I don't therefore I'm not... this is the converse of "I do, therefore I am." But the converse is rarely true. "I'm not, therefore I don't," is much a more accurate contrapositive, and funnier, in my opnion.
There are too many other ways of tracking unique vs. returning visitors. If a site relies only on a tracking cookie, it's their own fault for misrepresenting the new hits to their site.
It's not the fault of the person who deletes the cookie. It's the fault of the website for relying on flimsy evidence.
I for one have found no reason to pay for both an expensive electronic reader (that may break) and the e-books themselves. Anything that produces light creates eyestrain when read from for too long. Regular books are too easy, and much more convenient.
However, I might be convinced to buy an e-paper reader when that becomes available. E-ink would be the breakthrough that would make me finally consider buying books in anything other than the regular form.
Slashdot Mirror
I don't therefore I'm not... this is the converse of "I do, therefore I am." But the converse is rarely true. "I'm not, therefore I don't," is much a more accurate contrapositive, and funnier, in my opnion.
:)
But funny comment nevertheless.
You could be a Wal-Mart greeter.
There are too many other ways of tracking unique vs. returning visitors. If a site relies only on a tracking cookie, it's their own fault for misrepresenting the new hits to their site.
It's not the fault of the person who deletes the cookie. It's the fault of the website for relying on flimsy evidence.
Enough with the eating puns!
FTA: "...sweet tooth for cookies...a bad aftertaste...force fed in large quantities...on a diet." I think I'm going to be sick.
Remember, in Soviet Russia, the furniture designs YOU.
You're an English major? I didn't even minor in English and I found 4 spelling/grammatical errors in your short post.
Like I want to spend any free time explaining how some technology works to yet another stupid user. Who would go for this?
I for one have found no reason to pay for both an expensive electronic reader (that may break) and the e-books themselves. Anything that produces light creates eyestrain when read from for too long. Regular books are too easy, and much more convenient. However, I might be convinced to buy an e-paper reader when that becomes available. E-ink would be the breakthrough that would make me finally consider buying books in anything other than the regular form.