and the Pope in particular.

      How I wish this were true. To correct it, you should say that people are distrustful of religions they are not a member of. Most people are quite comfortable with their inherited beliefs.

      --
      All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    4. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by khallow · · Score: 1

      And most USAians are not Catholics

      The beliefs of most US Christians don't treat Catholics differently. Sure there's a number of evangelicals that thinks the Pope is the Antichrist and Catholics are going to Hell, but they're a very small minority (plus that kind tends to think even closely related evangelicals are going to Hell too).

      And that brings us to Bill Gates. I gather he's not Christian. That puts him in a much smaller group than Catholics.

    5. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      That we know of...
      He might be good at covering up!

      Gates for pope!!!

      --
      This is blinging
    6. Re:Duh, Bill Gates never covered up for molesters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of your entry. How ever the philanthropist is a bit lets say strained. The top of my distrust is that he gives out Windows machines like they were a dime a dozen (in reality thats all they are worth) Although I do not know if they are close to current hardware standards or are they generation - X ?

  38. Re:One got an empire built on deceit, lies and abu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One built an empire on bedrock of fear, paranoia, and hatred.

    The other looks like Senator Palpatine.

  39. Re:ADMIRED??? by deemen · · Score: 1

    Another tip this poll is worthless. The top 3 answers are US Politicians... People admire politicians? News to me.

  40. No shit! by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone admire the pope? An idiot with a silly hat, that's all there is to him.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  41. a good thing by llung · · Score: 1

    And why not? Bill Gates has done a lot of good with this wealth; real tangible things. And it's not just about giving money, it's about being involved. He and his wife are both active in the process and that's what makes it impressive - they're not just signing checks. And why would anyone put Glenn Beck in the same sentence with the Pope, the Dalai Lama and Bill Gates? Except maybe for contrast with the Dark Side.

  42. Makes sense by Mouldy · · Score: 1

    Unlike the Pope, Bill Gates spends a lot of his riches on charity research. Wikipedia states that he's donated $28 billion of his own money to charitable causes (mainly the Bill & Melinda foundation). He has also agreed to give at least 50% of his fortune (currently valued at $54 billion) to charity.

    I'm not particularly down with the Vatican kids, so I ask you; What has the current Pope actually done? I doubt very much that he has the means to even equal Bill Gates' contributions.

  43. Obligatory Babylon 5 Quote by SteveHeadroom · · Score: 1

    "He's not the Pope. He doesn't look anything like her."

    1. Re:Obligatory Babylon 5 Quote by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, he looks more like Palpatine.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  44. That special kind of love by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates is not heading an organisation which systematically has indulged in child abuse? Yeah ok, Microsoft fucks their customers over. And their suppliers. And their partners. And the lawmakers. But those are all ADULTS!!!

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  45. Gates is less evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is less evil than the Pope. And he gives away more money, instead of taking it from people.

  46. One good reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sarah Palin wasn't on the list.

    1. Re:One good reason by djlemma · · Score: 1

      That would be because it was a list of most admired MEN. Sarah Palin ranked #2 on the list of most admired women....

  47. Content by Wowsers · · Score: 0

    Dear Bill,

    I admire you so much I switched from Windows to Linux, an operating system I can control, not one where you / Microsoft think everything I produce is yours, and I don't have to constantly justify to you my legit copy of Windows as legit.

    Could you please refund me the cost of MS-DOS 5, MS-DOS 5.1, Windows 3.0, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98SE, Windows XP.

    Yours
    A more contended computer user.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Content by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      ... and I don't have to constantly justify to you my legit copy of Windows as legit ... Could you please refund me the cost of MS-DOS 5, MS-DOS 5.1, Windows 3.0, Windows 3.1, Windows 95, Windows 98SE, Windows XP.

      How many of those did you pay for?

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    2. Re:Content by Wowsers · · Score: 1

      How many of those did you pay for?

      All paid for.

      --
      Take Nobody's Word For It.
  48. What's the problem? by drmitch · · Score: 1

    And that's the way it should be. Any Catholic should follow their faith and not worship false idols anyways. The same cannot be said for Windows lovers.

    1. Re:What's the problem? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Behold the beautiful icons bestowed unto us in Windows 7!

  49. $$$ spirituality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big surprise.

  50. Everyone was Expecting the Spanish Inquisition! by FoolishOwl · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Everyone was Expecting the Spanish Inquisition! by mercurywoodrose · · Score: 1

      who is dick cheney to pope john pauls george w. The current pope has no chance in hell of being as loved as his predecessor. hes just a filler while the church slowly burns to the ground under its weight of contradictions and CONSCIOUSLY EVIL ACTIONS.

      --
      You hear about the person who didn't rely on anecdotal evidence to support his belief system?
    2. Re:Everyone was Expecting the Spanish Inquisition! by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      For the record, and for whoever modded this insightful, this was a joke, referencing a Monty Python sketch. I'm no fan of the Pope, but I don't really seriously associate him with the Spanish Inquisition, just because he held the title that was associated with it centuries ago.

      Now I remember why I've been avoid the use of satire and sarcasm.

  51. Americans admire wealth by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and the notion that you can get super rich coming from humble beginnings. That said, the funny part is Bill Gates comes from money. His day was a rich, well connected business lawyer whose experience & connections gave Bill what he needed to succeed, and the 1 million dollar trust fund in 1970 didn't hurt either. I guess the illusion is all that counts.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  52. Re:ADMIRED??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget, a lot of "Jesus freaks" aren't Catholic. Protestants don't tend to be that enamored of the Pope.

  53. Relative Terms by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    I hate Bill Gates, but I admire him more than I do the Pope. Yes, that's how much I don't admire the Pope at all.

  54. Where is the news? sample size & error margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to TFA, a grand total of 1,019 people were polled, giving a grand view of 0.00036% of the population of one country.
    How is such a small sample size indicitive of the rest of the country, much less the rest of the world.

