Slashdot Mirror


Giant Insect Invades Germany

Noryungi writes, "It seems the alien invasion of the Earth has just started! A 50-meter insect has been spotted roaming the German countryside! Let the 'I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords' joke contest begin!" A moderator at a Keyhole forum IDs the bug as a thrip, about 1mm long, squished under a glass plate during scanning.

264 comments

  1. No... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems the alien invasion of the Earth has just started!

    No.. it's really Richard Branson's newest Eco-Friendly transportation mode. See, we'll strap seats to the backs of these giant genetically modified insects and they'll run us or fly us anywhere we want to go. What could possibly go wrong?

    microsoft europe strenuously denied it was a bug from their code, "ours are a few metres smaller."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:No... by Rockinsockindune · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or we can plant a thumper (they are attracted to rythmic vibrations), and use hooks and ropes to climb to the tops of their backs.

      --
      I abuse commas, I cannot help myself.
    2. Re:No... by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      If you think of how many thousands of times more efficient insects are at converting chemical energy to kinetic energy than our methods, particularly when it comes to acceleration, then maybe he is on to something!

    3. Re:No... by ackthpt · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or we can plant a thumper (they are attracted to rythmic vibrations), and use hooks and ropes to climb to the tops of their backs.

      I heard that was one of the possible scenarios for after privatising the tube*

      * London underground

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:No... by diablomonic · · Score: 4, Informative

      lets see, chemical to kinetic, hmmm.. battery efficiency: maybe 90% on each of charge and discharge, lets say 80% overall. electric motor efficiency, good ones are >90%. total efficiency: >70%. thousands of times more than this: 70,000% efficiency..... LISA! in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

      --
      watch "the money masters" on google video
    5. Re:No... by griffjon · · Score: 5, Funny

      The European community have known about this bug (and there are many others) for years now. Why do you think they're so solidly against genetically modified food? This is a Thwips Monsantoi

      (btw, I'm joking, but just to be safe, I for one welcome our new genetically-modified-food-created insectile pooping overlords!)

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    6. Re:No... by Ziwcam · · Score: 0

      Yes, but where does all that electricity to charge those batterys come from? My bet would be on "coal fired power plant" which is not nearly as efficient.

    7. Re:No... by sporkme · · Score: 1

      This article on the physiological properties of b-movie monsters sparked a pretty good discussion about the possibility of massive insects. The larger an organism, the more effective the vascular system has to be. Simply scaling up an organism does not give you a living result.

    8. Re:No... by TankerJoe19K · · Score: 1

      See, we'll strap seats to the backs of these giant genetically modified insects and they'll run us or fly us anywhere we want to go.

      Europe == Morrowind?

    9. Re:No... by malsdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you missed several steps out, mainly the difficult part which involves generating and delivering energy to the batteries (which btw are an extra unnecessary step). Start off with a naturally available source of chemical energy and the efficiency rate will totally plummet.

      To prove the point: try find a car, (non-electric) train, plane or any form of mechanised transport which acheives >70% effiency!

      Lastly, something which is 1,000 times more efficient that a 70% efficient motor isn't 70,000% efficient, it is just extremely close to 100% efficient (which means that those annoying thermodynamic laws are kept in check).

    10. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except cells are only a bit more efficient at turning food into raw energy than coal plants are. A cell converts glucose to energy at about 36-40% efficiency; a modern coal plant can do about 30%.

    11. Re:No... by jnik · · Score: 1

      any form of mechanised transport which acheives >70% effiency!
      Bicycle. Wikipedia claims 88-99% efficiency for a derailer drivetrain (not including metabolic efficiency, obviously). Transportation efficiency is fairly hard to quantify, since power in vs. power out is less useful than passenger-miles or pound-miles. But by just about any measure, a bicycle is a highly efficient mechanism, beating out most of nature.

    12. Re:No... by newt0311 · · Score: 1

      cool. but will these guys behave like the worms when we pull on their backs or will they have to be trained?

    13. Re:No... by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    14. Re:No... by speederaser · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered how the bicycle's efficiency would measure up if the energy to build the roads is taken into account. Sure, you can ride on unimproved trails in the wilderness but how efficient is that?

    15. Re:No... by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      Using our convenient Earth Maggot saddles... [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138813/]

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    16. Re:No... by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, *World Maggot.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    17. Re:No... by eonlabs · · Score: 1

      Chi Chian used hollow worms

      --
      I wouldn't consider the mad hatter mad. Just reality impaired. He sure can make a mean cup of tea.
    18. Re:No... by Sillygates · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    19. Re:No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS... Since when is a battery even close to 90% efficiency?

    20. Re:No... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      With insects, on top of circulatory problems, breathing would also be difficult since most don't "actively" breath. So the 1m wingspan dragonfly probably was the best nature could do.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    21. Re:No... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yes but what's the efficiency of putting energy into coal in first place?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    22. Re:No... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      If only bicycles were to ride on the roads, they'd only need to be 12 feet wide, very thin, and would last forever.

    23. Re:No... by binkzz · · Score: 1

      "I am God ...try prove otherwise."

      God uses correct grammar.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    24. Re:No... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Do you doubt your God? Shol'va!

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    25. Re:No... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      It's about damn time Germany gets access to the silt strider network. Hopefully that'll make the route Berlin-Vivec a bit faster to travel.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    26. Re:No... by PEdelman · · Score: 1

      Ah...I already wondered where all these ghost cars came from...

      --
      Like science? Comics? Wicked...
      Funny By Nature
    27. Re:No... by Matt+Edd · · Score: 1

      God is obviously asain.

    28. Re:No... by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Funny
      If only bicycles were to ride on the roads, they'd only need to be 12 feet wide, very thin, and would last forever.

      They wouldn't last long under a stampede of 50 meter giant insects.

