Slashdot Mirror


Facebook Opens Up Home Addresses and Phone Numbers

An anonymous reader writes "Do you really want third-party app developers on Facebook to be able to access your mobile phone number and home address? Facebook has announced that developers of Facebook apps can now gather the personal contact information from their users. Security firm Sophos describes it as 'a move that could herald a new level of danger for Facebook users' and advises users to remove their home address and phone numbers from the network immediately."

459 comments

  1. YAY !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wanted this. Now to post when Ex is on vacation, and let THEM CLEAN HIM OUT !!

  2. Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear users:

    Fuck you.

    Cordially,
    Mark Zuckerberg

    1. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yet more proof that jews are not to be trusted with anything.

    2. Re:Message from Facebook by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dear Mark,

      Fuck you.

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Message from Facebook by bfree · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      With each successful push by Facebook they can re-evaluate their company upwards and until they have reached the point where such a move threatens the perceived value of the company they will push further. Once they find the point at which the value is threatened they will revert the last change and sell up.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    4. Re:Message from Facebook by Idefix97 · · Score: 0

      Makes me glad I never set up an account. People don't want to hear it, but they're so screwed by using the social networks. Disclaimer: I'm on linkedin, but that is only for professional purposes.

    5. Re:Message from Facebook by couchslug · · Score: 2

      "Dear users:

      Fuck you.

      Cordially,
      Mark Zuckerberg"

      Dear Mark,

      We lubs ur sweet Facebook and great your changes with legs akimbo.

      Grovellingly,
      Facebook Users

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It always is. Every time Facebook introduces something, they just do it and see where it gets them... hoping some things people won't notice or care. Zuckerberg's own emails/texts have elucidated that he thinks Facebook's users are all suckers and idiots. He has no sense of ethics... every step is just to see what kind of privacy-violating crap they can push because their entire model is predicated upon out-of-sight/out-of-mind selling of information to third parties in lieu of in your face advertising.

    7. Re:Message from Facebook by madprof · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's OK. I'm on Facebook but only for social purposes. So arguably even less important than LinkedIn.

    8. Re:Message from Facebook by madprof · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup, that spelling is about the level of quality you'll find on Facebook. ;)

    9. Re:Message from Facebook by Skreems · · Score: 1

      Aaaaand my account is now closed.

      I was thinking about doing this just earlier today, but thanks, Mark, for giving me a very obvious shove in the right direction.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    10. Re:Message from Facebook by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The tactic is "monetize, monetize, monetize!" Their advertisers demand more and more personal data. Now that FB is this defacto monopoly on all things social media, they'll keep handing it over for further profits. FB is a corporation, the sole reason for its existence is to make money. I don't know why people can't accept that. Its why I don't like to use it. I know that to FB we're datamining goldmines.

    11. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mark,

      Fuck you.

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      The federal government has set the bar incredibly high for that one. Facebook doesn't have the legal right to use force or threat of force to achieve its goals, so I doubt they can compete.

      If you really want to fix the root of the problem, remove all warning labels from all products. Then wait one generation. It'll sort itself out and the rest of us will be much better off.

    12. Re:Message from Facebook by twidarkling · · Score: 1

      If you really want to fix the root of the problem, remove all warning labels from all products. Then wait one generation. It'll sort itself out and the rest of us will be much better off.

      As much as I love this idea, it won't work. You also need to fix the legal system for that time so you can't sue someone for your own idiocy, or on behalf of another's idiocy.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    13. Re:Message from Facebook by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      That oh so reminds me of the Cow Clicker game. I think Facebook users have been shown in the past to be, in masses, very, very dumb.

    14. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh... you know that's not actually Mark, right?

      Well ... probably ..

    15. Re:Message from Facebook by McTickles · · Score: 1

      Correction: You THINK your account is now closed.

      Do you really think Facebook is going to delete data they can easily sell to third parties without you realizing ?

      --
      www.twilightcampaign.net

    16. Re:Message from Facebook by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Fix the legal system. The stickers will come off immediately after. Remember, stickers cost money, not having to put them on saves 0.0001 cent per unit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:Message from Facebook by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's ok, I'm also not myself.

      In all seriousness, should I ever, for some odd reason, get a Facebook account, the very last thing you'll find on it is any information about the real me. I'll get a new name, new address (hey, the phone book is full of them, just mix and match so nobody can complain about you using his personal information), new everything. Then, and only then, I shall have a facebook account.

      And if enough people do the same, the whole data collected becomes worthless. As any statistician can tell you, the only thing worse than no data is data so contaminated that it's useless.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure this is flat out illegal in the UK - Data Protection Act. They can't give out personally identifiable information without express permission - and they made some changes a few years back such that 'express permission' means the person has to manually check a box or sign something seperate. The old trick of "by using x you agree to y" doesn't work here.

    19. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear users:

      If you'd like me to, I can give your contact information to advertising agencies to provide you with targeted ads and keep Facebook free. If not, no biggie, just let me know by clicking your mouse once.

      Love,
      Mark Zuckerberg

      FTFY.

    20. Re:Message from Facebook by tkprit · · Score: 1

      I don't know... I just posted my HORROR story w/ android+fb app, but my DH said he imagined a lot of people would APPRECIATE this invasion of privacy. IOW, people might LIKE the bullshit and hell, ask for MORE! Mark Fuckerburg is giving the peepul what they want.

      /end rant

    21. Re:Message from Facebook by Nofsck+Ingcloo · · Score: 1

      'Taint funny, McGee.

    22. Re:Message from Facebook by tkprit · · Score: 1

      Yeah; junk it up, don't delete. Make up new emails, wait a day, new names, addys, like you've moved and changed nationality. Ph number = random telemarketer. Pictures from google images. MESS IT UP. (Cause they WILL keep your info in case you change your mind. So change the info.)

      Operation Muck Up Mark

    23. Re:Message from Facebook by lewko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen.

      I never set one up in the first place. Besides the huge amount of time it wastes, frankly, there's a reason I wasn't friends with people I went to school with and I have no desire to be online friends with them now.

      Privacy is like virginity. It's tempting to give it away, but you never ever get it back.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    24. Re:Message from Facebook by uctechdude · · Score: 0
      Dear User,

      You're welcome for allowing easy access for phone harassment and letting your secret fb stalker know where you live.

      I only ask that you post more to show your thanks for this.

      Love,
      Marky

      --
      Linux fixes all the cracked Windows.
    25. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mark,

      Fuck you.

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      No, that's what the TSA is for.

    26. Re:Message from Facebook by bronney · · Score: 1

      I fight for the users bro!!

    27. Re:Message from Facebook by mjwx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      By my experience, the answer to that is quite a bit.

      Just recently I decided to test just how much trolling it would take to get one of my "friends" to unfriendly me. He wasn't really a friend, I added him back in the heady days of 2007 when we added everyone and their dog. Lets just call him Frank, Frank's a bit childish and petty to start off with so I thought he'd be a perfect target. Better yet he just started to use his facebook page as an amateur marketing tool for some "artists" he was "managing" (meaning local performers he kind of hung around with). So Frank is also a bit of a pillock.

      Frank had already blocked me because I own an Android phone and Frank didn't like posts about the latest thing I was doing with it so I had to post under Franks posts. I began with intellectual trolling, countering his arguments with logical discussion, this normally ended up with "you don't know what you're talking about" being the height of his counter arguments but nothing else. After a while I moved onto Grammar Nazism, and the responses elevated to ad-hominem.

      After about a week I elevated to obvious trolling, First Post and popular memes, most of these just got deleted. After about a week he disappeared from Facebook. He still logged on but stopped posting. Finally 2 weeks later he launched one of his bad attempts to market some band, I could of kept going with conventional trolling but instead I took the nuclear option and hit him with a two girls and one cup link. 20 minutes later I received a phone call from Frank, literally in tears asking me to stop and I simply asked him why didn't he just unfriendly me. Still sobbing he said he doesn't want his friend count to go down. I was already in the process of un-friending Frank. Frank took a lot of abuse for a tiny bit of social status, I think many Facebook users would be the same.

      I've got two facebook accounts, one is my real friends (now excluding Frank and most people like Frank who I couldn't give a rats clacker about) which is a very small list. The second is an account not under my real name which has everybody added including a lot of Thai and Philippino girls (I live in OZ, it's easy to pop over to the phils for some cheap, no strings attached action, they get de-friended when they start to ask for a lot of money).

      BTW, I'm not that much of a sociopath, this is not a normal experiment for me and I was just curious as to how much abuse it would take. It kind of spiralled out of control towards the end.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    28. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is becomming (or rather, has become) 'big brother' in terms of knowing who you are, where you are, who you know and what you do in life - except this time users are joyfully and willingly handing this information over to FB without standing back and looking at the big picture.

      Suckers.

      (captcha word is apt for today: blabbing)

    29. Re:Message from Facebook by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Well, with this sort of exposure, knowing that the purpose of this will be marketing, I think I'm about to sign my business up for one and have a little fun with it.

      I know I'll get marketed to - I get to annoy them right back by throwing out my own pitch!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    30. Re:Message from Facebook by mdm42 · · Score: 1

      For professional purposes? Really? I, too am on linkedin, and have never, not even once, derived any professional benefit from being there. Seriously, I think linkedin is 100% useless for its stated purpose.

      --
      New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
    31. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately your Grammar Nazi-ism failed to correct "unfriend me" to "defriend me".

      "The pilots were debriefed", not "unbriefed".

      "His argument was logically deconstructed", not unconstructed.

      "The turkey needs to be defrosted", not "unfrosted"

      Notice the patten? de- is used as a prefix to verbs.

    32. Re:Message from Facebook by aXis100 · · Score: 2

      So far I've derived no benefit from it, but I could easily see that if I wanted to change jobs it would be very usefull.

      Many of the people I've worked with on projects in the past would be more than happy to hear from me and help me get a job on their latest project, and I'd do the same. Having one spot to hold all of that info is very handy, especially when old colleagues change their email address, phone number or location.

    33. Re:Message from Facebook by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Well played good sir,

      I never claimed my grammar is perfect, only that the other guy's was atrocious.

      But

      "The turkey needs to be defrosted", not "unfrosted"

      You forgot a full stop. Here's an extra one..

      Notice the patten? de- is used as a prefix to verbs.

      Pattern has an r in it,

      "De" should be capitalised.

      Nazism is a word also, for future reference you don't need to hyphenate it.

      P.S. I'm not normally a grammar Nazi, my grammar is not that crash hot but I couldn't resist this one for comedic value.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    34. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey - are you saying I have on ethics? Because I think FB users are idiots!

    35. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy is like virginity. It's tempting to give it away, but you never ever get it back.

      Giving up virginity is often unpleasant, but afterwards there are some rewards. Not so with privacy.

    36. Re:Message from Facebook by headLITE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm on Facebook for Farmville purposes. I'm in real life for social and professional purposes.

    37. Re:Message from Facebook by yarbo · · Score: 1

      I did this on a massive scale. I was associated with a venue and got an approval to run an event on September 11th. I advertised it with big posters with the WTC on fire and whatnot. There were horribly annoying videos in the Facebook event and a list of acts that was pretty offensive. I let a group known for getting kicked out of places have an hour of time at the show and told them they could have a pinata full of spiders at the event. I checked my friend count before I sent out invites, then sent out invites to every single person on my friends list, which was between 900 and 1000 and not a single person defriended me.

    38. Re:Message from Facebook by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      I know that to FB we're datamining goldmines

      Wouldn't that just be datamines? Or maybe gold datamines? Or data goldmines?

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    39. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      After a while I moved onto Grammar Nazism

      Hmm...

      I could of kept going

      You're an illiterate asshole.

    40. Re:Message from Facebook by GNUThomson · · Score: 1

      Dear Mark:

      Fuck you,

      Cordially,
      Users

    41. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia on Facebook third-party app developers able to access your mobile phone number and home address!

      (Somehow I am thinking of one of Bill Murray's best films)

    42. Re:Message from Facebook by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      I was associated with a venue and got an approval to run an event on September 11th. I advertised it with big posters with the WTC on fire and whatnot.

      :-)

      There were horribly annoying videos in the Facebook event and a list of acts that was pretty offensive.

      ... bbbut Facebook wasn't around in 2001 yet...

      ... a, you mean, you did this for another September 11th, during one of the following years?

      Man, this is just tasteles...

      ... but these guys did it in a much more classy way, just a couple of weeks before the real September 11th :-)

      ... or these guys (no pics, sorry, they must have pulled them all during the last ten years, but the ad pictured a structure similar to New York City's Empire State building bending out of the path of a low-flying jet. The ad slogan read, "If only all metal were Flexon." The ad appeared on the inside cover of the August 2001 issue of various optician's trade rags). And, talking about bad timing, some people found a flyer of it in their mailboxes on the morning of September 11th...

    43. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mark,

      We love your service, and love using it as pretense for a social life.

      But please, we beg you, when you ram it up us this time... lube us up. Please.

      We are still torn and bloody from the last time.

      Mindlessly yours,
      Your Losers

    44. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      Dear product,
      You look better than ever now that you're showing your shiny address and phone #. Our customers will appreciate that.

      Regards,
      Mark Suckerberg

    45. Re:Message from Facebook by ais523 · · Score: 1

      If you really want to fix the root of the problem, remove all warning labels from all products. Then wait one generation. It'll sort itself out and the rest of us will be much better off.

      The warning labels are occasionally useful, even to people who aren't idiots. For instance, I imagine nut allergy sufferers very much care about whether the products they buy are made on a processing line that handles nuts or not. Likewise, it's obvious some things are potentially damaged by heat (say, computer floppy disks, back in the days when people actually used those), but not obvious by how much. Could you put one in a car on a hot day, for instance? What about keeping one in the same bag as a freshly cooked takeway, which is currently far too hot in order that it'll still be hot by the time you manage to take it home? At least back when 5 and a quarter inch floppy disks were the standard, the packaging came with warning labels telling you the exact temperature that would cause them to start losing data. (Nowadays, data storage tends not to be so considerate.) What about the "best before" or "use by" dates that let you know when food is likely to spoil? Those are warning labels too, and yet definitely useful (even if you have a list of the spoiling rates of all the foods you habitually buy memorised, you still can't actually use them without knowing when the product was manufactured.)

      Besides, I assume that the warning labels don't make a huge difference to sufficiently stupid people anyway. Most people don't actually read them, after all.

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
    46. Re:Message from Facebook by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      How about someone set up a bunch of FB user accounts and post login details here and then we (all who don't use FB) log on as them. Let's skew their data. Do you think they can account for a user logged into 5 countries at the same time, liking random things?

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    47. Re:Message from Facebook by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And what assets does Facebook have in the UK that could be confiscated if they were prosecuted for this? Sure, it's illegal (as it is in most of the EU), but it's pretty hard to actually enforce the law. Now if only the USA would get some citizen-friendly laws...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    48. Re:Message from Facebook by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are that much of a sociopath if you ran this to the extent you claim.
      You call him childish and petty, which may be true. But people are the way they are. So he's probably not like that on purpose.
      But you on the other hand, employed an "experiment" of your own design, and took it to an extreme. On purpose!
      BTW you were probably blocked by him because your posts about your stupid little phone were most likely you trying to espouse your technical superiority through childish fanboysim, and he got sick of it.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    49. Re:Message from Facebook by TechnicalPenguin · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      The entire history of Facebook suggests that it's been nothing but a large-scale experiment to determine "just how much bullshit people will put up with."

    50. Re:Message from Facebook by wcrowe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...I could of kept going...

      As a grammar Nazi you are an amateur. It's "could have" or perhaps "could've", not "could of".

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    51. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found the flexon ad with a google image search:
      http://i.ytimg.com/vi/yXCz2fVmFC8/0.jpg

    52. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The customer is always a sucker in the .com age - otherwise they'd have the sense not to give their money to a .com - personal information is just as good now that it can be sold to people who will use it to market to you or - negating resulting profits - sell it off to "identity thieves". I just logged into Facebook to do the only thing I do on Facebook - post about how evil Facebook is and why it shouldn't be used - guess what I saw after logging in: a security update notification suggesting my precious Facebook account would be at risk if I didn't add my phone number, address, additional email addresses, and one of 4 carefully selected questions (mother's maiden name, last 5 digits of driver's license, first 3 of social security number [seriously, first 3 - after I mistakingly used my last 4 as an answer when Facebook first came out] and place of birth).

    53. Re:Message from Facebook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Dear Mark,

      Fuck you.

      I wonder if this is a tactic to see just how much bullshit people will put up with.

      I thought that was the TSA's job.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    54. Re:Message from Facebook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I'm on Facebook for Farmville purposes. I'm in real life for social and professional purposes.

      I just use it for Facebookville.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    55. Re:Message from Facebook by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately your Grammar Nazi-ism failed to correct "unfriend me" to "defriend me".

      "The pilots were debriefed", not "unbriefed".

      "His argument was logically deconstructed", not unconstructed.

      "The turkey needs to be defrosted", not "unfrosted"

      Notice the patten? de- is used as a prefix to verbs.

      Thanks for the grammar tip. I for one will try to dedo that bad habit.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    56. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook = Heroin

      They are both addicting and they both eventually kill you, just in different ways.

    57. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mark:

      Suck it. I've never posted my home address or phone numbers online ever, and Facebook is no exception. Enjoy letting developers see those currently blank fields.

      Sincerely:
        - anonymous coward, since I don't want to log in from work.

    58. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're lying, and talking bollocks. If he had blocked you, you would not have been able to post on his wall, or interact with him in any way. You sound like a cunt, too. Enjoy fucking the 12 year old filipinos.

    59. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add "could of" to "could have" to your grammar nazi rule base. :)

    60. Re:Message from Facebook by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      However, I untied my shoelaces, not detied them.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    61. Re:Message from Facebook by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      I had a quick look at your website from your /. page, and I have to say it doesn't look like you would be in a position to have much benefit from being linked in.

      I've gotten 4 unsolicited job offers that I would have considered if certain circumstances were different, so although I technically have not benefitted I very well could have.

    62. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add me! I gift every day!

    63. Re:Message from Facebook by Skreems · · Score: 1

      I did go through and delete everything first. Who knows what that actually does, but it's probably the same as overwriting it with something.

      I did notice that at some point in the past 2 years they lost all my music/movies/books preferences, so there's a fair bit of data gone without me even having to do anything.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    64. Re:Message from Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy is like virginity. It's tempting to give it away, but you never ever get it back.

      you miss your virginity?

    65. Re:Message from Facebook by alexo · · Score: 1

      As a grammar Nazi you are an amateur. It's "could have" or perhaps "could've", not "could of".

      You're all amateurs!

  3. Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You would be FUCKING STUPID to put your home address and phone numbers on facebook at all..

    3rd party devs want access to people who are that stupid. they are worth money. alot of money.

    I don't see any issue here.

    1. Re:Duh? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Phone numbers and home addresses are public knowledge already — it's called a phone book.

      If you want to be ex-directory, then you wouldn't put this info on your Facebook profile in the first place.

    2. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mobile phone numbers are public? Since when?

    3. Re:Duh? by Calydor · · Score: 1

      No. Just ... No.

      Unless you have a very, very unique name (like M. Zuckerberg, probably) your Facebook profile can't easily be linked to your appearance in a phone book. No one will know if the Billy Smith they see on Facebook living "somewhere in Oregon" is B. Smith #36 in the phone book. If they can actually get that information off your profile the game changes completely.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    4. Re:Duh? by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      If Facebook is a phone book, it's the first phone book to record everyone's numbers and addresses, no matter where they are. It is not a local source of information, as actual phone books are.

    5. Re:Duh? by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you want to be ex-directory, then you wouldn't put this info on your Facebook profile in the first place.

      You might put it there for your friends, especially if you were promised that this info would remain private or shared only with people you authorize.