    On top of this, according to the source of TFA, the poll posts a margin of error is +/- 4%, making any such statement as "Gates better than Pope) completely erroneous.

    Seriously /. ?

  55. I Love Beck! by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Beck is awesome...Two Turntables, baby! I didn't know his first name was Glen.

  56. Take a look at the list and judge the voters by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most admired men, Top 3: Obama, Bush, Clinton.
    Most admired women, Top 3: Clinton, Palin, Oprah.

    So the top 3 admired men are the 3 most recent presidents (in order of forgetting). The top 3 women are two loudmouths and a dimwit. Pick yourself who is what.

    I refuse to believe that this survey is representative for the US population. I know too many US people to simply assume that this is what Americans admire.

    I'd rather have the gut feeling that this is what could be reached at home during daytime, i.e. when people who have a job go to work...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Take a look at the list and judge the voters by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Take a look at the list and judge the voters by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      I refuse to believe that this survey is representative for the US population. I know too many US people to simply assume that this is what Americans admire.

      Surveys without a list of candidates are always heavily biased to well-known people.

    3. Re:Take a look at the list and judge the voters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would wager at least two of the three women listed would still be at the top if the survey was representative of the US population. You do realize women comprise over half our population?

    4. Re:Take a look at the list and judge the voters by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have the gut feeling that this is what could be reached at home during daytime, i.e. when people who have a job go to work...

      As with most polls, really.

      It's stunning to me that Palin is in there at all. How do you manage to admire someone who quits an elected position halfway through because she doesn't like the questions the media are asking, or that is so blatantly uninformed, misinformed, and even downright ignorant?

      I think it would be really interesting if the poll included the interviewee's source of news. I wonder what this poll would look like if you took Faux News viewers out of it.

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    5. Re:Take a look at the list and judge the voters by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You can refuse to believe all you want, but I firmly believe that that survey is representative of the US population. Americans are really stupid people these days. (I'm American, BTW.)

      All you have to do is look at who's being elected, and what's selling in the media. Oprah's the richest woman in the world because her show is so popular, Palin is still very popular with the Tea Party folks and her books have made her tons of money, and the election results speak for themselves.

      Maybe the small subculture of America that you hang out with doesn't hold these people in high regard, but the general population isn't like the geeks in your circle of friends.

  57. Sounds like a classic book plot by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, I can't shake the feeling that I've read that kind of argumentation before. Is it ok to do something evil, just because then you'll use (some of) the ill gotten gains to do something good? Oh, right, that's Dostoevsky's "Crime And Punishment".

    Turns out that in America you can actually be admired for being a modern day Raskolnikov.

    It also turns out that you don't even have to do all that soul-searching and all, either.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2

      Your reference to Crime and Punishment is interesting, but Gates is more similar to Jean Valjean than Raskolnikov.

      Long departed from the life of crime, he is still hounded by the amateur Javerts that skulk around /.

    2. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      On the scale of evil of most normal people violating monopoly legislation in the software market falls somewhere in the region of having once kicked a puppy.

      compared to how most "old money" rich got rich he's positively shining.

    3. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      What did Bill Gates do that was evil?

      Seriously... evil?
      Ooooh... his company bundled software and used aggressive sales techniques and contracts.

      It might be against the law. But it's not evil... nor do I think morally wrong in of itself.
      Not everything illegal is evil.
      not everything good is legal or mandated.

    4. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I can't shake the feeling that I've read that kind of argumentation before. Is it ok to do something evil, just because then you'll use (some of) the ill gotten gains to do something good? Oh, right, that's Dostoevsky's "Crime And Punishment".

      Turns out that in America you can actually be admired for being a modern day Raskolnikov.

      It also turns out that you don't even have to do all that soul-searching and all, either.

      Are you seriously calling Bill Gates "evil"? The argument you give is completely valid, but most unbiased people would agree that Bill Gates has contributed much more to the world than he has taken away.

    5. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      That's a heck of a stretch. Raskolnikov believed himself superior to the great masses, not because he was a student or because of any great aim, but inherently superior. (At least during part of the story; Raskolnikov is nothing if not a tortured and introspective soul).

      Bill Gates did not plan murder, and he did not plan something evil. He started a software company, probably for no other reason than he wanted to make money and this seemed to be something he was good at doing. Minus several million for usurping one of my favorite classics, Moraelin. You cheapen Bill Gates, Dostoevsky, and evil-doers in general. I am going to cease liking you now.

    6. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      He lied about having an operating system for sale, sold it for millions, then went and bought one from a friend for $50k to "help him through a rough spot". Violating anti-trust laws is bad. Manipulating and stabbing your friends in the back is evil.

    7. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      That's a heck of a stretch. Raskolnikov believed himself superior to the great masses, not because he was a student or because of any great aim, but inherently superior. (At least during part of the story; Raskolnikov is nothing if not a tortured and introspective soul).

      And you'll find that a lot of the sociopaths and narcisists at the top of various corporations believe themselves to be superior to the mass of unwashed plebs. Well, they don't do much introspection, though, so I guess there's still a difference.

      Bill Gates did not plan murder, and he did not plan something evil. He started a software company, probably for no other reason than he wanted to make money and this seemed to be something he was good at doing.

      Actually, you'll find that Microsoft's anti-competitive behaviour was very much planned and deliberate. They actually deliberately introduced code to break other programs for example. That's the kind of thing they got on trial for, not just being good at something.

      Well, except when that something is "breaking the law to protect a monopoly." They were actually very good at that.

      Minus several million for usurping one of my favorite classics, Moraelin. You cheapen Bill Gates, Dostoevsky, and evil-doers in general.

      Yes, I'm sure that fans of Palpatine, Lex Luthor and the Joker will have their day ruined by this ;)

      I am going to cease liking you now.

      Awww ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    8. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by lwriemen · · Score: 1

      What did Bill Gates do that was evil?

      Seriously... evil?

      He took away people's freedom of choice.