    29. Re:No... by zish · · Score: 1

      Doctor Fun had this envisioned earlier this year! Mr. Virgin owes David Farley some royalties due to prior art!

      --
      Spork.

      P.S. Spork.
    30. Re:No... by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      That's fine for now, but the problems start when the worms start turning the planet into a desert.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
    31. Re:No... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      These kinds of errors happen routinely, between overlaps, bad seams, etc... For example several people have a 'found' a Russian sub sunk at the pier, when in fact you can plainly see that it is the seam between two different sets of images. (It's even more obvious in Google Earth.)

    32. Re:No... by l33t_f33t · · Score: 1

      It doesn't...Batteries are chemical reactions retard.

    33. Re:No... by teknopagan · · Score: 1

      Ha'shak, kree! Lo tak meta satak Oz! To'na a'kel no'tar. Zoya noc shom!

      --
      The Russian Mafia will mod you down just to see if the Moderate button works.
    34. Re:No... by Rockinsockindune · · Score: 1

      If there were any book universe/world that I would wish our world was more like, it would have to be Dune for me. With all it's downfalls, I think we may all be a little better off loosing our water-fat and being a little more like the Fremen.

      --
      I abuse commas, I cannot help myself.
  2. Ich fur ein... by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Willkommen unsere neuen Insekt overlords

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:Ich fur ein... by isnochys · · Score: 0

      Please don't mention the war..
      but we would say:
      Heil, Insektenführer!

    2. Re:Ich fur ein... by fmobus · · Score: 1
  3. That's pretty cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder what other shit like that is in google maps.

    1. Re:That's pretty cool. by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      I remember a story a couple of years ago about MSN Virtual Earth denying the existance of the Apple headquaters.

      http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/25/ 1856220 is the Slashdot article on it.

    2. Re:That's pretty cool. by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      Proof that Apple is taking over the world.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    3. Re:That's pretty cool. by Ziwcam · · Score: 0

      Link broken for me. Try again. I must see this "proof"

    4. Re:That's pretty cool. by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      latitude: -30.51635182698483
      longitude: 121.3369736498427

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    5. Re:That's pretty cool. by jkauzlar · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, but I don't see it.

  4. Nitpick... by celardore · · Score: 1
    The post at the Keyhole forums says:
    Thrips is the singular and plural - like fish (I just found this out from an article in Google Sightseeing which referenced this article) Wikipedia - thrips

    They're called Thrips with an S
    1. Re:Nitpick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's spreading FUD through the old wiki, thrips can get inside your screen!

  5. I checked the photo and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That doesn't look anything like Germany.

    1. Re:I checked the photo and by doti · · Score: 3, Informative

      Zoom out, put in map mode, and you'll se it's in the same country as Berlin, so it's Germany.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    2. Re:I checked the photo and by Main+Gauche · · Score: 3, Funny

      "That doesn't look anything like Germany."

      Because in Germany, bugs don't leave their excrement in the middle of a nice clean field like that?

      Ok, I admit it. You got modded both +1 Funny and +1 Informative, and I'm left very confused. Not by the usual random moderation, mind you, but by what I'm supposed to be thinking right now....

  6. Bugs! by The+Outbreak+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Google Maps still has some bugs.

    1. Re:Bugs! by tonyr1988 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Time to bring it back to beta for a while . . .

    2. Re:Bugs! by stunt_penguin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think they should leave this one in for posterity, and call it a feature......... as if anyone's going to take it's presence too seriously :)

      It's got more value as a cool link than a fixed bug.... I hope someone's got a sense of humor ^^

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    3. Re:Bugs! by naapo · · Score: 1

      It's not a bug, it's a feature.

    4. Re:Bugs! by Skywings · · Score: 1

      Yes, a very large geographic feature, that moves.

    5. Re:Bugs! by Darren+Hiebert · · Score: 1

      Isn't all Google software still in beta?

  7. Joke contest? by captnitro · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Let the 'I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords' joke contest begin!

    Oh, let's not.

    Alternatively, everybody can get it out of their systems today if I never have to hear it again.
    1. Re:Joke contest? by joe+155 · · Score: 1

      alright,

      "I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords!"

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Joke contest? by overacid · · Score: 1

      A-fucking-MEN to that.

    3. Re:Joke contest? by lottameez · · Score: 1

      oh sure, but does it run linux? Nothing to see here, move along you beowulf cluster. In korea, only old people would find this funny.

      Frist!

      --
      Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
    4. Re:Joke contest? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm tired of it too. It used to be funny, but now it's achieved the same worn-out status that "automagically" always had.

      Besides, it wasn't even the funniest insect line in the episode. Which was: "Freedom! Horrible, horrible freedom!"

    5. Re:Joke contest? by blue+trane · · Score: 1

      OK!!! Wait...how are you going to enforce the compact? Honesty? MUAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

    6. Re:Joke contest? by mikiN · · Score: 1

      ...but I want to port NetBSD to it, you insensitive clod!

      This just in: Duke Nukem Forever will be released for this platform first...in Japan! NetCraft confirms it!

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, CAMERA BUGS YOU!

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  8. Is it a Bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bugs taste bettter

  9. Works great in Google Earth too by jessohyes · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just paste in 48.857699 ,10.205451

    Jess

    1. Re:Works great in Google Earth too by Mini-Geek · · Score: 1

      or look for 48 degrees 51'28" N 10 degrees 12'19" E

      --
      do {print "Mini-Geek Rules!\n";}
      until ($TheEndOfTheWorld);
    2. Re:Works great in Google Earth too by Psykosys · · Score: 2, Funny

      But do they have 3d data for it?

    3. Re:Works great in Google Earth too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But do they have 3d data for it?

      What for? The bug was squished in the scanner, that kind of makes it 2D...