      To then suddenly have the rules change is just unconscionable.

      But as long as people like you jump in to defend every privacy violation facebook comes up with we can all pretty much expect it to continue.

      Or maybe it will just die when people finally realize the meat market isn't helping them or making them any happier.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Duh? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Since phonebook where invented. I estimate for 50-100 years. Of course you can ask to be delisted..

    7. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, there was no phone book for mobile #'s...

    8. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      not to point the obvious, but he said MOBILE phone numbers.

    9. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people only cell phones now, which are not listed in the phone book, and therefore the address is lot listed either.

    10. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe where you live, but all of my friends have only mobile phones (no land lines) and neither they nor I are listed in any phone book. I just searched for phone numbers on a few of them as well as myself and turned up nothing. Our locations include NY, CA, and MD.

    11. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but you normally can't link a person's online identity with a phone number and address using just a phone book.

    12. Re:Duh? by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

      It seems like to me you have never been to http://www.whitepages.com/

    13. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Directories are a thing of the past for anyone (and that's a lot of people) who cut the landline in favor of a cell phone.

      That said, I don't have any reason to list or even input that information on facebook. Hometown is as close as I get. Anyone who needs it either knows it or can ask in a message.

    14. Re:Duh? by formfeed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No one will know if the Billy Smith they see on Facebook living "somewhere in Oregon" is B. Smith #36 in the phone book. If they can actually get that information off your profile the game changes completely.

      And that time will come eventually. And it will apply to all your old data as well.

      Companies are data mining like crazy. I never put personal information online, but since companies are scanning in public records and then connect that information, they do have my age, my address, two of my last three residences correctly identified, and got me linked correctly to my in-laws. The income bracket they guessed from the neighborhood.

      Within the next couple years some company will be able to come up with a probabilistic algorithm that links this information to your face book account. People will be able to buy a profile of you that includes your personal data, all old blog posts (analyzed for character flaws) and some old college pictures of you, some friend had on line years ago. And a few more years and picture recognition software will be able to start with known pictures and then find you on other pictures, pattern recognition will be able to determine the likely author of anonymous rants. And that all can be done on old data, that was never meant to come back 20 years later.

    15. Re:Duh? by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      alot of money?

    16. Re:Duh? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      If you want to be ex-directory, then you wouldn't put this info on your Facebook profile in the first place.

      You might put it there for your friends, especially if you were promised that this info would remain private or shared only with people you authorize.

      My phone number is on Facebook, along with my email address. It's useful for people with a Facebook account, especially if they have a smartphone that can automatically add it to their address book.

      I've just rechecked my privacy settings, and it's still set to be visible to "Friends only".

      Under "Instant Personalization" there's another tick-box that starts with a big video (which I'm not going to watch) and some text saying how great it is to share my information with "selected partners". The box is ticked and greyed out, since "my account isn't enabled for this yet". That's wrong -- I should be able to untick that box before the service is enabled.

      However, since I've had only one spam text in the last 12 months I'm not immediately worried. UK law should prevent anyone phoning/texting me without my permission.

      (To anyone who thinks I should just delete my Facebook account: no, it's useful. I have many people who I met in various nightclubs on Facebook. They're not close friends I'd go out with, but we can see who's going to which clubs/gigs/festivals and meet up. I'm not going to text/email forty people twice a week to find this out the old way.)

    17. Re:Duh? by 0xDEAD · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not magically but legally different: http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2005/04/dnc.shtm. It is illegal to cold call mobile numbers and Facebook should be held liable for any crimes committed by the selling of this information.

    18. Re:Duh? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Phone numbers and home addresses are public knowledge already -- it's called a phone book.

      If you want to be ex-directory, then you wouldn't put this info on your Facebook profile in the first place.

      What other information is attached to your phone book entry, which is published regionally?
      What other information is attached to your FB network, which is published internationally?

      It's not the same thing bud.

    19. Re:Duh? by IronSight · · Score: 1

      I used to work for bellsouth/cingular now known as at&t wireless for the 411 service, and most people these days use cell phones only. Cell phones are not listed in the phone book or 411 directory. Personally though, I think that if you haven't quit facebook yet, you probably don't care who gets your personal info to begin with, this isn't the first we heard about our private information being sold. I deleted my profile when the new york times reported on this bullshit last year.

    20. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only are phone numbers and addresses more or less public knowledge, the Facebook API's are old ... my HTC populated my contacts book using facebook long ago ... not that I ever wanted them ...

    21. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a very nominal fee, some phone companies will not print the person' name/address/phone number in the printed or online phone directories. That means a person's information is actually private from the phone directories (but probably not from pay-for-information type of information broker sites like Intelius.)

      It just means in the case of Facebook, information marked "private" means, to be revealed later on, just not at the moment it's been entered. It only delays or postpones the revealing of that information for future Facebook update.

    22. Re:Duh? by twidarkling · · Score: 4, Informative

      On my new phone, I put in my facebook account for shits 'n giggles, and my phone imported my friends list and all their contact data. I now have a couple dozen phone numbers for people that I was never given directly by the owner. When that happened, I just kinda shook my head in wonder. Now with this story, I'm damn glad I've got absolutely minimal information on my facebook account.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    23. Re:Duh? by Relayman · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. I never entered any information not required in the first place. And I set up a separate e-mail address just for Facebook so I could track who was getting it. We Facebook users are not as stupid as we look.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    24. Re:Duh? by AnttiV · · Score: 1

      So? You think they are magically different?

      Maybe not magically, but legally / etc. At least here in Finland we used to get offers (usually via phone) to get our mobile numbers listed in the phonebook for Just This Nice Price(tm). Even now, you DON'T get listed if you don't opt-in (and I'm not sure if that's even free).

    25. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phone numbers and home addresses are public knowledge already

      Not anymore. I've had only cell and cable since I moved in '99. That stopped being unusual about halfway through last decade. Lots of people aren't in the phone book now.

    26. Re:Duh? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Phone numbers and home addresses are public knowledge already — it's called a phone book. If you want to be ex-directory, then you wouldn't put this info on your Facebook profile in the first place.

      Score:4 Insightful ???
      Never heard of unpublished and unlisted numbers, for the dinosaurs who still have landlines at home? They aren't expensive. And the mobile-only crowd don't even have to worry about that at all.
      Most people expect some level of privacy and professionalism from those companies and services whom they choose to trust, and they expect that the associated terms of service will not change drastically. Maybe it is a bit naive, but it seems like damn near everyone (not literally everyone - I've never signed up) has trusted Facebook.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    27. Re:Duh? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I have a great Yellowpages app on my Android phone that lets me type in partial names and hit phone numbers based on locality to where I'm standing. Its excellent for finding phone numbers while travelling.

      Sure, it doesn't list cell phone numbers, but I've always thought that rule was silly. Many people I know don't even have landlines any more. At any rate, no, Facebook isn't new and special in its privacy violating. Yawn.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    28. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure your phone didn't transmit its phone number to facebook?

    29. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anon because I already moderated.

      Here in Belgium, mobile numbers were by default considered private numbers, and listing was opt-in. This changed a few years ago, where listing became the default, opt-out value. I suspect many resellers still check the option for the customer without asking, though - a lot of even recent numbers are still not to be found.

    30. Re:Duh? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You were given them directly. They put them on their account, and accepted you as their friend. If their address was public then so be it. It's a phone number.

      I have my details also listed on my facebook, but it's friends only. It has helped several times, such as when one of my sister's friends needed help organising a surprise party, or when some of my friends in the past lost their phones / my number. You know what? It's a number which you can contact me on nothing more. I have no deep connection to this number and can change it whenever I want. I can also block people. My number is listed on facebook, in the whitepages phone directory, it's written on my business cards, it's written on my website. The phone and email is a means in which you can call me. I'll choose whether or not to answer.

      Hey give me a call sometime 0405264306. Australia has a prefix +61. I'd be happy to discuss with you why you are shaking your head that some people actually offer others a means to contact them. But note the time difference, my phone gets turned off at night so you may not get through.

    31. Re:Duh? by yorugua · · Score: 1

      I don't even have my real name on my FB account. :)

    32. Re:Duh? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      What does telemarketing has to do with phonebooks?

      Anyway, where I live telemarketing is illegal on both mobile and fixed phones, but I still dont see what that has to do with phonebooks. Mobile numbers are listed in the phonebooks of the carrier.

    33. Re:Duh? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I've had my mobile number on my Facebook profile for a couple of years now. I've never had a single call from anybody who could have conceivably bought my number from Facebook. Not a single one.

      Likewise my home address. I get a bit of snail mail spam, but it's all either hand delivered, addressed to 'The Occupier', or addressed to previous occupants of my flat.

      I don't see any issue here.

      Maybe it helps that I never, ever use apps on Facebook. I just use it for communicating with people that I know in real life.

    34. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait till your phone gets 'smart' and updates facebook with its number because it is being 'helpful'

    35. Re:Duh? by Homburg · · Score: 2

      The rules haven't changed. Your number and address are still private and shared only with people you authorize. The only difference is that the people you authorize can now include "developers of apps" as well as "friends."

    36. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not cold calling; you've got a pre-existing business relationship with them because you accepted one of their cookies. Welcome to the brave new world.

    37. Re:Duh? by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      Phone numbers and home addresses are public knowledge already — it's called a phone book.

      Last time I checked, the phone book wasn't linked with full names, photos and detailed personal information about when you're going on holidays ...

      Seriously, this must be a burglar's wet dream! Someone posts that they're off overseas with their partner for two months ... and you can see their home address ...!?

      Surely society has some sort of moral obligation to protect the terminally stupid from doing this?

    38. Re:Duh? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      This is not necessarily evidence to contrary. You often fail to find mobile number in the normal phonebook, but that is because the phonebook traditionally have been published by the local land-line provider, unless you have them as your mobile service provider they do not have your name and address. Your actual mobile service provider do have these informations, and in at least some countries they have a default right to publish this data unless you have specifically opted out. Not all carriers have phonebooks, but they could if they would, the data is considered public until you opt-out.

      Even in Denmark where I live, most people seem to think their mobile phone-numbers can not be looked up, just because it is not in the traditional physical phonebook, but I can find more than 70% of the numbers I search for, by just trying the online phonebooks of the four biggest providers one at a time. If I had a meta search-engine it would be even easier.

    39. Re:Duh? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      You weren't given the numbers directly, but they were effectively written on pieces of paper and left face up in a box that you have easy access to, should you wish to peek in and take a look. Your phone did that for you.

    40. Re:Duh? by Drathos · · Score: 1

      And yet my cell phone (for which I have only given the number to friends, family, and coworkers) gets 4 or 5 calls from robodialers every day. Different numbers every time, but the same 4 recordings (won a cruise, reduce my credit card debt, refinance my mortgage, or get health insurance for my family) are always used.

      I've filed dozens of FCC complaints, but the calls keep coming because there's nothing to identify the scammers and they're falsifying caller id.

      --
      End of line..
    41. Re:Duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have done this repeatedly. "We won't share email addresses with anyone you don't authorize"... lusers say 'oook!' and enter the info. Data cruncher says after 1 year, hey we got 80% of the email addy's from lusers. FB says "great! hey everyone, we are gonna sell your email addresses now!" You can replace 'email addresses' with just about any information they have pledged privacy, then 'changed their minds'. In some contexts, they could be seen as deceptive, offering sanctuary, then doing the ole 'bait and switch'.

    42. Re:Duh? by ChromeBallz · · Score: 1

      Mobile phones aren't listed. That, and the value of this information is that it links certain browsing behaviour (your facebook account) with a certain phone number and address. By itself the information is quite worthless, but it's the combination that makes it so valuable.

  4. Another option by Ariastis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Easier option :

    Account - Privacy Settings - Apps and Websites (Bottom) - Turn off platform apps

    Bye bye Farmville / Cafe World / Fortune cookie notifications.

    Bye bye info sharing with ueseless apps.

    I have yet to find anything I miss from that pile of junk.

    1. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you trust FB to honor your choice of options?

    2. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or: Account -> Close -> Regain real social life and privacy
       

    3. Re:Another option by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Easier option
      Easiest Option
      Don't use facebook.
      ???
      FTW!

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    4. Re:Another option by rudy_wayne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you trust FB to honor your choice of options?

      Which is the real problem.

      Facebook is no longer just a website run by a couple of college kids. It is a business - a big business - and like any business their number one priority is making as much money as possible. This is especially true now that Goldman-Sachs has invested $500 million and is trying to get others to invest another Billion or so. No matter how much lip service is given to "privacy" it is no accident that their privacy settings are hard to figure out, don't really do anything and completely deleting a profile is difficult, assuming that they actually delete anything at all. This is by deliberate design because Facebook's business model demands that they must be able to sell your personal information to advertisers.

    5. Re:Another option by fishexe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And you trust FB to honor your choice of options?

      Which is the real problem.

      Facebook is no longer just a website run by a couple of college kids. It is a business - a big business - and like any business their number one priority is making as much money as possible.

      Sadly, this is one big business that was probably creepier when it was just a website run by a couple of college kids, one of whom once said about people's Facebook data, 'People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.' At least now he has investors to sometimes keep him in check, a little bit, maybe.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    6. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier option :

      Account - Privacy Settings - Apps and Websites (Bottom) - Turn off platform apps

      Bye bye Farmville / Cafe World / Fortune cookie notifications.

      Bye bye info sharing with ueseless apps.

      I have yet to find anything I miss from that pile of junk.

      Easier still:

      Account - Account Settings - Deactivate Account - Confirm.

    7. Re:Another option by syousef · · Score: 2

      Sadly, this is one big business that was probably creepier when it was just a website run by a couple of college kids, one of whom once said about people's Facebook data, 'People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.' At least now he has investors to sometimes keep him in check, a little bit, maybe.

      I'd argue this story is proof that his investors aren't keeping him in check. I don't doubt the fact that he's suppose to be worth billions has done nothing in his own mind but vindicate him and boost his already inflated ego.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:Another option by icebike · · Score: 1

      The investors probably hold such a minuscule portion that FB can continue doing what they want.

      It will take a couple major stalking cases and a congressional investigation before any of this changes.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    9. Re:Another option by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this is one big business that was probably creepier when it was just a website run by a couple of college kids, one of whom once said about people's Facebook data, 'People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.' At least now he has investors to sometimes keep him in check, a little bit, maybe.

      I'd argue this story is proof that his investors aren't keeping him in check. I don't doubt the fact that he's suppose to be worth billions has done nothing in his own mind but vindicate him and boost his already inflated ego.

      Yeah, but he knows he's only worth billions on paper and that could all vanish in an instant the moment the investors get unhappy with him. And honestly, having stuff that you've already posted for "friends" to see be available to apps when you click "authorize" isn't nearly as creepy as having the stuff that no human was ever supposed to see (like your password) potentially being made available by the people running the site to whoever they want to give it to, on a whim. But yeah, you're right, the difference in Zuck's behavior is probably slim if any.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    10. Re:Another option by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      I have yet to find anything I miss from that pile of junk.

      I turned off mine for a while--the only thing I missed was the ability to access Facebook streams, and chat, through other applications, such as TweetDeck. I've conscientiously avoided most FB games and all of the cruft apps (quizzes, *ville, etc). But, in the end, I'd turned it back on for those couple things. It may go off again soon.

    11. Re:Another option by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sadly, this is one big business that was probably creepier when it was just a website run by a couple of college kids, one of whom once said about people's Facebook data, 'People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.' At least now he has investors to sometimes keep him in check, a little bit, maybe.

      I'd argue this story is proof that his investors aren't keeping him in check. I don't doubt the fact that he's suppose to be worth billions has done nothing in his own mind but vindicate him and boost his already inflated ego.

      Yeah, but he knows he's only worth billions on paper and that could all vanish in an instant the moment the investors get unhappy with him. And honestly, having stuff that you've already posted for "friends" to see be available to apps when you click "authorize" isn't nearly as creepy as having the stuff that no human was ever supposed to see (like your password) potentially being made available by the people running the site to whoever they want to give it to, on a whim. But yeah, you're right, the difference in Zuck's behavior is probably slim if any.

      I don't think he "KNOWS" any such thing. I think his ego is probably way out of control. He probably understands that there's been some luck involved but I doubt he feels anything but a sense of entitlement. His entire world might one day fall apart but if he's got any brains he's been moving some of that on paper money into real assets for a rainy day. (He may not have any brains though - often people who have that level of confidence in themselves don't see the end coming...all depends on how paranoid and how in touch with reality he is)

      As for apps having access...it doesn't get much creepier than broadcasting where you live and your phonenumber to all and sundry. A password, providing you don't reuse it is not nearly as big a security threat as your physical location. Even if you do reuse your password, so long as it's not shared with other important accounts (like banking etc). it's not as big a deal as your whereabouts.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    12. Re:Another option by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      This quote is from five years ago. At the time, I doubt his investors had even heard of him. So it says nothing about his investors, but it does say something about his character.

    13. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No congressional investigation since Goldman Sachs is the puppetmaster.

    14. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least now he has investors to sometimes keep him in check, a little bit, maybe.

      Exactly. Investors are always putting societal welfare ahead of their own private fortunes.

    15. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he hadn't said it, it would be no less true.

    16. Re:Another option by Xemu · · Score: 1

      Facebook is no longer just a website run by a couple of college kids. It is a business - a big business - and like any business their number one priority is making as much money as possible. This is especially true now that Goldman-Sachs has invested $500 million and is trying to get others to invest another Billion or so.

      Ah, this explains the nigeria "419" spam SMS text message I got this morning. I didn't understand how the spammers got my number, but now I understand it was Goldman-Sachs that got it through the new Facebook API. I didn't know Goldman-Sachs had an african uncle though.

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    17. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like they now have professionals with an interest in mining and selling the information, and sadly it is less creepy...
      As for the investors, all they're going to care about is the money and that FaceBook keeps the scandals down.
      Also http://xkcd.com/743/

    18. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had APPS turned off on mine, yet was surprised when someone that was a FRIEND of a friend managed to somehow include me in some zodiac picture. My birthdate was hidden, and I had all apps turned off. Yet it still managed to 'see' my birthdate? I think the datamining goes deep and wide with these sites.

      --
      Ex-Facebook user
      Just Say No to Social Networking

    19. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This quote is from five years ago. At the time, I doubt his investors had even heard of him. So it says nothing about his investors, but it does say something about his character.

      Reading comprehension is useful. GP suggested that now that there are investors in this company it has given him a reason not to make such blatant statements, for the obvious reason that he may lose said investors if he continues to make such blatant statements.

      In other words, an external restraint is likely the only reason we don't still hear such comments from him. Prior to the presence of such external restraints, we saw something more like what he really thinks. That isn't a commentary about investors. It's a commentary about how one of the Facebook founders acts when there are no investors to impress. It is very much a statement about his character.

      More reading comprehension leads to less of an urge to point out the obvious. It especially leads to less of an urge to point out the obvious using a tone as though you were correcting an error. You weren't.

    20. Re:Another option by dbIII · · Score: 1

      'People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.'

      I entirely agree and I'm the sort of person they could trust. I think all we can get out of this is that he was astonished by the private information that was being placed in his care.
      We've already seen people get fired or not get employed based on what they have on their facebook profiles. Let's face it, they are dumb fucks because the laziest people in HR are very happy to spend the entire day mucking about on facebook and making employment choices based on wall posts.

    21. Re:Another option by Snaller · · Score: 2

      "And you trust FB to honor your choice of options?"

      The moment its proven that they don't, the EU would fine Facebooks so bad they could only afford to run NosePad

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    22. Re:Another option by nametaken · · Score: 1

      They may be selling information out-of-band to someone, but generally this information is not available to facebook advertisers. You can target groups of people based on some criteria.

