Of course he was. Obviously, you used inferior RG-5 cables. Had you used better ones you might have avoided the intermodulation distortion which blurred your picture and made him look like George Gaynes.
Well, being under new ownership one might expect things to get better (or worse). I don't know, just a possibility. A lot of people have this software on their laptops and desktops so it might be significant.
So you also agree that it's not *lack of* R&D. It might be the *wrong* R&D, or a change in design philosophy, or something else entirely, but not a lack of R&D.
Steve Guttenberg was amusing in the Police Academy movies (though not nearly as good as Leslie Nielsen), but why should I trust him for advice about audio gear?
Not only that , but how can a lack of R&D be to blame for a decline in sound quality? If audio quality failed to improve, you could blame it on lack of R&D, but there's got to be more to it than that for quality to *degrade* over time. With NO R&D AT ALL, at the least we should have exactly AS GOOD sound as "your dad's thirty-year-old stereo".
"Whomever" was used correctly the second time around, but there is a comma splice/run-on sentence. In any case, since the sentence in question began with "Gotta", I sincerely doubt the poster gives a rip about your concern.
"Do no evil" , BTW, was not created by marketing people, or originally intended as marketing. An engineer came up with it as a replacement of a more complex set of rules about how to behave, for internal use at Google, and people liked it for its simplicity, so they adopted it. It took on an external role later, I suppose.
As for me, I prefer sedimentary software that accretes little bits of code over many years, or igneous software that erupts, molten and sulfurous, from a glowing fissure in the earth's crust, then freezes into brittle glass-like applications.
When an individual does it, they are a deadbeat; when a corporation does it [they are also a deadbeat, but] they get a bailout and the CEO gets a huge bonus.
Is more to my liking. As much pizza as I would like to eat, I still can't get up to "too big to fail" size.
kW are not proper units for momentum. In any case, the thing you're talking about is force, not momentum. F (of the photon flux) = m (of the spacecraft) * a (of the spacecraft). (I believe you know this, but for the sake of other physics-challenged/.ers...) My question is, why would the photon flux have a preferred direction? Is the RTG shielded asymmetrically?
Huh. Really. Just the other day I told a friend was in Springfield and couldn't come help him move, and he said "Where is that?" and I said "Just Google it, you lazy bastard!" That shut him up!
That's ridiculous. That negates any and all ethics by just making whatever heinous activity one can imagine into a scientific activity. I want to cut the heads off of live puppies as soon as they are born to study the effect on the mother's milk production. I'm curious about that.
Don't even need to go anywhere. Just listen to the radio or watch TV. "INVENTORY REDUCTION SALE!" "WE'VE GOT TO MAKE ROOM!" "OUR LOT IS BURSTING AT THE SEAMS WITH NEW SUBARUS!"
(All caps for the reason that they really are yelling)
It's even smaller than a 5 1/4" floppy to be precise, since CD format is 120mm / 25.4 mm/in = 4.72". Can you imagine?: "Please insert disc 372,685 of 399,999"
Slashdot Mirror
Of course he was. Obviously, you used inferior RG-5 cables. Had you used better ones you might have avoided the intermodulation distortion which blurred your picture and made him look like George Gaynes.
Well, being under new ownership one might expect things to get better (or worse). I don't know, just a possibility. A lot of people have this software on their laptops and desktops so it might be significant.
So you also agree that it's not *lack of* R&D. It might be the *wrong* R&D, or a change in design philosophy, or something else entirely, but not a lack of R&D.
That makes more sense than lack of R&D.
Making things cheaper, smaller, lighter all could do it.
Steve Guttenberg was amusing in the Police Academy movies (though not nearly as good as Leslie Nielsen), but why should I trust him for advice about audio gear?
Not only that , but how can a lack of R&D be to blame for a decline in sound quality?
If audio quality failed to improve, you could blame it on lack of R&D, but there's got to be more to it than that for quality to *degrade* over time.
With NO R&D AT ALL, at the least we should have exactly AS GOOD sound as "your dad's thirty-year-old stereo".
Well, that is a hard habit to break.
On Saturn, people live to be two hundred and five. Going back to Saturn, where the air is clean....
Anybody know what song this is from?
"Whomever" was used correctly the second time around, but there is a comma splice/run-on sentence.
In any case, since the sentence in question began with "Gotta", I sincerely doubt the poster gives a rip about your concern.
"Do no evil" , BTW, was not created by marketing people, or originally intended as marketing. An engineer came up with it as a replacement of a more complex set of rules about how to behave, for internal use at Google, and people liked it for its simplicity, so they adopted it. It took on an external role later, I suppose.
Polymorphic and metamorphic malware.
As for me, I prefer sedimentary software that accretes little bits of code over many years, or igneous software that erupts, molten and sulfurous, from a glowing fissure in the earth's crust, then freezes into brittle glass-like applications.
When an individual does it, they are a deadbeat; when a corporation does it [they are also a deadbeat, but] they get a bailout and the CEO gets a huge bonus.
Is more to my liking.
As much pizza as I would like to eat, I still can't get up to "too big to fail" size.
kW are not proper units for momentum. /.ers...)
In any case, the thing you're talking about is force, not momentum.
F (of the photon flux) = m (of the spacecraft) * a (of the spacecraft).
(I believe you know this, but for the sake of other physics-challenged
My question is, why would the photon flux have a preferred direction? Is the RTG shielded asymmetrically?
If you have to ask, you've just told us which one you are...
Hey, if you can make your own DS, maybe Nintendo will hire you!
Dear UAC (uninformed AC),
Siemens makes the PLCs, not the centrifuges.
Where "very early 70's" means before 1979. A strange definition of 'very early'.
Huh. Really. Just the other day I told a friend was in Springfield and couldn't come help him move, and he said "Where is that?" and I said "Just Google it, you lazy bastard!" That shut him up!
That's ridiculous. That negates any and all ethics by just making whatever heinous activity one can imagine into a scientific activity.
I want to cut the heads off of live puppies as soon as they are born to study the effect on the mother's milk production. I'm curious about that.
Nope, it's not true. Maybe it was for a short time, but not anymore.
Ethics is an important part of Science.
it shouldn't be.
It is not PART of science. It is a separate and necessary entity that should guide what we do *in and with science*.
The second derivative of PCs sold over time is negative?
Don't even need to go anywhere. Just listen to the radio or watch TV.
"INVENTORY REDUCTION SALE!" "WE'VE GOT TO MAKE ROOM!" "OUR LOT IS BURSTING AT THE SEAMS WITH NEW SUBARUS!"
(All caps for the reason that they really are yelling)
It's even smaller than a 5 1/4" floppy to be precise, since CD format is 120mm / 25.4 mm/in = 4.72".
Can you imagine?: "Please insert disc 372,685 of 399,999"
Yes, but
1.0+
1.03 +
1.061+
.
.
+1.305 (1.03^10)
=11.464
which is more than
1+
1+
.
.
(9x)
+1.6
=10.6
Thing is, people, especially children, rarely die from broken bones, so "death machines" is hyperbole, at the least.