Slashdot Mirror


The Future of Subnotebook Pricing

Corpuscavernosa recommends a story from InternetNews about the development of the subnotebook market. The author notes the beginnings of a trend toward selling the devices bundled with certain services rather than as standalone products. He notes two examples; a free Asus Eee PC with a broadband package, and another for opening a bank account. Quoting: "Soon, the market will be overwhelmed by what I like to call 'mini me too' laptops -- commodity Asus clones that will drive margins for all players toward zero. There will be no real money to be made in direct sales of cheap mini-notebooks to consumers. I'm predicting that the successful pricing model for 'mini me too' laptops will look nothing like the notebook pricing model (where you always pay full price for the hardware), and a lot like the cell phone pricing model where you buy a service, and the hardware is heavily subsidized or given away free."

145 comments

  1. Cell Phones by mixmatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People still buy unlocked phones don't they? Last time I checked, some of those suckers have pretty hefty price tags!

    1. Re:Cell Phones by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was my thought too.

      Going the route of the cell phone means there will be few 'unencumbered' laptops floating around and they will all be tied to some service, which will limit what you can and cant do with them.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:Cell Phones by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Most places sell unlocked phones with a contract, or with a prepaid credit. Or you can spend a few bucks/euros/pounds and get it unlocked at any of the places that offer it. Since the trend towards selling subsidized unlocked phones, the demand for unsubsidized unlocked phones has diminished greatly.

    3. Re:Cell Phones by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "People still buy unlocked phones don't they? Last time I checked, some of those suckers have pretty hefty price tags!"

      Not in the US they don't...most people in the US have no idea what a 'locked' phone means. They just accept it as normal that you sign up for 1-2 years, and each time you do that...you get a free, or cheap (price wise) phone.

      If you tried to sell my US citizens a unsubsidized phone at what they really cost....they'd be flabbergasted...and then ask why the hell you'd want to do that?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Cell Phones by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      If you offered them cell service for half the price with that more expensive phone I *HIGHLY* doubt they'd balk. Especially when they figured out they could buy a used phone off of ebay and still use that cheap(er) service.

    5. Re:Cell Phones by harry666t · · Score: 1

      What if Linux or some other significant FOSS project that is essential for a complete handheld system embraces GPLv3? GNU/Linux seems to be the best choice for these subnotebooks, I think XP isn't an option for their underpowered hardware.

    6. Re:Cell Phones by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that cellphone service seems to be cheaper in the US than it is most places in spite of the contracts which supposedly subsidize a phone which is supposedly worth five hundred bucks.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Cell Phones by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I agree XP isn't good for the low end resource, but there are other embedded OS's that we might get stuck with.

      Symbios, WinCE, PalmOS, etc

      ANd i still bet they lock it down so you cant do anything with it, much as with phones.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    8. Re:Cell Phones by shellbeach · · Score: 1

      People still buy unlocked phones don't they? Last time I checked, some of those suckers have pretty hefty price tags! They do ... but most often it's because phones and toilets don't mix too well (who knew?)

      It's only the really geeky who will buy a new phone just because it's got a built in GPS or a scroll-wheel ...

  2. like cell phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    and like cell phones, americans will all be tight arses and opt only for the free/subsidized notebooks, and yet wonder why their notebooks seem to be intentionally crippled, while europeans buy theirs outright and have everything work as it should

    1. Re:like cell phones... by TyrainDreams · · Score: 0

      and like cell phones, americans will all be tight arses and opt only for the free/subsidized notebooks, and yet wonder why their notebooks seem to be intentionally crippled, while europeans buy theirs outright and have everything work as it should You have obviously never been to America or don't know any American's. Even people who get their teenagers phones get them those stupid QWERTY keyboard phones. If you get something free you know there is a reason why.
    2. Re:like cell phones... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure where in Europe you've been to but most people I know get their phone on a contract (hence the reason they complained about being able to unlock their phone after the contract) and the only people that buy phones are PAYG customers who buy cheap old models or people buying a cheap old model phone for their kid.

      From my experience the biggest difference is in Europe you get decent phones for free on a contract where as it's more common to pay something for the phone *and* have a contract in the US.

    3. Re:like cell phones... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      From my experience the biggest difference is in Europe you get decent phones with the price hidden in your monthly subscription on a contract
      Fixed that for you.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:like cell phones... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Well duh but can you pay $250.00 for a Motorola MOTORAZRÂ V9m and having to take on a $40 p.m. 2 year contract in the US.

      In the UK it's free on a £20 per month 18 month contract.

      £20 is roughly $40 USD so you could say that per month it's the same cost except the US contract is 6 months longer and you paid $250.00 for the phone.

      That's with a quick browse. I'm sure I could find someone offering half price line rental for x amount of months too. I think I did quite well when I got my HTC based Orange M3100 for free on a £25 per month contract when most people were having to pay like £50 or more on £40 per month or higher contracts. I got really lucky on that other than getting stuck with Orange and their shitty customer service. I think we just have more competition so they'll give better deals, imo.

      I haven't bought a phone for awhile in the US so I'm not sure if they buy out contracts over there but if you were tired of the phone before your 18 months were up there is a fair chance you could switch early and the new provider will buy your remaining months on the old contract or you can stay on the same provider and get a free upgrade phone which probably will extend your contract but if you intended on staying with them that's a small price to pay for getting a second new phone.

    5. Re:like cell phones... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      In the UK it's free on a £20 per month 18 month contract.
      So it's free except for the fact that you pay for it. Given the punctuation - or lack of it - in your final paragraph perhaps you shouldn't use 'duh' so much - it's not entirely obvious that you're trying to be ironic.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:like cell phones... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      The I-Appliance BBS is full of the orphaned products of companies who believed that applies to computers:

      http://www.linux-hacker.net/cgi-bin/UltraBoard/UltraBoard.pl

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:like cell phones... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Paying something for the phone doesn't mean paying more for the phone is ok. The Razr 2 sim free is £170 on Play.com. £20 per month x 18 months is £360. After subtracting the cost of the phone that would work out to be a £10 per month contract. Sim-only contracts start at £15 per month.

      So yes while you technically pay for the phone it is effectively free especially when compared to the States where you pay for the phone up front and in the contract and, in the particular deal I looked at, you get less minutes and text messages.

    8. Re:like cell phones... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yes, but, in the EU, don't you generally pay more for the voice time you use than in the US? Many plans over here have tons of minutes, some that roll over each month....FREE long distance to anywhere in the US (most of us have no reason to call outside the US very often)...and with many plans, from 7pm - 6am...it is free and unlimited calling, same with weekends.

      I thought I heard that the reason SMS texting became so popular over there, was the it was much more pricey to use the voice part of the phone, which after all, IS still the primary function of a phone, no?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:like cell phones... by jshackney · · Score: 1

      I don't think we're talking apples and apples here.

      I paid $95 for a MotoRAZR V3xx a few years ago when it was new. Yeah, it came with a 24 mo. contract. My wife got a new phone (Nokia), but not the latest and greatest, at the same time for $50. We both had rebates and hers basically worked to be free. We're on the same contract. We share minutes and never pay usage charges for overage (unless I'm out of the country--my employer reimburses those calls thankfully!) My bill is steady at $70 a month, and I have more rollover minutes than I know what to do with. Oh yeah, many cell providers (in the U.S. at least) will give discounts to government employees and credit union members. Sometimes the savings can cover the cost of the next better plan.

      The one thing I'd like to see, however, is my monthly rate go down when my term elapses and I go month-to-month. But I doubt that will ever happen.

