Maybe you've never considered the jobs that available that require more than one language for the simple fact that you only speak one. Is it not possible that if you spoke another language you would consider opportunities for work in Europe or Asia? Of course if you're one of those guys that sees Texas as the best thing since sliced bread, I guess my point of view is pointless.
He wouldn't have to upgrade the entire network. That is the point of the GP. He can keep all his old stuff on 802.11g and by an 802.11n access point that plugs into the g router. Voila, everything works.
You do understand that the need for NAT stems from the inability to assign everyone a public IPV4 address right? With IPV6, the routing may be similar, but it will not be the same. To quote from the TCP/IP Guide:
Complexity: NAT represents one more complexity
in setting up and managing the network. It also makes troubleshooting
more confusing due to address substitutions.
Problems Due to Lack of Public Addresses:
Certain functions won't work properly due to lack of a âoerealâ IP address in the client host machines.
Compatibility Problems With Certain Applications:
I said above that NAT was only mostly transparent. There
are in fact compatibility issues with certain applications that arise
because NAT âoetinkersâ with the IP header fields in datagrams
but not in the application data. This means tools like FTP,
which pass IP addresses and port numbers in commands, must be specially
handled, and some applications may not work.
Problems With Security Protocols: Protocols
like IPSec are designed to detect modifications to headers and commonly balk at
the changes that NAT makes, since they cannot differentiate those changes
from malicious datagram âoehackingâ. It is still possible to
combine NAT and IPSec, but this becomes more complicated.
Poor Support for Client Access: The lack
of a public IP address for each client is a double-edged sword; it protects
against hackers trying to access a host but also makes it difficult
for legitimate access to clients on the local network. âoePeer-to-peerâ
applications are harder to set up, and something like an organizational web site (accessed from the Internet as a whole) usually needs to be
set up without NAT.
Performance Reduction: Each time a datagram
transitions between the private network and the Internet, an address
translation is required. In addition, other work must be done as well,
such as recalculating header checksums. Each individual translation
takes little effort but when you add it up, you are giving up some performance.
Furthermore, I believe that GP was not complaining about censorship and/or limit of access by government authorities, but rather using that to preface the technical reason they have one ISP that routes through China.
Ummmmmm. Ever heard of Battle.net? Apparently there is a huge community of online StarCraft, WarCraft, and Diablo series players. StarCraft came out in 1998. According to GameSpy, the original Counter-Strike currently has 33097 servers and 79928 players. Counterstrike 1.0 was release in 2000.
Based on that, I'd say that a good multiplayer game will have online playability for at least 10 years. That is a pretty decent amount of time for hardware to catch up.
I feel the same way. This is the same as certain political entities attempting to tie every crime on the planet to terrorism. The person who posted that is obviously unacquainted with world events. Its rather easy to do a little research and find sites like Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch
As it stands right now, entire sourceforge is being punished because of actions of some idiot who decided to tie his political grievances into a notepad application that has fuckall to do with Tibet.
That is interesting, because I thought it was China that was being punished because they have an overly controlling government that believes in suppressing freedom(apparently as in speech and beer in this case).
If the iPhone is everything you want, then this isn't the phone for you. Guess what, though? Not everybody is just like you, nor ought you expect them to be - that's arrogant and narrow-minded.
If the majority perception in the marketplace is that the product is overpriced, it could have an effect on meeting the bottom line. This is not a F/OSS software product, where distribution of the product is arguably irrelevant. It would be arrogant to think that everybody will have his opinion, but perhaps not so much to think that there is the possibility of enough people having the same opinion that the phone does not succeed on the market. Regardless of how useful and grandiose some people think the phone is, sales will still determine the success of the product.
I find it hard to argue that most transmissions governed by the FCC are for the purpose of commerce between the states, with foreign nations, and Indian tribes, especially those that are radio-based with a range under 20-30 miles.
Well, for one, DRM doesn't work. There have been plenty of discussions about that on Slashdot. You cannot give out the lock and the key together and expect it to not get cracked. For a much more in-depth explanation, you can read this:
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/96
The constitution neither uses the phrase "beg the question", nor does it address a right to privacy. It's a rather straight forward explanation of how the federal government is supposed to function as a framework for state governments. I've never had a hard time reading and understanding it and I think you would be hard pressed to find portions of the constitution that do not make sense in a modern literary context.
I think we should use your reply for every post on Slashdot that mixes up the two, but will need your permission since your comment is trademarked to you.
I highly doubt that the founders intended their document to be interpreted in context. Contrarily, I'm rather certain that they intended it to be read and understood literally. I'm confident that they know that they should write exactly what they meant literally, to avoid people twisting the meaning under the guise of 'historical context'.
Exactly, except that not everyone that would have purchased their products in those 60 minutes will buy elsewhere. They hour they came back online they could make 1.9 x typical USD per minute. That and the fact that this is not really a holiday season of any sort, so sales are likely nowhere near the peak rates they reach around Christmas, New Years, etc...
