Slashdot Mirror


User: Jesufication

Jesufication's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
8
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 8

  1. Re:Forward thinkers on When the Senate Tried To Ban Dial Telephones · · Score: 0

    There's a "skip bagging" button. Don't blame the fact that you don't understand simple technology and shoplifted as a result on the store.

  2. Re:That pretty much nails it on the head. on Taxes, Second Life and Warcraft · · Score: 0

    That -is- an interesting thought, but seeing as you can't buy gold from Blizzard either, I don't think it's a taxable asset if the courts take the ToS into account because there's no determinable monetary value of the gold itself.

  3. Re:That pretty much nails it on the head. on Taxes, Second Life and Warcraft · · Score: 0

    I would hope that they'd take the ToS into account when they made the ruling, but I see your point.

  4. Re:That pretty much nails it on the head. on Taxes, Second Life and Warcraft · · Score: 0

    The problem with WoW is that it's against the Terms of Service to sell gold. I'm no lawyer, but I would assume that by violating the ToS, you technically forfeit any ownership of the gold and therefore don't really have a right to anything of value. I guess that's only if you get caught, though.

  5. Re:That pretty much nails it on the head. on Taxes, Second Life and Warcraft · · Score: 0

    I didn't RTFA, but since it's against the ToS to sell WoW's gold, I would assume that making WoW gold falls under the category of personal activity. If we were talking about Second Life, however, where the in-game currency has a direct exchange rate into dollars, that falls under the commercial category.

  6. Re:Same Thing... Different Day on The Videogame Industry is Broken · · Score: 0

    That would be true if it weren't for the fact that recording equipment is getting cheaper and artists have the Internet for distribution. Whereas making games is getting more expensive, making music is getting less so.

  7. Re:Personal responsibility loses again on The .XXX Saga Continues in Wellington · · Score: 0

    How is this a troll?

  8. Personal responsibility loses again on The .XXX Saga Continues in Wellington · · Score: 0, Troll

    Using the "We need this to protect our children from pornography" argument is utter crap. If you want to protect your kids from smut, sit down with them and help with with their homework. Restrict their internet access. If you don't trust your kids enough to stay away from things you don't think they should see, that's your problem, not the rest of the worlds. Step up, parents.