I was at first shocked at how realistic this was, but then I realized that I probably was thinking that because they didn't model as a young Japanese woman with perfect skin. Seriously, there are so many robot heads modelled that way, real young Japanese women are almost starting to seem robotic.
It is also illegal in many states in the U.S. to use the "far left" or passing lane on a major highway as a travelling lane (as opposed to passing), or to fail to yield to faster moving traffic that is attempting to overtake in that lane. For example, Colorado's "Left Lane Law" states:
A person shall not drive a motor vehicle in the passing lane of a highway if the speed-limit is sixty-five miles per hour or more unless such person is passing other motor-vehicles that are in a non-passing lane...
Somebody doing the legal speed limit in the left lane is very fucking clearly not using the left lane for it's intended purpose, passing. Exceeding the legal speed limit during passing isn't only legal damn near anywhere that had driving laws, it's the responsible thing to do. Fuck, in some states travelling the speed limit in the left lane is explicitly against the fucking law.
The root of the problems being described here are fucking idiots such as yourself, who lack a mature understanding of how to handle yourself on the road.
A mentioned earlier in this discussion by another participant, the two are not distinguishable in any meaningful way.
I won't bore you by repeating the distinction, though I will say that my comment still holds true (you are still making yourself look bad), and I will furthermore argue that you don't use bombs to wipe out political movements. You use bombs to wipe out people.
You can substitute "fuck" with just about anything you wish, and it is still a common English idiom. For example:
"Now what in the world were you saying again?" "Now what the heck were you saying again?"
Or even simply:
"Now what were you saying again?"
All of these have the same meaning, which you seem to have completely missed. The so called 'profanity' is not intended to give offence, merely provide emphasis, and therefore should not be considered an indication of rudeness.
Let me guess, you teach "How to lose credibility in online discussions 101" at your local university.
Regardless of what you think about the matter, you don't flat out defend "wiping zionists off the face of the earth". Not if you expect anybody to take you seriously.
By railroading this guy, what the Muskegon County Prosecutor is actually doing is weakening the severity of real child abuse in the public's mind by diluting it with dumb but ultimately harmless comedy.
Gee, I wonder why he would possibly want to do that....
Show it's repeatable in anything approaching reasonable rigorous scientific conditions, and perhaps I'll consider doing something other than laughing in your face about what a gullible idiot you are.
He's a fascist fuck. Isn't that obvious?
I was at first shocked at how realistic this was, but then I realized that I probably was thinking that because they didn't model as a young Japanese woman with perfect skin. Seriously, there are so many robot heads modelled that way, real young Japanese women are almost starting to seem robotic.
It's not destroying shit, it's just dazzling the cameras.
Are lasers and IR LEDs now illegal?
You were saying?
Somebody doing the legal speed limit in the left lane is very fucking clearly not using the left lane for it's intended purpose, passing. Exceeding the legal speed limit during passing isn't only legal damn near anywhere that had driving laws, it's the responsible thing to do. Fuck, in some states travelling the speed limit in the left lane is explicitly against the fucking law.
The root of the problems being described here are fucking idiots such as yourself, who lack a mature understanding of how to handle yourself on the road.
From the introduction section of the article you supposedly read:
Not only do other countries launch to the ISS, they do so regularly.
The new thinkpads coming out late march will still have modems.
And why not, they probably cost pennies in components these days.
What the shit does age have to do with it?
Well, I suppose politeness is in the eye of the beholder.
A mentioned earlier in this discussion by another participant, the two are not distinguishable in any meaningful way.
I won't bore you by repeating the distinction, though I will say that my comment still holds true (you are still making yourself look bad), and I will furthermore argue that you don't use bombs to wipe out political movements. You use bombs to wipe out people.
You can substitute "fuck" with just about anything you wish, and it is still a common English idiom. For example:
"Now what in the world were you saying again?"
"Now what the heck were you saying again?"
Or even simply:
"Now what were you saying again?"
All of these have the same meaning, which you seem to have completely missed. The so called 'profanity' is not intended to give offence, merely provide emphasis, and therefore should not be considered an indication of rudeness.
The more you know!
Let me guess, you teach "How to lose credibility in online discussions 101" at your local university.
Regardless of what you think about the matter, you don't flat out defend "wiping zionists off the face of the earth". Not if you expect anybody to take you seriously.
I'm not really sure that you are one to be complaining about mistranslations. "Now what the fuck were you saying again?" is a common English idiom.
Just what the world needs, another reason to shoot at hospital ships. Real smart.
Nobody gives a shit about your stupid games.
"booo hooo, somebody cheated on my stupid little game"
Shut up, grow up, and get a life. Fucking moron.
Yeah, clearly this is a waste of effort and they should have spent their resources making a drone submarine to pick up drowned people.
No.
The parents may sue him for failing to get signed model releases if they like. Accusing him of being a sexual predator is a perversion of the system.
By railroading this guy, what the Muskegon County Prosecutor is actually doing is weakening the severity of real child abuse in the public's mind by diluting it with dumb but ultimately harmless comedy.
Gee, I wonder why he would possibly want to do that....
There is no such thing as "the abuse of free speech". The whole concept of protecting speech is to ensure that speech you don't like is protected.
This all said, I wish anonymous the best of luck, though still believe that nothing short of a good rifle will ever shut the WBC up.
Show it's repeatable in anything approaching reasonable rigorous scientific conditions, and perhaps I'll consider doing something other than laughing in your face about what a gullible idiot you are.
Iron age is being kind. The passages these morons most often cite are more likely bronze age.
Binary "us vs them" politics? check
Base your worldview off american media? check
Presumptuous cunt? check
You are more stereotypically "American" than most redneck flaghumpers I know.
I've always suspected that Steve Mann was at least somewhat an inspiration for the character Manfred Maxx in Charles Stross's Accelerando.