  10. bug.. by rojebrio · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There seems to be a "bug" in the Google Maps software..

  11. -insert standard joke- by McFortner · · Score: 1

    ....nah, too easy.

    --
    Beware of Sales Reps bearing gifts.
  12. Way to spoil the joke by spoco2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know... I don't think it was really neccessary to have right there in the heading the little note that it's some tiny bug squished during the scanning process.

    The fact it was posted with the Monty Python foot should be enough for anyone to know it shouldn't be taken seriously.

    We could have had hundreds, if not thousands, of posts as to exactly what it could all mean, how it got there, why it was taking a large dump at the time of the photo...

    But now... now you've ruined it.

    I hope you're happy... go and sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

    1. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't think it was really neccessary to have right there in the heading the little note that it's some tiny bug squished during the scanning process.

      Of course it was. It's what they want us to think. If they didn't put that idea in our heads, we'd be free to think about what really happened.

    2. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We could have had hundreds, if not thousands, of posts as to exactly what it could all mean, how it got there, why it was taking a large dump at the time of the photo...

      <jeffgoldblumvoice>
      "That is one big pile of shit!"
      </jeffgoldblumvoice>

    3. Re:Way to spoil the joke by nwbvt · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The fact it was posted with the Monty Python foot should be enough for anyone to know it shouldn't be taken seriously."

      So if they didn't include the Monty Python foot, people would have seriously thought there was a giant bug in Germany?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    4. Re:Way to spoil the joke by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally, I'm not entirely sold on this whole "insect stuck in the scanner" story. I smell coverup.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    5. Re:Way to spoil the joke by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      :D

      That amused me.

    6. Re:Way to spoil the joke by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      Man.... I saw the foot and initially thought "holy fuck, that's an insanely huge ass bug."

      Alcohol. Heh.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:Way to spoil the joke by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Given that your post is (currently) modded "Score:3, Informative", you aren't alone...

    8. Re:Way to spoil the joke by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I agree. If you zoom out three or four times, it's still there. Did they use the exact same picture to scan from at such radically different zooms? I find it unbelievable.

    9. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 2, Funny

      New Volkswagon SUV?

      (Ok sorry, latenight at work)

    10. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, let's be practical here. It could be a big model designed to advertise fertiliser to passers-by. Or a children's ride. Or a carnival float or something.

    11. Re:Way to spoil the joke by ArtStone · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you look just to the west of the Alien Bug, you'll see the town named Aalen.

      A coincidence? I think not.

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
    12. Re:Way to spoil the joke by MikeTheMan · · Score: 1

      This guy is suggesting there's a coverup about a 50m insect and it got modded Insightful?

    13. Re:Way to spoil the joke by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was going for funny. The insightful and interesting mods scare me a little. It could be a couple of mods with a subtle sense of humor though.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    14. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Dissenter · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for this one to come up on the MetaModerator list. Insightful eh?? (News Anchor Voice) "Yes mooingyak, thank you for that keen observation into the latest terror plots against the world. And now a word from our sponsor Terminex." (/News Anchor Voice)

      --

      Dissenter
      "There is no knowledge that is not power."

    15. Re:Way to spoil the joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modding funny doesn't give a karma bonus, so some mods will give insightful or informative instead.

  13. Other OB by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Re:Ich fur ein...... Willkommen unsere neuen Insekt overlords

    In Soviet Russia Google Maps bug YOU!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      A real German would say:

      Wir heissen unsere Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen! :)

    2. Re:Other OB by hmccabe · · Score: 1

      I wish I could mod this as "actually funny." H.

    3. Re:Other OB by PresidentEnder · · Score: 4, Funny
      Wir heißen unsere neue Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen!

      Letztes Jahr gab keine Insektenüberlordschaften.

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    4. Re:Other OB by Tavor · · Score: 1

      Soviet Russia... East Germany... same difference.

      --
      Windows has detected an undetectable error.
    5. Re:Other OB by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Whatever! Pray our new Insect Overlords understand the languages of ours, lowly earthlings!

      Just in case:

      Eu, da minha parte, dou boas-vindas aos nosos novos Senhores Insetos!

      On my knees!

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    6. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The correct translation (as literal as possible, as interpreting as necessary) is:
      "Ich zumindest heisse unsere neuen Insektenoberherrscher willkommen!"

      I = Ich
      for one = zumindest (in this context)
      welcome = heisse ... willkommen
      our = unsere
      new = neuen
      insect over-lords = Insekten-ober-herrscher

    7. Re:Other OB by ackthpt · · Score: 0

      Soviet Russia... East Germany... same difference.

      Well, comrade, in Soviet Russia it was a Cagey Bee, which is an insect and therefore a Bug.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:Other OB by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      no, it's a feature

    9. Re:Other OB by Lane.exe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sagen sie! Im Amerika gibt es ein Insekt overlord für sechs Jahre!

      --
      IAALS.
    10. Re:Other OB by Traa · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought you guys got rid of that "ß" thingy (eszett?) a while back?

    11. Re:Other OB by Lord+Aurora · · Score: 1
      FWIW, I got the joke.

      Considering most moderators are liberal, I'd say they either (a) can't speak German for shit, (b) totally missed the fact that you were talking about Bush, or (c) don't care about this topic anymore.

      Or maybe they're mad because you didn't use the present perfect of "gibt es," which made your joke kinda grammatically unsound.

      Excuse the analysis. It's been a long day. Nice joke. *pats on back*

      --
      The heavens do not fall for such a trifle.
    12. Re:Other OB by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      You wouldn't believe how many of those things are still filling up warehouses out in the country. Now that nobody wants them for official use any more they're practically free and poor people have been making up new words to use as many of them as they can.

    13. Re:Other OB by JayAEU · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wir heißen unsere neuen Insektenüberlordschaften willkommen!

