So what you're saying is that... Hannity's quote is, in fact, accurate
Now wait. You said that Obama "went on an apology tour" and then the proof you offered was a quote, not from Obama, but from Hannity?
I'm confused. I'm not willing to accept that you're that stupid, since you managed to hit both a PREVIEW button and a SUBMIT button. So are you just dishonest? Is that what this is?
Let me leave you with this quote from the President of the United States of America. Not a made-up quote, but an actual quote:
'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'
Barack Obama didn't apologize in any of those clips Hannity showed. In fact, he says, "I will never apologize for promoting the best interest of the United States."
But I do remember when a certain tan-suited "president" decided to go on an apology tour and apologize to every nation he could about America being a land of opportunity.
Yeah, except there were no "apologies". The whole "Obama apology tour" thing was completely made up.
If the local population wants to close the libraries that's their choice since they are the ones paying for them.
This article has nothing to do with a "local decision". It's the opinion of some Economics professor at a third-rate university that Amazon should replace libraries. It has absolutely nothing to do with "local populations".
In fact, I would be surprised if you could find a single community that wants to close its public library. Pew Research did a study that showed nearly 90% of people believe that closing the local public library would have a negative effect on their community, with 65% of those people saying it would have a major negative effect.
Communities love their libraries.
To summarize: This is not the decision of a local population. There is no indication that any local populations want to get rid of their libraries. It's some academic in a pseudo-scientific field, Economics, which is actually less rigorous than parapsychology, giving his own idiotic opinion. His name is Panos Mourdoukoutas, which sounds like some flaming dish you'd order at the Greek Islands Restaurant on Halsted Street. He's gotten his 15 seconds of fame out of his stupid opinion, which was so bad that Forbes Magazine has deleted it from their site out of sheer embarrassment.
Sure, if chain of custody was maintained and documented.
Like with any expert witness, you're going on testimony of the forensic cybersecurity guy.
"Chain of custody" is for physical evidence when in the custody of the police. Expert witness testimony doesn't require a "chain of custody". It just requires someone who has expertise. Trump & The Russians (a new boy band!) can put their own expert witnesses on the stand. I hear Trump is looking for a 400 lb kid in his parents basement right now.
The Mueller investigation started in the last week of May, 2017. Are you rounding 14 months up to "2 years"?
I'm getting the impression that you're just trying to pretend that none of this will touch your crush, President Trump. I think it's best that you continue to make yourself believe that. Also, if one of your remaining teeth should fall out, put it under your pillow and Jared Kushner will put a MAGA hat there for you.
It's little inconveniences like this that make everything Mueller is doing a complete joke.
Five convictions and counting.
Manafort trial in a week. Mariia Butina in custody. Trump lawyers trying to negotiate with Mueller so the president doesn't have to answer any questions about obstruction of justice.
The noose is tightening on this "complete joke", and it's got Trump shook as hell.
The high probability is that of those 4000 seized guns 4000 of them were due to people not realizing you can't take guns on planes,
Give me an honest answer: Is someone who, in 2017, doesn't know you can't take a gun on a plane really smart enough to own a gun? How do they remember which part they're supposed to point away from themselves?
And shouldn't someone who's so stupid that they bring a gun onto an airplane in 2017 get a serious smack upside the head?
At a rate much lower than were caught before the TSA.
Source?
Might want to actually look up what most of those "edged weapons" were, and what "guns" are included in those numbers.
You don't have to "look it up". I've made it easy for you by including a link in my comment above where you can actually see many of the edged weapons and guns.
There is one problem with the CrowdStrike-provided images, which is that although no one questions CrowdStrike's competence or integrity, they did not maintain proper legal chain of custody documentation. This means that information obtained from the images would be easily challenged in any criminal or civil court proceeding.
Signed, forensic images of computer system have been accepted as legal evidence for over a decade.
Personally, if you believe ANYTHING coming from the "Intel Community" either way you're an idiot. They lie. They lie straight faced in front of congress about all sorts of things, spying on Americans to there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. This isn't a "Right vs Left" issue, because both sides have been on both sides of hating and defending the "intel community"
The FBI is not the "Intel Community". They're law enforcement, no less than your local cops. They have about the same record of integrity, too, which is saying, "so-so". But they take the whole, "national security" thing pretty seriously. And that includes all the Trump appointments, and his director of national intelligence and his attorney general. And while you're being Inspector Gadget finally trying to get the dirt on Hillary Clinton, there is a legal noose tightening around Trump's neck. Indictments, convictions, guys in jail.
And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.
