Please remember that in the above posts, USC Title 17 104 uses the language "fair use" in itself. Thus, fair use has been codified in American law. This may not mean much, but hey, what can you do about it?
On the other hand, I, for one, welcome our new RIAA lawyer overlords.
But did he? That's the important question. And I asked about Second Life because that was the kind of VC->RLC->VC exchange I was trying to draw a comparison to.
There is no way that this money can be converted back into RLC (real life currency.) If there was a way, and he did, then he could easily be punished under fraud/racketeering laws. But again, IANAL.
What was the name of that MMORPG that would let you move game currency into the real world and vice-versa?
Has it ever occured to you that perhaps advertisers may very well have an agenda they funnel through the press, via which stories they tell? Imbalance is not due to bias; it is due to corporate greed.
If you get a court order with the wrong date somewhere in the order (in the future), can't you say that the order makes no sense, because the crime couldn't have taken place yet? From the order: Data was first deleted in December 2006.
Date has not yet occured, therefore, one could argue that the order is irrelevant. Like most here, IANAL.
Didn't you read the article? The HIV-1 cells they injected were genetically engineered not to have the ill effects of HIV/AIDS. So they were meant to, in all actuality, be like the HIV/AIDS of deadly reputation, but without the threat of lawsuits waiting in the wings.
We know that HIV is the virus which mutates into AIDS. Proof enough? It's like an axiom. Accepted without proof, because we already know it to be true.
I still don't believe it's admissable regardless.
A statement like that, without being a deposition or sworn testimony, is hearsay. Only the deathbed declaration (and other exceptions) are admissable in court.
(IANAL.)
But they can't do that. It's illegal (in the States) to continue a court case once the defendant is deceased. I forget the legalese for it right now, but it's here somewhere...
Beslan wasn't Islamic jihadists. It was the machination of a Chechen warlord, who's now dead (thank god.)
My middle school had a silent auction for the survivors/victim's families. We raised $3500.
Slashdot Mirror
After all, it doesn't pose a problem for firewalls. And then where will we be?
These are satellite images, right? So WTF are bugs doing in space?
On the other hand, I, for one, welcome our new RIAA lawyer overlords.
But did he? That's the important question.
And I asked about Second Life because that was the kind of VC->RLC->VC exchange I was trying to draw a comparison to.
What was the name of that MMORPG that would let you move game currency into the real world and vice-versa?
The DoE inquisition!
Let's see: Some plays im writing, a screenplay, my screenwriting software, and some essential Windows apps.
And you really, truly believe that using PETA videos are the best way to go about this?
What are you, a hippee? Oh wait...
And may I remind the readers of the following passage (citation unknown):
He who is without sin may cast the first stone.
A book I have lying around somewhere in my house. I'll have to find it.
Speaking of advertisements:
Has it ever occured to you that perhaps advertisers may very well have an agenda they funnel through the press, via which stories they tell? Imbalance is not due to bias; it is due to corporate greed.
But are you sure, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these allegations are false?
If you get a court order with the wrong date somewhere in the order (in the future), can't you say that the order makes no sense, because the crime couldn't have taken place yet?
From the order: Data was first deleted in December 2006.
Date has not yet occured, therefore, one could argue that the order is irrelevant.
Like most here, IANAL.
The religious get away with this, mate? Never heard any of them use it before.
And besides, it has been done before in the scientific community. Why do you so willingly accept mathematics basics?
Absolutely serious. What, did you think I was trying to scare you or something?
You dare to propogate a medical lie? A lie on the same magnitude and absurdity as Holocaust denial/revisionism?
I will have none of it. Get out. Now
OK, fine. Maybe perhaps my choice of words wasn't the best. But I wasn't quite ready to feed the troll yet. So I chose a different word.
I atone for my sins.
Didn't you read the article? The HIV-1 cells they injected were genetically engineered not to have the ill effects of HIV/AIDS. So they were meant to, in all actuality, be like the HIV/AIDS of deadly reputation, but without the threat of lawsuits waiting in the wings.
Any questions?
We know that HIV is the virus which mutates into AIDS. Proof enough? It's like an axiom. Accepted without proof, because we already know it to be true.
I was unaware.
I still don't believe it's admissable regardless. A statement like that, without being a deposition or sworn testimony, is hearsay. Only the deathbed declaration (and other exceptions) are admissable in court. (IANAL.)
My bad. Got submitted before the IANAL was added.
But they can't do that. It's illegal (in the States) to continue a court case once the defendant is deceased. I forget the legalese for it right now, but it's here somewhere...
Beslan wasn't Islamic jihadists. It was the machination of a Chechen warlord, who's now dead (thank god.) My middle school had a silent auction for the survivors/victim's families. We raised $3500.
Not really. I was thinking more along the lines of the Monty Python sketch, "The four Yorkshiremen".