Slashdot Mirror


'Increasingly, People in Silicon Valley Are Losing Touch With Reality' (500ish.com)

Longtime commentator MG Siegler writes: You can see it in the tweets. You can hear it at tech conferences. Hell, you can hear it at most cafes in San Francisco on any given day. People -- really smart people -- saying some of the most vacuous things. Words that if they were able to take a step outside of their own heads and hear, they'd be embarrassed by. Or, at least, these are stances, thoughts, and ideas that these people should be embarrassed by. But they're clearly not because they keep saying them. This isn't only about Facebook -- far from it. That's just the most high profile and timely example of a company suffering from some of this. And in that case, it's really more in their responses to the Cambridge Analytica situation, rather than the situation itself (which is another matter, though undoubtedly related). They don't know the right things to say because they don't know what to say, period. Because they've slipped out of touch.

But again, I feel like this is increasingly everywhere I look around tech. It's an industry filled with some of the most brilliant people in the world, which makes it all the more disappointing. I won't name names but also because I don't have to. I'd wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I'm talking about in their own circles -- even if only in their own virtual circles. This is everywhere. I don't know the cause of this. Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump, even if only indirectly (a man who has gotten ahead in life by saying asinine things). If I had to guess, I'd say the root is an increasing sense of entitlement as the tech industry has grown in stature to become the most important from a fiscal perspective and arguably from a cultural perspective as well.

458 comments

  1. Idiot post about Silicon Valley by CajunArson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Starts off with: People in silicon valley are in a bubble.

    True statement.

    Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.

    Yeah... that basically shows the author is basically in the same bubble as the people in Silicon Valley.

    Lemme guess: The main conclusion is that the elitists in Silicon Valley aren't Pavlovianly "woke" enough, which is why they are in the bubble?

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    1. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Agreed. Perhaps the real problem is that we are talking about millennials, and in the valley they are all entitled, vapid, egoistic, victimistic, not actually all that intelligent, drug-addled and privileged clods with the emotional maturity of something growing in a petri dish. The post actually serves of a fantastic demonstration of what is wrong, just not for the intended reasons. Self-awareness, much?

    2. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by STRICQ · · Score: 2

      Spot on! The author of the article needs to realize he is in the same bubble.

    3. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't it likely that the writer is in a separate bubble too -- a bubble not exposed to the real world of unregulated commerce, or values different from the writers. I think the Trump reference gives it away, and the shock of finding out that the tech industry consists of people, just like energy, real-estate and banking industries.

    4. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I stopped reading when it was said there'd be no examples.

      I don't actually know what the author is talking about.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah...the author seems to make a LOT of assumptions that everyone knows what he is talking about, as far as opinions and all.

      He never gave a single example of one of these thoughts the Silicon Valley folks have that are out of touch.

      I would agree on many things, they are, but in an article like this, I would expect some specific items they are out of touch with.....

      He mentions Facebook and Cambridge....but what about that does he thing they are out of touch on?

      And just automatically jumping in with a Trump bash....that just derails any other points he was trying to make.

      Poorly written article, with assumptions that everyone things like he does.....without listing out what he thinks.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read this totally differently... I'm decidedly NOT in Silicon Valley and from my perspective this author is possibly on to something, but totally struck out trying to dance around the bush identifying it.

      The problem with Social media in general is the propensity of people to identify dangerous ideas while wearing political glasses. This makes some feel, for instance, supporting the 2nd amendment is somehow akin to advocating the killing of innocent people in mass shootings. As such, then it justifies the elimination of that kind of message from the platform. The problem is the projection of political interpretations and the use of strong and angry rhetoric into the management of the platform. Such things need to stop and platforms need to not bow to social pressure born of the news cycle in their editorial decisions.

      Where I fully understand the need for moderation of social media platforms and the social necessity of platform operators to keep things under control by putting limits in place and enforcing them, I think that platform operators need to CLEARLY define what sorts of things they will and will not allow then follow the rules they put forth strictly. Where I leave such editorial decisions up to the site owners, I would hope that operators can divorce themselves from political and social perspectives which are truly intolerant of alternate views and fall on the side of allowing folks to be offended by ideas they don't like.

      There are examples of successful moderation techniques to be gleaned from USENET of the past (or even the present). I suggest we take a look at how USENET evolved, look at what worked, what didn't and apply the lessons we learned back then. Strong moderation policies, clearly written, evenly and strictly enforced quickly worked best in my view. Social platforms of today would do well to learn from these successful efforts.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by mi · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least, he realizes, there is a bubble — with many people inside it. That's progress, no?

      He raised awareness so now the healing can begin...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    8. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      "I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole. But also because I don’t have to. I’d wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I’m talking about in their own circles—even if only in their own virtual circles. This is everywhere."

      Also fails to consider people outside these circles. Come on then, what kind of dumb ass shit are they coming out with?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    9. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I came here to say this... without any context he just sounds super pretentious. He may well be right, but good arguments are backed up with evidence, and his is not.

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
    10. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a link to an example in the blurb. Click on "Words that if they were able to take a step outside of their own heads and hear, they'd be embarrassed by."

    11. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Kohath · · Score: 2

      Not really an example.

    12. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to the author's by-line in the article:
      "General Partner @ GV (née Google Ventures). In past lives I wrote at TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and ParisLemon. A man of few words. Except when writing."

      I'm suprised to see the author is a man, because he sounds like the stereotypical wife. Apparently we're just supposed to know what he's bitching about.

    13. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The article is a result of someone trying to resolve cognitive dissonance: The rift is between realizing that Silicon Valley people say stupid things on one hand and thinking that they should be more intelligent and thus not say stupid things on the other hand. Instead of putting two and two together and understanding that Sillycon Valley people are flawed like everybody else, the author asks if there is some (external) influence that causes these displays of stupidity. Taken to the extreme, this kind of "reasoning" traditionally leads to questioning the quality of the water supply, "precious bodily fluids" style.

    14. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually self-referential ... as rule-driven tek-no SV does not need concrete examples when its algebra and logic algorithms cover all possibilities.

    15. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny
      Too bad, because you missed the key sentence:

      I’m honestly not even sure that some individuals—people I know—could pass the Turing test at this point

      This article was clearly written by a robot.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is a very common tactic in low quality opinion rags. The article is carefully worded to avoid specifics, so that the reader fills in the gaps themselves and thinks that it's about the people they personally dislike.

      Another example of this is the phrase "SJW". No-one can agree on exactly what it means, which is why it's so successful. It means whoever the reader disagrees with and thinks is an idiot, basically a cheat code to make everyone agree with you.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I think the author doesn't want to be blacklisted. Proclaiming reality -- by pointing out how some particular statements are not reality -- gets you blacklisted.

      You're a monster if you make some specific, very self-involved, very dramatic people feel bad. Meanwhile those people make everyone around them feel bad most of the time. They demand to be catered to and spend their time trying to police others' behavior. But there's a quasi-religious devotion to them. Cults look weird from the outside.

    18. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by nine-times · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.

      More like there's one throw-away line in the middle saying maybe Trump is partially to blame, and then drops the idea.

      Seems like you're being a bit sensitive. I guess he's just not being PC enough for you, and mentioning Trump hurt your feelings. He shouldn't mistreat such a delicate little snowflake.

    19. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starts off with: People in silicon valley are in a bubble.

      True statement.

      Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.

      Yeah... that basically shows the author is basically in the same bubble as the people in Silicon Valley.

      Lemme guess: The main conclusion is that the elitists in Silicon Valley aren't Pavlovianly "woke" enough, which is why they are in the bubble?

      There's absolutely nothing to the article. Here's a summary: somebody [unidentified] said some things in some SF cafes. This is all you need to know in order to comment.

    20. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by execthis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When they showed videos on the news of employees evacuating YouTube I have to say I was shocked and immediately understood how fucked up Silicon Valley is. The employees are not even close to representative of the people of the Bay Area nor of people anywhere. To say that it's a bubble is an understatement.

    21. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reference to Trump was incidental at best. Yet you've chosen to base your entire response around it. And you've got a lot of upvotes, which kind of proves the author's point.

    22. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there.

      Thanks for the chuckle.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    23. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Oh, let me try! Here is an example of everything.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    24. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      The future is autonomous cars. (it ain't gonnna happen. This is tech bro hubris, we can't make people-level AI now)
      100% robot factories are possible. (Nope. Elon figured that out.)
      The free market fixes all problems. (facepalm Pickety's Capital, Klein's Shock Doctrine)
      The Singularity is coming. (bad science fiction by people who grew up on movie sci fi)
      Everyone needs to be retrained in _______ and all will be well. We've had tech employment disruptions before and people recovered fine after; progress goes on.(Many died and will die in poverty and no one cares to notice; that's why the "data" is so optimistically skewed)

      All are not supported by anything but mutual belief and constant reinforcement.

    25. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the trump bash was so ironic, but predictable. The article had to stretch outside of it's context to land that one, and on top of that, Trump did not "get ahead by saying inane things"; he got ahead despite saying some inane things, via his actions, over the several past decades.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    26. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Starts off with: People in silicon valley are in a bubble...Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.

      Trump's reality bubble and Silicon Valley's reality bubble are two independent things, although perhaps caused by similar forces, such as too much money meets too much ego.

    27. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 2

      ^^^ THIS

      I kind of get what kind of things .. but since he's not willing to give examples I can't be sure that he and I are thinking the same things are asinine.

      The whole article is just a content-free windmill-tilting session

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    28. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs. Musk. Bezos. Zuckerberg.

      They are the pointy end of modern day cult leaders manipulating their followers and remoras for personal gain.

    29. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by nnull · · Score: 1

      I tried to read the article multiple times because I simply couldn't understand what the person is trying to talk about and thought maybe I missed something. No examples of what these people are talking about that makes them "losing touch with reality". All I got is nerds have taken over the world and it's Trumps fault.

    30. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by nwf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Spot on! The author of the article needs to realize he is in the same bubble.

      After reading the article, the author is in the bubble, sure. But unlike the people they are ranting agains, they don't appear to be actually intelligent. That article was content, fact and even anecdote free. Basically, "here's my opinion, but I'm above examples that demonstrate it."

      A new low even for slashdot.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    31. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came here to say this... without any context he just sounds super pretentious. He may well be right, but good arguments are backed up with evidence, and his is not.

      "I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole."

      He doesn't have to be an asshole. But, without examples we don't know what the hell he's talking about. It's like he lives in a bubble where he thinks everyone has the same experience as him--which ironically enough is exactly what he's complaining about.

    32. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I though when I read the summary. Trump isn't the cause, he's riding the backlash. If it wasn't him it would be someone else.

    33. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article is not very well written. He also doesn't give examples, and said as much. That said, it doesn't mean that Silicon Valley isn't a bubble of group think, weird-ass ideas, and other such things. Examples have been repeatedly satirized on HBO's "Silicon Valley," including:

      * Quit college and go live in an incubator, because you know, who cares about a well-rounded education
      * "making the world a better place"
      * "Blood Boys" and parabiosis.
      * The reverse scarlet letter syndrome with the Christian in this past week's episode
      * The Matrix as a pseudoreligion (living in a computer simulation)
      * The obsession with "the singularity"

      If you spend five minutes on twitter looking at tech people you'll see it to varying degrees.

      You have a concentration of people that are generally fairly intelligent but aren't necessarily cut out for dealing with people (nerds) trying to create a nerd paradise while being taken advantage of by much more savvy people who actually control the money. They're probably no weirder than nerds of the past, but they have the platform to broadcast their weirdness and enough money for people to take them at least somewhat seriously. Additionally, because the are living in a bubble of their own creation they assume that their intelligence in one area conveys to other areas as well.

      The "omg Trump" aspect of the article is really just related to an on-going, ever-present aspect of society. Nerds are weird and that weirdness has led to nerds being the traditional victims of bullying. This is the soft of thing that causes resentment, and that resentment is probably manifested in the desire to push "disruptive" technology which is accelerating the destabilization of the economy. The desire to "automate people out of a job" can't really be articulated without a whiff of malice to it. Perhaps there are some people that really think the world will be like Star Trek -- but remember, the world of Star Trek comes after a major global war. "AI" may have the prospect of greatly improving lives, but if not rolled out and implemented correctly, it's going to make life miserable for a whole lot of normal people. The current issues around data collection and analytics, which are stepping stones towards AI systems, is a current manifestation of that every bit as much as automating factory work away is.

      The current and future economic issues are, in large part, what drove many people to vote for Trump. His distaste for silicon valley is palpable. His goals and not those of silicon valley. His base is not aligned with silicon valley. But the Trump issue is more or less a side-show. He can be a useful stand-in for the divergence between "normal, every day Americans" and Silicon Valley types, but it's hard to say it's all about Trump.

    34. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Not really. None of them demand anything from anyone. They just build stuff that people like (except Facebook). Anyone can easily disengage with any of their companies without difficulty (except Facebook).

      You are confusing a personality with a cult. They aren't the same. Don't be shallow.

    35. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Shatrat · · Score: 1

      The article is the example, less the 'really smart people'.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    36. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The phrase "SJW" means "I'm an idiot and everything I say should be ignored". I find treating it that way works perfectly.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    37. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're messed up. It's Trump's fault. No logic. No facts. This is why we have Trump.

      Your attack on the other poster is alwat why we have Trump.

      Keep it up. You're going to get him re-elected.

    38. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only opened the comment section to look how many comments would come before the word "Trump" occurs. Good job!

    39. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article it seems self-awareness only goes as far as having to start blaming yourself.

    40. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Actually, it doesn't end with "It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble."
      Impressive how quickly got modded up to 5 Insightful for that.

      It mentions him as an example of someone who "gets forward in life by saying asinine things" and makes no further mention of him.

      More to the point, he goes on saying "I’d say the root is an increasing sense of entitlement .."

      The article is still not much of a read, but not in the way you portray it.

    41. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I thought I was the only one with a teenager like that...

    42. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by slinches · · Score: 5, Informative

      Another example of this is the phrase "SJW". No-one can agree on exactly what it means, which is why it's so successful. It means whoever the reader disagrees with and thinks is an idiot, basically a cheat code to make everyone agree with you.

      I keep hearing people claim this, but it doesn't make any sense. It has a pretty specific and widely accepted definition.

      From Urban Dictionary: "Social Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation"

      Now you may argue that some abuse the pejorative nature of the term to undermine legitimate advocacy for social causes, but the term itself is not poorly defined. And arguing about who should be considered an SJW is idiotic anyway. It's like trying to draw distinct boundaries around who is and who isn't a fuckwad.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    43. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never been with a woman, have you?

      And no, hookers and tinder hookups don't count.

    44. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The phrase "SJW" means "I'm an idiot and everything I say should be ignored". I find treating it that way works perfectly.

      This is why I refer to people that say "the best candidate should get the job is a racist phrase" as racist idiots and avoid using the term SJW and its baggage =). Here's a list of this sort of garbage... provided by an American university: http://sph.umn.edu/site/docs/hewg/microaggressions.pdf

    45. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      The reason it's so malleable is that definition is extremely open-ended.

      What if it's not for raising their own reputation? They actually care about the issue whether or not it helps their reputation. Now you get to exclude them from the SJW bucket. Same with the "shallow" clause and even "vehemently".

      Under that defintion, you get to call the people you disagree with SJWs, and the people you agree with are not SJWs because of all of the escape valves.

    46. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My favourite example of how no-one can agree what an SJW is would be this clip from Star Trek The Next Generation: https://youtu.be/Xn5-iG6FX58

      It's from the episode "The Drumhead", in which an investigator comes to uncover a conspiracy on the Enterprise. She ends up turning it into a witch hunt, reminiscent of the McCarthy era. Picard shuts her down with a brilliant speech.

      The title of the video is "Triggered SJW Attacks Picard, Instantly Regrets It". The person who posted it seems to think that the investigator is the SJW, but many of the comments think it is Picard. The investigator cares little for social justice, she just wants to root out enemies of the Federation. Picard wants to protect the mixed-race guy she picks on, and on the whole his character is known for wrestling with moral issues and having a strong commitment to justice.

      So is an SJW just someone who annoys you, or an authoritarian, or someone acting unreasonably, or is there some set of qualities that defines them? And if the latter, how come it's nor Picard, a guy who literally fights for social justice at times?

      The phrase is completely meaningless, but people think they know what it means so you can use it and expect your audience to nod along regardless of whether they actually agree with you or not.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    47. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      100% robot factories are possible. (Nope. Elon figured that out.)

      This might be better phrased as "practical" instead of "possible". They're entirely possible. They're also not the most efficient way to run a factory right now.

    48. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup, 100% correct.

      It's peppered with shit like "increasingly everywhere", "the most brilliant people in the world", and the fucking closer " the tech industry has grown in stature to become the most important from a fiscal perspective and arguably from a cultural perspective as well.".

      This person is just now waking up to the fact that their own farts stink. Silicon Valley has been like this for well over a decade. I'm glad people are realizing it, but to say that this is just starting or increasing is bullshit. We've been at peak Silicon Valley Douchebag for the past couple of years. To pin it to CA is ridiculous. To claim that these clowns are the most brilliant people in the world is insulting. As is claiming the tech industry is the most important industry.

      The person writing this is fully in the Silicon Valley bubble of bullshit.

    49. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by j33px0r · · Score: 1

      I disagree about the low part. I've been having a bit of fun reading the comments, yours included =)

    50. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odd. I was totally, 100%, on the same wavelength as the author. And I would thought that most of Slashdot would understand what he's talking about.

      I'm not even in the industry, nor do I have a Slashdot account. (I am part computer nerd though, and have been a long time reader.)

    51. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's complaining about Trump's particularly effective use of the *Dead Cat Strategy*. Yeah, it works everywhere. But let's complain about Trump, instead of speculating on why it works so well. Well, hell! We should blame Howard Stern (the best dead cat strategist of modern times) for making Trump a household name.

    52. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by HatofPig · · Score: 1

      Another example of this is the phrase "SJW". No-one can agree on exactly what it means, which is why it's so successful. It means whoever the reader disagrees with and thinks is an idiot, basically a cheat code to make everyone agree with you.

      Well the term derives from "keyboard warrior" so we can narrow it down a little bit. Being the digital-media equivalent of a squeeky wheel, producing a surplus amount of noise, commotion, and drama on-line is certainly a defining factor. So "social justice" just qualifies the particular bent.

      --
      Silicon & Charybdis McLuhan Kildall Papert Kay
    53. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      While I'm happy enough blaming lots and lots of things on Trump, I don't see that he contributed to that particular bubble of thought. He has contributed to some, but quite unlike Silicon Valley's.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    54. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the real problem is that we're talking about humans. Washington, D.C. has been in a bubble for a long time (and pretty well satisfies your list of adjectives in many ways), and the millennials don't have the power there.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That trash came from a Big 10 university? I am a sad panda. Shame on you U of Minny.

    56. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 0

      Your definition doesn't seem to match the intended use, as SJW is an epithet right-wingers use about left-wingers. Slashdot is an excellent place to find right-wingers who fit that definition.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    57. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if it's not for raising their own reputation? They actually care about the issue whether or not it helps their reputation. Now you get to exclude them from the SJW bucket. Same with the "shallow" clause and even "vehemently".