      Gotta match the numerus on that adjective with the subject there... I like the sharp-s though. :)

    14. Re:Other OB by JayAEU · · Score: 1

      Not really. New german orthography makes less use of the ß (sharp-s as it's called natively).

      Note that there are also national differences. The Swiss for example don't have the ß at all and use ss everywhere instead.

    15. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ich koch ihren vater in einen ofen.

    16. Re:Other OB by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they're mad because you didn't use the present perfect of "gibt es," which made your joke kinda grammatically unsound.

      Well he did have an error, but in fact present perfect tense would make it even worse, since Germans only use that as an actual past tense. In fact the big error was using 'für' which is a typical error English speakers make in German, as well as the ordering, since the 'time' part of the phrase has to be moved up in the sentence; the rule of thumb in German sentence order is: "Time, manner, place". Then there's the inflections....

      So, instead of "Sagen sie! Im Amerika gibt es ein Insekt overlord für sechs Jahre!"

      it should be:

      "Sagen Sie! In Amerika gibt es seit sechs Jahren einen Insektenoberherr!"

      Disclaimer - I'm not a native speaker either, though I have lived in Germany for 11 years.

      In any case, I agree, good joke :-D

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    17. Re:Other OB by k2r · · Score: 1

      > insect over-lords = Insekten-ober-herrscher

      Since "insect overlords" is gender-neutral but "Insekten-ober-herrscher" is male and considering the fact that in many insect species the female is larger than the male I vote for the female form: "Insekten-ober-herrscherinnen" :-)

      k2r

    18. Re:Other OB by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      Nicht ein insekt, Ein Affe!!!!!!!

    19. Re:Other OB by Jeremiah+Stoddard · · Score: 1

      "Insect overlords" is male. I think "overladies" or something like that would be the feminine form. Then again, I don't think there's a specifically gender-neutral version of this in English, so "insect overlords" could effectively be used as the neuter. It has more of a terrifying sound anyway.

      But since anything sounds terrifying in German, I guess I can second the vote for using the feminine version.

    20. Re:Other OB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anscheinend braucht man nur einen deutschen Satz und das Wort "Overlord" um ein positives Karma abzukriegen. Ach ja, Ümläüte können auch nicht schadem, oder?

    21. Re:Other OB by k2r · · Score: 1

      > "Insect overlords" is male.

      I somehow managed not to see the "lord" part in "overlord"...

      Now I vote for "insect overladies" :-)

    22. Re:Other OB by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      So THAT's where the SS went...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    23. Re:Other OB by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

      'Now I vote for "insect overladies" :-)'

      You leaning toward Hillary or Condoleezza?

      --
      My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    24. Re:Other OB by PresidentEnder · · Score: 1
      I hate gendered adjective endings.

      I can afford to burn karma on an OT post- does anyone know the usual tendency of native Germans to accept the new "official" spellings? I tend to use the Eszett (sharp S, not sure of spelling, since I've only ever heard it pronounced, not spelled) because I like the look of it, not out of any ideological opposition to language change. I know the Swiss have always preferred "ss," but how is it elsewhere? Gibt es Deutschlaendern here on slashdot?

      --
      I used to carry a bottle of whiskey for snake bite. And two snakes. -Nefarious Wheel
    25. Re:Other OB by Lane.exe · · Score: 1

      This is what I get for not taking a German class for two years. (I minored in it.)

      --
      IAALS.
  14. absolutely preposterous by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    we all know giant (fill-in-the-blank) overlords always appear in japan first, specifically in tokyo

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:absolutely preposterous by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      no that appear first by nuclear power planes

    2. Re:absolutely preposterous by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1

      "I didn't even know what a nuclear panner plant was!"

      - Homer

      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
  15. fun by sporkme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here are two Escher-licious images from google maps:
    Boston
    Dallas

    ...and an interesting effect that can occur when frames are spliced:
    Sidewalk ends

    Of course, there are tons of these, including the popular ipod.

    1. Re:fun by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      There used to be an Escher-licious image situation for downtown Seattle wherein the good folks at Google felt the best way to deal with the buildings going in all different directions was to, well, "disappear" the building I work in. They've fixed it now, so I guess I don't need to submit this.

    2. Re:fun by alchemist68 · · Score: 1

      If you think those Escher-licious images from google maps are cool, check out the images of the buildings around the World Trade Center site in New York City. The tops of the buildings are going in all different directions.

    3. Re:fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh crap that made my head hurt.

    4. Re:fun by babbage · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One of my favorites is Versailles. Yes, that Versailles.

      Did you realize that the world's most famous palace, it's grounds, and the community in front of it are laid out like an enormous happy-face stick figure? Take a look at that aerial photo, then go back and look at the Google view -- it's obvious once you look for it. And this all goes back to, what, 1500s and earlier?

      It almost makes you think that the French first sent people up in hot-air balloons just so that they'd get a chance to see the joke that architects & urban planners had set up centuries earlier...

      :-)

    5. Re:fun by Cutriss · · Score: 1

      Here's another really neat example left behind by Google's integration of satellite imagery from Katrina:

      Link

      The bridge is washed out, yes, but Google didn't integrate satellite imagery for coastal Jackson County, so you have half a bridge. What's also interesting to note is that the Bay St. Louis bridge, west of the one seen in the above link, is also washed out, and Google previously had that imagery integrated as well, but it seems they've removed it, and now the only section of the MS coast seen post-Katrina is Biloxi-proper.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    6. Re:fun by tajmahall · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Expressionism:

      ... the Scream of the Chesapeake Bay.

  16. From the Googleplex by NetDrain · · Score: 5, Funny

    But from the Corp network, we have:

    http://theblight.net/misc/germany.jpg

    The Maps team is going to be -pissed.- It'll be awesome.

