Is that going to happen because the government owns GM now, so they're going to require us all to buy only GM, since only GM cars have OnStar? Or require all other car manufacturers to license OnStar from GM? Either way, improving the revenues of GM?
Please don't spread this lie. If you rely on water to get all the carbonates, chlorides, sodium, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. that you need, you probably should try eating food!
If I drink a glass of water with no ions in it except hydronium and hydroxyl, it will cease to be so as soon as it touches my mouth, and if you tell me that it will leach out all the minerals in my body, that would be true of any water that contains a lower concentration of those ions than the fluid in my body does, but it would be hard to drink enough water for that to matter. Your body (specifically your kidneys) does a good job of maintaining homeostasis and keeping the electrolytes it needs and getting rid of the rest, whether you drink water with 50ppm of sodium chloride or water with zero electrolytes.
As for the taste, you're right. But that's all it is. A matter of taste.
I think that means you just need to not put fructose in the gum, or drink HFCS-containing beverages while you chew the gum etc (i.e. not have fructose in your mouth at the time)
Or to have a unique toothbrush for each day of the month, and if you use the wrong toothbrush for today's date, you don't get to use your teeth (eat solid food) that day!
Incentive to rake up all those leaves and keep the streets clean. Of course, decaying leaves provide nutrients back into the soil which would now be lost as extraction of the gold (there's some energy intensive stuff) takes the leaves out of the biosphere. I'm sure thats the only unintended consequence of this scheme.
So the energy usage of streetlights is right up there with global warming, malaria, AIDs, cancer, hunger, and the contamination of our precious bodily fluids? Who knew?
What does it mean to be miserable without even realizing it? Is that even possible? Insufferable perhaps, but how can there be misery without awareness?
You realize there is no state income tax in Washington state - where this article is about, don't you? What income tax are you talking about eliminating?
Slashdot Mirror
Is that going to happen because the government owns GM now, so they're going to require us all to buy only GM, since only GM cars have OnStar? Or require all other car manufacturers to license OnStar from GM? Either way, improving the revenues of GM?
100% pure water is ... dangerous for your health
Please don't spread this lie. If you rely on water to get all the carbonates, chlorides, sodium, calcium, iron, magnesium, potassium, etc. that you need, you probably should try eating food!
If I drink a glass of water with no ions in it except hydronium and hydroxyl, it will cease to be so as soon as it touches my mouth, and if you tell me that it will leach out all the minerals in my body, that would be true of any water that contains a lower concentration of those ions than the fluid in my body does, but it would be hard to drink enough water for that to matter. Your body (specifically your kidneys) does a good job of maintaining homeostasis and keeping the electrolytes it needs and getting rid of the rest, whether you drink water with 50ppm of sodium chloride or water with zero electrolytes.
As for the taste, you're right.
But that's all it is. A matter of taste.
A *one-act* play in order to be without "cuts". Most are not one-act, AFAIK.
Yep, that's the cycle. Carry on.
BTW, laptops with 1920x1200 displays are not common. Is yours also a ThinkPad W series?
Hmm. I can read it at the same screen resolution. Are you familiar with the text to begin with? I am. Maybe that helps a lot.
0.1%? I don't think so.
No, ferric.
I'm guessing it's not LaTEX. I'd like to be wrong.
I think that means you just need to not put fructose in the gum, or drink HFCS-containing beverages while you chew the gum etc (i.e. not have fructose in your mouth at the time)
Might be interesting - I didn't look up where those particular locations are - but this is the wrong thread for it.
Or to have a unique toothbrush for each day of the month, and if you use the wrong toothbrush for today's date, you don't get to use your teeth (eat solid food) that day!
Unusual weather conditions (still air, etc.)?
Are you suggesting that no science should be done unless it solves global warming, malaria, AIDS, cancer or hunger?
No. That's not what I said, is it?
I was merely making a comparison, which the GP's post was also doing.
Incentive to rake up all those leaves and keep the streets clean.
Of course, decaying leaves provide nutrients back into the soil which would now be lost as extraction of the gold (there's some energy intensive stuff) takes the leaves out of the biosphere.
I'm sure thats the only unintended consequence of this scheme.
So the energy usage of streetlights is right up there with global warming, malaria, AIDs, cancer, hunger, and the contamination of our precious bodily fluids? Who knew?
What does it mean to be miserable without even realizing it? Is that even possible? Insufferable perhaps, but how can there be misery without awareness?
So desu. Watashi-no machigai.
That's why he said "doesn't mean" and not "means that the majority is never right". "Doesn't mean" doesn't mean "never means". Ouch. My head hurts.
...and the "grocer's apostrophe's".
aQuantive. Look it up. OK, it's not really tech, but it's tech-related.
"Whoooosh" always has kind of a gentle, breezy sound, don't you think?
You realize there is no state income tax in Washington state - where this article is about, don't you?
What income tax are you talking about eliminating?
And it makes it from cholesterol - that stuff that some people are so afraid of!
The problem is that it really doesn't mean anything. I expect GP understands that and is being facetious.