Slashdot Mirror


Best Sitting Posture Is Not Straight Up

An anonymous reader writes, "Researchers at Woodend Hospital in Aberdeen, Scotland used a new form of magnetic resonance imaging to collect images from 22 healthy volunteers, who assumed three different sitting positions: slouching posture in which the body is hunched forward, an upright 90-degree sitting position, and a relaxed position where the subject reclined backward 135 degrees. They concluded that the reclined position is the best, and the forward slouch the worst." From the article: "'We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires the vast majority of the global population to work in a seated position,' Dr. Bashir said. 'This made our search for the optimal sitting position all the more important.'"

291 comments

  1. Is it just me... by Akvum · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or did you start to slouch the moment you read this?

    1. Re:Is it just me... by RsG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Start?

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was already slouching.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Or did you start to slouch the moment you read this?
      Unfortunately, the problem with the 135 degrees position is that you need a very good chair with a head-rest, otherwise, sitting at 135 degrees while keeping you head straight (in order to be looking horizontally at your monitor, rather than at the ceiling) hurts the neck.
      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    4. Re:Is it just me... by sparkane · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually it really made me sit up and take notice.

      sig: "I'll slouch when I'm dead!"

    5. Re:Is it just me... by Volante3192 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Throwing too many researchers at a problem is like throwing too many programmers at an operating system. Plus not every researcher has a cellular biological background (or whatever...)

      This is actually one of the better pseudo-scientific studies at least, can finally get some closure on all those times I was told 'SIT UP STRAIGHT!'

    6. Re:Is it just me... by udderly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. I'm moved my mouse and keyboard to try out the whole 135 degree thing. I have to admit that it does seem very comfortable for my back and hamstrings, my chair doesn't have a headrest and my neck is starting to fatigue. I wonder about moving the monitor closer to me, higher up and tilting the top of it downward some. Of couse I would need some sort of fancy mount to do that.

    7. Re:Is it just me... by danpsmith · · Score: 3, Funny
      Or did you start to slouch the moment you read this?

      Oh come on, I was already leaning back, don't you remember? Fat Joe told us to do this a couple years ago.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    8. Re:Is it just me... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Old phone books would prop up a monitor quite nicely.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    9. Re:Is it just me... by greenbird · · Score: 5, Funny
      Or did you start to slouch the moment you read this?
      Unfortunately, the problem with the 135 degrees position is that you need a very good chair with a head-rest, otherwise, sitting at 135 degrees while keeping you head straight (in order to be looking horizontally at your monitor, rather than at the ceiling) hurts the neck.

      I'm typing this reclined in a lazyboy with a 22" wide screen monitor, mounted with an arm to the desk next to the chair, hovering about 18" away from eyes at a perfect viewing angle using a wireless keyboard and trackball connected to an 8 way KVM with 5 computers lined up within reach under the desk next to the chair. Add in the sound system, 42" HD LCD TV visible just to the right of the monitor and it makes for a work environment I don't mind spending 14 hours a day in. Oh... I also have an exercise bike that the arm mounted monitor can reach and I rigged with mounts for the keyboard and trackball. The only thing I haven't figured out is the whole bathroom thing.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    10. Re:Is it just me... by Chris_Mir · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Whoa. yes, I indeed did. Until I saw your post and rofl'd

    11. Re:Is it just me... by creepynut · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm typing this reclined in a lazyboy with a 22" wide screen monitor, mounted with an arm to the desk next to the chair, hovering about 18" away from eyes at a perfect viewing angle using a wireless keyboard and trackball connected to an 8 way KVM with 5 computers lined up within reach under the desk next to the chair. Add in the sound system, 42" HD LCD TV visible just to the right of the monitor


      You sir may just be the biggest, dorkiest, geek ever born. I salute you :P
    12. Re:Is it just me... by cytg.net · · Score: 1

      dont know with you guys, but i've known this for the past 20 years ..

    13. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I sat back into that 135 degree position, just before I read that's the best position.

    14. Re:Is it just me... by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      Nope I was at work already reclining in a slouch when I read it. I always slouch... No wonder I don't have back problems.

    15. Re:Is it just me... by Shortgeek · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the problem with the 135 degrees position is that you need a very good chair with a head-rest, otherwise, sitting at 135 degrees while keeping you head straight (in order to be looking horizontally at your monitor, rather than at the ceiling) hurts the neck.
      I'm typing this in a normal chair, leaning back, back two legs on the ground. My head is resting on the back of my bed, on the headrest. Very comfortable, and I moved the keyboard onto my lap. Maybe it's "a very good chair with a headrest", but everything is fairly standard equipment in a common home. (Then again, some of us aren't at home...)

      --
      Note to self: Make a funny sig.
    16. Re:Is it just me... by Fordiman · · Score: 1

      Hm. Been doing that for five years now, alternating with 90, hunched forward and squinting (I lose my glasses a lot).

