No, just that it supports the fact the he wants to bring about the destruction of the United States government.
Almost every aggressor believes they are in the right, and was forced into aggressive action because of the "other" party. Mr Assange is no different, but as a (former?) Australian citizen, how/why exactly does the think the United States was attacking him (first)? Do you think the United States government just one day said let's attack some random Aussie guy? It's quite odd, because he's confessed to hacking into US based companies and infrastructure (and was convicted of it), but apparently the US government is attacking him.
Sorry, but this guy is a lunatic with warped views of the world.
If the US was going to take care of asshat, they would do a much better job than this. He'd either disappear, magically appear in gitmo, be assassinated in public, or all of the above.
A quote from Mr Assange himself “we have been attacked by the United States, so we are forced into a position where we must defend ourselves.”
In any case, Mr Assange is a convicted criminal (fact), an acused rapist and molester (fact), paranoid ( self admitted), and many closer to him than you or I will ever be has described him as such with naive anarchist political views. He can deny any or all of the former but facts and actions prove his words to be false. Just like his original cyberpunk handle -- although as a computer hacker, most would consider him more of a incompetant noob.
No, those numbers do not count dialup users. Just broadband.
In this context, dialup users are pretty insignificant as they aren't always on and don't have the bandwidth necessary to mass infect other machines undetected.
Actually the ability to task switch was detected in many places, one of which was the "idle" message. There were many other places that also triggered it, file IO being one, checking for keyboard activity, etc etc. However, if windows was in the middle of a DOS call, in many cases it was unsafe to switch to another task (DOS was not fully re-entrant) so often the task switch would/could be delayed, and if the system crashed while DOS was in the middle of one of it's calls, it brought down the entire system.
In later versions 3.11/3.12 (maybe 3.1 as well), the timer interrupt was also used as a possible trigger to task switch, and since many dos functions had been moved to a true 32-bit protected mode code, there chance that DOS was in the middle of one of these important functions that could not/should be pre-empted dropped significantly.
This being the reason that Microsoft Windows refused to run on non MS-DOS regardless of what other people say. DOS wasn't really designed to be fully re-entrant, and it was tricky enough to get it to work on the version they controlled, and DR-DOS/FreeDos had a different set of rules of when it was safe to be interrupted and when it wasn't. It wasn't totally about 3rd party lockout.
I thought it was because AT&T/SCO unix came on like 80 3.5" disks, and had a shelf and a half of reference manuals so you could get the thing configured, and the unix base was fractured between competing implementations making it extremely difficult for 3rd parties to write software that would run on any of them.
Add in that the majority of terminals were text-only, and most systems were limited to vt100/vt220/ansi escape sequences (or similiar), and even different manufacturers of those terminals couldn't get the sequence for sending F1-F10 (and other) keys correctly making it a PITA.
On the other hand windows came on few disks, installed quickly (and no manual needed to do so), and the only reference manual was 1 book, and you really didn't even need that.
Yes, actually it does. It's apparent that piece of the US's anatomy found it's way into the behind of theolein, or he's just another sore piece of eurotrash, or more likely both.
Personally, I find it hard to beat. $2244 (full retail price, can get this knocked down significantly from OEMs, Volume Licensing, or a NPO/NGO discount from Microsoft) for a fully licensed version of SBS. Insert disk, answer 10 questions and you servers are done.
Order a bunch of desktops and a few laptops (if any) from Dell with Win 7 Professional (and perhaps Office). You can get some cheap desktops $470ish for Windows 7 Proff, dual core, 18" LCD, 3GB ram. Feel free to add more hardware if you think you company requires it.
A 24 port switch from any major networking company (cisco, etc) and your network is done.
Toss in a wireless router if you want for your conference room so the laptop guys (typically sales/marketting guys) can make presentations easily. Just make sure to do some research on this to properly secure it -- Both from being able to sniff and what you can connect to once authenticated.
I did read it. Unfortunately other than the fact that the right to travel isn't in the constitution the rest is conjecture from the tard that wrote the site, which obviously conflicts with the current views on the subject as our current laws and TSA mandate prove otherwise.
It is a bad test that did nothing useful. IE9 detects some simple cases where nothing is being done and skips it instead. Sunspider just happens to have a test that triggers it. It is a generic test, however, at the moment it is pretty primative but it will likely get better over time. Sunspider needs to actually do something with their results to prevent this from happening.