      Well we have a word for that: activist.

    58. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Oh? If Steve Jobs is somehow managing to still "manipulate his followers and remoras", for his personal gain or any other reason... from beyond the grave... then perhaps it's entirely justified to treat him as a revered figure and for Apple to be tax-exempt. After all, we've extended that courtesy to the last guy documented to have pulled off that feat for about two millennia now.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    59. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel as if the entire article was taken from the Joe Paggs radio show and only the last snippet about Trump was their own thought.

    60. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I read Slashdot for the comments. They're usually at least entertaining, and sometimes very enlightening.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I used to have "Studying to pass the Turing Test" somewhere as a tagline.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    62. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by slinches · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, great example. Obviously the investigator lady is the fuckwad because she looks more wad-shaped.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    63. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youtube comments (and I include the person who put up the video) have as much as credibility a source as random blog posts. I mean, if I gave you a bunch of youtube videos of say Sargon of Akkad, or some MGTOW channel, or some pro-GamerGate youtuber, would you take them as credible? No.

      You're like some alt-right who links to some random Brietbart article proving him how his nutjob conspiracies are so true.

    64. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      See, immediately modded as troll. No one can agree, and even questioning it triggers some people.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    65. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      From my point of view, you're also identifying dangerous ideas while wearing political glasses. There are a lot of people who'd describe themselves as Second Amendment defenders who are way over the top, hurling vituperation at anyone they think disagrees with them, for example.

      Remember that Usenet was a small group of mostly educated people at its most successful, and I was around for some debates on whether it (or the Internet) could be used for commercial purposes. Modern social media are businesses. The sort of moderation you advocate (which, FWIW, seems reasonable to me) will either be more or less profitable than the sort of moderation now in place, and I figure the free market can sort it out eventually.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    66. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      Then they are still idiots. Just because you actually care about something doesn't make it any less shallow or petty. It still just as shallow and petty, and you are just to stupid to notice it.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    67. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      I came here to say this... without any context he just sounds super pretentious. He may well be right, but good arguments are backed up with evidence, and his is not.

      Agreed. He starts with a premise we can all agree with, then loses everyone by blaming Trump.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    68. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your definition doesn't seem to match the intended use, as SJW is an epithet right-wingers use about left-wingers.

      So... you're disagreeing with AmiMojo that the term has no meaning? If you can identify what kinds of people tend to use the term, then you can derive what the term means to a more narrow definition

      Slashdot is an excellent place to find right-wingers who fit that definition.

      Not really. Slashdot is mostly libertarian. The crowd may share many values as the right (e.g gun rights), but that's because (at least of late) libertarians share many values with the right (e.g gun rights)

      But on other issues, slashdot has some clear differences.

      For example, slashdot objects to the attack on video games from BOTH the right and the left (the Jack Thompsons and Anita Sarkeesians)

      Slashdot is also more concerned on issues related to copyright and piracy than traditional left or right wing. Ditto concerns on online privacy (we kinda knew Facebook and co were bad news long before the recent debacles). Ditto crypto-currenies and their effects on societies/economies/governments.

      On abortion, slashdot isn't as gung ho as the right in being pro-life. The bigger concern is over having the state/taxpayers pay for other people's abortions. Ditto gay rights.

    69. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dude is fucking NYC real estate mogul. He's about as non-SV as you can be. And, SV has been retarded for years. Has it gotten more retarded since the election? Yes.

    70. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by gtall · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could practice your reading comprehension. He said it "Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump".

      Well, if the U.S. President gets away with saying asinine things most of his life, and still gets to be President, others merely note what works and do likewise. Advertising works.

    71. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shit does 'pavlovianly' mean in this context?

    72. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is a salient critique on the meaninglessness of the left "activism" in capitalist Silicon Valley. See, SV is vacuous.

    73. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get butt-hurt when people say SJW as an insult? You shouldn't, it is an insult. The idea of "Social Justice" is comical at best, and criminal at worst, to anyone who can think critically. There is either justice or in-justice. "Social Justice" is not justice, therefore it is injustice.

    74. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      - The future is autonomous cars.

      They will slowly gain popularity. Human-driven cars will never pass away, but slowly give way, becoming the same sort of niche as horses are nowadays. But it's a matter of good several decades. Likely not our lifetime.

      - 100% robot factories are possible.

      95% robot factories are possible currently, though not entirely economically viable. We still lack robots that can repair robots, or build robots nearly from scratch, and even then it will be maybe 99.5% robot factory. There's always the unforeseen that requires a human. Regardless, the shift will occur, slowly. Again, unlikely to happen within our lifetime.

      - The free market fixes all problems

      Bullshit. Pure free market is just as utopian as pure utopian communism.

      - The Singularity is coming.

      Unlikely to happen within our lifetimes.

      - Everyone needs to be retrained in _______ and all will be well.

      Retraining reduces the causalities. It's not a solution, just a somewhat weak mitigating factor.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    75. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      I gave up reading this excuse for an article when they failed to cite a single example of what they were talking about. I mean, the author talks of the danger of being inside a little bubble, but demonstrates precisely the same failing when they say (I shit you not):

      I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole. But also because I don’t have to. I’d wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I’m talking about in their own circles—even if only in their own virtual circles. This is everywhere.

      I mean, talk about fucking irony. No mate, I don't know. Spell it out or admit you're just bouncing around your own little bubble.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    76. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appeal to sexual experience is a fallacy.

    77. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    78. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Spot on! The author of the article needs to realize he is in the same bubble.

      Note the lack of specific examples, with the phony pretext of not wanting to offend anyone by citing some.

    79. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by losfromla · · Score: 1

      I guess you think everyone lives in your bubble too... "..., then loses everyone by blaming Trump"

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    80. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by losfromla · · Score: 1

      On the whole slashdot is about fat neckbeards who like to eat cheetos and drink mountain dew. They prefer freedom to be addicted or "entertained" by porn and video games.

      The left is very much more for privacy as are slashdotters other than the copious russian trolls, whereas the right (neocons nowadays) are for whatever looks like strong anti-crime posturing.

      I think that most slashdotters (other than recent arrivals/russian trolls) are much more on the left than on the right. Similar to the makeup of Silicon Valley and other thinking regions.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    81. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by bobbied · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I was citing an example from the current news cycle.

      Where I make no apology for my political views, I DO expect that others would recognize the issue from my example. Personally, I welcome discussions which originate from widely varying political perspectives, even ones I find offensive.

      The real problem here is how folks define "tolerance" as being "don't offend anybody." That's not tolerance, it's something else. Tolerance is knowing that it's OK to be offended by someone else's perspective and even express that you are offended, while letting folks be dead wrong if they insist. True tolerance recognizes that I'm responsible only for myself because I have no control over you. I can get angry about your stupidity and even tell you why I'm angry, but I cannot stop you if you won't listen.

      Social media platforms have been trying to filter out offense... Something that I firmly believe is impossible.. But that's another topic..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    82. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I spent a good five minutes following links just to get to the "I wont provide examples line" and then felt baited

    83. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Ms mash's views are kind of mish mashed together

    84. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by farble1670 · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Perhaps the real problem is that we are talking about (generation x+1), and in the valley they are all entitled, vapid, egoistic, victimistic, not actually all that intelligent, drug-addled and privileged clods with the emotional maturity of something growing in a petri dish. The post actually serves of a fantastic demonstration of what is wrong, just not for the intended reasons. Self-awareness, much?

      Fixed. This has been said about the next generation since the dawn of society. Yet somehow things go on and remain about the same.

    85. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

      It's a blog post masquerading as an article. But them again Slashdot is pretty much just the beauhd msmash retweet list.

    86. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by unrtst · · Score: 1

      I also came here to say this, and have mod points, but both you and GP are already modded up :-)

      I'd like to take it a step further and ask why the editors allowed it on the front page?

    87. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I don't really perceive SV as any further out of touch than any other region.

      All types are susceptible to it (likely I'm totally out of touch too).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    88. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by eaglesrule · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's some great logic.

      mod up: heads, I win

      mod down: tails, you lose.

      Oh, and overuse of playing the victim card is another trait of a SJW. Yes, that was a microaggression.

    89. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read what Scott Adams has to say about "Cognitive Dissonance" it might be fairly easy using that technique to get some of these absurd positions to collapse of there own weight.

    90. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't even provide examples. Waste of time.

    91. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      See, immediately modded as troll. No one can agree, and even questioning it triggers some people.

      I'm pretty sure you've got a small group of followers who follow your posting history and spend their mod points modding down whatever you're talking about.

    92. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I read the summaries for the topic/headline, I read Slashdot comments to figure out what's really going on.

    93. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The problem with a cult of personality is that it often doesn't just go away even when the founder dies.
      Hell, when Heaven's Gate had its mass suicide in 1997, they left two people behind to run their website and handle public relations. 21 years later and they're STILL believing adherents, still answering questions about the cult and keeping the website operational.

    94. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some great logic.

      mod up: heads, I win

      mod down: tails, you lose.

      That's what you get for admitting to abusing the moderation system. Nobody trusts you.

      It's like crying wolf. You do that, and don't deliver a wolf, sooner or later, people stop believing you.

      Oh, and overuse of playing the victim card is another trait of a SJW. Yes, that was a microaggression.

      That's a trait of right-wing self-martyrdom, bringing up the victim card. Yes, that is a hallmark of conservative whining.

    95. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit the nail on the head in the sense that the article is its own example of saying 'dump shit'. In this case specifically he's in a 'bubble' in thinking that the people reading the article are IN the bubble he's trying to expose, which means he's in the same bubble & thus said 'dumb shit' about "not giving examples because I'm not an asshole"...you are not an asshole for pointing out stupid shit people say unless of course you're in the Silicon Valley Bubble where pointing out dumb shit people say is 'wrong'.

      Saying stupid shit and not being called out on it is what generates the bubble to begin with.

    96. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger concern is over having the state/taxpayers pay for other people's abortions.

      LOL. I remember when the right was doing its full-court press against birth-control beinh covered by insurance. You know, something that prevents pregnancy and abortion.

      But do pretend there is some madcap plan to pay for abortions oit there. That will totally be hilarious.

    97. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by gweihir · · Score: 1

      While Trump is only a somewhat good example of this (he lacks the "really smart" part), he is basically just a symptom. After all, he did not vote himself into office (although no doubt he would have done that if possible). No, the problem is a more general one. "Smart" is over, people want simple recipes (sure to fail) because they a) have been screwed over too often but b) they do not understand how that actually did work. The problem is that complex recipes also often fail (but have a chance of actually working) and that, time and again, they have been promised far more than could ever have been given. There is ample historic precedent for this situation and none of it good.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    98. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new owners of Slashdot bought the domain but aren't really in touch with their user base. They keep posting articles like this one that make us look at them like they are complete morons.

    99. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook, Google, and Twitter.

      The only other abusive cult-like company that's really drawn my attention would be Uber if you're a woman.

    100. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Millennials are actually entitled an vapid in a way no previous generation has been.

      I've been a hiring manager of one sort or another for 20 years hiring people both younger and older than myself.

      It's only now that meeting young people has become depressing and managing these useless sacks of meat has become difficult.

    101. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the SJW.

      It's fairly simple though. SJWs like chips come in many flavors.

      Self hating white people.
      People that use the words "people of colour"
      Anyone that hates men.
      etc, etc

    102. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The future is autonomous cars. (it ain't gonnna happen. This is tech bro hubris, we can't make people-level AI now)

      Google already did it.

      100% robot factories are possible. (Nope. Elon figured that out.)

      Panasonic has had "lights out" factories making TVs for a couple of decades now.

      The rest is accurate though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    103. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all words need a strict definition. What does it mean to be German? You could flippantly start to talk about citizenship, but a German who'd move to the US today to naturalise would still be a German and probably for quite a long while. So what does it mean? People might start to talk about punctuality, about sausages and beer, about culture and music, about cultural heritage, about values, about persistently counter-productive environmentalism, about ways of life, about self-reflection and rationality, about trying to live independently, self-sufficiently and fairly, about Fußball or postwar guilt, about pride in the legal system, and thousands of other things. And you'd find Germans not fitting in the pattern regardless. Yet there clearly is a German people, Germans exist and the word German isn't meaningless.

    104. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you've got a small group of followers who follow your posting history and spend their mod points modding down whatever you're talking about.

      It's probably antifa. Once they think you're a fascist, they think it's perfectly ok to harass you wherever you go.

      Why do they think AmiMojo is a fascist? Who knows. There isn't a good definition for what antifa considers a fascists (haha, just like "SJW")

    105. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      From an intellectual point of view, I agree with you on "offense". You have a perfect right to be offended by what I say, and I have a perfect right to snicker about it. However, if a business gets a lot of offended customers, they're likely to lose a lot of potential revenue. Social media therefore has to try to cut down on the amount of potentially offensive material their customer base sees, or they'll be replaced by another company that does. People who take political opinions much more personally than you or me have money too.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    106. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. (BTW: I was once a headhunter in Si Valley in the early 80's) I think the author is simply stoned, burned out, and is still hooked enough he HAS to at least partly blame Trump.....
      (And BTW: I voted for Trump. Thought he was a bit of a rule/law follower, something this place has been sorely lacking for decades. And that old crowd still isn't quite believing ... and are starting to triplehook jig themselves out of the pond...)

    107. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, we have reached the crux of the matter. Tolerance and intolerance. Are social media platforms going to bow to the intolerance of others?

      It is intolerance to take offense and then take it out on the platform and the speaker, where tolerance just walks away. The way platforms deal with this is to allow the virtual version of walking away, not filtering content on their own initiative, but leaving that up to individual users to do themselves.

      Platforms can filter content based on clear rules (Say like "No Prorn", "No for sale ads", "No advocating violence on individuals or groups") but other than that, anything goes, but individual users will have the choice to not see stuff they don't like (or cannot handle). The idea is to allow the exercise of tolerance, not just avoidance of offense.

      But again... the issue is how tolerance has been redefined by some groups, and how they leverage this to unfairly control the debate...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    108. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the real problem is that we're talking about humans. Washington, D.C. has been in a bubble for a long time, and the millennials don't have the power there.

      What are you talking about? The USG literally runs on 22-28 year olds. You cram a bunch of them into a DC office and [ removal of ] { policy | regulation | propaganda } comes out, with cynical 30-somethings as a byproduct.

    109. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So... you're disagreeing with AmiMojo that the term has no meaning?

      I'm pointing out that the Urban Dictionary definition cited above is bipartisan.

      Not really. Slashdot is mostly libertarian.

      Slashdot's a lot more varied than that. There are Trump supporters, and Trump isn't libertarian. He appeals to the far right, the nihilists, and the gullible. There's a fair number of us leftists.

      For example, slashdot objects to the attack on video games from BOTH the right and the left (the Jack Thompsons and Anita Sarkeesians)

      I was against violent video games before I started seriously looking at the evidence. They don't see to harm people in general, and some people find them fun. I'm not convinced that the right and the left are united against video games (except for the complaints all my life about anything teens find to do that isn't sex or drugs).

      Slashdot is also more concerned on issues related to copyright and piracy than traditional left or right wing. Ditto concerns on online privacy

      Yeah, and not that long ago I was about to wax eloquent about H-1B visas when I realized nobody in the room was likely to know or care. Slashdot is quite sensitive to issues that affect software developers.

      Ditto crypto-currenies and their effects on societies/economies/governments.

      If what you mean to say is that a lot of us have fairly strong opinions, sure. If you're trying to imply any trace of consensus, you're wrong.

      The bigger concern is over having the state/taxpayers pay for other people's abortions. Ditto gay rights.

      And all those who think it's murder and all those who think it's part of health care and should be paid for like other health care should be. I'm fine with my tax dollars going to help people with psoriasis or depression; why not those who need abortions?

      As far as gay rights, why would treating them like everybody else cost money? I don't think that oppressing them to improve other people's financial positions would be popular here.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    110. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pointing out that the Urban Dictionary definition cited above is bipartisan.

      Well, that too would also disagree with AmiMojo's idea that there isn't a good definition for the term.

      But on the topic of UD's definition, I wouldn't say it is bipartisan. When people "argue about" something, and "for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation", that usually means they're arguing FOR something, as the usual way to gain reputation with a person/group is to find common things you both like/support, not something you both hate/are against.

      This is why politicians often word their agendas in the positive, where they're "for" something. You don't go as far shouting "I hate gays" or "I hate guns" as "I'm for family values" or "I'm for protecting our children".

      And when it comes to topics of social justice, it's largely the left who positions themselves as "for" one social justice cause or another. The right on the other hand argues against it, unafraid to say they're against social justice.

      To equate the two would be like saying the antifa who punched a fascist is just as bad as the fascist.

      Slashdot's a lot more varied than that.

      That's why I said "mostly".

      I'm not convinced that the right and the left are united against video games

      Well, I didn't say they were. My point was that both the left and right have attacked video games, and wherever it came from, slashdot (mostly) were against those attacks.

      I'm fine with my tax dollars going to help people with psoriasis or depression; why not those who need abortions?

      I don't think they are comparable. Pregnancies aren't exactly a disease. It's actually of part of the ritual that propagates the species.

      As far as gay rights, why would treating them like everybody else cost money?

      That assumes "treating them like everybody else" is all society has to do. It isn't. Legislation of protected classes and enforcement of those laws aren't free.

    111. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Hiring for 20 years. That means you've mostly been hiring gen X, and a few gen Ys (millennials). So that qualifies you to judge them as the most vapid generation ever?

      What you're doing is judging your generation (the best) against subsequent generations. Each of which becomes increasingly to associate with and therefore understand. It's a classic psychological phenomenon. Society changes and and younger people get increasingly "different". That gets uncomfortable and it's easier just blame them for being inferior in some way then change ourselves.

    112. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The title of the video is "Triggered SJW Attacks Picard, Instantly Regrets It". The person who posted it seems to think that the investigator is the SJW, but many of the comments think it is Picard.

      The title is clearly tongue-in-cheek. The commenters who point out that Picard is fighting for "social justice" clearly miss the point; Picard isn't an SJW, he's just fighting for equality. Whereas (as another commenter points out) if you replace the word "Romulan" with"White Male" in the diatribes of the inquisitor she ends up sounding indistinguishable from a modern day SJW.

      SJWs don't give a shit about actual equality; they care about identity politics. In that sense they have more in common with white nationalists than they do with rational human beings. The only difference lies in which races/groups they see as having more value.

    113. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      if you replace the word "Romulan" with"White Male" in the diatribes of the inquisitor she ends up sounding indistinguishable from a modern day SJW.

