Without actually hacking in & getting hold of data to begin with, they can not honestly state any statistics.
They can only speculate without actual data.
So unless they're full of shit to begin with, they've already done somthing unethical.
Well in that case, we shouldn't invest in more teleco infrastructure or worry about government regulation, we should just quit going to work.
That's a %50 reduction in the probability of an epidemic right there.
They've obviously not considered the impact this could have on driving while using your cellphone.
Take a trip with me into the future & meet Marcie, Marcie is deaf & uses a sign language enabled cellphone.
While driving on the highway (yeah, still no flying cars), Marcies husband signs to her over the phone that he wants a divorce so he can marry his secretary.
She swerves slightly due to her shock.
I, being the cautious driver I am ahead of her, look in my rearview mirror at the moment she happens to flip her husband the finger before hanging up on him.
I, being unaware that Marcie is deaf & using her sign phone, say "oh hell no !" & lock up my brakes.
Since Marcie wasn't wearing her seatbelt when she slammed into the back of my car she was ejected through the windshield & now is not only deaf, but paralysed.
There is a somewhat happy ending to this story though, since I live in Florida, there was no legal excuse for Marcie to rearend me & I got 10 million dollars out of the money she gets in her divorce.
They want to know what makes retarded people retarded & try to fix it at the neurological level, because decades of making people aware that they're retarded & trying to smack some sense into them, while entertaining for the rest of us, doesn't seem to be working.
the Department of Defense is prepared, based on the authority of the president, to launch a cyber counterattack
I call bullshit.
If they're confident in having a cyber counterattack, there would be no need to worry about anything that would warrent a counterattack.
Quit being a fucking crybaby & find somthing to patent then follow through with the exaustive processes required to patent it, then come back here & whine.
What are Apple users doing going to Walmart to get media, don't they have iMedia or somthing vastly superior to anything Walmart & Microsoft would produce ?
The company behind the latest You Tube video sensation would like you to know this: It was never the intention to portray anything other than a dramatization.
In that case, I suppose they'll understand if I create videos that make it appear products like theirs ruined my life, dropping hints to make people think of their products & post them in the same mannor as their videos.
Afterall, it's only a dramatization.
Sad thing is, I'm willing to bet I'd have cease and desist or face legal consequences letters sent to me faster than I could imagine by doing so.
The application describes how face-recognition webcams and CAPTCHAs can be used in schools to ensure that computer users are paying attention to ads
Surely this is a joke.
Do you know how many times I was sent to the principals office for not paying attention to my schoolwork, or how many report cards I got with low grades explained by "Joseph needs to learn to ignore distractions" ?
Slashdot Mirror
Without actually hacking in & getting hold of data to begin with, they can not honestly state any statistics.
They can only speculate without actual data.
So unless they're full of shit to begin with, they've already done somthing unethical.
Science had to start somewhere, it didn't fall off a tree & make someone say "By god, I'll call this science !".
I don't know, the stuff I've been reading gives me the impression they're the same thing with different names & methods of deriving a conclusion.
If philosophy came before science, then science must be the philosophy of a philosopher.
Are you sure that a medicine man didn't once shake a stick with moldy feathers & by chance cure an illness ?
What came first, Science or Philosophy ?
So much for "leaking" info into the hands of terrorists, thanks alot Captain Obvious.
Everyone I know who does file sharing can't afford to buy the albums anyway.
Well in that case, we shouldn't invest in more teleco infrastructure or worry about government regulation, we should just quit going to work.
That's a %50 reduction in the probability of an epidemic right there.
They've obviously not considered the impact this could have on driving while using your cellphone.
Take a trip with me into the future & meet Marcie, Marcie is deaf & uses a sign language enabled cellphone.
While driving on the highway (yeah, still no flying cars), Marcies husband signs to her over the phone that he wants a divorce so he can marry his secretary.
She swerves slightly due to her shock.
I, being the cautious driver I am ahead of her, look in my rearview mirror at the moment she happens to flip her husband the finger before hanging up on him.
I, being unaware that Marcie is deaf & using her sign phone, say "oh hell no !" & lock up my brakes.
Since Marcie wasn't wearing her seatbelt when she slammed into the back of my car she was ejected through the windshield & now is not only deaf, but paralysed.
There is a somewhat happy ending to this story though, since I live in Florida, there was no legal excuse for Marcie to rearend me & I got 10 million dollars out of the money she gets in her divorce.
So, Science is the philosophy of the philosopher who was right ?
You can't "go faster than" real time, because real time is used to measure speed.
You can however, "do more in" real time.
I for one think it would be intresting to put the Holy Bible in there just to see what happens.
They want to know what makes retarded people retarded & try to fix it at the neurological level, because decades of making people aware that they're retarded & trying to smack some sense into them, while entertaining for the rest of us, doesn't seem to be working.
Wasn't science invented to aid in philosophy ?
I call bullshit.
If they're confident in having a cyber counterattack, there would be no need to worry about anything that would warrent a counterattack.
They have nothing, it's a bluff.
That can also be read as "Slick way to copy an idea".
It shows that nobody is capable of comming up with an original idea anymore, not that the patent system discourages innovation.
Think about it, if it infringes on a patent, aka somthing that's been thought of before, how can it be innovative ?
Quit being a fucking crybaby & find somthing to patent then follow through with the exaustive processes required to patent it, then come back here & whine.
If that's so, I have to wonder about thoose actually complaining that they can't get to it.
You've obviously never shit your pants before.
What are Apple users doing going to Walmart to get media, don't they have iMedia or somthing vastly superior to anything Walmart & Microsoft would produce ?
In that case, I suppose they'll understand if I create videos that make it appear products like theirs ruined my life, dropping hints to make people think of their products & post them in the same mannor as their videos.
Afterall, it's only a dramatization.
Sad thing is, I'm willing to bet I'd have cease and desist or face legal consequences letters sent to me faster than I could imagine by doing so.
Joe bert
P.O. BOX 123456
Somecity, Florida 77777
You're likely to have an attourney the audience you find will listen to ?
Surely this is a joke.
Do you know how many times I was sent to the principals office for not paying attention to my schoolwork, or how many report cards I got with low grades explained by "Joseph needs to learn to ignore distractions" ?