I also do not listen to a lot of music. In fact hold on... let me check my XM... hmm... 140... I guess I'm listening to ESPN Radio. But that is music to my ears.
Exactly ! I can't tell you how many times I've made a (internal) site that I get a call on asking me how to do something. (Example uploading a reciept for an expense)
Me:... Can you read me what you are looking at?
Users: Sure, Up top is says Report for 2/1/2007 under that it has my expenses listed out, under that... oh... um... do I click on "add new receipts" ?
Oops, I guess I should have read this before I posted mine.
Well I guess I was redundant.
But either way... This is the first time I'm ok with being redundant. In case you want to see what I'd look like doing two chicks at the same time (NSFW)
For if you were an atheist then you'd be tolerate of religions. Because you wouldn't care what they think. And there is no better tolerance then not giving a fuck.
I'm not so sure you didn't leave out 28 - 31 because it said:
28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless
Which even in context makes: envy, deceit and malice, gossips, slanderers, insolent, arrogant, boastful, they invent ways of doing evil, they disobey their parents, senseless, and being ruthless all 'grave' sins (death).
Personally I like 26... Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. Sounds yummy !
I'm in Michigan around the Flint area. But I work a good distance away from there. I started with Cingular but the coverage dropped out too much on my hour long trip to work. So I switched to Nextel. Ooops. Now I'm on Verizon, I've had no problems (I have the LG 9800.) There were some billing issues when the switched their auto-pay that took 3 months to work out but customer service kept working with me until it was fixed. I would like them to have more GSM phones however.
One would think that Clippy is stupid (I'd be in that group); however, during my time at NMU the administration was implementing a mandatory laptop program. The administration at some point was debating if they should just get rid of the Mac labs (I think it was in '97). Somehow word got back to the Apple themselves. They send some sales reps out to tell us why we should keep Apple Computers around. One of their reasons... we have Clippy !
If it's not innovative to get Apple Computer to use Clippy as a reason to keep the Mac labs at NMU... I just don't get innovation.;)
Yes, you are correct I should have worded that better. The perception is that Kerry wouldn't do what was in the USA's best interest.
Consulting others is always for the best. Getting perspective away from your isolated ideas is necessary. However the perception is that Kerry would put the other Countries' interest above his own Country (the USA).
But again that's only perceptions. As we know that's are not always fact.
I'm just going to skip to your last question. And take from this what you will. The reason Bush got re-elected the other side (Kerry) was unelectable. I believe that most of the votes that Kerry got were not votes for Kerry but votes against Bush.
So how could a guy be less electable then Bush? Done mostly by perception with where (note I'm not saying these are facts I'm saying these are perceptions):
Kerry is the second most Liberal person in the Senate.
Kerry couldn't stay on topic with out changing his mind atleast once.
Kerry's wife was crazy / out of control.
Kerry thought he was entitled to the presidency.
Kerry was the anti-war hero. (Came back and only seemed to bad mouth troops. A good chunk of the 'vets would blame people like Kerry for keeping them over there longer.)
Kerry would consult the world on US affairs. (Which I think was the real damnation of this campaign. I don't know anyone really who is willing to let the world tell you what is in YOUR Country's best interest.)
So how did Kerry lose? Bush still seemed like the candidate who would do what was in the best interest of the USA. He also didn't get an strong anti-Kerry vote. Both Bush and Kerry sucked as options. That is why Bush is the one still sitting in the office. IMHO.
So the question that should be asked of the world. Would you elect a person to lead your Country that has the perception of putting another Countries' interest ahead of your own?
I know I'm going to get the 'troll' for this, so enjoy that. But this really has to be said (again)
I remember those days. Those were awesome ! The DOJ spending millions of dollars on no ROI. Forcing M$ to start a well funded lobby.
We all had money coming out our asses so we didn't care. Heck we were so bored we went after the President because he got a bj from an ugly girl. I would have really liked to keep going after M$. I'm sure that would be a better use of the DOJ today.
Slashdot Mirror
I also do not listen to a lot of music. In fact hold on... let me check my XM... hmm... 140... I guess I'm listening to ESPN Radio. But that is music to my ears.
I'm actually writing this from jail :(
Exactly ! I can't tell you how many times I've made a (internal) site that I get a call on asking me how to do something. (Example uploading a reciept for an expense)
... Can you read me what you are looking at?
... oh... um... do I click on "add new receipts" ?
Me:
Users: Sure, Up top is says Report for 2/1/2007 under that it has my expenses listed out, under that
Me: Yes.
Now, to get get some coffee while I this posts.
Umm... NPR is on both, on XM it's 133
Oops, I guess I should have read this before I posted mine.
Well I guess I was redundant.
But either way... This is the first time I'm ok with being redundant. In case you want to see what I'd look like doing two chicks at the same time (NSFW)
I'll tell you what I'd do, man: two chicks at the same time, man.