So, the question you have to ask yourself is if you believe Donald Trump or people appointed by Republicans to be FBI director, attorney general, FISA judges, etc etc. You can either trust people that have actually earned trust or a guy who changes his story about what he actually said on live fucking camera four times between Monday and Thursday.
Not you, ArchMike. It's too late for you. The question is for other people reading this. You're already too far gone down the 4chan hole looking for pizza and crisis actors. The question is for the grown folks.
Our last bit of blaming 12 Russians for hacking the DNC server was called out in less than a day. They know the FBI hasn't looked at the server and Crowstrike is unwilling to testify that Russia hacked it.
Amazing. Every single word in those two sentences was wrong.
but I feel like if the people with them turned out to be real threats, we'd have heard about the overwrought turrurrism trial to boost the profile of the officials involved.
Maybe the reason you didn't hear about them is because their weapons were taken away before they boarded the plane.
Has anyone tried to smuggle explosives into an airport and been caught?
I think what you really want to know is if anyone has tried to smuggle explosives on to a plane, not into an airport. You don't get checked when you walk into an airport, you get checked when you go to the gates.
And, the answer is "yes". People have tried to smuggle explosives onto airplanes. Here is a partial list of 2017 attempts:
A checked bag containing an ammunition box with three live ground burst simulators, two live M83 smoke grenades, and one inert practice grenade was discovered at the Palm Springs International Airport (PSP). A live flashbang grenade was discovered in a carry-on bag at the San Diego International Airport (SAN). A live smoke grenade was discovered in a carry-on bag at the Raleigh–Durham International Airport (RDU). Not only do smoke grenades deploy a thick blanket of smoke, they also burn extremely hot and are considered hazmat. A one-pound bottle of gun powder was discovered in a checked bag at the Ketchikan International Airport (KTN). Gun powder is never permitted on an aircraft.. Five one-pound bottles of gun powder were discovered in a checked bag at the Boise Airport (BOI). A ten-ounce container of gun powder was discovered in a checked bag at the Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC). While properly packed ammunition is allowed in checked bags, gun powder is strictly prohibited altogether.
There were also about 4,000 guns that TSA seized in 2017 when stupid jackoffs (mostly rappers, professional athletes and Republican officials) tried carrying them onto a plane.
People also like to bring inert explosive devices onto planes for some reason. A bunch of inert hand grenades, claymores, suicide vests and other goodies were seized in 2017. Also, throwing stars, daggers disguised as hairbrushes and tons of other whacky shit.
Only in America is it illegal to put lead in our electronics, which when disposed will likely end up going to China for "recycling", but when it comes to guns, we'll happily skip the middleman and dump lead pellets directly into our own backyard.
In America, we allow MAGA hat-wearing goofballs on psychoactive meds to dump lead directly into our schoolchildren, because some 18th century amendment said well-regulated militias should be armed.
Good, then we can also agree to stop the hundreds of millions of birds that are killed by hunters in Texas every year? Not to mention what the metals in the birdshot are doing to the water and land there.
See? We're finding common ground left and right today!
Slashdot Mirror
Now wait. You said that Obama "went on an apology tour" and then the proof you offered was a quote, not from Obama, but from Hannity?
I'm confused. I'm not willing to accept that you're that stupid, since you managed to hit both a PREVIEW button and a SUBMIT button. So are you just dishonest? Is that what this is?
Let me leave you with this quote from the President of the United States of America. Not a made-up quote, but an actual quote:
Barack Obama didn't apologize in any of those clips Hannity showed. In fact, he says, "I will never apologize for promoting the best interest of the United States."
Only on Fox was that considered an apology.
Yeah, except there were no "apologies". The whole "Obama apology tour" thing was completely made up.
https://www.factcheck.org/2012...
https://www.politifact.com/tru...
https://www.cnn.com/2012/10/23...
Remember when the biggest foreign relations scandal involving a president was giving a bust of Churchill back to England?
Good times.
This article has nothing to do with a "local decision". It's the opinion of some Economics professor at a third-rate university that Amazon should replace libraries. It has absolutely nothing to do with "local populations".
In fact, I would be surprised if you could find a single community that wants to close its public library. Pew Research did a study that showed nearly 90% of people believe that closing the local public library would have a negative effect on their community, with 65% of those people saying it would have a major negative effect.
Communities love their libraries.
To summarize: This is not the decision of a local population. There is no indication that any local populations want to get rid of their libraries. It's some academic in a pseudo-scientific field, Economics, which is actually less rigorous than parapsychology, giving his own idiotic opinion. His name is Panos Mourdoukoutas, which sounds like some flaming dish you'd order at the Greek Islands Restaurant on Halsted Street. He's gotten his 15 seconds of fame out of his stupid opinion, which was so bad that Forbes Magazine has deleted it from their site out of sheer embarrassment.
