Fair enough - if you go the "simplest possible" route, you're likely to experience only a handful of severe edge-case problems. But that still leaves you with a dead end if you do need to add features like file attachment or full-text search or administration privileges later, and find out your design was too primitive to be easily extendable.
Also, BBcode parsing alone is an extremely complex problem if you care at all about document validity or accessibility. The illusion that you can simply throw a few regular expressions at the text will quickly be dispelled.
The idea of "bloat" in an established project is basically "not invented here" writ large. Anything that seriously impacts performance (unlike, say, size of the code base, which is an irrelevant metric if the design is at all sane and loads code on-demand), will eventually get fixed.
then back to the center to have a chance in the final election... I don't think anyone could have done that job any better than Mitt did
I'm aware I don't watch the same news as most Republicans, but I got the reverse impression. Before he won the primaries he actually did look more moderate than Rick Santorum and Rick Perry. After winning the primaries he picked Ryan, got recorded with the "47%" remark, spoke out more strongly against gay marriage and Planned Parenthood.
Was honestly wondering why he seemed to feel the need to appease the far right instead of the center after already winning the primaries. My only guess was that he feared the far right might get too disgusted with the election to vote if he came off as moderate.
Slashdot Mirror
For free content.
Zero problems with it.
If you want my money and my data? Fuck that.
Wait, are they planning to explore the Moon or Uranus?
Now let me go get my canoe; need to be at the office soon.
or OJ for short
Who even uses GIF anymore?
You can swab my tongue when you wrench it out of my cold, dead, mouth.
The makers guaranteed that the rate of false positives was only one in 8000. :-P
No shit?
Try getting out of a murder conviction by telling the judge your victim was a proven murderer, so killing the victim was legal.
See how that works out.
Because if there is one company that really stands up for standards, it's Microsoft.
In fact, sometimes they pay millions to get them through the ISO.
(I'm confused as to whether the dollar signs indicate bribery or that $facts and $viewpoints are variables in a Perl/PHP script. :P )
They must have realized that it made sense. Can't have any of that.
Religious nutcases, both Jewish and Christian, for different reasons. "Rebuild temple of Solomon" is on the doomsday checklists of a lot of cults.
He was driving on the Autobahn 8, but on a segment limited to 100km/h.
I don't think I've ever seen so much waffling outside an IHOP.
Good one.
If I were, do you think my phrases would be this coherent? I'd be all about methodologies for synergistically levering core competencies.
Fair enough - if you go the "simplest possible" route, you're likely to experience only a handful of severe edge-case problems. But that still leaves you with a dead end if you do need to add features like file attachment or full-text search or administration privileges later, and find out your design was too primitive to be easily extendable.
Also, BBcode parsing alone is an extremely complex problem if you care at all about document validity or accessibility. The illusion that you can simply throw a few regular expressions at the text will quickly be dispelled.
The idea of "bloat" in an established project is basically "not invented here" writ large. Anything that seriously impacts performance (unlike, say, size of the code base, which is an irrelevant metric if the design is at all sane and loads code on-demand), will eventually get fixed.
That's between them and their employer, not the organizer of the event they're covering, isn't it?
Can you imagine being asked to cover an event, but only allowed to write 6300 characters about it?
And also danube tulips and actualize green colorless radishes furiously.
What's so nonsensical about that?
Because that worked out so well for him last time.
I'm aware I don't watch the same news as most Republicans, but I got the reverse impression. Before he won the primaries he actually did look more moderate than Rick Santorum and Rick Perry. After winning the primaries he picked Ryan, got recorded with the "47%" remark, spoke out more strongly against gay marriage and Planned Parenthood.
Was honestly wondering why he seemed to feel the need to appease the far right instead of the center after already winning the primaries. My only guess was that he feared the far right might get too disgusted with the election to vote if he came off as moderate.
I'm conflicted whether Obama's response should be:
or
hides you from blasts of intense cancer.
Regurgitating badly research facts is what our brains are best at.