I do, because Firefox has slowly turned into a bloated pile of ass. Ironically, it's now more bloated and slower then IE9. This isn't 2004 anymore and we aren't talking about IE6.
Thank you for posting your expert opinion on the subject. No doubt you have a long list of credentials validating your immense expertise in all things IT. I wish I could tell but you posted AC. I guess I will just have to move forward with your expertly provided expert knowledge of everything.
It's up to the manufacturers or adventurous third parties to port Gingerbread to their phones. The source code and SDK have been released for some time now.
Revenue is not the same thing as profit. In order to have a negative revenue, Youtube would need to provide more refunds then they receive in sales, which is nearly impossible.
Currently using 3% CPU, not once did I see it go above 10% while posting this (running various shit in the background). Chrome stable on Windows 7. Maybe it's time to upgrade?
I think if you profile your code you will find that your scalability is limited more by the algorithms you use and by hardware I/O then CPU time or language. Particularly on a modern server, where the best scalability will come from the language that makes it easy and efficient to use multiple cores. C and C++ don't even have parallel execution features built into the core language.
Also, before you write off a language as being too slow, you need to have benchmarks to back it up. For a long period of time, the world speed record for sorting some ridiculously huge dataset was written in Java.
I'm not demanding it instantly. The entire thread has been about far off future tech and where it might lead. Don't strawman me bro.
Ah, so when there's a stationary car in front of you that's telling you it's actually driving at 50mph, you're giong to crash into the back of them? I guess that's a plan.
yes, because every car on the road will actually be communicating and everyone will be using the same standard
Why not? Damn near every computer in the world is capable of communicating with the others through TCP. When you go out onto any road in the world red light means stop, green light means go and the red light is always on top of or to the left of the green light. We have global standards, they work quite nicely.
none of them will be sending bad data
This is roughly equivalent to someone leaving their signal light on. IE: not a serious concern and easily designed around.
But like I said, cars are perfectly capable of communicating with each other in order to resolve conflicting interests and they can react far faster then any human could ever hope to. Not only that, but a computer wouldn't panic and "freeze up" when confronted with a dangerous situation.
Actually I would argue that a program can anticipate a dangerous situation better then a human because humans can only track a small number of things simultaneously and can be easily distracted.
Why can't the computer in your vehicle be communicating with the computers in the vehicles around it? There is no reason that a sufficiently advanced program couldn't anticipate such a scenario and avoid it altogether.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah that stopped being a concern in 2002. Cool story bro.
Yup, everyone that disagrees with you must be paid off. You may wish to remove the tin foil hat before you post though.
Translation: I can't think of anything to do with this hardware therefore it's useless to everyone.
I do, because Firefox has slowly turned into a bloated pile of ass. Ironically, it's now more bloated and slower then IE9. This isn't 2004 anymore and we aren't talking about IE6.
discriminating
What a laugh. Enjoy your monster hdmi cable.
Transparency International's annual Corruption Perceptions Index
Highlighted the important part for you.
Thank you for posting your expert opinion on the subject. No doubt you have a long list of credentials validating your immense expertise in all things IT. I wish I could tell but you posted AC. I guess I will just have to move forward with your expertly provided expert knowledge of everything.
It's up to the manufacturers or adventurous third parties to port Gingerbread to their phones. The source code and SDK have been released for some time now.
Revenue is not the same thing as profit. In order to have a negative revenue, Youtube would need to provide more refunds then they receive in sales, which is nearly impossible.
Sure, but now you can use two frequencies in full duplex. No matter how you look at it, it's a doubling in capacity.
Oh noes, they would have wasted 10 minutes of their time before moving on to the pothole down the road. Sonovabitch.
Yes actually, a whole lot more. In fact you didn't really say anything at all.
There is a package that comes with 350gb/month if you feel like paying $150. Personally I stick with the same one you have.
Currently using 3% CPU, not once did I see it go above 10% while posting this (running various shit in the background). Chrome stable on Windows 7. Maybe it's time to upgrade?
Likewise.
I hear slashdot is serious business and every post on it is dead serious and should not be taken lightly.
Fair enough, but whose fault is that?
I think if you profile your code you will find that your scalability is limited more by the algorithms you use and by hardware I/O then CPU time or language. Particularly on a modern server, where the best scalability will come from the language that makes it easy and efficient to use multiple cores. C and C++ don't even have parallel execution features built into the core language. Also, before you write off a language as being too slow, you need to have benchmarks to back it up. For a long period of time, the world speed record for sorting some ridiculously huge dataset was written in Java.
Must be pretty nice to be able to say that on a network developed by a government agency.
Yeah, Henri Richard is going to be pissed!
This post isn't modded nearly high enough. The goal of technology isn't to make things more complicated, it's to make our lives easier.
Ah, so when there's a stationary car in front of you that's telling you it's actually driving at 50mph, you're giong to crash into the back of them? I guess that's a plan.
Radar.
yes, because every car on the road will actually be communicating and everyone will be using the same standard
Why not? Damn near every computer in the world is capable of communicating with the others through TCP. When you go out onto any road in the world red light means stop, green light means go and the red light is always on top of or to the left of the green light. We have global standards, they work quite nicely.
none of them will be sending bad data
This is roughly equivalent to someone leaving their signal light on. IE: not a serious concern and easily designed around.
But like I said, cars are perfectly capable of communicating with each other in order to resolve conflicting interests and they can react far faster then any human could ever hope to. Not only that, but a computer wouldn't panic and "freeze up" when confronted with a dangerous situation.
Actually I would argue that a program can anticipate a dangerous situation better then a human because humans can only track a small number of things simultaneously and can be easily distracted.
Why can't the computer in your vehicle be communicating with the computers in the vehicles around it? There is no reason that a sufficiently advanced program couldn't anticipate such a scenario and avoid it altogether.