Slashdot Mirror


Saudi Arabia Constructing World's Tallest Building

kkleiner writes "1,000 meters, or 3,280 feet. That's two-thirds of a mile. When the Kingdom Tower is built on the outskirts of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia it will not only become the tallest building in the world, it will shatter the old record. The total cost for the tower is approximately $1.2 billion. It features a Four Seasons hotel, Four Seasons serviced apartments, luxury condominiums, top class office space and the world's highest observatory."

225 comments

  1. prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comments about someone flying a plane into it, coming in 3... 2... 1....

    1. Re:prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This one will be built by the bin Laden group, nice

    2. Re:prediction by Fned · · Score: 1

      Only if it's the world's biggest airplane.

    3. Re:prediction by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      saudi arabians = bin Laden group? americans = ___ : you fill in the blank (pun not intended but that works too)

    4. Re:prediction by wsxyz · · Score: 2

      The contract to construct the building was signed with The Bin Laden Group, a Saudi Arabian construction firm.

      hierophanta = _______ : fill in the blank...

    5. Re:prediction by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      The money will go to the Bin Laden group, the building will actually be built by lots of underpaid, ill-treated slave-like migrants. Saudis aren't big on doing actual work themselves. The design won't be Saudi either, I bet.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    6. Re:prediction by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      saudi arabians = bin Laden group?

      When the group of Saudis are in fact the family of Osama bin Laden, and use the official name "Binladen Group" for conducting business, then yes, that is true. The Bin Laden Group is a company that is a major investor in the tower and likly to do a large portion of the work constructing it. So yes, the Saudis in question have direct ties to Osama bin Laden. Perhaps you should read a little more next time before demonstrating that you are an ignorant ass in public (as so many ignorant asses are wont to do, perhaps that's one of the features that makes their ignorance more than just run of the mill ignorance and instead up to the "ignorant ass" level of ignorance. But thanks for reminding us of that.

  2. Pumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The next time you go at the pump, think about that !

    1. Re:Pumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Are they planning on moving the building to Calgary after they build it?

    2. Re:Pumping by magarity · · Score: 1

      The next time you go at the pump, think about that !

      The consolation is that a US firm was paid to design it for them.

    3. Re:Pumping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not the war for oil?

  3. observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    isn't the middle of a city a bad place for an observatory with all the light pollution and whatnot?

    1. Re:observatory by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      TFA says its being built on the outskirts of Jeddah, so depending on how far out they mean by "outskirts", the light pollution may be manageable.

      The bigger issue, I think, is that this is basically a giant vanity project that will probably end up like the Burj Khalifa: Deep in debt with rapidly falling rents and tons of empty space. Jeddah is right next to Mecca, so they probably won't have a lot of trouble filling it with rich foreign Muslims during the Hajj, but it seems like it would be a bit of a challenge during other parts of the year. I guess the Saudis have enough money to burn on crap like this, but it seems they could find a more intelligent way to invest in their own country other than building giant luxury hotels.

    2. Re:observatory by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The most prominent ruin-to-be from the height of the empire, the days of peak oil. Give it 50 years and the few rag-clad scavengers populating the lower levels will wonder what the fuck anyone thought when they built this....

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    3. Re:observatory by magarity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      isn't the middle of a city a bad place for an observatory with all the light pollution and whatnot?

      I think they mean observatory as in "a place to look out and observe". Not an astronomical observatory.

    4. Re:observatory by LoP_XTC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The most prominent ruin-to-be from the height of the empire, the days of peak oil. Give it 50 years and the few rag-clad scavengers populating the lower levels will wonder what the fuck anyone thought when they built this....

      Brings to mind the Aztechnology building from Shadowrun. C*O's and filthy rich at the top, and the just plain filthy at the bottom.

      --
      "Curiouser and Curiouser...." -Alice
    5. Re:observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, comparing the Saudi economy to the American economy, and their national debts, maybe they don't need any advice from the US.

    6. Re:observatory by Sperbels · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think they mean an astronomical observatory. I believe it's just a deck where people can view the surrounding land. An astronomical observatory wouldn't be very useful on top of a building even a quarter of that height. Not only do you have to contend with light pollution, and regular pollution, but those buildings sway so much that you couldn't possibly get an exposure of any significant duration.

    7. Re:observatory by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 0

      That appears to be the master plan, seeing the spread between filthy rich and just plain filthy getting bigger and bigger as of late. Also, I need to find me a Shadowrun game again... ;)

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    8. Re:observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is basically a giant vanity project

      More to the point, it's a giant penis. Yes those arabs are in love with the phallus. Now if only they could find a goat big enough...

    9. Re:observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think they mean an astronomical observatory. I believe it's just a deck where people can view the surrounding land.

      Wow! Look at all that sand!

    10. Re:observatory by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Funny

      The US economy is like someone who goes to work every day, and maxes his credit card with shiny toys, and uses a big chunk of his paycheck to make the minimum interest payment. The Saudi economy is like someone who finds a chest full of gold in their garden and lives by spending it on the most expensive things they can find until it runs out. Neither is particularly healthy, but the former has better long-term prospects.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:observatory by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2

      Yeah, all the jobs created by the construction and then the running of the building and all the tourist monies are of no use to anyone.

    12. Re:observatory by hierophanta · · Score: 1

      i thought so too - but chicago has a huge observatory downtown. i dont think that it matters all that much with the equipment is used

    13. Re:observatory by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      Modded funny 'cuz it's true!

    14. Re:observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if only they could find a goat big enough...

      http://goatse.bz/

    15. Re:observatory by ebh · · Score: 1

      $1.2 billion, huh? Maybe the US could find a more intelligent way to invest in their own country other than building stadiums (the new Yankee Stadium cost $1.5 billion).

    16. Re:observatory by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      The stadiums are probably more profitable, though. Certainly, they are of greater value to the average citizen.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    17. Re:observatory by Dunbal · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You just don't get the idea of "bread and circuses" at all, do you? It's not about common sense. It's about getting votes. There are more poor people that rich people (so more votes from the poor), more uneducated people than educated people (so more votes from the uneducated). Populism works for the politicians, until the whole system is destroyed because it made no sense.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    18. Re:observatory by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Broken window, anyone?

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    19. Re:observatory by dbIII · · Score: 1

      By the literal definition peak oil was in 2007 because production is lower now than it was then (mainly becuase consumption went down). Other people add their own baggage to the term and argue based on whatever strawman they've built.
      The real problem is when demand is a lot greater than production - depending on whether that happens gradually or quickly determines whether we are truly screwed or if nearly everything just gets a lot more expensive than it was a few years before.

      As for the tower - I can almost understand something like it in New York or Tokyo where land costs a fortune, but this thing just sounds like a collossal wank like the pyongyang hotel.

