In the end, Amazon just sells more physical copies too and the publisher streamlines sale. I doubt B&N sells all that much of anything in their stores now.
Law Enforcement Oath of Honor On my honor, I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always uphold the constitution, my community, and the agency I serve.
You can see here: http://www.wichiefs.org/oath.cfm that this oath of Honor is taken by officers at UW-Stout. If the chief finds her oath so utterly meaningless, I think the whole department is in trouble.
She is still a jack-booted thug bent on suppressing speech...
No I don't accept the statement it is her job. She has likely taken an oath that she violated the moment she decided to suppress speech. Orders and policies are irrelevant.
Seriously, what basis is there for calling the Playook moderately successful. You might (maybe) call the Tab moderately successful. The playbook drops in price every week. That is no kind of successful but un.
Because Apple is already paying for these patents through intel in all current and future devices. Samsung even admits this. They are trying to block future sales based on past POSSIBLE infringement. Samsung contends they dont know if Apple used licensed chips in the past or not. This is the weakest patent case ever filed.
It is not their patent portfolio. They are abusing the entire international standards system. Using a FRAND patent only against one other company is by definition discriminatory...
Apple makes more than twice their profit and has about 4 times their cash. Or are you asserting that Samsung will stop paying their bills and fight Apple with money from the top line.
Actually it means precisely that. Apple is paying to license 3G through Intel. Samsung can not then turn around and say that does not cover their part of the Standard.
Slashdot Mirror
But DC will not lose a single sale...
In the end, Amazon just sells more physical copies too and the publisher streamlines sale. I doubt B&N sells all that much of anything in their stores now.
Had the music industry not insisted on DRM, iTunes would have never had anything like the power it ended up with..
Some do, but it is usually not accurate to judge a group by its fanatics. A lot of prominent Christians have denounced these lunatics.
I am not a Christian, but I was born Catholic.
The only thing God hates are zealots speaking on his behalf.
I like your analysis.
That would be pretty creepy and kind of cool.
This can be generalized to God hates zealots.
When I first saw this story, I told my wife that I hope one day the WBC will protest my funeral.
Well put friend.
Some grieve with anger. We still love you.
In fact here it is:
Law Enforcement Oath of Honor
On my honor, I will never
betray my badge, my integrity,
my character or the public trust.
I will always have the courage to hold
myself and others accountable for our actions.
I will always uphold the
constitution, my community, and the
agency I serve.
You can see here: http://www.wichiefs.org/oath.cfm that this oath of Honor is taken by officers at UW-Stout. If the chief finds her oath so utterly meaningless, I think the whole department is in trouble.
She is still a jack-booted thug bent on suppressing speech...
No I don't accept the statement it is her job. She has likely taken an oath that she violated the moment she decided to suppress speech. Orders and policies are irrelevant.
Why does he seem to be one? It would be very difficult to function as a theatre professor with a complete aversion to fictional violence...
Good Job HTC.
All true but written in a confusing way. The $79 kindle does not have a touch screen, so how could it have a touch screen keyboard..
How does that differ from regular software development. I suspect that the numbers are worse in general.
Seriously, what basis is there for calling the Playook moderately successful. You might (maybe) call the Tab moderately successful. The playbook drops in price every week. That is no kind of successful but un.
Using a FRAND patent defensively is discrimination and I believe a fraud against the standards body.
This is not a tv drama. This is not a gotcha moment.
Because Apple is already paying for these patents through intel in all current and future devices. Samsung even admits this. They are trying to block future sales based on past POSSIBLE infringement. Samsung contends they dont know if Apple used licensed chips in the past or not. This is the weakest patent case ever filed.
It is not their patent portfolio. They are abusing the entire international standards system. Using a FRAND patent only against one other company is by definition discriminatory...
Well keep in mind that Apple now owns a massive piece of the LTE IP...
Apple makes more than twice their profit and has about 4 times their cash. Or are you asserting that Samsung will stop paying their bills and fight Apple with money from the top line.
It was a registered design that Apple filed in 1994 and has a little more to it than a shape. Not saying it is a good idea.
Actually it means precisely that. Apple is paying to license 3G through Intel. Samsung can not then turn around and say that does not cover their part of the Standard.