    10. Re:like cell phones... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      But also: in EU phones are "unlocked" (I'm not talking about simlock that allows usage only with originating telecom, I'm talking about actually beeing able to install your own apps or beeing able to communicate with the phone via USB/transfer music/pictures that way, etc.)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:like cell phones... by tepples · · Score: 1

      So it's free except for the fact that you pay for it. thetoadwarrior's point is that there is far less up-front charge for featureful phones in Europe than in the United States.
    12. Re:like cell phones... by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      I'm in the US, and I recently got a Nokia 6300 (had a Razr v3 before that which crapped out on me - no big shock there) and it isn't crippled in any way. I can do whatever I want with the phone without violating any agreements or having to "unlock" the phone. That includes java app installation and removal, transferring files via USB, using my phone as an MP3 player (which seems pointless to me), and , Of course, I'm not with Verizon, Cingular, AT&T, or Alltel. Instead, I'm with a smaller regional provider, so this obviously won't apply to everybody.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
    13. Re:like cell phones... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Many plans in the EU have tons of free minutes and I have never heard of one that did not roll over unused minutes. I think that the US is the only place that charges for incoming calls. But yes, most Europeans have lots of reason to call abroad.

      SMS became a craze for school kids who are on a very low budget and use their dads old phone on PAYG. It normally costs them about $20 to get their dads last years phone unlocked or they can use it on the same network with PAYG. It is only locked to a network, not to a user.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    14. Re:like cell phones... by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I'm in the US and have a PPC6700 (HTC Apache) from Sprint. I can use Bluetooth dial up networking to tether, share files with USB, wi-fi or bluetooth between my PC and the phone, I can use my own mp3's as ring tones, add and remove any app at will, etc. What feature am I missing out on here that I would be getting in the EU? I really am curious.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    15. Re:like cell phones... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You must be better at mindreading than I am, because that isn't what he said. He keeps insisting that the phone is free.

      It's the same logic as the people who don't look at whether they can afford something, but just look at the monthly payments.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:like cell phones... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "SMS became a craze for school kids who are on a very low budget and use their dads old phone on PAYG. It normally costs them about $20 to get their dads last years phone unlocked or they can use it on the same network with PAYG."

      What is PAYG?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:like cell phones... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      None, but from what many of slashdotters tell here that's not exactly a rule in US, right?

      It definatelly is in EU - I haven't encountered any phones sold by telecoms that would differ from models sold by manufacturers more than sim-lock/wallpaper/logo/startup animation.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    18. Re:like cell phones... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      So your are exception to the rule?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    19. Re:like cell phones... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      As I recall the US only recently caught up with the rest of the world in regards to unlocking phones and what not. Though I do wonder how much it's changed because it seems weird that Sony Ericsson doesn't want to sell phones in the US or has avoided selling in the US until recently.

  3. Calculator Redux? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've read that in the 70s, 4-function calculators went from high-margin, luxury items to throw-away promotional items. The only calculators I've bought are a financial calculator, and a scientific calculator for basic statistics; all of my other calculators are freebies. It took a bit longer, perhaps as the product is far more complex, but are we seeing the same ultra-commoditization of mobile computing devices?

    --
    Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    1. Re:Calculator Redux? by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Short answer: I would agree with you that we are.

      Long answer:

      The article is completely off with its "There will be no real money to be made in direct sales of cheap mini-notebooks to consumers. " statement. Tell that to every business who has taken a smaller per-item profit to dynamically increase revenue via volume.

      It's the truth of all business and a continually evolving economy and the technology underlying: building something expensive, make it cheaper, sell tons, build something better to replace it.

      Once this occurs and computers/laptops/asus eee equivalents get to be in the range of "absolutely anyone can afford one for a decent one", everyone will have one just like how everyone can afford a cellphone nowadays.

    2. Re:Calculator Redux? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem with this analogy is that you only need x amount of processor power to run a calculator. Im sure I could get a free laptop that ran Windows 95 fairly quickly but couldnt run Vista at all. Laptops are forever a moving target. The scales of economy keep up, but not to the point where they will be commodity give-aways at conventions.

      If someone really wanted to build something that ran, say Puppy Linux, fairly well with a small screen then it seems pretty doable if someone was willing to gamble to put such a thing in mass production. The amount of people who want or need a portable Puppy Linux machine probably isnt very high.

      The OLPC people are also banking on this, but with the assumption that the demands of the market are not important when dealing with socialized top-down educational programs. Although lately the education administrators from the countries they market their product to are demanding XP thus killing the "we can sell a low-powered machine with a custom OS" assumption.

    3. Re:Calculator Redux? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that sub-notebooks aren't designed to be as general purpose as full notebooks, and are closer to information appliances than full-blown computers, at least as far as intended goes, so the Windows compatibility concern becomes much less severe. The only real concern would be getting whatever is on the sub-notebook to be modifiable on a Windows machine, which should be a default feature.

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    4. Re:Calculator Redux? by oakgrove · · Score: 1

      I don't know what your problem with Puppy Linux is but it isn't much different than Xandros on the Eee. They both use a 2.6 kernel and they both use a lightweight window manager (IceWM for Xandros and JWM for Puppy). They can both run the same programs in the same way. It's more like the difference between Win2000 and XP not 95 and XP if you insist on dragging Windows into this. You must not know very much about Linux.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    5. Re:Calculator Redux? by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      See, what's happened here is that a machine with a 630MHz processor - the height of excellence in 1999 - is enough to not only sell but to become a huge hit. I see no reason Linux won't continue to work just fine (modulo sufficient memory) even as Moore's Law continues at the top end.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  4. Calculators by grizdog · · Score: 0, Redundant
    We've seen this before, haven't we? here are many examples, but calculators went from being high-margin, high tech items that were very expensive. It wasn't long before they became commodity items that earned razor thin margins for a few low cost producers, and then a high-end developed for calculators that looked a little like computers.


    Companies that can get a really good manufacturing and distribution process in place will make a lot of these things, others will wash out, and others may follow the model described in the article.

  5. I'm not sure the author understands economics by saterdaies · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In any truly competitive market (like the market for bulk, wholesale USDA Grade A Wheat where there is no product differentiation and lots of buyers and lots of sellers), sellers make zero economic profit. Economic profit is the profit above the profit you could make in another industry - so, if you build a computer business with 100,000 and get a 20,000 profit and that 100,000 would only have gotten you a 5,000 profit in the pizza business, that 15,000 difference is the economic profit).

    Over the long-term, companies don't play in markets that don't have zero economic profit or better - because they have better options to put their time and money into.

    Now, these mini notebooks aren't going to be a truly competitive market because, like standard laptops, there is significant product differentiation. People do have a certain amount of brand loyalty, they want different features (20GB vs 16GB, Windows vs GNU/Linux, screen size, subjective thoughts about aesthetics and the like). This is very similar to the laptops most people use today - they're vastly the same, but have little tweaks to them that cause consumers to favor one over another.

    If these mini notebooks achieve the same level of product differentiation as current laptops, margins should be similar. In fact, if the mini notebooks are sold with service, that offers the chance for more differentiation. I mean, when people buy mobile phones, they usually choose their carrier first (usually). That means that the margins for the device can be higher because the different service is adding another level of differentiation.

    1. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by jonaskoelker · · Score: 0

      They mostly choose their carrier first. Mostly. Fixed ;)
    2. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      In fact, if the mini notebooks are sold with service, that offers the chance for more differentiation.
      It sounds to me like you're completely in agreement with the claims in the article. There is differentiation in subnotebooks if they're sold with other products or services. He compares with cell phones, which have differentiation because they're sold with other products or services. Cell phone hardware is basically free, but cell phone service is expensive. He's predicting the same thing with subnotebooks.

    3. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, but the mods here are wowed by half-forgotten arguments from freshman economics class, even if they are largely irrelevant.

      BTW vendors that have established strong brand names, including HP, Sony, Lenovo, Dell, and Gateway, have a strong point of differentiation from the "no-name" vendors and so are arguably not playing in a commodity market. The brand-name vendors are in a "several vendors" market, which should allow at least some of them to make profits above the money market rate of return, assuming they are well-managed.

