Slashdot Mirror


User: balsy2001

balsy2001's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
279
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 279

  1. Re:Charge it! on NASA Weighs Moon Plans · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. The previous posts are confused because they include social security and medicare into the national budget (read the link in the parent comment to learn why this is important).

  2. Re:any lawyers available? on Physicist Trying To Send a Signal Back In Time · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't travel back in time to GET the winning numbers for a lottery in the future. You have to SEND the winning numbers back to yourself.

  3. Re:mod parent up on Death of the Cell Phone Keypad As We Know It? · · Score: 1

    It can work just fine, it will translate what you say to text. That is not a problem with speech to text it is a problem with bad gramar. People who use bad gramar in speach will likely have bad gramar in typing. Speech impediments could be trouble some for the software.

  4. Re:my wish for election 2006 on Saving Democracy With Web 2.0 · · Score: 1

    My wish for the 2006 election is that "None of the above" be implemented on the ballot. Then if say 30% of the people vote none of the above we have a new election.

  5. Re:Not a problem on Smart Cameras Detect Crime, Erode Privacy · · Score: 1

    But if you rob someone with a pretend gun you can still be charged armed robbery. see http://www.law.ua.edu/colquitt/crimmain/crimcase/g arza.htm Even pointing a fake gun at someone can be a crime, so that part of your plan might not work. see http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4191/i s_20050108/ai_n10043840

  6. Re:Not really eroding privacy on Smart Cameras Detect Crime, Erode Privacy · · Score: 1

    I am not in favor of Big Brother always looking over my shoulder and pulling off "patriotic" stuff, my only point was that there may be a time and a place for some video monitoring that wouldn't necessarily be an invasion of privacy. I think the important thing is that any monitoring that is done is known to the public. Hidden cameras are a no go for me, but if a city, say NYC, wants to monitor Times Square and they put up signs that let you know entering an area under video surrvailance that could be ok. In DC they have traffic cameras along the major roads and you can get a stream on the internet to check which way you should go. Is that an invasion of privacy (you can get plate numbers off it)? Or (some people might not like this) they also have camera speed traps, but they are all marked on the roads with white stripes (it basically says if you speed here you are dumb because we WILL send you a ticket). In the NYC example if the cameras were posted to the internet and the public had the same access that the government I would likely consider it OK. I agree that they have no business targeting you speciffically because of something you MIGHT do.

  7. Not really eroding privacy on Smart Cameras Detect Crime, Erode Privacy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they were getting put up in your house yes, but is it reasonable to have an expectation of privacy on the street? A tourist can snap pictures all day long and that doesn't erode privacy.

  8. Re:Carbon Nuetral?...Google really is a good compa on Google's Internal Company Goals · · Score: 1

    Don't forget BIG TOBBACO.

  9. Re:Interesting cans, but quite the scam... on Calorie Burning Coke Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    Ok to keep the units consistent how about 4.19 J/gC.

  10. Re:Interesting cans, but quite the scam... on Calorie Burning Coke Coming Soon · · Score: 1

    And the colder the better. Your body will have to use energy to heat it up (4.19 J/gF).

  11. Re:Frictionless environment on Dot-Com Bubble v2.0? · · Score: 1

    I agree with you completely. In the 90's it was much more dramatic than I think it will be during future cycles because it was brand new. The internet had just started to be a common thing. So while the cycles continue people won't get as silly this time because we all know that it won't change the world in 60 seconds or less.

  12. Conspiracy Theory on iPods Come Complete With Windows Virus · · Score: 1

    Could this have been on purpose? No, but a what a great way to get people to switch to Macs.

  13. Re:I'm excited. on FDA Set To Approve Products from Cloned Cows · · Score: 1

    His point is that there isn't really any information becuase they get to change all of the parameters to fit what the marketing department tells them will sell the best. Completely usless information is as good as no information.

  14. Re:Illegal? on Battlefield 2142 to Bundle Spyware? · · Score: 1

    And imagine all of those poor people who will buy this game and have no idea what is going on because if they are required to put a warning on the box it will be in fine fine print.

  15. Re:I'm excited. on FDA Set To Approve Products from Cloned Cows · · Score: 1

    I agree a few more details on the labeling. The requirement to use "0 trans fat" or "fat free" is that there is only 0.5g PER SERVING. So it doesn't even have to be significantly below the 1g level. From http://www.fda.gov/opacom/backgrounders/foodlabel/ newlabel.html Free. This term means that a product contains no amount of, or only trivial or "physiologically inconsequential" amounts of, one or more of these components: fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, sugars, and calories. For example, "calorie-free" means fewer than 5 calories per serving, and "sugar-free" and "fat-free" both mean less than 0.5 g per serving. Synonyms for "free" include "without," "no" and "zero." A synonym for fat-free milk is "skim". There are also many other defenitions for "low", "lean", "high"....

  16. Oh No! on Microsoft Working With Security Vendors · · Score: 4, Funny

    MS is destroying my revenue stream by making a more secure OS!

  17. Re:Nothing new on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    Yeah, close enough. Who is this?

  18. Re:Shut them down! on Backyard Rocketeers Keep the Solid Fuel Burning · · Score: 1

    I guess we should just ban all mechanised vehicles too, because without them we would definately save just one life and then it would all be worth it.

  19. Re:Hardly the first floating Nuclear Power Plant on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    It is not defining the problem away. There are problems with spilling primary coolant, but it is very different from melitng the core down. defining the difference between those two things is useful especially to the public who reacts the same way that people did to this article.

  20. Re:Hardly the first floating Nuclear Power Plant on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    This is not a lie. There is a fundamental difference between a reactor accident and unintentional release of radiation. Read my previous post on this.

  21. Molecular Scale Surgery? on Molecules Manipulated with Lasers · · Score: 1

    And I thought it took a lot of my time to go to the doctor before. Repairing individual cells, now thats got to take a while.

  22. Re:Scary? on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    The irony is that on top of this they want cheap electricity too!

  23. Re:Safety on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    I know this happened in charleston after a hurricane and would not suprise me.

  24. Re:No accidents?!? on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, I am actually a Naval Officer who designs the reactors (what NUPOC was to demanding). Those are not considered Reactor Accidents. A reactor accident is defined by a failure of the fuel system that releases significant amount of radioactivity into the environment. None of the accidents that you listed are due to a failure of the core and are therfore not REACTOR ACCIDENTS!!! Get your facts straight before you post!

  25. Re:Cheap? on A $200-Million Floating Nuclear Plant? · · Score: 1

    Land based nuclear power plants cost billions to build. Navy vessels also cost billions to build, but they do a lot more than just make electricity.