Actually that was a quote from the justice regarding a first amendment case. I will leave it at that. I'll disregard your need to share your thoughts about me as a defense mechanism. It would be good if you brushed up on your social grace; You really don't need to stoop to that level to make a rational point.
That makes a nice headline, but everything the article is based on has been proven to be untrue and sensationalist. My 8 year old son, when he lost, used to also accuse others of cheating as well. Usually he was wrong as well, but I didn't take his word for it and then try to pass off a news article on it.
I totally agree. Myst was an abomination to adventure games. There were so many better ones out before it and after it. The journeyman project was better in every way, and even the seventh guest at least had some puzzles that required thought rather than just random clicking. Wing Commander blew Myst away as well and was released 3 years prior, Wing Commander 3 was light years beyond Myst.
As a side note, I tried thunderbird. It sucked. It dies on the install if you try to import multiple email accounts as it tosses up multiple modal dialog boxes that you can't respond to any of them. Once you get passed that, it doesn't even have a threaded view of emails, doesn't sync with iTunes easily, and has a very limited amount of fields for contacts. Even my mobile phone has more fields than that which makes syncing a pita.
I wished it worked well, and I've tried looking for an open source email client that didn't just suck, and I couldn't find one. Sad, most of them seemed like the commercial email clients we had 10 years ago or more, in many cases not even that good.
Gmail is one of the accounts I pull into my email client (smtp.gmail.com / pop.gmail.com), so gmail filters out spam for me before my client even sees them and does it's own filtering.
I also have an email account (my main one) that I've had for the past 25 years.
I also have my ISP account which I get periodic notices of stuff on.
I also have a few accounts (for gaming, etc) in which I want to keep completely separate from my others.
I also have one (or more) email accounts at my places of work (which change every 6 months to 3 years).
No, just that it supports the fact the he wants to bring about the destruction of the United States government.
Almost every aggressor believes they are in the right, and was forced into aggressive action because of the "other" party. Mr Assange is no different, but as a (former?) Australian citizen, how/why exactly does the think the United States was attacking him (first)? Do you think the United States government just one day said let's attack some random Aussie guy? It's quite odd, because he's confessed to hacking into US based companies and infrastructure (and was convicted of it), but apparently the US government is attacking him.
Sorry, but this guy is a lunatic with warped views of the world.
You speak as if multiple departments need to coordinate to make it happen, which it doesn't
If the US was going to take care of asshat, they would do a much better job than this. He'd either disappear, magically appear in gitmo, be assassinated in public, or all of the above.
A quote from Mr Assange himself “we have been attacked by the United States, so we are forced into a position where we must defend ourselves.”
In any case, Mr Assange is a convicted criminal (fact), an acused rapist and molester (fact), paranoid ( self admitted), and many closer to him than you or I will ever be has described him as such with naive anarchist political views. He can deny any or all of the former but facts and actions prove his words to be false. Just like his original cyberpunk handle -- although as a computer hacker, most would consider him more of a incompetant noob.
Feel free to make your own network at any time.
It's not been a secret that they (or atleast ass ange) wants anarchy and to bring the destruction of all governments, especially the US.
n/t
Must be your lifestyle. Typically the more information the insurance companies collect, the lower my premiums get.
No, those numbers do not count dialup users. Just broadband.
In this context, dialup users are pretty insignificant as they aren't always on and don't have the bandwidth necessary to mass infect other machines undetected.
Actually the ability to task switch was detected in many places, one of which was the "idle" message. There were many other places that also triggered it, file IO being one, checking for keyboard activity, etc etc. However, if windows was in the middle of a DOS call, in many cases it was unsafe to switch to another task (DOS was not fully re-entrant) so often the task switch would/could be delayed, and if the system crashed while DOS was in the middle of one of it's calls, it brought down the entire system.
In later versions 3.11/3.12 (maybe 3.1 as well), the timer interrupt was also used as a possible trigger to task switch, and since many dos functions had been moved to a true 32-bit protected mode code, there chance that DOS was in the middle of one of these important functions that could not/should be pre-empted dropped significantly.
This being the reason that Microsoft Windows refused to run on non MS-DOS regardless of what other people say. DOS wasn't really designed to be fully re-entrant, and it was tricky enough to get it to work on the version they controlled, and DR-DOS/FreeDos had a different set of rules of when it was safe to be interrupted and when it wasn't. It wasn't totally about 3rd party lockout.