      That doesn't make any sense. White males are a majority in the US, for example, where as half Romulans in the Federation are a tiny minority. Picard is defending the minority against someone who is suspicious because one of his parents was foreign born, and a member of a race who is perceived as untrustworthy and devious by many in the Federation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    114. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be fairly obvious what's going on there: SJW has two different components two it. The first is specific beliefs about social justice, some of which are highly civilized, some of which concern what to do and think about people who disagree with you. The second is a set of behaviors that are mainly inspired by the less civilized set of beliefs that SJWs hold, and this is where the hate for SJWs come in. Picard shares many of the civilized concerns that SJWs have, but he is diametrically opposed to them in his actions and in how he believes other people who don't agree with him 100% should be treated. The interrogator has few of the civilized beliefs of the SJWs, but shares their outlook on how to approach conflict. So in that specific situation, of course there is going to be confusion, since both sides of that conflict has some of the properties of SJWs, and so you can focus on either aspect. Doesn't make the term itself confused though, just that application of it requires some finesse to understand. Though SJW isn't really apt here, for how this works out is that the interrogator gets too explicit about saying what she is doing, realizes that what she is doing is horrible and then withdraws in shame. SJWs would never withdraw from shame.

    115. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're complaining about too many American men or too many non-Americans. I.e. I can't tell if you're a left-wing bigot or a right-wing bigot.

    116. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Well there's your problem; you see everything in terms of minority-vs-majority rather than looking at the actions of the individuals involved. No wonder it doesn't make any sense to you; you're an SJW.

    117. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      When your argument comes down to accusing me of what you just did and then calling me an SJW, that means you lost.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    118. Re: Idiot post about Silicon Valley by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize we were having a competition; I thought I was trying to explain to you why you misunderstood the video.

    119. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Well, that too would also disagree with AmiMojo's idea that there isn't a good definition for the term.

      I was unaware that AmiMoJo had endorsed the Urban Dictionary definition introduced by slinches. In any case, the UD definition is potentially useful.

      And when it comes to topics of social justice, it's largely the left who positions themselves as "for" one social justice cause or another. The right on the other hand argues against it, unafraid to say they're against social justice.

      Not in my observation. Their are plenty of people around here who object to paying taxes or losing privilege on the basis of justice. Since they're arguing about society, I'd call that social justice. It differs a lot from my idea of it, but it seems to qualify.

      Pregnancies aren't exactly a disease. It's actually of part of the ritual that propagates the species.

      Pregnancies can kill. I had a co-worker whose wife just barely survived. All sorts of things can go wrong. I really don't see the difference between paying for abortions and paying for depression treatment myself. Are you sure your objections are strictly because you don't want to pay for medical procedures, of certain types?

      That assumes "treating [gays] like everybody else" is all society has to do. It isn't. Legislation of protected classes and enforcement of those laws aren't free.

      If people treated gays just like everybody else, they wouldn't be a protected class anywhere. Protected classes are in response to discrimination.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    120. Re:Idiot post about Silicon Valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, we have reached the crux of the matter. Tolerance and intolerance

      That's not the crux of the matter. The crux is profits, since we're talking about private corporations here. Social media platforms are going to do what they think brings in the most profit.

      This isn't anything new, either. It's easier now to disseminate things most people think wrong than it ever has been. In the past, platforms have had to deal with limited resources. A newspaper letters to the editor column might be a third of a page, with an extra page on Saturday. They could be, and often were, arbitrary in what they printed. It's easy to get a blog going these days with minimal or no restrictions on what you can say.

      You're coming up with some ideal solution that won't work in practice, sort of like Communism or Libertarianism. Most people will prefer to have their content curated, rather than having to deal with, say, neo-Nazi trolls one at a time. Therefore, they will tend to use the social media that filter that sort of stuff out before they see it. That social media will therefore make more money and outcompete your idea of what social media should be like. It's a straight business decision. You know, the sort of decision the right wingers and libertarians have been insisting that government and idealism should keep their noses out from.

      But again... the issue is how tolerance has been redefined by some groups, and how they leverage this to unfairly control the debate...

      ,p> No, the issue is that some people have no idea how to present their ideas without offending the people social media make money on, and call for intervention in corporate business affairs to compensate for that. Feel free to start up a social media site that's run as you want it to be run. That's how this sort of thing works in a free market.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  2. Consider this by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That perhaps the real problem is that YOU are measuring reality differently than they are.

    They're measuring reality with the relentless mathematics of financial analysis.

    Your metric may simply be different.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They're measuring reality with the relentless mathematics of financial analysis.

      I see no evidence of that.

      When I see companies that lose money get valued for billions of dollars, it's obvious that those people need a reality check. They say they are buying growth but they are extrapolating out to infinity; meaning it is impossible for a company to grow as fast as they think it will.

      They pay obscene amounts for earnings when they do arise that I look and just think, they'd be better off buying CDs from a bank.

      Silly Valley people think that their values are shared by the world. For instance the delusion that everyone wants an electric car. I live in a Waffle House state, if it doesn't go VROOOOM! and spew noxious gases, it's for one of dem thar Caleeefornia Librul fags. An electric truck? Not in our lifetimes.

      And then there's their complete misunderstanding of innovation is. They seem to think they are the centers of innovation in the World when the opposite is the case now.

      And the ridiculous hero worship of Elon Musk. That South African hustler has got them all fooled.

      Silly Valley is a parody of itself now.

    2. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't really doing that though. None of these companies ever goes bankrupt in the traditional sense. If they fuck things up too bad, some other company will buy them for their IP or their employees and they'll get to keep going. Meanwhile, the rest of us are left with the consequences of their nonsense.

    3. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoah, so I live in an alternate reality??

    4. Re:Consider this by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      When I see companies that lose money get valued for billions of dollars, it's obvious that those people need a reality check.

      The mistake here is assuming their financial analysis is the same as yours.

      Their company is losing lots of money. They get a shitload of capital anyway and pay themselves ungodly amounts of money in cash and stock.

      That sounds like excellent financial analysis if the goal is to personally acquire lots of wealth while playing with "interesting" toys. You're evaluating it based on running a long-term successful business, so you get a different answer.

    5. Re:Consider this by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The fact that they are getting valued for billions of dollars and you are not, perhaps means they know something you don't.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Consider this by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Which counts as a success, by their financial analysis, right? After all, they got bought out, which was the goal.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Consider this by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1
      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no. Most buyouts are for much less than the value the VCs/investors put into the company. Fund a company for $60 million, and when it finally collapses watch it get bought for $6 million.

    9. Re:Consider this by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Oh, the attraction on the part of the people running the company is obvious. However, to have all that money to do fun things with, they need to scare up some investors. GP, I believe, is talking about people investing in these things.

      Now, it's reasonable to throw money at start-ups, figuring that most will go bust but that the others are likely to more than make up for that, but we're not talking about startups. It's reasonable to not pay attention to P/E when one expects the company to grow rapidly. However, a smart investor will want some prospect of reaching a good P/E in the not-too-distant future. Not that long ago, Tesla had an incredibly large market cap. At that price, it wasn't going to get enough earnings to make the P/E reasonable for a long, long time, assuming everything went really well for them.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, my metric is highly standardized, controlled and predictably based on the power of 10, thank you very much. I'd say it's yours which may vary. Is it base 3 or 12 today, or is something else? :>

    11. Re:Consider this by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      If you want to talk P/E ratio, you can find unreasonable numbers everywhere. Just look at Caterpillar with a P/E ratio of 123 or Coca-Cola at 151. They're about as non-Sillicon Valley as companies can be.

    12. Re:Consider this by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Yup, and those are old established companies without prospects for dramatic improvements in revenue. The stock market can stay irrational for a long time (in the old quote, longer than you can stay solvent).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    13. Re:Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please do not make fun of people for not liking electric cars. Remember that the electric car requires an infrastructure, which only exists some places... for example, my daily commute is 56 miles. I could only recharge at my home, my work has no rechargers and none are within 50 miles of where I work. The electric cars with range to do my daily commute cost about 2 times what I think reasonable to pay for a car.

      So, I do not have an electric car.

      I am absolutely certain that there are other people that make the same decision I made based on facts other than 'vroominess' and noxious fume spewing abilities.

  3. Person in bubble by TimMD909 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems that a person in a bubble is aware enough to notice other people's bubbles but not his/her own bubble.

    1. Re:Person in bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems that a person in a bubble is aware enough to notice other people's bubbles but not his/her own bubble.

      Ah, reminds me of a Bible verse (eye speck/plank lesson). Maybe this isn't a new problem. Maybe its not a Silicon Valley problem. Maybe it's a people problem.

    2. Re:Person in bubble by technosaurus · · Score: 1

      Its called the "Bubble Paradox"

    3. Re:Person in bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How DARE you use your bubble of religiosity to foist your views on me!!!!

  4. Sooo.... by olsmeister · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess the point here is that people cannot have their own opinions, or opinions that are different from yours?

    1. Re:Sooo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Damn, talk about illustrating the point.

      Have all the opinions you want.

      Society functions because we all agree that there are things that are ok and things that aren't. These peope are breaking the social contract (in it's most basic form: don't fuck people over) and don't even realise it. Worse, they think they are breaking new ground and helping society. Most people that behave this way don't think that they are normal and are helping. It's fucked up.

    2. Re:Sooo.... by Kohath · · Score: 1

      These peope are breaking the social contract (in it's most basic form: don't fuck people over) and don't even realise it. Worse, they think they are breaking new ground and helping society. Most people that behave this way don't think that they are normal and are helping. It's fucked up.

      Some of them realize they're fucking people over. They just don't care because [reasons]. Smart people can be very good at finding justifications for hurting others.

      Not like they need to try very hard. "Trump" seems to be accepted as an all-purpose justification for whatever. No matter what you do, one hater group or another will take your side if you did it because "Trump".

  5. Not just the valley. by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First world countries that think Internet Outages are a disaster and where priorities are selfies and self-driving cars and toilets with LEDs in them ...

    1. Re:Not just the valley. by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 2

      People who have jobs know that internet outages are just as crippling as power outages. Minor disasters.

      --
      "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
    2. Re:Not just the valley. by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, internet junkies are just like F18 pilots. Both freak out when they find NO CARRIER.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re: Not just the valley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking of an internet outage as any kind of disaster shows your privilege, bro!

    4. Re:Not just the valley. by ath1901 · · Score: 2

      But, that's the thing. Who really IS in touch with reality?

      Have you bought an an ice cream over the last year? You could have bought mosquito nets for poor people living in Malaria ridden countries instead. Do you really value your own sweet tooth more than the lives of others? What about speeding while driving? There's mostly a psychological benefit to you but an increased real risk to anyone around you.

      Humans are not in touch with reality (whatever "in touch" would mean). We care much more about local things than distant things. We make decisions based on impulses and apply rationalizations afterwards (but only if asked for it). We all create filter bubbles by having "friends", i.e. people who attribute social status to more or less the same things like you do (money, charity work, veganism, patriotism etc).

      I guess it is possible to be more "in touch" but that takes a lot hard work, more than most of us have time for. For example, I imagine Hans Rosling was more "in touch" than most but that was his full time job. Also, I don't know if it had any effect on a personal level. Maybe he both ate ice cream and drove too fast.

    5. Re:Not just the valley. by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      What part of "An Internet outage means I can't work" is so difficult for you to understand?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:Not just the valley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sit here in central PA and it is like a different world from what I read on Slashdot.

      Life for me has hardly changed in the last 25 years. We got AOL in 1994 or so. I got a tablet in late 2012 and a smartphone in late 2014. That's pretty much it.

      No electric or CNG cars. No 3D printing or maker movement stuff anywhere. None of those fancy payment devices that were supposed to replace swiping a credit card. No Uber/Lyft (forget any of these hyped commuter rail projects either). No choice of internet beyond overpriced cable or slow DSL. No telecommuting jobs. No online ordered store pickup except the now-defunct Toys R Us; everything else everywhere else is perpetually out of stock. AI sends the same dumb scattershot spam to my inbox as my mailbox. Nothing works better or faster or cheaper despite how much "progress" is shoved down our throats by the media. It's like, take the world I knew in 1994, change out the calendars, and that's it, you're done. All of this stuff is still fantasy sci-fi. If anything, it's a slow decline, like what they depicted at the beginning of Interstellar. Except we don't have some global extinction event in progress, just lazy indifference.

    7. Re:Not just the valley. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      We care much more about local things than distant things.

      And this is perfectly reasonable. I know what's going on with me. I can make decisions that immediately affect myself. If I were to try to improve things in parts of Africa where people have a lot more urgent needs than I do, I could send money personally, and apply a teeny amount of political influence In neither case do I have solid confidence that I'm actually helping. There are enough well-meant charitable actions that screw things up more than they help. Technically, I could go to an impoverished area myself, but considering my health and skills I don't know how much good that would do.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    8. Re:Not just the valley. by Alsn · · Score: 1

      An internet outage for me means that I can't access the medical journals of my patients. If they say "oh, allergies? Yeah there was this antibiotic this one time, but I don't know which one" an internet outage is a dangerous thing indeed.

    9. Re: Not just the valley. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking that an internet outage is NOT a disaster shows YOUR privilege, bro.

    10. Re:Not just the valley. by citylivin · · Score: 1

      I'd say if you have clean water, access to food, shelter and sanitation of some sort, then you are not truly in a disaster situation. In the classical sense of the word of course.

      By your rationale, camping would be a minor disaster.

      Maybe it is for you. But in my reality, that is quite sad.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    11. Re:Not just the valley. by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      By your rationale, camping would be a minor disaster.

      That's not a great comparison. The only reason camping is usually not is because people prepare for it. If I tossed you into the middle of the Rocky Mountains without warning, you'd be in a life-or-death situation by nightfall.

      I don't know exactly how much the modern supply chain relies on the internet, but if it was out for more than a couple of days, I think we will start seeing empty shelves in the grocery stores. Banks also use it extensively, so unless you have a whole lot of cash under your mattress, money's going to be a problem too. I doubt many people will die, but calling it "minor disaster" does seem appropriate.

  6. I would be embarrassed... by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I typed that much without saying anything or making a point.

    1. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've found most Medium.com posts seem to be like this.

    2. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Headw1nd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is spot on. The author simply repeats conventional wisdom as if it were an insight, without adding anything concrete or actionable.

    3. Re:I would be embarrassed... by geek · · Score: 1

      Its called the Encyclopedia Dramatica. 20,000 pages of nothing to give a shit about.

    4. Re:I would be embarrassed... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Apparently he's been infected with whatever is plaguing Silicon Valley.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Bender1001 · · Score: 1

      At first I thought I was missing the point of the "article" but you got it right there. Actually created an account to reply because disappointed this kind of content made it to the top.

    6. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. At least steemit posts tend to gush about how great steemit is. medium.com doesn't have even that!

    7. Re:I would be embarrassed... by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 1

      Never more relevant!

      "Whatever you say, say nothing
      When you talk about you know what
      For if you know who could hear you
      You know what you'd get
      For they'd take you off to you know where
      For you wouldn't know how long
      So for you know who's sake
      Don't let anyone hear you singing this song "

      (Song continues)

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    8. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Medium.com - Neither rare nor well done. At least they're honest about their mediocrity.

    9. Re:I would be embarrassed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be thinking of rational wiki. ED is by comparison relevant, informative, and funny.

    10. Re:I would be embarrassed... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      A point is an area of infinitely small size.

      If my truth was the size of a point I would just regard it as false.

  7. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just say most Americans arenâ(TM)t rich. Silicon Valley is the 1 %. All rich people live in a bubble.

    1. Re:Summary by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      Everyone lives in a bubble that distorts reality through the filter of their own experiences. The 1% just have very high distortion bubbles because 1: By definition most of their experiences aren't shared by 99% of the rest of the people (and vice versa,) 2: they're often surrounded by sycophants who will agree with whatever drivel they spout forth, and 3: their wealth and fame gives them a louder voice if they choose to exercise it publicly, which amplifies their view of their own importance even more.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in terms of world population income brackets, you are in that 1%

    3. Re:Summary by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      Sorry, i'm not as wealthy as you think i am. In terms of world population i'm in the 42%.

      Source: "The Unprecedented Expansion Of The Global Middle Class"

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:Summary by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I'm in the top 1% of the world, sure. Most of the US population isn't. The population of the US is roughly 5% of the population of the world, and there are quite a few more people in rich developed countries. If everyone in the US was better off than everyone not in the US, only about 20% of the people in the US would be world 1%ers.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every percent is a 1% in comparison to all other 99.

  8. Worthless ramblings... by InvalidsYnc · · Score: 2

    Tell us something we didn't know. Didn't even give us anything interesting that they had "heard". Bah. Waste of a couple of seconds to skim that fluff piece.

  9. What is this, your blog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Listen, not that I disagree with you on silicon valley being out of touch, but WTF is this doing on slashdot?

    1. Re:What is this, your blog? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      The author submitted it and then it seems everyone wants to comment that it shouldn't be here thus making it here.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:What is this, your blog? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      1. The author submits it.
      2. It gets uprated in Firehose by people that, as we know, don't read the article. Interesting subject line, no content, no Zuck calling everyone stupid fucks again, nothing.
      3. Editor looks it over for a moment once past posting threshold.
      4. PROFIT. Author gets some ad revenue... .

      Anyway, now we know who actually reads the articles... Valuable information.

      I made it a couple of paragraphs (past where the summary was a dupe section).

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
  10. Seriously? A random blog qualifies as "news" now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    /., go home. You're drunk.

  11. No examples? by i_ate_god · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole.

    ok, so I have no idea what you're referring to then

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:No examples? by Zocalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nor, I suspect, do many people who don't mingle with Silicon Valley types on a regular basis, which essentially turns the whole article into a meta example of what it claims. The author makes a claim that people in Silicon Valley (amongst other groups) are losing touch with reality because they are making vacuous statements, and then renders the article itself vacuous by failing to provide any supporting evidence or examples to back up his assertion. Or maybe it's just meant to be ironic?

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:No examples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know who he's referring to but I think he's way off base. The people at those companies are woke as hell

    3. Re:No examples? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      This is why the world needs more assholes.

      We've become this faux-nice society and have thrown away the entire concept of counter-culture as a necessary ingredient to a healthy society.

      Be the hero this country needs; be an asshole today!

      ( I'm not sure if I'm joking or not )

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    4. Re:No examples? by McGruber · · Score: 1

      > I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole.

      He submitted his own article to slashdot. Ergo, he is an asshole.

    5. Re:No examples? by barrygrommit · · Score: 1

      Agreed...exactly WHAT is the author referring to? I read the "TFA" and could find nothing concrete. Agh!

  12. So Silicon Valley is just like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The halls of the US Capitol in Washington DC?

    The Casino Floor in Las Vegas, Nevada?

    The Trailer Park in Gadsden, Alabama?

    The Fifth Floor of the Flatiron building in New York, New York?

    The break room on the USS Carl Vinson?

    Please tell us more.

  13. A Projection Of His Own Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Siegler's bit here reads like the writings of a person struggling with their own mental health. Nebulous negativity and ominous vacuousness.

    1. Re:A Projection Of His Own Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was waiting for some actual substance to his claims, but nothing comes. It is an opinion piece with absolutely zero examples or evidence. It doesn't even define what his complaint really is: HOW are tech workers out of touch, and what are they thinking that he disagrees with?

      He uses the Facebook example, but Facebook is used by the entire planet, not tech workers in the valley. His one example is inverted.