    20. Re:observatory by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      Really? I just did some searching for astronomical observatories in downtown Chicago and could not find any.

      Do you have a reference? Maybe I missed it.

    21. Re:observatory by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more of Hive Primus in Necromunda. Good times.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    22. Re:observatory by Stone2065 · · Score: 1

      Not much light pollution at a kilometer up...

      --
      Stone
    23. Re:observatory by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      You're not referring to Adler Planetarium, are you? Big difference between a planetarium and an observatory.

    24. Re:observatory by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      I would anticipate that there will be a certain number of suites and apartments bought, but they will not be occupied as they will have been purchased as investment properties - pure speculation. However the fact that the place appears unoccupied will deter further investment and thus it will grind to a halt. Either way, I will be *very* surprised if it meets the expectations of it's developers.

      One need only look to Dubai to see a business case for *not* building it. But I guess the Saudis have the money, so I say go for it; as I'm into urban exploration I encourage this as future UE enthusiasts will have the ultimate explore.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
    25. Re:observatory by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia isn't a democracy though.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  4. Not two thirds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3280 feet / 5280 ft*mile^-1 != 2/3

    1. Re:Not two thirds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3280 / 5280 = .62... Which is close enough to 2/3 to satisfy me.

      Of course, I'm perfectly happy estimating a meter as 3 feet. (or calling 45 minutes a half hour, for that matter)

    2. Re:Not two thirds by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      It's not too far from 2/3. (1.86)/3 is more accurate, if you want to stick with thirds.

      5/8 is the fraction I would have used, seeing as anyone who runs track in the U.S. knows that 1600m is about 1 mile.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    3. Re:Not two thirds by master5o1 · · Score: 3

      In work time sheets, I prefer to call 45 minutes an hour.

      --
      signature is pants
    4. Re:Not two thirds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more often dealing with "How long till we get home?", lately. And I prefer to underestimate there.

  5. Prediction of epSos.de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before somebody asks.
    Yes, It will run Crisis !!!

  6. HOOOOLY SHIT by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    That's nearly twice as tall as the Burj Khalifa according to the graphic in TFA 8-(

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by demonbug · · Score: 2

      That's nearly twice as tall as the Burj Khalifa according to the graphic in TFA 8-(

      Nah, only about 500 feet (or 20%) taller.

    2. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by adonoman · · Score: 1

      The graphic is showing the new tower at 1 mile, not one km. In that case it would be twice as tall.

    3. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah I see. Looks like they did their graphic wrong.

      I was searching to double-check the height and it was originally planned to be 1 mile tall but they had to scale back, so I guess the graphic was based on the original height.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      There doesn't seem to be much agreement on exactly how tall it will be. Google results vary between 1 kilometer, 1 mile, and "1000-meter-plus ... a closely guarded secret".

      Guess we'll just have to wait and find out.

    5. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look at the graphic again. It clearly lists the Burj Khalifa as 512m.

      GameboyRMH's statement is purely accurate. According to the "graphic", it is nearly twice as tall.

      Of course, the next next to the graphic lists the Burj Khalifa as 828m, which is the correct value.

      The whole article is badly written, IMO.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    6. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the only conclusion we can safely draw is that Faisal has a tiny weenie.

    7. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by wagnerrp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. It's a closely guarded secret, lest someone else design and construct another tower from scratch, in less time than it takes them to construct, and makes it one foot taller, stealing their thunder. That should eliminate any doubt as to whether this is anything more than a giant architectural penis.

    8. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the graphic the new building will be 3 times as tall. 512m to 1600m. They should have taken a closer look at it before pasting it to the article.

    9. Re:HOOOOLY SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of it's sustainable anyway. I immediately ignored it and went to something more interesting at the bottom of the page - a sustainable city project. An actual city of the future with it's transportation city of the future, and green energy sustained, and planned.

      Sadly, that has been scaled back. I often find these pilot projects for new ways of living are targets of the establishment. They cannot allow their oil oligarchy to be overtaken. Architecture itself, everywhere and I mean everywhere, is uninspiring for the same reason. I can never be a city that feels like it has a certain style of the future. It will always be an ego-driven tower, built right next to a ghetto. It's just an oasis of denial that can never really look good, no matter how nice the building, as it doesn't match the surroundings.

      Real design of the future will be cities where there is a clear relationship between the buildings, the transportation system, and the environment. They won't necessarily be high. Were the pyramids that high?

      I honestly can't think of a single structure in this world that would inspire me. I'm not a slave driver from a slave-driver pushing part of the world. Bright lights don't inspire me. Concrete jungles don't make me feel brand new.

      Man doesn't imitate nature, at least not in any way that isn't half-assed, and nature is the only thing that inspires me in this world, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who feels this way. Machu Pichu and some other ancient sire in the world inspire somewhat but they have not been equaled by man, not even close.

  7. Compensating for something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:Compensating for something? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Yes. A total lack of concern for the welfare of the people of the world, whom they're reaming on energy prices and threatening to enslave with their idiot religion.

    2. Re:Compensating for something? by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You should check out what they are doing to their own subjects, makes their relationship to the rest of the world look downright friendly.

    3. Re:Compensating for something? by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take heart - there's a theory about skyscrapers that states that when a society starts building really big ones it's only a dozen or so years away from bankruptcy.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:Compensating for something? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the timing, but the idea is sound.

      The idea being, if there was anywhere else worth investing the money, nobody would create a hyperexpensive cash sink like that.

      I think the failure of humanity in this regard is that we allow it to happen, instead of immediately confiscating the cash and giving it to people who can use it to create demand that, for everyone else, would be worth investing to supply.

    5. Re:Compensating for something? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      And, as a counterpoint, the Rockefeller Center, which was started during the great depression and has been an example for people making large capital investments ever since. If you build during a recession, you get lots of cheap labour and then have a big building that you can rent out when the economy recovers. Looking at the wikipedia example, it seems that it works very well if you cherry pick your examples, but it's just as easy to cherry pick counterexamples (recessions with no skyscrapers, skyscrapers not followed by recessions).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Compensating for something? by Pyrion · · Score: 1

      The idea being, if there was anywhere else worth investing the money, nobody would create a hyperexpensive cash sink like that.

      Except for China. Anyone could come up with a good long list of shit they could improve, but instead they build entire cities that damn near nobody can afford to live in just to make their annual GDP growth percentages look good.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    7. Re:Compensating for something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your religion is mostly likely capitalism practiced more virulently than any other religion in history

    8. Re:Compensating for something? by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

      Your religion is mostly likely capitalism, practiced more virulently than any other religion in history.

      With the exception of grammar-nazism

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    9. Re:Compensating for something? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      That's why their model is no good.

      It's less amenable to robber-barons, but their surreal attitude towards pricing makes it less amenable to everyone.

      America needs less laissez-faire, but not that much less.

  8. Man I thought that said "Klingon" Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /disappointed

  9. Interesting by tool462 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I assume they're building it on the site of the old Tower of Babel, as a memorial to those who lost their lives there some 6000 years ago...

    1. Re:Interesting by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it's a bit of architect's humor that the Burj Khalifa's sections hint at a conical tower with a spiralled path on the outside like the traditional depictions of the Tower of Babel.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Interesting by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Merde! Je comprends pas ce que tool462 a écrit!

    3. Re:Interesting by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Well, that is the classic Ziggurath design that inspired the whole Tower of Babel story. Mostly useless, ritualistic mega-structures, the only use being the observatory post on top to watch the stars and determine the seasons - which could have been done with much less crap around it. I don't think the architect aimed at the Tower story as such, but rather cited the Ziggurath as classical structure of the region.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    4. Re:Interesting by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 1

      That was in Missouri...

      --
      We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
    5. Re:Interesting by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Ziggurats usually have terraced sides and a set of stairs (if anything) to get to the top, not the same thing as a spiral path, although they have kind of a similar look. The sections of the Burj Khalifa have offset heights like parts of a spiral path, and I can't think of any historical structure with a spiral path winding to the top.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Interesting by PRMan · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to the Biblical account, nobody lost their lives. They just all started speaking different languages.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    7. Re:Interesting by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Tidak apa apa.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:Interesting by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Absolutely true about the details - but I was rather thinking of the impression. The same thing that made the GP think of Tower of Babel made me immediately think of Zigguraths, and I rather believe that this was what the architect wanted to evoke. But, in the end, that's only speculation - haven't heard any statement from him. Just seems more natural as source for an architectural citation.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    9. Re:Interesting by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 1

      I get the humour, but the tower of Babel was supposed to have been located in Mesopotamia - i.e modern Iraq

      --

      There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    10. Re:Interesting by treeves · · Score: 0

      Sumimasen, watashi wa wakarimasen.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any historical structure with a spiral path winding to the top.

      See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Mosque_of_Samarra

    12. Re:Interesting by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Huh, you learn something every day...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    13. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume they're building it on the site of the old Tower of Babel, as a memorial to those who lost their lives there some 6000 years ago...

      Non-fictional citation needed.

    14. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going from being a unified people constructing mega projects to a splintered collection of factions unable to communicate, the tower of babel account effectively describes the post flood reemergence of war. Thus it could be blamed for all war related deaths from then until now.

    15. Re:Interesting by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      The spiral path is to redirect wind force.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    16. Re:Interesting by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      And you have to take it from an AC... ;) Color me educamated, too. I was not consciously aware of that mosque, though it stirs some memory - wasn't it shown at some point in a Civilization game?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    17. Re:Interesting by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      You lost all credibility to this discussion at "post flood".

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    18. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody is stated to have lost their lives.

      But if the morning after babble, I show up to collect my pay early and leave town with the other guys I can still understand (cause it's obvious this project's going nowhere now) and my boss tries to tell me he can't pay me yet cause the gold doesn't come in 'till Friday, only he's speaking Japanese, something tells me one of us is losing our life.

    19. Re:Interesting by Abreu · · Score: 1

      No entiendo ni puta madres... qué chingaos dicen?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    20. Re:Interesting by unchiujar · · Score: 1

      Ce naiba discuta astia aici ?

      --
      Shakespeare poems - infinite monkeys with infinite time.Computer tech support - a few trained ones working from 9 to 5.
    21. Re:Interesting by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if it's a bit of architect's humor that the Burj Khalifa's sections hint at a conical tower with a spiralled path on the outside like the traditional depictions of the Tower of Babel."

      Humor? It would have to be a rather sick sense of humor.

      If you think about it for a bit, there is a logical conclusion to this "race to build the tallest..."--eventually all of us get to watch the tallest building in the world fall over. Doe's anyone really think that risks won't be taken in order to build the next "tallest building"? The margin for error slowly erodes with each incremental increase in height, and the architects know it, yet they keep designing and building. Being a part of that must feel something akin to working on the Trinity project--the possibility of a major fuck-up is quite real, but hey, what the hell, let's go for it. How many people can you fit in one of these things anyways?

      You know what they saw about falling giants...the taller they are, the further everyone else has to run to get the fuck out of the way...or something like that.

    22. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credibility? In a discussion about the tower of babel?

    23. Re:Interesting by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1
    24. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HÃh? Ei tajuu.

    25. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Måste vara en epidemi. Jag känner också att det är svårt att förstå vad andra skriver.

  10. Short-Sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paying foreigners to build gigantic monuments isn't a great long-term strategy. When the oil dries up how is this stuff all going to be maintained in the middle of a desert wasteland. But I guess the current kleptocracy will be dead by then and don't really care. Just seems like they could spend money employing foreigners to teach their own citizens about engineering or whatever. But when you look at Dubai and how they have to import incredible amounts of water for their fake islands... you can only imagine when there's no more oil how it's going to be totally destroyed and the dolphins will be eaten for food by roaming nomads.

    1. Re:Short-Sighted by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When the oil dries up it's going to become a playground for the hyper-rich, at least that's their plan.

      If that fails, well it'll make an awesome post-apocalyptic wasteland.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Short-Sighted by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      OTOH this could be their plan for increasing non oil (tourism) revenue

    3. Re:Short-Sighted by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If that fails, well it'll make an awesome post-apocalyptic wasteland.

      True, but who is going to want to climb that many flights of stairs to have their climactic last-stand against the zombie hordes on the observatory deck?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Short-Sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign me in!

    5. Re:Short-Sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      For the most part, the rich don't like shitty backwater Arab countries. Just ask Bahrain... They might be rich, but the vast majority of the civilized world still finds them and their horribly repressive culture fucking disgusting.

    6. Re:Short-Sighted by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      "Who the hell... puts an evac station... up three hundred flights of goddamn stairs?" - Coach, Left 4 Dead 2

    7. Re:Short-Sighted by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Zombie hordes? Come on, there needs to be some kind of big bad guy at the top. I'm thinking a cross between the Maledict and DMC4's lightning demon. Players will shit their pants.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:Short-Sighted by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      True, and the artist's rendition of the observation deck, a big round platform sticking out the side of the building, just screams "boss fight arena!"

      Inside, just before you head out onto the deck, there should be a little atrium where you can find crates full of ammunition.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    9. Re:Short-Sighted by Elbowgeek · · Score: 1

      Well as one of those hyper-rich myself, I can't wait to buy a whole floor of the place so I can enjoy the many benefits of the Kingdom:

        - Amazing views. Of sand. Lots and lots of sand. Then again, at the height my floor will be I will probably only see the curvature of the earth, but still...
        - And that's about it...

      Seriously, what is it with these insane projects? They seem to think that if they build outrageous, futuristic super-luxury developments all of the world's super-rich will suddenly flock to them. Maybe they should phone Dubai and ask how their palm thingy is doing, or that world islands bit of silliness is playing out.

      --
      Who is this delectable creature with an insatiable love of the dead?
  11. Die Hardest by mholve · · Score: 0

    Too bad Gruber bit it in the first movie. A building this tall would surely keep him and McClane pretty busy for a sequel.

    1. Re:Die Hardest by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no problem, Gruber can come from a large family..I think it's time for a hot Gruber sister to step up to face McClane as a vengeful-thief-pretending-to-be-terrorist.

    2. Re:Die Hardest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never understood why Snape didn't simply put an avedakedavra curse on Bruce Willis.

  12. Winning is everything! by CurryCamel · · Score: 1
    Stopped reading TFA after:

    At least 173 meters (568 feet) taller, sight-seers on the tower’s observation deck could see how long it takes for their spit to hit the top of Burj Khalifa (this is, if they weren’t hundreds of miles apart).

    Yes. We got it. Its taller.

  13. Large buildings in small cities by JTsyo · · Score: 2

    Is it just me or do these super high skyscrapers look out of place when the surrounding buildings are so small? It seems they are more concerned about the record than the overall skyline. I also wonder if western tourist would be well received there.

    1. Re:Large buildings in small cities by royallthefourth · · Score: 1

      Four Seasons isn't counting on western tourists too much anymore; they're increasingly serving Chinese patrons.

    2. Re:Large buildings in small cities by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I imagine tourism is the reason they are building the thing. Other Arab countries are already way ahead of them because they know eventually the oil money will run out. Dubai has already built the worlds tallest building and apparently the Saudi's lack imagination.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Large buildings in small cities by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Trim the bush and the tree looks taller :D

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  14. Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I first read that my first thought was that they would have telescopes up there. But all they mean is an observation deck. How disappointing.

    More seriously, TFA discusses how this is part of the attempt by Saudi Arabia to move away from having an economy run off of oil. So this will have hotels and offices inside. I'm not sure that this is the best thing to do to get off of such things given how many basic problems Saudi Arabia has and how many fairly cheap things could be done to improve the education and general productivity of most of the population.

    One thing that will be an obvious issue for such a large building is the exact layout and behavior of the elevator system. Some modern tall buildings have elevators that don't have simple up and down buttons but rather have a keypad where one punches in what floor one wants to go to and then the system optimizes which elevator to send to you rather than simply sending the next available elevator in that direction. This also allows elevators to travel at faster than the amount they can deaccelerate in a single floor. There's some non-trivial math involved in making such systems, and even making them slightly more efficient can have large scale payoffs simply due to the sheer number of people. As real-estate becomes more expensive and scarce throughout the planet, we're going to need to look more and more at how pre-existing very large buildings have handled these sorts of issues. So I'm happy that we have people like the Saudis doing this now long before we really need it.

    1. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      Another big problem is the shear amount of space these mega sky scrapers make available. This single building will probably represent a 25% increase in the amount of lease-able business space in the downtown area, and it will of course come with a premium price point so that you can say you have offices in the tallest building in the world.

      Take a look at what happened to the Burj Khalifa, and how many of their spaces are sitting empty today because of a slump in their economy.

    2. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      When I first read that my first thought was that they would have telescopes up there. But all they mean is an observation deck. How disappointing.

      Yeah that didn't make much sense to me... It wouldn't even be close to the highest observatory, because those usually go on mountains which still beat the pants off our structures. And they also go as far from civilization as possible because of light pollution.

      Oh well. I still see no reason they couldn't put a reasonably big telescope on it!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building this will have a lot of spin-off jobs in the area. Why not build it in Saudi? They can increase their mechanical engineering chops and then create an economy around that.

      1.2 Billion sound like a steal, for a project of this magnitude. Hopefully they don't go too far over budget.

      My concern is: Are they going to fill it to occupancy once they build it?

    4. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does building a tower full of hotels and offices help you move away from an oil economy? When their oil is gone, what would people use that hotel and offices for?

    5. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by pz · · Score: 2

      An office-mate of mine in graduate school had worked on a predictive elevator algorithm that is found in some larger office buildings. It tracks the temporal pattern of elevator calls and tried to optimize empty car direction (up, down) and idle placement, among other things. So, for example, at 9am, the optimal action for an empty car without a pending call is to go to the ground floor since it's highly likely the next call will come from people entering the building to head to their offices. Similarly, at noon, the optimal action is to head to the middle of the building since the next call is more likely to come from someone wanting to head down to go out for lunch. Given a few minutes' worth of thought, I'm sure nearly anyone on Slashdot could come up with some very good ideas on optimizing not only empty direction and idle placement for a single car, but multiple cars as well.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    6. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that this is the best thing to do to get off of such things given how many basic problems Saudi Arabia has and how many fairly cheap things could be done to improve the education and general productivity of most of the population.

      The last thing the Saudis want is an educated populace. This is about the super rich blowing their money for fun, they do not care about the general population one iota.

    7. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My knowledge of astronomy is very limited, but as far as I know Saudi Arabia is at sea level, basically the tower will be 1000 m above the sea, isn't a mountain side observatory much better? I mean there are plenty mountains well over 1km high with none of that light pollution, and a hell of a lot cheaper.

    8. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Unkyjar · · Score: 1

      The sway that you get at the top of a skyscraper would make telescopes impractical, they'd have to constantly compensate for variation in sway due to wind.

    9. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Given a few minutes' worth of thought, I'm sure nearly anyone on Slashdot could come up with some very good ideas on optimizing not only empty direction and idle placement for a single car, but multiple cars as well.

      Shit, we can do it better. We can always do it better. That's why we're here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    10. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      No, you're completely right, it would be ridiculous to have a real scientific observatory there just for altitude and light pollution reasons. That's why it struck me as very odd.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see. Hey, maybe with the money they're throwing at it they can have such a compensation system. At least one good enough for a scope meant for tourists to look through! But yeah, seems pretty pointless. Why did they say "observatory" in the summary anyway?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Buildings this tall tend to sway in the wind, so they probably aren't suitable for a telescope.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    13. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by jc42 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't even be close to the highest observatory, because those usually go on mountains which still beat the pants off our structures. And they also go as far from civilization as possible because of light pollution. Oh well. I still see no reason they couldn't put a reasonably big telescope on it!

      Yeah; my first thought was that the Mauna Kea observatory is above 4000 meters. I looked it up, and its official "height" (;-) is 4205m.

      Anyway, there are some significant observatories functioning in or near cities, usually at universities. They just don't operate in the visual spectrum. There are parts of the spectrum for which even city air is quite transparent, such as the radio and TV portions.

      But the top of a tall building wouldn't be a very good place for a telescope, even if it were above the city's poluted-air layer. Tall buildings tend to sway a fair amount in even light winds. That would interfere seriously with long exposures, and make the software that aims the telescope incredibly difficult to get working right.

      It's a lot easier to just build on the ground, preferably at a high altitude. And it's usually a lot cheaper to build there than it would be at the top of a major skyscraper in the middle of an urban area.

      I do suspect that whoever wrote the summary/article doesn't know the difference between an observatory and an observation deck. Or doesn't care to distinguish them.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    14. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Depends how greedy the prince is. Construction costs are supposed to be only $210/square foot. ($2266/m^2), so ~$2/sq.ft./mo. seems like a reasonable price, even $3.00 for better bits. If he tries to charge too much more, very little will rent. Jeddah is not New York or Tokyo, there is plenty of land and not much demand.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    15. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Years back I knew someone who worked in Saudi Arabia for a few years. It was well paid but he and his wife had to live in a compound for foreigners most of the time. If they did get permission to go outside then his wife had to be fully covered and walk behind him etc. The compound relaxed most of the laws so they could live a more or less western lifestyle, but you soon get fed up when your whole world is a few square kilometres.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Would many people want to work at the top? I have been up tall buildings with with 50 odd floors and your ears pop due to the pressure change.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Sheer. Shear has destructive connotations.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    18. Re:Observatory doesn't mean what I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have done work in Saudi Arabia many years back and because of their culture, all the building elevators are separate for men and women. That means double the count taking up more real estate space when finally constructed.

  15. We don't need a spec by Whatsisname · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From TFA:

    The final details of Kingdom Tower’s design are yet to be worked out, but construction is to begin immediately.

    We all know how well that impacts budgets and schedules for software projects!

    1. Re:We don't need a spec by darkgrayknight · · Score: 1

      lol, ah the joys of a spec not even nailed down yet. They'll probably just end up with a walmart.

    2. Re:We don't need a spec by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      You know that it's going to need one hell of a foundation, regardless of what the finials on the tippy top look like.

    3. Re:We don't need a spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the bin Ladens are constructing it so they don't have to worry about a plane being flown in to it.

    4. Re:We don't need a spec by pz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That and there's going to be hectares upon hectares of land that need to be cleared, barracks and sundry support systems for the thousands of construction workers that need to be built along with access roads and materials staging areas. If the weight budget has been finalized, the geological surveys for the foundation and maybe even the excavation can begin.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:We don't need a spec by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      The final details of Kingdom Tower's design are yet to be worked out, but construction is to begin immediately.

      We all know how well that impacts budgets and schedules for software projects!

      budgets, schedules and outcome

      I wonder what it looks like when a building segfaults?

    6. Re:We don't need a spec by xclr8r · · Score: 2

      Actually a slumped economy is the best time to negotiate construction contracts. I know of a few universities building like mad right now.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    7. Re:We don't need a spec by uptaphunk · · Score: 1

      Actually that is a fairly common practice in agile development. You have a pretty good idea what it is going to look like but you never have the details ironed out. If they follow this paradigm - all the risky parts of the building will be spiked ahead of time.

      --
      Geeks of the World, Unite!
    8. Re:We don't need a spec by ebh · · Score: 1

      The Tacoma Narrows Bridge? Several of its segs faulted and its core dumped most egregiously.

    9. Re:We don't need a spec by braines · · Score: 1

      'fast track' construction is fairly common practice. If you have the basic Structrual, MEP and Elevatoring layouts you can get started putting in the foundations and structure at the bottom working your way up you don't necessarily need to know what the exact curtain pattern will be on floor 50 to pour the foundation in the basement. Construction could take 5-10 years, the designers just have to stay ahead of it.

    10. Re:We don't need a spec by umbrellasd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called Agile development and results in less misspending and mistakes and more building that you want.

  16. In mekka? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Parts are restricted to non-muslims. Presumably not the parts westerners buy oil but Mekka is not a city known for its openness to visitors.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  17. How many hungry people could be fed instead? by morikahnx · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wonder how many people $1.2 billion could feed. Think they'll be able to see Somalia from on top of that tall building. Could someone do the math on that?

    1. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what does it matter, our country is spending nearly that much shotting legos in space

    2. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Even at 1000 meters, you'd only be able to see about 120 km. The distance you can see over the horizon is roughly proportional to the square root of your height above the surface. To see Somalia from Jeddah, you'd have to build a 100km tall tower. If they built it to 3000m, you might be able to see northern Sudan from the peak.

      As to feeding Somalis, assuming about 1 USD / day to feed a person, you could feed all of Somalia for 4 months

    3. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by bmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Protip:

      The causes of famine are politics first, logistics second, and lack of actual food last. It's been this way for a long time. If you have warlords refusing NGOs like UNICEF, then the problem isn't spending money on a building a thousand miles away. There is plenty of food to go around. The problem is getting it there.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by kgeiger · · Score: 1

      Wonder how many people $1.2 billion could feed. Think they'll be able to see Somalia from on top of that tall building. Could someone do the math on that?

      Quite a few, especially architects, engineers, construction laborers, logistics companies, and materials suppliers. After construction, a tourist industry and thousands of support staff, maintenance technicians, office managers, and other occupants, and a large supply chain for power, water, sewer, building services, decorators, etc.

      --
      Vision with execution is hallucination.
    5. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem is getting it there

      And the difficulty increases as the accuracy of 'there' increases. It's trivial to get food to, say, Africa. It's fairly easy to get food to a specific country. Getting it to a famine site within the country is harder. Getting it to a famine site and distributing it to the people who are actually starving, rather than the ones with guns is really difficult.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:How many hungry people could be fed instead? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Correct.

  18. Towers and Recession by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1

    Building the world's tallest tower is usually followed by a recession. Oh, oh.

    --
    "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Towers and Recession by iceaxe · · Score: 1

      Also, a period of economic growth is usually followed by a recession, which is followed by another period of economic growth.

      --
      WALSTIB!
    2. Re:Towers and Recession by vux984 · · Score: 1

      We've observed that:

      a) record breaking sky scrapers don't get built in recessions.
      b) They don't get built at the beginning of economic booms.
      c) They don't get built in the middle of economic booms.
      d) They seem to go up just before the crash... sometimes they don't even get finished before the crash hits.

      Its more than just the economy is cyclical, and any event at all that you care to point at happens "before a crash". Building record breaking skyscrapers has a strong correlation with the end of a boom cycle.

      There was a real study done, and the theory has some real traction among econmists... as the economic situation that enables skyscrapers (low interest rates, burgeoning growth, space premiums, etc) are what enables record breaking sky scrapers to be economically viable... and are the same conditions that immediately precede a bust cycle.

  19. Car Parking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the penthouses will probably sell for lots of millions of {insert currency here} value

    but.....

    I bet they don't say that you will need to park your {insert name of expensive car here} up to 1km away from your front door

    1. Re:Car Parking by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, thanks to gravity, it only takes 10.1 seconds to travel that km.

    2. Re:Car Parking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      1KM is more than enough for a parachute to open, so you may find that that's a route that people on the top floors actually take when they're in a hurry. Going up may take quite a bit longer though.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  20. Right, because extravagance is unbounded by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    ...and that means extravagance should not be bounded, espeicailly in the oil-rich middle east (or Texas).
    http://guide.theemiratesnetwork.com/living/dubai/images/the_palm/palm_jumeirah.jpg

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. lot's of Tall sky building have sky lobbies where by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    You take a express elevator that stops only at the sky lobby's and then switch over to a local one (some of them have local stacked on top of each other so they don't need lot's of space for all the elevators) other places have banks of elevators that only go to one set of floors.

    The keypad system may be better for places where most of the elevators stop on all floors.

  23. "I want an Official World's Tallest Building!" by magusxxx · · Score: 1

    No, you'll put your eye out, kid."

    --
    Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
  24. A white elephant by Epeeist · · Score: 1

    So will anyone go there? If you like a drink, are female or gay, Christian or atheist is there any way you would go there unless you were forced to do so on business?

    And once the oil does run out the reasons for doing so become even more remote.

    1. Re:A white elephant by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's probably no Gideon Bible in the nightstand...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:A white elephant by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, given that there are over a billion Muslims in the world, they don't care what you think.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:A white elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but why should he go somewhere where he has to care what they think?

      The large figure you give includes all believers of convenience in states where apostasy and atheism are effectively punishable crimes, as well as those in variant sects for instance the Ahmadiyya, who are persecuted in many Muslim "countries", and so found in high number in places like the UK. Many also can not read the Qur'an, or indeed at all.

    4. Re:A white elephant by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      It could be worse. It could be like the cocaine other rich people do at private parties for the same reason. (quip about hookers' nethers here)

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    5. Re:A white elephant by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      It's also less than 100km from Mecca, if I was going to build a Muslim tourist trap that's where I'd put it.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    6. Re:A white elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saudis don't drink in Saudi Arabia, its what London was invented for.

    7. Re:A white elephant by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And now look at the map that you linked to. Note how most of those muslims are concentrated in poor parts of the world. There are a few super-rich (i.e. the ones that own the oil), who at least pretend to be muslims, but there aren't a large number that can afford a place like this.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:A white elephant by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      I have done a lot of reading on this subject recently. My conclusion is this - while yes, in Abu Dhabi and Saudi Arabia it is fairly common to drink in hotels and bars attached to them (so as to not run-off foreign tourists) - that doesn't mean it is really legal. It's basically just ignored.

      That is, unless you piss someone off, in which case you can get locked up and potentially executed if someone says you are gay. Yes, it has happened according to my research.

      So basically - as long as these countries are run as they are, I am staying far away - I would not travel there, not even for business.

  25. Waste of money by ejtttje · · Score: 1

    Building a non-oil-based economy would require social and educational development, which in turn requires leadership, or in other words, insight and hard work by the ruling elites.

    However building the tallest phallic symbol just requires throwing money at immigrant workers, and in the long run will accomplish nothing much except an impressive symbol of wasted wealth. But it leaves more playtime for the rulers, and a clear sense of accomplishment ("look at that!")... as opposed to actually empowering their people, which would probably be counter-productive to the rulers anyway, diluting their grip on the region.

  26. Burj Kalafia - space available by Animats · · Score: 1

    If you want an apartment in Dubai, the Burj Kalafia has space available. Rates start at about $20K/year for a hotel-room sized apartment.

  27. love the innovative needle design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be fair, I guess these structures are pushing the strength of materials, and a boxy type structure is probably out of the question.

  28. Our Engineers and Architects by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    In my opinion, there is something wrong when the west's best engineers and architects are designing structures in countries that train very few of their own engineers and architects. It seems to me an economic distortion that is a result of our oversized reliance on foreign oil. Our best and our brightest are often not working on building our own society. I am skeptical of the long term economic wisdom of our current system.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    1. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by timeOday · · Score: 1

      As you said, this building is made from oil, and boy, Saudi Arabia sure is lucky to have lots of it. But wait a minute, US dominance was largely built on our own abundant natural resources in the first place, so how is it unfair that some faraway nation have a little slice of the earth for itself? I think a lot of what we attribute to our superior economic system, or work ethic, or diversity (or maybe we don't attribute it to anything, and simply take for granted that we are #1 and always will be) is actually very predictable based on the discovery of the world's largest stockpile of undeveloped natural resources in 1492. A new resource is discovered or developed, it is exploited resulting in growth, then it peters out. Look at how population growth within the US has shifted from California to Texas in the last decade. Some say it is mostly superior governance, I say it is mostly cheap land.

    2. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the west's best engineers and architects are designing structures in countries that train very few of their own engineers and architects.

      Since the middle ages, the best craftsmen doing architectural details, for example, have been in demand as far as they have been able to travel. Italian decorators were ordered to embellish Indian palaces at the time of prosperity. The best, or those most in fashion, go where the money and sense of self-importance is.

      Those countries do train a lot of engineers, they just don't have sufficiently functioning job market for the graduates, which explains many recent and historical events in the area.

    3. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by catchblue22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think a lot of what we attribute to our superior economic system, or work ethic, or diversity (or maybe we don't attribute it to anything, and simply take for granted that we are #1 and always will be) is actually very predictable based on the discovery of the world's largest stockpile of undeveloped natural resources in 1492. A new resource is discovered or developed, it is exploited resulting in growth, then it peters out. Look at how population growth within the US has shifted from California to Texas in the last decade. Some say it is mostly superior governance, I say it is mostly cheap land.

      I guess that explains Japan's economic success. Or Hong Kong's. Or Switzerland's. Or Taiwan's. Or Korea's. Yep. Land. I'm not sure I am fully able to explain America's economic success. But I think an hypothesis is forming for me about America's economic decline, that it is associated with an intellectual decline exemplified by half-baked economic ideologies indirectly referred to in the above comment.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    4. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      America's economic success in the 1800s and early 1900s was very different from Japan's economic success in the mid-to-late 1900s. We did it largely with natural resources, and later science and engineering talent, plus rebuilding Europe after two devastating wars. They did it with science and engineering talent and other intellectual pursuits.

      And yes, our decline is largely going to be associated with intellectual decline, along with a giant amount of corruption and bad governance. We still have some resources, but a lot of them have been tapped out for a while now so other places are leaders for mining: China, Zambia, Bolivia, etc. But while we're definitely experiencing an intellectual decline, at least we're doing better than Saudi Arabia: they had to hire us to design their skyscraper for them. In fact, lots of skyscrapers around the world have been designed by American architects, including I believe the Petronas Towers in Malaysia.

    5. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by timeOday · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question you should be asking is, why are Americans still so much better off than almost all of the nations you listed when they stomp us on every standardized test imaginable? You listed the surprising example of Japan, which peaked over 20 years ago! They're an intelligent, well-organized nation that seemed to have a miraculous economy for a decade or two until all the other Asian tigers started to catch up with them, because there was nothing about their industry that couldn't be replicated elsewhere. You think the US feels threatened by China, just consider Japan, and their similar-but-far-larger neighbor next door! Look at US exports to China, and what a large - and growing - proportion of that is "crude materials." If we were a resource-poor nation that wedge would be gone. Now look at our huge agricultural exports, and how many of the nations you listed aren't even self-sufficient in basic foodstuffs! Sure, high-tech farming helps, but you still need land and water. Now consider US law and politics, which were founded on egalitarian, agrarian society. This was possible because there was enough land for everybody to be a landowner, in contrast with Europe where everything was already owned by somebody and wealth (and thus political power) had concentrated on land owners over the centuries. At the very least, you must concede that the height of US power - post WWII - was facilitated by not being destroyed in the war while our main economic competitors were, thanks largely to geography.

    6. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      It might be worth considering. The people who are designing buildings like this are senior partners in their respective firms. They graduated 30-40 years ago, when the USA still had a pretty substantial lead in educational standards.

      The people doing poorly on today's standardized tests are only 15, after all.

    7. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by tgd · · Score: 1

      Japan's economic success lasted a couple of decades, and by all measure ended 20 years ago.

      Hong Kongs has been no longer, nor Korea or Taiwan.

      Your list basically proves the GP's point -- that kind of economic boom happens for a short period of time because of having the right resources (oil, gold, sugarcane, bananas, near-slave-labor) at the right time.

    8. Re:Our Engineers and Architects by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Japan's economic success lasted a couple of decades, and by all measure ended 20 years ago.

      Your measure of economic success is skewed in my opinion. Has Japan suddenly regressed to being undeveloped? Did they rip up their roads, their hight speed rail lines, their factories? Did they suddenly become Somalia? Or even Argentina? No. They had the "misfortune" of developing a prosperous middle class economy. And that is being declared an unacceptable luxury by the modern robber barons/billionaires who mould our current economic system.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. skyscraperpage.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://skyscraperpage.com/ is THE site on the web if your interested in these kinds of things.

  31. American War relief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they should thank america for blowing thier own economy on a war so they can build this tower....

  32. Re:Burj Kalafia - space available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pay more right here in NY

  33. Ten years later.... by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

    The architect screams "Fuck! This wasn't the deepest well on Earth! It was a tower!"

    --
    I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
  34. It gives Al Qaida . . . by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    . . . plenty of time to figure out how they are going to fly a plane into it. At that height, they might not need to do it themselves. Remember July 28, 1945 -- http://www.archive.org/details/Pa2107Empire. The risks of standing out in a crowd.

    1. Re:It gives Al Qaida . . . by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I thought Al Qaida and Osama Bin Laden where friendly with the Saudis.

    2. Re:It gives Al Qaida . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong

  35. Big buildings... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...little dicks.

  36. This should be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mega-skyscraper with a (presumably) large investment by "the Binladen Group, the Saudi construction giant owned by the family of Osama bin Laden". What could possibly go wrong?

  37. Something wrong with using a future tense? by eepok · · Score: 1

    "Saudi Arabia Begins Construction of [what will be the] Worldâ(TM)s Tallest Building

    "The total cost for the tower is [estimated to be] $1.2 billion. It [will] feature a Four Seasons hotel, Four Seasons serviced apartments, luxury condominiums, top class office space and [what will be] the world's highest observatory."

    That said, I predict financial failure IF it ever gets built because (news flash) almost no one wants to visit Saudi Arabia and those who want to won't be able to afford staying in that building.

    1. Re:Something wrong with using a future tense? by Jiro · · Score: 1

      Saudi Arabia has Mecca, which means every Muslim wants to visit it since they are required to go to Mecca once in their lifetime.

      It's sort of like the oil--it gives the Saudis a windfall which they can get just by being there without doing anything to improve their country.

  38. "Mine is bigger than yours" by Urthas · · Score: 1

    This is what Arab nations do for fun, apparently: build ever taller and more opulent structures. Woo.

  39. Big target? by Theovon · · Score: 1

    I'm no expert on middle east politics, but there seems to be some amount of conflict over there. Saudi Arabia seems to be among the friendlier countries, but there's no guarantee that they won't be attacked by some radicals who think the Saudis aren't Muslim enough or something. Or maybe the Saudis will piss off the Israelis. However you spin it, this building could conceivable make a nice big target for some terrorists.

    So who would want to work there?

  40. re: elevator layout by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    That's actually my biggest concern about these super tall structures. It seems like the more occupants you place in a single structure, the more you risk accidents that cause a need for evacuation (fire most obviously, but also such things as flooding from burst pipes or carelessness). If a far more efficient system of elevators isn't put together than what I normally see used, I'd worry about the safety of such buildings. I know we've got a pretty basic 22 story apartment building (former hotel) here in town that I occasionally get called out to for computer service calls, and quite a few older people in relatively poor health have moved in there. It only has 2 regular passenger elevators (and I believe a 3rd. freight elevator on an opposite wall), and at least one of the two primary elevators is often shut down for maintenance or repairs. You can expect to spend a good 4-5 minutes getting from an upper floor apartment to the lobby, in most cases, with all the people constantly going in and out. It already seems to me like it pushes the boundaries of "safe", as "run of the mill" as it is in height.

    Plus, despite all the talk about real-estate becoming so scare we need these structures? I'm not sure there aren't diminishing returns past a certain number of floors. How much extra money does it cost to construct buildings like this to withstand high winds and to run utilities that far up and down to each room that needs them? Wouldn't you be better off building all of the buildings in the area with, say, 15 or 20 floors, vs. trying to have a few mega-structures like this?

  41. Looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    someone's trying to take a peek at all the virgins they were promised...

  42. Coming Recession by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    Of course, there is a high coloration between building bib buildings and economic crash. Think of it as the last gasp of optimism. Think Empire State building, World Trade Center, Malaysia 10 years ago, Dubai a few years ago

  43. You can feed Somalia for 4 months by Quila · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And then they'd go back to starving again.

    I heard it said once, and it seems true for the most part when describing populations: People don't starve, people are starved.

    They are starved by communism (forced farm collectivation), a kleptocracy that keeps everything to the dictator and his supporters, wars that displace people and ruin crops, or they are purposely starved as part of a program by the rulers to suppress a certain demographic.

    Donations of food will only temporarily alleviate the problem. A bomb dropped on the dictator's palace might be money better spent.

    1. Re:You can feed Somalia for 4 months by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      A bomb dropped on the dictator's palace might be money better spent./quote.

      Not unless you first come up with some way to ensure that another doesn't take his place.

  44. Mane one larger by tagno25 · · Score: 1

    Now someone needs to make one with a volume of 3*3*3 KM

  45. I guess all Binladens don't destroy buildings by llZENll · · Score: 1

    "Among investors is the Binladen Group, the Saudi construction giant owned by the family of Osama bin Laden."

  46. How to kill Somalis [Re:How many hungry people?] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As to feeding Somalis, assuming about 1 USD / day to feed a person, you could feed all of Somalia for 4 months

    Free food for four months would, of course, bankrupt every farmer left in Somalia. So, at the end of that four months, the situation would be truly desperate, far worse than before.

    Fortunately, however, if you sent the food to Somalia it would all go to the existing warlords and gang leaders who control the countryside-- there is no government in Somalia-- and little or none of it would actually go to feeding the people, except for those with enough money to buy it from the warlords. So the problem would solve itself.

  47. Ironic by bigsexyjoe · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who finds it ironic that the Binladen Group will be creating a skyscraper?

  48. Re:How to kill Somalis [Re:How many hungry people? by Jiro · · Score: 1

    I never quite understood the claims that Somalia has no government. Isn't "warlord" just another term for "government, run as dictatorship, controlling a small area, without membership in the United Nations"? The only difference between Saudi Arabia and a Somali warlord is a matter of scale and the fact that the Saudis have more money.

  49. I figure a bomb every three months by Quila · · Score: 1

    Knock off each up-and-coming warlord before he can consolidate his power. In the perpetual confusion at the top, the people at the bottom will be able to organize themselves and begin providing food.

    It costs about $30,000 total to deliver a smart bomb. Not a bad deal, much cheaper than just giving food.

    1. Re:I figure a bomb every three months by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Knock off each up-and-coming warlord before he can consolidate his power. In the perpetual confusion at the top, the people at the bottom will be able to organize themselves and begin providing food.

      You don't need to consolidate power at the level of the country to effectively suppress the population. Even a few villages is enough. Just look at Somalia - not just the big players, but hundreds of small warbands, each dominating their own area with quickly shifting alliances.

      The only ones that can remove the dictators and keep it that way are people who're being oppressed by them. External intervention is only meaningful when there is conventional warfare with a well-defined entity on the other side (e.g. as in Korea). So far, all attempts to bring "civilization" or "democracy" directly by force of arms have failed - just look at how well Soviets and then NATO fared in Afghanistan.

  50. Good argument for special ops by Quila · · Score: 1

    Train the locals to kill the warlords, and help them do it.

    This was really a somewhat factual joke. But sending food is pointless, since it doesn't help in the long run, and can even serve to help prop up the dictator or warlord who is the source of the starvation. Either he confiscates the food to prop up the regime, the food going to the people allows him to confiscate more local food to prop up the regime, or the people finally being fed can alleviate the dissatisfaction that could cause them to revolt.

    In reality, both would be required. Train them and give them food and supplies to be strong enough to take out the warlord.

    So far, all attempts to bring "civilization" or "democracy" directly by force of arms have failed

    I can't think of an instance where just sending food ended long-term famine either. They will remain poor and starving until their political situation improves, and in these places that is not likely to happen through peaceful means.

  51. Yawn... by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

    Does tallest building really impress anyone anymore? How about doing something interesting with that money like doing something in space or starting new research laboratories. Skyscrapers are boring.

    1. Re:Yawn... by Exclamation+mark! · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the flash mentality of the arabs. They love bling. It's how they define themselves. New phones, cars. They have nothing else to define themselves by except bling since everything is forbidden.

      --
      I'm a wanker.... and loving it!
    2. Re:Yawn... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      A space elevator would be pretty blingy

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  52. I hope a bunch of Christians fly a 767 into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What better way for the ruling elites to tell the commoners how little they think of em than to waste a billion dollars on a giant concrete wang while they're starving and oppressed.

  53. Ozymandias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shelley said it all.

  54. irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh, is it just me or is this ironicly a slap in the face?, The arabs blow up our twin towers then say fuck you and build the biggest ever

  55. Fuck the Saudis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A country that would put me to death for my sexual orientation does not deserve to have such things. Fuck Saudi Arabia and their immoral sharia bullshit.

  56. Re:How to kill Somalis [Re:How many hungry people? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    I've mostly heard people say Somalia doesn't have an effective government. I don't keep up on it much, but there are competing factions and at least one president that some people recognize. Depending on how you define terms, total anarchy could be government. Somalia has way more than that.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  57. VROOOOOOOOOOM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to crash planes into that fucker. Seriously, they need a taste of their own medicine.

  58. Bin Ladin's family is building it by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I guess that means that it will be safe from Al Qaeda.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  59. Re: elevator layout by Jeremi · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't you be better off building all of the buildings in the area with, say, 15 or 20 floors, vs. trying to have a few mega-structures like this?

    Yes, of course you would, if practicality and usefulness was your goal. But of course this building isn't about those things, it's about showing the world that the Saudis have the world's biggest, um, buildings.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  60. An observatory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't buildings designed to sway?

    I guess they gotta use image stabilization on a very large scale.

  61. Kingdom Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " the tower is a part of an economic initiative to strengthen Saudi Arabia’s economy by diversifying away from crude oil"

    Without oil the country is a piece of land surrounded by very saline seas, where the only possible exports may be:
    1) Salt water
    2) Sand
    3) Some electricity (from solar energy)
    4) Dates
    5) Some precious minerals from sand / rocks
    6) Camel milk ;-)

    And it can also export about 20 million ideologically brainwashed, violence mongering Wahhabi nomadic tribals whose
    only ability is to feel that they have a superior spiritual culture in orthodox Islam. But I can't really blame them, they
    have been like that for the past 5000 years (the last 1500 of which have been especially bloody because of the purported
    religion of peace) and have too much sand to hide their already fried heads in. What are these idiots thinking exactly ?
    where are they going to get the energy to run a post-oil economy or the water to quench the lifestyle of so many people
    who are basically morons in their ability to understand the world, forget about how to think creatively to adapt to a changing
    world ...

  62. a bit silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and average person in that country could ever afford to even stay a night at a hotel there, let alone live there, and few will be educated enough to work there in the office space

  63. Building for the future? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh well. Wanting to diversify their economy away from crude oil, they build a huge (admittedly stunning and beautiful) tower for those made rich by oil. I find no flaw in this logic whatsoever...

  64. Re:How to kill Somalis [Re:How many hungry people? by oiron · · Score: 1

    Government != responsible government...

  65. The real reason by kryliss · · Score: 1

    Things like this and the island paradises they keep building is the real reason why gas is so high priced.

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.