Slashdot Mirror


User: NetNed

NetNed's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
638
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 638

  1. Re:More disturbing on Democrats Ask FBI To Probe Reported FCC Cyberattack (thehill.com) · · Score: 1

    Is your friend a celebrity with a tv show on HBO? If not your friends issues are not even comparable. If Oliver wanted citizenship he'd have it by now. Do people not research anything any more?

  2. Re:More disturbing on Democrats Ask FBI To Probe Reported FCC Cyberattack (thehill.com) · · Score: 1

    I've heard straight up bullshit on his show that he uses to get a laugh. This isn't a left or right issue. If you consider him a "source" for political news coverage you are a fucking moron.

  3. More disturbing on Democrats Ask FBI To Probe Reported FCC Cyberattack (thehill.com) · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Why are people getting their news from John Oliver? If he is so concerned about the US then why, even after being married to a former US solider, is he still under green card residency? Nothing say you care about a country more that having a status of "I kinda want to live there, make money there, raise my kid there, but I can cut and run if it all becomes too much for me to deal with."

    Getting your news from him is like getting your food from a dumpster. It might look alright but it's most likely covered in shit that you can't see that will only prove how stupid it was to do so later.

  4. Huh? on Bill Simmons Says ESPN Blew It By Not Embracing Tech (cnbc.com) · · Score: 1

    Tech? What? ESPN blew it when they decided to push political propaganda on its audiences. I turn on sports to see sports, hear sports, and escape the pc garbage on most other channels. They were thinking they will dictate what the audiences will watch

  5. Was this right before he hit a big red button launching a giant carbon producing SpaceX rocket in to space then turning to the camera with a smile and a big thumbs up??? Gee, that really "hits home". Couldn't have anything to do with him making a lot of money off of carbon credits, could it???

  6. Re:Tech Mahindra SUCKS! on India Tech Giant Warns Trump's 'Radical Shift' to Hurt Industry (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Have heard the same rumbling through out the tech industry again and again that Tech Mahindra is terrible. They are their own reason for losing money. They suck as a company all the way around.

  7. Washington post? Meh... on President Trump's Budget Includes a $2 Trillion Math Error (time.com) · · Score: 1

    So this wasn't an issue with the ACA and most all Obama's budgets, but it is now? Op Ed from Washington Post is about as creditable as a crack head saying they will pay back any money you can loan them.

  8. There was no deal but the CEO said it was because of the plans that Trump hinted at for his trade policies. CNN wouldn't give him good press if he blew them all and gave them ice cream. They are just another 24 hour propaganda machine, like ALL 24 hour news channels. Did people totally forget about the wikileaks stuff or is their world going to end if they acknowledge it?

  9. Google's products are not exactly open source either. Search results are getting more and more controlled from what I have seen. The suggested search is the first proof of this. But yes, if 10 S can not run the legacy stuff it will not be long for this world.

  10. Re:It's a start, but... on India's Infosys To Hire 10,000 American Workers After Trump Criticism (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    You had me till the "minimum wage" comment. They would have a hard time hiring 5 people if all they are offering is that. Hell, a person can work at Home Depot for more. Even in Indiana that's not realistic. Even "slightly above" isn't realistic. You talked about staffing with qualified people then say that about the wage they are going to offer? I don't think they will offer top dollar, but if they want even one people to apply they sure as hell are not going to be offering that little.

  11. I don't think it matters what he does, the opposite side will always disagree with what he does and find holes to poke in it. It's like when the Election was over and Ford announced they were keeping a plant here because of what Trump had hinted at as trade policies. The opposition either ignored it and said it wasn't because of Trump even when Ford's CEO said exactly that in a news conference, they claimed it was always going to stay, or they claimed it wasn't that big a deal and that it wasn't that many jobs. Further to that point if anyone tries to give him credit for anything, the "but but but" police come out with a thousand excuses til sunday as to why he had nothing to do with it or suggest that the thing they are giving him credit for is terrible. Even worse was if you disagreed with the previous administration it wouldn't take long before someone claimed you were racist for having an opinion other than the president. That's why it's so funny to here democrats claim they are so interested in the freedom of speech and open dialog. They are about as open as a bank vault at midnight.

  12. CNN? Yeah, that's a real creditable source for all things Trump. How is that Donna Brazille working out for them??

  13. Funny, these are the same people that creamed themselves when Obama mentioned anything about Mars. But hey, now it "cool your jets man!". Bunch of douche bags

  14. Does no one read the article? Even the little summary has it. "This review is likely to result in a relaxation of the strict protections the previous administration". Likely hardly sounds like enough to make the assumptions in the article. Do people really just glaze over this shit and ignore it? No wonder it's so crazy now a days. People have no reading comprehension anymore. This story is nothing more that an opinionated piece of drivel from a left leaning tech site that doesn't even cover tech well anymore. You can hate Trump as much as you want but if you fall for the bullshit of articles like this one, Trump is the least of your problems.

