Is it a conflict of interest if a jury member feels that he needed to send a murderer to jail because he didn't want himself or his family or anyone else to be injured by that person?
Absolutely. Because the statement assumes that the suspect is the murderer and makes no attempt to evaluate him based on the evidence.
Not really. She was repeatedly biased toward Apple. She allowed Apple to show their prior art to prove Samsung copied, but did not allow Samsung to show other prior art which would have invalidated Apple's design patents showing that everyone copies.
That doesn't seem like doing "pretty good". The whole point of a patent case is whether the patent was valid or not. And prior art is the top way to invalidate a patent.
Actually, the reasons you state are exactly why I run NoScript. It's not the ads I mind, it's the slowness, the crashing, the viruses and the annoyance that scripting brings that is the problem.
And having written the warranty software for a car company, I can assure you that they take this VERY seriously. Both in providing parts until the timeframe and in counting the days until they no longer have to.
It depends on intent. If the court decides that your business was made only to scam people, then no, you can't do that. You'll be convicted for wire fraud.
If you made a good faith effort to provide the services, then failed (sound familiar?), then your intent was to actually provide what you sold.
I bought a lifetime TiVo DVR service about 12 years ago and DirecTV STILL honors it on their DirecTV-branded DVRs. If you can see that the lifetime is cheaper than about 2 years worth of service, I'd say it's worth the risk. As it goes, I paid $250 to save $10/month for 12 years.
Since Galaxy S2 and S3 were both more highly rated than iPhone, isn't Samsung the one making the phone people want? And aren't the Bad Guys the ones trying to make you do what they want instead of what you want? Isn't that Apple? Or some patent troll who didn't invent anything but just dressed it up real pretty going around suing the actual inventors? Again, Apple.
Not really understanding your logic there...
Slashdot Mirror
Fuck the cloud. All my data is in Heaven administered by God! Nothing can go wrong. Everything is where it should be. Simply perfect.
"Heaven. Are you good enough?"
I've heard that God doesn't take care of data for people with such foul mouths....
Is it a conflict of interest if a jury member feels that he needed to send a murderer to jail because he didn't want himself or his family or anyone else to be injured by that person?
Absolutely. Because the statement assumes that the suspect is the murderer and makes no attempt to evaluate him based on the evidence.
Not really. She was repeatedly biased toward Apple. She allowed Apple to show their prior art to prove Samsung copied, but did not allow Samsung to show other prior art which would have invalidated Apple's design patents showing that everyone copies.
That doesn't seem like doing "pretty good". The whole point of a patent case is whether the patent was valid or not. And prior art is the top way to invalidate a patent.
The problem with the OJ trial is that all the evidence failed on a chain of custody basis. Hence, the jury was left with the limo driver's testimony.
Actually, the reasons you state are exactly why I run NoScript. It's not the ads I mind, it's the slowness, the crashing, the viruses and the annoyance that scripting brings that is the problem.
3) Yes. I absolutely believe that POLITICAL ASYLUM is intended to work exactly as you have described.
incarcerates more of its own people than did Josef Stalin
That's because Stalin killed them all: Genocide list
And having written the warranty software for a car company, I can assure you that they take this VERY seriously. Both in providing parts until the timeframe and in counting the days until they no longer have to.
It depends on intent. If the court decides that your business was made only to scam people, then no, you can't do that. You'll be convicted for wire fraud.
If you made a good faith effort to provide the services, then failed (sound familiar?), then your intent was to actually provide what you sold.
Tivo's "Lifetime" subscriptions last the lifetime of the device itself
Actually, on DirecTV, mine has lasted through about 4 DVRs per TV.
AT&T, Verizon and Sprint
Umm, I STILL have ACTUAL unlimited everything on Sprint, as far as I can tell...
I bought a lifetime TiVo DVR service about 12 years ago and DirecTV STILL honors it on their DirecTV-branded DVRs. If you can see that the lifetime is cheaper than about 2 years worth of service, I'd say it's worth the risk. As it goes, I paid $250 to save $10/month for 12 years.
I hear New Zealand allows almost zero immigration.
Actually, wouldn't it be 100% air quality problems. You know, there's not enough air? I'd say that's a problem.
No way. I heard there's only one computer on the whole planet and it's like a 386. Plus the latency will be murder on your games...
Since Galaxy S2 and S3 were both more highly rated than iPhone, isn't Samsung the one making the phone people want? And aren't the Bad Guys the ones trying to make you do what they want instead of what you want? Isn't that Apple? Or some patent troll who didn't invent anything but just dressed it up real pretty going around suing the actual inventors? Again, Apple. Not really understanding your logic there...
I just got Ice Cream Sandwich on my Galaxy S2, not that it mattered all that much.
Really? Where do you live? My doctor always sits down with me and discusses it.
And yet, Windows 7 is completely usable on my 1024x600 netbook. Sounds like Windows 8 won't be.
Plus, the Ribbon offers suggestions. I can change 10 settings at the same time to get a good look.
Here, go look for a specific [nasa.gov] picture on this site. Have fun.
1. Went to Search box
2. Typed "Crab Nebula"[enter]
3. Picture of Crab Nebula appeared.
Exactly what was the problem again?
Sure you can. Don't buy it. And encourage everyone else not to as well.
And yet, Amazon has become the #2 music store by selling unencumbered MP3s that could be easily copied. In other words, they sell:
1. What people want
2. In a format they want
3. That plays on everything
4. Without DRM
And they are making millions doing it. You really should try it instead of breaking the internet.
How many people are willing to give up the suburban dream of the house with a pool to help the species?
Lots. As soon as running a pool costs $10,000 / month. All you have to do is raise the price of the water and they'll figure it out themselves.
Ever hear of a "dry heat"? That's where most of this discussion is talking about (California, Arizona, Nevada, etc.).