      --
      110100 1101000 1101000 1100110 0 1101111 1101000 1100011 1
    17. Re:Is it just me... by Necrobruiser · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      re: Your Sig.

      Erotic is when you use a french tickler. Exotic is when you use french toast.

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    18. Re:Is it just me... by damonlab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Spoken like an admin.

    19. Re:Is it just me... by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny
      The only thing I haven't figured out is the whole bathroom thing.

      Solution: Eric Cartman's Mom.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    20. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the most constipated. Hope he figures out the bathroom thing soon!

    21. Re:Is it just me... by tobiasly · · Score: 2, Funny

      HA! You were WRONG all those years, Mom! Sitting up straight isn't better... IN YOUR FACE!! BOOOYAAAAA...

    22. Re:Is it just me... by nuttycom · · Score: 1

      No doubt. I've got an upside-down trash can pushed way back under my desk as a footrest, and my chair reclined as far as it will go. Having a relaxed posture and a relaxed attitude is essential to writing good code.

      I mean, who can think straight if they're all tensed to sit upright?

    23. Re:Is it just me... by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Unfortunately, the problem with the 135 degrees position is that you need a very good chair with a head-rest, otherwise, sitting at 135 degrees while keeping you head straight (in order to be looking horizontally at your monitor, rather than at the ceiling) hurts the neck.
      Maybe office chair manufacturers should take some design hints from car seat manufacturers. I once sat behind the wheel of a low-to-the-ground Ferrai Testarossa, and almost felt like I was lying on my back. However, the headrest's design somehow keeps the driver's head in a comfortable position to see the road.

      The first thought that came to my mind, when I saw this story's headline, was that this is important news for truckers, people with long commutes, and others who drive long distances. Office workers can at least find a moment to stand up and stretch once in a while. Drivers can put themselves in danger by just squirming in their seat.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    24. Re:Is it just me... by Eideewt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what kind of a moron would waste their time on something *every person on the planet* has to deal with?

    25. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      S?

    26. Re:Is it just me... by nytes · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree.

      I'm now reclining back at 135 degrees, with my monitor sitting atop a 4-foot high stack of phone books, right in front of me. Of course, it took some doing to get the monitor angled down so I'm facing it straight on. As long as the duct tape holds, everything is gre
      NO CARRIER

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    27. Re:Is it just me... by bigred85 · · Score: 1

      That and why you'll never be with a girl in your life. ;)

      Oh I'm sure he's gotten that one figured out already.

      I believe the saying goes something like "Sex can wait, masturbate".

    28. Re:Is it just me... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Hello, didn't you get that memo? We can't work on any other projects until cancer is cured!

      Now get off slashdot and stop wasting your life and start turning on Folding @ Home; it's the only distributed computing project worth participating in! If you don't do those things, YOU WILL DIE OF CANCER! AHAHAHAAHAHAH!

      </sarcasm>

      --
      My other car is first.
    29. Re:Is it just me... by sco08y · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only thing I haven't figured out is the whole bathroom thing.

      I'm sure a good plumber could work it for you. You'll probably have to forgo pants.

    30. Re:Is it just me... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Just a minute now...Dr. Bashir! Wasn't he a time-traveler from a Star Trek series - hmmm...the one on that space station....is this about slackers???

    31. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Yep, too right. A few months ago, I put my back out when a stair gave way under me. I literally couldn't stand up straight or walk unsupported for several days. Sleeping was also difficult, because I couldn't lie on my back, either side or front comfortably for more than a few minutes. Bizarrely, the one place that was perfectly comfortable was the sport-style bucket seat in the front of my Subaru Impreza. I could probably have driven completely normally (though I didn't risk it!) as I had no trouble moving any limbs once my back was supported by that seat.

      Incidentally, while I certainly don't drive at the 135 degree angle mentioned, I do find it much more comfortable to drive with the seat somewhat reclined than completely upright. I also sit back at probably somewhere around the 105-120 degree range at work. I now have a chair that tilts and supports me in this position, but even on a cheapo office chair, I'm more comfortable sitting back like that (with basically no support under my lower back) than I am sitting bolt upright, even for quite extended periods. According to the current theories (give or take this article) I should probably have terrible back problems all the time as a result, but it just doesn't seem to happen (touch wood!).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    32. Re:Is it just me... by sodul · · Score: 1

      I'm actually replying from my bed.

      While I do have a desk with a leather chair, I find it very uncomfortable especially since I tend to lean forward. As my primary machine is a laptop, I can actually use the machine by putting it on my laps and belly, with my back and neck resting on a stack of pillows. After a long day at the office it's extremely comfortable.

      While I miss my split keyboard, the keyboard on the MacBook Pro is good enough for most tasks, so is the screen resolution.

