Sorry man, Israel has deserved that vote result for a long time. We stood alone in shielding them from it, and not because we're noble creatures, but because you second-coming fuckwits have a hard-on for the Jews legitimately possessing Jerusalem, even though the Arabs have far more claim to it, so your fucked up end-times prophecy can come true.
You don't hate Jews because you think the Israeli regime is totally fucked up. You don't have to support their fucking illegal settlement building in order to support them and their right to exist.
One of Obama's last acts was to *finally* earn an iota of respect back from the rest of the world by acknowledging that the Israelis are breaking the fucking UN mandate, and hence international law, after decades of preventing that declaration from coming to a vote.
Back in November there was a poll of over 100, million people you seem exceptionally willing to discount it.
I... don't know where to start.
That poll had a pretty clear winner. It wasn't trump.
He may have won the election as a whole based upon America's goofy slavery-era electoral system, but he certainly didn't win any poll.
Why do people like you say such stupid shit? Are you truly so intellectually weak, or just highly manipulative? I wish I knew you in person, so I could really gauge your dysfunction.
Then there was that poll about whether or not the UK should remain in the EU
What the fuck does this have to do with anything? You think Brexiters are pro-Trump?
Brexit still has plurality support in polls in Britain, today.
You know who doesn't? Donald Trump. Let's see what they say...
Donald Trump will be a good president: 15%
Donald Trump will be a bad president: 53%
Donald Trump as president makes the world a safer place: 10%
Donald Trump as president makes the world a more dangerous place: 66%
Donald Trump's victory is a welcome disruption from 'politics as usual': 26%
Donald Trump's victory sets a dangerous precedent for future elections: 58%
Can you just tell me why you're so full of shit? Did your parents teach you nothing of integrity? Have you bullshit your entire way through life?
I can't tell if you're dishonest, or just a fucking moron.
Frankly, I don't give a damn. We have another 20-30 years of potential EC upsets before the demographics make a conservative victory impossible.
You have been watching the rubber stamping of his cabinet, yes? To use any phrase other than special interest, or conservative leadership's wet-dream to define any one of his selections would be a flat out misdirection if it contained any truth at all.
It's the same exact shit he does when he mocks any other person.
Yes. He likes to mock people by implying that they're disabled. Fake news? Fuck you, dude.
You and your ilk are branding anything inconvenient to you as "fake news", like the inauguration turnout. Fake news. Show picture taken from the front, not the back, that'll make my claim more legit! Because every glass looks full from below.
No, the person you were replying to was saying there was no evidence that it happened in the instance cited by the person HE was replying to, which is 100% right (in fact, genetically speaking, it appears the Clovis "won" any kind of struggle that may have happened, even if their culture changed or ended)
So you can jam your assertion of my racism and incorrectness right up your ass.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said... People do get "pushed out".
But evaluating cultural shifts (changes in the way groups of people do things) doesn't imply anyone being pushed out or not, and this is the case with Clovis and Folsom. Another good example is Rome an Greece.
The "Who knew... just another kind of Native Americans?" junk is particularly stupid. The people called "Native Americans" today are just the descendants (ignoring how many of them are also descended from Europeans, sometimes proportionally more so than from non-Europeans) of the most recent waves of migration to the Americas from Eurasia [wikipedia.org]. It's rarely mentioned how these later waves likely destroyed previous cultures in the Americas, such as the Clovis people [wikipedia.org],
Clovis and Folsum were "cultures," not races of people. There is precisely zero evidence that anybody "wiped out" the Clovis culture.
because that wouldn't fit with the leftist narrative of today's "Native Americans" being perpetual victims.
Like I said about the taxes... I don't think I'm smart to really see all angles of the vast amount of things that would affect... I'm just certain that a tax on... let's call it planetary carbon redistribution... would have a much larger effect against the externalized costs of a coal plant vs. that of a windmill.
I'm definitely not on the side of any of the proposed economic solutions, but the argument that the true cost of fossil power when externalized costs are factored in makes it the least appealing form of energy available at this point in time seems to hold a lot of water for me, hence I'm inclined to agree that a taxation against such things would definitely raise their cost a lot more than their competition's.
I have a few questions for you. What do you think windmills are made of?
I have one question for you- what do you think coal power plants are made of, and what is it exactly that you think they burn every day to keep producing that power?
