Exactly. Even if IBM could put 100 silicon atoms into a nice array in only one second, and I'm sure they cannot, how long would it take to get to one gram? Longer than the universe has been in existence.
Why? As long as your competitors know fewer you'd do fine. You don't lose anything for wrong answers except in "Daily Doubles" where you could bet as little as you like. I'm pretty sure I've seen Jeopardy contestants who knew fewer than fifty percent of the answers.
You remembered wrong. I believe it is C (up to) F (up to) Bflat (down to) G (or equivalent in another key). I'm embarrassed to admit I've watched that show, but only because it comes on right after Jeopardy!
And that would actually line up with what the Bible says, so you would fail to convince. And as another poster said, for other reasons, your approach is not likely to change her thinking.
How does owning a website fill the need that Facebook fills? If I wanted to "follow" Jay Cutler or read what other NFL players are saying about him, an irc channel would be of no use. NFL players (insert other real people of interest to other people) don't use irc. And couldn't "lazy" be a reason rather than "dumb"?
+1. It results in a self-fulfilling prophecy. Gmail seems much better at keeping the spam away, but that's probably because the Hotmail account is used for all the lame registrations. Makes gmail seem so much better, which reinforces the decision.
Of course he has used them. But he's used fewer than past presidents. Want to know who has used the *fewest* (based on number signed per year in office)? G. W. Bush. Surprised? Me too.
I made a little table based on the numbers from the archives.gov page on Executive Orders.
Average of EOs/yr Sum of total # EOs D 97.8 4758 Carter 79.8 319 Clinton 45.4 363 Johnson 64.6 323 Kennedy 71.0 213 Obama 37.0 74 Roosevelt 288.8 3466
R 84.3 3733 Bush 41.3 165 Eisenhower 60.1 481 Ford 56.0 168 G.W. Bush 36.3 290 Hoover 252.8 1011 Nixon 69.0 345 Reagan 47.5 380 Truman 111.6 893
Grand Total 90.1 8491
Dems average more than GOP, and the numbers have generally been decreasing since Hoover. I'd have expected the opposite.
I didn't see any numbers/lists of Executive Orders in your first wikipedia link, and the your second link specifically says in its first sentence, "The following is an incomplete list of United States federal executive orders." [italics mine]
More reactor-years in the Nuclear Navy than commercial reactors for sure. Interesting to me is that it won't be a bigger plant. Little old S3G plants are right in that 50-200 MW range. Why not take advantage of whatever it is they're taking advantage of by putting it underwater and make it bigger?
Slashdot Mirror
Two microseconds can be a long time in the world of chemical reactions.
We just need like a teaspoon of neutron star matter. That should do the trick.
Exactly. Even if IBM could put 100 silicon atoms into a nice array in only one second, and I'm sure they cannot, how long would it take to get to one gram? Longer than the universe has been in existence.
Why is this not modded funny? I LOL'd.
1. I didn't know "parabolicity" was a property of curves.
2. The deer could have been standing in front of a slope.
3. It was a joke.
But which sample of water? And how do you accurately measure the pressure (arbitrarily accurate)?
A singer (Crosby). Also a variety of cherry (not as good as Rainier but pretty good).
Why? As long as your competitors know fewer you'd do fine. You don't lose anything for wrong answers except in "Daily Doubles" where you could bet as little as you like. I'm pretty sure I've seen Jeopardy contestants who knew fewer than fifty percent of the answers.
You remembered wrong. I believe it is C (up to) F (up to) Bflat (down to) G (or equivalent in another key).
I'm embarrassed to admit I've watched that show, but only because it comes on right after Jeopardy!
And that would actually line up with what the Bible says, so you would fail to convince. And as another poster said, for other reasons, your approach is not likely to change her thinking.
Hint: the "government" that is paying them is not the same "government" that is taxing them.
Just out of curiosity, why do you do this? How often? Do you work for the FCC?
I think they were talking about proximal cause not root cause, and saying that computers were not even the proximal cause, much less the root cause.
"I get nothing except "disable advertising" on the right column."
For me, that no longer works. I check the box and still see ads.
If those are golf balls, then that laptop sitting next to it is freaking ginormous.
But "crazy" was only one of the two words mentioned.
Well, there's creme filling (what's the difference between creme and cream anyway?) inside an Oreo cookie.
Hmmm, that might actually be on-topic.
Double down. Perfect pairs. Late surrender. Lucky ladies.
How does owning a website fill the need that Facebook fills?
If I wanted to "follow" Jay Cutler or read what other NFL players are saying about him, an irc channel would be of no use. NFL players (insert other real people of interest to other people) don't use irc.
And couldn't "lazy" be a reason rather than "dumb"?
+1. It results in a self-fulfilling prophecy. Gmail seems much better at keeping the spam away, but that's probably because the Hotmail account is used for all the lame registrations. Makes gmail seem so much better, which reinforces the decision.
Of course he has used them. But he's used fewer than past presidents.
Want to know who has used the *fewest* (based on number signed per year in office)? G. W. Bush. Surprised? Me too.
I made a little table based on the numbers from the archives.gov page on Executive Orders.
Average of EOs/yr Sum of total # EOs
D 97.8 4758
Carter 79.8 319
Clinton 45.4 363
Johnson 64.6 323
Kennedy 71.0 213
Obama 37.0 74
Roosevelt 288.8 3466
R 84.3 3733
Bush 41.3 165
Eisenhower 60.1 481
Ford 56.0 168
G.W. Bush 36.3 290
Hoover 252.8 1011
Nixon 69.0 345
Reagan 47.5 380
Truman 111.6 893
Grand Total 90.1 8491
Dems average more than GOP, and the numbers have generally been decreasing since Hoover. I'd have expected the opposite.
I didn't see any numbers/lists of Executive Orders in your first wikipedia link, and the your second link specifically says in its first sentence, "The following is an incomplete list of United States federal executive orders." [italics mine]
GP was quoting a federal government website: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/disposition.html.
Why should I trust wikipedia over that, even if I did find a simple and complete list on wikipedia?
More reactor-years in the Nuclear Navy than commercial reactors for sure.
Interesting to me is that it won't be a bigger plant. Little old S3G plants are right in that 50-200 MW range. Why not take advantage of whatever it is they're taking advantage of by putting it underwater and make it bigger?
Ha ha. I don't use the PrtSc key. I use Cropper.
ADM = Amoebic Dysentery Market