I think they will unless whatever state they use for legal jurisdiction says they can't. The main reason being that there's no profit for them in having dead accounts and it looks really bad refusing lawful requests.
Yes, but doing that takes longer than if they're provided with a list of criteria along with a scoring guide. It's not ideal, but it gives more time between adjustments and having to make a new adjustment because somebody has it figured out.
I gave up on Ubuntu when I switched to a bluetooth keyboard and found I couldn't log in without plugging in a second keyboard. I would've given them a pass on that if bluetooth were a new technology, but that was well within the last year.
I expect this sort of thing out of developer previews or on an unstable release, but for that to behave in that manner on a full release is asking a bit much. Likewise I think that it's foolhardy to decide to switch to Waypoint when it isn't completed yet. A better idea for a mainstream distro would be to wait until it firms up before making a decision. Sure it could be great, but do we really need another case where somebody found some cool technology then blindly integrated it only to find that it didn't live up to the hype?
Precisely, as confusing as the nomenclature can be, it's a client server model which doesn't require the client and the server to be on the same box. And yes indeed it's been that way for a really long time. It's not perfect, but you can do things like tunnel the connection over SSH or if you really want some other protocol. I suppose if you wanted to you could even tunnel it into a virtual machine.
The question though ultimately is whether or not it's better than some of the other techniques that people have used. But for Waypoint to completely neglect it is shortsighted to say the least.
There's no requirement that you do it on a small scale. Which was always one of the complaints. There's little to no difference in the DMCA between commercial and non-profit violations. But this isn't a violation of any part of the DMCA that I'm aware of. You still need the SIM card in order to access the network and unlocking the phone isn't going to change that. This just allows you to use a SIM card from a different carrier.
You're being dense. Nullification is the whole reason why we have an independent judicial branch.
Nullification is what happens when SCOTUS rules a law to be unconstitutional. Unless of course I've missed the cases where SCOTUS rules something to be unconstitutional and the law stays legally binding. What you're arguing is semantics as any law that's ruled to be unconstitutional is unconstitutional unless SCOTUS issues a new precedent or test that indicates otherwise.
Except that you're being judgmental and lacking any comprehension about what's going on. The reason why Wikileaks needs to be in the press is that many people who have information that they'd like to leak are unaware of how to go about it. Sure there are other methods of doing it, but that makes precisely zero difference if the people wanting to leak the material don't know about it.
What I'd like to know is whether you're being deliberately obtuse or are just trying to tow the line that Wikileaks is bad because some news program told you it is.
You do realize that a lot of the countries in Africa are majority Muslim, right? There's a particularly strong Muslim population in the portion of Africa that covers the Sahara. So, this wouldn't solve your problem at all. But then again little would seeing as you're a bigoted moron.
No it wouldn't. What's destabilizing Africa at this point is corrupt politicians and other government officials. Providing a huge pot of cash isn't going to help that. The assumption you're making only applies when it's incompetence causing the problems rather than corruption. If it were just incompetence that would eventually solve itself, all they'd have to do is ask for help from the outside world. With corruption there is an incentive to keep the people out that might threaten your cash stream.
Not really, these days the patent office is so understaffed that I'd be surprised if they were giving anything a thorough review. In the past they would take the information from the patent and actually build it. These days I doubt very much that they bother unless there's something obviously fishy with it. And rarely if ever with tech patents. Otherwise they'd realize that a lot of these patents are bunk.
And previous to recent changes people didn't see a problem with a lack of that color deal in the URL bar of their browser showing that the cite was being access via SSL either. The way you handle that is education, and things like that which are simple are more likely to be used. The real problem with that is if an attacker manages to screw with the hash function to support an exception for certain files.
Indeed, Wikileaks at least in theory ought to be protected under the 1st amendment protection for the press. Now, the individuals making the leaks on the other hand are unlikely to be so covered, which is why the press normally has the ability to refuse to name sources in countries which care about democracy. Any journalist that wants to remain a journalist is going to keep his or her mouth shut about sources as naming one can effectively end his or her career. Especially if it's a major story and the source gets into trouble over it.
Citation necessary. Double jeopardy applies to trials that are completed where the jury decides to acquit. The defense is able to ask for another trial when found guilty. Additionally, it's been considered not to be a violation for trials to be retried at a different level of government or over different charges that cover the same actions for quite some time.
I don't personally care for it because it seems to be an end run around that particular protection, but it is established precedent and there's no reason to believe that it won't be upheld in the future.
Most platformers and most FPS game suck. But there's enough of a volume that you end up with plenty of good ones to play. Sort of like how most puzzle games suck, and well most games in general suck, but there's a large enough volume that you can always find at least a few games in the genre worth playing.