    4. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People always pay the price or pay more to get what they want. Size matters when it comes to subnotebooks but only if it is functional. So far the keyboards have been inadequate. Most of us would buy an old TRS-100 type subnotebook because it had a minimum adquate screen and perfect keyboard with a good battery option - if it ran a good Linix version. As good as the Asus eee is, in North America it only supports Chinese and English languages and the keyboard is not adquate for typing beyond hunt and peck. The toughest part for any consumers is the wait. We have got the money or we can get the money, but we just can't get the product we want - yet. Perfection for most is perfect keyboard, 6 hr battery, wifi, multilingual open linux, and size in order of importance - price being last. Being close is not good enough because almost everyone has one or more inperfect laptops with lots of memory and speed and are waiting....

    5. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Remeber the Toshiba Libretto? Those (there was a 2nd generation one) were cool. Sadly not cheap.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:I'm not sure the author understands economics by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      4 gigs? $20 buck flash will cover that, for 120-200 GB external HDD enclosures with firewire are perfect, also what runs linux (with x86 CPU), almost always runs windows and francly, ive always wondered is it that to make a laptop with changeable panels - instantly modable -sot to say, like some cell phones i think btw, flexible screens (LCD also) i think are quite usable and afordable, and ive heard of some sort of aluminium foil lamp that ought to serve great as a baclight. since the screen is cheap and foldable, everybody will have something highly portable with a big screen ill step away from the acid blotter now ;)

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
  6. Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I dont think so. Cell phones have something on computers: they have a service that can go away if you dont pay the monthly fee.

    Computers one buys from a store does not. Microsoft and a few other companies have played around with "software as a service", but the smart ones snubbed it. Instead, it'll stay Linux and get cheaper and cheaper.

    --
    1. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by KokorHekkus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just grabbed one of the many junkmail papers i find in my IRL mailbox here in Sweden: If you sign up for a 24 month plan on mobile 3G broadband (at $70 a month) you get a Toshiba 15" laptop with 3 GB memory, Athlon X2 and 250 GB hd for $170. For some people that kind of offer makes sense, for others not. But this is just one of several offers that I find in my mail every month. And you bet the buyers will pay the monthly fee, one way or another. Just like with cellphones.

    2. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      But honestly, what place doesn't have some unsecured Wi-Fi connection to connect to? In your office you usually have a 'Net connection, in the car, it would be very scary to be driving down a highway and see someone with an EEE trying to connect to an open Wi-Fi network while driving, at most restaurants you can manage to get a decent Wi-Fi connection from other restaurants or the restaurants has Wi-Fi too. About the only way that 3Gs is going to convince the average person who needs it (which are usually in the city where most unsecured Wi-Fi connections are....) is if they are commuting by train or something.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Computers one buys from a store does not. Microsoft and a few other companies have played around with "software as a service", but the smart ones snubbed it. Instead, it'll stay Linux and get cheaper and cheaper.

      You are talking the demise of Microsoft, but you know that and I concur. The operating system is now a commodity, and already we see 2 tiers breaking out. EeePC and similar appliance PC on the low end, and Apple at the top end. The question is how fast will this deteriorate the current Microsoft pricing models. I suspect the next quarter financial for MSFT are going to show the trend and it will continue to deteriorate for years.

    4. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      You would get it with a 3G modem which meant to be used with the laptop. Once you quit paying for it you don't get the internet service but the laptop still functions. Just as I can quit paying for my phone but the phone still does it's other bits and in fact I can take it elsewhere for phone service.

    5. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by Cerebus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Consider a mini notebook with only 3G or WiMax. Now you're tethered to the service.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    6. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by KokorHekkus · · Score: 3, Informative

      As I said, it's not for everyone but just using "average person" isn't good enough. Potential users are those who live outside cities where broadband isn't available but 3G is (not extremly uncommon here), people who live in more than one place (weekend commuters, people with summer cottages... there's one summer cottage for every two households in Sweden) and it's also useful for people who travel in work so they don't need to hassle their customers for net access or search for wifi.

      And then we have the people who feel they want to be able to be online anywhere and everywhere. They don't need it but they want it and think it's worth paying something for.

      They're not anywhere near a majority. But it all adds up to a sizeable market anyway.

    7. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree. 3G networking is probably the most flexible way to have an internet connection - everywhere - without relying on unsecure wifis (which probably would be hard to find 30km out in the forrest, i one would ever find him/herself there).

    8. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      3G doesn't need to "convince" anyone, it's just the first step towards "internet everywhere".
      Imagine just opening your device anywhere and "being on" without further research into free Wi-Fi or hotspots. That's where we are heading, internet is becoming a commodity like radio or TV. 3G is most certainly not the end of the story but an important step towards bringing the infrastructure into place and providing gapless service, at least in urban areas, for a start.

      Landlines at home will eventually die out just like phyiscal phone lines are dying out today. Offices, bigger institutions and power users will still have them but joe average will just use the "air service", paid through a flat fee to his provider of choice.

      Consequently I can very well imagine providers starting to subsidize laptops and PCs just like they do with cell phones today. Most people really don't care about hardware specs, they just want to buy (or rent) "a computer" or "a laptop" to use google, e-mail and ebay and maybe write the occassional letter. Even today hardware has already become so advanced that the deciding factor for buying a computer is not CPU speed, RAM size or other performance metrics anymore. The deciding factors are screen size, "style" (see Apple) and battery lifetime. Now compare that to any contract-phone advertisement that you have seen recently? The similarities are not a coincidence.

    9. Re:Subnotebooks like Cell phone plans? by typicallyterrific · · Score: 1

      A couple years ago, if you opened a new savings account with my bank, they'd give you an iPod nano.

      Now it's an eee. We're quickly getting there. As the technology gets better and cheaper, ubiquitous computing seems just around the corner, 100% penetration (tho we're pretty close to that, too).

  7. My ass by Adambomb · · Score: 1

    Somehow i do not see the cellphone subsidy model working in this case. Laptops are one of the most frequently "lost" or stolen items i know of. If such devices are coming subsidized, you can bet your ass that there will be a hefty contract along with it as well as limitations on what you can do with it.

    I mean, who wants the liability of having to continue to meet your contractual obligations for near the cost of the device, in exchange for having to use it their way.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
  8. Stupid argument. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The comparison to cell phones is rather poor. A cell phone is almost totally worthless without the service attached to it (and vice versa). The implication is the two are linked together, where the provider benefits by reducing a high barrier to entry (initial high cost).

    A portable computer is tied to no such service. It's useful without any internet service in particular, and there's thousands of FREE places around the world to get free Wi-Fi internet. So tell me again why this bundled business model is going to take over?

    If you want to make a comparison, compare it to banks giving away free junk, like a toaster. Hardly anyone that wants a toaster goes to open up the bank account just to get the toaster. I don't see why the ultra-mobile laptop is any different.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Stupid argument. by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amazon's Kindle is basically exactly the opposite of the argument being made in the article. The service is rolled into the purchase price of the device.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Stupid argument. by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      A portable computer is tied to no such service.
      Yet. If computers are sold like cellphones, it will be only because there will be some service (like internet access, it's already happening in Europe, see posts above).
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    3. Re:Stupid argument. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A portable computer is tied to no such service.

      They will be. Honestly, how long do you think the open nature of personal computers is going to last? There are huge players with serious economic interests in restricting the devices to a forced subscription model. You won't be able to connect to the internet with it except through their services. You won't be able to just install and run whatever you want.

      There are pressures from multiple directions aiming to do that. Just wait.

