Slashdot Mirror


User: Sir_Lewk

Sir_Lewk's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,649
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,649

  1. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    You're right. Software isn't math. Turing, Church, Knuth, etc were all wrong for all of those years!

    Westlake has proven them wrong and defied solid logic and mathematics with the simple words: "Math and logic are simply tools - as accessible to the machinist as they are to the programmer."! Stop the presses and re-write the math books, westlake has changed everything!

    For his next act westlake is going to solve world hunger by suggesting that everyone without bread simply eat cake!

  2. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    The government royally fucks something up and acts illogically. News at 11. ...doesn't make it right.

  3. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    You could say the same thing about physical inventions

    There is a difference between "describe-able with math" and "is math".

    I can't speak to what should or shouldn't be patentable under current law

    Ahhh..... Not really sure why I am bothering to have this conversation in that case.

  4. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    Yeah, no kidding. These loons would apparently see nothing wrong with Pythagoras patenting his little theorem back in the day either. Truly boggles the mind.

  5. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    Actually, the USPTO no longer lets you patent perpetual motion machines.

    You are out of date on this subject, I'd take the time to catch up if I were you...

    Furthermore, Mathematics is not universally considered a science. and "being real science" is not the one and only test of patentability.

  6. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    More links for you, because I'm feeling generous (and bored):

    Tones of links at groklaw, more than a few that take the "software is math" angle
    A very blunt, and to the point page from End Soft Patents.

    I did not just make this argument up off the top of my head. I promise you I'm not that creative. It is a very common argument, and generally considered to be very strong, since it's a pretty damned simple logical statement: A = B, B != C, thus A != C. You could find elementary school students to explain it to you I'm sure.

  7. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 1

    Well then congratulations. You have discovered why people don't like software patents and have completed your quest for knowledge. Happy yet?

    Also, it should be noted that stopsoftwarepatents.eu is of course an EU website. You'll note that more American centric commentary often brings up the non-patent-ability of math.

    Citation: Donald Knuth

    To a computer scientist, this makes no sense, because every algorithm is as mathematical as anything could be. An algorithm is an abstract concept unrelated to physical laws of the universe.

    http://progfree.org/Patents/knuth-to-pto.txt

    For more examples of this argument being made, see EndSoftPatents.org.

  8. Re:Patent risks on H.264 vs. Theora — Fightin' Words About Patentability · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You keep on bring this up. The answer is, and always will be, because software is math. Under US patent law math is not supposed to be patentable.

    You might not agree with this, but that is in fact why most of us argue that software should not be patentable. I suspect you confuse comprehension with agreement.

  9. Re:This is all wrong. on It's Time To Split Up NSA Between Spooks and Geeks · · Score: 1

    I don't deny any of it. All I'm saying is that "disbanding" the NSA won't stop any of it. They'll just change their name and set up shop completely secretly, just like before.

    In one extreme case they even wiretapped a congressmen while he was overseas.

    Really? You consider that an extreme case? If anyone needs to be wiretapped it's the corrupt US politicians who are responsible for all of this, and if wire-tapping should be occurring anywhere, it should be occurring outside the country...

  10. Re:I hope so. on Will ACTA Be Found Unconstitutional? · · Score: 1

    Read the post I was replying to. He specifically stated that he was modded troll while another was not. Those were the two posts I was saying should have been modded offtopic.

    we've simply gotten off on a tangent like people do in real life

    Hence an offtopic moderation... Deliberate attempts to derail conversations get a troll mod.

  11. Re:This is all wrong. on It's Time To Split Up NSA Between Spooks and Geeks · · Score: 1

    The entire idea behind the NSA, that the American people need to be spied on

    Who ever said that was the entire idea behind the NSA? You do realize that the NSA spies on other countries as well? Just ban them from listening in on Americans, as an official policy, and don't worry about it.

    Besides, it's not like disbanding the NSA would actually do anything. There is a reason people say NSA stands for No Such Agency...

  12. Re:ISPs are not wild about the idea. on Major 'Net Players Mulling IPv6 Whitelist · · Score: 1

    What makes you think people won't still use stateful firewalls with IPv6?

  13. Re:Uh, isn't that covered in the constitution alre on Will ACTA Be Found Unconstitutional? · · Score: 1

    I'm one person out of ~309 million. For all practical purposes, I have no capacity to fight this zeitgeist.

    So was Gandhi. Imagine if all of the great leaders in this world had simply said that?

  14. Re:I hope so. on Will ACTA Be Found Unconstitutional? · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Both of you were modded unfairly. You both should have gotten -1 Offtopic.

  15. Re:Huh? on Nvidia Drops Support For Its Open Source Driver · · Score: 1

    To hell with that shit, just install elinks.

    Who even needs X these days?

  16. Re:So, its a marketing label only on Energy Star Program Certifies 15 Out of 20 Bogus Products · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should tax having sex. After all, babies are made of carbon.

  17. Re:Bad move.... on Nvidia Drops Support For Its Open Source Driver · · Score: 1

    If you are using an up-to-date Fedora install, why not just use the Nouveau driver? Far better than 'nv' from what I understand...

  18. Re:Huh? on Nvidia Drops Support For Its Open Source Driver · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Television Advertisement: "So use your computer to go to [PRODUCT WEBSITE] today!"
    msauve: "What does this mean? Is my "computer" now a web browser?"

    PROTIP: Substituting idiocy for pedantry doesn't make you look cool. Not even on slashdot.

  19. Re:Bad move.... on Nvidia Drops Support For Its Open Source Driver · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are not discontinuing support for their proprietary driver, just their open source driver, which has always been crap. If you want good 3d performance you can still use (and always should have been using) their proprietary driver.

    I know, I know. You were just making a crack about how nobody uses linux...

  20. Re:Huh? on Nvidia Drops Support For Its Open Source Driver · · Score: 1

    No, they mean you should use the VESA driver so you can fire up a GUI browser and go to their website.

    I sure hope you are being purposely obtuse.

  21. Re:Whitelist, not blacklist! on US House Passes P2P Ban On Federal Networks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly there are only two options:

    • Use a Microsoft OS.
    • Write your own in Ada.
  22. Re:Irony: Adobe and Java updaters targeted on New Malware Overwrites Software Updaters · · Score: 1
  23. Re:The Best Kind of News on We're Staying In China, Says Microsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comparing China and Cuba like that is idiotic. Cuba is indeed socialist, but China is far more capitalist. Arguably moreso than we are.

    Also, are you kidding? You really don't see any differences between feudalism and socialism? I pray I read that wrong...

  24. Re:Can we get rid of SSL now please? on Government Could Forge SSL Certificates · · Score: 1

    The layer encryption is done on is really irrelevant to this issue, it is the trust model that is broken.

  25. Re:oh no on Tracking Pedophiles By Their Typing Habits · · Score: 1

    MOD PARENT UP +1 IRONY