    9. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's not evil when you do it.

    10. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      I would argue though that depriving a market from optimum prices and a competitive feature landscape is somewhat less evil than murdering someone in cold blood.

      Interesting comparison though. Maybe someone should rework Crime and Punishment and put it into the Microserfs landscape. And I'm genuinely curious what Gates thinks of his current philanthropic work: is it atonement, legacy building or reaping the fruits of his hard work?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:Sounds like a classic book plot by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, I never said that the two are perfectly on par. Analogies are only supposed to illustrate one aspect, not be a 100% equivalence between two things. The only thing perfectly equivalent to MS's monopoly is MS's monopoly, which kinda isn't a very useful analogy.

      But in the end we have plenty of other crimes around that don't involve axe murder and we still don't like them. We have the likes of, say, Ken Lay who "only" cooked the books and scammed a bunch of investors. Would it be ok if _those_ got to keep their ill gotten gains and pass for philantropy heroes with the money gained from that scam?

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  58. More than the pope, less then GW Bush... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Read it and weep. I assume you're packing your bags already...

    --
    No sig today...
  59. Re:ADMIRED??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen people generalising, and insulting a nation or a nationality in general. You managed to insult every individual person in a nation. That's actually quite impressive.

  60. Not difficult !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you take into account that the pope is based on nothing (PS, for those who don't know it, Jesus never existed, neither Marie, neither Joseph, neither a lot of them). It is only a story, like any novel out there !

    A bit like you'd say : Americans admire Bill Gates more than James Bond !!

    So, the next step, tear down the churches, remove the vatican and give the money they have to the people who need it !!!

    Now the Dalaï Lama, that's another story.

    I've never heard of Glenn Beck !!!! (I'm not Americn, and don't want to be ...)

  61. Re:ADMIRED??? by wjousts · · Score: 1

    Bye then.

  62. Everything old is new again by rssrss · · Score: 1

    40 years ago, John Lennon said that the Beatles were bigger than Jesus.

    OTOH, I have never cursed the Pope by name, but I have often cursed Bill Gates while recovering from a crash or a lock-up.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  63. Re:ADMIRED??? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Why?

    If you admire business success he checks that box.

    If you admire charitable works he checks that box.

    If you admire wealth he checks that box.

    If you admire brains he built a tech company before tech companies were cool which checks that box.

    If you admire brawn, then he's not your man.

    Note, that "checks that box" doesn't mean if you dig into it he was great. It doesn't matter if he was a great business man, or just lucky, or just a monopolistic parasite. It doesn't matter if he is or isn't smart.

    This is admiration from people who have never been in the same room as the guy. Impression is all that matters.

  64. Given the stuff the pope is saying... by unwesen · · Score: 1

    ... how is that a surprise? Are you surprised that Americans are, on average, more intelligent than you thought? Shame on you!

  65. Re:ADMIRED??? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    Bill has both the philanthropic bleedinghearts and the sociopathic profit Uber Alles demographic absolutely sewn up

    Those two are mutually exclusive.

  66. If you go to the Vatican by Centurix · · Score: 1

    You can see the Pope's MVP certificate.

    --
    Task Mangler
  67. It's all very well but ... by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    ... like all polls, it's only a snapshot. What would be more useful would be to see a running poll over the years and see where the changes lie. Obama is in there because he is the current president. The fact Carter is still in there is quite telling.

    Also, you have to ask yourselves how do people answer these. Were they asked in a quick phonecall? Were they asked to think about it and reply? I think the answers may be a little different in both these cases.

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  68. Wow, Bill Gates is really compared to the Pope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates:
    Represents technology and it's advancement to where we are today.

    The Pope:
    Represents child molesters.

    Any questions?

    1. Re:Wow, Bill Gates is really compared to the Pope? by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      Even put more true to how things are...

      Bill Gates:
      Represents a callous sociopathic corporation who used embrace-extend-extinguish business tactics to gain it's position, then utilized shear political, corporate, and economic brute force to eradicate competition when possible.

      The Pope:
      Represents a callous sociopathic corporation who internally uses passive agressive business tactics, and externally utilizing an embrace-extend-extinguish business model to gain it's position, utilizing physical warfare tactics to eradicate competition when possible.

      Even when stretched to full description, it's still the same... wow...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    2. Re:Wow, Bill Gates is really compared to the Pope? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Because child rape is JUST LIKE bundling IE in windows.

  69. What is the alternative argument? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    That rich entrepreneurs should just do like Steve Jobs and keep it all for themsevles? Or are you arguing that no one should be allowed to be a rich entrepreneur?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  70. Seems right. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    Any harm Bill Gates has done has been mostly to other businesses, and people who aren't gong to suffer unduly as a result. His charitable endeavours have very likely saved thousands of lives, and improved the quality of life of more than enough people to more than make up for any of the harm MS has done. He is inoffensive and doesn't poublicly judge others. All in all, whether he believes in God or not, he has many of the attributes a good Christian should admire.

    Pope Benedict has actively campaigned against measures to reduce AIDS in Africa. He's helped cover up hideous sexual offences. He's highly judgemental, and regularly blames those not of his faith for the problems of the world. All in all, he has few of the attributes a good Christian should admire.

    Quite honestly, I'm surprised Bill Gates didn't rank higher.

  71. Impressive philanthropy and unimpressive evil by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

    In the 80s and early 90s, Gates looked like the kind of business-villain the world has known and disliked for centuries. Since then, however, he has largely removed himself from business decisions and the world has discovered a new kind of corporate supervillain. Gates and his old school business tricks will never be able to compete with today's evil businessmen like Zuckerberg, Page and Brin. They're aiming to profit by creating a dystopian future; Gates merely chased his profit by conniving to create a future with a skewed market share. In terms of evil he just can't compete, and when you try to compare the fraction of wealth given away for charity, today's villains don't even register against Gates.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  72. Well... by palmerj3 · · Score: 1

    [Insert obligatory remark about child molestation here]

  73. sermon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know a few users who give quite the sermon when using the Windows Driven Computer.