    4. Re:Stupid argument. by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's not really free.

      You can get 3G internet for £15/month if you take the modem on its own. Taking the "free" laptop alongwith it pushes the cost up to £35/month, and you are tied into a two year contract. In other words, the "free" laptop costs £240. You can get it for £220 elsewhere.

    5. Re:Stupid argument. by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Honestly, how long do you think the open nature of personal computers is going to last?

      Forever. How long do you think the open nature of lumber is going to continue?

      The only reason personal computers have become as popular as the are is because of the open nature of them. Take that away, and the gravy train is over. Honestly, any market moves towards being MORE open and less proprietary as time goes on. 30 years ago you couldn't buy a non-AT&T approved phone and attach it to your phone line. People got tired of that, and AT&T eventually lost that battle. Do you think we'd ever go back to that kind of policy?

      People have already tried those lock-in models with computers and internet. They didn't work. They're even less likely to work as computers become less and less expensive. 20 years ago lots of network providers tried to close off computer networks into proprietary ones (Compuserve, Q-Link, Prodigy, AOL). Those all failed to an open model. Trying to create a proprietary solution when an open one already exists is going to be near impossible.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Stupid argument. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The only reason personal computers have become as popular as the are is because of the open nature of them.

      (I'm the AC you replied to).

      Well, I certainly *hope* you're right, but I *fear* you're not. I mean, look at the rising popularity of locked down platforms like playstations and 360's, or cell phones. Most people don't really seem to care whether the platform is open.

      20 years ago this couldn't work with computers or the internet because most people using them were technically literate and wouldn't stand for it. But increasingly it's Joe Sixpack who doesn't know or care. He shops on price, and if he can get $100 off the price of that new computer by buy some locked down piece of crap with HW that only works with some particular service provider, he'll do it. He bought winmodems, for pete sake.

      I think it's only a matter of time. Eventually you won't even be able to get on the net without running a "trusted platform".

    7. Re:Stupid argument. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to make a comparison, compare it to banks giving away free junk, like a toaster. Hardly anyone that wants a toaster goes to open up the bank account just to get the toaster. I don't see why the ultra-mobile laptop is any different. I wouldn't go as far as to say hardly anyone. Just check out the some of the freebies websites.
    8. Re:Stupid argument. by Stephen+Ma · · Score: 1

      Now would be a good time for the federal government to lay down fiber to everyone's homes. (The cost? A few months in Iraq.)

      The government would own the fiber, but private entities would provide the actual Internet services. The split would prevent the government from doing nasty things, and equally forstall the kind of lock-down by large corporations that you predict.

  9. Schools by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

    I can see this model becoming used in schools where the schools bribe students with a laptop to do well on standardized tests. Or perhaps giving every student a laptop and free wi-fi access at the schools, however if your GPA slips below something your MAC address gets banned until it starts going back up.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  10. AMD geode by goombah99 · · Score: 1, Troll

    If this is such a great hypothesis then why did things like the AMD geode or the recent (forgetting the name) $20/month balck box computer catch fire?

    was the time just not right?

    Also if you look at these mini PCs it seems like their are teirs on these. Some are low cost low power, some are higher cost higher power. when people talk about these on slashdot the conversation goes like this:

    nerd 1: oooh the XO is only $100 or $200 dollars.

    nerd 2: yeah but it's a dog. I could get an fluvio flivitron for only $100 more and it has a real graphics card.

    etc...

    so no one on slashdot is really interested in the low end machine other than to talk about it's price. (Except of course when the price-tards are trying to put down macs by claiming this or that POS is "the same" but costs less)

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:AMD geode by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      so no one on slashdot is really interested in the low end machine other than to talk about it's price

      And it is the only way you can get a device with a decent OS (Linux) in a typical large store. Most of us don't like/hate/will return Vista so it makes since to support an OS we all like by getting a subnotebook as about the only other way you can get Linux pre-installed is go to a specialty computer store or online.
      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:AMD geode by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1, Interesting

      (..) then why did things like the AMD geode or the recent (forgetting the name) $20/month balck box computer catch fire? Got more info on that? In the case of the AMD Geode, I think you're mistaken. I've got one of these (Geode NX1750) lying around somewhere, and it's one of the coolest running chips you can find in a desktop (more likely found in industrial board, media player/set-top boxes or similar). Performs like an Athlon XP1600+, uses 25W tops (around 14W average). If you manage to overheat that, perhaps it'll smoke a bit, maybe crack, but not burn. CPU sockets surely use some flame-retardant material, and a metal CPU cooler doesn't help either to start a fire.

      Me thinks you're talking about some machine with a Geode *in it* (maybe powersupply burnout), or perhaps a laptop battery catching fire?
    3. Re:AMD geode by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      so no one on slashdot is really interested in the low end machine other than to talk about it's price

      Sure we are. We're just not the ones saying how much better more expensive machines are.

    4. Re:AMD geode by Zemran · · Score: 1

      or - Sure we are, do you think I would take my girlfriend into the Apple Store ?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    5. Re:AMD geode by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      No girlfriend, and my wife is as disinterested in Apple products as I am. :)

  11. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No one goes there any more. It's too crowded." --Yogi Berra

  12. Why there are no economist billionaires. by Hankapobe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...sellers make zero economic profit. Economic profit is the profit above the profit you could make in another industry - so, if you build a computer business with 100,000 and get a 20,000 profit and that 100,000 would only have gotten you a 5,000 profit in the pizza business, that 15,000 difference is the economic profit).

    This is why I wanted to slap my econ teacher in B-school around.

    There are no billionaire economists - but they know it all, don't they? And yet, an uneducated man from Arkansas became one on the richest men in the World from making zero economic profit: Sam Walton founder of Walmart.

    1. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's because economists like to call their field a science, when in fact it is only a science if you consider fortune telling a science. Economics is bullshit. Otherwise, we wouldn't have to switch between dominant economic theories every few decades when something bad happens that the previous theory failed to take into account. For instance, where is stagflation mentioned in any economic theory prior to 1975? Oh right, it was considered impossible.

    2. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by blueadept1 · · Score: 1

      I suppose that it is the same as being a doctor then, eh? Pure fortune telling. "Oh, this guy is obviously crazy. Let's drill a hole in his head!"

    3. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Contrary to popular belief, Sam Walton (the founder of Wal-Mart) was not from Arkansas. He was actually born in Kingfisher, Oklahoma on March 29, 1918. He was raised in Missouri where he worked in his father's store while attending school. He also was a college graduate (University of Missouri in 1940).

    4. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by SunTzuWarmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are correct. Economics not a science because it is not correct all of the time. Real sceinces like physics (black holes, wormholes, ultra-small interactions, anti-matter), chemistry (bonding theory, atomic model), biology (the issue of the appendix, 'natural' supplements, numerous other things they have been wrong about), microbiology (advancement of certain fungi, spread of disease, availability of microbiologies in harsh environments), and geoscience (plate tectonics, changing weather patterns, ice ages, global warming) are correct 100% of the time and do not change their theories.

      Do you honestly believe that because we switch dominant economic theories every "few decades" that it is less of a science? I mean, we flip-flop on issues like anti-matter every few years for physics.

      Of course, I'm replying to an anonymous coward, so I get no mod points and no one ever reads my refutation. *Sigh*

    5. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by tbradshaw · · Score: 1

      This is because in your economics class, you might have slept through the part where "economic profit" and "monetary profit" were defined and differentiated.

      Normal profit, of the cash-money variety, is *subtracted as a cost* when calculating economic profit. Sam Walton had zero economic profit because in his very competitive market *after subtracting monetary profit*, he was (approximately) break even. This is a measure of economic systems in a more holistic view, rather than a "money in the bank view".

      So yes, Sam Walton had a negligible economic profit while (at the same time) making a fortune in monetary profit.

      (Also, financial speculators are economists... and they are often the majority of Forbes "Richest" lists.)