I'm not sure how that merits skipping a version. If the desired effect is to create separation with the previous junk program, wouldn't it be a better idea to rename it? Or maybe you are trying to say that 1-3 were junk partly because your organization is not too big on logic? Finally, it is possible that you are somehow trying to say you work for Nullsoft without getting in trouble...
While it offers more than Flash does... Like cross-browser and operating system compatibility? Oh yeah, its another vendor lock-in product targeted at web developers. Tell me about it when it can actually be used for the Internet.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe you've never considered the jobs that available that require more than one language for the simple fact that you only speak one. Is it not possible that if you spoke another language you would consider opportunities for work in Europe or Asia? Of course if you're one of those guys that sees Texas as the best thing since sliced bread, I guess my point of view is pointless.
Learn Swiss..........Swedish hot chicks
Layne
I would think Swedish chicks would speak Swedish and Swiss chicks would speak German, French, Italian,or Romansh...
I noticed this recently when they switched away from flash and it suddenly stopped working.
Maybe it has to do with the fact that it's an international competition for athletic dominance.
Oh, how did you turn off the computer restart nag every time an update is run?
Discrimination can also be used to mean a judgement...
You don't have a vote.
I don't have a vote? Really?
All the media outlets in America are pushing the same garbage anyway. Why do you care if they consolidate?
He wouldn't have to upgrade the entire network. That is the point of the GP. He can keep all his old stuff on 802.11g and by an 802.11n access point that plugs into the g router. Voila, everything works.
Furthermore, I believe that GP was not complaining about censorship and/or limit of access by government authorities, but rather using that to preface the technical reason they have one ISP that routes through China.
Ummmmmm. Ever heard of Battle.net? Apparently there is a huge community of online StarCraft, WarCraft, and Diablo series players. StarCraft came out in 1998. According to GameSpy, the original Counter-Strike currently has 33097 servers and 79928 players. Counterstrike 1.0 was release in 2000.
Based on that, I'd say that a good multiplayer game will have online playability for at least 10 years. That is a pretty decent amount of time for hardware to catch up.
I feel the same way. This is the same as certain political entities attempting to tie every crime on the planet to terrorism. The person who posted that is obviously unacquainted with world events. Its rather easy to do a little research and find sites like Amnesty International or Human Rights Watch
As it stands right now, entire sourceforge is being punished because of actions of some idiot who decided to tie his political grievances into a notepad application that has fuckall to do with Tibet.
That is interesting, because I thought it was China that was being punished because they have an overly controlling government that believes in suppressing freedom(apparently as in speech and beer in this case).
If the majority perception in the marketplace is that the product is overpriced, it could have an effect on meeting the bottom line. This is not a F/OSS software product, where distribution of the product is arguably irrelevant. It would be arrogant to think that everybody will have his opinion, but perhaps not so much to think that there is the possibility of enough people having the same opinion that the phone does not succeed on the market. Regardless of how useful and grandiose some people think the phone is, sales will still determine the success of the product.I find it hard to argue that most transmissions governed by the FCC are for the purpose of commerce between the states, with foreign nations, and Indian tribes, especially those that are radio-based with a range under 20-30 miles.
I used Compuserve as an ISP and had a GeoCities page. What great times!
Thank you. You have helped me. Mod parent up!
Well, for one, DRM doesn't work. There have been plenty of discussions about that on Slashdot. You cannot give out the lock and the key together and expect it to not get cracked. For a much more in-depth explanation, you can read this: http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/96
The constitution neither uses the phrase "beg the question", nor does it address a right to privacy. It's a rather straight forward explanation of how the federal government is supposed to function as a framework for state governments. I've never had a hard time reading and understanding it and I think you would be hard pressed to find portions of the constitution that do not make sense in a modern literary context.
I think we should use your reply for every post on Slashdot that mixes up the two, but will need your permission since your comment is trademarked to you.
I highly doubt that the founders intended their document to be interpreted in context. Contrarily, I'm rather certain that they intended it to be read and understood literally. I'm confident that they know that they should write exactly what they meant literally, to avoid people twisting the meaning under the guise of 'historical context'.
People still buy unlocked phones don't they? Last time I checked, some of those suckers have pretty hefty price tags!
Exactly, except that not everyone that would have purchased their products in those 60 minutes will buy elsewhere. They hour they came back online they could make 1.9 x typical USD per minute. That and the fact that this is not really a holiday season of any sort, so sales are likely nowhere near the peak rates they reach around Christmas, New Years, etc...
I'm not sure how that merits skipping a version. If the desired effect is to create separation with the previous junk program, wouldn't it be a better idea to rename it? Or maybe you are trying to say that 1-3 were junk partly because your organization is not too big on logic? Finally, it is possible that you are somehow trying to say you work for Nullsoft without getting in trouble...