Good luck trying to find horse property in Toronto.
Like with any expert witness, you're going on testimony of the forensic cybersecurity guy.
"Chain of custody" is for physical evidence when in the custody of the police. Expert witness testimony doesn't require a "chain of custody". It just requires someone who has expertise. Trump & The Russians (a new boy band!) can put their own expert witnesses on the stand. I hear Trump is looking for a 400 lb kid in his parents basement right now.
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be granted to you. Even if you're a treasonous piece of shit.
A guilty plea is the same as a conviction.
Look it up for yourself.
The Mueller investigation started in the last week of May, 2017. Are you rounding 14 months up to "2 years"?
I'm getting the impression that you're just trying to pretend that none of this will touch your crush, President Trump. I think it's best that you continue to make yourself believe that. Also, if one of your remaining teeth should fall out, put it under your pillow and Jared Kushner will put a MAGA hat there for you.
Five convictions and counting.
Manafort trial in a week. Mariia Butina in custody. Trump lawyers trying to negotiate with Mueller so the president doesn't have to answer any questions about obstruction of justice.
The noose is tightening on this "complete joke", and it's got Trump shook as hell.
Give me an honest answer: Is someone who, in 2017, doesn't know you can't take a gun on a plane really smart enough to own a gun? How do they remember which part they're supposed to point away from themselves?
And shouldn't someone who's so stupid that they bring a gun onto an airplane in 2017 get a serious smack upside the head?
The chain of custody on the forensic images has not been questioned.
Well, maybe by Hannity or Alex Jones or someone. Not by anyone who doesn't froth.
Source?
You don't have to "look it up". I've made it easy for you by including a link in my comment above where you can actually see many of the edged weapons and guns.
Signed, forensic images of computer system have been accepted as legal evidence for over a decade.
Of course they would. The FBI uses contractors all the time. Especially for what the president calls "the cyber".
https://www.reuters.com/articl...
There also haven't been any unicorns seized by TSA. But they did seize explosives, edged weapons, and 4,000 fucking guns.
The FBI is not the "Intel Community". They're law enforcement, no less than your local cops. They have about the same record of integrity, too, which is saying, "so-so". But they take the whole, "national security" thing pretty seriously. And that includes all the Trump appointments, and his director of national intelligence and his attorney general. And while you're being Inspector Gadget finally trying to get the dirt on Hillary Clinton, there is a legal noose tightening around Trump's neck. Indictments, convictions, guys in jail.
And yes, there are at least three copies of the forensically-imaged DNC server in the FBI's possession. We know this because the Trump Justice Department has told us so.
So, the question you have to ask yourself is if you believe Donald Trump or people appointed by Republicans to be FBI director, attorney general, FISA judges, etc etc. You can either trust people that have actually earned trust or a guy who changes his story about what he actually said on live fucking camera four times between Monday and Thursday.
Not you, ArchMike. It's too late for you. The question is for other people reading this. You're already too far gone down the 4chan hole looking for pizza and crisis actors. The question is for the grown folks.
I happen to know a lot about the cyber, and the correct procedure is to dip it in bleach.
2016.
https://motherboard.vice.com/e...
Here is some more background on Trump's "Where is the server?" lie:
https://www.politifact.com/tru...
Amazing. Every single word in those two sentences was wrong.
Maybe the reason you didn't hear about them is because their weapons were taken away before they boarded the plane.
I think what you really want to know is if anyone has tried to smuggle explosives on to a plane, not into an airport. You don't get checked when you walk into an airport, you get checked when you go to the gates.
And, the answer is "yes". People have tried to smuggle explosives onto airplanes. Here is a partial list of 2017 attempts:
There were also about 4,000 guns that TSA seized in 2017 when stupid jackoffs (mostly rappers, professional athletes and Republican officials) tried carrying them onto a plane.
People also like to bring inert explosive devices onto planes for some reason. A bunch of inert hand grenades, claymores, suicide vests and other goodies were seized in 2017. Also, throwing stars, daggers disguised as hairbrushes and tons of other whacky shit.
https://www.tsa.gov/blog/2018/...
In America, we allow MAGA hat-wearing goofballs on psychoactive meds to dump lead directly into our schoolchildren, because some 18th century amendment said well-regulated militias should be armed.
Therre are 40 prisoners in Gitmo.
Good, then we can also agree to stop the hundreds of millions of birds that are killed by hunters in Texas every year? Not to mention what the metals in the birdshot are doing to the water and land there.
See? We're finding common ground left and right today!