    6. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by wilder_card · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WRONG^H^H^H^H^H Permit me to respectfully disagree. Walton did two things with Wal-Mart: He differentiated his product with superior selection and service at reduced prices, and he developed a more efficient enterprise. By the way, IT was critical to doing both at the same time.

      Now that's classic economic theory. The reason an economist didn't do it? Translating theory into practice is a whole 'nother ball game.

    7. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are no billionaire economists - but they know it all, don't they?

      Most of the big billionare money (the new money, not the stuff you inherit, at least) is in organizing people to actually get stuff done, making big deals with other companies (and, for that matter, convincing people to put you in charge and pay you money if you're not there already). Anyone can learn how business works. It's another thing to actually pull it off. That's people-skills.

      I'm sure there's nerds who could tell you all about, oh, say, the physics of football, the biological processes that occur, the strategy, the statistics. That doesn't mean they could survive a tackle.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    8. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Hankapobe · · Score: 1
      Also, financial speculators are economists... and they are often the majority of Forbes "Richest" lists.

      Name one.

    9. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NYU economic theorist, Thomas Sargent, lives on the 19th floor of a 5 star hotel and makes over $300,000 a year. He's not exactly eating Mac N' Cheese though most people that think Walmart is something special probably are.

    10. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      Ok... I'll name him Bob Jones. He's probably already got a name though (not that I know what it is), and Bob Jones isn't a particularly good name (although the best I could come up with on the spur of the moment), but since you insist... I just hope I don't have to be the one to tell his mother, that's all I'm saying.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    11. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by klingens · · Score: 1

      Medicine is not a science either. It tries to be through research, but at this stage it's an advanced version of already tried stuff which has been tested to various degrees.
      "With patients with symptoms X Y and Z, procedure A helped first in animal trials and then in specified-percentage of humans. Now do the same to him, it might work even when he also gets undesirable result B with a chance of foo%"

      Procedure being anything from a medication to operation.

    12. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Economics not a science because it is not correct all of the time. No, economics is not a "hard" science because, like psychology, its theories are based on unquantifiable parameters.

      For example:

      if you build a computer business with 100,000 and get a 20,000 profit and that 100,000 would only have gotten you a 5,000 profit in the pizza business, that 15,000 difference is the economic profit "would only have gotten you a 5,000 profit" looks suspiciously like a number, but in reality, it's made up. It's an astrological prediction based on guesswork and extrapolation.

      In a real science, when your prediction is different than the outcome, you have to fix your theory. In economics, when your prediction is different than the outcome, you can probably just revise your parameters, post hoc, and save the theory.
    13. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      "would only have gotten you a 5,000 profit" looks suspiciously like a number, but in reality, it's made up.
      Not necessarily. You could look at a pizza business (or several) and see how much they made. Just because it's not meausrabe to the fifth decimal place doesn't mean it's made up.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There are no billionaire economists - but they know it all, don't they? And yet, an uneducated man from Arkansas became one on the richest men in the World from making zero economic profit: Sam Walton founder of Walmart.
      Physicists know it all too, yet it's poorly educated jocks that make millions hitting a baseball. What you point out is the difference between creating a model, and actually doing things.
      As for Wal-mart, they are close to 0 economic profit, given they have a net margin of 3.3% while Federal bonds are ~3%
    15. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, when I look around at Pizza businesses I see everything from moderate success to bankruptcy. And that's in just one small neighborhood.

      So without knowing the factors that determine success in the Pizza business, I can't guess whether he has those factors. Perhaps he would have done much worse in the Pizza business.

      I wouldn't claim that economics isn't a science. I don't know enough about it. But popular economics isn't a science, and neither is politically motivated economics.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by tbradshaw · · Score: 2, Informative

      George Soros

    17. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economics not a science because it is not correct all of the time.

      Interesting. Using those grounds, medicine isn't a science, nor meteorology. Thanks for clearing that up :-).

    18. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, while I agree that saying that physics is 100% right all the time is nonsense, so is your example. I'm not aware of any "flip-flopping" on antimatter in physics ever, aside from the initial progression from conjectural idea to actual observation. Once Carl Anderson saw positrons in cosmic rays (1932), and then we started making them in the lab, I don't think there was any argument after that. What are you talking about here?

    19. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      I mean, we flip-flop on issues like anti-matter every few years for physics.
      Uh, no, we don't. Yes, I am a physicist.

      It sounds like you don't understand the correspondence principle.

    20. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Most of the big billionare money (the new money, not the stuff you inherit, at least) is in organizing people to actually get stuff done, making big deals with other companies (and, for that matter, convincing people to put you in charge and pay you money if you're not there already). Anyone can learn how business works. It's another thing to actually pull it off. That's people-skills. Part vision (where are we going), part people skills (get everyone on board, not necessarily the cuddly ones), part business smarts (who do we partner with), part negotiation skills (Jobs convinced the big 5 about iTMS for example), part charisma (yes, really), part recruitment (get the right people) and a bunch of other skills.

      One thing is usually absent though, any form of detail skills. At the very, very top it's not about being one smart person, it's about herding a bunch of smart people and hiring others that are great at herding smart people. I know I'm smart, but I also realize time flies and that I'm only one man and the day has only 24 hours. No matter if I worked triple shifts working myself to death could I ever make something like GTA4 alone. If I was in a dysfunctional organization, it wouldn't really matter how bright I was and we'd still not get it done.

      The other way around is a little better, if you have a big organization chances are you'll have a mix of smart, average and dumb people. It's almopst so bad that you pick the smart to design it, the average build it and you try to prevent the dumb from fucking everything up. Bad code in a good design can be replaced, but It doesn't matter if you have great code in a shitty design that'll never make it into production. I'd almost go so far as to say that the reason that management get paid so well is that it's their responsibility to not fuck up everyone downstream. Clearly that responsibility becomes larger the nearer the top you are.
      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    21. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      In the natural sciences, one tries to develop theories that have the power to describe the underlying principles of a naturally occurring phenomenon, with the goal to use these theories as predictive tools. When a theory fails to predict certain phenomena, it needs tweaking or a paradigm shift, until both its describing and predicting value are in correspondence with the natural state of things.

      Say, this is where Intelligent Design fails as a scientific theory. Even though you could use it as a tool to describe underlying principles, its predictive value is 0.

      For economic theories, you have the problem that the phenomena that occur are not "natural". You can most likely influence the course of an economy by publishing new theories. Try influencing the speed of light just by convincing the light that its fundamental theory is different than before.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    22. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by azgard · · Score: 1

      So what are you doing in fact, you use a different measurement for success in the real world (money) and in the world described by economics (economic profit). Then you model behavior of people based on those different definitions.

      That's truly a correct way to describe the system!

    23. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by cgenman · · Score: 1

      if your science is correct 100% of the time and unchanging, you're doing it wrong.

    24. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by tbradshaw · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Wrong again.

      The success in the real world (money) is used to model the behavior of people. The success of the system as a whole is measured (among other things) in economic profit. Then those that manipulate the economy examine the difference and try to move the incentives for individuals such that the goals align.

      To be full disclosure, I'm not in that category of economist. There's a bunch of bullshit in economics, mountains of it, but it's not in the fundamentals that you learned in your coursework. Terms like economic profit are very useful, they just have a confusing name (at least until you're familiar with the modeling used).

      The core problem with economics as a field of study is the entrenchment it has with politics. Often, the most correct theory/model is tossed aside because it's not politically expedient. After/during the great depression, the government was looking for an explanation for why the economy "broke" and what they could do to "fix it". Keynesian economics is the result. Generally speaking, economics is *powerful*, because world leaders want information to help them meddle with the markets of their respective countries. But also because of this bias, economic models that conclude with "stop messing with things" rarely get professionally respected.