      As far as 3rd party co's accessing your info when authorized, this stuff is not secret and is worth keeping an eye on. As many have said before me, it is not in FB's interest to notify all their users when there's a change in what devs can and can't access.

      http://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/446

    23. Re:Another option by jojoba_oil · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to mention that as much time as you spend on the main privacy page disallowing everything, there is still the little button hidden on the "apps privacy" page (which you navigate to by a small link at the bottom of the main privacy selection page) that says "Click to edit the data that apps your friends use are allowed to see." So if you disable everything on the main page, app developers still have a way of mining all your information, because it's all on by default.

    24. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His Russian investor's money comes from Russian organized crime, so don't gamble on Facebook's investors keeping FB's privacy invasion or data sales in check.

    25. Re:Another option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://suicidemachine.org

    26. Re:Another option by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      If you do want to use apps you can always just set up a completely fake account.

      I did that to play scrabble with some friends. My profile has not an ounce of genuine information in it, it's all completely fake using a throw-away email address ... and I still felt like I was being sodomised by facebook when I signed up!

    27. Re:Another option by harrier · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced it was ever just a website run by a couple of college kids. Because I do respect the privacy of the person who told me this, I can't give enough details to make it solid; however, a very trustworthy person in a trustworthy position worked with Mark in the early days. When they voiced concern for the privacy of users, Mark replied that he would protect the privacy of the third parties. He, in no uncertain terms, said that user information/farming is where money is made. This was his intent all along. Eep.

    28. Re:Another option by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Apps can see anything the user invoking them sees - even friends. If your friends can see these details, so can an app running as them. Even if the app would see less when running as you.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  5. This is a seriously bad idea! by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Giving any App developer access to peoples contact details is just an insane move if FB is meant to be making things more secure for their users.

    Having someone's address and phone number makes identity theft so much easier.

    1. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Not to mention:

      "I'm on a holiday to the North Pole!"
      *click*
      Lives at : "My House". 3.142 Street, Homeville.

    2. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      It seem not jut your information, but also you friends.

      I noticed this for some apps:

      Access my friends' information
      Birthdays, Religious and political views, Family members and relationship statuses, Significant others and relationship details, Home towns, Current locations, Likes, music, TV, movies, books, quotes, Activities, Interests, Education history, Work history, Online presence, Websites, Groups, Events, Notes, Photos, Videos, Photos and videos of them, 'About me' details and Facebook statuses

      Why on earth would Facebook want to give this information to third parties, and worse to ones you have not given permission to, but your friend has.

    3. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Chucky_M · · Score: 1

      It seem not jut your information, but also you friends.

      I noticed this for some apps:

      Access my friends' information Birthdays, Religious and political views, Family members and relationship statuses, Significant others and relationship details, Home towns, Current locations, Likes, music, TV, movies, books, quotes, Activities, Interests, Education history, Work history, Online presence, Websites, Groups, Events, Notes, Photos, Videos, Photos and videos of them, 'About me' details and Facebook statuses

      Why on earth would Facebook want to give this information to third parties, and worse to ones you have not given permission to, but your friend has.

      Because you cannot sell what nobody want's to buy, information is what they can sell, the real question is why do people want to buy this information.

    4. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 5, Informative

      It really is a gold mine for identity theft in the wrong hands.

      Most phone support for companies only need Phone number, address and DOB for an identity confirmation and all it takes is for someone to get access to someone's credit card account for them to be able to completely steal their identity for dodgy bankloans or being able to get drivers licenses/passports.

    5. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory

      I grew up when phone numbers were public information. Everybody had a book where you could look up the phone number and address of anyone in the area. A few people were unlisted at their own request, but this was the exception.

      Phone numbers and addresses were treated as public knowledge.

      When cell phones first arrived, receiving calls cost money, so cell phone numbers were kept private. Now that the cost of incoming calls is much, much lower, there's little need to keep treating these things as private, especially with people replacing land lines with cell phones.

      The problem lies not with facebook making this data available; the problem lies with everyone who pretends this is secret information to begin with. Some companies consider your phone number to be a unique identifier. Other (idiotic) companies treat it as an authenticator...something nobody else knows. Mix those two and BAD SHIT HAPPENS.

      SSNs are treated the same way. Some places use them for identification and others use them as a freaking password. Frequently an individual bank or credit provider will be using a SSN as both a username and password simultaneously. THAT is the heart of the problem.

      Would knowing the address for the White House help you steal Obama's identity. No, because everybody knows that is public knowledge. The problem is the people who think "wow, this guy knows his own address, so he obviously must be who he claims to be, because nobody else would know that"

    6. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      A phone book is a local directory of information. Sitting in Chicago, I could not look up the phone number and/or address of someone who lives in New York, unless I had access to a New York phone book.

      Being on the Internet, Facebook transcends such obsolete things as state or national borders. You can see the phone number and/or address of anyone, anywhere in the world, so long as they've listed it. There's the difference, and the danger.

    7. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seem not jut your information, but also you friends.

      I noticed this for some apps:

      Access my friends' information
      Birthdays, Religious and political views, Family members and relationship statuses, Significant others and relationship details, Home towns, Current locations, Likes, music, TV, movies, books, quotes, Activities, Interests, Education history, Work history, Online presence, Websites, Groups, Events, Notes, Photos, Videos, Photos and videos of them, 'About me' details and Facebook statuses

      Why on earth would Facebook want to give this information to third parties, and worse to ones you have not given permission to, but your friend has.

      You can turn off sharing all information via your friends - there are a number of checkboxes that you have to uncheck. It will only share what you have checked, if your friend adds an app that has the "Access my friends' info" requirement.

    8. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live, the phonebook is country-wide. However, if you try to look up the phonenumber of private individuals, more and more often you're in for a little disappointment. People can specify whether they want to be listed or not, and since the government didn't manage to clamp down on telephone marketing, the telcos have started making unlisted the default option.

    9. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Except with this phone number and address now comes, how often I talk to friends, what my status is, what books, movies and television I like, etc, etc, etc.

      What the f***, do you work for facebook, or are you just the volunteer who makes the kool-aid?

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    10. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      A phone book just has a phone number and an address. Facebook has far more information on far more people than found in any given phone book. To add to this, children and teens normally aren't in a phone book but are in Facebook. For FB to give devs access to this all in a very tidy bundle with hardly any work is pretty scary. You just need to make a trojan and anyone that accepts it not only compromises their own information, also gives away information of everyone they're "friends" with.

    11. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I cheeked and I have them all deselected.

    12. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

      I grew up when phone numbers were public information. Everybody had a book where you could look up the phone number and address of anyone in the area. A few people were unlisted at their own request, but this was the exception.

      Two things:
      1. There is more on your Facebook account than just a phone number and home address
      2. Most people I know list their cell phone number on Facebook. This is not public and can't be looked up in a directory.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    13. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where on earth do you live! I've never had to pay for an incoming call on my cell, ever!

    14. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A phone book is a local directory of information. Sitting in Chicago, I could not look up the phone number and/or address of someone who lives in New York, unless I had access to a New York phone book, or went to the local public library, or called Directory Assistance.

      TFTFY.

    15. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by hedwards · · Score: 1

      3.142 Street, Homeville is my address you insensitive clod.

    16. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by funkylovemonkey · · Score: 1

      Back then most public libraries kept copies of phone books from around the U.S. Phone numbers and addresses are information that has always been freely available, it's only more convenient online, not necessarily less secure.

    17. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only area you have fine control over as far as apps goes: which data friends' apps can access. Privacy -> Apps, game and websites -> Information accessible through your friends

      It doesn't go the other way though; you can't stop apps from accessing this information from your friends, assuming they don't have their privacy options locked down. Hence you need to read the app disclaimers before allowing them access, or just don't let in any of them.

    18. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Now that the cost of incoming calls is much, much lower, there's little need to keep treating these things as private

      You really think that the person paying the bill doesn't have a right to keep the number private? The only reason for land-line directories was to generate accounts with telemarketers and to extort customers into paying every month for a "private number". The privacy issue is with controlling communications so that you aren't constantly harassed, not with numbers and addresses falsely being used for authentication (which I've never seen).

    19. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      When cell phones first arrived, receiving calls cost money

      Er, receiving? Which phone company dared to pull that? That's the most broken idea related to phones I've heard in a while.
      Do you mean that people who accepted such shitty plans had to pay whenever some chatty person or a telemarketer called them -- without having any control on how much they get called?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    20. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, receiving? Which phone company dared to pull that?

      That has always been the practice for cell phones in the United States. On the one hand, it sucked. But on the other hand, it did prompt laws which prohibited telemarketers from calling cell phones.

      I don't know if it's still true, but for a long time, if a telemarketer called, you could tell them that they had called a cell phone, and they would hang up like the phone was radioactive.

    21. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time I checked, Facebook wasn't a public trust of any sort. So, when people submit their information onto the site, they do so with the knowledge (albeit, very limited knowledge) that their information is private and not available for everyone. If they wish to do this sort of action they should at least notify the users of the site that this action will happen. By prominently displaying this on the users home page and giving them a choice to decline or make their information public. But since Facebook is free and really has absolutely NO value except as a huge marketing engine, I just don't see this happening anytime soon

    22. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Ok, so there is more information on Facebook. So, explain what evil thing someone is going to do with that information? I hear everyone shouting "PRIVACY!" about people that chose to put shit on the Internet. They obviously don't want to live like the Unibomber and want some of their information to be semi-public. So, what *exactly* are we afraid will happen when people know my phone number and home address?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    23. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Paco103 · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Phonebook.com? Anyone?

      Not to mention, libraries or directory assistance as listed below.

      Also, lets think about this. . . . are we seriously suggesting that it's not a big deal if the guy on the other side of town (or on the other side of a city the size of Chicago or New York) is NOT a problem when I post that I'm out of town, but the guy on the other side of the COUNTRY is? C'mon - Nobody in NY is going to hop on a plane to go rob a guy in Chicago that posts that he's out of town for New Years and he just got a nice home theater for Christmas. That guy on the other side of town very well might rent a U-Haul though.

      The information is already public (though I don't like them sharing it, I've never though the security options were that freaking difficult). The problem is a lot less to do with facebook and a lot more to do with users that post every tiny detail in their lives, don't bother even TRYING to understand the security options, and friend every single person they've ever met or that has a "hot" profile pic. Used to be that thieves had to observe the news papers and mail piling up to figure out you're gone. Now, they just sit back and watch the news feed. I'll admit, I've posted when I'm out of town, but I also don't friend everybody I've ever met and use the privacy options.

    24. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I use a pay-as-you-go phone. Texts cost me $0.20, and calls $0.10/min, the first call of the day is $1. I don't want anyone other than the people I've given my number to have that number.

      I have a preferred method of contact for all the important people and businesses in my life. Those companies that go outside that get the cold shoulder from me. One of my credit card companies isn't going to see any more business from me because they decided one day that it would be a good idea to start calling my cell every few hours. All our contact previous has been by mail or email. If they can't respect that, fuck them. (They got the number as an emergency number while I was traveling. To decide that they can try to call it to sell me shit using it is not cool.)

      Yes, once there were telephone directories, where everyone was listed. That worked great when calls cost a fair bit of money, and marketers hadn't started cold calling everyone in that book. Now, we're inundated by marketing. I'm not so worried about identity theft - it's the intrusive marketing that I'm 100% against. The fact that I can't tell the post office to fuck off makes me consider moving all the bills I can onlne, and just not ever opening my mail box. They'll stop jamming shit into it when it gets full.

      All this ties back to Facebook - we're running short of new ways to reach people for marketing. Facebook is providing that new avenue. There's a reason they don't have a date of birth, address, phone number, full name, likes/dislikes/organizations/networks/religions/politics/etc on me. It was pretty damn clear to me that when I signed up, it was just a matter of time before it became another avenue for marketing. Unlike the postal service, I can at least stop going there if it gets bad.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    25. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by causality · · Score: 1

      It seem not jut your information, but also you friends.

      I noticed this for some apps:

      Access my friends' information Birthdays, Religious and political views, Family members and relationship statuses, Significant others and relationship details, Home towns, Current locations, Likes, music, TV, movies, books, quotes, Activities, Interests, Education history, Work history, Online presence, Websites, Groups, Events, Notes, Photos, Videos, Photos and videos of them, 'About me' details and Facebook statuses

      Why on earth would Facebook want to give this information to third parties, and worse to ones you have not given permission to, but your friend has.

      Because you cannot sell what nobody want's to buy, information is what they can sell, the real question is why do people want to buy this information.

      Because producing a truly useful product/service that people really want is not part of their business model.

      No, they are marketers. Their goal is to get you to spend money in order to solve problems you didn't even know you had. For that, they need to know a lot about you. They especially need to know your tastes and preferences. They also like to know whether you are impulsive, whether you live beyond your means, whether you have irrationally strong emotions for particular subjects that can be manipulated to get you to identify with a brand, or have any other exploitable character flaws I've not listed here.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    26. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I thought the same. I've never known anyone to have to ever pay to receive a call.

    27. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_directory

      I grew up when phone numbers were public information. Everybody had a book where you could look up the phone number and address of anyone in the area. A few people were unlisted at their own request, but this was the exception.

      Phone numbers and addresses were treated as public knowledge.

      When cell phones first arrived, receiving calls cost money, so cell phone numbers were kept private. Now that the cost of incoming calls is much, much lower, there's little need to keep treating these things as private, especially with people replacing land lines with cell phones.

      The problem lies not with facebook making this data available; the problem lies with everyone who pretends this is secret information to begin with. Some companies consider your phone number to be a unique identifier. Other (idiotic) companies treat it as an authenticator...something nobody else knows. Mix those two and BAD SHIT HAPPENS.

      SSNs are treated the same way. Some places use them for identification and others use them as a freaking password. Frequently an individual bank or credit provider will be using a SSN as both a username and password simultaneously. THAT is the heart of the problem.

      Would knowing the address for the White House help you steal Obama's identity. No, because everybody knows that is public knowledge. The problem is the people who think "wow, this guy knows his own address, so he obviously must be who he claims to be, because nobody else would know that"

      The problem is not that it's public, but that it's connected to all the other information. Name/Address/Phone is not particularly useful. Name/Education/"Likes" is not particularly useful. Name/Address/Phone/Education/Likes/etc, etc. all relationally linked...that starts to be useful.

    28. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Ok, so there is more information on Facebook. So, explain what evil thing someone is going to do with that information?

      I was going to reply with some examples of things that could go wrong.
      But I won't.

      You've framed the question in a way that precludes the most obvious rebuttal:
      Why can't my information be more private instead of less?

      The burden shouldn't be upon me to defend why I want more privacy,
      it should be upon you to explain why I should have less.
      I await your response.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    29. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Why can't my information be more private instead of less?

      Here is a hint: don't share your secrets with anyone you can't trust.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    30. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by HJED · · Score: 1

      Many apps are badly written and you can stop them accessing permissions they shouldn't need by editing the url of the permissions request. (nb. some apps use ajax so you can't easily edit the url of the permissions request page, others actually check and redirect you back to the permissions page).
      E.g adding the app 'crazy taxi' it requests permission to post on my wall, I can stop it from getting that permission by deleting '&perms=publish_stream' from the url. Going to the new url it is now only asking for permission to access basic information, I press alow and it lets me continue.

      --
      null
    31. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by alleycat0 · · Score: 1
      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    32. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Tom · · Score: 1

      No, the real point is:

      As long as someone else can share this information about you, your own so-called "privacy settings" are nothing of that sort. And I don't think it's an accident that there is no setting to control what others can share about you. So we're back at the web-of-trust thing where you'd really need two settings, one saying "I know that person" and one saying "I trust that person to be truthful about her friends". And you're not given that 2nd option.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    33. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up when phone numbers were public information. Everybody had a book where you could look up the phone number and address of anyone in the area. A few people were unlisted at their own request, but this was the exception.

      Two things:
      1. There is more on your Facebook account than just a phone number and home address
      2. Most people I know list their cell phone number on Facebook. This is not public and can't be looked up in a directory.

      Two things:

      1. Phone books give First and Last name, street address, and phone number. What kind of use is a phonebook that doesn't have any fucking names?
      2. My phone number is 555-321-1234 go ahead and sell it to a list. I live at 1600 Pennsylvania in Washington, D.C. and plan on being out of town for a couple months, feel free to stop by and rob me if you really think you can get away with it.

    34. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they are marketers. Their goal is to get you to spend money in order to solve problems you didn't even know you had.

      Them and the lawyers... I wish I can imagine a way to put them on the collision course without giving up the "just a spectator" status.

    35. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Er, receiving? Which phone company dared to pull that?

      Americans do this. They even pay to receive SMS. Incredible, but true.

    36. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Er, receiving? Which phone company dared to pull that?

      Every american phone company apparently do this. Americans even pay to receive SMS. Incredible, but true.

    37. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in sweden a lot of people's mobile phone numbers are listed in the phone book, mine included.

    38. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      I was going to reply with some examples of things that could go wrong.
      But I won't.

      Because *that* wouldn't add to the discussion, would it?

      Why can't my information be more private instead of less?

      If I put MY information into a website that I do not pay for, I am the product, not the customer. That simple fact should be enough to clue you in that I should not expect privacy with any of the information that I put up there. If that didn't do it, perhaps the lack of full SSL on the site might indicate that I'm putting information in CLEAR TEXT on the fucking Internet. That would not be something I would do with information that is private.

      I do put information on Facebook. I put the same information I used to put on my on personal website, but got to lazy to maintain it and my friends would rarely visit it. Facebook runs my website for me with MORE security than I had before. There is no way they could make Facebook LESS secure than a personal website open to the world.

      So, now that I've feed the troll, can you answer my question? Pretty please, with sugar on top. You and so many people are out to protect my mortal soul from some evil that comes with "the Internet" having this information, so please, enlighten me.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    39. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      No, the real point is:

      As long as someone else can share this information about you, your own so-called "privacy settings" are nothing of that sort.

      Actually, that's not true (assuming you trust fb to honour the settings you select!) If you look under Settings --> Privacy --> Apps and Websites, you can control what information friends' apps can see about you. Essentially, fb is relying on insecurity-through-obscurity -- they can't be criticised for not giving users the option to prevent such abuse, but these options are hidden away in places they hope nobody will ever look.

      But the best solution is to use a fake name and fake personal information when setting up your profile. Your friends will still know it's you, and anyone who isn't a friend doesn't matter anyway ...

      Plus it means your highschool "friends" who you lost contact with for a reason can't look you up .... :)

    40. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by cheetah_spottycat · · Score: 1

      The problem is not that name and phonenumber have suddenly become secret information. It's all the other information they are linked with. The phone book only lists your name and your number. It does not know anything about your marital status, your religion, your friends or which brand of condoms you prefer. Facebook does.

    41. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I check, the phone book didn't have a profile picture, family details and people you know either.

    42. Re:This is a seriously bad idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While attending college our Social Security Number was given as our username for our Account Maintenance WebApp. Exchange Server and AD Domain were a combination of name and Social. Sorry, just my two cents with a double fail.

  6. why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about you remove all of your posts, pictures and delete your account immediately?
    If this doesn't wake people up, absolutely nothing will.

    1. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why is this modded funny?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why stop there? Why leave your house in the first place? If you go outside, you're just -asking- for your organs to get sold on the black market. And having a computer is just begging someone to steal your identity and infect you with computer viruses.

      Alright, that's a hyperbole, but my point is that a lot of people actually like facebook. Deleting information like your home address and phone number is an easy step, and then they'll still be able to use it.

    3. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Chucky_M · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why is this modded funny?

      Because you are asking addicts to give up their crack and expecting them to say "oh ok sorry about that".

    4. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Facebook account, but I gave it no address, phone number, posts or pictures. If you give it absolutely nothing other than your list of friends (unavoidable) and set all privacy options to 'hidden' or 'closed' or whatever (including disabling applications) it's still a nice way to send private messages to old classmates.

