You have a point, but so far I haven't heard about Trump suing whoever released that recording of a private conversation.
He threatens lawsuits, but as expected, he doesn't follow through. Trump will never sue anyone for libel or releasing or reporting on a private conversation, because he worries about what would be learned in the discovery phase. This is a guy who was comfortable with his teenaged daughter being called a "piece of ass". He's a urinal cake.
It's hilarious how Tolerant Liberals take the word of Donald Trump as gospel whenever it suits their pathetic desperate attempts at overturning an election.
Fair enough. So you're the right person to ask: Was he bullshitting then or is he bullshitting now? Or was the electoral college really an abomination in 2012, but is a beautiful thing now? Was resistance the right thing to do in 2012, but is a Very Bad Thing now?
Or are the very concepts of logic and consistency rigged? How far will you debase your ability to reason in order to support this corrupt urinal cake?
The electoral college was specifically set in place to allow "states" to elect the president of the united "states" instead of the people. The federal government has a president of the United States not the United "People".
Let's ask Donald Trump what he thinks of the electoral college:
So let's apply what you said to Donald Trump, first and foremost, huh?
I don't know if you actually understand this and are simply trying to convince the ignorant to be useful idiots or if you seriously never bothered reading past the preamble and skipped school during your civics classes or something.
I'm guessing you didn't do that well in your torts class. We aren't talking defamation, we're at least potentially talking about trademark tarnishment.
First you have to prove that his trademark wasn't already tarnished. Settling a fraud lawsuit for $25,000,000.00 sort of puts a little patina on it. How do you prove that having "Dump Towers" on Google maps for a few minutes is what did the damage and not him talking about grabbing women's pussies?
Before this Google maps prank, you already had bookings at Trump hotels way down.
The government isn't going to let fully automated trucks run around with nobody to watch them any time soon
Haven't you heard? There's a new sheriff in town and his badge has a six-pointed star. Except he doesn't wear the badge, you do. Because you're a truck driver and your days are numbered.
We just don't need you any more. Sorry, not sorry. You can look for a job in the service sector, but only if you happen to look like a Slovenian hooker.
. At least that is how it sounded to me, like people were physically inside the stores, just wandering around, no intent to buy anything
"intent"? How do you determine intent? Have you ever in your life gone into a store, say, looking for a TV, and not really intending to buy anything but just looking to see which model you want when you're ready to pull the trigger? Or maybe just getting specs so you can compare?
If so, then you should also be banned. I've seen many people here talk about looking for a certain gizmo or something and checking it out in a store and then going home and ordering it online.
It's ok. We've run this story through the Ministry of Truth Internet Submission Suite servers. Since every internet post now has to originate from the government servers, we know this is real.
That's exactly what a purveyor of fake news would say.
"All news are fake". Who benefits from the belief that "all news are fake"?
And since this statement is clearly being made by a non-native English speaker (I assume Russian), who benefits from getting Americans to believe that "all news are fake""?
Slashdot Mirror
That's what they want you to believe.
Clearly, it doesn't matter to you.
He threatens lawsuits, but as expected, he doesn't follow through. Trump will never sue anyone for libel or releasing or reporting on a private conversation, because he worries about what would be learned in the discovery phase. This is a guy who was comfortable with his teenaged daughter being called a "piece of ass". He's a urinal cake.
https://variety.com/2016/tv/ne...
Trump belongs to the most protected class of all: millionaires.
Fair enough. So you're the right person to ask: Was he bullshitting then or is he bullshitting now? Or was the electoral college really an abomination in 2012, but is a beautiful thing now? Was resistance the right thing to do in 2012, but is a Very Bad Thing now?
Or are the very concepts of logic and consistency rigged? How far will you debase your ability to reason in order to support this corrupt urinal cake?
Let's ask Donald Trump what he thinks of the electoral college:
https://twitter.com/realDonald...
And let's ask him about how people should just suck it up and accept the results of the election:
https://twitter.com/realDonald...
https://twitter.com/realDonald...
So let's apply what you said to Donald Trump, first and foremost, huh?
They love Trump in the UK:
http://janeygodley.com/wp-cont...
I guess they don't teach US civics in Russia.
I was gonna leave that one alone, but I'm glad someone caught it.
Compared to Trump, George W Bush was a regular Pericles.
You're going to see mockery on a level never before seen in human history. And the Orange Daddy earned every bit of it.
First you have to prove that his trademark wasn't already tarnished. Settling a fraud lawsuit for $25,000,000.00 sort of puts a little patina on it. How do you prove that having "Dump Towers" on Google maps for a few minutes is what did the damage and not him talking about grabbing women's pussies?
Before this Google maps prank, you already had bookings at Trump hotels way down.
Well, he does make the comparison pretty easy.
http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/...
Haven't you heard? There's a new sheriff in town and his badge has a six-pointed star. Except he doesn't wear the badge, you do. Because you're a truck driver and your days are numbered.
We just don't need you any more. Sorry, not sorry. You can look for a job in the service sector, but only if you happen to look like a Slovenian hooker.
FTFY
"intent"? How do you determine intent? Have you ever in your life gone into a store, say, looking for a TV, and not really intending to buy anything but just looking to see which model you want when you're ready to pull the trigger? Or maybe just getting specs so you can compare?
If so, then you should also be banned. I've seen many people here talk about looking for a certain gizmo or something and checking it out in a store and then going home and ordering it online.
Ban the world.
These so-called "scientists" are just trying to cover up the fact that Diet Coke contains natural compounds that act as nature's Viagra.
And, they're trying to suggest that being fat is somehow bad just because the new Leader of the Free World is a fat SOB.
The recount and the audit are two different things.
Yes, Orange Daddy will make everything better. FUCK ME DADDY.
That's just what someone who spreads fake news would say. Interesting.
"Markov" sounds like a Russian name. Hmm.
Is it just me or are the ACs getting even more incomprehensible lately?
That's exactly what a purveyor of fake news would say.
What proof do we have that any of this is real?
"All news are fake". Who benefits from the belief that "all news are fake"?
And since this statement is clearly being made by a non-native English speaker (I assume Russian), who benefits from getting Americans to believe that "all news are fake""?
Um, the protest in the story is taking place in Scotland. It's not Thanksgiving in Scotland.