      Also, it's painful to come from a rigorous scientific discipline and then study economics. It's so obvious when theorems and formulas are intentionally muddied with greek letters and unnecessary exposition. ("Pi is inflation? Pi is a number... like a real number... why would you use that for inflation?") They also have a long standing professional/academic understanding that empirical modeling is definitive. Ala: if you have a model that you make up while showering one morning, and it accurately explains a portion of data, then it is *valid*. Nevermind that it includes variables for sunspot generation and number of paint chips eaten in New Jersey during the previous month (recursive), if it appears to work it is valid! (Then they wonder why the forecasts don't work for all cases)

      So, don't think that I'm not "with you" in thinking that economist are often full of shit. But it's not the fundamentals that you learned in early econ classes that are messed up (especially just because you confused two complete different terms that end in "profit"). And many people are very influential and very very rich from their use of current economic theory.

      Economics is a very real field and there are a lot of economists that do real work with genuine scientific rigor. It just happens to be in the same pile with a bunch of politically loaded dog shit.

    25. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by Locklin · · Score: 1

      chances are it's interpolation, not extrapolation, because the model is probably based on data from businesses turning a range of profit including the rather modest $5000 profit. Additionally, this posterior estimate would be considered a maximum likelihood or the mode of a probability distribution, such that making estimates on the model will eventually work out when you invest in many businesses.

      There are many (grey) demarcation criteria for indicating what is a science and what is not. Degree of precision is not one of them. Low precision simply indicates a less developed model, including many poorly understood variables (at the current state of knowledge). That is the demarcation of a "mature science," but not science in general.

      Also, "hard science" is a term lay people use for "mature science" because they think the rules of hard science are fixed in stone. I doubt you would find a practicing researcher in physics or chemistry who thinks their theories are set in stone.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    26. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Milton Friedman was not a billionaire, but was really rather rich because he did in fact apply his knowledge to money, not just knowledge itself.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
    27. Re:Why there are no economist billionaires. by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

      Yes. Medicine is not a science - it's tech support. Highly advanced tech support, of course.

      --
      http://rocknerd.co.uk
  13. A panacea? by rhiorg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps we could build vehicles that run on subnotebook computers. It would be a cost-effective solution to our energy crisis, and could save the big 3 automakers!

  14. Yo! Asus! Listen up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Asus's success is killing it. If you've been to their website, it is slow as a pig, 24x7.

    Part of it is due to a clueless webdesigner, who loaded it up with flash, javascript and all sorts of other crap. Add to that a big rise in people visiting, and suddenly their servers are dog slow (at best) and down (too often).

    In fact, it's a classic example of what not to do with web design and IT planning.

    So, Asus, could you PLEASE put some bright people on this, and give them the resources they need?

    At to the bright people: could you PLEASE not make having Javascript and Flash mandatory? Not all of us are smoking the Web 2.0 crack.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Yo! Asus! Listen up! by tknd · · Score: 1

      At to the bright people: could you PLEASE not make having Javascript and Flash mandatory? Not all of us are smoking the Web 2.0 crack.

      The general population (the opposite of the slashdot demographic) loves flash. It is the "ooo shiny" effect of marketing.

  15. my advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never open a bank account in return for receiving a free gadget. You'll find that you won't be able to afford your "free" gadget, what with all the service fees and penalties you'll be paying on your bank account, ATM fees, plus the minimum deposit requirements and foregone interest you could've been earning elsewhere. AND they'll be spamming you about home equity loans ("loans available below prime!"), credit cards, etc.

    And the "notebook" will likely be a piece of junk loaded with adware.

    There's a reason they make these offers. That reason is the bank wants to make money from you.

  16. Mini mee too products by SandyBrownBPK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I kinda like the "free with" concept, except... a PC, even a mini, is still a LOT more complicated than, say, a toaster! And something like THAT is what is really needed for people who just want to browse the Internet and do e-mail! As a retired former software support engineer, it is painfully apparent that a Windows PC or even a MAC requires more tech savvy than your average consumer is ever going to possess! (Consider managing the backup process, for example.)

  17. Repeat by kurtis25 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't they try this with desktop computers. When my sister went to college dad got dial up internet from MSN which came with a free computer which dad gave to her. It only makes sense to give away computers to use internet, especially now that companies are inserting ads. If my ISP stands to make money off of each PC on the network then the more PCs I have the better off they are. If you gave me a free subcompact-notebook, I would surf the internet more because I would be portable within my house.

    1. Re:Repeat by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      If you gave me a free subcompact-notebook, I would surf the internet more because I would be portable within my house.

      Umm, they don't want you to actually use that connection.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:Repeat by fermion · · Score: 1
      We will see laptops given away with various services for one simple reason. Laptops are quickly becoming cheaper than desktops. LED screens are becoming cheap, there is cost saving in not having the large desktop case, we are having increasing monolithic components. The desktop computer, at the low end, are going to disappear. In addition, one of the most expensive component on the laptop, the screen, is going to get smaller to make the computer smaller. The idea of $1000 for a small laptop is not out of the question, if you want a full powered computer in a small space you have to pay for it, but a minimal computer in a small space will be cheap.

      However we are a while out from free laptops. The technology for putting together these small machines is new. We are going to need some further integration. The high resolution screens are going to have to become cheaper. Most people can survive with a 9 inch screen, if the resolution is there. Then there is the issue of batteries. I seem to recall the base battery on the esus is crap, and people thought they were getting the extended. Finally, either users are going to have to accept *nix in these freeby machines, or MS will have to drastically review pricing for it's current OS. I don't think that manufacturers are going to accept the OS as 50% of the product cost.

      The bank thing is possible if they can get the price down to $100. Otherwise, I don't know what service would work. About the only thing would be cell based internet connectivity. I don't know how much phone companies want this though. They are already complaining that user are using the internet too much, and not making enough phone calls. I gues not so many people are going over their contract limits.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Repeat by potat0man · · Score: 1

      When my sister went to college dad got dial up internet from MSN which came with a free computer which dad gave to her.

      So that contract for his dial-up service is going to expire...what? This autumn? :-)

  18. Merging of notebook and cell-phone? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I suppose that's the way we are going with blackberries and iphones. If the Eee could be used for making a phone call, it would be something like a blackberry on steroids.

    1. Re:Merging of notebook and cell-phone? by Kuj0317 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I suppose that's the way we are going with blackberries and iphones. If the Eee could be used for making a phone call, it would be something like a blackberry on steroids. or... perhaps a blackberry on crack? say, a "crackberry" if you will?
    2. Re:Merging of notebook and cell-phone? by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Like the HTC TyTN II ?

      I can call people, send/receive emails and ssh into linux boxes, all with the same piece of kit.

  19. Good for Linux, bad for Windows... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1
    the margin for OS licenses sold with PCs has been slim for a while, now it's dropping sharply for laptops as well.

    It's not unlikely that major vendors will now put some effort into a user-friendly Linux, something that the volunteer crowd has failed at terribly in the past 10 years.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  20. Low end minis by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think they are of value to some techies, and with a lot of non techies they are even overkill.

    Ever lug around a heavy laptop all day on service calls? Id have loved to have some of these things back then..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Low end minis by Sique · · Score: 1

      I always wished for such a small form factor portable computer as a means to console into some big iron. Since Psion is no longer with us, there was no such thing.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Low end minis by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      There was the HP 200lx, but not sure how IPX would have worked on them, or if there was network card. ( was a novell guy back in the old days )

      But was good for the console port on a router.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Low end minis by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      I think that there is a serious market for something which fits between a notebook and a blackberry in terms of size and capability.

      Laptops and desktops will stick around because that's what you need to do extended computing- sitting down for 30 minutes to several hours to work on a paper, a PowerPoint presentation, write some code, play a video game, or do graphic design. Anything smaller than the current MacBook or MacBook Air models would give me eye strain and carpal tunnel.