Umm... the iPod was not first to mkt, nor will be this "iPhone." So they don't really open new mkts. They just market better then their competition.
But then again it's easy to sell Jesus to a Christian then it is to sell him to an Atheist. (read iPod fanboys will buy anything in their niche.)
"It secretly amuses me when Americans (one of only three backwards countries that haven't converted) argue about keeping the "imperial" system."
That's funny last time I looked your money is defined relative to the USD. So you going to switch?
I had also been fired for being in the online sex chat rooms. Though I think my case maybe a little different... my pants were down when I got caught.
--
Alanna: Saying that Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders
I know teacher... the answer is you !
For if you were an atheist then you'd be tolerate of religions. Because you wouldn't care what they think. And there is no better tolerance then not giving a fuck.
I'm not so sure you didn't leave out 28 - 31 because it said:
28 Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done.
29 They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips,
30 slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents;
31 they are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless
Which even in context makes: envy, deceit and malice, gossips, slanderers, insolent, arrogant, boastful, they invent ways of doing evil, they disobey their parents, senseless, and being ruthless all 'grave' sins (death).
Personally I like 26... Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones. Sounds yummy !
and I have to wonder, what is gay marriage without gay sex?
What? You never herd of a sexless marriage?
But really... that Jesus dude changed the rules ... again.
I'm in Michigan around the Flint area. But I work a good distance away from there. I started with Cingular but the coverage dropped out too much on my hour long trip to work. So I switched to Nextel. Ooops. Now I'm on Verizon, I've had no problems (I have the LG 9800.) There were some billing issues when the switched their auto-pay that took 3 months to work out but customer service kept working with me until it was fixed. I would like them to have more GSM phones however.
Step 1: Do something (knowingly) stupid.
Step 2: sue
Step 3: um...
Step 4: Profit !
Is this still true?
Maybe.. but what do the girls do? Do they grab the guy next to them or just point at his?
Hmmm...
I don't think they could do that. It's not like YouTube has the bandwidth that say a google has... oh... never mind.
Yahoo is so bad for pushing IE7... blah blah blah...
Hey now let us not forget this or the /. related link of this.
Myabe Yahoo could also pay people $1 for switching to IE7
Let us not forget this unfriendly script
Clippy - bwahahahahahahaha x 200
One would think that Clippy is stupid (I'd be in that group); however, during my time at NMU the administration was implementing a mandatory laptop program. The administration at some point was debating if they should just get rid of the Mac labs (I think it was in '97). Somehow word got back to the Apple themselves. They send some sales reps out to tell us why we should keep Apple Computers around. One of their reasons... we have Clippy !
If it's not innovative to get Apple Computer to use Clippy as a reason to keep the Mac labs at NMU... I just don't get innovation. ;)
--
My Dad's Sig can beat up your Dad's sig.
Yes, you are correct I should have worded that better. The perception is that Kerry wouldn't do what was in the USA's best interest.
Consulting others is always for the best. Getting perspective away from your isolated ideas is necessary. However the perception is that Kerry would put the other Countries' interest above his own Country (the USA).
But again that's only perceptions. As we know that's are not always fact.
I'm just going to skip to your last question. And take from this what you will. The reason Bush got re-elected the other side (Kerry) was unelectable. I believe that most of the votes that Kerry got were not votes for Kerry but votes against Bush.
So how could a guy be less electable then Bush? Done mostly by perception with where (note I'm not saying these are facts I'm saying these are perceptions):
So how did Kerry lose? Bush still seemed like the candidate who would do what was in the best interest of the USA. He also didn't get an strong anti-Kerry vote. Both Bush and Kerry sucked as options. That is why Bush is the one still sitting in the office. IMHO.
So the question that should be asked of the world. Would you elect a person to lead your Country that has the perception of putting another Countries' interest ahead of your own?
Don't forget about Sweatshops. -- Sig on this.
The most honest thing I've seen on here today is this answer.
Thanks for typing this for me. I get a cramp if I have to type too much.
I know I'm going to get the 'troll' for this, so enjoy that. But this really has to be said (again)
I remember those days. Those were awesome ! The DOJ spending millions of dollars on no ROI. Forcing M$ to start a well funded lobby.
We all had money coming out our asses so we didn't care. Heck we were so bored we went after the President because he got a bj from an ugly girl. I would have really liked to keep going after M$. I'm sure that would be a better use of the DOJ today.
Wait...
"And the point you're trying to make here is what, exactly? That Japan and the US have control over the UN because they "pay" for it? Right"
Heck no!
My point is a 40% drop in funding is going to either severely hamper the UN from being able to handle it's duties or completely dismantle it.
My hunch is that you skipped this line from me: "I think the Internet should be regulated by an entity that really could be disbanded at anytime."
The 40% line was there to support the fact of how easy it would be for the UN to fall apart.