  15. Hey, maybe we can have a day that is dedicated to open dialogue in science and not try to divert it to one side or the other? Wouldn't that be cool if that could actually happen? OH LOOK! A LBGT person not getting 100% of everyone's attention! Lets go worry about that now!

  16. Re:The dinosaurs are doing fine and dandy on EPA Website Removes Climate Science Site From Public View After Two Decades (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: 1

    That think that was pretty much responsible for human life?? Yeah fuck that thing! I'll stick to false models, pseudoscience and television personalities that portray themselves as scientists. If you excuse me I have to go work on vagina voices.

  17. Now that's funny. I'd give you points if I had them

  18. Re:Washington Post article on EPA Website Removes Climate Science Site From Public View After Two Decades (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: -1, Troll

    Yes, because liberals are so open minded. I mean heck, look at Berkley.........oh wait, quick! look over there instead!

  19. Re:Is the EPA violating the establishment clause? on Energy Department Refuses To Give Trump Team Names of People Who Worked On Climate Change (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1

    Reams? You mean all the models that they have to admit are wrong once they are inspected by someone other then those that make monetary gains said models? Is that evidence a tolerance of ±.1 degrees and a claim that it was warmer by .02 degrees? Do you not know how tolerance works? Are we supposed to ignore math too? Yes, but it is "I" that is hard headed. How about we go through how the whole bullshit 97% number was come too? Odd considering it recently because 99% also without any new studies. Why not look up how often you can really, in a legitimate study that doesn't blur facts and hen peck number, come to a number where 99% of scientists agree on anything. No, better to keep the blinders on and not actually look in to anything.

  20. Re:Is the EPA violating the establishment clause? on Energy Department Refuses To Give Trump Team Names of People Who Worked On Climate Change (businessinsider.com) · · Score: 1

    All while ignoring failed models of the past, claims that can't be backed up, hottest years "ever" that has a tolerance bigger than the number claimed (ie fuck math?) the "rising oceans" that are supposedly swapping low laying countries yet areas of the US coast that are low have not changed. Yes, keep "pounding" it through our heads, because that's worked SOOO well so far. Science left the "all in" crowd of climate change years ago. If it didn't they wouldn't talk in matter of facts, not want to debate a thing, and then claim "the science is settled!" like the science so beyond questioning. Hell after things like CERN bringing in to question Einstein’s theory of relativity, how can any one that is rational say that "the science is settled"?

  21. So do you have the same concerns about what the Obama administration did for international relationships? Because they are A LOT worse then when he took office, unless you want to say bending over for Iran who has already crapped on that deal while taking the money and running, and kissing Cuba's ass offsets the terrible relationship he has had with just about everyone else. But, yeah, lets go with the henny penny "the sky is falling" bullshit routine again. That is what got Trump elected.

  22. I know! Have you seen those computer models?? You know, the computer model that are terrible and 99% of the time wrong (shout out to the 97% that became 99% without any new study) We should all hedge our bets on these models and throw all sorts of cash as them, stop doing all things of daily life, and live in caves in the nude while eating kale. That sounds reasonable!

  23. Re:We knew this going in on Weather Channel To Breitbart: Stop Citing Us To Spread Climate Skepticism (weather.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes, tell us more while ignoring how the 97% number was achieved, the tolerance for the "warmest year EVER!" claim was bigger than the claim of how much warmer it was, the year of record cold all over the world 3 years ago but claimed "warmest year ever", the ignoring of satellite data in temp measurement for the "warmest year ever" claims. Ignoring ice production at Antarctica while claiming it's melting then a bunch of climatologist get stuck frozen in the ice upon a ship that the believers make excuses as to why it happened. The list goes on, but yeah, tell us all about the "lies" you "uncovered". It means SOOO much when you ignore the misinformation, claim you "don't give a flying fuck" about someone that the climate change community used to extort funds out of governments, and then go off about "defending liars" and ending corruption but ignore everything President Obama has done while in office and most likely think he has actually had "the most transparent administration EVER!!!". It's like a crack head telling a heroin addict that he is despicable.

  24. Re:We knew this going in on Weather Channel To Breitbart: Stop Citing Us To Spread Climate Skepticism (weather.com) · · Score: 0

    So is attacking every thing a person does, even without proof, before he is in office but make excuses for the person that is STILL IN OFFICE and making bad, self serving political moves every day.

  25. Re: This works for me on China Chases Silicon Valley Talent Who Are Worried About Trump Presidency (cnbc.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well considering that the Smith Mundt act was repealed under President Obama, our government can now use propaganda on it's citizens. The dumbing down of the snowflake, "lets protest everything" generation makes it easier for them to push that, but they missed one thing. No one trusts the mainstream media here and it's losing viewers left and right. That's why they come up with sensationalism like this story to try and snag a viewer or clicker in with bullshit. Anyone with a little bit of reading comprehension can see past the bullshit. But back to your original, stupid post. Compared to China, we are a thousand times more free. Don't think so? Try the same protest we've seen over here in Tiananmen square. Enjoy the tank tread tattoo.