      But I'd argue that as the internet and computers have become more ingrained into our lives, there are more and more short-term computing sessions- anywhere from five seconds to five minutes- where it would be handy to have something just a bit bigger than an iPhone or BlackBerry, but smaller than a full-scale laptop. Looking up directions or restaurants on Google Maps, finding movie showings, Googling some random fact, checking weather or stock prices, using Facebook, checking email, playing a quick video game. I'd say that the perfect size would be something that folds up to be a bit smaller than a CD case.

      However, I disagree with the idea that the only way to make money on these is to sell services. At such small sizes, interface design is going to be everything; the iPod proves how good interface makes a difference, and how people are willing to pay for that. Apple and Brand X might both produce a pocket-size laptop with equivalent functionality, but if one has a better screen, keyboard, and touchpad, and packs those features into a smaller package with better battery life, it's going to sell better.

  21. The real future - commodity laptops by Animats · · Score: 1

    In most big US drugstores and office supply stores, and in every WalMart, there is a section that has pocket calculators, pocket dictionaries, low-end PDAs, and other small electronics. Some of those devices are quite sophisticated, even though they're very cheap.

    Soon we'll be seeing laptops in that section, in a blister pack hanging from a hook. During "back to school" season, there will be big piles of the things. We'll see this as soon as the price can be brought below $200.

    There will still be higher-end laptops, but the low end units will be the volume market.

  22. Of course microsoft might very well adapt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sell a stripped down version of windows xp
    "Windows Netbook" to the OEMs for almost nothing and then charge users for extra features like wallpapers, little games like solitaire and pinball and follow the MAC example of charging for annual incremental updates which the sheep will happily pay for.

    1. Re:Of course microsoft might very well adapt by klingens · · Score: 1

      If they do, their absolute profits will plummet. You can't hide the same amount of profit in absolute dollar value in a product half the price easily. Especially when the new product costs almost as much to develop as the old one.

  23. soon, MS Windows will cost more than the hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and Bill Gates can make even more unethical and undeserved profits.

    It's a real shame there's so many suckers in the world ruining it for the rest of us.

  24. Won't happen. Here's why. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Sorry. Let me tell you about a hard and fast rule of reality:


    The things which I think are cool, either die early or succeed only in limited niche markets with other don't-quite-fit people like myself.

    Stuff which I find lame and un-appealing, (like iPods, cellphones, Facebook and instant messaging, for instance), go gangbusters and change the shape of reality as we know it.

    I think the eee PC is super-cool, therefore it is doomed to be an awesome device which will enjoy a respected but mediocre public presence at best. --And I can see the pattern emerging already; a massive squirrely investment panic by all the big companies based on early excitement for a market model people are already backing off from. Read the engadget comments under the UMPC's sometime. People are already bitching about the various decisions made by Asus and the new designs put forth. That must-have magic is already kaput, the market force now running on the steam from geeks like myself and that's it. Sure, they've sold a million or so units already. But there are a million or so geeks in the world. I said 'niche'. I didn't say non-existent.

    The only way UMPC's will take over on the kind of level the big players are all terrified of missing out on is if the average girlfriend can't live without one. --And they're Oh-So-Almost, what with their lids which beg for stickers and funky colors. Sadly though, Hello Kitty, and Power Puff Girls, and Sailor Moon are old hat and there's nothing new driving sticker sales at the moment. And girlfriends, pardon the sexist broad-stroke generalization, aren't practically minded when it comes to tech gear. They want to talk and squeal and giggle over dramatic fluff with their friends and they want to have what their friends have and they want fashion statements. The UMPC come SOOO close, but sorry. Mini PC's which take half a minute to boot up, and need to be fiddled with and need to be sat down with and don't fit neatly into a purse aren't cool. They're lame. Sitting down and focusing is for when you're at home after work or school, and you already have a PC for that.

    The eee PC came close, with their pink 700's, but they've moved in a direction which pleases people like me; better screens, better keyboards, better functionality, etc. I am very happy about this. But take-over the world appeal? Neh.

    Now if there was an animated TV series sensation featuring empowered teen-age girls in cute outfits and dippy soap-operatic themes which sported hundreds of brilliant stickers which desperately needed to be affixed to a shiny mini laptop lid, then perhaps AT&T would have a chance to get their evil claws in. But until then, nope. Cell phones do it better, faster, longer, cuter and easier. And you don't have to wait thirty seconds for them to boot up. (Though, hopefully before the other shoe drops and the UMPC market is abandoned, somebody will have worked out the 'instant-on' thing.) --But I do find it wonderfully amusing to see all the big manufacturer's lose money because of catastrophic mis-readings of the market. Frankly, that's the only real way for me to get the device that I want at the price I want; for big companies to mis-read things. Seriously, this is enormously fun to watch, and by the end of it all, I'll have a cool little writing tool with a decent battery life and internet access for maybe $350.

    Of course, I could be wrong. It's Mercury Retrograde month, so I probably am, and in directions I can only guess at now even as I reach to click the 'submit' button. . .


    -FL

  25. Sounds good by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

    Hmm. If someone came out with something like the Asus Eee 900/901 with a built-in HSDPA modem and 802.11 tethering, for free, attached to a HSDPA broadband contract for, say, $20 to $30AUD per month... I'd be in like Flynn.

    Bring it on, I say!

    1. Re:Sounds good by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      wrong side of the world for you, but 3 do a usb hsdpa modem free on contract or £50 if its pay as you go. the data charges are the same for either £10 for 1gb £15 for 3gb and theres a 7gb monthly tarrif as well and they don't limit you to web pages only.

      works well with eee running ubuntu.

      alternately they have a skype phone for £40 (or free on contract)with 5000 minutes skype call time a month provided you top up £10 a month as you can use £5 of this for a months internet access. it works as a bluetooth modem on ubuntu or usb modem on windows. it's only 3g so relatively slow but it works fine on the EEE (windows tested, win2000 in Virtualbox) they even let you use the phone and data allowance on sister networks without roaming charges.

      While i'm wary of getting a contract with 3 they are probably the best mobile data service provider in the uk.

      However network coverage is quite hit and miss on the train it repeatedly dropped connection away from the stations.

      For me with broadband at home the skype phone works good enough for me, for someone else with no regular broadband the hspda modem is better.

      The standard battery on the EEE does at least 3 hours 5200mA after market batteries can be twice that capacity but i'm not so keen on the bulky designs.

      The small screen size of the EEE 701, causes occasional problems, selecting compiz settings can be tricky, it's better to tab around the gui.

      The 900 is an improvement but I still don't regret getting the 701.

      I have had bigger laptops for years but only since having the EEE have I really got real mobile use out of a laptop.

      If I think i need my extras, usb hard drives, cables, slimline dvd drive i take it about in a little dvd player bag. If I don't I just take it along with me.
      in a small leather case.

      It almost replaces my pda phone
      https://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=C62D54A5-183A-4A1E-A7E2-CC500ED1F19A&displaylang=en
      might help it's a microsoft pda emulator and wm5 image. it might be good in wine or a vm.

  26. Would you like a free IPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For how long now have companies been using IPods to attract people to their service or product. "Buy 3 rooms of new carpeting today and get a FREE IPOD!" It doesn't mean that there is no real money to be made in direct sales of IPods. It means that IPods are very popular products at a reasonably affordable price point. In fact, so popular and affordable that it is worth the loss of the wholesale price of an IPod from your profit margin just for the added advertising draw "giving them away" has.

    The mini-pc offers are no different...

  27. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hello Kitty, and Power Puff Girls, and Sailor Moon are old hat"
    You obviously haven't been to Japan lately.......