I haven't read the patent, but it appears to be far more than just what you're describing. What they've done is hooked it up to a computer which can apparently adjust the effect based upon the location of the viewers in the room. Which is in and of itself worthy of a patent if they've succeeded in doing so.
No it doesn't. From the description in the article Apple has something much more sophisticated. It apparently is smart enough to know where the individuals are sitting and makes accommodations for that. Rather than requiring an individual to sit in a particular place like all the other systems like this do. If they've managed to pull that off, I'll have to be the first one to tip my hat to their innovation. And I'm rare to do that as they're usually more evolutionary than revolutionary. But this would be a significant step forward in the technology.
By that standard virtually all of science is based upon hubris as we haven't actually discovered everything there is to discover before coming up with hypothesis to test. By that measure it was arrogant of people to come up with the second without realizing that relativity is involved and that time doesn't exist at 0 kelvin.
Now, if you want legitimate arrogance, just look at those guys with their "string theory." It's been decades and they still haven't managed tho have a single testable hypothesis coincide with their ideas. A lot of things look good on paper as theory and then completely disintegrate when applied to the real world.
It's a pretty reasonable amount of time to expect. What rubbed me the wrong way was when the introduced Hulu plus and retained the commercials and limited the amount of content there and charged $10 a month. They've dropped the price, but not far enough to justify paying for it. Especially not if they're still showing ads and limiting the content available.
And yet, both the TSA and RNC sites go untouched. Perhaps it's somebody that's not so much going after sites that are sympathetic to terrorism as it is a fascist that's going after sites that are inconvenient to his world view.
It takes basically no integrity, ethics or courage to lick boot when somebody with a lot of clout asks you to. Kudos should be reserved for people and organizations that demonstrate some integrity, even if they ended up folding later.
That's absurd. The government can't even get together enough security researchers to secure their websites. And you expect me to believe that they've been able to gather together an elite squad of script kiddies?
That's assuming that he actually did it. But whether or not he did it, tweeting about committing a crime is stupid. Most of the time when cops bust somebody it's because the person did something stupid. There'd be a much smaller number of people in prison if individuals who had felony arrest warrants out for them were more mindful of obeying traffic laws when driving around
Slashdot Mirror
I think they will unless whatever state they use for legal jurisdiction says they can't. The main reason being that there's no profit for them in having dead accounts and it looks really bad refusing lawful requests.
Yes, but doing that takes longer than if they're provided with a list of criteria along with a scoring guide. It's not ideal, but it gives more time between adjustments and having to make a new adjustment because somebody has it figured out.
I gave up on Ubuntu when I switched to a bluetooth keyboard and found I couldn't log in without plugging in a second keyboard. I would've given them a pass on that if bluetooth were a new technology, but that was well within the last year.
I expect this sort of thing out of developer previews or on an unstable release, but for that to behave in that manner on a full release is asking a bit much. Likewise I think that it's foolhardy to decide to switch to Waypoint when it isn't completed yet. A better idea for a mainstream distro would be to wait until it firms up before making a decision. Sure it could be great, but do we really need another case where somebody found some cool technology then blindly integrated it only to find that it didn't live up to the hype?
Precisely, as confusing as the nomenclature can be, it's a client server model which doesn't require the client and the server to be on the same box. And yes indeed it's been that way for a really long time. It's not perfect, but you can do things like tunnel the connection over SSH or if you really want some other protocol. I suppose if you wanted to you could even tunnel it into a virtual machine.
The question though ultimately is whether or not it's better than some of the other techniques that people have used. But for Waypoint to completely neglect it is shortsighted to say the least.
There's no requirement that you do it on a small scale. Which was always one of the complaints. There's little to no difference in the DMCA between commercial and non-profit violations. But this isn't a violation of any part of the DMCA that I'm aware of. You still need the SIM card in order to access the network and unlocking the phone isn't going to change that. This just allows you to use a SIM card from a different carrier.
You're being dense. Nullification is the whole reason why we have an independent judicial branch.
Nullification is what happens when SCOTUS rules a law to be unconstitutional. Unless of course I've missed the cases where SCOTUS rules something to be unconstitutional and the law stays legally binding. What you're arguing is semantics as any law that's ruled to be unconstitutional is unconstitutional unless SCOTUS issues a new precedent or test that indicates otherwise.
And how precisely is that a violation of the DMCA? I'm serious, people bought the phones and there is no copyright involved with that.
Except that you're being judgmental and lacking any comprehension about what's going on. The reason why Wikileaks needs to be in the press is that many people who have information that they'd like to leak are unaware of how to go about it. Sure there are other methods of doing it, but that makes precisely zero difference if the people wanting to leak the material don't know about it.
What I'd like to know is whether you're being deliberately obtuse or are just trying to tow the line that Wikileaks is bad because some news program told you it is.
Really? Gmail users get spam? That's news to me, unless you're talking about that bit of junk mail that ends up in my inbox every several months.
You do realize that a lot of the countries in Africa are majority Muslim, right? There's a particularly strong Muslim population in the portion of Africa that covers the Sahara. So, this wouldn't solve your problem at all. But then again little would seeing as you're a bigoted moron.
No it wouldn't. What's destabilizing Africa at this point is corrupt politicians and other government officials. Providing a huge pot of cash isn't going to help that. The assumption you're making only applies when it's incompetence causing the problems rather than corruption. If it were just incompetence that would eventually solve itself, all they'd have to do is ask for help from the outside world. With corruption there is an incentive to keep the people out that might threaten your cash stream.
Not really, these days the patent office is so understaffed that I'd be surprised if they were giving anything a thorough review. In the past they would take the information from the patent and actually build it. These days I doubt very much that they bother unless there's something obviously fishy with it. And rarely if ever with tech patents. Otherwise they'd realize that a lot of these patents are bunk.
And previous to recent changes people didn't see a problem with a lack of that color deal in the URL bar of their browser showing that the cite was being access via SSL either. The way you handle that is education, and things like that which are simple are more likely to be used. The real problem with that is if an attacker manages to screw with the hash function to support an exception for certain files.
Indeed, Wikileaks at least in theory ought to be protected under the 1st amendment protection for the press. Now, the individuals making the leaks on the other hand are unlikely to be so covered, which is why the press normally has the ability to refuse to name sources in countries which care about democracy. Any journalist that wants to remain a journalist is going to keep his or her mouth shut about sources as naming one can effectively end his or her career. Especially if it's a major story and the source gets into trouble over it.
Citation necessary. Double jeopardy applies to trials that are completed where the jury decides to acquit. The defense is able to ask for another trial when found guilty. Additionally, it's been considered not to be a violation for trials to be retried at a different level of government or over different charges that cover the same actions for quite some time.
I don't personally care for it because it seems to be an end run around that particular protection, but it is established precedent and there's no reason to believe that it won't be upheld in the future.
Most platformers and most FPS game suck. But there's enough of a volume that you end up with plenty of good ones to play. Sort of like how most puzzle games suck, and well most games in general suck, but there's a large enough volume that you can always find at least a few games in the genre worth playing.
I haven't read the patent, but it appears to be far more than just what you're describing. What they've done is hooked it up to a computer which can apparently adjust the effect based upon the location of the viewers in the room. Which is in and of itself worthy of a patent if they've succeeded in doing so.
No it doesn't. From the description in the article Apple has something much more sophisticated. It apparently is smart enough to know where the individuals are sitting and makes accommodations for that. Rather than requiring an individual to sit in a particular place like all the other systems like this do. If they've managed to pull that off, I'll have to be the first one to tip my hat to their innovation. And I'm rare to do that as they're usually more evolutionary than revolutionary. But this would be a significant step forward in the technology.
By that standard virtually all of science is based upon hubris as we haven't actually discovered everything there is to discover before coming up with hypothesis to test. By that measure it was arrogant of people to come up with the second without realizing that relativity is involved and that time doesn't exist at 0 kelvin.
Now, if you want legitimate arrogance, just look at those guys with their "string theory." It's been decades and they still haven't managed tho have a single testable hypothesis coincide with their ideas. A lot of things look good on paper as theory and then completely disintegrate when applied to the real world.
It's a pretty reasonable amount of time to expect. What rubbed me the wrong way was when the introduced Hulu plus and retained the commercials and limited the amount of content there and charged $10 a month. They've dropped the price, but not far enough to justify paying for it. Especially not if they're still showing ads and limiting the content available.
Classic? You do realize that "classic" isn't a synonym for old, right? Somethings belong in the past and should remain buried there.
And yet, both the TSA and RNC sites go untouched. Perhaps it's somebody that's not so much going after sites that are sympathetic to terrorism as it is a fascist that's going after sites that are inconvenient to his world view.
It takes basically no integrity, ethics or courage to lick boot when somebody with a lot of clout asks you to. Kudos should be reserved for people and organizations that demonstrate some integrity, even if they ended up folding later.
That's absurd. The government can't even get together enough security researchers to secure their websites. And you expect me to believe that they've been able to gather together an elite squad of script kiddies?
That's assuming that he actually did it. But whether or not he did it, tweeting about committing a crime is stupid. Most of the time when cops bust somebody it's because the person did something stupid. There'd be a much smaller number of people in prison if individuals who had felony arrest warrants out for them were more mindful of obeying traffic laws when driving around