im simply making the argument that while it happened as said, maybe it wasnt as big of a deal as it was, maybe they were overly cautious (not a bad thing) and maybe they are now using the issue to pass legislation
as an example in 07 i believe it was in my state of NY they were in the middle of a debate trying to raise taxes on cigarettes in my county. it was a tough battle and they were losing. then all of a sudden there is a wild fire (minnewaska st park) that they blamed on a discarded cigarette.
the problem with that assessment is I was working there at the time and we were informed of a controlled burn to take place that coincided with the discarded cigarette.
the day after they announced it was a smoke, they passed the bill raising taxes
im saying just because something seems impossible doesnt make it so. im not talking specifically about this idea, just the theory that we dont have a way to do it so we shouldnt try is a bad theory
when they originally announced the SLS and orion, the plan was for 2018 or 2019. but the funding got stripped out.
sadly nasa is the red headed stepchild, it is one of the few government orgs that i actually care about and it gets pennies compared to orgs who want to ensure that some mole that no one has ever heard of remains protected. Its wrong
Slashdot Mirror
if i recall correctly, didnt powell get in trouble because of his email issue?
you are moving the goalposts now.
the question is is she allowed to destroy documents on a server when documents from the server are being requested to be turned over
you dont get to decide whats personal and whats business, the DOJ (or agency making the request) decides that
you brought it up simply to cause a flame war though. it has nothing to do with the point being made.
it is true, and yes when she deleted the emails, she was being investigated*
*perhaps investigated is not the correct word, however the facts are she was asked for all her emails and she didnt hand over all her emails.
except for the actual evidence that has come out completely blows that argument out of the water as being false.
My question is why wasnt the friend charged with perjury
perhaps, but not when you are under investigation, rules get stricter, and nothing should be deleted until checked out.
why you gotta go there??? its off topic
offer cheaper internet plans to low-income customers
the prices should be the same for everyone
except for we dont have the facts because they were deleted
except for we have no way of knowing that besides taking her word on it.... and im not comfortable with her word
hence the reason obama is president
if you dont think they deleted for for political gain (protecting themselves from some kind of incrimination) i got this here bridge to sell
and what does that have to do with someone running for president doing it today????
Nothing
bu-bu-but bush, is not a good answer here
most software devs were not the popular kids in HS
as such most software devs understand what its like to be bullied and abused
if anyone gets it, its us
no no no thats not what i am saying.
im simply making the argument that while it happened as said, maybe it wasnt as big of a deal as it was, maybe they were overly cautious (not a bad thing) and maybe they are now using the issue to pass legislation
as an example in 07 i believe it was in my state of NY they were in the middle of a debate trying to raise taxes on cigarettes in my county. it was a tough battle and they were losing. then all of a sudden there is a wild fire (minnewaska st park) that they blamed on a discarded cigarette.
the problem with that assessment is I was working there at the time and we were informed of a controlled burn to take place that coincided with the discarded cigarette.
the day after they announced it was a smoke, they passed the bill raising taxes
pfft, stone tablets and a harder stone chisel ( I wish i was joking but i actually did have to do that before)
yeah.....but how do we know that the drones were the problem and they arent manufacturing one simply to pass legislation? wouldnt be the first time
im saying just because something seems impossible doesnt make it so. im not talking specifically about this idea, just the theory that we dont have a way to do it so we shouldnt try is a bad theory
i just pulled a few. im with you on all the ones you pointed out as well. Lets not jump to conclusions because of a lack of a statement....
the point is not they waste so nasa should spend more
the point is clean up the damn waste so nasa can spend more
still pennies compared to the waste in medicaid and social security, not to mention EBT and lets not even talk what illegal immigration costs us
do the math on those few that i listed, dont even count the ones i didnt like the dept of ed, and if it is more than 30 b, give it to nasa
sure, and we didnt have the tech to send us to the moon in the 60s...but we did it
when they originally announced the SLS and orion, the plan was for 2018 or 2019. but the funding got stripped out.
sadly nasa is the red headed stepchild, it is one of the few government orgs that i actually care about and it gets pennies compared to orgs who want to ensure that some mole that no one has ever heard of remains protected. Its wrong
fair enough. just seems like any of the ones i would have cared about get ignored. (well majority of them i wont say all)
you think people take the white house petitions seriously???? thats adorable