I think originally it was meant to convey running a small freelance business out of your home, or something less formal than a normal part time job.
Think writing blog posts, or driving for Uber just on the occasions that you've got nothing better to do.
The majority of Android phones sold aren't even running the latest version of Android at the time of sale.
Why would we presume that security updates are current?
The electoral college was/not/ designed to reduce the voting power of the majority of people, it was designed to ensure that the states had voting rights relative to their population.
Do you have something you can cite that shows this, because it's not my understanding, and it doesn't even make sense.
A popular vote ensure that the states had voting rights relative to their population. More population, more votes.
My understanding (possibly misguided) was that the electoral college was designed to ensure that states with less population still had at least some voice in the decision making.
But this is stupid because it also blocks the highly desirable goal of giving traffic priority to Netflix, which many would pay extra for. What is wrong with letting most people do something that is beneficial for them and they would like? Preventing that is how we got the war on drugs.
That may be your highly desirable goal. My goal is not to allow Netflix to have anymore traffic priority then Hulu, or HBO, or XFinity. The internet is what it is because newcomers were able to come and play with a minimum barrier to entry, to me protecting that is of the utmost importance. This is not analogous to the war on drugs. This is more like complaining that a law against price gouging is curtailing the price gougers freedoms.
ISP's are supposed to provide access to the internet, not their selected version of the internet
Why? Why does it have to be that way? What if that's what a lot of people want and are willing to pay for?
If people did not want that they would not pay for it and it would die off.
I would argue that it doesn't have to be this way, but it should be as long as most people have only one choice of broadband provider. You want this world where people have choices. Then we need some form of line sharing agreement so that I actually have a choice to make.
Also, this version of the internet has been tried before. It's what AOL was doing, and people left it in droves as soon as they could.
It's so irritating. I don't have much occasion to go to the app unless I need to change settings or reboot a device.
They change it frequently enough, that whenever I need to find it, it's listed under a different name and I have no idea where to look.
Except for you most likely will have to still do the dance every year.
For me every option says that the price goes up after 12 months regardless of if you select to have a contract or not.
I'm not sure I believe this is true. I've been to many concerts where they've stated no recording devices.
The music industry has not successfully sued (settled maybe) very many "home" pirates, but I don't recall sample quality coming up in any of the lawsuits I've read about.
The movie industry on the other hand has a history of going after cam quality videos.
It seems that they are much more likely to go after well known exploiters, those they can make money off of, or those they can make precedent off of before they worry about the low vs high quality.
Log into your account.
Click on My Services
Where you see your internet service listed. Click on Mange
Click on Manage your home hotspot
Change the setting, I believe it can take some time to actually take affect.
In my understanding. Jamie Thomas used Kazaa, which did not use BitTorrent on the back end.
This actually made it easier for the prosecution as they could show a full upload from her account.
They need to quick dicking around and make a mobile app for it (and support ChromeCast too, while they're at it).
I have Prime, but I never use it for video because it's not convenient. Also, for that reason, I would never suggest it to someone else if they were looking for a place to watch videos. It's nice for 2 day shipping though.
They've reversed on almost every bad decision at this point.
If they can just get around to reversing on backwards compatibility, I won't have any more reasons not to buy one.
Don't do it Microsoft. I've been so productive lately.
The issue with this in my experience (granted I've programmed exclusively for a single large company) is that Ops has no idea if the code needs to be reworked or not. They don't do the testing. Just make sure Prod is stable. They make Dev's fill out a bunch of paperwork so that they can claim it's not their fault when Prod crashes then they push whatever crap fell out of my fingers onto the box.
I'd be willing to pay for it, but I think Tivo's service fee's are way to expensive. $500 for a lifetime pass, or $15 a month (last time I checked). What are you getting for that? Pretty much just access to the guide. Why is just knowing what's on at what time worth twice as much (nearly) as Netflix's whole service.
I used to run a home brew DVR, and I paid for the guide data then from some company I don't recall. It was $20 or $30 a year.
Slashdot Mirror
Business to Business. So some company scraping the data to sell to another company. Twitter would rather sell direct to the end user.
I think originally it was meant to convey running a small freelance business out of your home, or something less formal than a normal part time job.
Think writing blog posts, or driving for Uber just on the occasions that you've got nothing better to do.
The majority of Android phones sold aren't even running the latest version of Android at the time of sale.
Why would we presume that security updates are current?
The electoral college was /not/ designed to reduce the voting power of the majority of people, it was designed to ensure that the states had voting rights relative to their population.