  74. With one important difference by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With one important difference: Jean Valjean's fortune isn't a direct result of his crimes. He doesn't get to be the good guy by robbing Paul to give to Peter, no matter how far apart the two events are. Whereas Gates is getting to be the public philantropist hero with money made by breaking the antitrust laws in the '90's.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:With one important difference by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      There is another story of a beloved criminal, you know. Robin Hood.

      The criminal believes himself innocent and has no need to redeem himself. It is simply a given that people respect and admire a rogue who marches to his own drumbeat.

    2. Re:With one important difference by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      People respect criminals only so long as they are taking other people's money.

    3. Re:With one important difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Macs were (and still are) a ripp off. Before Windows came out they had a total monopoly on operating systems using visual computer interfaces...

      it doesn't take a genius to work out that there is not a law in the land that can stop this being copied... as long as it uses different styles and naming conventions.

      My Grandad had a lot of Mac stuff because it was easy to use and powerfull, in comparison to what else was available. Now OSX is cheaper than XP, and the best (Ubuntu) is Free!

    4. Re:With one important difference by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Mac: 1984
      Windows: 1985
      Amiga: 1985
      Atari ST: 1985
      C64 Geos: 1986

      While, it may be true that Mac was first to market, it isn't like they were the only ones on the market for long, and SOMEONE has to be first. It it wasn't Mac, it would have likely been Amiga, or Atari.

  75. Re:ADMIRED??? by hodet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would you assume this? If one was to only read Slashdot they would think Bill Gates is an evil borg that has caused untold misery on millions and millions of people because of his monopolistic ways. Fact is non techs admire him because he lived/lives the dream. They see him as the ultimate success and what is possible in America. Americans like to live large, and what better example of excess can you find then Bill Gates? Also the TFA shows 2% or respondents so its not like a bursting dam of love.

  76. And just disgusting people by fnj · · Score: 1

    Bingo. Actually, the top 3, and #5, all turn my stomach. A poll like this goes a long way toward explaining how dim bulb slimeballs win elections and predominate as the heads of soulless mega-corporations.

  77. And another thing... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    The greatest thing Bill Gates did wasn't to donate several million dollars. It's great that he did but what is much more improtant is that he applied a more business like method to measuring the success of a charity. The simple calculation of dollars per life saved rather than how low overheads are.

    If a charity has low overheads but spends twice as much as it needs to on medicine, then it makes sense to hire a negotiator. That actually increases overheads but also increses efficiency.

    It's a simple innovation but extremely important.

  78. As he should be. by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates has done more for humanity than all of the Popes put together. I dislike a lot of what Bill Gates does but I won't say he has not done a lot for everyone. We wouldn't be sitting here discussing technology as it is if it weren't for him. They may have never had a keen eye for design or innovation, but they were and are the suits and they have shaped our world. The Pope is a figurehead that produces nothing and benefits no one. I admire my dog more than the Pope. Similarly I admire thousands of people more than Bill Gates.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
  79. How dumb are people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can anyone admire scumbag politicians like Obama, Bush and Clinton above someone like Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? People are stupid.

    1. Re:How dumb are people? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      How can anyone admire scumbag politicians like Obama, Bush and Clinton above someone like Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? People are stupid.

      Even Bush and Obama are more concerned with Jobs than themselves. Heck, they're always talking about recreating more Jobs (presumably after he passes).

  80. silver or lead by migloo · · Score: 1

    Probably as popular as Pablo Escobar, and for similar reasons.

  81. Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "even Glenn Beck"? Why in the fucking world would anyone expect Glenn Beck to be more popular? I have to admit, in a choice between syphilis and Glenn Beck, I would probably choose Glenn Beck. Probably.

  82. Troll tag by Halifax+Samuels · · Score: 1

    I see the "troll" tag was removed but the "and even Glenn Beck" comment still remains.

  83. He gave billions of your money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He gave billions of your money. And, despite all that giving away, he was still richer 10 years after giving it away than when he started. So in what sense has he "given away"? He lost more wealth when the economy dropped a bit (in comparison with other countries wealthiest) than he's given away.

  84. Re:ADMIRED??? by MareLooke · · Score: 1

    He's not a borg?? Scratch my vote please.

  85. Setting a low bar? by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    Many non-Catholics are ambivalent towards the Pope, and a few are even outright hostile; the church sex scandal cover-ups don't help either. Most people probably don't know enough about the Dalai Lama to have a strong opinion. And Glenn Beck?! Jeez, get real...

    I have a grudging respect for Gates and his business savvy, in much the way that one can respect the abilities of a ruthless predator. As an engineer it irks me tremendously that MS managed to become the dominant force in the software industry, with products whose quality has ranged from competent to cringe-inducingly awful. I applaud his philanthropy, but the cynic in me says that his motivation for the creation of his charities was not entirely altruistic, coming as it did in the midst of the DOJ anti-trust investigations into Microsoft's business practices. Still, whether his motivations were pure or not I believe he's doing some good things now, and is deserving of respect.

    I wouldn't put him anywhere near as high as #5 though.

    Ballmer and Allen on the other hand... well, let's not go there.

  86. Re:ADMIRED??? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Nevertheless, he manages it. Humans aren't exactly know for their long memories or logical consistency.

    I suspect it has to do with the fact that he as the "classical robber baron" thing going on, in an age where that is largely extinct. Back in the robber baron days, you had highly recognizable individuals who piled up huge fortunes by dubiously ethical/legal means(monopoly power on a scale that actually made the Sherman antitrust act popular, shooting strikers, that sort of thing); but then spent a pretty substantial chunk of it on pieces of civic infrastructure with their name on them.

    Today, when so many fortunes are either in the hands of people who have nothing more than their yacht named after them, or in the hands of largely opaque capital management groups that studiously avoid having any recognizable personalities whatsoever, classical robber-baronism is practically charming...

  87. Glenn who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who is Glenn Beck?

  88. Re:ADMIRED??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ bribed their way into the local government numerous time and our tax money went straight to them , hundreds of thousands of licences for public institutions.
    And you know what ? I'm glad it did , if they didn't take it someone else would've stolen the money , the government would still be corrupt. At least this way old Bill here have some of it away to deserving charities.

  89. Re:It's a given by Combatso · · Score: 1

    i wouldnt consider mod points "power"... that aside, I agree with your description of the poop.

  90. Re:ADMIRED??? by peragrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't like Catholics, however even I know John Paul II was a much better person than Gates. The Current Pope just seems like he doesn't care.

    So we do need to quantify which Pope. The Pope that is or the one that was while Bill Gates was in office.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  91. Because .... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... Windows is a bigger religion.

    (Ducking and running)

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  92. Glenn Beck Admired? by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 2

    That is a truly troubling thought.

    1. Re:Glenn Beck Admired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admire hit guts to bring internet trolling to TV.

      Also have to hate him for being a troll though.

  93. Re:ADMIRED??? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    If one was to only read Slashdot they would think Bill Gates is an evil borg that has caused untold misery on millions and millions of people because of his monopolistic ways.

    It would seem then that Slashdot has a pretty accurate picture of the situation. With the understanding that we all know he was not actually decanted in a borg cube.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  94. Anti-Catholicism by Stargoat · · Score: 1

    I'm an atheist and thus the most hated minority in the United States. But the most hated majority in the United States are the Catholics. There is a great deal of antipathy for the Catholic Church among Baptists and other Protestant denominations. When Haiti was smashed by the earthquake last year, there were many evangelical Americans claiming that the Haitians deserved it because they were Catholic. Among these people, there are those who still drink "Confusion to the Pope".

    With these sorts of prevalent anti-Catholic feelings in the United States, how can there be any doubt that Bill Gates would be more admired than the Pope?

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:Anti-Catholicism by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      I thought God smashed Haiti flat as piss on plate because of their heathen Voodoo devil worshiping. Your saying it's not because they weren't Catholic enough, but because they were too Catholic? I wish God would make up His mind.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    2. Re:Anti-Catholicism by Stargoat · · Score: 1

      They were Voodoo Devil Worshipers because they were Catholic. It's all the same thing, really.

      --
      Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  95. Re:ADMIRED??? by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

    You don't know that. Maybe Microsoft is just **WAY BETTER** at hiding and shuffling pedophiles around the world than the Catholic Church is?

  96. It's his money, not him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course people who worship money will admire Gates.

  97. when the bars so low, how can you not? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    When the bar's so low, it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to miss. This guy's dark as sin, which is ironic.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  98. Why should the pope be admired? by jjohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Outside of Catholic bashing by competing denominations, why should someone admire the Pope, either the office itself or Benedict personally? Aside from the extremely mixed record of the Catholic Church, Benedict was personally involved in covering up sex abuse scandals in Europe. When he wasn't doing that, he was pushing a conservative brand of Catholicism that rejected both abortion and birth control, and is rigidly anti-gay. He's not a moral exemplar, he hasn't accomplished great works of charity or mercy, and he's generally a force for nothing but the preservation of a worldwide institution's survival and autonomy.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    1. Re:Why should the pope be admired? by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Because your view of the world isn't the only one, and some people do admire the things you clearly don't about the Pope.

      Is it so hard to understand that people have different view points of the world? What you think is right and just is not the same as what I think is right and just.

      I'm certainly not advocating raping little boys or gay bashing, but I am against abortion in principal and see abstinence as a valid form of birth control for people who can actually keep their dicks in their pants/legs closed, which clearly isn't everyone.

      I'm not alone, nor does the entire world share my point of view. I neither like nor dislike him, I simply don't care about him.

      What I can't understand is why people such as yourself don't realize your viewpoint isn't the only viewpoint in existence. The world does not revolve around you. No two people share the exact same set of values.

      Your lack of understanding that other people have their own minds and opinions is just amazing. The fact that so many people are so ignorant is far more frightening than anything Benedict has done.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Why should the pope be admired? by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      Is it so hard to understand that people have different view points of the world?

      It's not hard to understand at all. The fact that I ask questions about why the Pope should be a generally admired figure (the assertion of which, in itself, implies that there's only one acceptable viewpoint on the matter) doesn't mean I think other's viewpoints are either wrong or irrelevent. Offering my reasons why I think that the Pope shouldn't be generally admired doesn't preclude others from having a different viewpoint.

      What I can't understand is why people such as yourself don't realize your viewpoint isn't the only viewpoint in existence.

      Your reponse would have been much more interesting if you hadn't locked yourself into this irrelevent tangent. On topics like birth control and abortion, I have no problem accepting that the issue is arguable, at least. I think the larger consequences of the church's stance on being against both at the same time present another (arguable) issue. Presenting my viewpoint without a bunch of "reasonable people can disagree...." noise doesn't mean I outright reject the possibility of disagreeing. I'm just presenting my viewpoint.

      I'm certainly not advocating raping little boys or gay bashing, but I am against abortion in principal and see abstinence as a valid form of birth control for people who can actually keep their dicks in their pants/legs closed, which clearly isn't everyone.

      I'm glad you condemn child rape. The larger point I made by acknowledging that the Catholic Church's record is mixed (implying that the church has done good in the past as well as evil) is that, even if you agree with some of Benedict's positions, he has other positions and actions that should preclude general admiration. If you disagree with that, then disagree with it rather than trying to poison the well by claiming that I'm intolerant.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:Why should the pope be admired? by Degro · · Score: 0

      The pope hasn't done anything besides wear his silly costume and feed people's paranoid delusions.

    4. Re:Why should the pope be admired? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Uhm... You didn't answer the question. You simply attacked the poster for asking the question. It's a valid question and the question still stands.

      So why should The Pope be admired? What has he done that people with different viewpoints from me and the GP might admire?

  99. Re:ADMIRED??? by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

    yeah... because building a multi-billion dollar company and ending up on the top of PC revolution is not something to be admired... /s

  100. Methodology? by tragedy · · Score: 1

    Any information anywhere on how this telephone poll was conducted? Were people asked to name their single most admired person and that persons count was increased or they were added to the list? Or possibly asked for their top 3,5,7,10, etc. If we got to look at the raw data, would there be a thousands of outliers with a single vote (probably mostly consisting of peoples parents :) ) and a smaller cluster of people with multiple votes? Or, were people simply given a pre-compiled list of people and asked to rank them somehow? I think some variation on the pre-compiled list is probably a lot more likely. I also think it's pretty likely that this poll was conducted specifically on USA Today subscribers, so it will have a bias right off the bat.

  101. That's got yet another significant difference by Moraelin · · Score: 2

    That's got yet another significant difference, though.

    The likes of Robin Hood and later Dick Turpin were lionized precisely because of a rise in popular sentiment against the era's equivalent of Bill Gates. Especially in the 18'th and 19'th centuries, as the slow rise of industrialism created a class of people even poorer and more exploited than even the medieval serfs had ever been.

    And we're also talking an age when child labour rose to the extent of deliberately planning some mine shafts so they could only fit a child crawling to pull a cart of coal, because, you know, fuck you, it would be too expensive to do that for/with adults. It was an age when the parliament ruled that setting a house on fire with people still in, as a way to kick out them and make room for more pasture land where the hose was, is perfectly within the rights of the owner and in fact it would be a violation of their property rights if you told them not to. (A bit later they relented and did stipulate that you must give them 24 hour notice before doing that, which just drives home the point that before that just showing up with a torch was perfectly ok.)

    It was an age where it was ok to "adopt" or even just kidnap a small army of orphans and use them as basically slave labour (no law said you had to pay your children, after all.) Including for some jobs like cleaning under mechanical looms while they're still running, and routinely mangled or scalped one of those children. (Having hair and crawling under fast spinning wheels and shafts kinda produced the results you'd expect.) Or for such delightful jobs as chimney sweep... and just light a fire under them if they don't want to go up the chimney. Etc.

    The class who made vast fortunes at the expense of others, and then made public displays of piety and charity with those money, wasn't loved at all by the poor and even middle class.

    Any criminal who robbed from the rich -- also giving to the poor was just icing on the cake, rather than a necessary ingredient -- was an instant darling of that mass of discontent poor. And I mean, seriously, forget Robin Hood, they lionized the likes of Dick Turpin which was as base and vile a criminal as it gets. Even with the spiral to the bottom in Hollywood, it's not the kind of guy you'd call even an anti-hero these days, and certainly not the Han Solo kind of lovable rogue. But he robbed from the rich and that was enough.

    So that nowdays someone like Bill Gates could pass for a Robin Hood, rather than the villain... is... proof that times have changed a lot, to say the least.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:That's got yet another significant difference by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Moving away from this discussion of criminality could spare us from rehashing the same old arguments. What this article was discussing was public perception, and in this sense, none of the characterizations we've proffered so far really match up.

      Carnegie, Ferdinand de Lesseps, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt - these are men who are both highly admired for their achievements and just as highly detested for the manner in which they reached their achievements.

  102. Re:ADMIRED??? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

    Did Gates speak out against condom use that would have prevented the spread of AIDS?
    Was Gates trying to make sure that the population grew as much as possible so there would be more customers for what he was selling, even if the over population caused famine?

    No I thought not, as far as I am aware the same can't be said for John Paul II.

    So no I don't think it matters which Pope because everyone I look at I see in their works moments of moral behaviour which to me (and pretty much most of the civilised world) are abhorrent. For an organisation which sells itself as a moral authority I can't see how people don't see this.

    --
    "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  103. This is news? by SirAstral · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about studies where people simply changed their behavior towards people once they found out that they had money. Even if they did not like the person in question they still acted less hostile or even became friendly after revelations.

    It's simple, for reasons we all know personally, yet never want to admit publicly people always treat rich people better because they hope, just like the lottery that they can somehow parlay it someway or somehow into personal gain of some kind. Most will even do it for bragging rights or to just say I meet so-and-so once and had a 5 minute conversation and them people think of them as total geniuses. Well what do you expect. If you idolize someone your brain is actively dismissing the shit stain on their forehead and overemphasizing their powers of speech to the point you would consider a drunken homeless guy a great orator!

    Lets take Sigourney Weaver. The Woman is near ugly as sin, but some people keep calling her hot! Yes its perfectly natural to call ugly women beautiful when they are in power. Kinda like being the Queen. You didn't dare not call her Royal Ugliness anything but the most desired woman in the room!

  104. not a fan of either one, but... by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    lets see, who do i like better...

    some rich guy that sells software and bullies his competition...

    or..

    some rich guy that distributes pedophile priests and covers up their crimes...

    Gates wins as the lesser of two evils :)

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  105. Most admirable bank account . . . by sfarber53 · · Score: 1

    and least successful company. I cannot imagine why anyone would admire Bill. Microsoft is a company waiting to die for all of its bad designs, bad attitudes and general abuse of the public weal.

    Frankly, I won't have anything to do with them now that I've learned better (actually some time ago).

    --
    Like the inimitable Groucho Marx, I would never join a club that would have me as a member.
  106. Catholicism by NuKe_MoNgOoSe · · Score: 0

    As the next generation emerges in maturity they are firing final blows at a dead concept, the Pope is a patriarch of a dying institution. People are no longer sheep, but the shepherds and if they are going to believe in anything it will be one another not a ancient, hipocritical framework of fearmongering and rules. People will not forget God but they are, in terms of the people in my life that I have grown up with, losing all faith in the Church and its leaders. I dont believe the Church has ever done anything in the name of God but used his name to further their own goals and ambitions. Bill Gates on the otherhand came up from nothing, revolutionized information technology, brought modern computing into the home, made it accessible to just about everyone, has donated ridiculous amounts of money in furthering the progress of humanity medically and scientifically.. He is a man to be admired, he is also a man to be feared as is any man or institution with too much power...just look at the government.

    --
    When you dislike the human race as much as I do, Karma:Bad is inevitable lol.
  107. Bill Gates, Glenn Beck by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

    Hell, I admire Bill Gates more than Glenn Beck too.

    I barely feel like punching Bill Gates in the face a tenth as much as I want to punch Glenn Beck.

  108. I believe the phrase is: by crovira · · Score: 1

    Recovering Catholic .

    As for new features, after the Spanish Inquisition I figure that less is more.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:I believe the phrase is: by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh, I didn't expect that...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  109. Annoyance factor by kstahmer · · Score: 1

    When you look at the top three most admired people: Barack Obama, George W Bush and Bill Clinton, you can immediately see poll responders were giving USA Today/Gallop extremely predicable responses.

    What pollsters don't discuss – and will never discuss – is their poll results annoyance factor. Responders are at home, intruded upon by a complete stranger, who is asking scripted, inane and repetitive questions. Responders are too polite to say, "Hey, you're bothering me. You're boring. Get lost!" So they give quick answers simply to get rid of the pollster.

    What's disturbing is how many people take these poll results seriously. Barack Obama, George W Bush and Bill Clinton aren't really the most admired men in the world. Nor, for that matter, are Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, Oprah Winfrey and Michelle Obama the most admired women in the world. They're merely unimaginative responses from people who are eager to get rid of an annoying pollster.

    --
    HRH The Duke of Windsor
  110. Re:ADMIRED??? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    How dare you offer such a reasonable dialogue about MS and Bill Gates on /., sir!!! Don't you realize he's Satan?!?!?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  111. Even more than Glenn Beck? by okmijnuhb · · Score: 2

    Wow even more than Glenn Beck? Why even throw his name in the mix? Did he do something worthy of admiration?

    1. Re:Even more than Glenn Beck? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Huge numbers of Americans listen to his show and buy his books and think he's wonderful, just like huge numbers of Americans buy Sarah Palin's books and think she would be a great President even though she quit her job as Governor and thinks Africa is a country.

  112. Re:ADMIRED??? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    The fact that Microsoft gained most of its market position through illegal actions is lost on most people.

    It's nice that Gates is "living the dream", but it's sad that he had to get there by using such underhanded and shady means.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  113. Left out in the cold by standbypowerguy · · Score: 1

    I guess they didn't poll Slashdot users...

    --
    This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
  114. Re:ADMIRED??? by coaxial · · Score: 1

    You must have read that in Encarta! (Damn I wish I could find the link to when after Encarta was bought by Microsoft, edited the Bill Gates entry to say that he was famous for being a philanthropist instead of a brutal buisness man.)

  115. Laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of you compare me to killers, drug cartel heads, Hitler? What have you done with your lives that can compare to the billions I've given?

    Slashdot is home of the bitter nerd sucking on sour grapes.

  116. Hell, I think he's a dick. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I still admire him more than the Pope.

  117. Even Glenn Beck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Even Glenn Beck? The moral paragon by which human perfection is measured?

  118. How did they conduct the survey? by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

    The poll results look more like.. "Who can you remember when I ask you for a few names during a random phone call?"

    If you just ask me for a few random famous people's name from a phone call, I'd probably answer Obama, Billy Gates too. If I say it's Mark Zuckerburg or even Linus Torvalds, I'd probably have to explain who the fuck Mark Zuckerburg or Linus Torvalds is.

  119. In Bill Gates' favor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may help that Bill Gates was never a Nazi.

  120. Do you believe, brother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Americans admire Bill Gates more than the Pope, that might just mean that the relative popularity of different religions fluctuates.

  121. Few people are Catholic by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Well duh - few people are Catholic and their numbers are ever dwindling. The Paap also hasn't done anything even remotely useful either. So no surprise there. I would also rate O'l Billybob much higher than the Paap, even though I avoid using stuff made by his old company as far as possible and don't agree with his business methods. I would even rate O'l pyramid scheme Madof higher than the Paap. Coming to think of it, even the old CEO of Enron is/was better than the Paap.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  122. Not surprising by Syberz · · Score: 1

    Seriously, I'm really not surprised. What has the pope done that deserves admiration?

    Bill has (or will anyways) given half of his fortune (what ~30 billion now?) to charity. That's admirable.

    The pope has... uh... allegedly not had sex and... uh... that's it.

    --
    ~Syberz
  123. Check useragent strings by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    I bet there is a direct correlation between IE useragent strings in the poll data and viewing Gates favorably.

  124. Was never a Nazi so far as I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite what everyone thinks, Bill Gates also wasn't in the Nazi youth either... or against contraception, etc...

    Seriously if anyone promoted contraception it was Bill.

    Ya ya I know, the pope had to join the Nazi youth, and didn't want to etc... whatever, he still was. (that even sounds weird to write it)

    I'm sure he is a wonderful guy, just not high on religion either.

    1. Re:Was never a Nazi so far as I know... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Seriously if anyone promoted contraception it was Bill.

      Agreed - if anyone's a walking advert for it it's him, the fucking twat.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  125. What is it with the Gates hate? by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    He was at the right place at the right time with the right people. The people he worked with and he himself were no slouches. I doubt you could find a group of people here who put in the hours they did when they started out. When they had to work within real constraints of very limited hardware and hand writing everything. Gates is definitely more technically inclined than Jobs ever could be.

    Read Gates bio, what he and Allen did isn't the stuff of idiots, people here might not like Windows or Microsoft, but don't deny that Gates did what few people at his time could. He had the ability and the drive at the right time. Most people lack the drive, it is what separates message board bitchers from those they bitch about

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  126. Re:ADMIRED??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um. Presumption of innocence until proven guilty?

  127. Well, yeah by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Unlike the Pope, Bill Gates has never been a member of the Nazi Youth Movement.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  128. Re:ADMIRED??? by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    feels like gates is trying to buy his way into heaven. How many did he crush on his way to his wealth?

  129. Re:ADMIRED??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what would their purpose be? Checking for back doors?

  130. Glenn Beck #6th --- VERY SCARY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuf said.

  131. the pope is a pretty low standard, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not as though the pope is particularly admirable...reactionary, bigoted, indifferent to crimes committed by his priests, controlling, and so on.

  132. Re:ADMIRED??? by SpeedyG5 · · Score: 1

    I would venture his effect of helping millions make money through products he produced has done more good than "Giving Away" his fortune. A pile of money is not as good as a money machine.

  133. 90% of the market called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears you misspelled Steve Jobs.

  134. Re: In short, I think, envy. by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

    It's easy to hate ambitious people who fantastically succeed on their business.

    While, many times, this hate might have more to do with scruples than envy, it will always be hard to separate them if people insist on belittling the amount of work needed to implement and commercialize a product/service.

    --
    "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  135. Re:Ed Roberts and Gery Kildall too by kubitus · · Score: 1
    Roberts to be the one who built and sold the first true Desktop PC for which Billy Boy and Paul Allan wrote after a PDP source code manual the Basic Interpreter

    Gery Kildal to be the one who wrote the first Desktop PC OS CP/M and who was tricked by Billy the Gates, son of a lawwyer.

    Tim Patterson who wrote the original Q-DOS stealing from CP/M.

    and so on and so on and so on

    Americans have problems in their aquaintance with the truth.

  136. Some service packs have been applied by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the First and Second Vatican Councils! They are like SP1 and SP2. The other Catholic Ecumenical Councils are like the regular updates.

  137. hmm... by mschaffer · · Score: 1

    Maybe SPI and SPII? I guess they would use Roman numerals.

  138. c'mon, Pluto! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Even if the church wasn't embroiled in its current set of scandals, it would be quite odd if several people weren't more popular than the Pope.

    Nothing new. Minnie Mouse has been since the 1970s[1]

    [1] judging by the outfits & hair, umm, "styles"

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  139. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I was going to post something along the lines of "What's the difference? One of them wears funny clothes and has a mindless herd of sexually deviant followers who believe everything he says without question, and the other one lives in Rome".

    But then I realized it wasn't about Steve Jobs.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  140. Glenn Beck? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

    I should sure as hell hope Bill Gates is more admired than Glenn Beck.

  141. Gates Foundation Critique by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Bill Gate's "philanthropy" may not be as altruistic as you seem to think.

    http://techrights.org/wiki/index.php/Gates_Foundation_Critique

  142. What a terrific choice! by Dean+Edmonds · · Score: 1

    A corporate criminal, two religious zealots and a fear-mongering gold-pimp.

    I guess the Dalai Lama is the least offensive of the lot. At least he doesn't proselytize and hasn't, to my knowledge, been the head of a conspiracy to cover up institutional pedophelia.

    --

    -deane

  143. Re:ADMIRED??? by LukeWebber · · Score: 1

    JP II was just another hidebound arsehat who blocked progress in all bust the least important directions. Condoms were off the table, and pedo-priests were at least as well shielded as they are today.

    JP I, now, was showing some promise, which is probably why he had to go.

  144. Shouldn't blame Gates for this by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Hey, never underestimate the power of "Has never covered up a massive multinational paedophilia ring" on your CV...

    To be fair, that's just because there have been a lot of bugs in the code. The productivity tools to cover up a massive multinational pedophilia ring will come standard in Office 2012.

    1. Re:Shouldn't blame Gates for this by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Who wants to sit on Uncle Clippy's lap?

  145. Circular argument by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    That just proves the superiority of Microsoft XP's EFS! =MORE reason to admire Gates, not less!

  146. Fifth most admired man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about admired women?

    The story is all about admired men, with only a passing reference to women in a sentence at the end.

    I'm a man, but... hey this is quite sexist isn't it?

  147. Re:Ed Roberts and Gery Kildall too by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    >>>Americans have problems in their aquaintance with the truth.

    I did not lie in my original post, as you are implying.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  148. Re:Ed Roberts and Gery Kildall too by kubitus · · Score: 1
    Sorry - I di not mean you!

    I thought about the presentation of things in the public: Who remembers that Bills dad is/was an outstanding lawwyer in Washington plus his mother on social terms with two IBM directors?

  149. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat shit! Recent polls conducted among a selected population of flies clearly point to...

  150. Osama Bin Laden by RewriteQuran · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised, because there are people who admire Osama Bin Laden and hence he is/was not caught.

    --
    Govt must constitute a panel to rewrite US Constitution and Quran
  151. NO PANTS FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates vs Government WIN
    Bill Gates vs Robocop WIN
    Bill Gates vs No Pants FAIL

  152. The last I knew by kuei12 · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates never used knowingly harbored child molesters in his company.

  153. More admired than even Glenn Beck?!?!?!?! by grimm26 · · Score: 1

    Gasp! On a serious note, there are more MS users and philanthropists than there are Roman Catholics. Plus, as much as people may has MS, MS never hunted and killed people for political gain.

  154. Question... by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

    How much of a philantropist is B.G. any way?
    I mean; isn't the anti-malaria project just another business?

    I know little about this (thus I'm likely wrong), but don't they demand reciving countries to accept some crazy silly copyright agreements?
    Which of course is getting B.G.Foundation or whatever it's called quite a bit of money from 'someone' ( *IAA I assume?)

    Or I do recall reading some such. Please correct & enlighten me.

    --
    urd
  155. Bill Gates & The Pope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well its not hard to understand this at all. Bill Gates doesn't put up with any of his employees preying on children. He also doesn't condone Child Porn.