  28. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > UMPC market is abandoned, somebody will have worked out the 'instant-on' thing

    Check out the Nokia UMPCs. The N800/N810 will run for a week on standby, and are instant on from that state. You just tap the screen and it's ready to roll in under half a second. The new ones have Firefox and the same screen res as an eeepc, but in a smaller form factor.

    The N800 only has a stylus, but the N810 has a mini keyboard. Runs Linux underneath.

  29. Its hurting, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is fairy tale thinking. I sense a disgruntled UMPC maker venting as he sees his inflated profit margins disappear.

    How many Wii's, PSPs, DSs,mobile phones or other cheaper electronic gadgets do you see being distributed by banks or other businesses? The most you can expect is a usb stick and that will probably be way out of proportion to the benefit they hope to get out of you. This guy is clearly talking out of his ass.

  30. With a difference by pmontra · · Score: 1

    I have no uses for a phone without a contract with a carrier, but I've a lot of things to do with a subnotebook with no add-on services attached. Basically everything I've been doing with a PC in the last 20 years or so.

    A subnotebook is not a notebook but it's not a phone too. Businesses will try to attach services to them, but I don't think that it will be impossible to find a bare subnotebook. Well, if a subnotebook with a two-year HSDPA contract will cost as much one without I'll get it, but I won't if I have to pay f more.

  31. Re:I'm not sure the author understands voodoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There, fixed the title for you.

    If these mini notebooks achieve the same level of product differentiation as current laptops, margins should be similar. In fact, if the mini notebooks are sold with service, that offers the chance for more differentiation. I mean, when people buy mobile phones, they usually choose their carrier first (usually). That means that the margins for the device can be higher because the different service is adding another level of differentiation. There is, apparently, an economic value in NOT having a service. Maybe some economist type can explain to me why an oligopoly should be allowed to demand rents for what once was free.
  32. You don't always pay full price for notebooks by phatcabbage · · Score: 1

    the successful pricing model for 'mini me too' laptops will look nothing like the notebook pricing model (where you always pay full price for the hardware)
    I know that as recently as two years ago when I was working for Circuit City, we would discount laptops up to $150 off of the price we paid just to get people in the door -- and hopefully sell some warranties, accessories, and services (our real money-makers).
    I'm just pointing out that we've already hit the point the author was talking about in notebooks, too.
  33. Microsoft was heading this way in the '90s, but... by argent · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was heading this way with increasingly powerful Windows CE clamshells from IBM and others, but around 2000 they redirected all their effort towards Windows NT "Tablet PC"s. Now Linux is the new Windows CE and Microsoft is backpedalling over shutting down XP as they scramble after a market they could have owned.

  34. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/pc/

  35. 10NES by tepples · · Score: 1

    Trying to create a proprietary solution when an open one already exists is going to be near impossible. Then how did Nintendo manage to sell its lockout chip in a world full of lockout-free Apple II, Commodore 64, and ZX Spectrum home computers?
  36. Change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple seems to be doing an OK job of changing the 'free' perception.

  37. Calculators by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember when TI released a calculator with a red LED display? Back in 1979 or so? Cost what, $2000? When $2,000 was real money. My dad used to make the comparison, that calculators used to cost half of what a car cost, "now they give them away at gas stations with a full tank of gas". Interesting to see a internet laptop being given away with the opening of a new bank account. Now if they can just resolve the northbridge energy consumption problem, with an SSD, and a solar panel on the lid, you might not be able to ever top off the battery, but certianly go a week between charges with on and off use 1-2 hours a day. Amazing that we're getting to the point of 'free' computers.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  38. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Hey, shitty 1970s and 1980s hair and clothing styles have come back. Anything can happen!

    That said, I agree with what you're saying. The "ultra mobile" fad has come and gone a half dozen times, and each time it falls flat. The only way it'll make significant headways is if the devices make significant bounds over the existing (and previous) ultra-mobiles: they need to be instant-on, and of comparable functionality to desktop machines so that users don't have problems interfacing them.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  39. "netbook" fits the argument better by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 1

    Intel calls the eee PC and clones "netbooks", identifying the market as "internet access", and not "general purpose PC".

    If they're right, and people buy these for internet access, then the phone analogy makes perfect sense. Although they can do anything a PC can do, the crucial thing is if enough people buy it for that specific purpose (it doesn't have to be everyone).

  40. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    You have a very disturbing vision on women.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  41. So let's just compare subsidies by tepples · · Score: 1

    You must be better at mindreading than I am I just read between the lines. If you wish, call that "reading minds", but it's no big feat.

    He keeps insisting that the phone is free. In his first post, he talked about phones that are "free on a contract". A median individual customer might call such a phone "free" compared to a phone that is only partially subsidized.

    It's the same logic as the people who don't look at whether they can afford something, but just look at the monthly payments.

    Except these people make up a large and therefore profitable segment of the population of Slashdot's home country.

    So consider this: Forget about "free". Is it true that the phones that European networks completely subsidize have more features than the phones that U.S. networks completely subsidize?

  42. PAYG == pay as you go by tepples · · Score: 1

    What is PAYG? "PAYG" stands for pay as you go, a method of mobile phone billing.
  43. I just got back from the theater. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    You have a very disturbing vision on women.


    Hey, I just spent a forced two hours in a theater crammed with chicks who were rabidly lapping up, "Sex in the City." If that doesn't reinforce your vision of the female stereotype, nothing will. Of course, one theater filled with ditzy women is not ALL theaters filled with ditzy women. I know this in my heart of hearts, and I know numerous women who would never be caught dead in such place. But the girl I happen to be dating isn't one of them. --You can't choose who to love; my sweetie is dear and awesome and brilliant, but she's also a sucker for all the stereotypical mall-culture bullshit. --For her part, she hates how I leave 'shaver bits' in the sink and she'd never read Slashdot, so it all balances out. Humans come packaged with lots of fundamentally silly settings, but they can still be excellent people underneath. Please don't mistake my disrespecting the stereotypical behavior for disrespecting the person. --I'm just as ridiculous as anybody! Heck, we all blow farts, and farts are just plain idiotic.


    -FL

  44. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by mgblst · · Score: 1

    A little superstistious aren't we. How do people like you get modded up. Go back to reading the astrology section of your newspaper, aligning your crystals, and avoiding ladders.

    How does shit like this get modded up.

  45. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    A little superstistious aren't we. How do people like you get modded up. Go back to reading the astrology section of your newspaper, aligning your crystals, and avoiding ladders.


    Newspaper astrology? No thanks. That's pointless. The real thing is actually useful. Of course, you wouldn't know this if you don't explore it first. --The practice of the true skeptic is to examine first and render a decision afterwards. --And if you had looked properly and honestly then you wouldn't be able to dismiss things so easily. This stuff is entirely testable, but it's the kind of testing which is best done for oneself. There's an amazing world out there, far bigger than many realize, and it's open to anybody who bothers to put their boots on and step outside. One of the better sites is this one. --Extremely comprehensive and free. --Though, I find Asian astrology to be often more robust in certain ways.

    Interestingly, most who start off with a cynical view are actually incapable of exploring openly. There's a weird knee-jerk auto-response programmed into many people which makes them react with a gut-felt loathing and embarrassment which keeps them from learning how the world really works; from finding their own power. Thus it's a huge challenge to be a real skeptic; most just pretend and use the label to justify allowing their programmed fears to control them. It's easier that way, but self-defeating. It takes work to break out of the bonds, which is why they're called bonds.


    -FL

  46. Re:Won't happen. Here's why. . . by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

    THIRTY SECONDS? Are you using knoppix or something? puppy linux is 128 mb, modern hdd get 150 mb/s, and solid state is suposed to be faster your either not good at math, or dare defile /. with using a non-hacked, as-is device, espetialy where OS is conserned. do you really neeed xandros to check you mail, or do anything else on a pc for that matter?

    --
    I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack