It's more complex than that. There two strategic paths we are taking towards full automated driving. Commercial driving where the only way is to leap from current statr to fully automated driving and consumer driving where the path is gradual transition from driving assistance to driving automation. Both paths are complex and encounter a lot of dramatic setbacks.
> Newbies are generally paranoid and hypervigilant.
It's more complex than that, it's a pendulum period where attitude swings from being overconfident and fearful that eventually comes to realistic perception of situation on the road as a result of practice a lot of which could be part of driving school curriculum.
Historically, the concept of "shrinking to the sane size" is a fantasy. Shrinking always has been associated with decline, slow or catastrophic. That's the Darwin's law.
Africans want to survive, they want to break through, we do not want to survlvive and there are no Joneses ahead of us.
>No, the stupid part is believing that a news outlet driven by greed cannot be trusted, or that a propaganda site can
I need an actual quote that says that.
Nobody "trusts" nothing. People who you think "trust" Breitbart are just brainwashing themselves. It's not "trust", it's ideological alignment.
From the other hand people who "trust" CNN, _are_ mostly brainwashed liberal imbeciles confused by CNN having a "mainstream" status. Breitbart does not have that, so nobody expects "trust".
There is nothing stupid in thinking that all news media is driven by greed/catering and/or ideology/propaganda.
Denying ideology IS ideology.
Perception is subjective. Its true that there are 50 shades of grey, but in general that's what it is.
There is science dealing objectively with simple systems, but we already know everything that is possible about these, what is left is irreducible systems like human society, where scientific method is limited. All we have is biased data collection.
How's that different from any tabloid media? Reader explotation for nefarious purposes. Practically any user content driven popular website without active and skillful moderation becomes a tabloid of fake news 0-60 in 3 sec.
>This means voting for Democratic candidates and donating to them is important.
Donating to Democratics will have another, mediated, effect as well. Since they are known to be terrible at keeping good economy they will run down the economy which will result in lesser carbon footprint.
Dumbass, you selectively quoted the conduct. It says explicitly that complains by certain groups selected broadly by their gender, race and sexuality won't be considered
I do not think you understand the point I was saying.
Let me try from another perspective.
Bacteria knows how to swim from the "bad" area to the "good" area. You know how? It does not think, it does not measure the gradient, it only know to do one thing: move faster or slower. That's it. When in "bad" area it moves faster, when in "good" area it moves slower. That is enough for bacteria to concentrate in "good" area instead of "bad" area.
Obama is the stupidest of all bacteria. He did not know how to move faster. He is afraid to move faster because of the politburo that holds him.
Slashdot Mirror
It's more complex than that. There two strategic paths we are taking towards full automated driving. Commercial driving where the only way is to leap from current statr to fully automated driving and consumer driving where the path is gradual transition from driving assistance to driving automation. Both paths are complex and encounter a lot of dramatic setbacks.
> Newbies are generally paranoid and hypervigilant.
It's more complex than that, it's a pendulum period where attitude swings from being overconfident and fearful that eventually comes to realistic perception of situation on the road as a result of practice a lot of which could be part of driving school curriculum.
> as with Islam extremists today
You gotta be shitting me.
Historically, the concept of "shrinking to the sane size" is a fantasy. Shrinking always has been associated with decline, slow or catastrophic. That's the Darwin's law.
Africans want to survive, they want to break through, we do not want to survlvive and there are no Joneses ahead of us.
You can, but it is not needed for survival, so nobody gives a shit
Look how well it works for Europe.
Economy needs 18-34 demographics to buy all the stupid excessive consumerist crap: iPhones, trips to Burning Man, engagement rings, cars wtih spoilers.
I would not be surprised if a lot of "materials" were generated by secret services as well.
There is always that one crime in the state that is the favorite of the government to make up charges.
I counted.
Drones do not have any needs already.
They do not "need" humans exactly as my car does not "need" me to gas it up every week. It does not care, it's a fricking car
No. DuckDuckGo is a nascent advertising company.
>No, the stupid part is believing that a news outlet driven by greed cannot be trusted, or that a propaganda site can
I need an actual quote that says that.
Nobody "trusts" nothing. People who you think "trust" Breitbart are just brainwashing themselves. It's not "trust", it's ideological alignment.
From the other hand people who "trust" CNN, _are_ mostly brainwashed liberal imbeciles confused by CNN having a "mainstream" status. Breitbart does not have that, so nobody expects "trust".
Scientism is much bigger problem than flat earhters crowd and such.
I am going to have my very own flat Earth convention in my car. Me and my Waze app.
There is nothing stupid in thinking that all news media is driven by greed/catering and/or ideology/propaganda.
Denying ideology IS ideology.
Perception is subjective. Its true that there are 50 shades of grey, but in general that's what it is.
There is science dealing objectively with simple systems, but we already know everything that is possible about these, what is left is irreducible systems like human society, where scientific method is limited. All we have is biased data collection.
How's that different from any tabloid media? Reader explotation for nefarious purposes. Practically any user content driven popular website without active and skillful moderation becomes a tabloid of fake news 0-60 in 3 sec.
> And they were designed so that the people who saw them would be most likely to engage
You don't say.
I misread your name as Chav.
>This means voting for Democratic candidates and donating to them is important.
Donating to Democratics will have another, mediated, effect as well. Since they are known to be terrible at keeping good economy they will run down the economy which will result in lesser carbon footprint.
It's all good. The best is when there are no ads.
Dumbass, you selectively quoted the conduct. It says explicitly that complains by certain groups selected broadly by their gender, race and sexuality won't be considered
Thanks.
Next: not only you have to subscribe, you have to watch it as well.
Liberalism.
I do not think you understand the point I was saying.
Let me try from another perspective.
Bacteria knows how to swim from the "bad" area to the "good" area. You know how? It does not think, it does not measure the gradient, it only know to do one thing: move faster or slower. That's it. When in "bad" area it moves faster, when in "good" area it moves slower. That is enough for bacteria to concentrate in "good" area instead of "bad" area.
Obama is the stupidest of all bacteria. He did not know how to move faster. He is afraid to move faster because of the politburo that holds him.