    1. Re:From the Googleplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing I've seen all week. You have to report it and post the report and the response on a blog somewhere so we can read about it in a slashback.

  17. This is News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If i step on a bug with my sneaker, take a picture of it and upload it to the internet, will I make the front page of slashdot too?

    1. Re:This is News? by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Host it on Google SneakerPics (LABS) and submit it. You're sure to profit.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:This is News? by C. · · Score: 1
      If i step on a bug with my sneaker, take a picture of it and upload it to the internet, will I make the front page of slashdot too?

      Yes, if your name is Google...
      --
      C.
    3. Re:This is News? by Plutonite · · Score: 0

      If you can amuse scores of thousands of geeks with it, then yes of course. Are you new here?

  18. 'Bugzilla' users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, so that's what they meant when they said they were using an in-house version of Bugzilla ?

  19. Let the boycott begin? by mlloyd67 · · Score: 1

    Isn't Google's motto "Don't be evil"? Is this promotion of squished bugs? Just wait until PETA hears of this...

  20. thrips by wguy00 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the bug be a thrips? FTA: Thrips is the singular and plural - like fish

  21. Man, your German is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    ... Willkommen unsere neuen Insekt overlords


    Das korrekte Wort ist Überlords !!
    1. Re:Man, your German is bad by SumoRoti · · Score: 0

      That's correct, I don't speak a good german, but that's it for überalles!!

    2. Re:Man, your German is bad by TransEurope · · Score: 1

      The correct word is "Herrscher", or if you want: "Überherrscher" ;)

      Ich für meine Wenigkeit heiße unseren neuen insektoiden Herrscher herzlich willkommen!

    3. Re:Man, your German is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Es war ein Witz!

    4. Re:Man, your German is bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Es war ein Witz!

      Wir machen hier keine Witze...

    5. Re:Man, your German is bad by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

      Verdammte Scheiße, und ich dachte, ich müßte nur länger auf die Pointe warten...

      --
      Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  22. Farfrromgnugen? by c0d3r · · Score: 1

    farfromgnugen?

    1. Re:Farfrromgnugen? by c0d3r · · Score: 1

      Isch Mir Scheiss Egal.

  23. Can anybody explain this one by tizan · · Score: 1, Redundant

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&z=19&ll=42.349 616,-71.072268&spn=0.001399,0.003712&t=h&om=1/ Please note the shadow of the trees underneath (hence you can guess where the sun is) and the image of the plane seems to be above the plane....I'm a bit baffled to explain this by simple optics.

  24. But, by Shadyman · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new RAID-wielding overlord killers.

    1. Re:But, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will harddisk arrays save the day!?

    2. Re:But, by chmod+a+x+mojo · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia a beowulf cluster of them weild Raid.

      --
      To err is human; effective mayhem requires the root password!
  25. ObSPQuote... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That kinda looks like... Tom Selleck!

  26. Shit like this really bugs me. by walmartshopper67 · · Score: 1

    ...alright i'll go hang myself after that really, really bad pun.

  27. the overlords are coming!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serve the hive!!!!!!!
    they control the groove......
    serve the hive...
    they control the way you move.

  28. Re: Big German insect...identified!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think it's a Volkswagen bug...

  29. Ooops Wrong Link by tizan · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Ooops Wrong Link by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    2. Re:Ooops Wrong Link by fstayloriv · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a link which describes the weird building anomalies: http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2005/12/fu nky_buildings.html

      --
      Frank Taylor - Google Earth Blog http://www.gearthblog.com/
    3. Re:Ooops Wrong Link by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      The wierd building anomalies was accidental on his part - his second link was a plane :)

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  30. As you can surely see by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    I'm a Frenchman. And a Spanishman.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
    1. Re:As you can surely see by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1

      No good. I've known too many Spaniards.

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    2. Re:As you can surely see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inconceivable

  31. That's Not a Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a fucking feature, alright?

    1. Re:That's Not a Bug by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Funny

      And here I thought you were going for "It's a space station!"

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:That's Not a Bug by k31bang · · Score: 1
      That's a fucking feature, alright?


      Damn right! Its a creature feature.
      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    3. Re:That's Not a Bug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH That floored me

      I use that all the time at work.

      'Its not a bug..its a feature...till we have a patch for it' XD

  32. Alternate joke contest by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    tag the article with something sly Mine was "tomcruise" 'cause I couldn't remember his character's name in WotW

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  33. during "scanning"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who the hell would "scan" satellite pictures? this should be digital, morons. hello, it's 2006.

    1. Re:during "scanning"?? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      The satellites weren't put up in 2006.... In fact most of the images weren't generated in 2006... and even so, none of the technology that actually captures the pictures belongs to google.

    2. Re:during "scanning"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direct transfer of image data from a sattelite to computer readable imagery was invented in 2006?

    3. Re:during "scanning"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>and even so, none of the technology that actually captures the pictures belongs to google.

      Well, not yet, anyway. I for one welcome our new overlord and master, "Google"!

    4. Re:during "scanning"?? by idonthack · · Score: 1
      this should be digital, morons.
      scan /skæn/, scanned, scanning, noun -verb (used with object)

      5. to read (data) for use by a computer or computerized device, esp. using an optical scanner.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    5. Re:during "scanning"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ALL* of the high-res imagery you see on Google Maps and Google Earth is done with aerial photography. For an example of how ridiculous low-res satellite imagery is, take a look at North Korea in Google Maps.

      So, it's entirely conceivable that the aerial photography was conducted with ordinary film media and then scanned in.

    6. Re:during "scanning"?? by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of the high-resolution imagery on Google Earth is from aerial photograpy not satellites, and even in 2006 the vast majority of that is still shot on positive-color film. Satellites are sexy and high-tech, but not the most cost-effective way to get very high reolution true-color images.