  14. saying what things by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "really smart people—saying some of the most vacuous things."

    What things. Just one example.?

    This article is a joke with no punchline.

    1. Re:saying what things by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      "really smart people—saying some of the most vacuous things."

      What things. Just one example.?

      This article is a joke with no punchline.

      I think the article itself might have been the example? Maybe it's too meta for us non valley folks.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    2. Re:saying what things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article could have been an example.... if it were written by a really smart person.

      See also https://ttoes.files.wordpress....

  15. I see vacuous words by iggymanz · · Score: 1, Troll

    This "article" or "summary" blathers on about nothing in particular with no examples or substantial points to make.

    Is slashdot twitter now, with a bunch of outraged SJW mouthing off about things of which they have no ability to form an coherent opinion or logical train of thoughts?

    1. Re:I see vacuous words by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley is on the SJW side.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:I see vacuous words by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Is slashdot twitter now, with a bunch of outraged SJW mouthing off about things of which they have no ability to form an coherent opinion or logical train of thoughts?

      Hold on. Silicon Valley is supposed to be full of SJWs, so surely this guy is an anti-SJW complaining about the SV SJWs..?

      Or maybe the phrase is meaningless bollocks and this article is just another example of how most people seem to think they are the only ones with any common sense and everyone who disagrees with them is an idiot.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I see vacuous words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moron.

    4. Re:I see vacuous words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he can't see the SJWs because he is one. The knee jerk comment that it's Trump's fault is a clue that he is still in that bubble.

  16. The rich and powerful are out of touch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Film at 11.

  17. Worthless Article by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2
    FTFS:

    People -- really smart people -- saying some of the most vacuous things

    The entire article is written at this level of generality. As such, you can search/replace Silicon Valley with Wall Street and the same article applies. Hell, you can probably replace it with "That McDonald's, no the one by the Burger King".

    His point may be valid, but he hasn't offered a single example to back it up.

    And, as a public service, he has links out of his article that imply he links to the "vacuous things", but it's just another shitty page with nothing on it and he's just trying to drive up page views.... like those articles across 12 pages.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  18. Entrenched echo chambers, indeed, are bad. by modi123 · · Score: 1

    Color me shocked that an established echo chamber leads to unchecked bad behavior - as seen from the outside. Obviously the solution is to create new silicon valleys - like the 'silicon prairie' in the mid west, silicon hollar, or silicon river.

    On that note I am pretty certain the Simpsons addressed this at Gazebo 7.

  19. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this modded down? This is an anti-Trump post.

  20. For those needing examples... by rs1n · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the article itself was example.

    1. Re:For those needing examples... by freax · · Score: 1

      Recursion..

  21. 2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At this point I'd vote for anyone that isn't Donald Trump. Including Eric Trump.

    1. Re:2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Haley/Pence 2020. They're already setting it up.

    2. Re:2020 Circus by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Haley, being one of the very few competent members of this administration, now looks on her way to get thrown under the bus. But by 2020, this may actually be a point in her favour with the voters.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:2020 Circus by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anyone blaming Trump still is stuck in the Silicon Valley bubble. Nothing that they said would happen has happened. Stocks did not drop, unemployment did not increase, economy did not tank, no one's civil rights have been taken away.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    4. Re: 2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Believe me, if you donâ(TM)t like Trump, youâ(TM)ll really hate Pence. So you just have to ride it out.

    5. Re:2020 Circus by Gr8Apes · · Score: 0

      Anyone blaming Trump still is stuck in the Silicon Valley bubble. Nothing that they said would happen has happened. Stocks did not drop, unemployment did not increase, economy did not tank, no one's civil rights have been taken away.

      It takes time to turn the Titanic. Stocks have gone up because the dollar has gone down. It's a more complicated equation that just a single number comparison with last year. Unemployment takes time, the economy is still chugging along. It took years to undo the financial mess Bush Jr and the Republicans worked decades to get us into, and it will take some time to feel the real effects of Trump and this Republican Congress' actions as they borrowed from tomorrow to essentially pay off their base into accepting an unsustainable budget that gains them billions.

      For the next couple of years, barring unforeseen fortunate events: unemployment will increase and the economy will grow as measured in total $s but in reality diminished due to inflation. As for civil rights, don't dare speak out against your government effectively, apparently you're a traitor if you do.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    6. Re:2020 Circus by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Silicon Valley was out of touch way before Trump was elected. They've been out of touch since pretty much the beginning.

    7. Re:2020 Circus by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      What do you mean on her way? They just said she was "confused" about something because of senior WH whoopsies ...

    8. Re:2020 Circus by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "no one's civil rights have been taken away."

      Not that i know anything about america, but didnt he take away the rights of the so called DACA or dreamers? forcing all these kids whoes parents brought them here to go back to a country where they may not even have citizenship?

      Unless you consider american children not deserving of civil rights, just because of their birth country, which is a pretty monstrous position to take.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    9. Re:2020 Circus by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Trump didn't take away dreamers rights. They were already illegal aliens, whether they came here illegally at 10 or 50. Laws are just being enforced like they always have been. Even liberal media ABC admitted Obama deported more than any other president and Trump is continuing what Obama started http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    10. Re:2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would children no matter how young not have citizenship in the country in which they were born? We're not talking about 'Anchor babies', e.g. babies had in the US by illegal immigrants, it is undisputed (though many people would like it to change) that the latter are citizens and no one is trying to send them anywhere.

      We're talking about people as old as up to 17 I think it is that were brought to the US illegally. So we're not even talking all 'children' per se but many 'young adults'. Either way, sending them back doesn't violate their civil rights any more than sending back a 40 year old illegal immigrant violates their civil rights.

      In any case, you're wrong, so as the parent post noted, none of the supposed 'nasty shit' that everyone on the left claimed would happen has in fact happened.

    11. Re:2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminder that even anchor babies have Mexican citizenship, so every time someone whines about breaking up families, just remind them that there's nothing stopping the kids from following the parents back to Mexico. I'd even approve of giving them taxpayer-funded bus tickets.

    12. Re: 2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The people sobbing about 'breaking up families' should be advocating for the whole, intact, family going back to their country of origin.

    13. Re:2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it is worth a day later, Obama's high deportation rate is a result of the decision to not count, as their own separate category, (1) folks *caught* illegally crossing at/near the border and (2) foreign nationals turned away at the border. Both were lumped in with the statistic for deportation, which obviously inflates the number incredibly high.

      The take away point I'd like make has nothing to do with "liberal media ABC" or any other liberal/conservative media outlet "admitting" anything (parenthesis to note the weasel words)-- it has to do with most media lacking even a mid-tier level of depth in terms of its reporting/research, and media either ignoring or not informing themselves on how administrative or minor statistical mechanisms will often explain a great deal of a situation.

      I'll leave the "Trump didn't take away dreamers right. They were already illegal aliens..." statement alone.

    14. Re:2020 Circus by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      no one's civil rights have been taken away.

      Well except if you're Hispanic or an undocumented immigrant. But I suppose a lot of misguided people like to pretend that only citizens have rights.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    15. Re:2020 Circus by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Everything we said has happened,including convictions of inner services and yes, rights HAVE been taken away, just ask Chris Kobach, tRump's choice for "Voter integrity" now standing convicted of contempt of court for REFUSING the right to vote to citizens.

    16. Re: 2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the extent that we are talking about rights that are not tied to citizenship, Donald Trump didn't take away anybody's rights. Nobody has a right to live just anywhere. (And I say that as someone who is not a Trump supporter, and who believes that the dreamers should be allowed to stay.)

    17. Re: 2020 Circus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Haha, I'm in favor of sending all them brown people away, even if their actually US citizens. Hell, I think the American public should pay for it!"

      Do you still wonder why people call you assholes "racist"?

  22. The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    The best way to sum up the SF Bay Area is this: "The Deep South of the West Coast". They are every bit as willfully ignorant, deluded and brainwashed as the bible-banging racist MAGA-hat wearers. The SF Bay is an echo chamber of ProgLib Politics just as the Deep South is an Echo Chamber of the GOPs and Evangelical messages of "God and Country" and both of these communities have NO TOLERANCE for any form of deviance from their mono-culture

    Frankly I think the US is in store for a mass civil upheaval, and considering one side is very well armed and "has god on their side", and the other are physically weak, deluded and over-confident assholes, take one guess about which side will win

    By 2035 the US will be a 3rd World Theocracy on par with Iran or Afghanistan, with racial purges and religious persection
    Look to the BRICS, the future of the Global Economy now lays with them

    1. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Frankly I think the US is in store for a mass civil upheaval, and considering one side is very well armed and "has god on their side", and the other are physically weak, deluded and over-confident assholes, take one guess about which side will win

      Hmm....think those are the same types of people that are wanting to take guns away?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think the GOP, NRA and the hundreds of right wing militias are ever going to let that happen? In fact -- that could be what starts armed conflict in the US. Lord knows the NRA have all but called for the slaughter of the Left, though they have dog whistled about it enough and Trump, FOX and Sinclair never tire of calling the Left "The Enemies of America"

      Mock the situation all you want -- but the right wing propaganda machine has been calling out the Left as the enemy for years now and priming the population for escalation of conflict from political/ideological to all out war and persecution

    3. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True ... the USA free white yeomanry gonna rip skank Soros-financed nibberizing Trotsky progressives a new azzwhole ... just like Poles did to invading Russians and German Brownshirts did to kommi jUUZ ... both in 1920. Long overdue, that bleeding-out of tyrannous progressive swine and their simpering academic and media hoes ... and a long-time gone.

    4. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And you think the GOP, NRA and the hundreds of right wing militias are ever going to let that happen? In fact -- that could be what starts armed conflict in the US. Lord knows the NRA have all but called for the slaughter of the Left,

      Wow...just....wow.

      You really believe that?

      Did it never occur to you that the NRA is made up of and supported BY citizens of the United States, and that the organization is there to lobby on their behalf?

      This isn't some mindless entity that is trying to push its evil views on the country, it is a representative of the people that value their 2A rights.

      If the left wasn't trying to gun grab again....you'd not see this level of animosity that does seem to be brewing somewhat, but then again, what can you expect when you have sections of the US, trying to infringe upon the LONG held rights of many others in the US. You expect them to give up easily?

      I'm actually shocked, to see how many people today, and it is mostly youths, that are so willing it seems to voluntarily give up their own rights.

      And once you do give up said rights, you pretty much never can give them back.

      But using words like slaughter, etc....that's really going above board. No one is calling for that.

      If anything, I see more vitriol of that type actually coming from the left these days....they are the ones having the more violent protests these days.

      If, however, there ever came a time with there was an attempt at mass confiscation, then yes....you likely would see violence.

      I don't forsee it coming to that, but if constitutional rights get stomped on too much, it could get messy.

      But do realize...that's what this country was founded upon, you know? Rights were hard fought for....the British didn't really nicely want to give us up if you recall. The founding fathers felt strongly enough to fight for their independence and to have a country with inherit rights.

      One of the reasons for the 2nd Amendment, was to have some insurance that the government didn't become too overbearing and intrusive again. It wasn't passed to just assure people they could still hunt food.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > One of the reasons for the 2nd Amendment, was to have some insurance that the government didn't become too overbearing and intrusive again ... and take away their slaves. But I digress.

      The idea that the "gun lovers" would do better than the "libtards" if society went full Beirut civil war is ignorant video gaming level speculation. Water, food, electricity, gasoline, ammunition, medicine. It's a very interconnected web right now keeping this very comfortable society going. Sure gun-nut-Dan with his garage full of rounds and AR-15s can go shoot the lesbians down the road and take their kale, but that kale will run out and the gay guys across the street might get the jump on him after he gets dysentery or runs out of gas while patrolling his neighborhood looking out for the gang bangers who are also hungry, have figured out where the fat white guy keeps his arsenal, and are used to operating while hungry, without unlimited police support or unlimited automobile transportation and with people shooting back. Good luck NRA cosplayers. We'd all be in for generations of misery and painful death.

      I'm not anti or pro "gun". I think there are far more important issues to be addressed right now, some urgent, some common sense. But Netflix-America just lurches from one outrage to another and rants at the opposing team on Facebook these days.

    6. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      You clearly have no idea how the rest of the world perceives American gun-fetishists and its associated stupidity.

      There is NO God-given right to play with guns. Deal.

    7. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an illiterate embarrassment to mankind.

    8. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You have a right to defend yourself. You don't have a right to drop your neighbour at 50 yards.

      Someone who's actually spent time outside the US please mod parent up.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Frankly I think the US is in store for a mass civil upheaval, and considering one side is very well armed and "has god on their side", and the other are physically weak, deluded and over-confident assholes, take one guess about which side will win

      Um, the side that stays more legal? In civilized countries, we delegate a lot of our potential for violence to people who work for the government. Modern criminal justice systems have a lot of problems, but far fewer than if we practiced private vengeance.

      If a "good ol' boy" fires a rifle at me, that "good ol' boy" is likely to be arrested, convicted, and lose the right to own a gun.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      If the left wasn't trying to gun grab again

      The "Left" isn't particularly unified on this. Some leftists would like gun ownership mostly abolished, sure. Lots would like to see weapons like the AR-15 banned, but aren't willing to campaign to ban handguns and hunting rifles. A ban on AR-15 class weapons would be rather similar to the Reagan-era legislation on owning automatic weapons, and IIRC the NRA was in favor of that (can't find references right now, sorry).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      You clearly have no idea how the rest of the world perceives American gun-fetishists and its associated stupidity.

      And you clearly have no idea how little we give a shit how the rest of the world perceives the US gun laws and leanings.

      If you're not in the US, why are you even bothered at all how we live and do in our own country'? It has nothing to do with you or effect on your lives.

      There is NO God-given right to play with guns. Deal.

      Actually, in the US we believe you do...in fact, ALL rights are God given, you are born with them, and then we take and regulate and have laws on some that may curtail some of them. In the US, neither the Constitution nor the government (federal, state or local) gives rights to the citizens, it is the citizenry that gives limited, enumerated rights to the various governments, and here, the states are supposed to have the most say on those laws....at least that's how it is set up to be.

      So basically, unless there is a specific law against it, you are born with a right to just about anything or any behavior in the world in the US.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re: The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it never occur to you that the NRA is made up of and supported BY citizens of the United States, and that the organization is there to lobby on their behalf?

      Did it never occur to you that the NRA is full of bullshit, that they would willingly embrace jackbooted oppression in the name of their own sacred tenets?

      This isn't some mindless entity that is trying to push its evil views on the country, it is a representative of the people that value their 2A rights.

      They aren't mindless, that is true, though the patsies they exploit with their hypocritical crowing for the freedom to oppress others aren't exactly thinking. They're just being lead by emotional appeals to fear, anger, and resentment.

      If the left wasn't trying to gun grab again....you'd not see this level of animosity that does seem to be brewing somewhat, but then again, what can you expect when you have sections of the US, trying to infringe upon the LONG held rights of many others in the US. You expect them to give up easily?

      No, not only did you spend decades trying to keep slavery protected by law, you spent more decades with discrimination enforced by law. Now you're fabricating a fear over a phantom "gun-grabbing" even while you have a president, a legislature, and a judiciary under your thumb.

      But you don't have the support of the people, and they actually have legitimate grievances that they are petitioning the government to address. Yet you ignore their cries.

      Why?

      I'm actually shocked, to see how many people today, and it is mostly youths, that are so willing it seems to voluntarily give up their own rights.

      Youth has often been more aware of the truth than the aged in their senile ranting. Remember who pointed out the Emperor had no clothes.

      And once you do give up said rights, you pretty much never can give them back.

      Actually, the tools of oppression have been continually eroded. That's what scares those in power.

      But using words like slaughter, etc....that's really going above board. No one is calling for that.

      Oh sure, putting all the gays in a FEMA camp so they die off is so muh better. But wait, I can go find Ted Nugent and other luminaries calling for just that, including your current president.

      If anything, I see more vitriol of that type actually coming from the left these days....they are the ones having the more violent protests these days.

      That's what Bull Connor said in the Sixties. It was a fabrication then as it is now. But you are desperate to pretend it is the truth.

      If, however, there ever came a time with there was an attempt at mass confiscation, then yes....you likely would see violence.

      We've already seen violence.

      McVeigh, Malfeur, Bundy, Vegas, South Carolina...

      I don't forsee it coming to that, but if constitutional rights get stomped on too much, it could get messy.

      Then why don't you stop?

      But do realize...that's what this country was founded upon, you know? Rights were hard fought for....the British didn't really nicely want to give us up if you recall. The founding fathers felt strongly enough to fight for their independence and to have a country with inherit rights.

      Actually, the Founding Fathers wanted wealth and power, and didn't care who they hurt to get it. That is why their legacy included slavery anf slaughter of the Indians. Not to mention their successors like William Henry Harrison who attacked an innocent village then lied about it, or Jackson who forced the Cherokee to Oklahoma.

      One of the reasons for the 2nd Amendment, was to have some insurance that the government didn't become too overbearing and intrusive again. It wasn't passed to just assure people th

    13. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the side that stays more legal?

      So, the well armed side then.

      See, being well armed isn't illegal (2nd amendment). Neither is believing in a god (1st amendment)

      Those traits also don't translate to them being more prone to committing illegal acts.

      I can't say the same for being deluded and over confident. Deluded could mean you've convinced yourself that you're above the law or that your personal pet cause trumps the rule of law. Over confidence may mean you think you've got the perfect plan to get away with doing something illegal, that you can out smart the system.

      What will likely happen during mass civil upheaval is that the unarmed but deluded and over confident side would destroy itself from infighting, as it would have more deluded people who seek power during the chaos, over confident that they'll succeed. The gun tottin' god fearin' side "wins" not so much of any action on their part, but simply for being the survivors (having guns help them survive, if anything they could hunt for food!).

    14. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      A ban on AR-15 class weapons would be rather similar to the Reagan-era legislation on owning automatic weapons

      PLEASE learn a bit more before you argue a subject.

      it is already VERY difficult to legally own an automatic weapon in the US.

      With current laws on the books, you cannot as a civilian possess a machine gun (fully automatic weapon, meaning one pull of the trigger will continue to fire until the trigger is released) that was made after 1986.

      If you have about $10K which I believe is about the going rate for the cheapest of available low end machine guns in the us...you can find someone that will sell it, but you first must fill out paperwork, get a $200 tax stamp from the BATF, and then you can get that automatic weapon.

      The AR platform, a civilian weapon is NOT an automatic weapon/machine gun. They are all just semi-automatic rifles. There are many many semi-automatic rifles out there, that shoot the same ammo (by the way, the AR-15 generally shoots a glorified .22 caliber projectile)....and many even more powerful ammo, but they aren't black, and don't look as 'scary'....but functionally, they are the same or even more powerful.

      The AR just is popular due to interchangeable and upgradeable parts....none of which are legal to be sold to convert or use as a fully automatic weapon.

      The AR is not an assault weapon, as that I mentioned, it is only semi-automatic, one pull of the trigger fires one shot. Again, MANY if not most other rifles fit that same description. Many ARs have things like pistol grips, or extendable stocks, but that stuff is purely aesthetic...they don't make them more deadly than any other semi-automatic rifle.

      By the way....30 rounds is a standard magazine size, it isn't high capacity. Many rifles have that as standard magazine size....but that's another argument.

      Anyway, please do note on your future arguments, that the AR platform rifles that the citizens in the US have are not fully automatic weapons. None of the shootings you've been hearing of in any recent times have been done with automatic rifles...they were all semi-automatic.

      Hope that helps.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      But using words like slaughter, etc....that's really going above board. No one is calling for that.

      To be fair, the GP did use the term "dogwhistle", which is almost always a term the left uses to excuse their exercise of imparting words and motives onto those they would like to discredit. It is their dogwhistling way of saying, "He didn't say that, but we all know what words we're going to put in his mouth."

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    16. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You clearly have no idea how little we care about how you perceive America. Here is a clue, I don't live my life to impress you, Benji. I would tell you to go fuck yourself and the rest of your country sideways, but I actually don't care.

      Now, that being said, who decided that I don't have a God-given right to play with guns? You? Do I have a God-given right to play with stick? Must I have your permission to play with a rock? May I, sir? Please?

      Once again, go fuck yourself, you overbearing prick.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    17. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it never occur to you that the NRA is made up of and supported BY citizens of the United States, and that the organization is there to lobby on their behalf?

      This isn't some mindless entity that is trying to push its evil views on the country, it is a representative of the people that value their 2A rights.

      It's both bro. The two are not mutually exclusive.

      Sure, the NRA can be an organization funded mostly by citizens.

      But those citizens are also mindless idiots. Most Americans are.

      We have evidence too, from you:

      I'm actually shocked, to see how many people today, and it is mostly youths, that are so willing it seems to voluntarily give up their own rights.

      You seem to think so many people on the other side are basically idiots. Well, your side fell from the same tree (and if the other side is young people, that implies you were the ones who raised them! Good job!). Y'all are Americans, no matter how much you insist the other side is "what's wrong with America" or "not what America is about" or whatever. No no no no no. They are your people. They still have the vote. It's not like you can just go and take their vote away (that would go against all the things you said about rights and such)

    18. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      So basically, unless there is a specific law against it, you are born with a right to just about anything or any behavior in the world in the US.

      Stop spreading misinformation.
      In the USA, everyone is guilty of a bunch of serious crimes they've never heard of. When the right people decide they need to get you out of the way or collect they snatch you up and record any new crimes you commit up until you plea down or submit to a fair trial where you may be found not guilty or guilty and given no less amount of punishment than required to destroy the rest of your life.

    19. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're too dumb to notice that the republicans don't actually give a shit about any of the causes they espouse and it's almost always cover for enabling some other objective. Like keeping black people on the right side of town or getting out of wall street's way next time they feel like gorging themselves on our retirement funds. If you were a democrat you'd be the one telling people that Hillary is the voice of young black people.

      A true.. dumb...believer.

    20. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think the GOP, NRA and the hundreds of right wing militias are ever going to let that happen? In fact -- that could be what starts armed conflict in the US. Lord knows the NRA have all but called for the slaughter of the Left,

      If anything, I see more vitriol of that type actually coming from the left these days....they are the ones having the more violent protests these days

      Yep, the only calls for slaughter I see are coming from the intolerant Left as they advocate for violence against all who think differently than them.

    21. Re: The Deep South of the West Coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you clearly have no idea how little we give a shit how the rest of the world perceives the US gun laws and leanings.

      You certainly crow enough about the greatness of America, you practically blare it from the trumpets on a daily basis.

      If you're not in the US, why are you even bothered at all how we live and do in our own country'? It has nothing to do with you or effect on your lives.

      Tell that to all the victims of American diplomacy at the point of the bayonet.

      The day you go home and stay there is the day you get to make that claim.

    22. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      The likes of the UK are currently banning knives and acid, I'm sure possessing a rock or stick without government permission will be illegal sooner or later.

      Even then, it's unlikely to change such insufferable arrogance.

    23. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      This isn't some mindless entity that is trying to push its evil views on the country, it is a representative of the people that value their 2A rights.

      The NRA opposes ANY gun controls, even those supported by the majority of Americans.

    24. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The NRA opposes ANY gun controls, even those supported by the majority of Americans.

      ACtually, unfortunately, they do not.

      The NRA actually came out in favor of bump stock bans, which it should not have done.

      And mean of the gun controls we have today (which we shouldn't have) were supported by the NRA....the 1986 bills for instance were huge.

      But even so, they do a good job and do recognize, that the NRA isn't some faceless entity with a mind of its own, it is a lobbying agency supported by millions of legal citizen gun owners that wish to have their voices heard.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:The Deep South of the West Coast by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What should I have learned? I knew pretty much everything you said. I couldn't remember what that 1986 law was called, but you didn't say either.

      What I meant is that we have laws that make it very difficult to own automatic weapons, and ban all less than about thirty years old, and extending that to the closest non-automatic equivalents wasn't much of a stretch If I was unclear, I apologize.

      Given the wording of the Second, it seems odd to me that I can't buy a modern infantry rifle, and I don't see that the Second should allow AR-15s and not M16A4s.

      I wasn't aware that 30 rounds was a standard magazine size for a semi-auto rifle. It seems awfully high. We fought WWII with semi-automatic rifles with eight-round clips. Thirty rounds seems unnecessary for most purposes, and I'd think reducing the magazine size would reduce the weight and make the weapon more manageable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  23. People without "real" problems create new ones by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For themselves and everyone around them. From celebrities to soccer moms to, yes, why not SV inhabitants. I have no idea where this urge comes from, but listen to anyone, literally anyone, who doesn't have any real problems to deal with, i.e. those that have the first and pretty much the second level of the pyramid of needs fulfilled and overfulfilled. You'll notice them lament about problems that are none. They actually start inventing problems they can lament about if they really can't find any.

    Meanwhile, out here in reality, we shake our heads about them and wonder whether these are really role models and something to aspire to.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      I'd add that even people with real problems also say vacuous things, out of touch with reality. Go stand in line at Wendy's and listen to the people around you, and the conversations between the cooks in the back. You will hear lots of vacuous and inane things.

      I don't know why someone would think SV would be in touch with reality. Intelligence doesn't solve cognitive biases.

      Nobody's in touch with reality. And being surprised that someone else isn't in touch with reality is a pretty good sign you're far out of touch with reality yourself.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, out here in reality, we shake our heads about them and wonder whether these are really role models and something to aspire to.

      There are those who look at them as role models because they're delusional enough to believe they're examples of how to have needs fulfilled and overfulfilled. There are others who look at them as role models because they're delusional enough to believe they're examples of how to be fulfilled or overfulfillled human beings above fault. I think you're part of group B. Me? I don't look at SV as role models, except so far in we could potential learn how to fulfill the needs of many people. So far, they're not good examples of that but better examples of overfulfilling the needs of few people. Hence, we don't want more SVs.

    3. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be great if people stopped inventing boogie-men and fake problems? No more ranting about SJWs, no more panic over which bathroom someone uses, no more gynophobia and being alone and angry...

      But they won't, because inventing problems gives them someone to blame for the problems in their lives. Don't get me wrong, the deck is stacked, but inventing new problems isn't going to fix anything.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize, you just invented a new fake problem, right?

      Are you being obtuse, or is it deliberate?

    5. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      I don't know why someone would think SV would be in touch with reality. Intelligence doesn't solve cognitive biases.

      A google map view of churches in the SV area would seem to support this. No matter where on earth, people are willing to allow others to define reality for them.

      It is this phenomenon of group think, cognitive biases, and active suppression of sources of cognitive dissonance that makes me appreciate freedom of speech so much. It is through it that established truths, and people's reality bubbles can be questioned.

      Having a settled world view is surely the easiest way to fall into a mental snare and not even realize it.

    6. Re:People without "real" problems create new ones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said "Wouldn't it be great if people stopped inventing boogie-men and fake problems", then pretty much gave your own fake problems.
      Ranting about SJWs, bathroom controversy, and "fear of vaginas" are such non issues as to be irrelevant.

  24. Let's be honest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the show has been this way since the first season

  25. What's this nonsense? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

    No examples, no specifics, just some vacuous rambling.

    Damn, I miss the good old days when Slashdot posted stuff of interest.

    1. Re:What's this nonsense? by atrex · · Score: 1

      I was thinking much the same thing.

      1) How does this belong on slashdot?
      2) Based on the site descriptions on google (I refuse to generate actual traffic to the linked site), it sounds like it's just some guy's rambling blog - not a reputable information source.
      3) If the source site is just someone's blog, this being posted to /. seems like a lame attempt to generate traffic for the site that shouldn't have gotten past moderation.
      4) People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones - iows someone completely suffocating inside their own bubble bitching about other peoples' bubbles is hardly news worthy.

    2. Re:What's this nonsense? by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      This article was pure red meat for a lively /. discussion. Are you not entertained?

  26. Not a single example?! by jelwell · · Score: 3, Informative

    This has got to be one of the worst articles I have read in a long time. There isn't a single example of what he's talking about.

    "I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole. But also because I don’t have to. I’d wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I’m talking about in their own circles—even if only in their own virtual circles. This is everywhere."

    Actually, I have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe you could write an article to explain yourself.
    Joseph Elwell.

    1. Re:Not a single example?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are wrong, there is a single example: the article itself. He meta'd the fuck out of it, didnt he

  27. Brilliant Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did RTFA and the brilliance of the author is mind blowing. In less than one page he provides a clear 1st hand example of the issue he is raising. Whether he knew it or not is another question altogether :-)

  28. It's a nice bubble though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see our Silicon Valley bubble economy expand to include more of the US. Then maybe people would understand the draw of having an exciting career instead of simply working to pay the bills. The disadvantage to the easy investment money is there are a lot of loons running billion dollar companies, but most of us have learned to ignore the crazy flamboyant CEOs and focus on our work.

    1. Re:It's a nice bubble though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it amusing that you typed and posted that without the slightest trace of irony.

    2. Re:It's a nice bubble though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry that you hate your job and don't want to make more money.

  29. Invented in Silicon Valley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the author thinks that people believing absurd things, refusing to admit it, and instead joining other people with the same absurd ideas, is something exclusive to Silicon Valley? Maybe he should go out of his bubble and then realize that the entire world is made of bubbly foam.

  30. Ahem.... by beheaderaswp · · Score: 2

    There is far to little "naming of names" these days.

    Without it... one cannot gauge the veracity of a conclusion.

    Name names- or shutup!

    --
    Another consultant who stuck it out.

    "We are the Priests, of the Temples of Syrinx..."
  31. Oh lord, bubbles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's an industry filled with some of the most brilliant people in the world,

    Hell, I've met more plumbers of high intelligence than I've met developers. To quote a wise Frenchman - doesn't take a lot of savvy just to be a whore. Tech workers are, by and large, dumbasses outside of a very narrow scope. Most people are, in fact; tech whores just love giving themselves airs, though.

    I'd wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I'm talking about in their own circles -- even if only in their own virtual circles.

    Sure. It's usually TDS-related. Every dumb fuck is an expert on the stock market, Syria, North Korea, every level of our legal system, et cetera, et cetera.

    Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump

    And there it is.

  32. Post is vague; SV needs humanity by Kohath · · Score: 2

    Yeah, ideologues are at odds with reality. And ambition is looking past current reality toward a less real (but better) future. So when ambitious ideologues get ahead of themselves, they seem out of touch with reality — because they are.

    It's not reality that Silicon Valley needs, it's humanity. Don't "make the world a better place"; make things better for people instead. People need your help, they don't need you to be their overseer, they don't need your ideas for how they should think or how they should live their lives. Don't impose. Don't preach at people. Don't try to engineer or optimize people who didn't ask you. Don't be a bully.

  33. EXAMPLE: @jack saying oneparty rule is a good idea by gDLL · · Score: 2

    I see people here asking for examples of out of touchness:

    https://ijr.com/2018/04/108406...

  34. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  35. "Normal" people lead the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think nerds are alone when they make vacuous statements that show they're out of touch with reality, you don't listen to enough "normal" people. The same freedom to say stupid stuff wasn't enjoyed by geeks. They used to be "put in their place" at the first sign of uppityness. Their focus on arcane stuff and intricate details kept them busy anyway. Now they join the masses with too much time on their hands and an unjustified sense of accomplishment. They're becoming normal, so they do what normal people do: say stupid stuff.

  36. Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a job and if the internet goes out, my job still goes on.

    1. Re:Nope. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      For most of the Slashdot readers, no internet is as bad as no electricity.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  37. He suggests it's partially Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thus making the kind of statement he's railing against.

  38. People are Herd Animals by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Particularly when in tight groups or quarters.

    Groupthink allows one to feel safe.

  39. No problems here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Reality is a crutch for people who can't handle science fiction.

    2) The difference between fantasy and reality is that reality has so little to recommend it.

    3) Go away, I'm off to play ‘Ready Player One: OASIS beta' on Steam.

  40. relative by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    human... possibly most existence is or has to be relative perspective.

    The 1st world problems can feel just as severe and important to them as the 3rd world problems do to their people. Isolated, they won't ever be aware of what can happen outside of hypothetical fictional musings. Being aware does not put it into conscious thought all the time without reminders and your conscious mind has limitations on how many aspects it can deal with at a time.

    For example, in the USA when it was 3rd world and quite barbaric (still left out of the history) they had a revolutionary war over less taxation and less representation than we have today; they also had less to lose by actually fighting and the majority were willing to harbor terrorists/traitors against the government while a minority of less 10% did the fighting until it was looking promising and even then probably only around 20% at peak. (please correct me if I'm not recollecting the numbers correctly; but remember the point is that a tiny group starts things and does the real hard work to build momentum where the majority of recruits who continue that momentum are often still not half the population. Passive and fickle is the majority... easily willing to praise successes and "join" them by word alone. )

  41. "Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, an example of MG Siegler losing touch with reality, saying some of the most vacuous, embarrassing things? Perhaps we can blame part of it on Slashdot, posting this nonsense?

  42. Is this The Onion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guy says tech people are in a bubble, blames Trump inside his blame Trump bubble.

  43. This article is the equivalent of a homeless guy s by SmaryJerry · · Score: 1

    No substance, no point, just saying people are out of touch about... uh about .. he doesnâ(TM)t say... and the problem is... wait there is no problem... and the cause of this he says is... maybe trump because... uhh ... well that was a very big waste of time. If you havenâ(TM)t read the article donâ(TM)t bother.

  44. Not New by Luthair · · Score: 1

    Lets think about other recent vapid silicon valley cycles: app economy, social, messaging, sharing economy.

    Exactly how many of these changed the world?

    App economy - people churning out bad games designed to prey on suckers

    Social - while a few sites survived every beneficial use of social graphs failed leaving only sleazy actors like Cambridge Analytica

    Messaging - still irrelevant, no western company managed to replicate the Asian market where messaging apps became platforms (probably because those apps started before smart phones)

    Sharing economy - not actually sharing, taxis with apps behaving badly and short term rentals crowding out the market and causing disturbances

    AI - not actually AI, so far deployed in a haphazard fashion with two companies (Tesla & Uber) causing deaths, and one of these companies continually points the finger at the victims.

  45. Zombie outbreak in Silicon Valley! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Proof positive.

  46. For instance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...SJWs sitting around SV cafes and coffee houses virtue signaling about segments of a first world society being "privileged". The truth is that the first world society as a whole is privileged. It doesn't generally lack for clean running water, toilet facilities, sanitation, rudimentary housing, adequate food, etc. Overeducated, elitist assholes lack a sense of proportion about these things. They've an foetid, bloated sense of self importance where their common sense should reside.

  47. Seriously? Was there a point to be made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The source article reads more like a conclusion in search of an article than an article. "Smart people not in touch with reality" - In this case tech workers, but can also be said of academics, politicians, journalists, writers, musicians, barristas, or the village idiot; especially when there is no context. Without illustrations of HOW they have lost touch, there is no pretty much in having written word one.

    And, no, I don't think this is something anyone should try and pin to a generation. Millennials may make for a popular target, but most of the upper echelons are now in their 40s, and likely promoting the stupidity that inspired the author int he first place.

  48. With posts like this. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    The submitter will continue to be only a commentator. The post meanders along with no substance, then eventually gets to the point that it is just a political hit piece.

  49. Before you get defensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the post makes a good point, but it isn't specific to the tech industry. Our brains are complicated systems for forming quick heuristics to guide our behavior, with a more recent sophisticated layer on top that rationalizes our opinions to ourselves and to each other. This rationalization is as close to "reasoning" as any of us – any of us – can generally get, without feedback from others. Many studies have shown that we form opinions first, subconsciously, and then derive rationalizations of them. Even in science (I am a PhD student studying machine learning) we depend on our intuition and hunches – our unconscious bias – to guide us toward problems and solutions. Most of the training one gets as a scientist is informing those biases toward productive directions. There's nothing inherently bad about it. It's just how human brains work. We should just acknowledge that we need to listen to dissenting opinions in order to become aware of our own biases. A concrete example from research: when your paper is rejected by reviewers who object to your methodology or the set of experiments you chose to run, they are providing you with the feedback you need to escape your own bias (toward the experiments YOU find convincing) and communicate something to someone else with their own bias (the experiments THEY find convincing). It's foolish to complain that "they just don't get it." It's your job to figure out how to communicate it to them.

    Getting back to the original post, this is a ubiquitous problem across all communities of people. We can call it an "echo chamber," but this is really just how brains work. We only know what we can perceive ourselves and what those around us force us to look at, through voicing dissenting opinions. A person like me who was raised on computers, hasn't left the USA much, hasn't even experienced life in most corners of the US or most neighborhoods of the cities where I have lived – such a person is going to miss things due to lack of exposure to them. The Wikipedia article about Ghana tells you nothing about what the experience of living in Ghana is like. You have to go there. If such a person has the power to create tools that affect the lives of people in all those places, they are inevitably going to make decisions that negatively impact some of those people some of the time. It's not because of any kind of moral flaw or lack of intelligence or wisdom. It's just because we are not omniscient. We don't have the information we need to make better decisions. (A clear example: voice recognition systems which can't handle certain accents well. An easy problem to fix, once you know it exists, and surely not intentional. There are just a lot of accents, and you need to collect more training data for your system.)

  50. BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not reading "It's Trump's fault" in there.

    He's saying all their silly valley "friends" including the VCs are egging them on to stay in that bubble. Because it's great to be in the bubble because that's where the happens happen. That's how silly valley attacks all the world's ills, you know.

    Anyway, it's not a particularly insightful piece of commentardery. The "wake up call" is particularly poorly done. But I don't see the political sauce you're projecting on it.

    1. Re:BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by mysticgoat · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Don't read too much into this.

      The article is an excellent example of what might now be called "Trumpist discourse", where vacuous phrases are tossed about to lead persons who are not using critical reading skills to accept some underlying, unspoken, premise. A couple of decades ago this style of suasion could have been called "Rushist discourse". Rush Limbaugh was a past master of this, even getting much of his audience to proudly label themselves "Dittoheads". Before that, the author of this vacuous attack on rational thought might have been labelled a Pied Piper, leading the good but child-like netizens astray by appealing to their Inner Children.