    5. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe the moderator considered it funny that someone thinks if he removes all his data from Facebook, it is no longer stored there?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reduction to the absurd is itself absurd. By shooting any woman who gets pregnant of course we can eliminate all of society's problems, including facebook "privacy", within 100 years. But exactly how useful is that as an argument?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about you remove all of your posts, pictures and delete your account immediately?.

      You're assuming that closing your account actually deletes all your information and Facebook no longer sells it to advertisers. This is not necessarily a valid assumption.

    8. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by jaf0 · · Score: 2

      keep in mind that accounts aren't deleted immediately; rather they're in limbo for 3-4 weeks and will then (supposedly) go to /dev/null.

    9. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by sakura+the+mc · · Score: 1

      perhaps, but at least it wont be aggregated all over the internet anymore.

    10. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that closing your account actually deletes all your information and Facebook no longer sells it to advertisers. This is not necessarily a valid assumption.

      I closed mine, and they're quite welcome to sell my profile information to any marketers interested in "102-year-old" "lesbians" in "Burkina Faso".

    11. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i closed my account two or three years ago, i have a somewhat unique name. Last month i tried to open a new account, but facebook refuses to create a new account with my name, so i'm pretty sure that they didn't delete any of my data.

    12. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      I accidentally logged on again onto one of my accounts that I had permanently closed a few weeks earlier. Facebook was elated that I had returned, and immediately reactivated the account.

      I've never set up a Facebook account with any real information, aside, I guess, from my IP address, though.

    13. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      By shooting any woman who gets pregnant of course we can eliminate all of society's problems

      Including murder and low birth rate?

    14. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Because Facebook still provides a useful service with no real competitor.

      I expect people to start leaving, once there is a viable alternative. But I don't expect people to give up the service.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    15. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said it was absurd, are you an idiot, or a ass?

    16. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Because Facebook still provides a useful service with no real competitor.

      I propose that non-use is a competitor.

      I choose non-use over use of FB. simply not necessary at all for anyone. its like soda, it really performs NO useful function but somehow they convince people they 'need' to have soda with their meal instead of just water, for example.

      FB is important only to those so self-involved. its almost 'cute' in a way, that those users think the world really revolves around them.

      those of us who never joined see how silly the whole give-away concept is.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    17. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that closing your account actually deletes all your information and Facebook no longer sells it to advertisers. This is not necessarily a valid assumption.

      Not a valid assumption at all. Anyone notice the new "status memories" thing? It's throwing things at me that I deleted off my wall in 2009, basically flaunting their disdain for their own privacy policies (90 days before deleted stuff disappears from server). I'm at a point now where I don't bother to delete my account, I know they'll keep my stuff.
      http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/f1xr6/facebooks_new_memories_feature_is_flaunting_their/

    18. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      murder would be solved within about 100 years, as he suggests. low birth rate.. not so much.

    19. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      keep in mind that accounts aren't deleted immediately; rather they're in limbo for 3-4 weeks and will then (supposedly) go to /dev/null.

      And the backup tapes?

    20. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by causality · · Score: 2

      Because Facebook still provides a useful service with no real competitor.

      I propose that non-use is a competitor.

      I choose non-use over use of FB. simply not necessary at all for anyone. its like soda, it really performs NO useful function but somehow they convince people they 'need' to have soda with their meal instead of just water, for example.

      FB is important only to those so self-involved. its almost 'cute' in a way, that those users think the world really revolves around them.

      those of us who never joined see how silly the whole give-away concept is.

      Those of us who never joined quickly see another thing too: the futility of trying to explain that to anyone who doesn't already understand it.

      I suppose addicts of hard drugs have more denials and rationalizations than the merely egotistical and self-indulgent, but not by much.

      The mentality can be summarized thusly: "but but but, it performs some trivial and transient convenience that's not really necessary -- clearly that outweighs every principled objection!" Sometimes there are shades of "you're a big meanie for finding fault with my new Shiny!"

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    21. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by froggymana · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Thats why I like being safe in my mom's basement playing D&D... Although I sometimes get cut by the pewter figurines and the d 20s....

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    22. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded funny? (Score: 4, Funny)

      Holy self-fulfilling prophecy, Batman!

    23. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in fact it's a wrong assumption. You'd have to change all your data, keep using fcebook for a while so the changes "stick" (your name takes time to get accepted) and then, deactivate your account (yeah deactivate, there is no way to delete, see the south park episode when stan tries to leave facebook... he gets sucked in a virtual world like the movie Tron and has to fight the mcp - hilarious, watch it). Even if you do that, the way things work there, they'd probably keep record of the original data and use it as more plausible than modified data (definitely if you remove data instead of modifying it). So you're good only if you never gave them any data actually. From day 1 I gave them a false name and no data whatsoever. I'm in facebook just to see what my friends say and upload. When fb changes privacy stuff without notice, it's a bit annoying because i have to look at my settings and wonder about the implications, but actually it's no problem in the end because there is no personal data there anyway so they can fuck with me all they want, they can publish my non-existent data as they please :)

      On the other hand, about ethics, people are willing to step into all sorts of scams and dangerous shit, they will do it regardless. So how much is Facebook to blame for letting them be themselves (retarded dumbasses)? it's not like they put a gun to your head you know... (ok fb is to blame for changing privacy settings and so on without notice but i'm talking now just about making fb and monetizing it this way-selling user info). Who is to blame? the retard who's obviously giving away his privacy to a greedy corp or the corp who lets the retard get what he's craving for? I mean, people are still there in fb and will REMAIN there even after reading stuff like this post. They think it's a good deal for them, so how much can we blame fb for giving people what they, after all, think is a good deal?? i don't have the answer.

    24. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by drfireman · · Score: 1

      That's just stupid. Some people find fb useful and know how to use it safely. Frankly, anyone who falls victim to this is just a complete idiot. So yes, complete idiots should delete their accounts immediately (aso their email accounts and their phone accounts, and they should remove doors from their houses). Everyone else has nothing to worry about. I don't know why this is even news. Most people, like me, probably assumed that apps could request whatever they wanted. Apps could already just ask you for your phone number if they really wanted it.

    25. Re:why stop at addresses and phone numbers? by ashidosan · · Score: 1

      After around 100 years like this, neither of those things will continue to be a problem.

  7. Never had them there in the first place by coolmadsi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I never put information that detailed up there in the first place. Partially for this sort of reason, but also partially because not everyone on my friends list needs to know all of it (or would care if it was there). Anyone who would want to know, already does.

    1. Re:Never had them there in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Like

  8. Sophos: "New level of danger for Facebook users" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Share this Article on Facebook.
    Comment by signing in with your Facebook Account.
    Like us on Facebook.

  9. Closing the barn door too late by mauriceh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quote:
    "advises users to remove their home address and phone numbers from the network immediately"

    I think it may a bit too late for that..
    If FB will share that data, then I suspect they will share their backup data as well..

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
    1. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC in the UK (I'm not sure where the servers are based) but I'm sure you have to have a security clearence of secret+ to host this level of information?

    2. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if they need to confirm to the uk data protection laws... you have to keep your information accurate & not longer than required, and not share when you don't have permission... that would break all 3 of those.... but then it's been a while since I studied anything about that.. might be wrong.. but I don't think I am.

    3. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A $50 billion company isn't going to worry much about some slap-on-the-wrist "data protection law" in some other country.

    4. Re:Closing the barn door too late by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      This is one of the main arguments to Facebook being over valued. Data from European Union users is worthless — You can't do anything with it.

      Data protection laws go beyond the UK, and are used in the EU too.

    5. Re:Closing the barn door too late by antdude · · Score: 1

      And changing them won't help much either. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Cwix · · Score: 1

      You honestly think facebook isnt gonna sell that info?

      I highly doubt they give a fuck about your privacy protections.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    7. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you comment to the entirely wrong article or something?

    8. Re:Closing the barn door too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Not only is this information unavailable simply by designating it unavailable, if you remove it, you can't be retrieved through the api.

      This stuff is not secret, folks. You're all literate, you can go check the docs and see what's there.

    9. Re:Closing the barn door too late by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      But we still have some EU governments who might prosecute them because they aren't in the pockets of big business. Sorry US, but yours is.

    10. Re:Closing the barn door too late by TuomasK · · Score: 1

      The correct way is to change it to something bogus.

      --
      The truth or interpretation..
  10. Who didn't see this one coming? by waddgodd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, really, did anybody actually expect facebook to not sell your information to the highest bidder? If you put up real information, expect it to be used. The solution: LIE like a rug! Tell them your home address is 1060 W Addison, Chicago, IL (yeah, that one's kinda lame, copying SNL is good only for laughs). Tell them your phone number is 555-1212. Whatever, be creative.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
    1. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suspect that even poisoning the database with garbage data won't stop the demand for said data because the marketing people who buy it are far to lazy to actually CHECK said data; and so long as a reasonable percentage of the data is legitimate and they make their numbers, who cares? The cost of buying the data is insignificant when compared to other costs.

      Sad but true.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Cwix · · Score: 1

      I thought 1060 West Addison was what the blues brothers put down as their address. It's Wrigly field if I'm not mistaken.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    3. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, really, did anybody actually expect facebook to not sell your information to the highest bidder? If you put up real information, expect it to be used. The solution: LIE like a rug! Tell them your home address is 1060 W Addison, Chicago, IL (yeah, that one's kinda lame, copying SNL is good only for laughs). Tell them your phone number is 555-1212. Whatever, be creative.

      Better yet, set your address and phone # to those of FB headquarters. Let their mailroom and switchboard deal with the spam.

    4. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      And the hundred-dollar question: From what popular comedy show did the Blues Brothers originate?

    5. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what Facebook's own street address and phone number are. I might put those in.

    6. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Cwix · · Score: 1

      That was before my time, never saw Saturday Night Live till the 80s.

      I am gonna guess I made an ass out of myself though.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    7. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by meerling · · Score: 1

      I say you put in Mark Zuckerbergs home address and phone number, and see how that goes. :)
      He might just change his mind when he starts getting a million ad calls and junk mail per day.

      I'm still leaving mine blank though.

    8. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by garyok · · Score: 1

      So poison it with something that will cause regulators a headache. In the UK set your address and telephone number to the contact information for the Information Commissioner's Office

      Wycliffe House
      Water Lane
      Wilmslow
      Cheshire SK9 5AF

      +44 303 123 1113

      I imagine after a couple of thousand automated calls from off-shore call centers they may get round to tightening up those regulations.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    9. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, really, did anybody actually expect facebook to not sell your information to the highest bidder?

      Why only to the highest bidder?

    10. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Nah, governments being what they are, they would just hire more staff to answer the phone.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    11. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people are creative enough, we will still have our phone numbers tagged to some random data point.

      Be prepared to receive calls for Mr. Anderson offering sex toys and what not.

    12. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then everyone wins. We keep our privacy, and Facebook makes money. Looks like a win-win situation to me! (since I'm using their service, I'm "happy" that they make money and don't go out of business).

    13. Re:Who didn't see this one coming? by highfidelitychris · · Score: 1

      Tell them your home address is 1060 W Addison, Chicago, IL (yeah, that one's kinda lame, copying SNL is good only for laughs).

      I think you mean the Blues Brothers, not SNL.

  11. Forest Gump was a wise man ... by tgd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stupid is as stupid does.

    If you a) put your address and phone number online and b) click to specifically allow an application to access them, too fucking bad if something bad happens.

    I'm so tired of the complete lack of personal responsibility these days.

    1. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Chaonici · · Score: 2

      You speak as though this absolves Facebook of any responsibility in the matter, when it does not. People have a reasonable expectation that they can limit who sees what they post on a social networking profile. For Facebook to decide that personal info is open by default, such as in this case, is nothing short of an appalling lack of personal responsibility on /their/ part.

      You are correct in that people need to be more careful with what they put online, but companies like Facebook also have duties to responsibly handle what users post on their services. As far as I've seen, Facebook frequently fails to live up to its expectations.

    2. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by tgd · · Score: 1

      Did you even RTFA? Or have you ever actually used Facebook?

      No app can access information you haven't authorized. For an existing app to access that, you'd have to re-authorize it.

      Facebook clearly believes there is some subset of apps in which that information is useful, and has made it available. Considering no one can access it if you (as I said) haven't a) added it and b) authorized it, I fail to see an issue.

    3. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Chaonici · · Score: 1

      Ohh, so users have to authorize it. Meaning they get an extra line on an app confirmation screen that they probably won't notice because such screens get mindlessly skipped all the time, much like EULAs. I guess that makes it okay, then!

    4. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by netsharc · · Score: 2

      Actually I used to have my contact info in my profile because I trust my friends (actually, lately I have people I barely know that I've stupidly approved) and I thought it would probably be convenient for them to have said information, and I don't have any privacy-violating apps installed. But disgustingly, apps your friends installed can also access your information, and this is the default setting unless you go in that mysterious region known as "The Settings" and disable that option.

      So yeah, fuck you Facebook. Fuck you to hell...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually I used to have my contact info in my profile because I trust my friends

      My friends already know my name, address, phone number, e-mail address, where I work, etc...... There would be no need to ever put it on Facebook.

    6. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 2

      App confirmation screens don't have a lot of text. Reading them is not not comparable to reading an EULA.

    7. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by microbee · · Score: 1

      I take that you read every sentence of every Term of Services and comprehend every word of it before you click any OK buttons?

      If so, you are my new hero.

    8. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, except that we end up paying for their stupidty one way or another (credit companies aren't simply going to eat these frauds for free...)

    9. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by stobbard · · Score: 1

      I think using Facebook from a smartphone is enough to give them your mobile number. At least I don't remember actively entering it. I only noticed that it was on fb, when it suddenly was visible to all my contacts. Removing it completely wasn't that easy either. To hide it from my contacts, setting the privacy options to "visible only to me" was enough, but you can't easily delete it from your profile. I had to enter a fake number.
      Now when I looked at Account Settings -> Mobile, there STILL was my real number. As a consequence I logged out from fb mobile, which I actually found quite usefulfor aggregating current (and voluntarily provided - which my private cell number was not) contact information.
      Goddammit, Facebook could be really useful if it had sane privacy politics...here's hoping for a better alternative to emerge soon...

    10. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Alejandros · · Score: 1

      Don't be so quick to blame the end user. It's not always obvious when you're adding personal information to facebook.

      Case in point: Using the facebook app on an iPhone (unsure about other smart phones) automatically adds your phone number to your personal details. And woe unto those who use "Contact sync", facebook will not only update your personal details with your phone number. It will also take all the phone numbers of your friends and family and upload those

      Blogspam with details You can see this for yourself. Go to: Account -> Edit friends -> Phonebook.

      There was a minor furor when this first came out and everyone appears to have forgotten it.

    11. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >No app can access information you haven't authorized.

      Until those obnoxious pricks change the privacy settings to "Allow The Whole World To See Everything" and opt you IN by default. They've done similar before.

    12. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      If you a) put your address and phone number online and b) click to specifically allow an application to access them, too fucking bad if something bad happens.

      I'm not worried about that. I'm worried about SOMEONE ELSE clicking to allow some random third-party application access to MY personal information, WITHOUT my authorization.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    13. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Assuming that people actually read them, regardless of how much text there is, is where you fail.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    14. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by tgd · · Score: 1

      No, to my original point, that is where you fail.

      If people who don't read them get screwed, I couldn't care any less. *That*, sir, was the point of my post.

    15. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Cwix · · Score: 1

      Yep, and when your friend's profiles gives away all your details, it will not matter one iota what your settings are.

      Being involved in facebook in *any* way will lead to an erosion of your privacy.

      That is where *YOU* fail good sir.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    16. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I guess that makes it okay, then!

      Yes, it does. And, no it doesn't mean they are stupid or lazy or irresponsible. It means they are making their own choices, as is their right.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    17. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I never agree to a contract unless I have read it, understood it, and determined that the terms are acceptable. I sometimes take my business elsewhere when presented with a contract so long that it isn't worth my while to take the time to read it.

      BTW most TOS documents are not contracts.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    18. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about SOMEONE ELSE clicking to allow some random third-party application access to MY personal information, WITHOUT my authorization.

      How did that someone else get your personal information?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    19. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by causality · · Score: 1

      Actually I used to have my contact info in my profile because I trust my friends

      My friends already know my name, address, phone number, e-mail address, where I work, etc...... There would be no need to ever put it on Facebook.

      This is one of the most seldom-appreciated aspects of Facebook and you nailed it.

      Facebook is not terribly useful for communicating with people who really are close friends of yours. Y'know, people you actually know well, who know you well, with whom you spend time face-to-face and are involved in each other's lives. In this capacity it's redundant.

      Facebook is "useful" for having a lot of extremely superficial relationships often involving people with whom you will spend little or no actual quality time. The reason you would have to supply personal contact information to your "friends" is because they're not friends; they're acquaintences at best.

      That's why Facebook tends to encourage behaviors that are not geared towards meaningful, close interaction. It caters to those who really want the attention of people they hardly know or don't know at all. That's why so many of its users don't value their privacy and are willing to surrender it. It's why so many apologists will show up in these discussions denying, rationalizing, and minimizing any abuses related to privacy or any questions about whether the users are acting in their own interests.

      They have to. Without a steady supply of superficial attention from casual strangers and acquaintences, they'd be forced to perform some introspection and understand why they so badly crave attention and recognition, why they crave those things from relationships that are so superficial and fungible as to be disposable.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    20. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by flyingkillerrobots · · Score: 1

      False. There are settings for not allowing allow friends' apps to access your information. Account -> Privacy Settings, scroll down to "Apps and Websites."

      --
      "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations..." -Winston Churchill
    21. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Tom · · Score: 1

      The problem with the Facebook permission structure is largely that a) you must give the application access if you want to use it and b) the application regularily has to ask for access to much more than it really needs, due to the way permissions are structured.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definiton of "know." My friends "know" my phone number in that if they have a need for it I tell them, and by now most probably have it in their phone book. However, some of them won't yet, and for them the logical place to look it up is Facebook, because there is/used to be a section for "Contact information" that had things I wanted my friends to have access to. Hell, my phone will use Facebook to populate its address list. This is a useful feature, and it annoys me that Facebook is providing people incentives to not put this info on their profiles.

      Mind you, I joined Facebook back when the only way to do so was a .edu email address, so the world was a somewhat different place then. Not to say that I shouldn't have seen this coming eventually, but so far it has been more useful than not to have the ability to find my friends' numbers (and them to find mine) online.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    23. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      b) click to specifically allow an application to access them, too fucking bad if something bad happens.

      You don't click to allow it. It just automatically happens because it's included amongst the various "basic settings" that you're not allowed to disable. Essentially you're told "do you want to allow this app access to your information" and that covers a shitload of stuff, which has been applied retroactively: your "basic information" (name), your profile information (random BS that you've "liked," basically), your contact information (this story), all pictures of you (includes pictures you're tagged in), and your friend's information.

      All of this is required for every single application, and none of it can be disabled. The only way around this is to simply never use Facebook applications. Which works for me as a solution, I guess, but I'd rather be allowed to opt out and use certain apps that have no legitimate reason to access my contact information.

      Even then it doesn't matter. Contact information currently appears limited to apps you install, but basically everything else on that list is also covered by any apps your friends install. So if your friend installs an app, that app automatically has access to everything an app you use does. You can opt out of this, by turning off each and every category individually.

      Again, contact information being given to third party apps is retroactive. I never gave permission, yet for some reason, they just silently added it without any notification that I can recall. I certainly wasn't re-asked to give permission on loading an app.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    24. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about SOMEONE ELSE clicking to allow some random third-party application access to MY personal information, WITHOUT my authorization.

      How did that someone else get your personal information?