Yes, ST meant sixteen/thirty-two. The later versions of the atari were named TT for thirty-two/thirty-two.
I thought it was because AT&T/SCO unix came on like 80 3.5" disks, and had a shelf and a half of reference manuals so you could get the thing configured, and the unix base was fractured between competing implementations making it extremely difficult for 3rd parties to write software that would run on any of them.
Add in that the majority of terminals were text-only, and most systems were limited to vt100/vt220/ansi escape sequences (or similiar), and even different manufacturers of those terminals couldn't get the sequence for sending F1-F10 (and other) keys correctly making it a PITA.
On the other hand windows came on few disks, installed quickly (and no manual needed to do so), and the only reference manual was 1 book, and you really didn't even need that.
It was a re licensed copy of 4Dos.
Yes, actually it does. It's apparent that piece of the US's anatomy found it's way into the behind of theolein, or he's just another sore piece of eurotrash, or more likely both.
Personally, I find it hard to beat. $2244 (full retail price, can get this knocked down significantly from OEMs, Volume Licensing, or a NPO/NGO discount from Microsoft) for a fully licensed version of SBS. Insert disk, answer 10 questions and you servers are done.
Order a bunch of desktops and a few laptops (if any) from Dell with Win 7 Professional (and perhaps Office). You can get some cheap desktops $470ish for Windows 7 Proff, dual core, 18" LCD, 3GB ram. Feel free to add more hardware if you think you company requires it.
A 24 port switch from any major networking company (cisco, etc) and your network is done.
Toss in a wireless router if you want for your conference room so the laptop guys (typically sales/marketting guys) can make presentations easily. Just make sure to do some research on this to properly secure it -- Both from being able to sniff and what you can connect to once authenticated.
I concede, it is obviously protected by the fifth amendment.
I did read it. Unfortunately other than the fact that the right to travel isn't in the constitution the rest is conjecture from the tard that wrote the site, which obviously conflicts with the current views on the subject as our current laws and TSA mandate prove otherwise.
Please read the 27th link on the page you just sent me entitled "The right to travel" under things NOT in the constitution.
It is a bad test that did nothing useful. IE9 detects some simple cases where nothing is being done and skips it instead. Sunspider just happens to have a test that triggers it. It is a generic test, however, at the moment it is pretty primative but it will likely get better over time. Sunspider needs to actually do something with their results to prevent this from happening.
Actually that was a quote from the justice regarding a first amendment case. I will leave it at that. I'll disregard your need to share your thoughts about me as a defense mechanism. It would be good if you brushed up on your social grace; You really don't need to stoop to that level to make a rational point.
That makes a nice headline, but everything the article is based on has been proven to be untrue and sensationalist. My 8 year old son, when he lost, used to also accuse others of cheating as well. Usually he was wrong as well, but I didn't take his word for it and then try to pass off a news article on it.
I totally agree. Myst was an abomination to adventure games. There were so many better ones out before it and after it. The journeyman project was better in every way, and even the seventh guest at least had some puzzles that required thought rather than just random clicking. Wing Commander blew Myst away as well and was released 3 years prior, Wing Commander 3 was light years beyond Myst.
As a side note, I tried thunderbird. It sucked. It dies on the install if you try to import multiple email accounts as it tosses up multiple modal dialog boxes that you can't respond to any of them. Once you get passed that, it doesn't even have a threaded view of emails, doesn't sync with iTunes easily, and has a very limited amount of fields for contacts. Even my mobile phone has more fields than that which makes syncing a pita.
I wished it worked well, and I've tried looking for an open source email client that didn't just suck, and I couldn't find one. Sad, most of them seemed like the commercial email clients we had 10 years ago or more, in many cases not even that good.
Gmail is one of the accounts I pull into my email client (smtp.gmail.com / pop.gmail.com), so gmail filters out spam for me before my client even sees them and does it's own filtering.
I also have an email account (my main one) that I've had for the past 25 years.
I also have my ISP account which I get periodic notices of stuff on.
I also have a few accounts (for gaming, etc) in which I want to keep completely separate from my others.
I also have one (or more) email accounts at my places of work (which change every 6 months to 3 years).
RFC-822 reserves port 25 for sending mail.