      The purpose of this author's work was not to persuade anyone to any particular cause or to take any particular action. Its sole purpose was to derail the reader's train of thought; to create in each reader a train wreck of their rational processes.

      Perhaps this was done with the intent to follow up with sock puppets in the comments that would direct the susceptible into adopting some particular point of view. Or perhaps it was done as an experiment to see whether the Slashdot community could be influenced in this way (with more specific attempts to brainwash slashdotters to follow). Or perhaps ---to put this in the most benign light possible--- this was an attempt to inoculate slashdotters from this kind of attack on their cognitive abilities.

      Netizens of Silicon Valley: Untie! Free yourselves from the yoke of hard thinking! Four legs good, Two legs BETTER!

    2. Re:BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by tomhath · · Score: 1

      Nice post. By the way, when did you stop beating your wife?

    3. Re:BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Why was this modded Offtopic?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Heck, my wife beats me up almost every morning. I'm more of a night owl than she is.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    5. Re:BREAKING: Not Trump's fault by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      It should be modded up. The more one is aware of propaganda techniques, the more obvious they become.

  51. Dunning–Kruger effect by borcharc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tech people are really good at falling victim to the Dunning–Kruger effects https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... They equate their highly specialized technical abilities or "smarts" with being at the upper end of the cognitive spectrum overall. Where in fact, they are unable to baseline a "smart" person, so they assume they are one, because of their success in a very limited area. This is reinforced by people telling them how smart they are. Where in reality they understand a somewhat simple topic that the person giving the compliment lacks an understanding of.

    The Dunning–Kruger effect is not just in tech, most people who are less than average overall assume they are at the upper end of the spectrum. This is entirely caused by a lack of a real point of comparison, they are ignorant of what they are ignorant of and no one dares tell them differently. They then feel they have authority to speak on topics where they have no more expertise than the average fifth grader. A great example of this is a genetics professor I once had given a lecture (in a high-level genetics class) about computer security. He was repeting a perspective that had recently been published in the media. He spoke with complete authority on the topic, but due to my lifetime in security, I know everything he was saying was sensationally fake. He lacked the perspective to understand that he wasn't smart in this area but claimed his high-level knowledge in biology allowed him to be an expert in every possible field. This is the exact same force at work...

    1. Re:Dunning–Kruger effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunning–Kruger is a side effect of a lack of abstract reasoning. Funny that tech people, who need abstract reasoning to do their job well, suffer so much from Dunning–Kruger, but it does explain how so many do their jobs so poorly.

  52. NEWS: 3rd rate Blogger sneaks in /. headliner ... by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    ... with meager quality hippster column on how silicon valley is bad, Peter Thiel and Co. are on koke, Ellison and Co. can be A-grade dicks and Mark talks big nothing in press release. Film at eleven.

    I want my 3 minutes back.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  53. Bubbles by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2
    In the Beginning was The Plan

    And then came the Assumptions

    And the Assumptions were without form

    And the Plan was completely without substance

    And the darkness was upon the face of the Workers

    And the Workers spoke amongst themselves, saying

    "It is a crock of shit, and it stinketh."

    And the Workers went unto their Supervisors and sayeth,

    "It is a pail of dung and none may abide the odor thereof."

    And the Supervisors went unto their Managers and sayeth unto them,

    "It is a container of excrement and it is very strong,

    such that none may abide by it."

    And the Managers went unto their Directors and sayeth,

    "It is a vessel of fertilizer, and none may abide its strength."

    And the Directors spoke among themselves, saying one to another,

    "It contains that which aids plant growth, and it is very strong."

    And the Directors went unto the Vice Presidents and sayeth unto them,

    "It promotes growth and is very powerful."

    And the Vice Presidents went unto the President and sayeth unto him,

    "This new Plan will actively promote the growth and efficiency of this

    Company, and in these Areas in particular."

    And the President looked upon The Plan,

    And saw that it was good, and The Plan became Policy.

    And this is how Shit Happens.

  54. Content free article by plopez · · Score: 2

    No content was harmed in the making of the article. 500 words on a complex social, economic, political, labor, gender roles, and political topic. Common now there is no way to do that except to rely on sweeping generalizations, stereotyping, unsupported assumption, and simplistic conclusions. Maybe this actual is intended to be an illustration of the arrogance and lack of intelligence I see in Silly Valley.

    And a slashdot post is too short for me to even begin my ranting and raving. Maybe a journal entry.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  55. Isn't everyone by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

    Due to limited resources for intake, analysis, correlation of information, EVERYONE lives in a bubble. If it was possible for one person to know and understand everything, we would elect that person king of the world.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    1. Re:Isn't everyone by Kohath · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't. You'd feel emotionally threatened by that person and treat them badly.

      (If not "you" then the collective "you" -- the plurality that would be required to elect someone.)

  56. Re:This article is the equivalent of a homeless gu by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    From the article:
    "Instead, I fear IQ has won at the expense of EQ"

    In his own words, rational thinking has won out over emotions. If that's out of touch then I fear his idea of in touch.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  57. almost had it figured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People -- really smart people -- saying some of the most vacuous things.

    It's an industry filled with some of the most brilliant people in the world, which makes it all the more disappointing.

    an industry which purports itself to be full of the most brilliant people in the world

    Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump, even if only indirectly (a man who has gotten ahead in life by saying asinine things). If I had to guess, I'd say the root is an increasing sense of entitlement as the tech industry has grown in stature to become the most important from a fiscal perspective and arguably from a cultural perspective as well.

    ohhhh. So close. You almost had it! The are all entitled fools! Not brilliant at all! This is the cognitive dissonance you feel, the realization that only assholes who think too much of themselves think they are "standing on giant shoulders".

    captcha: bigness

  58. VR Person in bubble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What if those are VR bubbles?

  59. But everyone else is in a bubble too by DavenH · · Score: 1

    "Losing touch with reality" -- makes the implication that someone has an authoritative perspective on reality.

    1. Re:But everyone else is in a bubble too by gDLL · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Someone usually is an authority in at least one aspect of reality.

  60. Adlib as it may be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    , perhaps in theory the author is more contemplating a general idea of change in the atmosphere, but is more aware of an industry of which the author is a part. It is more likely something to do with the massive amounts of propaganda the US population has been experiencing particularly since NDAA 2012 allowing Psyop to be established news while leveling the playing field under the guise of fake news while constantly peddling disinformation. The end result is a nation of high functioning retards that certainly does not exclude the tech industry being full of academics who are never wrong.

  61. Oh, C'mon. by hey! · · Score: 2

    We're nerds.

    We say blunt and undiplomatic things, and are comfortable with other people like ourselves because it's easy to know what's on their mind. Of course that's a stereotype; it represents the extreme of the scale, but most of us at least lean a bit toward that end of the spectrum.

    The thing is as you get older you realize that sustainable success in life has two sides: exploiting your strengths and compensating for your weaknesses, and a preference for bluntness over social nuance is both a strength and a weakness. The dangers of social nuance are a fact, as objective as any other fact, and that means you can't blythely ignore other peoples' feelings and consider yourself a realist.

    Mark Zuckerberg is 33, an age which, back in the day, a bright young guy would maybe have just clawed his way onto the bottom rung of the upper management. Now he's one of the masters of the universe, and still making the kind of mistakes that didn't prevent him from getting where he is today. The thing about mistakes though is that they don't always get you right away. Sometimes they catch up with you. But he's a young dog yet; maybe he'll learn new tricks.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  62. Because California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because "Silicon Valley" is in the people's republic of Kalifornia

  63. Plutocrats be plutocrats by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    How is this different from Wall Street plutocrats of the Thurston Howell type? They've been with us since the industrial age, and in royalty before that in the "let them eat cake" sense.

  64. trumps fault.. uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been 'out of touch' for decades, and it has fuck all to do with trump.

    Try looking in a mirror, you dumbells.

  65. Fire House Effect by AllSeeingAllKnowing · · Score: 2

    The topic is right on. I see it all the time in trading... The Firehouse Effect is a notion attributed to a veteran market trader Marty O’Connell “that firemen with much downtime who talk to each other for too long come to agree on many things that an outside, impartial observer would find ludicrous”. Also Silicon Valley violates the principles of good decision making as outlined in Wisdom of the Crowds by James Surowiecki. Good decision making by groups: Diversity of opinion - Each person should have private information even if it's just an eccentric interpretation of the known facts. Independence - People's opinions aren't determined by the opinions of those around them. Decentralization - People can specialize and draw on local knowledge. Aggregation - Some mechanism exists for turning private judgments into a collective decision. SV has become a hotbed of McCarthyism in reverse.

  66. Great Article! by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is like Antifa trying to explain fascism to itself.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  67. creative use of recursion by hmadrone · · Score: 1

    The commentator's rant is perfectly self-referential: an apt example of everything he's complaining about. I can't decide if he's a complete genius or utterly clueless, but in either event, his rant is a work of art.

    Also, can we just stop patting tech people on the back for being brilliant? There's little evidence of that these days. A lot of tech people now are highly trained performers who are skilled at the one thing they actually do, but maybe not overall the brightest crayons in the box. Tech hiring practices emphasize jumping through hoops to the exclusion of creativity or the ability to think about problems from multiple angles.

  68. Many industries by PPH · · Score: 1

    I've seen this effect outside of Silicon Valley as well. Particularly in a one company or industry town. Seattle and Boeing some 20 or 30 years ago come to mind. People only associate with their company/industry peers and they develop a group think that begins to diverge from the rest of the world.

    Scott Adams (Dilbert) referred to these people as technological savants. Smart enough to solve the most challenging problem in their own field. But too stupid to compare two paychecks. The problem goes way beyond paychecks in that management is most content when they don't have to put up with people who point to another industry and tell them that someone else might have a better idea.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  69. i can find no evidence in the authors statements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a white knight inferuority issue to me. The boomers are complete idiots and its just tremdy to talk shmack about milennials. How is the Valley less out of touch than the racist republicans? They're regressing back to drug war dog whistle and abortion politics.

  70. What exactly is he talking about? by jader3rd · · Score: 2

    The author makes some vague references, but doesn't provide any examples. I don't know what he's talking about. For all I know the people in Silicon Valley are in touch with reality and the author is so far out of touch that he can't recognize when he sees it.

    1. Re:What exactly is he talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article is absolute crap. should never have been green lighted.
      It reads like a last minute term paper I submitted in the 9th grade on crap I made up and counting words and adding in adjectives to meet the length requirement.

  71. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a pretty shitty one at that. While I might agree, (also I don't have to....) author shows no reason I should; it's written at the level of middle school, as is The New York Times these days. The Valley isn't getting dumber; Americans are. Crap sites like what Slashdot has become are contributing factors, and people are, evidently, willing test subjects.

  72. I won' name names or give examples... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I won't name names or give examples because I'm not an asshole.

    well he probably should, otherwise what's the point of the article?

  73. horoscope ethics by epine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah...the author seems to make a LOT of assumptions that everyone knows what he is talking about, as far as opinions and all.

    He never gave a single example of one of these thoughts the Silicon Valley folks have that are out of touch.

    Horoscope: Someone you thought was pretty smart will say something odd.

    Reader: Odd how?

    Horoscope: You don't know the first thing about horoscopes, do you?

  74. You are obviously frustrated... by Sla$hPot · · Score: 0

    ... about your self for belonging to the group of people you hate on. Including your apparent resemblance with Trump. At least Trump doesn’t lie about his intentions like you do.

  75. No support for your argument by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

    You imply people are saying and doing things that are out of touch but you never say what those things actually are and who they're out of touch with? This is akin to the homeless guy on the corner constantly saying "it's the governments fault!".

  76. Lefties still don't get it by es330td · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a man who has gotten ahead in life by saying asinine things

    The left, and many on the right, fail to grasp how incredibly shrewd Trump is. I don't much care for him as a person but the facts are undeniable that he is a successful real estate developer in NYC. It doesn't matter if his original seed money came from his father, one does not build ANYTHING in Manhattan without having a lot of clues. A great many things involving a large number of stakeholders have to happen to build a project and he did it multiple times.

    In his first full attempt at public office (continued to the actual election), he ran for the highest office in the world and won. The man beat first the GOP, of which he was only peripherally a member that was united against him, and then beat the MSM and the career politician who was supposed to be the pre-determined next POTUS.

    People think him to be a clown because he doesn't talk like a lawyer and then underestimate him. Sun Tzu said "If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles." Only one side in this battle knew the truth about the enemy.

    Most people forget that what a person wants is very different from what they buy. A person buying a drill didn't want a drill, they need to make a hole. Even the hole was only necessary because the person actually just needed to mount a shelf. The Democrats kept saying "Look at our great drill and all the features it has. You have to get it because it is the best drill." Trump said "I'll hang your shelf."

    1. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was going to mod up but decided to comment instead.

      I think this is the most rational, observant, and insightful post I have ever seen written about who Trump is and how he won the election.

    2. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people forget that what a person wants is very different from what they buy. A person buying a drill didn't want a drill, they need to make a hole. Even the hole was only necessary because the person actually just needed to mount a shelf. The Democrats kept saying "Look at our great drill and all the features it has. You have to get it because it is the best drill." Trump said "I'll hang your shelf."

      No, Trump says "I'll just burn your house down." Problem solved!

    3. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Especially the last paragraph about the drill.

    4. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You're referring to the Donald Trump that lost all his money in real estate, and had to be bailed out by his dad passing in the 1990s? The same Trump who needed to become more entertainment icon than developer to maintain his refreshed fortune? You're referring to the Donald Trump whose primary real estate competition in the New York City area basically called him an idiot, said he wasn't worth their time, and is now worth four times what he's worth (even including the fact that he needed that infusion from his Dad's death) 25 years later? We're talking about that Donald Trump?

      What a loser.

    5. Re:Lefties still don't get it by benjfowler · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's NOT successful. He is a terrible businessman, who's declared bankruptcy six times.

      Furthermore, he has a terrible reputation for stiffing his suppliers and creditors. And he has managed to lose money operating casinos. If he isn't an outright criminal, laundering money for the Mob (as is strongly suspected to be a de-facto member of Russian organised crime, having repeatedly failed as a legitimate businessman, only to find himself "bought" by the bratva), then he would have to be utterly useless as business.

      What's Trump's edge? Balls-out shamelessness, a massive ego, and a total lack of self-awareness that would enable him to gamble (and lose) in a way no ordinary, rational person would. The only people who associate with him are oligarchs and gangsters (usually the Russian kind).

      Charles Munger famously said that if Trump wasn't such a dickhead, and has put his inheritance into a passive stock fund, he'd be richer than he is today, with far less effort.

      THAT'S how much of a fucking idiot Trump is. No credit where it isn't due, please.

    6. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you're right about everything else - the last paragraph you wrote is just pandering to authoritarianism.

    7. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HahaHA! Your tears are delicious in my tea.

      As horrible as you think he is, he still beat Hillary. What does that say about her?

      So very delicious.

    8. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author goes on to blame Trump which just shows how stupid the author actually is. Then he claims that Silicon Valley has the smartest people in the world which is nothing more than arrogance. They are clueless in Silicon Valley.

    9. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Fuck off.

    10. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trump said "I'll hang your shelf."

      Hahahahahaha. Trump spewed a stream of words, often directly contradicting something he said previously... so he can always point back and say, "I told you!", while claiming the contradiction was out of context or just him messing around.

      Trump takes all sides in an argument if you let him talk long enough.

      He doesn't stand for anything but himself.

    11. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That she didn't need to lie about how the electoral college was the reason for his victory not actually being anywhere near a landslide as he falsely claimed.

      Apparently he couldn't beat Hillary, in fact, he barely squeaked by, thanks to an arcane electoral system, then couldn't be honest about it.

      Got to admit, your tea is obviously flavored with a load of Trump-Urine. The all-natural artificial additive. You praise the vintage.

    12. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem with that is trump does not know himself. Completely delusional on that front.

    13. Re:Lefties still don't get it by alexanderhlau · · Score: 1

      I hate Donald Trump, but I agree. He's smart but he acts dumb. That's why he's dangerous. He knows Nazis are bad. He knows everything he says is evil. And yet he chooses to anyway. It makes him a horrible, evil, lying dictator on par with Hitler or Nero. Our only hope is that some Secret Service member puts a bullet through his head before Trump chooses to start a nuclear war so he can get re-elected/become king.

    14. Re:Lefties still don't get it by es330td · · Score: 2

      He's NOT successful. He is a terrible businessman, who's declared bankruptcy six times.

      Trump has never personally declared bankruptcy, only entities he has formed. This is part of business. In any business transaction both sides hope to gain from the interaction and should price the risk of non-payment or default into the deal. Only the foolish assume the other party will perform. If one is unwilling to risk then pass on the deal.

      In baseball a batter that is successful one time in three is considered an overwhelming success. Trump is principal owner of over 500 businesses. If failure is six times out of 500, please let me be a failure like that.

    15. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      As horrible as you think he is, he still beat Hillary. What does that say about her?

      That the 2016 Presidential Election had the two worst candidates I've ever seen? I'll certainly give you that. Hillary was the lesser of two evils, but I don't blame anyone for refusing to vote for either.

    16. Re:Lefties still don't get it by GoatJuggler · · Score: 1

      Most people forget that what a person wants is very different from what they buy. A person buying a drill didn't want a drill, they need to make a hole. Even the hole was only necessary because the person actually just needed to mount a shelf. The Democrats kept saying "Look at our great drill and all the features it has. You have to get it because it is the best drill." Trump said "I'll hang your shelf."

      I stared at this paragraph and reread it for a full 15 minutes whilst the construct around me collapsed and a new framework of thinking was supplanted. Thanks for this insight, friend.

    17. Re:Lefties still don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80,000 businesses in the usa declare bankruptcy every year.

  77. I have no idea what you are talking about. by TheStickBoy · · Score: 1

    Quote: "I'd wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I'm talking about "

    I have no idea what you are talking about.

    You lost the bet MG Siegler.

  78. Yes, this is true by tacokill · · Score: 1

    Anyone paying attention over the last 5-7 years knows this is true.

  79. News for Nobody. Stuff that doesn't matter. by Arkham · · Score: 1

    Seriously some of my brain cells died a little reading this. It looks like something the author scribbled in his My Little Pony journal.

    I don't work in Silicon Valley; I went there once. My parent company is there, and the people who work on the campus there are smart, insightful, and hard working. I have no idea what the "author" is talking about, and from the other comments, neither does anyone else.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
  80. Such as....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The journalism in this article is deplorable. Give me a quote from a person who works in silicon valley that makes me agree with their article. The whole thing is written as if its just an opinion piece.

    The REAL issue with media today is that somehow, not backing up your argument with fact is just ok.

  81. Has the author spent time in any groups? by quantaman · · Score: 2

    I remember working in a moving company in high school, some of the guys would make ridiculously racist jokes they'd be ashamed to repeat elsewhere.

    I've been in a bar with skilled labour types, they made dumbass political statements that have no bearing on reality.