Do you have something you can cite that shows this, because it's not my understanding, and it doesn't even make sense.
A popular vote ensure that the states had voting rights relative to their population. More population, more votes.
My understanding (possibly misguided) was that the electoral college was designed to ensure that states with less population still had at least some voice in the decision making.
But this is stupid because it also blocks the highly desirable goal of giving traffic priority to Netflix, which many would pay extra for. What is wrong with letting most people do something that is beneficial for them and they would like? Preventing that is how we got the war on drugs.
That may be your highly desirable goal. My goal is not to allow Netflix to have anymore traffic priority then Hulu, or HBO, or XFinity. The internet is what it is because newcomers were able to come and play with a minimum barrier to entry, to me protecting that is of the utmost importance. This is not analogous to the war on drugs. This is more like complaining that a law against price gouging is curtailing the price gougers freedoms.
ISP's are supposed to provide access to the internet, not their selected version of the internet
Why? Why does it have to be that way? What if that's what a lot of people want and are willing to pay for?
If people did not want that they would not pay for it and it would die off.
I would argue that it doesn't have to be this way, but it should be as long as most people have only one choice of broadband provider. You want this world where people have choices. Then we need some form of line sharing agreement so that I actually have a choice to make.
Also, this version of the internet has been tried before. It's what AOL was doing, and people left it in droves as soon as they could.
It's so irritating. I don't have much occasion to go to the app unless I need to change settings or reboot a device.
They change it frequently enough, that whenever I need to find it, it's listed under a different name and I have no idea where to look.
Amazon gives free unlimited backup account with prime (which is around $99)
I checked on this because I it sounded too good. Here's what I found.
Your Amazon Prime membership comes with Amazon Prime Photos, unlimited photo storage and 5 GB for videos, music, and other files.
Unlimited backup of any files is $60 a year.
It's a perfectly cromulant word, he just needs to embiggen his vocabulizer.
Except for you most likely will have to still do the dance every year. For me every option says that the price goes up after 12 months regardless of if you select to have a contract or not.
It sounds awesome, but the latency will kill you.
I'm not sure I believe this is true. I've been to many concerts where they've stated no recording devices.
The music industry has not successfully sued (settled maybe) very many "home" pirates, but I don't recall sample quality coming up in any of the lawsuits I've read about.
The movie industry on the other hand has a history of going after cam quality videos.
It seems that they are much more likely to go after well known exploiters, those they can make money off of, or those they can make precedent off of before they worry about the low vs high quality.
*their
Log into your account.
Click on My Services
Where you see your internet service listed. Click on Mange
Click on Manage your home hotspot
Change the setting, I believe it can take some time to actually take affect.
They disable the setting on the device and make you do it through there website, where it takes up to 24 hours I believe to change.
In my understanding. Jamie Thomas used Kazaa, which did not use BitTorrent on the back end. This actually made it easier for the prosecution as they could show a full upload from her account.
They need to quick dicking around and make a mobile app for it (and support ChromeCast too, while they're at it). I have Prime, but I never use it for video because it's not convenient. Also, for that reason, I would never suggest it to someone else if they were looking for a place to watch videos. It's nice for 2 day shipping though.
In that case, you'll probably make silly spelling mistakes.
It's like putting too much air in a balloon, and then something happens.
All those TVs and set top boxes are running Linux under Android, and Netflix is already supported on Android.
Very consistent, it's not like there were a mess of people that couldn't install the mandatory Windows 8.1 update. http://www.neowin.net/news/mic...
They've reversed on almost every bad decision at this point. If they can just get around to reversing on backwards compatibility, I won't have any more reasons not to buy one. Don't do it Microsoft. I've been so productive lately.
The issue with this in my experience (granted I've programmed exclusively for a single large company) is that Ops has no idea if the code needs to be reworked or not. They don't do the testing. Just make sure Prod is stable. They make Dev's fill out a bunch of paperwork so that they can claim it's not their fault when Prod crashes then they push whatever crap fell out of my fingers onto the box.
The general also claimed explicitly that the data has never been misused, by anyone. Even though there have been admitted cases of "LOVEINT".
I'd be willing to pay for it, but I think Tivo's service fee's are way to expensive. $500 for a lifetime pass, or $15 a month (last time I checked). What are you getting for that? Pretty much just access to the guide. Why is just knowing what's on at what time worth twice as much (nearly) as Netflix's whole service. I used to run a home brew DVR, and I paid for the guide data then from some company I don't recall. It was $20 or $30 a year.
If I don't survive, tell my wife "Hello."