      I submitted it, of course, setting my privacy settings to only allow it to be shared with my friends. I trust my friends not to deliberately share my address and phone number with anyone who shouldn't have it. I do NOT trust my friends to never ever play a game or take a quiz or run any of the myriad of other silly little applications they are constantly bombarded with on Facebook.

      Does this make me stupid, for trusting Facebook to respect what their privacy options appear to do? Is it unreasonable for a user to assume that when they choose the option that says "share this only with my friends, and nobody else" that the information will not be made widely available to random third parties?

      If that is unreasonable, why? Because Facebook exists on the Internet? Or is it because privacy statements and security settings don't mean anything? Or is it because Facebook is a business, trying to make money?

      If any of these is your answer, you're going to have a difficult time enjoying the comforts of modern society without ever providing personal information to a company that operates online and claims they'll keep your information confidential. Should I be afraid to submit my personal information to my bank via their web site, if they happen to be a private business trying to make money and have a privacy policy saying they won't share it with the world? What makes that OK?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    25. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      Not quite knowing of that which you write, is where *you* fail. In fact, one can set one's profile to not allow sharing with any app being used by any one. Blind hatred of Facebook is no less ignorant than blindly sharing one's personal data without care.

    26. Re:Forest Gump was a wise man ... by miketee · · Score: 1

      Go to Account >> Privacy >> Contact infomation. By default FB has "contact Information" set to "Friends Only", which isn't too bad as long as you trust all your FB friends.

      But maybe not all of someone's FB friends are trustworthy. And this becomes an issue when some users have hundreds of friends, accumulated at whim. In the case of contact info (as in other cases) FB provides some security mechanisms, but these are not always set to good defaults, and they can be changed with little or no notice.

      So I think it's case of Facebook's lack of consideration, or deliberate data-mining and users' lack of personal responsibility.

      That said, personally there's no way that I will give FB *ANY* personal info (such as address, phone number etc.) that isn't absolutely necessary, This is despite FB's cute recent ploy to obtain such data by saying my account is "insecure", meaning that the data would help if I have login problems. This is plainly just an attempt to data-mine, as FB already has techniques such as friend-recognition to verify troublesome logins. I tell my friends my phone number personally. Or they can message me on FB (if they must) and I will *email* them my contact (not via Facebook).

  12. How far do you go? by Haedrian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I image facebook development to be like a gameshow. They place bets on what changes they need to make to ruin privacy, until an amount of people actually leave.

    I'm sure the next step will be medical records, legal records or naked pictures.

    1. Re:How far do you go? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the next step will be medical records, legal records or naked pictures.

      Ah, so you've gotten a preview of the "Facebook doctor, lawyer, and glamor photography" apps.

    2. Re:How far do you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... naked friends? you dont have any friends who put stuff up and think it's "private"?
      last I saw for example fishki.net have a weekly thread about girls from facebook :)

    3. Re:How far do you go? by martyros · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the next step will be medical records, legal records or naked pictures.

      I almost feel like if you put your medical records, legal records, and naked pictures of yourself on FB, you deserve what you get. Not really, but almost.

      Seriously, I've consistently made it a point not to put stuff on FB I wouldn't want everyone to see. My mom, my boss, people from high school -- I know they're all listening when I post something. And, I know that if I go to a country like China, it's not unlikely that the Chinese government could see that information if they decided they want to. So, there are a lot of things about my life that I don't post about. FB knows about the good things, but not the bad things; and there are some pretty cruddy things going on in my life right now that you wouldn't know about by looking at my Facebook feed.

      So why do I care if some company has my address? What are they going to do with it -- send me mail? I already get tons of junk mail and fliers. Heck, my bank probably sells my name, address, and marketable details about me already. What's the big deal?

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

  13. What did you expect? by paiute · · Score: 1

    Knowing the origins of Facebook, did anyone expect MZ to be a beacon of ethical behavior?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:What did you expect? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      A lot of regular folks don't know the origins of Facebook. They just think it's the new AOL or something.

    2. Re:What did you expect? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I suspect that a lot of people didn't. I personally didn't until relatively recently, it's just that I'm opposed to posting that sort of information about myself online in general.

    3. Re:What did you expect? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And most of the people haven't read the T&Cs. Try quoting some of the rights that they've granted to Facebook to them, and watch their shocked expressions.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  14. why enter that info at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why exactly would you enter that information into Facebook in the first place? I don't have an FB account so I don't know whether it's useful for anything. Anyone? Perhaps the city you're in, but what would your street address be needed for when sharing photos and such?

    Similarly with your mobile number: is there some crucial functionality that needs valid data and not something like 111-555-1212?

    1. Re:why enter that info at all? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      A lot of people use it as a telephone directory. It's quite helpful when you work with different people every few weeks and need to contact the other members of your team. OTOH, while I have my general location in Facebook, I don't quite see the benefit of putting a street address up. Some people might use it for driving navigation, but I figure I'd prefer people to call and ask for my address before they drop by.

  15. Huh? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    But it's right there on the app install warning page. FB isn't silently doing this.
    "THIS APPLICATION WILL COLLECT YOUR MOBILE PHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS."

    and so on...

    If you are the kind of user that ignores warnings, you have much bigger problems than this on your hands.

    Clueless people like the guy in the Twitter screenshot setting his phone number to the FB customer support is an idiot. Why? Just. Do. Not. Approve.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Huh? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Who is putting their home address and phone number up there anyway? Same goes for birthdays. Even before this I wouldn't trust FB with any important info.

      Currently my info is 555-5555 123 Fake St.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    2. Re:Huh? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      But it's right there on the app install warning page. FB isn't silently doing this.
      "THIS APPLICATION WILL COLLECT YOUR MOBILE PHONE NUMBER AND ADDRESS."

      It's more like:

      THIS APPLICATION IS TOTALLY AWESOME AND $friend1, $friend2, AND 300 OTHER FRIENDS USE IT!!! !!!!
      [ALLOW]


      [deny] Facebook thinks your private data is important. This application won't not collect your mobile phone number nor address. Facebook always takes care to monitor your private data* appropriately.
      *Entering your mobile phone number or address into Facebook renders a reclassification from private to public. Facebook still agrees that your phone number is private data, but Facebook's record of what your phone number is is available for sale to the top 1000 highest bidders. Thank you for reading through this legalese. The timeout on the choice should happen now, with the default of Allow. Enjoy the application!

  16. An even better option... by mfearby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...delete your account! Well, at least do your best to delete as much of it as you can. As soon as I learnt years ago that you could never delete your Facebook account I knew never to sign up to that rubbish. And Facebook have vindicated my decision every step of the way ever since.

    You'd be a complete nutjob to be using Facebook. I hope that Diaspora is made available to the public in some form this year, though I'm reasonably content with Twitter.

    1. Re:An even better option... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...delete your account! Well, at least do your best to delete as much of it as you can. As soon as I learnt years ago that you could never delete your Facebook account I knew never to sign up to that rubbish. And Facebook have vindicated my decision every step of the way ever since.

      Actually, the best solution is to probably replace all your personal information in your account with fake information. Maybe then, at least, Facebook will think you moved. Maybe you will get even luckier and they will lose your old data in a backup failure. If you just delete your account, I am sure they know you are on to them and try to sell your info to the highest bidder!

    2. Re:An even better option... by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'd be a complete nutjob to be using Facebook.

      You'd be a "nutjob" to trust any vital information to Facebook. But I submit to you that there are millions of highly educated and/or computer savvy facebook users. Classifying them all as "nutjobs" is silly. I have a facebook account. I don't post anything on my profile or anywhere else that I consider to be important. I don't post pictures of my children on Facebook (and nor does my wife).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:An even better option... by stephathome · · Score: 1

      That's how I handle it too. It's nice to have an easy way to be in contact with family and friends I don't see much, but if I don't want it out there, Facebook doesn't get it.

      The only thing I consider nutty about using Facebook is sharing too much information. Don't share when you're going on vacation. Don't share your address or phone number. Don't share embarrassing photos or any other photo you don't want other people to see. Don't share information that could get you in trouble down the line.

      Same as with any other website.

    4. Re:An even better option... by wgoodman · · Score: 4, Funny

      My current city: Constantinople.
      But I'm from Istanbul.

      They can use all of my info they want to, it's all lies.

    5. Re:An even better option... by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you post nothing of importance, only useless shit? I guess that is a useful tactic to scare other users off facebook.

      I suspect that's flamebait but I'll bite. I don't post anything of importance from a security standpoint. I might post that I had fun at someone's event - I don't post about it ni avance. I might post that I'm feeling sick or tired, I don't post my doctor's report. I might post that a gadget I own is frustrating me but I don't post an inventory of what I own. I might say my child's done something amusing, but I don't post their whereabouts. I might post that something is going on in the area I live in, but I don't post street address or GPS co-ordinates or phone numbers.

      In other words I'm careful. If you don't care about what my frustrations are, what amusing things my kids did etc. sure you'll consider it "useless shit". That is BY DESIGN.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:An even better option... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why people would move to Diaspora. They're snobs who won't design for IE. The "get a real browser" message when you try to use IE is asinine. I used to be a web developing minion and I don't use IE but I sure spent tons of time optimizing sites for IE because that's what the majority of people use. Sure, take the high and mighty route, but let's see how many people are going to move. They aren't even going to be able to compete with friendster. It's taking an Apple computer elitist view that doesn't work on social networks.

      Making a social network site that people will go to in mass is a hard thing to do. People don't care about privacy since they don't see it obviously effecting them. If you offered free houses in Chernobyl people would live there. There's over 500 million "complete nutjob"s on facebook and I'd reckon 499 million of them don't know/care about privacy.

      I like social network sites. I have the privacy set to where I like it. That's only good for keeping the average human stalker type out of my business. I know that facebook makes money by selling my info. I travel a lot and it's a simple way to keep contact with friends and relatives. Everyone is on facebook and it'll stay that way for a long time. Basically, this is a long winded way of saying if there's another move to a different network, it's not going to be one that doesn't play fair with browsers.

    7. Re:An even better option... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I don't see why people would move to Diaspora. They're snobs who won't design for IE.

      Interesting. Perhaps I'll try it.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:An even better option... by McTickles · · Score: 1

      This is hoping they don't keep a history of all changes on the account...

    9. Re:An even better option... by causality · · Score: 0

      "get a real browser" message when you try to use IE is asinine.

      Microsoft's refusal to produce a browser that will correctly render sites that work in every other major browser is what's asinine. What you're complaining about is merely a reaction to it. If you really want to identify problems, start with their source.

      As Microsoft has plenty of wealth, resources, and talent it is reasonable to assume that its refusal to make a truly standards-compliant browser is deliberate. They are certainly capable of doing it; therefore if they don't, it is because they are choosing not to.

      I used to be a web developing minion and I don't use IE but I sure spent tons of time optimizing sites for IE because that's what the majority of people use.

      You were one Web developer who had to perform extra work to make your sites work in IE. How many Web developers exist worldwide? How many otherwise unnecessary hours have they collectively spent over the years just to accommodate this one browser? What is the total cost of all of this to the businesses that hire and employ those Web developers? Let's call this cost $BIG_FIGURE. Morally and/or ethically, how do you justify Microsoft deliberately and knowingly inflicting a cost of $BIG_FIGURE on an entire industry just so it can play games with IE's marketshare figures?

      I'd be happy with two outcomes, myself. Scenario one: all affected businesses and individual developers can collect their portion of $BIG_FIGURE from Microsoft as a civil tort, to compensate them for the extra expenses they incurred due to Microsoft's parasitic decision-making. That would definitely end the problem, as I believe $BIG_FIGURE is so large it more than outweighs any gains Microsoft enjoyed from playing compatibility games.

      Scenario two: more and more Web developers refuse to accommodate IE. Instead, they pick any three standards-complaint browsers, make sure the site correctly renders in them, and inform any IE users with problems that they are using a browser which deliberately breaks compatibility and that they should contact Microsoft with any further questions. That wouldn't work if only a few sites did it, but if it were a commonplace practice it would definitely end the problem. It would also encourage users to think more carefully about the vendors they choose to support.

      No, the "high and mighty" route, as you put it, is the way Microsoft wants to knowingly cause problems for many other people for the sake of their own enrichment and then expects those people to do nothing about it. People who refuse to put up with this and take available actions against it are not high and mighty; they are merely sane and interested in ending a problem that should never have existed.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    10. Re:An even better option... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      I don't use IE unless I'm on a site that demands it. It's from way back from choosing a browser for the first time. I was a lynx holdout and occasionally I still use lynx because it makes me laugh. Champion of the underdogs. Luckily being forced to use IE hasn't happened for a long time.

      If it was up to me, as King of the World, IE would've complied in the early days. It didn't happen then, and it's not happening now.

      By not playing along with The Great Evil, you just cut off users, and when you're trying to create a social networking site, that's insane. So, my ass, which is highly tuned for laziness, or "the path of least resistance" says good luck to Diaspora by cutting off potential users in the early beta phase. Might as well make a lynx based social network.

    11. Re:An even better option... by aaaurgh · · Score: 1

      Sadly, your level of care and consideration about what you post on FB is very much in the minority, I suspect the very vast majority don't even give such ideas a second (or even first) thought.

      --

      Go permanent? In your dreams and my worst nightmares.
    12. Re:An even better option... by causality · · Score: 1

      If it was up to me, as King of the World, IE would've complied in the early days. It didn't happen then, and it's not happening now.

      It's not happening now precisely because of the apathy you advocate. No one wants to lift a finger against it the second that might mean a little discomfort. Microsoft is a very shrewd marketing company -- they understand this. It is what they count on.

      What I don't think you appreciate is that if most people decided that they'd never tolerate the kind of shit Microsoft likes to pull, no matter what the cost, Microsoft would respond by not trying to pull that shit in the first place. The unwillingness to put up with it is the strongest deterrent. If it's genuine enough, you'll almost never have to actually prove it. A savvy company like Microsoft would wet their finger, hold it up towards the wind, and quickly decide that taking an action most people will resist is not a good business strategy.

      By not playing along with The Great Evil, you just cut off users, and when you're trying to create a social networking site, that's insane.

      Anyone who thinks you're going to resist or even just undermine anything remotely "evil", let alone a "Great Evil", without ever suffering any kind of discomfort or lack of luxury has, very simply, never struggled for anything worthy in his life. It's one thing to be a bit lazy. It's quite another to have no principles for which you are willing to take a stand, to be so thoroughly compromised and dominated by convenience that you prioritize it above all else.

      So, my ass, which is highly tuned for laziness, or "the path of least resistance" says good luck to Diaspora by cutting off potential users in the early beta phase. Might as well make a lynx based social network.

      Actually if that meant Diaspora users tend to have enough of a conscience to be aware of the network effects of their actions, and therefore would not use IE on principle alone because of its harmful effects on the standardized Web, that would be a major plus for Diaspora. It would be a unique feature qualitatively distinguishing it from all other social networks.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    13. Re:An even better option... by muridae · · Score: 1

      Are your friends as careful?

      Give it a few years. Someone will post a "Opps, sorry I didn't catch you yesterday. Happy Belated Birthday." One of your children's friends will mention their school by name. It doesn't take a genius to know you have a smartphone when/if you post from it and it signs all the posts. Someone else posts a picture from your kids birthday party, and leaves it geotagged. It doesn't take you screwing up at all for those details to get out there.

      The question becomes, is it even possible to control all of this information. If it isn't possible at all, do we just accept that or do we attempt to throw off the data mining techniques with stealth and tom-foolery.

    14. Re:An even better option... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Are your friends as careful?

      You have a very valid point but that can't be helped. We've had friends tag our children and asked them to remove the tags (yeah I know damage done if someone's paying attention).

      At the moment I assume it's not worth mining data in this way at the moment. If I were rich, lived in a country where kidnappers florished, was a politically exposed person or celebrity, I'd have to just get the hell off Facebook to at least discourage information being leaked. I'm fortunate enough not to need to be so paranoid....for the moment at least. There are much greater dangers to worry about.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:An even better option... by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      My basic point about Diaspora is it's a social network. You have to go out of your way to make it accessible for everyone and even then, odds are very low that 500 million people are going to switch even if you gave them Netflix for a year. How are they going to earn income by fighting for personal privacy and being anti-IE.

      In the 90s and early 2000s when I was stuck making sites work on IE, I used to bitch a lot about it. I couldn't stop by every user's place to say "Well, you know, IE goes out of it's way to make it hard for other browsers by not complying with standards". Computers are an appliance like cars or dishwashers. Most users don't care about intricacies.

      I had a weird sense of pride that the sites would look good for Netscape, Opera and other browsers that most users didn't use. Just because people shouldn't have to use IE. I would love it if people didn't use it until Microsoft is forced to comply. I've been waiting on that for over a decade.

      Diaspora vs Microsoft won't even register on Microsoft. Tilting at windmills.

      As an aside, I went to the lynx page and tried to validate its html. It tentatively passed with 2 warnings.

    16. Re:An even better option... by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      There's not much that can really be done about it though. As much as we may want to take care of our own privacy, there's still a good chance that our friends will expose our data for us. If, say, a someone who doesn't know you asks a mutual friend for your address, telephone number, SSN, transcoded genome, etc. - it could easily be gone as easily as that. And it could be even more innocuous still; what if they just post pictures or videos that happens to have something that could lead to more information about you (a barely visible business card, an envelope with your address, the results of an AFM scan on your HDD) Sure it's not useful for data mining per se, but still, if someone wants to get information from you, and even if you're doing well to take care of yourself, others may be undoing all your hard work for you.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    17. Re:An even better option... by HJED · · Score: 1

      Dispora is currently available to the public (though lacking many features) , there's a list of sites running Dispora which includes up time data here

      --
      null
    18. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey jackass...what happens when someone ELSE posts information about you? Oh...you didn't think of that? Glad I could help smack you into into reality.

      AC because I'm too lazy to login.

    19. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the moment I assume it's not worth mining data in this way at the moment.

      Data mining is by now a very efficiently automated process and I am sure Facebook is right at the forefront, because that is their sole business model.

      Think about it. How much effort would it really take for a computer to cross-correlate you and e.g. your children?
      Even if you do not post from the same IP rather often, you have at least roughly the same geolocation. Your posts about "family events" correlate. Very likely your choice of words correlates (kids pick that up from adults). Or whatever the sick minds at Facebook can come up with.

      And that are just the closest nodes of your "social network". The spiders of Facebook will climb happily along any thread they can find...

      It is hard to make people anonymous if you collect sufficiently large datasets even if you *try* which Facebook does not.
      And by trying I mean e.g. actively formulating questions and pre-formulating answers in ways that they can not be cross-correlated by machines.

      There's a census coming up here in Germany, and I have paid some attention to the problem of how you can keep people anonymous. And it is quite hard.

    20. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did that. I'd also recommend using a fake address and phone number by default for all online submissions, and only update them if an institution needs to know them.

      I use 10 Downing Street for my address. And 0800 100 200 for the phone number.

      I don't think just updating your data to this is enough. They will keep historical data.

    21. Re:An even better option... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why people would move to Diaspora. They're snobs who won't design for IE

      That's a minor issue. The real with Diaspora is that they focussed entirely on the easy part (the UI), and not at all on the protocols for federation. No one with even the slightest clue is involved in designing the protocols. If they had a good design and well-documented protocols then it wouldn't matter so much that their code sucks - you could easily create something that interoperated with them. There's a fork that implements the OneSocialWeb protocols, which has some potential.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:An even better option... by highacnumber · · Score: 1

      My current city: Constantinople. But I'm from Istanbul.

      They can use all of my info they want to, it's all lies.

      That's quite a Byzantine method of obfuscation.

    23. Re:An even better option... by blackpig · · Score: 1

      Works fine here in IE8...

    24. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine you don't have to, the way Facebook is going someone with less brain power will post it for you, and then tag you with it.

    25. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why'd you change it?