Overall- I just can't wrap my head around the economics of taxation's total effect on the system, but i'm quite sure any coal power plant worth its salt dumps many "windmills" per day of CO2 into the atmosphere, efficiently sucked from the depths of the earth's deepest and most stable carbon sink.
If I'm wrong, forgive me, but I have trouble believing I am (and couldn't find a quick and easy way to find out)
If "affordable" healthcare includes distributing antibiotics like tic-tacs to people whenever they whine about an infection, maybe we are avoiding the creation of new and exciting infectious bacteria by continuing to fail to provide access to anti-biotics...
Spoken like someone who has ever been on state-run medicaid. I assure you, they won't give you antibiotics until they're 5 minutes from intubating you, and I am *not* arguing for the awesomeness of that way of thinking.
Simply said, one does not coerce their medicaid doctor into giving them medications they shouldn't be given for fear of losing their money. One very easily talks their private-care doctor into giving them *just about any fucking thing they want*. You'll find this is a large factor in the US fear of abolishing private run healthcare.
I gave a direct quote from WebMD. Don't like it- too bad.
You gave an out-of-context quote from WebMD, which makes you a misleading (lying) sack of shit.
"Rhino horn is used to increase sexual virility" is also a 100% true statement, along with the other part of the sentence that says, ", though there is no scientific evidence that it is effective in this capacity". When you quote the first half without the second, it makes you a piece of shit.
When resistance can be a simple reconfiguration of a protein on their cell membrane that was already otherwise not-required for their basic life functions, it costs them nothing at all to be resistant.
One shouldn't look at it as a problem if them having to actively defend against antibiotics, the burden of hurting them is entirely on the ability of the antibiotics to target them. Change happens naturally over time for any species, we're simply applying selective pressure for change that erases the bullseye(s) that antibiotics aim at.
I'm told rhino horn is highly effective as well. BRB, gotta make myself some colloidal silver. I've learned that medical literature claiming it is a weak-at-best antibiotic is just trying to keep me paying for expensive designer antibiotics. It's actually super strong. That's why less people died from infections back in the day vs. today. Thanks for cluing me into garlic. I'll help convince the CDC that these things work for aggressive bacterial infections. Stupid libtards and their regulated drugs.
Well, we can't maintain our per-capita productivity, and hence our economic standing in the world without antibiotics, so there's that. But ya, burgers are important, too.
Been there, done that. Younger, no health insurance. Didn't want to waste money by going to the doctor. Had no idea strep could progress to infect your ears, sinuses, and anything else up in your head. Woke up one night, couldn't breathe anymore.
I don't fuck with infections anymore
Some basic analysis of his reply and the comment he replied to suggests he was mocking the claim that Medicaid (overuse of the antibiotics in humans) is the problem, not overuse of antibiotics.
I can play that game too, you piece of intellectually dishonest piece of shit.
Here- 222% more people voted for Hillary than voted for conservative candidates.
Sure, in the GE, Hilary was their only blue option, and sure, *twice* as many people voted in the GE, but ya. A more fair assessment of the popular vote tally would be that you're a fucking piece of shit spreading really bad logic in an effort to murder innocent brain cells around you trying to actually understand how it all works.
Obviously the people didn't prefer Clinton - the majority did not vote for her.
It doesn't matter whether they did or not- I mean, the argument that they did, given her very obvious plurality, is a lot better than your shit ass argument.. but that isn't relevant. You keep moving the goal posts to make your lame ass argument hold water, but unfortunately that boat is shot to all shit.
You claim you were pointing out that he was lying for saying Clinton won a majority... Only he didn't say that.
I point that out. You then call me a liar for speaking to that fact. I'm so fucking sorry you exist. You're killing this country. You really are. I hope you see that some day. You're a disease.
Absolutely. Since the dawn of verbal communication, I'm fairly certain that almost every single one of us has realized just how uncommon it is- after all, we're the only ones who have it.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah yes, if you're not with them, no matter how atrocious their behavior, you're for their extermination.
Seriously, go jump in a fucking wood chipper.
Sorry man, Israel has deserved that vote result for a long time. We stood alone in shielding them from it, and not because we're noble creatures, but because you second-coming fuckwits have a hard-on for the Jews legitimately possessing Jerusalem, even though the Arabs have far more claim to it, so your fucked up end-times prophecy can come true.
You don't hate Jews because you think the Israeli regime is totally fucked up. You don't have to support their fucking illegal settlement building in order to support them and their right to exist.
One of Obama's last acts was to *finally* earn an iota of respect back from the rest of the world by acknowledging that the Israelis are breaking the fucking UN mandate, and hence international law, after decades of preventing that declaration from coming to a vote.
Back in November there was a poll of over 100, million people you seem exceptionally willing to discount it.
I... don't know where to start.
That poll had a pretty clear winner. It wasn't trump.
He may have won the election as a whole based upon America's goofy slavery-era electoral system, but he certainly didn't win any poll.
Why do people like you say such stupid shit? Are you truly so intellectually weak, or just highly manipulative? I wish I knew you in person, so I could really gauge your dysfunction.
Then there was that poll about whether or not the UK should remain in the EU
What the fuck does this have to do with anything? You think Brexiters are pro-Trump?
Brexit still has plurality support in polls in Britain, today.
You know who doesn't? Donald Trump. Let's see what they say...
Donald Trump will be a good president: 15%
Donald Trump will be a bad president: 53%
Donald Trump as president makes the world a safer place: 10%
Donald Trump as president makes the world a more dangerous place: 66%
Donald Trump's victory is a welcome disruption from 'politics as usual': 26%
Donald Trump's victory sets a dangerous precedent for future elections: 58%
Can you just tell me why you're so full of shit? Did your parents teach you nothing of integrity? Have you bullshit your entire way through life?
I can't tell if you're dishonest, or just a fucking moron.
Frankly, I don't give a damn. We have another 20-30 years of potential EC upsets before the demographics make a conservative victory impossible.
You have been watching the rubber stamping of his cabinet, yes? To use any phrase other than special interest, or conservative leadership's wet-dream to define any one of his selections would be a flat out misdirection if it contained any truth at all.
It's the same exact shit he does when he mocks any other person.
Yes. He likes to mock people by implying that they're disabled. Fake news? Fuck you, dude.
You and your ilk are branding anything inconvenient to you as "fake news", like the inauguration turnout. Fake news. Show picture taken from the front, not the back, that'll make my claim more legit! Because every glass looks full from below.
No, the person you were replying to was saying there was no evidence that it happened in the instance cited by the person HE was replying to, which is 100% right (in fact, genetically speaking, it appears the Clovis "won" any kind of struggle that may have happened, even if their culture changed or ended)
So you can jam your assertion of my racism and incorrectness right up your ass.
I'm not disagreeing with anything you said... People do get "pushed out". But evaluating cultural shifts (changes in the way groups of people do things) doesn't imply anyone being pushed out or not, and this is the case with Clovis and Folsom. Another good example is Rome an Greece.
The "Who knew ... just another kind of Native Americans?" junk is particularly stupid. The people called "Native Americans" today are just the descendants (ignoring how many of them are also descended from Europeans, sometimes proportionally more so than from non-Europeans) of the most recent waves of migration to the Americas from Eurasia [wikipedia.org]. It's rarely mentioned how these later waves likely destroyed previous cultures in the Americas, such as the Clovis people [wikipedia.org],
Clovis and Folsum were "cultures," not races of people. There is precisely zero evidence that anybody "wiped out" the Clovis culture.
because that wouldn't fit with the leftist narrative of today's "Native Americans" being perpetual victims.
Heeeeere we go. A typing toolshed. Cool.
Like I said about the taxes... I don't think I'm smart to really see all angles of the vast amount of things that would affect... I'm just certain that a tax on... let's call it planetary carbon redistribution... would have a much larger effect against the externalized costs of a coal plant vs. that of a windmill.
I'm definitely not on the side of any of the proposed economic solutions, but the argument that the true cost of fossil power when externalized costs are factored in makes it the least appealing form of energy available at this point in time seems to hold a lot of water for me, hence I'm inclined to agree that a taxation against such things would definitely raise their cost a lot more than their competition's.
I have a few questions for you. What do you think windmills are made of?
I have one question for you- what do you think coal power plants are made of, and what is it exactly that you think they burn every day to keep producing that power?
Overall- I just can't wrap my head around the economics of taxation's total effect on the system, but i'm quite sure any coal power plant worth its salt dumps many "windmills" per day of CO2 into the atmosphere, efficiently sucked from the depths of the earth's deepest and most stable carbon sink.
If I'm wrong, forgive me, but I have trouble believing I am (and couldn't find a quick and easy way to find out)
They had to build the empire in order for them to see any sun. British belief in this thing called a "sun" vanished with their empire.
Hint,
"refugees"
wasn't referring to UK asylum seekers
If "affordable" healthcare includes distributing antibiotics like tic-tacs to people whenever they whine about an infection, maybe we are avoiding the creation of new and exciting infectious bacteria by continuing to fail to provide access to anti-biotics...
Spoken like someone who has ever been on state-run medicaid. I assure you, they won't give you antibiotics until they're 5 minutes from intubating you, and I am *not* arguing for the awesomeness of that way of thinking.
Simply said, one does not coerce their medicaid doctor into giving them medications they shouldn't be given for fear of losing their money. One very easily talks their private-care doctor into giving them *just about any fucking thing they want*. You'll find this is a large factor in the US fear of abolishing private run healthcare.
I gave a direct quote from WebMD. Don't like it- too bad.
You gave an out-of-context quote from WebMD, which makes you a misleading (lying) sack of shit.
"Rhino horn is used to increase sexual virility" is also a 100% true statement, along with the other part of the sentence that says, ", though there is no scientific evidence that it is effective in this capacity". When you quote the first half without the second, it makes you a piece of shit.
We use this stuff in the field (military) all the time and it has proven to be more durable in tough environments than antibiotics and faster acting.
is a lie. What does it say for your point when you blindly agree with any point in its favor, real or invented?
When resistance can be a simple reconfiguration of a protein on their cell membrane that was already otherwise not-required for their basic life functions, it costs them nothing at all to be resistant.
One shouldn't look at it as a problem if them having to actively defend against antibiotics, the burden of hurting them is entirely on the ability of the antibiotics to target them. Change happens naturally over time for any species, we're simply applying selective pressure for change that erases the bullseye(s) that antibiotics aim at.
I'm told rhino horn is highly effective as well. BRB, gotta make myself some colloidal silver. I've learned that medical literature claiming it is a weak-at-best antibiotic is just trying to keep me paying for expensive designer antibiotics. It's actually super strong. That's why less people died from infections back in the day vs. today. Thanks for cluing me into garlic. I'll help convince the CDC that these things work for aggressive bacterial infections. Stupid libtards and their regulated drugs.
Well, we can't maintain our per-capita productivity, and hence our economic standing in the world without antibiotics, so there's that. But ya, burgers are important, too.
Been there, done that. Younger, no health insurance. Didn't want to waste money by going to the doctor. Had no idea strep could progress to infect your ears, sinuses, and anything else up in your head. Woke up one night, couldn't breathe anymore.
I don't fuck with infections anymore
Some basic analysis of his reply and the comment he replied to suggests he was mocking the claim that Medicaid (overuse of the antibiotics in humans) is the problem, not overuse of antibiotics.
Because mosquitos and ticks are admired by Monsanto.
Unsurprising that the sociopath executives running the joint admire themselves
Oh my shit- that's brilliant.
I can play that game too, you piece of intellectually dishonest piece of shit.
Here- 222% more people voted for Hillary than voted for conservative candidates.
Sure, in the GE, Hilary was their only blue option, and sure, *twice* as many people voted in the GE, but ya. A more fair assessment of the popular vote tally would be that you're a fucking piece of shit spreading really bad logic in an effort to murder innocent brain cells around you trying to actually understand how it all works.
Obviously the people didn't prefer Clinton - the majority did not vote for her.
It doesn't matter whether they did or not- I mean, the argument that they did, given her very obvious plurality, is a lot better than your shit ass argument.. but that isn't relevant. You keep moving the goal posts to make your lame ass argument hold water, but unfortunately that boat is shot to all shit.
You claim you were pointing out that he was lying for saying Clinton won a majority... Only he didn't say that.
I point that out. You then call me a liar for speaking to that fact. I'm so fucking sorry you exist. You're killing this country. You really are. I hope you see that some day. You're a disease.
I've been waiting for this post the entire thread. Thank you
Absolutely. Since the dawn of verbal communication, I'm fairly certain that almost every single one of us has realized just how uncommon it is- after all, we're the only ones who have it.