      Now the fuzzy, false-color "aww, they don't have good pics of this area" imagery *is* from a satellite (Landsat 7, IIRC).

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    7. Re:during "scanning"?? by CagedBear · · Score: 1
      Satellites are sexy...
      Now theres a fetish I haven't heard of.
  34. I DIGG IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this was on digg yesterday. /. is behind the times. prolly too busy doing linux geek stuff
    grep -asdflkjasdlkfj > gnustew.cgi.bin.out

  35. Our beloved leader! by punkin · · Score: 1

    Looks like Kim Jung Il to me.

  36. quick by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

    call gordon freeman, the combine is invading.

  37. Fark had a thread of wierd finds last week by gmezero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink =2294440

    There are some really great shots in that thread as well
    as some co-ordinates to follow up on. One is a wierd land
    area in New Mexico where some scammers had built out all
    the roads for an entire city development and then skipped
    out with the money and never built a thing.

    Very wierd stuff.

    1. Re:Fark had a thread of wierd finds last week by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      You're probably talking about Black Rock City, in the Black Rock Desert. It's built every year for the Burning Man festival and then taken down when it's done.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
  38. figures. by not+a+cylon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well that's what happens when Google tells their employees to spend 20% of their time doing whatever interests them. Giant, mutant, killer insects.

    Damn Ph.D's, with their genome maps and fancy internet tubes.

  39. The Escher Imaging Satellite by craznar · · Score: 1

    That explains it all.

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  40. Re:U.S. Action soon to take place by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wait!!! The UN should threaten sanctions agains the insect first. We must also be sensitive and careful not to hurt the insect's feelings. Or our actions may provoke more insect insurgency. Surely the insect will respond to diplomacy. We should try talking to the insect before we fight. The insect probably doesn't understand that we respect it and mean it no harm.

  41. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not unless you are God and the bug you are stepping on is the Earth.

  42. With apologies to Kafka... by yuriismaster · · Score: 5, Funny
    As Gregor Samsa woke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself in his bed, transformed into a monstrous insect.

    ...and invaded Germany.
    1. Re:With apologies to Kafka... by yourexhalekiss · · Score: 1
      A bug attacked my school once.

      http://69.51.148.7/2004_april15_bugattack!.jpg

  43. Bug in the Matrix by this+great+guy · · Score: 1
    Sidewalk ends

    This is obviously a bug in the Matrix.

  44. Nothing to see here, move along by naoursla · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is just Google's new crawler.

  45. Fifties movie theme by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    At least some one benefited from Chernobyl.

  46. The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you tell us what this is hiding, will they have to kill you?

    1. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Osty · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you tell us what this is hiding, will they have to kill you?

      As far as I can tell, it's hiding nothing. Does that mean I have to die now?

    2. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by josquin00 · · Score: 1

      It's not hiding anything - it seems to have a partial shadow. It must be one of those monoliths from the 2001 series... now, where did I put that thigh bone...

    3. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

      That's just the famous bridge to nowhere.

    4. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by idonthack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Examine the edges and surrounding areas. It looks like it's just a hole where four sections came together.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    5. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by metaltoad · · Score: 1

      That might not be hiding anything, but check out Los Alamos, New Mexico. Notice the resolution is extremely low around there...

    6. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing. I guess we'll never know what we've got here...

      http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&z=15&ll=50.959454, 6.041279&spn=0.024004,0.053644&t=k&om=1

    7. Re:The Yukon/Alaska Black Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  47. Reminds me of an old Frank Zappa song by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheepnis, anyone?

  48. cool by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    While looking for the Fort Worth Water Gardens, I found this.
    Note the lake's color range, not just its unnatural appearance. Now zoom out a couple times.
    They've obviously retouched the lake in the closer images, because you can see evidence of dodging and burning.

    1. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to hit the "link this" in the upper left to grab a URL for what you are viewing, but I think I saw what you are talking about.

  49. Mmmmmm by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Buuuugg poooop....drool

    --
    What?
  50. That's nothing - wait till Vista Arrives!!! by nickull · · Score: 1

    50 meter bug could be squashed with a few good lines of code. Still - I'll never think of anything else when logging into Bugzilla.

    --
    "Question everything, including this!" - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/
  51. If I'm curt with you it's 'cause time is a factor by Mateo_LeFou · · Score: 1

    We don't have time for niceties when shooting for fp or sp or tp.

    --
    My turnips listen for the soft cry of your love
  52. Re:U.S. will bring Mr. E Coli to justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bush said he would bring Mr. E. Coli to justice.
    The terrorists responsible for this giant bug scare will also be caught.
    (That is unless their families are connected to the Bush family, then they will never get caught.)

  53. Germans subpoena Google by solafide · · Score: 0, Redundant
    The German government is threatening subpoenaing Google. The Germans want to know when Google spotted this great bug so that they may wage war on it. 3 battalions of the world-famous German army have been dispatched to the area, but the Germans desire Google to tell them when they caught the bug on camera, so that they know how far it may have fled and thus how much area they must search to find this.

    ;)

    1. Re:Germans subpoena Google by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other news, world renowned military strategist, The Ghost of Sir Basil Liddel-Hart has commented that the bug made a major strategic flaw. "He, and we are assuming this bug to be a 'he' made a serious error." Sir Basil's Ghost, said. "Making his initial landfall target in one of the most millitarily keen nations the world has ever seen was a very poor idea. Because of this mistake the bug has triggered the full mobilisation of the german armed forces and a full scale search and destroy mission has been initiated by the Luftwaffer. My own strategic analysis of the situation leads me to conclude that the bug would have done better to land across the border in France where he would have been almost immediately surrendered to and would have been able to demand any surrender terms he so desired. My advice to the bug now would be to make for France with all haste and use the freshly-surrendered French army to fight the Germans." When queried about how long the French army could be expected to hold out against the most dedicated military machine in the world Sir Basil's Ghost spluttered into his tea and continued: "Oh good gracious me no. The plan wasn't for the French to FIGHT the germans, no-one would expect that and if the French actually tried firing back the Germans would just laugh anyway. No the idea is that the French will immediately surrender again (as is to be expected) and dealing with all the PoW's will hinder the panzer divisions persuing the bug. This should give him the time necessary to hop across the channel and claim asylum in Britain. I hear the benefits are very good".

      In a further development, Russia has started to mobilise its troops onto it's western border in anticipation of a German attack. President Putin said: "Germany has a history of doing this, they did it in the first world war and they also have a history of ripping off old first world war battle plans for use again."

      Asked to step in and resolve the situation by bombing the lot of them back to the stone-age, President George W. Bush said "It is not the policy of the US Government to interfere in the internal issues of sovereign states. We also don't bomb places that don't end in -stan or start with an 'I'" he said, "It's apples and grapefruits really. None of our turtlewax."

      --
      FGD 135
  54. Geometry by plugnpl4y · · Score: 1

    If you consider that it's a 1mm insect that appears to be 50,000mm in Google Earth... how high was the camera that took the photograph?

    1. Re:Geometry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was totally wasted. I mean you should've heard the giggling.

    2. Re:Geometry by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      It was a bug on the SCANNER, not the satellite. Best you can figure out is the DPI of the scanner and the scale of the film, maybe.

  55. You're right! by idonthack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nobody over there actually names things in German. That's just a myth.
    I hear "Kugeltalstraße" is a really popular Chinese street name. Yep, sure looks like China to me.

    --
    Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
  56. tldr by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new giant insectoid overlords. :P

  57. Nice try, Google... by gd23ka · · Score: 3, Funny

    but it's yet only another marketing ploy. Wait till you see Snoopy or Scooby Doo turn up
    on the map, or they start the Google Maps Treasure Hunt next year.

  58. Upping the ante, eh? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is just Google's new crawler.

    Clearly a mere robots.txt is not going to help against this...we're gonna need real robots! Giant ones!!

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  59. Slurm cola! by sankyuu · · Score: 1

    Finally, the secret ingredient... no, the only ingredient of slurm cola! *licks lips*

  60. Your sig. by megaditto · · Score: 1

    Difference between US and the rest of the world

    This goes both ways, of course. 'War on Terror'?

    Here is what they see in China: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14975282/site/newsweek/sit e/newsweek/
    Here is what we see in America: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14964292/site/newsweek /

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
  61. Space? by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1

    These are satellite images, right? So WTF are bugs doing in space?

  62. My wife's pun by Fortran+IV · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's definitely not the lesser of two weevils.

    (My wife is an incorrigible punster. I try not to incorrige her.)

    --
    I figure by 2030 or so my 6-digit UID will be something to brag about.
  63. Looks like... by tubapro12 · · Score: 1

    ...I left Hülen just in time...

  64. Forgive me, but... by alienmole · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new overlord-joke hating overlords!

    1. Re:Forgive me, but... by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      I, for one, welcome our new overlord-joke hating overlords!

      But in Soviet Russia, the overlords joke about YOU!
  65. Huh! by solitas · · Score: 1

    And my submission about weird-looking buildings gets rejected, but bugs they post. Huh, I'm saying! :D

    --
    "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
    1. Re:Huh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK now THAT is funny as hell!

    2. Re:Huh! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I agree -- that one should not have been rejected, it makes Escher look like an amateur!

    3. Re:Huh! by solitas · · Score: 1

      Thanks - scroll-around the map a bit: it's really funny.

      I've noticed the same distortion in other high-rise cities; but not to this extent.

      --
      "It's time to take life by the cans." ~ Bender ("Bendin' in the Wind", ep. 3-13)
  66. Not according to Yahoo (maps beta) by LinDVD · · Score: 1
    --
    Just because you get modded "insightful" on Slashdot doesn't mean you actually are in real life.
  67. That's No Bug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a space station.

    Yeah, I know, it doesn't make sense. Somehow I can still hear Alec Guiness saying that though.

  68. Google Earth too by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Run Google Earth and see it in psuedo-3D! Just punch in the coordinates 48.857699,10.205451

  69. Smoots in a Thrip? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    How many Smoots in a Thrips?

  70. Thats not an insect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks more like a Siemens manager to me.

  71. That insect was born here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... at a huge replica of a landscape the Chinese Army built in the middle of the central Chinese desert. It's a 700 x 900 meter (that means several football fields big) mock-up of Aksai Chin, occupied since the 1962 Sino-Indian War. It's complete with rivers, lakes and snow-capped mountains. You can see a base next to it with hundreds of troop carriers coming and going.

    Nobody has figured out what it's for, though.

    http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showthreaded.php/Cat/0/ Number/484568/

  72. MIB Anyone? by jack_csk · · Score: 1

    Does anyone recall that giant bug in Men In Black I? Perhaps that "giant" thrip was hunting for the galaxy?

  73. Of course he's not alone! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny

    None of us are! There's a giant fucking bug out there!

  74. Re:No... It Came From the German Countryside!!! by CortoMaltese · · Score: 1
  75. Saw that headline, didn't bother to read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assumed it must have been a fossil, since everyone knows that an animal with that large an exoskeleton would be crushed by its own weight.

    So I completely missed the part where it said it was supposedly alive, until I read here that it was a hoax, and got cheated out of falling for it...

  76. Ok, I'm drunk, I just got home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is going on?

  77. Google Sightseeing by Anonymous+Cumshot · · Score: 4, Informative
    Google Sightseeing (the site from which the submitter likely found the giant bug) has lots of similar mishaps chronicled...

    Including boobies!

    --
    Best regards, A.C.
  78. "incremental efficiency" vs "absolute efficiency" by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If the creature containing the cells serves some other purpose other trhan converting food into raw energy then one should not measure efficiency in such absolute terms.

    Say a human being is only 30% efficient in converting food to energy/"work". Given the human already needs a certain amount of food to stay alive, one should also measure the additional amount of food the human needs to do an additional amount of work.

    --
  79. What about the spiders!! by Rungchen · · Score: 1

    Think what they have done with the spiders they have made to control these insects

    --
    You can get it fast, you can get it good, You can get it cheap. Pick two!
    1. Re:What about the spiders!! by g33ky · · Score: 0

      I thought that movie 8-legged-freaks was fiction, now I see its actually a documentary

  80. Re:U.S. Action soon to take place by Thrakamazog · · Score: 1

    I guess we won't know unless we try.

  81. I smell a potboiler or two ... by palemantle · · Score: 1

    Movie buffs and historians will always remember 2007 (with a sigh or a shudder as the case may be) as a seminal year for Hollywood craeture movies. 2007 would see the release of not one but TWO creature movies that - while being no different from the other 1,353,532 that came before them - would feature such incredible concepts as the German countryside and the dreaded thrip. I mean, how much cooler can you get?

  82. Nuke it from orbit.... by felixdzerzhinsky · · Score: 1

    ....its the only way to be sure.

    --
    "Flags are bits of colored cloth that governments use first to shrink-wrap people's brains..."
  83. wrong way by Smoking · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey dude, turn left, Oktoberfest is definitely not this way...

  84. Re:"incremental efficiency" vs "absolute efficienc by nacturation · · Score: 1

    The glucose to energy conversion is used for everything, both in the necessary functions to stay alive as well as doing stuff like kicking ass. Glucose in, energy out... regardless of what that energy is used for.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  85. That's no bug.... by Wizard052 · · Score: 1

    That's just a landmark that's just shaped like a bug. To be precise, it's a depression resulting from a martian meteorite that landed just last week! I can't believe nobody figured this out already...

  86. Re:"incremental efficiency" vs "absolute efficienc by TheLink · · Score: 1

    You miss my point.

    Say X = food required for a particular human to stay alive.
    And Y = additional food required to do Z amount of work.

    Then in many cases one should use Y and Z for calculating efficiency, since you are going to assume that you're going to have to "pay" for X anyway.

    I doubt that the Y-Z ratio would remain constant to the max Z of a human.

    So it could be more interesting to know the incremental efficiency.

    --
  87. Bugzilla Bug #3278 by gpn · · Score: 1

    There is a bug in Google maps.

  88. Satellites have scanners? by BlueMonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone enlighten me. I was under the impression that these images were coming directly from Satellite images. Maybe I was misled by the fact that the button on the map that says what mode it is in says "Satellite". Am I to believe that there are people physically getting these images on paper, putting them in a scanner and scanning each square of Google's whole database of images from earth's surface!? Of course if there were actual people involved, you'd think they would have noticed this, but even an automated process seems ridiculous to me... why would these images ever be in physical form?

    1. Re:Satellites have scanners? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      Someone enlighten me. I was under the impression that these images were coming directly from Satellite images. Maybe I was misled by the fact that the button on the map that says what mode it is in says "Satellite".

      You are correct - Google has misled you by implying that all the photographs came from satellite imagery, when in fact much of it came from aerial photography.
       
       
      Am I to believe that there are people physically getting these images on paper, putting them in a scanner and scanning each square of Google's whole database of images from earth's surface!?

      Google buys its input from a wide variety of companies - most of whom do the digitization themselves and then sell the digital files to Google. I suspect the companies do the digitizing themselves for their own purposes and later resell the data to Google. So, yes - there are a bunch of people taking a stack of paper and scanning it, but it's a distributed project across a bunch of companies across a bunch of years. (Google recently added 'new' [to Google] high res imagery of my area - imagery that's actually nearly five years old.)
       
       
      why would these images ever be in physical form?

      Because not everything is done direct to digital. High resolution large format negative are (for this purpose) still better than their digital equivalents.
  89. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The French army surrenders, just in case the bug chooses to crawl westward.

  90. How do I. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how do I report a bug in google maps? *groan*

  91. Re:U.S. Action soon to take place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the fuck did that get moderated "4, insightful"? The grandparent post was at least funny.

  92. Scan? by gdesignrr · · Score: 1

    Seriously... can someone explain why they are scanning a photo? I thought these were digital images from a satellite?

  93. Re:U.S. Action soon to take place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because some people don't see any difference between a giant bug and certain nations' various _human_ enemies? And they think that's a great insight.

  94. And you guys said I was crazy by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Bet you all wish you'd invested in the Earth Escape Pod(TM) now, don't you?

    So long, suckers!!

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  95. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  96. Why Scan? by tmjva · · Score: 1

    This bugs the question: It wasn't in digital format to begin with?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  97. Try this link by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Here's a link that should work for you.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  98. It's by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    It's the "other" white meat.

    What's for dinner?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  99. No, they just keep coming back to Tokyo by StressGuy · · Score: 1


    They'll sack Tokyo, then half an hour later they're hungry again...Now, if they attacked Thailand or Mexico, a half hour later they'd be wishing they just attacked Japan.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  100. It ain't a thrip... by uber-pedant · · Score: 1

    it's a thrips.

    Ends with an 's' even in the singular. Apparently.

    That's a good pub game... how many singular English words can you come up with that end in 's'?

  101. Re:"incremental efficiency" vs "absolute efficienc by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Actually, I did understand your point but I thought the parent to your post was just talking about raw conversion of energy in cells. I followed the thread all the way back up and saw that it's talking about insects converting energy to kinetic energy. In which case, you're correct -- you'd have to factor in the base energy requirements of the organism as a whole.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  102. Mod parent up! by thepod · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!