    26. Re:An even better option... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      I don't post anything on my profile or anywhere else that I consider to be important. I don't post pictures of my children on Facebook (and nor does my wife).

      Uh...why?

      Surely you understand that the paranoia about child abduction is mostly overblown? And that someone who decides to kidnap a kid isn't going to go to Facebook looking at parent-posted photos like some sort of child rapist's catalog, he/she is going to drive the street is his/her windowless van offering candy? And that you can control who can see your photos on Facebook, so you can share photos of your kids with friends and family but not strangers?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    27. Re:An even better option... by sutekh137 · · Score: 1

      Putting what people may or may not be able to figure out about you aside, at what point does the "I don't post anything like that" equate to, "Hm, I don't post ANYTHING very important on Facebook, and it actually takes a bit of CPU-time for me to even decide WHAT to post."

      When that point is reached (if it is, at least in part), what are you gaining from Facebook? To put it another way, do the upside/downside ratio on using Facebook. We hear about the downsides all the time, though they don't appear to bother you, and that's cool. However, what is the upside? Furthermore, what upsides are there that you can't have via normal interactions, both virtual and non-virtual?

      Does Facebook increase your quality of life, overall?
         

    28. Re:An even better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you don't post pictures of your kids, but how long until friends of yours (and eventually, friends of theirs) do?
      There's just no escaping it any more.

      The option is to avoid FB entirely, but how long until they allow users to set up dummy accounts for friends who have not yet succumbed, and then start adding personal info on your behalf. You will probably be sent an invitation, and find the only way to limit the information is to take charge of the account yourself.

      Privacy is now, more than ever, a complete myth.

      Funfunfun!

    29. Re:An even better option... by muridae · · Score: 1

      You assume that data mining is a targeted process. It can be, don't get me wrong; one could pick a target and follow breadcrumbs to dig up lots of information. Usually, though, marketing agencies are not after the rich and powerful, they are after information about you and me. That information is not picked over, analyzed piece by piece for some glimmer of data that might be overlooked. It is simply stored, aggregated in a massive database of potential customers. However, you are optimistic to think that that deleted tag was ever deleted. That link, between your kids and you, their name, is now a known fact in that database; not a speculation. Any company that copied that data between when the tag was visible and when you had them delete it now owns a privileged fact about you. Alone, that probably is worthless; you could make that connection a hundred other ways and as you said you probably aren't important enough. But a database of thousands and millions of unique facts becomes worth something to another advertising or marketing company. No one is going to delete that potential gold mine. And at the moment, it isn't worth their time to process that data down to know everything about your life. But, at the current rate, it will be.

      This entire process is a problem that will affect everyone at some point. Like junk mail and spam, personalized marketing will become cheaper than the alternative. And that data is already out there.

  17. Just you wait by tiberiumx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, delete all you want now. Next Facebook will open up the history for every field. Think of the cool 'dating/breakup timeline' an application could build.

    1. Re:Just you wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to see a sex chart for all the 40-somethings that hooked up with people they knew in high school. I don't know how widespread that phenomenon was, but it sure was common in my circle of friends.

  18. Wow!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yet another example of why facebook is a sack of shit company that doesn't care about their user privacy.

    Some one should post the personal and banking info for every employee of facebook online.

    I am glad I have never used that steaming turd ... zuckerface is a lying asshole.

  19. and? by mayberry42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Troll me if you want, but, while i do find this appalling, i cant feel sympathetic to people who post up their personal, private information for their "friends" to see and then later become victims. There's no valid reason for people to put it up and just leaves them vulnerable to exploitation (see previous facebook slashdot story), especially if you're not required to post it (and if you were, use fake data). Someone wants your address? let them ask it you for it.They want to call you? let them ask you for your phone number in person. Or by private email. At the very least you'll have control over who gets it and who does not, rather than people you randomly friended over time and have no idea who they are (yes, it happens).

    I've kept my profile (almost) empty for over a year now - believe me when i say you won't miss your data not being up there for the world to see...

    1. Re:and? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I've kept my profile (almost) empty for over a year now

      Well, I've kept my profile nonexistent. I can live quite well without a Facebook account.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:and? by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's the old "then they came for me" thing. Even if Facebook users are insufferable cunts, they are the cool crowd and any legislation or standard corporate policy (but I repeat myself) concerning privacy will be determined by how they react to what might hitherto have been regarded as an offensive breach of privacy.

      IOW, if Facebook is allowed to continue behaving like this, people will just go, "oh you don't have any privacy anyway, get over it!" with your viewpoint being drowned out. In fact, I've heard a lot of younger people say this. (And a small subset of older guys who always end up having been involved in some way in their employment history with processing large amounts of personal data.)

    3. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been times when I've only managed to contact someone because their info was up on facebook. For whatever reason their mobile had gone flat and I didn't have their home phone number at the time.

      That said, facebooks ever changing privacy policies do seem to argue about keeping it as sparse as possible. What is needed is an organisation that fufills the same need as facebook, but starts of with a bloody constitution that can't be changed without consulting a big chunk of its own users.

      Might see if RMS has any ideas on how to apply free software ideals to cloud hosted data.

    4. Re:and? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      i cant feel sympathetic to people who post up their personal, private information for their "friends" to see and then later become victims.

      What if you remove the quotes around "friends"? A lot of people on facebook have real friends, and on first signing up years ago, they were led to believe that Facebook would respect privacy settings (not reset them to fully open, or suddenly remove some privacy settings, like the profile pics, home-town info, likes, etc), and would only use the data internally for marketing within Facebook, not sell it to other companies. Then Facebook decided that they'd just *give* the data away since that wasn't covered by the initial user agreements, and they'd change a format, force users to re-enter old data, and tack on a tiny line of legalese that said "entering data into the new improved profile form makes it public data". People believed Facebook when it started, so they posted a lot of personal stuff because they really thought only their friends and Facebook saw it, and that seemed like an acceptable deal. Increasingly, ordinary people are finding it to be unacceptable.

    5. Re:and? by causality · · Score: 1

      What if you remove the quotes around "friends"? A lot of people on facebook have real friends, and on first signing up years ago, they were led to believe that Facebook would respect privacy settings (not reset them to fully open, or suddenly remove some privacy settings, like the profile pics, home-town info, likes, etc), and would only use the data internally for marketing within Facebook, not sell it to other companies.

      If it were merely "led to believe" then they'd abandon Facebook at the very first sign of failing to respect their privacy. There have been many such signs and they steadily increase in both number and severity. Thus, "led to believe" is a misnomer; this is more like "religiously insist on believing in the face of contrary evidence". That's the problem.

      Increasingly, ordinary people are finding it to be unacceptable.

      After a while "ordinary" starts to mean "after having touched the hot stove for the 100th time and received a burn for the 100th time, begins to suspect that touching a hot stove is a bad idea and that this is a predictable outcome." That's the problem.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    6. Re:and? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...received a burn for the 100th time...

      What "burns" have they received?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:and? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want to call you? let them ask you for your phone number in person. Or by private email.

      What is your phone number but a method to contact you? Why make it a two-stage process to call you rather than one-stage?

    8. Re:and? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      > ...received a burn for the 100th time...

      What "burns" have they received?

      Exactly. So far, it's like the canadian geese that spend summers in my neighborhood. They're protected by law, so they "learn" that humans aren't dangerous and that cars always stop for them when they cross the street. It's rare to find one dead on the side of the road, but by rights, they should be plucked and cooked for dinner. As things are now, you can almost walk up to one and club it.

      That's how the ad/app companies think about Facebook users. They're just waiting for Facebook to lift the protections.

  20. On the hate for Facebook... by yuhong · · Score: 1

    I will ask this again: Why didn't MySpace gain from the hate for Facebook here on Slashdot?

    1. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because MySpace is the replacement of Geocities.

    2. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "MyLackOfComfortableCSSUseSpace with a SWF streaming a mp3 from some poor sap's server" isn't in favored.

    3. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      I will ask this again: Why didn't MySpace gain from the hate for Facebook here on Slashdot?

      Because their software was crap and their site was noisy (in more senses than one).

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    4. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by ocdscouter · · Score: 2

      I really miss embedded midi.

    5. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I will ask this again: Why didn't MySpace gain from the hate for Facebook here on Slashdot?

      Goggle melting HTML. You get no second chances with that stuff.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coz myspace is shit

    7. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boo fucking hoo. I'm getting pretty damned sick of all the people who get so fucking upset the second someone dares to criticize Facebook. You must have your head up your ass, because Slashdot is NOT a place full of "hate" for Facebook, quite the opposite. Just about any Facebook-related article is filled with kneejerk defenders of Zuckerberg's empire (just witness all the smartass idiots who posted "phone book" and "white pages" above). And any legitimate criticism of Facebook is always done half heartedly in the following manner "Oh facebook has lots of features, I have an account...BUT..."

      I don't care how god damned useful you fools think Facebook is, nor do I care that you re-connected with your twice-divorced high-school sweetheart because of it, nor do I care how "I use it to put up pictures." Zuckerberg is a scumbag who has, quite openly said, "Privacy is for suckers, I AM going to sell every bit about you to advertisers and there is nothing you can do about it." See, even someone standing up and saying to your face "I AM GOING TO FUCK YOU" means nothing to the iPhone Generation--you all just keep on your endless love-fest for Facebook while Zuckerberg digs deeper and deeper into your lives, selling off every small piece of information he can get his greedy, unethical hands on. Hell the asshole even has his own propaganda movie to give him a "human" face. Even Bill Gates didn't try that one.

      If you don't think that the "powers that be" don't have a larger plan for the information mining scam that is Facebook, you're an idiot. Obama's gov't has said they want a universal "log in" for the web, but they aren't going to be the ones to do it. Goldman Crooks threw BILLIONS into this so-called "networking" site...WHY exactly? Just look at all the "You must log into Facebook in order to comment" buttons appearing everywhere and connect the god damn dots.

      Ah but you won't. I'm a "hater." I just "hate" because in pop culture vernacular, I couldn't possibly have any real reasons for objecting to something.

      --Chickenhead, who refuses to even get a Slashdot account

    8. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      That's like deciding you really don't like getting the casserole out of the oven without oven mitts, so as an alternative you're not having casserole. Instead you are having your own eyeballs for dinner, raw, freshly dug out from your eye sockets with your burned bare hands.

      --
      This space available.
    9. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Zuckerberg is a scumbag who has, quite openly said, "Privacy is for suckers, I AM going to sell every bit about you to advertisers and there is nothing you can do about it."

      Source please.

      ou must have your head up your ass, because Slashdot is NOT a place full of "hate" for Facebook, quite the opposite.

      I was just looking at the comments modded up.

    10. Re:On the hate for Facebook... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the design was ass. I think they reworked the design, but too little, too late.

  21. Never trust any online service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't ever use any personal information on any service except a throwaway e-mail address.

    Don't ever subscribe to any social web service.

    Personally, I have never subscribed to any social web service and i still enjoy a decent personal life. Any information I want to share with friends or family is on a personal webpage on a private server.

     

  22. That would be the straw for me. by i58 · · Score: 1

    I'm sick of them taking liberties as they see fit.
    1. Friends Un-Friended
    2. Profile gutted of everything
    3. Account deleted
    4. Profit for Z! *not from me*

    1. Re:That would be the straw for me. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

      That's fine for anything from this point forward but they still have everything ELSE that you've posted up to now.

  23. The real problem by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    This isn't a problem for me because I don't put my address or phone number on Facebook. And within 2 minutes of me reading this on Slashdot, the good lady was informed and now she has removed her phone number.

    I also don't allow ANY apps. I use Facebook to keep in contact with people, not as a pass-time.

    What I see as the real problem for the greater Facebook population is when, inevitably, Facebook allows advertisers (or anyone else who will pay) carte blanche access to people's profile information without their permission or knowledge.

    There are two facts here:
    1. Facebook's business model relies on advertisers being able to access people's information.
    2. Generally people do not want advertisers to access their information.

    I am sure there will come a time when Facebook decides that the siter's users don't need to be involved in the decision about who has access to their information.

  24. Why give out private info? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

    What would make you want to give Facebook your address in the first place? I don't mind ZIP code, but nothing more specific than that.

    Further, why give out your phone number? Unless you are a business, why does Facebook need it? Worst case, get a Google Voice account number and have your calls forwarded.

    Even more foolish is giving out your complete birthday. I can see how it is nice to get greetings on your birthday, but it's not worth the extra info for identify fraud. Put in 1900 (or whatever they first allow) and the 1st day of the week you're born. You still get nice birthday wishes at about the right time.

    1. Re:Why give out private info? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Even more foolish is giving out your complete birthday. I can see how it is nice to get greetings on your birthday, but it's not worth the extra info for identify fraud. Put in 1900 (or whatever they first allow) and the 1st day of the week you're born. You still get nice birthday wishes at about the right time.

      But the people who really know your birthday wait until that day. I've seen some people without birthdays entered on FB who still get wall-birthday-wishes on their true birthday. It's especially awesome when friends list the age too. "LOL, you 40 today! How's it, old man?" Friends' comments/tags/statuses are pretty big sieves for information to leak through.

    2. Re:Why give out private info? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you can always delete those messages. Further, it's unlikely that unformatted information like that is going to end up in a mass database since it would require a human interface to parse.

  25. Time to make a popular app by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Does Facebook have a fart app yet? Maybe I should make one and just watch the address & phone numbers roll in.

  26. Irony... by stms · · Score: 0

    The apple 1984 commercial is getting more and more ironic every day now.

    1. Re:Irony... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The apple 1984 commercial is getting more and more ironic every day now.

      Because Apple owns Facebook?

    2. Re:Irony... by stms · · Score: 0

      No because it (sort of) marked the beginning of mainstream computer use and computers may ultimately become the tool that take away all our freedoms.

  27. Re:Sophos: "New level of danger for Facebook users by syousef · · Score: 1

    Like us on Facebook.

    That one is the one I hate worst. Yes, it's a short way to say you like or hate a comment, but when you need to post a "Facebook like" to a person or company to get a warm fuzzy it's time to admit your social skills are all but gone.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  28. Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully this will hurry along the end of Facebook, condemning it to live out its days with AOL and the like. It's truly an annoying entity since so many people use it, and so many people are dumb.

    1. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hopefully this will hurry along the end of Facebook, condemning it to live out its days with AOL and the like. It's truly an annoying entity since so many people use it, and so many people are dumb.

      Dumb people have an overwhelming need to feel special, important, and the center of attention. That's why they also like to create drama incidentally. Facebook is an absolute magnet for them. I will laugh with glee if they get stung by this. Hey, you *wanted* attention - now you got it, from Marketing!

      Idiots will always surrender precious, irreplacable things like privacy for a little temporary gratification. Gets 'em every time. Their failure to recognize and learn from the many, many mistakes of other idiots is why they remain such idiots, why it's not a temporary condition.

      This is totally different from things like driving or voting where idiots might cause suffering to non-idiots. For that I am grateful.

    2. Re:Nice! by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Yes...Facebook, Twitter and whatever the next time wasting, privacy invading social site is next need just die.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Social sites are great if you have friends. Obviously you don't.

    4. Re:Nice! by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Social sites are great if you have friends. Obviously you don't.

      Odd, I have friends; its one of the reasons why I have little time for social sites.

      And my friends all know that one of the quickest ways to piss me off when we're hanging out together is to be constantly checking/updating facebook.

    5. Re:Nice! by RabbitWho · · Score: 1

      Great thing about twitter is that it's not really a social networking site anymore. Most people don't post about themselves at all, it's more like slashdot. You share interesting stories and articles you read. And you follow your favourite news sources, journalists, writers, etc. But it's better than Slashdot now in my opinion because you get the information sooner. Not to mention slashdot users are often unfriendly and endlessly looking for opportunities to act superior to each other, where as in twitter you want your stream to stay interesting and dynamic and don't waste your time on the typical petty arguments typical of other social outlets on the internet.

    6. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS. THIS TIMES 1,000,000,000.
      Memo to Failbook users who put your entire lives on Failbook: You're fucking morons, each and every one of you, and you will get the Hell that you're creating for yourselves when you discover how valuable your privacy was well after you've cast it aside as worthless -- and I will LAUGH at you and point at you like the village idiots you are.

    7. Re:Nice! by sycodon · · Score: 2

      "Friends" are not links on a web page.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  29. European clients? by Teun · · Score: 1
    I wonder if this company has a Safe Harbour agreement with the EU for clients from that jurisdiction.

    I know this agreement is voluntary and not monitored until after the fact but EU citizen have contrary to their US brethren far more privacy protection.

    Would these third parties misuse the gained information on EU citizen this could bring them grief, the ex-competition officer has a few months ago taken on the responsibility of the digital agenda.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:European clients? by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be ironic if Iron Neelie were to slam facebook for privacy abuses when she herself has a facebook page?

      If she were to delete her profile in response to this it might be a good gesture. She has been pushing online privacy strongly, and facebook almost certainly doesn't comply to EU-US safe harbour privacy principles.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    2. Re:European clients? by McTickles · · Score: 2

      Europe here...

      Indeed, Facebook could easily face major problems with European laws if some EU users would wake up and realize they are being fucked over ...

  30. People really don't care about their information by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I was at a gathering yesterday. Met a few new people, nice guys, and I asked one of them for his phone number. I handed him my phone (with the "new contact" sheet open) to type his number, and after a few minutes I started to wonder what kind of novel he's typing in my phone. I'm kinda wary of people snooping through my contacts, so I asked him for the phone back. His response "one sec, I gotta fill in the work place".

    Usually, I expect a name (not necessarily the real one, some handle to identify a person with) and a phone number. What I got from this person was name, address, 2 phone numbers, work phone, workplace, address of work and a few more tidbits that I wouldn't even give a fuck about if I tried to go for ID theft.

    People really don't give half a shit about their personal data. And I honestly wonder whether my work makes me simply overly paranoid. Am I? Most people that know me know me by some nickname or handle, few acquaintances outside of work have my real name. I also rarely "reuse" a nick, usually different groups of people know me by different names (and hence, Opportunist is not used anywhere else).

    So am I too paranoid or are people too careless?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Does this change anything? by angus77 · · Score: 0

    If people were stupid enough to put that shit up in the first place, what makes anyone think that they'd be smart enough to take it down now?

  32. Hello 21st century... by ritzer · · Score: 1


    You can already get most of that information online. Last time I used 411.com they gave me phone number, complete postal address and even a handy map. Google the person's name and you get everything else they've done on the 'net in the past couple decades. So curse facebook if you must, then back into the sand with that head...

  33. Privacy is the KILLER APP by lamapper · · Score: 1

    They can not release any personal information that you DO NOT PROVIDE to them.

    I too hate this crap, but too many people do not take privacy seriously and provided the information in the past, therefore, they (companies) have no reason not to expect you to follow and give them information like you have in the past. They believe we are all sheeple!

    Too many social networking sites want to lock you into bad OAuth sites, like Facebook, LinkedIn, etc. Too many people forget that as soon as they have any piece of information related to you and a single phone call, monthly bill, purchase, email account, etc, they know exactly who you are.

    Are you willing to stop using a site that violates your privacy? Most are not, therefore giving a nod to the company that wants to violate our privacy.

    Security and privacy go hand in hand. Privacy requires you to maintain a singular mind set to maintain your privacy and not get lazy. If you give up and provide the information because someone says you should not have anything to hide, its game over from a privacy perspective. Once you slip up and give out any private information, its just one small step from putting the pieces together and identifying who you are, what you are looking at in order to market to you. Of course who besides marketers are using this info for what other purposes will never be fully disclosed to you, ever.

    Our Credit information, another privacy sink, which contains all our personal information is too tightly inter-twined with our lives now, as if your credit determines what type of driver you are and should relate in any way to increasing the amount you pay for insurance. Pathetic.

    Is your browser secure? Can you tightly control not just regular cookies but Flash cookies as well? With Firefox + Linux (Banish Flash cookies forever under Linux) you can. Chrome is in bed with Adobe and Flash so they will never provide a viable option to delete tracking cookies. Internet Explorer was never meant to keep information about you private, ever. What other browsers let you delete Flash cookies on a regular basis? Even with Firefox, a reboot of my PC is required to delete the stupid Flash tracking cookies, but at least I can do that with Linux!

    In all cases, a company can not reveal what you do not provide to them. Do they really need your phone number? Really, REALLY, grow a pair and say NO! Where else might you get the info, there are always other options. Do they really need your email account info? Do they really need a credit card? There are always other options, granted some might not be as convenient, but they are out there if you are willing to expend the energy to seek them out.

    If you are not willing to spend some time to protect your privacy, than you are probably not reading this right now.

    While all sites should OPT OUT by DEFAULT, we know they do not and we know why. Of course you do not have to use that site! You have choices. If you only have two choices, you have no real choice. Sometimes you just have to say NO! Sometimes, as in this case, you have to say H8ll NO!

    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    1. Re:Privacy is the KILLER APP by cfalcon · · Score: 2
  34. This story is such a load of Horses#@t by DanTheCanadian · · Score: 1

    First, I am totally in favor of keeping my info that I've added to FB under the same privacy controls I used when I setup my profile. Unlike what most of the print/television media has reported, users aren't storing their SIN number's or credit card info within their Facebook profile, and I would hope as a user you wouldn't list your full proper home address on your FB profile page. So really what type of info could someone seriously gather from your profile (on a public website) if everything you had listed on there today was made public? The reason for my subject title, is it seems whenever its a slow news day the media will simply start a new defamatory story about some aspect of the FB privacy controls. Also, please try and remember that just like browsing the web, you dont simply just click on any pop up that comes your way. Why should adding applications to your FB page be any different? The "rogue applications mentioned in the article sound somewhat ominous, and one hopes users are somewhat intelligent and stick with the more well known and more mainstream applications (farmville/cityville/etc) when selecting which applications to add to their profile

  35. Re:But my connections place me in. by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 2

    The problem still is that you will STILL appear on facebook. Your friends and family will end up posting your pictures no matter how many times you remind them not to.

    Those same people will play farmville, take quizzes and use any other useless application, giving out their and, by proximity, your information.

    Even if I have no facebook account. Faceboook can still connect the dots and know sufficiently about me to merchandise, inspect, etc.

    Am I being overly paranoid? Maybe.

    --
    "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  36. Your friends tell on you...accidentally/on purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't even have a facebook profile... but facebook is tracking me via the friends who have invited me to join facebook via the same email address. Eventually facebook combines the information from two of my email addresses to get an even better idea of my social network.

    Of course, google is doing this in a multitude of ways as well with every website I visit that contains adwords, google analytics etc... all those free services they offer websites. See, they do get something out of it.

    The scary part is when Google and Facebook start ASKING YOUR FRIENDS ABOUT YOU. A big social faux-pas.. but on the internet maybe not so bad? Facebook already encourages this with face identification in pictures as does google ( who hides their face id because it's too spooky ). Check out face.com and tell me they aren't allowing paying customers more access to facebook face recognition over their database. If this was the government we'd be crying bloody murder... heck, maybe this is the government? Doesn't matter.. they can get access whenever they want.. or will eventually. Google and Facebook will fight publicly about it but higher powers will find a way ( as will criminal elements and spying countries).

    My concern is that I'm being left behind technologically and even socially by not buying in to the social networks. Heck, I hear companies are less likely to hire you if you aren't on Linked-in.

  37. Lots of FUD by nilbog · · Score: 1

    It seems like there is a lot of FUD going around about this and things like it. Facebook got its act together mostly on the privacy thing and if you actually take the time to configure your privacy it offers you very good control. It's also up front about what information is accesible to applications when you install them. Pretty much you just need to not install anything that you don't trust - it's no different than installing software on your computer.

    Personally I would like if everyone used Facebook for their contact information. That way my contacts stay up to date automatically on my phone. Just, again, be careful who you give that information to. I think they've struck a good balance between privacy and usability at this point.

    --
    or else!
    1. Re:Lots of FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's no different than installing software on your computer.

      Yes it is different, and I suspect you know that. On FaceBook, if your FRIENDS run applications, those applications that THEY run can slurp up your data from MY profile by default.

      Do you work for Facebook or a FB game company?

  38. Re:People really don't care about their informatio by Tranzistors · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he was giving his visiting card.

  39. This might be fairly obvious.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 0

    what the hell are you doing putting your address and phone number on Facebook in the first place?

    1. Re:This might be fairly obvious.... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2

      Why not? Can someone calmly explain to me what kind of BAD THING can happen if people know my phone number and home address?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  40. privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this would be why all of my info in there is false to begin with! Thank u ill take my privacy into my own hands. If I ever get on the p.o.s.

  41. The assumption is... by cephus440 · · Score: 1

    ... that the data will actually be removed vs archived or "marked as deleted". You should never have put that information out there to begin win. I'm relatively confident that in 10 years people will be wishing that they never signed up and updated FaceBook. Their past will haunt them... kinda like my old UseNet posts. Ah they days when all you had to do was hack a BBS and format the HD to remove all of your unflattering history were glorious.

  42. Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Facebook is getting too invasive. Every website that has a "like this" button can find out some information about you. Facebook probably knows more about your online habits than Google. They WILL sell this information, too. Unlike Google, they have no other interest in collecting it than to resell it to data miners. They have a history of not respecting your privacy.

    Don't put up with FB any more. Delete your account. Log in and go to this URL:

    http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account

    Clear out your facebook cookies to make sure that the deletion sticks (it will be reverted if you log in within two weeks, including via those websites that have FB widgets on them). I have done this and I am happier: I know my friends better. I have a fuller social life and I spend much less time on meta-socializing (all the things that go into organizing a social life, like FB). It is great.

    1. Re:Strike back and delete your account by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you aren't even a facebook user, you might want to add the antisocial subscription to adblock,
      since those little facebook icons are just as useless as the social bookmarking buttons of yore, but more viral.

    2. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need the adblock social filter list:
      https://monzta.maltekraus.de/adblock_social.txt

      Works with firefox and chromium

      That list alone has sped up many web pages that I visit.

    3. Re:Strike back and delete your account by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      hmmmm where'd u find that?, one week after i got facebook i only found the disable(but we will send endless spam, ENDLESS) option

      then i got dependent on it ;__;

      --
      warning pointless sig
    4. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really believed the tripe you just wrote, you wouldn't be wasting your time writing to strangers on Slashdot. Log out and go drink beer and pretend that makes you a better person, Mr. Holier Than Thou.

    5. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I dont really understand why so many facebook stories keep popping up on /.

      Many of us got rid of facebook long ago.

    6. Re:Strike back and delete your account by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If you aren't even a facebook user, you might want to add the antisocial subscription [adblockplus.org] to adblock,
      since those little facebook icons are just as useless as the social bookmarking buttons of yore, but more viral.

      As a Facebook non-user, those little icons serve a valuable purpose. They help me identify which websites to never visit again.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    7. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is getting too invasive. Every website that has a "like this" button can find out some information about you. Facebook probably knows more about your online habits than Google. They WILL sell this information, too. Unlike Google, they have no other interest in collecting it than to resell it to data miners. They have a history of not respecting your privacy.

      Don't put up with FB any more. Delete your account. Log in and go to this URL:

      http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account

      Clear out your facebook cookies to make sure that the deletion sticks (it will be reverted if you log in within two weeks, including via those websites that have FB widgets on them). I have done this and I am happier: I know my friends better. I have a fuller social life and I spend much less time on meta-socializing (all the things that go into organizing a social life, like FB). It is great.

      They don't delete your profile no matter what you do, it's there forever. A better option is to just update all the personal info you submitted to something random or silly. Give them Pizza Hut's phone number, the address of the public library, for your high school use a grade school, etc.

      But you really shouldn't have filled all that crap out in the first place unless you wanted people calling you and showing up at your house randomly. I never gave them any real information other than my name and current city, and my middle name is intentionally spelled wrong so I can tell what businesses happen to buy up that list.

      Boycotting FB is only HALF the solution. You also need to boycott all the businesses who BUY that data from them.

    8. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am glad to see the word antisocial to appear in this thread.

    9. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - good to know - what *I* actually want is a script that not only blocks each and every Facebook script/icon/WhateverTF, but one which also makes it clear to the site operators - "I AM BLOCKING THIS BECAUSE ITS INVASIVE SHIT - GET THIS CRAP OFFA YOUR SITE!"

      For the record, FB recommends, I dont mind, however, there are some seriously major sites (parts of CNN, for instance) where you can only comment via FB. I mean, WTF is that all about?!
       

    10. Re:Strike back and delete your account by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 2

      If you aren't even a facebook user, you might want to add the antisocial subscription [adblockplus.org] to adblock, since those little facebook icons are just as useless as the social bookmarking buttons of yore, but more viral.

      As a Facebook non-user, those little icons serve a valuable purpose. They help me identify which websites to never visit again.

      So . . . is this "goodbye, Slashdot?"

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  43. It's been pestering me for that information too by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Now I know why it has been pestering me for that information lately. "$Number of your friends live in $City, [Click to make $City your hometown] [Not your hometown? What is?]"

  44. In the words of the great Zuckerberg himself... by blind+biker · · Score: 1
    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  45. Re:But my connections place me in. by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

    I took out a Facebook account, but made it in the name of our family pet. Nobody needs to know you are a dog on the Internet.

  46. anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is time, past time actually, for some of you outraged coders to "put your money (skills) where your mouth is." A program, something simple, delayed action, that corrupts random data over the entire DBase. Make Facebook, and Zuckermans' empire, unreliable and and useless to marketers. Something with staying power, that can replicate and transfer as a trojan, to the purchasers DBases. Something toxic.

  47. OK... by WillyWanker · · Score: 4, Informative

    OK, do we need to go over this again? Any information that you wouldn't write on a giant poster and hang up in a public place should NOT be in Facebook. Period.

  48. Re:Actually get the info by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hi. This is 2 years from now. You gave us the missing piece of the puzzle to narrow down which Billy Smith you are. Now the game changes completely.

    Regards, Marketers in 2012

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  49. Good luck... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 1

    This is why I always use:

    1060 W. Addison Street, Chicago, Illinois 60613

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  50. Yeah, Great Idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF are they smoking? How does this benefit anyone at all? There is no reason whatsoever that any strangers would need this info, especially other companies. They already can pinpoint me to a general area from my ip if I don't bother with trying to cover myself. This to me is a breech as big as someone finding credit card numbers. Yeah I may be in the phone book but there are a lot of people in the phone book. This points a big bulls-eye right on you specfically.

    probably wouldn't matter if you did remove your personal information anyways, doesn't facebook have an M.O. of keeping user info even if they delete their information.

  51. Contact Info Sharing is Optional by REggert · · Score: 1

    If any of you had bothered to read TFA, you'd notice that sharing your address and phone number is entirely optional for the user on a per-app basis. They just split the "Request for Permission" dialog into two options instead of one: 1. Access my basic information (the only option up until now) and 2. Access my contact information. Why anyone would actually choose the second option is beyond me (maybe they anticipate someone developing some sort of app that sends notifications via text messages), but it's not as if they're forcing you to share the information, or even making it likely that you'd accidentally share it.

    --

    cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

  52. Re:Broadcast by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    "But you want to connect with everyone! And there was no way to do that before!"

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  53. phone book for mobile #'s by kiore · · Score: 2
    Strangely enough there used to be which is why to this day my mobile has a confidential, unlisted number.

    Sometime around 1993 to 1995 I bought my first mobile. The telephone company had this weird idea of publishing a paper white pages directory of mobile numbers and as in their minds mobiles were only for business use back then wanted me to pay to be in this directory.

    When I said I wasn't prepared to pay the nice lady at the phone company call centre discovered that the only way to drop me from this directory was to make my phone confidential & unlisted where it stays to this day.

    This means caller-id doesn't work on voice calls, but does show up on text messages. I suppose one day there could be a negative to this but until then I can't be bothered spending an hour on hold to have it done.

    BTW I don't have the same phone, nor exactly the same number but somehow the setting always transfers

  54. sociopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the word your looking for. Sweats under difficult questions, cold emotionless responses during interviews, lots of public comments showing he doesn't care one bit if his company directly or indirectly causes harm.

  55. I have all my information in Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so I'm really getting a kick out of these replies.

  56. Sharing is optional. Just like iPhone apps. by dusqi · · Score: 1

    Users have to agree to a specific extended permission. A box will pop up that says 'Do you want to share your phone number and address with this application?' and then you say yes or no. If you don't want to share your location, as the summary implies, just don't click yes. Problem solved. This is a non-story that is only on Slashdot because it has decided that Facebook is bad. I don't see a similar story about iPhone applications where you can choose to (*shock horror*) share your current location obtained by GPS! Quick, everyone stamp on your iPhones!

  57. Why is this news? by alexmin · · Score: 1

    FB was started with 'They just trust me. Dumb fucks.' attitude. Same sleazebag is still in charge.

  58. It's not like a telephone directory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a privacy story, and the arguments fall along the three levels of sophistication:

    • Level 1. This is bad! Everybody abandon Facebook, they're selling us out.
    • Level 2 addresses the previous argument: This is good (or at best neutral). You shouldn't have put the info out there in the first place, and anyway, we have telephone directories.

    The above two are pretty well represented already! So let's crank things up:

    • Level 3 addresses the previous argument. It's not about what information is out there, it's about making it easier to link it up with all the other bits of information about you.

    Previously, a business could indeed get your phone number and address... by looking it up in a telephone directory. A manual process, or at best, a not-too-reliable automated process.

    They could also get your friends list, through a not-too-reliable automated process (scraping Facebook, or inferring it from what your friends have said about you). If that was worth anything to them.

    They could buy a copy of your ad viewing preferences and buying preferences, from marketers. And of course they could get generalised data on your demographic.

    It's when a business can get all of the above, and correlate it with each other on an accurate and automated basis, that things start getting scary.

    Once they have your address, they can turn it into a long/lat and get a picture of your home from Google Street View. They can get a list of your wi-fi networks. And probably other interesting things - also on an accurate and automated basis. Back in the day when information was hard to acquire, it wasn't worth it. And granted, even today it still may not serve a business purpose. But now this stuff is easy to piece together...

    Don't get me wrong: they could do all these things before; it was just prohibitively difficult. Every time Facebook does something like described today, the bar gets lowered...

  59. Why bother... by Restil · · Score: 1

    I could mention the utter pointlessness of putting phone numbers and addresses on facebook to begin with, no matter how private you have it, because everyone who's already your super duper bestest friends probably already have that information. But apparently you can't make sense out of human nature. People can instruct their children time and again to not take candy from strangers, but as soon as the icecream truck rolls by, hoardes of kids come chasing it down. Well, of course we don't mean THAT stranger.. we mean all the OTHER strangers. Of course, on facebook, who's really a stranger? If you have 1000 facebook "friends", how many of those are really FRIENDS. In fact, how many of them do you really know at all? Yet you freely fork over your personal details to those people... because they're "friends".

    So what does it really matter if facebook is going to introduce one more potentially privacy threatening interface? The people who would be affected by it don't really care much about their privacy anyway. Everyone else is smart enough to not HAVE any private contact information on there in the first place. So.. yeah.. carry on. Nothing to see here.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  60. Fun Times by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    Why take all the fun out of life? Having strangers turn up at your house knowing everything about you just adds spice to life!

  61. Really? by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've spent the afternoon working with the Facebook API.

    As far as I can tell you can only get this information if the user specifically allows you access to it.

    If you have a sample of code that gets around this, please post.

    Otherwise, STFU.

    1. Re:Really? by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt that is true, but I would bet the vast majority of FB users have never even looked at their privacy settings, and almost anyone that uses apps just blindly clicks 'Allow' when that little confirmation box pops up...

  62. do your friends scrub geotags from their jpgs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just because you don't post things that compromize your security, doesn't mean these things don't get posted...

    Remember that Adam Savage thing?

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/12/technology/personaltech/12basics.html

    Well, he finally turned off geotagging, but this image could have just as easily been taken by his friend and posted to facebook and the photo tagged with his name.

    I don't even have a facebook account and all my friends seem to tag me in their photos anyhow. There's not much I can do about this.

    Ahh the wonders of a fully hyperlinked facebook...

    1. Re:do your friends scrub geotags from their jpgs? by syousef · · Score: 1

      It takes significant effort or luck to stumble upon my location, but if you're that determined there are easier ways (like going through the phone book....ever seen Terminator? Sarah Conors???....)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  63. You are not Facebook's customer... by ivec · · Score: 2

    There is one simple thing to keep in mind: the real customer that Facebook cares for is not you, but the advertisers. They are the ones who bring revenue to them.

    What you get is some web pages to play with, in exchange of the personal information and eyeball time that you give to their paying customers.

  64. Dislike by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

    Where do I click "dislike" exactly...

    --
    Just another ignorant American.
  65. Wonderful by McTickles · · Score: 0

    I am so glad we all get our asses fucked by Mr Suckerberg enormous iPenis...

    FFS WHEN WILL PEOPLE WAKE UP AND REALIZE THEY ARE BEING FUCKED OVER AND OVER BY iCorporates...

    --
    www.twilightcampaign.net

  66. Go visit your friends and delete your fb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha

    Heres an idea people instead of looking at your friends on facebook, go visit them in real life and then you can talk to them and dlete all your shit on facebook.

    hth

  67. Uh...don't put your address and phone # on FB...? by steelersteve13 · · Score: 0

    Unless you want "Them" to find you.

    --
    Can my karma get any worse than bad? Let's find out!
  68. Re:Actually get the info by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Interesting sig. I reckon the history is a bit like this:

    • Web 1.0: Organisations provide most content, enthusiasts the rest
    • Web 1.1: Better ways to find that content evolve (search engines)
    • Web 1.5: Individuals provide content (MySpace, personal home pages, blogging)
    • Web 2.0: Sites gets interactive (blog comments, user-submitted content drives news sites like Slashdot)
    • Web 2.5: Interaction generalises to social networks
    • Web 3.0 (today): Social networks become platforms, ecosystems build around them (Twitter tools, social games, "share this" links on blog posts, portable ID)

    I suspect that it will actually be people tiring of trivial comments and false relationships that brings down the current generation of social networks, but if the bad guys start exploiting all the privacy holes then that might see a move to more open, encrypted platforms first. In the long run, I suspect the social aspect will become much more distributed and personal, and centralised web sites will go back to being driven more by expert, or at least editorially controlled, content, rather than just repeating every little contribution from every user, spammer and troll under the sun.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  69. Mod parent up. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  70. Just wait... by froggymana · · Score: 1

    Next facebook will want everyone's credit card number, so you easily log in to other sites to buy stuff with your facebook. Can you say facebook's version of paypal?

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  71. I'm living in a stalkers paradise by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    It was a past time paradise but then it became a gangsters paradise but Al made it an Amish paradise so now I'm in a stalkers paradise. So now I'm living in a stalkers paradise where eye color, hair color, body type, blood type, name, address, phone number, IM handle and bust size are readily available to the erstwhile stalker. I suppose next Facebook will put up a handy app to allow you to specify who you will stalk and make it easy with an integrated Greyhound bus schedule.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  72. Feh, by markass530 · · Score: 1

    if anyone stole my id they'd be begging me to take it back within the week

  73. And that's not the worst by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    The worst is: people I know, uploading *my* data to Facebook to sync their addressbook against. I don't even have a f*cking facebook account and can do nothing against it. We will all pay dearly for this.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  74. that's what you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might post that something is going on in the area I live in, but I don't post street address or GPS co-ordinates or phone numbers.

