Starts off with: People in silicon valley are in a bubble...Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.
Trump's reality bubble and Silicon Valley's reality bubble are two independent things, although perhaps caused by similar forces, such as too much money meets too much ego.
the Finnish parliament that stopped it for political reasons in December, only one year into the two year experiment, not because it failed.
It would probably take a couple of decades to be a decent experiment. How people react in 2 years may differ from how they act over 10. Even if more time makes no significant difference, at least that fact would be confirmed empirically.
How is this different from Wall Street plutocrats of the Thurston Howell type? They've been with us since the industrial age, and in royalty before that in the "let them eat cake" sense.
I hear Oracle is trying to sue anyone publishing JavaScript because they own the trademark "JavaScript". Lawsuit fear may finally end the organic mess of JavaScript floating around. Okay, I'm only dreaming.
People that work with automation will keep their jobs
Perhaps, but human bot maintainers are probably roughly a 1:10 ratio to bots. Further, R&D on future bots may likely be cut because it's not an immediate return. During slumps, "non essential" staff is often cut, and R&D is not immediately essential. The math doesn't seem to support your point.
We are statistically due and perhaps over-due for a global recession based on the usual "business cycle" patterns. They usually keep the bots and fire the humans during slumps.
Craigslist etc. should sue per free-speech guarantees of the Constitution, which overrides Congressional legislation (per court interpretation of Constitution).
They could argue that the practical effects of the law hurt free legal speech. The court(s) may not outright strike the law down in its entirety, but strike down portions of it, or at least strike down enforcement of portions of it.
It's unrealistic for a website hoster to monitor millions of users, and jail them if just ONE user slips through.
Ultimately it will probably come down the regular old "Hillary thing" of "intent", and judges or juries will make that determination. Did the alleged perpetrator "intend" to gain unauthorized access.
I know this one. "The code is the documentation." Sadly, it breaks down really quickly when...
I've seen stupid fads screw up our stacks and practices also. I don't have the office politics power to stop the idiocy. I'll just enjoy the Titanic's violin music while it's above water. I bet when it sinks, the fadboys will call it a "submarine".
It's a security risk put too much of the app logic on the client side, let alone being tripped up on client-specific bugs. Then again, risk hasn't stopped a lot of questionable trends/fads.
[Obama] did a pretty good job of killing leaders of other nations with no clue on what to do after, or destabilize an entire area of the world to the point that millions try fleeing to Europe
That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.
Slashdot Mirror
Last Post! (from Windows phone)
Trump's reality bubble and Silicon Valley's reality bubble are two independent things, although perhaps caused by similar forces, such as too much money meets too much ego.
It would probably take a couple of decades to be a decent experiment. How people react in 2 years may differ from how they act over 10. Even if more time makes no significant difference, at least that fact would be confirmed empirically.
Well well, it's the Grammar Yoda (Writing Yoda?) Fockit
How is this different from Wall Street plutocrats of the Thurston Howell type? They've been with us since the industrial age, and in royalty before that in the "let them eat cake" sense.
I'll give you 3 ad-free FaceBook accounts if you keep quiet about this.
Goatse for you
I hear Oracle is trying to sue anyone publishing JavaScript because they own the trademark "JavaScript". Lawsuit fear may finally end the organic mess of JavaScript floating around. Okay, I'm only dreaming.
Perhaps, but human bot maintainers are probably roughly a 1:10 ratio to bots. Further, R&D on future bots may likely be cut because it's not an immediate return. During slumps, "non essential" staff is often cut, and R&D is not immediately essential. The math doesn't seem to support your point.
But once the bots' ability stabilizes for a task, they pretty much stay in place.
The island served strategic cold-war purposes, but now that the cold-war is over, they are being thrown under the bus.
Well, it's a golden opportunity for solar panel salespeople.
We are statistically due and perhaps over-due for a global recession based on the usual "business cycle" patterns. They usually keep the bots and fire the humans during slumps.
As long as it's mostly rich folks falling for it, I'm good with that.
It's called the Ruble
Southern Australians?
Craigslist etc. should sue per free-speech guarantees of the Constitution, which overrides Congressional legislation (per court interpretation of Constitution).
They could argue that the practical effects of the law hurt free legal speech. The court(s) may not outright strike the law down in its entirety, but strike down portions of it, or at least strike down enforcement of portions of it.
It's unrealistic for a website hoster to monitor millions of users, and jail them if just ONE user slips through.
Congress doesn't need a specific law violation to impeach and remove a misbehaving President; it merely needs enough votes.
By the way, what's an example of somebody "obstructing justice" without intent? Accidentally falling on an officer and squashing them?
Projection.
Ultimately it will probably come down the regular old "Hillary thing" of "intent", and judges or juries will make that determination. Did the alleged perpetrator "intend" to gain unauthorized access.
A civil war begun and he started mass killings of his own people, which made the civil war all the more heated. US didn't start the civil war.
You are comparing shit to puke.
I've seen stupid fads screw up our stacks and practices also. I don't have the office politics power to stop the idiocy. I'll just enjoy the Titanic's violin music while it's above water. I bet when it sinks, the fadboys will call it a "submarine".
It's a security risk put too much of the app logic on the client side, let alone being tripped up on client-specific bugs. Then again, risk hasn't stopped a lot of questionable trends/fads.
That's a bunch of bunk. Obama did NOT start the civil wars, and they raged on with and without dictator removal. Keeping (Syria) versus removing original dictator (Libya) made no difference: both countries went to shit. If the Middle East civil wars had any single cause, it was the harsh economic crash that began under W's watch.
Get a better news channel, please.
Errorist.