    Every little subculture creates their own little reality, of course silicon valley folks are making statements among themselves that make sense in no other context. I don't think silicon valley is worse than any other culture in this regard. And outside of the occasional bad startup idea I don't think their weird quirks are really causing problems.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  82. The pot calling the kettle black by William+Baric · · Score: 1

    People—really smart people—saying some of the most vacuous things [... ] Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump

    I think this guy seriously lack self-awareness.

  83. Take a step outside by portwojc · · Score: 1

    "I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole."

    Proceeds to throw out a couple names... Trump and Zuckerberg both who are right now easy targets.

    " Though, admittedly, I sometimes play one on the internet too."

    Perhaps he should have stepped outside before posting this on the Internet.

  84. There is no actual content in this article beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no actual content in this article beyond its headline.

  85. I've thought people were just getting dumber by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    It's seemed like everywhere I looked, not just Flint, Michigan, had lead in their drinking water or something, because it's seemed like people were getting dumber and dumber over time, and more and more disturbed, instead of smarter and more stable. But perhaps this person has hit upon it: more and more people are out-of-touch with reality? Consider also the opioid/fentanyl addiciton/overdose problem, and more and more people (apparently) taking up smoking in one form or another, regardless of the mountains of evidence that shows it's just plain bad for you; are people just trying to escape a world that's getting shittier and shittier, year after year? I think that might be why. I read in bed for a few minutes every night so I don't go to sleep thinking about the days' problems, and I get lots of exercise (7 to 15 or more hours a week, every week) both of which help me combat a shitty world dragging me down. Perhaps too many other people are escaping in other ways?

    1. Re:I've thought people were just getting dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and more and more people (apparently) taking up smoking in one form or another, regardless of the mountains of evidence that shows it's just plain bad for you

      First of all, there is no evidence of "more and more people" taking up smoking. Second of all, though smoking is bad, the canon which is the Surgeon Generals report from the 1970's (still valid today) shows something weird, which is that pipe tobacco smokers that do not inhale live longer than people who do not smoke, and those that do inhale live as long as people that don't smoke. What this actually means is that though smoking is bad, smoking natural tobacco is not as bad as it is made out to be. Generations of native americans smoking tobacco never got cancer. What really has occurred is the chemical revolution of the 1950's that Big Tobacco utilized to increase addiction lead to these things called cigarettes that actually contain very little tobacco, and it is mostly a constructed chemical delivery system that intentionally includes chemicals to numb the throat and increase the speed of the delivery of the nicotine that all happen to be carcenagenic and are absent from natural tobacco. So here we have a situation where you think you know what you are talking about (re: "smoking is bad for you") when the reality is smoking synthtic carcinagenic chemicals is the problem. All or very nearly all national brands of cigarettes have this problem: they kill people in droves. Those people would still be alive if they actually smoked tobacco and not whatever the fuck is in cigarettes.

      The moral here is "do not assume you know what you're talking about just because you believe it to be common knowledge." You do not, and there is bullshit everywhere. You are better off assuming everything you believe is probably incorrect.

    2. Re:I've thought people were just getting dumber by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

      Oh shut the fuck up. Smoking is bad no matter how you do it. You must be a smoker yourself to have written all that (most of which I didn't bother to read). STFU. In 2018 there is no excuse for someone taking up smoking. Period. DGAF if you like what I'm saying or not.

    3. Re:I've thought people were just getting dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, let's not let the actual science get in the way! Smoking bad! Fuck the Surgeon General!

      /feed the moron

    4. Re:I've thought people were just getting dumber by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1
      Show us your peer-reviewed double-blind blind-funded University studies that conclusively show that ANY form of smoking whatsoever is completely harmless.

      Pro-tip: YOU CAN'T

      Enjoy your CANCER, loser.

    5. Re:I've thought people were just getting dumber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I accept your challenge.

      From theUS Surgeon General Report "Smoking and Health"(big pdf)

      No. 1103, p.112

      Death rates for current pipe smokers were little if at all higher than for non-smokers, even with men smoking 10 pipefuls per day and with men who had smoked pipes for more than 30 years.

      (No. 1103, page 92)

      Among the pipe smokers.... The US mortality ratios are 0.8 for non-inhalers and 1.0 for inhalers.

      ...which means pipe smokers who inhale live as long as nonsmokers, and pipe smokers that don’t inhale live longer than non-smokers.

      And everyone has cancer. Every single living human currently has cancer. It is the ability to slough off cancer cells that is what is important, you Dunning-Kruger Effect dipshit.

  86. You can just stop read at "San Francisco" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what the deal is with people confusing the two, but San Francisco is NOT Silicon Valley (the cool/hip guys up there called us residents of Silicon Valley "Nerdville" when I lived in Santa Clara during the 1980s/1990s!)

    1. Re:You can just stop read at "San Francisco" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      San Francisco is not Silicon Valley, but there is a lot of overlap, much much more than there used to be. The Dot-Com bubble spread the tech world to SF, and since tech rebounded after the crash, San Francisco has been firmly part of that world.

    2. Re: You can just stop read at "San Francisco" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too bad. There was a pretty good distinction of us SV residents being slightly conservative and super hard-working vs the SF crowd being ultra-liberal, artsy types back then. I had really hoped these types of articles were just written by outsiders who were too arrogant and clueless to know the difference.

    3. Re: You can just stop read at "San Francisco" by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      There's still a lot of SF that is NOT tech, probably more than Santa Clara or Cupertino have. So there's still that.
      But they've been more and more getting pushed out of San Francisco as tech has causes living expenses to rise.

  87. Reality is overrated by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 0

    Ends with: It's basically Trump's fault that people in Silicon Valley are in a bubble.

    Although TFA actually does use the word "blame" it's obvious that blame isn't what he really meant:

    Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump, even if only indirectly (a man who has gotten ahead in life by saying asinine things).

    He's actually citing Trump as an example. And Trump really does say outright obviously stupid, asinine things. Instead of taking that as an attack on Trump, though, maybe people ought to take that as evidence that it's ok to say stupid, asinine things. Maybe it really is ok to talk out your ass. Just what are the consequences?

    If you say stupid things, people won't hold that against you in a voting booth.

    If your service is stupid, inconvenient and causes harm to users, users won't hold that against you.

    Losing touch with reality is just fine. Dare to be stupid!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  88. The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silicon Valley is full of members of the intellectual-yet-idiot class:

    https://medium.com/incerto/the-intellectual-yet-idiot-13211e2d0577

    1. Re:The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Informative

      Says a commentator who despises everybody who doesn't fit his private little set of personal crotchets, none of which really relate to Silicon Valley. Who in hell is Nassim Taleb, anyway?

    2. Re:The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this post.
      I just spent the last 2+ hours reading material that is actually intellectually stimulating an useful, instead of more /. rants.

    3. Re: The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nassim Taleb a leading expert on derivatives and the philosophy of risk, professor of finance at a leading university, best selling author, and self-made multimillionaire.

      So slightly more accomplished than the typical Slashdot commentator.

    4. Re: The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nassim Taleb a leading expert on derivatives and the philosophy of risk, professor of finance at a leading university, best selling author, and self-made multimillionaire.

      So slightly more accomplished than the typical Slashdot commentator.

      Posting as Anon because I'm also mod'ing.

      But that's not why they discuss Taleb and interestingly its also a good illustration of the article's original point. Taleb isn't discussed for his finance, its because he has a crackpot theory about physics that he claims to explain the quantum world better than the standard model. Somehow his theory became a fad in SV circles arising from the local EDM scene (same place the flat earth movement came from). And then, when someone mentions Taleb in passing, you come back with his actual accomplishments, like those make him an expert in physics (it doesn't). This is exactly the sort of intellectual masturbation that we are discussing. Taleb has no real claims to being an expert in physics, but since he is smart and made some money in the market he must also be able to disrupt the world of physics. Its this sort of break from reality that even Trump supporters can see that is exactly what the article is talking about.

    5. Re: The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taleb's article is about the pseudo-intelligentsia amongst the self-professed elites, not about his writings on physics. The respondent also asked who Nassim Taleb is; now they know.

    6. Re: The Intellectual-yet-Idiot (Nassim Taleb) by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Ah, financial derivatives. Replacing fundamental investment analysis by short-term playing with paper. One of the great wastes of human brainpower.

  89. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do less.

  90. Meanwhile no1curr what you say.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..do they? Nope. Youre just igorant assholes, aka Anericans, and you ALL sound like morans to the rest of the world.

  91. "some of the most brilliant people in the world" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on what? Slinging some shit code around to process ad data? Who cares.

  92. FTFY by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

    You can see it in the tweets. You can hear it at tech conferences. Hell, you can hear it at most cafes in San Francisco on any given day. People -- like M.G. Siegler -- saying some of the most vacuous things. Words that if he were able to take a step outside of his own head and hear, he'd be embarrassed by. Or, at least, these are stances, thoughts, and ideas that he should be embarrassed by. But he's clearly not because he keeps saying them. This isn't only about Facebook -- far from it. That's just the most high profile and timely example of a company suffering from some of this. And in that case, it's really more in his responses to the Cambridge Analytica situation, rather than the situation itself (which is another matter, though undoubtedly related). He doesn't know the right things to say because he doesn't know what to say, period. Because he's slipped out of touch.

    --
    Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
  93. SJW by huckamania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll give it a shot.

    An SJW is someone who thinks that people who do not support their pet issue should be publicly shamed and extra-judiciously punished for not supporting their pet issue. Typically they identify themselves as victims of straight white males. When not online, they enjoy spending time in mobs while repeating slogans and protesting the world.

    Not really that hard.

    1. Re:SJW by david_thornley · · Score: 1, Troll

      Scratch that about straight white males and you've got a lot of right-wing groups on that definition. The right wingers tend to blame blacks, non-Christians, scientists, and other groups, not straight white males.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A good start.

      It's the difference between progressive and regressive (SJW).

      A progressive wants to improve life for all. A regressive wants to mainly focus on those ranked higher on the "progressive stack".

      A progressive tries their best to be "color blind" (as in, all people should be treated the same, everyone should have the same opportunities). A regressive believes that things like skin color and sexuality are more important than values or content of character.

      A regressive will place those higher on the progressive stack on pedestals; you cannot joke or criticize these people, but you can joke, criticize, or wish death upon those lower on the progressive stack.

      A regressive thinks in black-and-white terms with little nuance. You are either 100% with their cause, or you are 100% against. There is typically very little middle ground in their mind.

      A progressive uses "privilege" to make people think about their position (i.e. "You (male/female) never have to think about which bathroom you have to go into. Other people would like to feel that way too."). A regressive uses "privilege" to shame and guilt, much like bad religious institutions (i.e. "Check your privilege!").

      A regressive is fine with segregated spaces, but only for those higher on the progressive stack (such as black-only college dorms); anyone lower must 100% not have any space only for their .

      A progressive might respect culture but understands it can be fluid and not everyone celebrates all aspects of cultures the same (especially in melting pots such as the US). A regressive believes cultural appropriation is everywhere and that there is an inherent "cultural copyright" that only members of said culture can participate or allow others to participate in (while being uneducated about the origins of certain things, such as dreadlocks, or believing that only Mexicans can wear sombreros).

      A progressive believes that even though people have done bad things in the past (or even present), blame is not to be put upon those that are part of those groups that did not take action in those things. A regressive believes in original sin (particularly for those lower on the progressive stack) and that blame and responsibility should be shared across generations and groups.

      A progressive believes that, even if what one says is terrible and disgusting, people have the right to express their views. A regressive believes that anything they deem bad should be suppressed at all costs; violence and censorship are perfectly fine to use ("no bad tactics, only bad targets").

      I think you get the idea...

    3. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is one of the most well thought out and intelligent comments I have read in years. That's the kind of thing which should be shared everywhere possible. I hope as many people as possible read that and spread it around.

    4. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emphasis on the "Warrior" part. They are the type of people who uncritically attack someone for expressing an opinion, but do nothing when one of their friends commits a crime. (There are non-Social Justice types similar to this, like certain Christian groups/people, but the Social Justice movement has gained power recently, so that's why they are most visible.)

      GhostBusters 2016 is a perfect example. People where defending that movie before it even came out. James Rolfe got shit on because he said he wasn't going to see the movie. He explained his reasoning in a perfectly calm fashion that didn't deserve the scorn.

    5. Re: SJW by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The difference between left-wing and right-wing extremists is who they hate. The language and behaviour is very similar.

    6. Re: SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I really appreciate that. :)

    7. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a very nice and friendly definition of "progressive" - but not an accurate one.

      A progressive believes that human beings can be improved (make "progress") by external forces.
      This leads to the obvious next step, which is that powerful governments are the best tools for "improving" people.

      Pol Pot, the Kim family, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler all approve of this plan.

    8. Re:SJW by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      Those are your ideas about what an SJW is. But other people clearly have other definitions. That's the issue here, no one knows that's what you mean when you say SJW, they just fill in whatever they prefer and nod along.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard the phrase "hierarchy of grievances" instead of "progressive stack". I like hierarchy phrasing better.

    10. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lefites hate themselves, while righties hate everyone else.

    11. Re: SJW by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      It's called horseshoe thoery. The extremes of any spectrum are more alike to eachother than the moderates.

    12. Re:SJW by Pubstar · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the communities that I am involved with, this pretty much sums up the definition of SJW. The fastest way to tell if someone is fighting for rights and being a progressive or they are a SJW - If the words "internalized racism/misogyny" is ever used when a woman or POC disagrees with someone on how something should be handled, they are a SJW.

    13. Re:SJW by pz · · Score: 2

      I think you have the progressive and regressive labels switched.

      In particular here ...

      A progressive believes that, even if what one says is terrible and disgusting, people have the right to express their views.

      In my experience, those who label themselves as progressives will shout down differing opinions rather than allow them to be heard. I have many, many Thanksgiving dinners to hold up as proof.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    14. Re:SJW by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Not really that hard.

      You're right, being narrow minded is rather simple.

      The hard thing is not bucketing your fellow man and labeling them with things like "redneck", "SJW", etc.

    15. Re: SJW by eaglesrule · · Score: 0

      The right wing extremists have a bit of catching up to do then, it seems. I haven't observed any right-wing extremists shutting down political rallies, smashing storefronts, or shouting down public speakers on campus lately.

    16. Re:SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I look at it using the definition I see on Wikipedia, which includes, "As a philosophy, it is based on the Idea of Progress, which asserts that advancements in science, technology, economic development, and social organization are vital to the improvement of the human condition." Which your definition seems to agree with, though I think it's less authoritarian than then examples you gave. I don't think that's an "obvious next step" for the government to become a brutal regime.

      I know what a "progressive" these days is extremely murky; it's hard to pin down a concrete definition when so many people misuse it (regressives saying that they're progressive is probably the biggest part).

      Freedom is still an important aspect, which I know people would argue is not necessarily a tenant of progressivism. Not sure what else I would really call the political stance that I wrote about other than progressive.

    17. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A progressive can use context to determine intent and, accordingly, a proper response. A regressive decides when I should be offended.

    18. Re: SJW by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      The pendulum swings back and forth on this. As society becomes more liberal or conservative, the opposite sides extremists start to come out of the wood work. It's apt to say that the current tactics and ideas of the left resemble the moral panic of the right in past years.

    19. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds vaguely "Goofus and Gallant" like, if anyone gets that reference.
      I'm guessing you want to be a progressive Gallant.

    20. Re: SJW by StevenMaurer · · Score: 0

      The right wing extremists have a bit of catching up to do then, it seems. I haven't observed any right-wing extremists shutting down political rallies, smashing storefronts, or shouting down public speakers on campus lately.

      Truth

      Right wingers generally stick to murdering people.

      They murder more cops too

    21. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are good examples, except you seem to be confusing 'progressive' with 'libertarian' :-)

    22. Re:SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      Don't Libertarians not believe in social programs? I think that's a part of being progressive, since not everyone is born into equal circumstances.

    23. Re:SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I do realize that with some words these days, it can be hard to point to a concrete definition. It's true, that some people will simply use "SJW" as "anyone to the left of me" or "anyone on the left". But there is a divide between progressives and regressives. I hope what I wrote help explains what I see, at least.

    24. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were attacking Ghostbusters 2016 before it even came out...

    25. Re:SJW by Stolovaya · · Score: 1

      I had never seen "Goofus and Gallant", but yeah, seems like I have a similar format. :)

      A bit. One doesn't have to be crazy pious or anything...

    26. Re:SJW by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      In the example I gave of that episode of Star Trek the guy who posted the video and half the commentators were using "SJW" to refer to the conservative woman leading the witch hunt. She was a classic "hawk" character, overly concerned with national security and more than willing to destroy innocent lives in its name.

      Picard is clearly on the left. Strong supporter of a post-capitalist, post-feminist, not quite post-racial society and a strong ally of the poor guy being persecuted. He believes strongly in social justice and says as much in his speech. Picard won't have any of her anti-Romulan racism and is happy to call her a villain when she deserves it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re: SJW by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      If we're going to have a tit for tat about left vs right body count, Communists have Fascists and Nazis well beaten on that score.

    28. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you hear about Tyrone? You know, the guy giving people instructions on how to kill liberals at that peaceful rally of Neo-Nazis that you thought was good people?

    29. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right wing extremists have a bit of catching up to do then, it seems. I haven't observed any right-wing extremists shutting down political rallies, smashing storefronts, or shouting down public speakers on campus lately.

      You must have missed their actions at Malfeur, preceded by Bundy Ranch, or their recent conviction. Not to mention their fraternity hijinks.

      But perhaps you had your eyes and ears covered, so you couldn't see a thing.

      This is how you lose credibility, by the way, by being out of touch with reality.

    30. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, I had heard that some people who owned cars that didn't get as good gas mileage as some other cars, had their tires slashed by people that others called "SJW's"... because of course, if you drive a car at all, you at evil, and if your car is not the most gas-efficient car available you are decidedly in need of direct action punishment.

      you know, maybe they should have simply lynched the drivers when they found them?

    31. Re: SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they're about 2% of the way there. How does that change the claim that they have a lot of catching up to do?

    32. Re:SJW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point for that would be that regressives call themseves progressives.

  94. Techbros enabled Russian aggression by benjfowler · · Score: 0

    Unsurprising, really. Technolibertarian idiots were spending so much time getting high on their own farts to notice that the real world is NOT a nice place. That it's full of criminals, opportunists and fascists who are only too happy to exploit the weak and vulnerable -- and with the powerful tools that techno-liberscum handed to them, can now brainwash people in the West at a click of a mouse.

    Thus, the Russian aggressors were pushing on an open door. Silicon Valley have betrayed us all, by handing the criminal Chekist scum that hijacked Russia, the keys to the Western kingdom.

    I've always hated techno-liberscum, but after seeing how they facilitated Russia's mind-rape of the West in 2014 onwards, I felt vindicated.

    Propaganda works. And the enemy is as much Silicon Valley, as it is Putin's Russia.

    1. Re:Techbros enabled Russian aggression by eaglesrule · · Score: 1

      Made up words, or overly creative euphemisms: check
      a grain of truth: check
      promoting a narrative: double check

      When you say that propaganda works, is that from experience?

