In the U.S.? You are not aware that the population of the U.S. is increasing not due to birth, but due to immigration? Yes, many people still want to come here despite how terrible it is.
That didn't fix anything. It took a joke that almost all of us got, and turned it into a straight question - a straight question that is no more likely to yield a correct answer that the joke did.
2000 *is* in the '00's, not the nineties. Nonetheless, it is also in the twentieth century, not the twenty-first century. A century is a hundred years starting whenever you decide it starts, but 'the sixties", for example are a set of years, ending in "sixty-something", so obviously 1959 or 1970 could not be a part of them.
They are not using it as identification. They are using to check your credit history, and if they hire you they need it to withhold and pay taxes, etc. I would expect them to want a birth certificate, driver's license, passport, or the like as ID.
No, I was thinking of Leslie Nielsen in Police Squad (a funny police movie) being much funnier than Steve Guttenberg in Police Academy (another funny police movie). Also, see my other comment (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2353746&cid=36915366).
Yes, and in the case of covalent bonds, or hydrogen bonds, breaking bonds is not ionizing anything, so what is your point? DNA is not an ionic solid, in case you are confused about that. In fact, I'll say that there are *no* ionic solids in the human body under normal conditions (i.e. you didn't just eat some table salt which has not yet fully dissolved in your mouth), just to be safe.
No it doesn't. The term 'visible light' refers to a particular, defined wavelength range of electromagnetic radiation, not whether or not some animals eye is capable of detecting it.
Slashdot Mirror
Satire detector not working so well today?
The best don't want anything to do with the political system.
In the U.S.? You are not aware that the population of the U.S. is increasing not due to birth, but due to immigration? Yes, many people still want to come here despite how terrible it is.
Probably not lazy. Probably logged out to make the pedantic post, to avoid the negative mod points, of course.
By weight (or by number of atoms), oxygen is more abundant in rock than silicon. FYI.
That didn't fix anything. It took a joke that almost all of us got, and turned it into a straight question - a straight question that is no more likely to yield a correct answer that the joke did.
2000 *is* in the '00's, not the nineties. Nonetheless, it is also in the twentieth century, not the twenty-first century. A century is a hundred years starting whenever you decide it starts, but 'the sixties", for example are a set of years, ending in "sixty-something", so obviously 1959 or 1970 could not be a part of them.
Sumimasen, watashi wa wakarimasen.
Well, it's safe to say that I will not live forever, thus I cannot violate such a law.
We have to bottle up the heat and shoot it into outer space on rockets.
But what if it said:
Artor3's To Do List, 3.5 stars, 150k downloads
oGMo's To Do List, 4.5 stars, 20k downloads
Then which one would they go for?
I don't disagree with your point, I'm genuinely curious, and I don't expect you to have an answer.
The scanners have been adjusted for radiation levels
Oh, really? How did they do that?
The showing a "cartoon" software change has been done to SOME scanners, not all, AFAIK.
They are not using it as identification. They are using to check your credit history, and if they hire you they need it to withhold and pay taxes, etc. I would expect them to want a birth certificate, driver's license, passport, or the like as ID.
That's googol, not Google.
Because NoScript is doing evil?
Somebody in China is going to innovate eventually. Someone's got to.
Hopefully things like this: http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/441/when-patents-attack will help.
He didn't mean ridiculous. He meant redicutonic, as in, "This broccoli is redicutonic. Have you got any that's more brassicaceous?"
No, I was thinking of Leslie Nielsen in Police Squad (a funny police movie) being much funnier than Steve Guttenberg in Police Academy (another funny police movie). Also, see my other comment (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2353746&cid=36915366).
Yes, and in the case of covalent bonds, or hydrogen bonds, breaking bonds is not ionizing anything, so what is your point?
DNA is not an ionic solid, in case you are confused about that. In fact, I'll say that there are *no* ionic solids in the human body under normal conditions (i.e. you didn't just eat some table salt which has not yet fully dissolved in your mouth), just to be safe.
No it doesn't. The term 'visible light' refers to a particular, defined wavelength range of electromagnetic radiation, not whether or not some animals eye is capable of detecting it.
Breaking bonds != ionizing.
So is UV 'B' ionizing radiation?
See the problem with your argument now?
Except when it's not.
Either way, he's probably not going to work tomorrow, right?