    ... so FB gets your IP address, instead, runs it via a location service, then get your current location anyway... FB just turned your "useless shit" into gold.

    1. Re:that's what you think... by syousef · · Score: 1

      I might post that something is going on in the area I live in, but I don't post street address or GPS co-ordinates or phone numbers.

      ... so FB gets your IP address, instead, runs it via a location service, then get your current location anyway... FB just turned your "useless shit" into gold.

      IP addresses to suburb, maybe...but to exact GPS co-ordinates? This isn't the movie "The NET" and I'm not Sandra Bollocks.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:that's what you think... by fremsley471 · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of people here that seem to see Lamebook as FB normality. Came across FB when some students said they'd posted field trip pictures on there ("Where?"). Was shocked by the amount and openness of info the undergrads had supplied - as well as open profiles, they had mobile phone numbers, even their room number in a residential halls. My favourite was the serious tutee, who enquired of me just how she could take extra courses, had a profile picture of her puffing on a bong.

      But that was 2006, as by 2008 it was thankfully long-gone. The bong-hitting student had nothing but her name visible, no-one had an open-profile, everything was locked-down. People read the "employers check your FB profile" news, they friended their relations, they saw the "FB Killer" stories. Whilst there will always been stupid people, the vast majority understand on-line privacy worries and, at least in my circle, you're absolutely right, it's nothing more than a 'social network'. The only real task is to make sure children understand this - man, I'd hate to be growing up now with cyber-bullying- you're not even 'safe' at home.

  75. SSNs and Mother's maiden names by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    If Facebook offered a "pro" version of the site with free extras (like bonus cheats for Farmville and other FB games), and the only condition was the user input their SSN and mother's maiden name, I'd venture to guess that plenty of FB users would sadly go along with it, even if the privacy settings to hide those two elements were added.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  76. I've raped my friends by buying new android by tkprit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ya'll blame FB, but I think I'm tossing Google in the "bad guys" column for now because it was the GOOGLE phone book which, um, "raped" my FB friends' accounts without asking. (Wait for it:)

    New android phone yesterday (HTC Incred., Froya build, not rooted yet), I sign in with Google which is okay (or *was*). That shit knew one of my facebooks! Asked me to log in; I didn't. I went online with laptop to Google Accounts, and it's got some "suggestions" of FB and other accounts that MAY be mine. (I'm still considering major deletion of Google incl. Gmail, plus FB; not sure what to do).

    Today I use the HTC Facebook app and log in, thinking it was separate from the Android, but I guess FB can "talk to" Google apps? — and my PHONE CONTACTS list was suddenly, um, ENHANCED. Noted, some phone contacts I had addresses and other info (not birthdays, etc), but now my phone contacts are all LINKED to their facebook accounts, and I've got phone contacts I didn't have before.

    Noted, I haven't had much time to investigate this, because I feel like I've RAPED my FB friends. (I'm ACTIVELY working on this w/ my most paranoid friends first.)

    I never put my private stuff on FB accts, EVER, even the 'real' emergency FB acct one with only a few family members as friends — they KNOW how to contact me. And my phone number hasn't [yet?] been added to FB. But now, my Android phone book contacts include FB frends that weren't on my phone originally, and my phone contacts have more information (their FB stuff, I guess) that I didn't enter on my own.

    Now maybe it is the FB app (which came with the Android phone) that allowed for this; or user error (I'm new to Android); but I'm messaging the affected FB friends that either they remove what they don't want public, or adjust the privacy settings. My BEST advice is what I read above: delete FB. I'm contacting Verizon tomorrow with some complaints about privacy; even if FB puts it out, their android phones with pre-installed apps like FB shouldn't grab it (esp not without my express approval).

    1. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by arkhan_jg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Android only grabs information your friends have already made available to you. You can go any view any of those phone numbers manually on facebook.com when you're logged in. You're correct to warn friends that they are publishing a phone number, if you know they wouldn't want it published. This isn't android's fault though, it's just collecting the information your friends have made available to you on facebook.

      Google 'knows' about your facebook account because you're presumably putting some information on your public profile; it looks at facebook account names, compares them to your google account name, and takes a guess at a match. It's trying to be helpful! I find adding facebook data to my phone quite handy, as there's contacts on there (with say, email addresses) that update their information when it changes, I don't have to update it manually my end. It also syncs with the calendar for birthdays, etc.

      Note - it's a one way sync. Android (and google) don't put any of your google contacts into facebook. They just pull information from your logged in account to combine with your phone contacts. It doesn't copy any of it to your google contacts or phone contacts, it keeps them separate. It does auto show facebook contacts and google/phone contacts together when they have the same name. You can turn *that* off under the contacts settings, and you'll see them as entirely separate lists.

      If you want to turn off the facebook integration, just goto settings/accounts and remove the facebook sync account you have there. That's what's linking your phone to facebook.

      I don't know about the HTC app, but the samsung one that came with my phone uses the underlying android facebook sync. So when you logged into the facebook app, you gave it permission to well, connect to your facebook profile. Facebook do have their own official app and widget in the android market - IIRC, it does also autosync with contacts and calendar, but you can turn that off and still use the app.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    2. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      Noted, I haven't had much time to investigate this, because I feel like I've RAPED my FB friends. (I'm ACTIVELY working on this w/ my most paranoid friends first.)

      Oh your most paranoid friends on FB?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxymoron

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by robably · · Score: 1
    4. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by tkprit · · Score: 1

      Well to be completely fair, a few of them were sort of forced to open a Facebook account against their wishes due to the organization we serve; the head honcho decided it was easier to distribute information via Facebook than email, and the 'yeas' won the day.

      I found out one [the most paranoid] used false information anyway, heh heh. But others didn't, and some even thought they had to fill in ALL the optional info (so as not to piss off the committee) and trusted Facebook's privacy policy (MAJOR FAIL) to keep their info safe.

      These people are generally older than me by 20yrs and not-technically-inclined (to say the least). I was one of the "nays" for requiring FB accounts, and I hope now they see why. We have a meeting coming up this week, and I'm using this article in an impress (powerpoint), and my physical phone as a demonstration, to try to garner the votes to strike the amendment.

    5. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by tkprit · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info; I took your advice! I feel better about google right now, but I'm going to read through their policies real carefully from now on. (Funny they linked me to blogs and youtube accts that weren't mine, but I see your point about them trying to be helpful, and I can say it's not mine, so that's cool.)

      And I admit I liked that my insanely complicated google calendar was automatically on my phone; that was sweet (would love that widget for desktop). A few other apps weren't bad, either... just mainly the FB thing just blew my mind.

      The HTC phone came loaded down with bloatware — I had 3 FB apps pre-installed and several twitter apps and widgets, plus tons of stuff I'd never use. I grabbed an app to help me get rid of a lot of that bloatware and kill tasks that won't go away (like "City ID"?), and will root the thing this weekend. (Srsly, don't know if it's Verizon or HTC, but I've got some startup apps that are trials and keep bugging me to buy them. Rooting is going to be a *must*. Who knew bloatware would be worse on phone than on laptop!)

      I'm joining some android forums and getting informed, that's for sure :)

    6. Re:I've raped my friends by buying new android by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      My condolences, thats one sucky organisation!

      Is the fact that Facebook have the right to make commercial use of anything posted on Facebook not enough of a deterrent?

      Ie any company information posted on Facebook, regardless of privacy settings, is now effectively Facebook IP.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  77. So glad by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    ...my address has always been "VAN! DOWN BY THE RIVER!" on Facebook.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
  78. What will piss me off immensely.... by lewko · · Score: 1

    Is "friends" who give away my privacy by adding my private details to their own Facebook account (or whatever).

    It's like those who click on the "Send this page to a friend" button on a web page and volunteer my private details to a third-party.

    I don't have a Facebook account and take my privacy quite seriously. However it is increasingly threatened by careless morons. AKA my friends and family.

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    1. Re:What will piss me off immensely.... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      God you're a whiner. Your email address is no more a secret than your phone number.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  79. Facebook is Malware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all there is to it.

  80. Another reason why being a moron sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you posted your home address on FB you're an idiot and you deserve to be tracked down and publicly humiliated. Then again I can't talk...I'm homeless.

  81. It's a preemptive cleanup scheme by UBfusion · · Score: 1

    It looks like a preemptive cleanup scheme to me, as follows:

    FB users starting to get worried by the increasing invasion of their privacy or intimidated by the media warning them they'd better leave or frightened by the stories they hear from their friends will eventually close their accounts. Such users are useless to FB and currently represent a waste of storage space and FB resources. So why not force them out as soon as possible with little bumps of scare tactics and just do business with the rest hundreds of millions who will sheepishly share their every dirty little secret online?

    Sounds like a plausible strategy to me - cheap, effective and certainly increasing the percentage of marketable private information per Terabyte of storage.

  82. Can't delete the account: becomes inactive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you can do is create another throw-away eMail address, move yout FaceBook to that throw-away eMail address, change the registration information of FaceBook Registration to match that throw-away eMail address, then un-register. Here's the kicker: let the throw-away eMail address expire, then go to FaceBook to pretend to be an Arab trying to recover that throw-away eMail address and FaceBook Account because it's on your throw-away eMail address that was picked-up by your fictitious Arab. Then the Arab contacts FaceBook to get a restraining order against your real name from ever being confused as your real name; get one of those prepaid Visa Vanilla Debit Cards to order some cheap cornmash and goats from some Tack and Feed shop deliverable to some Congressman in Washington DC courtesy of the Arab that wants you dead for trying to register him on his behalf. Maybe you can even pretend some of your College Debt was actually from the Arab, so make sure he gets a bus ticket to Mexico that FaceBook tracks him as leaving the country. And finally, you can feel vindicated that the albino Arab closes the account...or else he'll slash your tires, not you!

  83. Turn off all platform apps... by beaverdownunder · · Score: 1

    Account --> Account Settings --> Privacy --> Apps and Websites --> Turn off platform apps. Easy done. (I hope... but you never know with FB...)

  84. really whats the problem ? by Torvac · · Score: 1

    you voluntarily give away your private information to some company that is making profit with user data, and complain when they make money with your data ? you all shot your own foot and comlain about it now, laughable really.

  85. Poison profile information by losttoy · · Score: 1

    Why hide or delete personal information? Instead, fill all those fields with rubbish. Each one these sites that ask for all sorts of personal information like DoB, Schools, Work places, IM handles, Blog URLs, Home town, home address etc. Fill out each profile on every site in as much detail as you can. Only use your real name. Everything else should be borrowed. Next time a marketer buy *your* profile information, they will get junk. Anyone who Google's you will get five different people with your name who actually do not exist (if you fill out all info on five different sites like FB, flickr, MySpace etc). Make sure you fill out different information on each site. Spread the information geographically as much as possible so like you were born in Ethiopia, studied in Russia, worked in France and now live in Japan. For work places, pick companies that are now bankrupt and liquidated.

  86. i fail to see the privacy issue .. by hpoul · · Score: 1

    ... it seems i'm too dumb for this discussion .. 3rd party applications can access your phone number and home address if you explicitly give this one application permission to do so... what is the big deal? the applications can't access those informations from friends of the users or from existing users.. just from users who give them permissions

    --
    Find me at http://herbert.poul.at
    1. Re:i fail to see the privacy issue .. by smylingsam · · Score: 1

      The big issue is that if you "Trust" an application before the change, the application is grandfathered in -- it's granted this access without your knowledge. I cant yet tell if an application can increase it's trust level (after this change) or not.

    2. Re:i fail to see the privacy issue .. by hpoul · · Score: 1

      i really doubt that.. applications always request specific permissions - since they weren't able to previously request the user_address and user_mobile_phone permissions the application will have to request these permissions also from existing users.

      --
      Find me at http://herbert.poul.at
  87. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, or just stop to use stupid apps.

  88. Re:Sophos: "New level of danger for Facebook users by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    Come to think of it, we should petition to remove "Share on Facebook" from the sharethis widgets! I bet they get too much income (read:payoffs) that side to even consider it though.

  89. very silly discussion by drfireman · · Score: 1

    Facebook is no more evil this week than it was last. According to the article, apps can now request access to your private info. When an app requests your ifno, you can say yes or no. If you trust facebook to implement this as stated (one poster has already tried it and found it to be as described), then what's the big deal? Apps could also just ask you for your social security number, or your credit card numbers, this just makes it easier for users who were going to be agreeable. Who cares? And if you don't trust facebook, then you don't have private information on there anyway. So again, what's the big deal? This is a complete non-story that's been escalated into some kind of scare story by people who can't read.

  90. When will people realize Facebook is no good? by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    It's a rotting cesspool of depravity, where bottom feeders prey upon the users (ie: Zynga games) and where the master (Facebook itself) is constantly shifting the ground around and NEVER to the user's benefit.

    I've never used Facebook and I never will. They won't be able to give out my information to the highest bidder because they don't HAVE it in the first place.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  91. Re:Sophos: "New level of danger for Facebook users by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    How about a petition to remove the Facebook 'like' buttons from the Slashdot front page? I cringe a little every time I see them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  92. I was wondering.. by anyGould · · Score: 1

    ... why Facebook was suddenly after my phone number for "security purposes".

  93. They are going far by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Into the future, I see facebook
    1) tying all info of personal nature for someone together, where the gov. failed to do so...
          imagine if you could tie in all your personal data, so you only need to access one point to get to it.
    medical records, drivers license passport, etc..etc..
    then you would only need your facebook id and also a terminal to access it, and you coudl even add in your retinal scan and fingerprints

    2) making a one stop place for all info instead of too many places for many diff. things.
          all gov. and country agencies, would go to facebook for all sorts of info...maybe not the bad stuff( or maybe even so...)
          cops go there for your fingerprints, banks go there for your info when they need to see who you are...
          customs agents would go there to see your travel history and also your passport id
    etc...

    3) eliminating identity theft using a public sector as means of proof to peronality and identity.
        If everything si there, even your cell phone no and address, then nothing is private, then no one can copy you as you are already visible to the world, identity theft is only possible if there can be doubt as to who the person looks like, or
    what there signature is, if all this is already on facebook, and when you go apply for a loan, facebook tied into the banks system, they would see the person is not who they are intending to be, where as today, so many fraud theft are happening because the info is just not there...

    4) Security, if facebook got to the point, i think they are aiming for, then they would x4 in value if not more, i am sure they could come up with a very secure way of regulating the data, even from hackers on the inside, say a journal is done every
    month, and logged somewhere, then any changes are flagged for point checks later, then if someones picture has changed and say a facial recognition software analyses that the changes are too great (someone adding a picture to change the original for a scam or identity theft or something) then they could send an email to the admins who would then contact that person etc....the possibilities are endless!

  94. Common Sense - but the net is already confusing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To many people the internet is nothing more than a complicated computing environment where they only know how to use Facebook, send e-mails, and click on "congratulations" pop-ups at wack-a-mole speed. These internet users see that their friends and family are connected to them online and assume that it's there own private network -- Facebook's privacy settings can be pretty good when used properly - but they're still too confusing for the general public. Either way, no matter how good Facebook's privacy controls can be - it is still a business entity at the end of the day - and the bottom line is that you are of no use to the company (Facebook) if you can't help them reach their business objectives in some way. In fact, nothing is "private" on the web unless you own the server that your data is getting stored on ... and even still - you're at risk of having your data accessed by cunning techies.

    This is a pretty cool article introducing the long-term risks of large-scale social networking websites: http://www.machetemag.com/large-scale-public-social-networking-websites-are-long-term-risks-to-user-safety/

  95. Reduced FB after it required Mobile Number by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    I used to spend more time on FB. Used a desktop, laptop, iphone. Played zynga games. Did the various "Here I am at such and such" updates.

    Then one day, I got this pink alert that said, "You need to enter your mobile phone number and we will send you a text with a validation number. Until then, your account is frozen."

    Knowing FB's privacy issues and lacking a convenient throw down phone (I did try the google phone but it didn't work), I simply dropped the account and started a new one.

    I use it a lot less. Since I lost all Zynga game progress, I stopped playing Zynga games. I posted on Zynga and got about 160 responses from others who had the same thing happen to them.

    Apparently multiple people using the same IP address (a common family situation) sets this off- perhaps in combination with Zynga games. FB desires to have a hard identification to a real person behind each account. That would make the accounts more valuable to sell as information.

    I cut my FB usage to 20-30 minutes a week. Mainly reading up on friend's status and posting a simple text status occasionally. Not going to invest in something that can be taken away at any time. Not going to give FB my mobile number or real address.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  96. Re:People really don't care about their informatio by Elbereth · · Score: 1

    So am I too paranoid or are people too careless?

    Both?

    Anyways, it's not like you're paranoid, unless it's actively affecting your life negatively. If you're happy with your life and not having any problems, then you're doing fine. No need to worry about about being too private or paranoid or anything.

    I generally use a different username on every site, but there's occasionally a bit of overlap (eg, using the same name in an online game and its forums). Sometimes I reuse a favorite username, too. I don't really care if a site (or its users) know my gender, age, or city. After that, I start getting a bit miffed, such as race (wtf? why do you need to know if I'm white, black, or asian?), employment, salary, zip code, etc. If a site asks me any of those questions, I usually just cancel the signup process and find something less invasive.

    Depending on my mood, I may even add IM or e-mail, like I have on slashdot. I don't care if Slashdotters contact me, as long as they don't call me on the phone. I'd like to think that they'd have something interesting to say, if they did contact me, unlike most people. Plus, you never know when you'll pique someone's interest and develop a genuine friendship. It's very rare, but it does happen.

    I guess it can be boiled down to: if you're a human, I don't mind if you know my private details, but I do not want to be cataloged or made into a statistic, unless I'm getting a cut of the money you make from using my details.

  97. Re:People really don't care about their informatio by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I usually continue with the registration, always keeping in mind "what information will cause the least or at least the easiest to identify spam".

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  98. Laff by koan · · Score: 1

    Were you really ignorant enough to put that info into Facebook?

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    1. Re:Laff by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      I won't, but I found it curious that Facebook recently attempted to convince me that I needed to add my home address and phone number to my profile to "make my account more secure."

  99. Look yourself up on Spokeo.com by ukemike · · Score: 1

    Spokeo trolls the internet looking for accounts for everyone. It collects the publicly available information about you and puts it in their directory. You may find that it publishes your address, phone number, pictures from online accounts, income, work address, a street view pic of your home, the value of your home, etc. Look yourself up, then when you are shocked by how much it knows about you, remove yourself by searching your name, copy the URL of your page, then go to the bottom right corner of the page and click on the Privacy button to remove yourself.

    --
    -- QED
  100. But... why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To anyone who is seriously concerned about this, there is one thing that beats me... why on earth would you want to put your phone number and home address on facebook?

  101. mod parent "funny / outdated +1" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lmao'd

  102. ATTENTION LOSERS by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Why would you type your home address into a social networking site anyway? Facebook is a tool, not an evil parasite. It can't do anything with info you don't give it. Wah wah wah wah, all the way home.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  103. Microwave Cooking Is Fun! by scurvyj · · Score: 0

    I microwaved my FuckedBook some time ago.

    Set everything to false information and left it that way for a while till it was baked.

    Since I had moved house and some other details had changed too, the timing was very opportune.

    Picking the apps off was a slow process, they are worse than lice.

    Then I deleted everything.

    Then I dug through the instructions and told the account to delete itself.

    Several months (yes months, as in those things with 4 weeks in them) later, I checked on it and it was indeed dead.

    The data is archived somewhere in Fuckedbook's vaults but at least it is misleading and noisy now, and not accessible to the outside world.


    If you insist on using that piece of garbage javascript monstrosity, then I strongly urge you to falsify all information on it. Including photographs.

  104. Spammers can have my address, I don't care by daveking · · Score: 1

    I just updated it:

    1; DROP DATABASE 'mysql';

    --
    ------DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE------