No. Gammas penetrate through a tin can but do not cause the contents to become radioactive. Fallout and other radioactive contamination are not neutron sources. There *might* be some nuclides present that undergo spontaneous fission, and those would emit neutrons, although the flux would be small, and neutrons are not more penetrating than gammas, particularly through substances with low atomic weight, like beans in sauce.
Actually, there are two kinds of atheism, weak and strong. Former is lack of belief in God, latter is believe that there is definitely no god. It gets confusing when people start saying things about atheism without distinguishing which atheism they mean.
Of course it dissolves in water. I'm not going to look up the Henrys Law constant for it now, but all gases can dissolve in water, more so at lower temperatures.
How does one account for the fact that the fault is underwater, and the radon would have to bubble up through all that water, and not dissolve in it or be carried elsewhere by currents as it came up? Also, is the activity of the radon at the concentration it might reasonably achieve in the atmosphere sufficient to account for significant ionization?
The problem is not Joe Schmoe thinking that, it's Joe Biden (or s.o. else in gov't.) thinking that. BTW, your statement is an outright admission that illegitimate uses are now the predominant ones.
Their freedom? Have you had your head in a deep hole for the last, say, six months? Yeah, sure, we installed Mubarak and propped up Qaddafi, and all that. And if we completely left the middle east, liberty would just abound there, wouldn't it?
Slashdot Mirror
Very funny. Well played, sir.
I dunno but "Stay Gold" refers to a Stevie Wonder song.
Will they be flatulent? I saw that on Doctor Who. Well, OK, it didn't involve Duke Nukem Forever. But the aliens were pig-like.
If anything is funny, it is your comment. Burnup? Care to define that?
In that case, it should have been "CIA Zecret Aircraft Research Area", or possibly "Top Secret Aircraft Research Area".
Your name wouldn't happen to be "BadAnalogyGuy", would it?
No. Gammas penetrate through a tin can but do not cause the contents to become radioactive. Fallout and other radioactive contamination are not neutron sources. There *might* be some nuclides present that undergo spontaneous fission, and those would emit neutrons, although the flux would be small, and neutrons are not more penetrating than gammas, particularly through substances with low atomic weight, like beans in sauce.
...nope. Still be on Linux Beta.
No, just a plain old run-of-the-mill moron.
Bzzzt.
It's a Geiger-Mueller tube, not a Geiger-Mueller counter. The counter, or meter, contains or connects to, a G-M tube, which is the sensor.
What?
The beans in an unopened can don't get radioactively contaminated by being in the presence of radioactivity, unless it is a neutron source.
An activity is not analogous to having a belief.
Actually, there are two kinds of atheism, weak and strong. Former is lack of belief in God, latter is believe that there is definitely no god. It gets confusing when people start saying things about atheism without distinguishing which atheism they mean.
I'll sell you some. I've got a bunch.
Of course it dissolves in water. I'm not going to look up the Henrys Law constant for it now, but all gases can dissolve in water, more so at lower temperatures.
How does one account for the fact that the fault is underwater, and the radon would have to bubble up through all that water, and not dissolve in it or be carried elsewhere by currents as it came up? Also, is the activity of the radon at the concentration it might reasonably achieve in the atmosphere sufficient to account for significant ionization?
Is your last name actually Noory?
Not as tough as waterbears, I bet.
The problem is not Joe Schmoe thinking that, it's Joe Biden (or s.o. else in gov't.) thinking that.
BTW, your statement is an outright admission that illegitimate uses are now the predominant ones.
And they could call it...AlphaMax, or something like that. Since it would be big (figuratively speaking) and they'd be the first ones to do it!
It's already too late to have gone the way of those things.
+1, Like!
(I say this *after* reading it, fyi.)
OK *part of it* is true, but the last sentence is stupid, not true.
That's a fine example, but not of a change to the US Tax Code. That's about a state tax issue. Ohio. Not the US.
Their freedom? Have you had your head in a deep hole for the last, say, six months?
Yeah, sure, we installed Mubarak and propped up Qaddafi, and all that. And if we completely left the middle east, liberty would just abound there, wouldn't it?