  95. Author Literally Provides Nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I won't give examples because I'm not an asshole..." I get not providing names. That part made sense, cool. But he provided no examples of exactly what sort of language he was referring to. Period. There are several inferences I can make regarding this being associated with the Facebook handling of data and similar situations. But there's literally NOTHING providing an example of what language. This is just... vapid pandering. It's like the author wanted to develop a piece that everybody that didn't like tech could pile on and link to reliably. You can't argue him in any capacity - because he provides nothing to argue against specifically. You could bring up any aspect of the conversation related to the response to FB/CA and the entire Trump/Russia thing and he has the full ability to say "I wasn't talking about that."

    This work seems, quite literally, whether right or wrong headed, designed to just rile people up and say nothing.

  96. Not just silicon valley by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    The bubble is also DC, the NYC area, LA/Hollywood. In other words, the "elite" of society, thing EVERYONE, lives, breathes, acts like they do, think like they do. The 2016 election, shook them up a bit because the country didn't side with Hillary.

    1. Re:Not just silicon valley by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

      This bubble is also in America and all first world countries.

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    2. Re:Not just silicon valley by ThomasBHardy · · Score: 1

      This bubble is also on planet Earth... all human populated worlds, really.

      --
      Warning: Teh poster of this messaeg is lysdexic
    3. Re:Not just silicon valley by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's also plenty of bubbles outside the "elite". There's poor rural bubbles, for example, where nobody thinks why things are different in the cities.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  97. We voters were way ahead of you ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... because we already knew about it and we've fixed it.

    WE VOTED TRUMP INTO THE WHITE (GLASS) HOUSE

    Yes, we targeted Trump and his entire orbit including those guilty of systemic sexual harassment, white nationalism, fraud, blackmail, money laundering, electioneering and, yes, even the people who wouldn't do anything sensible to at least try to reduce injuries and deaths by way of personal handguns and rifles.

    We knew that Trump, as a president, would be under the microscope.

    The Access Hollywood tape had been around awhile and we wanted that out there.

    During the campaign, sure enough, the KKK people took off their hoods! Bonus. Notice that fire is tamped down now, but it's too late. Our LEOs have a year of video and photographic evidence that we have scanned through facial recognition and all your base are belong to us.

    Our work has been fruitful.

    Think of the many politicians that have met their political demise via exposure of their sexual indiscretions.

    Look at Trump's lawyer, Cohen, who is in deep shit.

    Look at Hannity. We wanted him and Bill O'Reilly and. we calculated to bring down Fox News and flat-line its bias and influence as fake news. That's a work in progress.

    Appreciate that all the work done by lawyers and acquaintances of Trump, intended to shield him from negative press during the campaign, have a dollar value and are categorized as campaign contributions.

    In some cases where individuals said they did shit for Trump on their own, the value of the work exceeds the limit of private campaign donation limits.

    Cohen created companies in Delaware as a dodge in order to hide the transactions, but the companies did not claim the payout as campaign contribution. That's money laundering and other stuff.

    ==

    Intelligent, reasonable, people have long asked for implementation of rational firearm regulation.

    We were not out to get the guns.

    Because more traditional approaches failed to move the needle, (and for other obvious reasons) we decided to pass on Hillary Clinton in favour of Trump.

    Our strategy has worked in that gun sales are at record lows and some gun manufacturers are having fire sales because the batshit crazy #2A assholes were gearing up for a Hillary win and the manufacturers over-produced, and have a shit-load of inventory.

    Gun maker stocks are down and some are even filing for bankruptcy.

    SO, WE DIDN'T TAKE THE GUNS --WE FIXED IT WHERE FEW PEOPLE ARE BUYING THEM

    OK, You may applaud now, and thank you for not cheering and yelling during this presentation.

    Tip jar's on the piano, try the fish.
    .
    .
    © 2018 CaptainDork

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:We voters were way ahead of you ... by sl3xd · · Score: 1

      There's some kind of situation with the fish.

      It's the last thing I remember before I wound up here. At least I think it's the fish. It's hard to tell when you have a muppet moving a light between each of my eyes, shouting something incoherent. Something like... "stay with me!"

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
    2. Re:We voters were way ahead of you ... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Pwning the cons... by giving them everything they wanted.

    3. Re:We voters were way ahead of you ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Yeah, did you read where the Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaign?

      The clear tactic here (to me, feel free to chime in), whether the DNC has standing or not, is to start the discovery proceeding whereby the DNC lawyers will ask the court for documents, devices, and depositions from all parties (f course, Trump is the target).

      If successful, whether the DNC prevails or not, the DNC will get a shit load of free press for a long time to come.

      Also, the DNC will be effectively have its "Mueller Investigation," even if Trump kills that process.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  98. Why I left the bay area - back in '98 by quietwalker · · Score: 1

    The big takeaway I had was that people are deriving identity from self-labeling far more than other places in the country I've lived, and I've lived all over. It seems like it's so terribly important to live up to your label in the bay area that it really defines you, and is how others define you. Everyone is a type of extremist and like any extremist, they place overlarge attention and emphasis on their key issue well past the point of rationality, to the detriment of any other issue, no matter whether it's related or not.

    So the people there made it a horrible place to live.

    I wrote this https://slashdot.org/comments.... about my experiences in the bay area back in the heady days of 1998. It even has some examples.

    I don't think we need to invoke Trump, as per the article. The bay area has always been up it's own ass, though I'll concede it may be getting worse.

  99. They're totally in touch with *their* reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reality is perception based upon your existence. You can only truly be in touch with your reality, that which you live. Attempts to sympathize with someone living a vastly different existence simply modifies your reality, but you're still in touch with it - it's impossible to not be, unless you are experiencing a psychotic break. Watching a TV documentary about poverty in sub-Saharan Africa might cause a small modification to your reality - greater empathy, perhaps a donation to a related charity. Going to work there with Medicins Sans Frontieres is going to create a much larger modification to your reality, but in both cases you'd be in touch with it.

  100. It's the author by jtara · · Score: 1

    It's the author who's lost touch with reality.

    He never does say what "it" is, and somehow expects us to know.

  101. ...and then the author of the article said this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump..." which is exactly what he is talking about in the first place which only goes to show how out of touch he is.

  102. Intelligence Is Compartmentalized. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's an industry filled with some of the most brilliant people in the world, which makes it all the more disappointing."

    Being smart at programming a widget or gathering Investment money doesn't mean you are smart in any other thing. It only means you are brilliant at making a widget or gathering investment money. It doesn't mean you have any clue about how to fix race relations or the economy or that you know a damn thing about the importance of the 2nd amendment.

    When humans attempt to fix any complex system, they almost always make it worse.

  103. Say what? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    I honestly have no idea what this guy is going on about. I hear people say things that sound like technical jargon, I have no idea what they are saying, but it's not really "out of touch".

    I hear a lot of political crap, mostly from facebook, mostly from the opposite of Si Valley, and honestly most of it sounds like russbot vomit. Either that or the US is on the edge of a civil war, waged by a secret far right militia against some "liberal soft coup" that I've never heard of. Does this make me out of touch with reality? Or them? It's difficult to tell sometimes, and depends heavily on reference point.

    I'm thinking this guy is just fishing for examples so we can write an article for him. I conclude this with my need for a tactical retreat to enact my vertical strategy.

  104. Click Bait with Insulting Nonsense by tech_dude123 · · Score: 1

    Here's a more apt article: 'Increasingly, People Everywhere Are Losing Touch With Reality'

  105. By the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck a Zuck.

  106. Screaming with friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's pretty easy to spot signaling behavior.

    These are the people who change their Facebook background quickly and call out anyone who doesn't. The ones who show up to protests and then can't even explain a single thing they want changed. I expect you haven't seen them, but there are lovely videos of chanting people where they interview *everyone* at the protest and not a damned person gives *even one* idea for change, it's all yelling and screaming.

  107. Twilight of the Elites by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    Whatever your take on this story is, read Chris Hayes' "Twilight of the Elites". A lot of the stupid shit you seen in politics, academia, and well, SV, it's all about elites and supposed meritocracies that, acting as optimization systems without proper health-checks, then end up moving into a degenerated state.

  108. Too much microdosing by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    When people are incentivised to think outside the box of course they will be bored shitless with reality - especially the traffic jams! And microdosing lsd before lunch helps that detachment :)

  109. New tagline should be... by MrSavage · · Score: 1

    "Longtime commentator MG Siegler writes" should now be shown as "Know nothing blatherista MG Siegler spews"

  110. oh look another non trump thread polluted by anit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get a life!

  111. You know what I mean by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    I won’t name names or give examples because I’m not an asshole. But also because I don’t have to. I’d wager everyone reading this will have clear and obvious examples of what I’m talking about in their own circles—even if only in their own virtual circles. This is everywhere.

    Hey, those people over there, they are out of touch. I won't say how, but you know what I mean. If you don't, make up something in your head. Then think it, and imagine that's what I'm talking about.

    This article is a big fat troll. Zero substance or data. Just hopping on the "Facebook bad!" bandwagon, but too lazy to discuss why.

  112. Autism Spectrum by sycodon · · Score: 1

    Being smart is very often associated with someone is lands somewhere on the Autism Spectrum.

    Of course that also means that they suffer from a lack of socialization skills, and thus, say stupid shit.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Autism Spectrum by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      What stupid stuff, nothing was mentioned in the article, no examples, no context, this kind of article is normally called waffling on, no meat, nothing. As for IQ vs EQ, intelligence quotient is a measure of the ability to learn by what you have learnt, where as EQ was a simply a buzz term, which really means the ability to read and manipulate emotions, very popular with narcissists (they were skilled at it, not that they felt the slightest twinge at the emotions they were purposefully generating in other people as they manipulated them).

      Perversely enough, that things they call up are all EQ based and nothing what so ever to do with IQ. The coders were controlling bugger all, carrying out the instructions of management who are largely EQ types, master manipulators. Just because you run a tech company, does not mean you are a tech expert, you hire them, they do the work and you claim the credit and the majority of the profits, EQ not IQ.

      How about decades of arrogance taking the piss out of nerds and geeks across the board. People to be routinely ridiculed in media, this ridicule not only not challenged but celebrated. They call us the arrogant ones, the EQ jock straps and cheer leaders. Contrary to the lie, high IQ tech types do no run most of the social media companies, it is manipulative bean counters who run them.

      Most say stupid shit because they are sick of the disingenuous bullshit of the manipulators and the shit ain't stupid just a little mean and a whole lot sarcastic. The waffling in US main stream media is just beyond the pale, the SJW nonsense as taken over by corporate douche bags to make the left look bad is just awful and social media should never ever be real name based, it invites problems.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Autism Spectrum by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Saying something specific (after LEGAL steps on it) would lead to twitter storms, facebook memes, and launching defensive verbal ballistics. Then the litigation and recriminations begin.

      People in The Bay Area have mortgages and rents that are staggeringly expensive, they live packed tight as sardines, waiting on a juicy options and warrants to mature, making payments on cars, and are generally indentured servants of $startup or $current_monopoly. That they blather should be no surprise.

      They say all sorts of silly stuff because they have lots of skin in their particular $game. They must protect $game and $income and $current_gig and so no one will really go out on a limb. No one also wants to start a bear market, either.

      But you're wrong about the US Media swallowing it whole. Although I especially love the UK Net (Go TheRegister!) for their desire to cite the stench, the US media is pretty healthy, save the corporate media that believes they have to be "nice". Depth is where you find it; this has always been the case.

      This is what reddit and other places are for, as well. There's plentiful disingenuous crap, but it's only worse now-- it's always been around. Social media makes it looks worse.... but the stench and methane has been pouring our of SillyCon Valley for decades.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  113. Re: Or if you're creimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #CreimertardVirgin

  114. It's not just Silicon Valley it's everywhere by genfail · · Score: 1

    As time goes on the whole country and even the world becomes more self-absorbed by day. The usual suspects are even showing up here, the right calling out the left, the left calling out the right, Baby Boomers calling out millennial as self absorbed and entitled when baby boomers are the most self absorbed and entitled generation in human history while the selfie obsessed Millennials never fail to point this out. It applies EVERYWHERE, screw you all, and screw /. for letting this obvious vapid click bait onto the front page when it belongs on Facebook.

  115. 1998 called and wants their article back. by shess · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is considered worth posting? Don't get me wrong, I live out here, I've watched things progress, but it's not like reality had a hole where tech fits. Instead, for the most part, tech makes shit up and some of it changes reality. But the vast majority of it is just insanely ill-thought-out and sinks back into the swamp. That's not some weird new state we need to recover from, that's been the status quo in tech for decades. And the tech sector has grown tons in spite of that, with commentators grousing all the way.

    [The above should not be taken as a blessing on the status quo. I've been one of those grousers since the early 90's. But I am also keenly aware that for all that I feel like how things work is embarrassing and we need to do better, I still have no fucking clue how to fix it.]

  116. People everywhere live in a bubble. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't just silicon valley.

    It is California - mainly coastal regions.
    It is NYC.
    It is Washington D.C.

    It is London, Paris, Hong Kong, Tokyo, BsAs, J-Burg.

    It is in rural places around the world too.
    For example, I think:
    * religious people have a mental disorder
    * all drugs should be legal for use by adults
    * all men/women are responsible for their actions.
    * people for gun control have never been confronted by a bull moose or 500+ lb wild hog or black bear charging. Or even been target shooting.
    * people who think solar can solve everything don't live were it rains 200+ days a year.
    * people against all fracking worry too much.
    * people for all fracking don't get hydro-dynamics.
    * people who live were earthquakes and hurricanes happen are idiots.

    But that is just me. I can appreciate that other "smart people" might see things differently and might come up with really good solutions. But we've also seen really stupid solutions proposed for non-issues.

    Peace out, dudes.

  117. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure I've ever seen such a huge response to a textbook troll.

  118. We just need to rotate the view spline by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    All you have to do is rotate the view spline and blockchain the option, and everything will be left as dry.

    It's simple when you do that.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  119. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rofflycacklolulzasaurusmeistersaurusburger

  120. It's an American problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans think: if i am richer than you, I deserved it, you did not deserve it and so you are inferior and I am allowed to treat you like dirt and make up nonsense speak that excludes you from the conversation.

    Remember, the richest man to come out of the Dot com boom was Warren Buffet, because he refused to listen to Silicon Valley's self congratulations.

  121. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by kenwd0elq · · Score: 2

    Insert Morpheus meme picture.....

    What if I were to tell you that it's possible to be anti-Trump, but even more anti-Hillary?

    I didn't like Trump, and didn't vote for him. But President Hillary would have been immeasurably worse.

    I have a political button with a cartoon of Cthulhu, tentacles raised in a "V"; "Vote for Cthulhu! Why Support the LESSER Evil?"

  122. more embarrasing words below by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people in silicon valley are just like people anywhere else. we all do and say stupid things sometimes.

  123. Losing? The Author Is Out Of Touch Too by RonVNX · · Score: 1

    That ship sailed about 20 years ago dude. You're way too close to the problem to see that. Better late than never I guess.

  124. Bannon/Nunes by execthis · · Score: 1

    Bannon/Nunes 2020

  125. Sure Hillary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the plebs would vote for expert killers like you, paradise on earth could be built. On the bones of hundreds of millions of Arabs, which you would kill in the process.

  126. and then he says... by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

    Post about vacuous speech and losing touch then asks if we can blame Trump?
    Pot - meet kettle.

  127. Effective Use of Condescending Clickbait Headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the joke is on everyone inveigled to read the article.

  128. I don't usually comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but this is the dumbest, whiniest, smell-of-hot-garbage, article I've ever read. Not a single example is provided. What an extreme waste of time.

  129. Think about it... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Perhaps we can blame part of it on Trump, even if only indirectly (a man who has gotten ahead in life by saying asinine things).

    You need to have been out of touch with reality in the first place to have voted for Trump.
    Trump is just further perpetuating "fake realities"!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  130. Not the most brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tech used to attract and hire the best and brightest, but it doesn't anymore.

    Current tech industry leaders have apparently never heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect. They hire people who are great at talking the talk. However, really good people -- truly smart and creative people -- are usually not the look-at-me, look-at-me type.

    The best are the best because they know enough to know how little they know and are always trying to learn more. Tech companies only hire people who already know everything, or at least think they do.

    I actually find it ironic that they like to refer to themselves as bar-raisers, rock stars, super heroes, brogrammers, etc.

    On the plus side, they will likely Darwin themselves out of existence with fads like 'raw' water.

  131. Re:This article is the equivalent of a homeless gu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EQ isn't emotions. EQ is the ability to deal with emotions.

  132. Re: Great post about Clinton Valley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How would Hillary, owned by wallsteet but actually competent, have possibly been worse than the con artist salesman that is Trump?

    Are you so willfully ignorant that you don't see how disastrously awful he is?

    Or are you so delusional that you think global warming is fake, poor people are just lazy, and nuclear war just wouldn't be that bad?

    Because you idiots have literally doomed humanity, we're actually right properly fucked and you're responsible

  133. Why did this non-article get accepted by Slashdot? by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

    The author may or may not be right, but he gives no examples and names no names. His "article" is just an assertion that is repeated several times. It appears that standards have fallen at Slashdot.

  134. Topic Author has issues ... by gordguide · · Score: 1

    The Topic Summary is completely unintelligible.

    If there is a crisis in Silicon Valley, it's clearly a crisis in literacy.

  135. Basis - wage gap by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    Be it Silicon Valley or the government itself, the problem is that all those people are living in bubbles brought by income inequality.
    Doesn't matter how much sympathy you have, when you live your life completely surrounded by people that are in a similar situation to yours, and you cannot bother to see other peoples' needs and everyday lives outside your bubble, you cannot understand what you need to do to get in touch with them.
    But this has always been a reality. Silicon Valley is no exception. It's just another elite group.
    The major problem I see these days with Trumpism and all is the polarization and absolute unwillingness to recognize that such a thing exists.
    It is no secret, perhaps only not perceived by the most fanatical Trump fans. He doesn't and has never leaded anything "for the people". He does it for himself. He only "gets" his own interests, the only right thing for him is the way he does things, he's never wrong, and he accepts no outside input unless it's aligned with his own.
    If there are any good outcomes from his government, it'll be about things that attend his own agenda.
    This is nothing new. It has been clear as day and out there for anyone to see for years before the election - he's basically just acting the way he always did, as a prepotent boss, on his shows, and whatnot.
    Silicon Valley is much of the same crap. People keep throwing money at these self professed geniouses that seemingly never had any experiences hanging around with us "normies".
    What you get is a bunch of startups creating crap that only makes sense for themselves. An overpriced juice pack squeezer, a hipster vending machine, urban mobility for the 1%, mobile apps that only solves their own perceived problems.
    The US will never get out of those loops until it seriously starts working on the income gap problem.

    This is also why China is winning. Despite all the flaws of the country, which are huge, the people working there to make things are closer to the average worldwide citizen reality. And even China is quickly becoming elitized, because that's just the model it's following.