      I remember a thread a while back here on slashdot where the idea of using the bed for anything else but sleeping (or more with the wife) was wrong. But I guess I know have Scottish researchers to 'back me up' instead of just my pillows.

    33. Re:Is it just me... by shayne321 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only thing I haven't figured out is the whole bathroom thing.

      Hmm, yeah, problem solved

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    34. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    35. Re:Is it just me... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but how many EQ accounts are you boxing?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    36. Re:Is it just me... by Johan+Jonasson · · Score: 1

      You'll probably have to forgo pants.

      Doesn't sound all that bad.

    37. Re:Is it just me... by mr_matticus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hello, ass flap pants, how good to meet you.

    38. Re:Is it just me... by famebait · · Score: 1

      I remember a thread a while back here on slashdot where the idea of using the bed for anything else but sleeping (or more with the wife) was wrong. But I guess I know have Scottish researchers to 'back me up' instead of just my pillows. Get two beds, and everything will be perfect.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    39. Re:Is it just me... by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.

    40. Re:Is it just me... by XLR8DST8 · · Score: 1

      catheters my friend. anyone who takes the 5 freeway to work knows, it's all about catheters..

    41. Re:Is it just me... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Why did his monitor breaking kill the rest of his PC?

      I sense bullshit.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    42. Re:Is it just me... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Yeah just what we need. Let's make the overworked, no sleep in days, truck driver's seats more comfortable.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    43. Re:Is it just me... by Grax · · Score: 1

      He is a movie character. It is well documented that movie computers lose all their information when their monitors are destroyed.

  2. Vast majority? by benhocking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does the vast majority of the global population really work in a sitting position, or is it just the vast majority that are participating in the "global economy"? I.e., if you factor in the billions who are living in poverty, is that statement still true? I'm skeptical.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Vast majority? by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      Does the vast majority of the global population really work in a sitting position, or is it just the vast majority that are participating in the "global economy"? I.e., if you factor in the billions who are living in poverty, is that statement still true? I'm skeptical.

      Well don't even consider the unemployed. How about the hundreds of millions of factory workers in countries as prosperous as the United States (and company). Or the farmers and ranchers. I don't have specifics but I'd bet there are 10x as many jobs not sitting at a desk as there are that this study effects.

      However! All humans sit. And most humans sit on a chair or bench where this study does provide useful information. The vast majority of us drive cars and sit in front of a TV for a few hours per week. And we all sit to eat.

      So when you're sitting sit in a comfortable relaxing posture and make the most of the time on your butt.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    2. Re:Vast majority? by zCyl · · Score: 1
      Does the vast majority of the global population really work in a sitting position, or is it just the vast majority that are participating in the "global economy"?

      The vast majority of people who can read news articles at work do. I.e., the audience.
    3. Re:Vast majority? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well don't even consider the unemployed.

      They would spend their days either sitting on a couch or a bar stool. They would slouch backward on a couch, which is good, or slouch forward on a bar stool, which is bad.

      I don't have specifics but I'd bet there are 10x as many jobs not sitting at a desk as there are that this study effects.

      75% of the first-world economy is in the service sector. This tends to mean desk jobs. Farmers would probably spend a good deal of time sitting while driving equipment or filing for government hand-outs. Many factory workers would be seated, too, on stools to assemble small items. I would guess that less than 10% of jobs require a significant amount of standing/moving.

    4. Re:Vast majority? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      75% of the first-world economy is in the service sector. This tends to mean desk jobs.

      Riiight. Go to any restaurant or store and tell me how many of the waiters or salespeople you see sitting. Is this kind of work an insignificant part of the service sector?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Vast majority? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      Go to any restaurant

      I find it ironic you say that. I wonder what the customers are doing? Floating?

    6. Re:Vast majority? by whimmel · · Score: 1
      75% of the first-world economy is in the service sector. This tends to mean desk jobs.


      service sector desk jobs? You mean like housekeeping, food service, custodial... To me "desk jobs" means professionals.
      --
      Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
    7. Re:Vast majority? by LifeWithJustin · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Vast majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they may or may not be working. The point was that waiters and such are jobs in the service industry which do not involve being seated for long periods of time.

    9. Re:Vast majority? by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny
      However! All humans sit.
      I have no buttocks, you insensitive clod!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Vast majority? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Many factory workers would be seated, too, on stools to assemble small items. I would guess that less than 10% of jobs require a significant amount of standing/moving.

      You've never held a factory job have you....

      You stand, they reprimand you for sitting in a factory.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Vast majority? by umbrellasd · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say that a vast majority of us take things lying down, and no small number of us work that way, too! And on that note, I am happily reminded that, study or no, I do have one component that definitely works best straight up--lying down or not.

    12. Re:Vast majority? by bchernicoff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Farmers would probably spend a good deal of time sitting while driving equipment or filing for government hand-outs.

      A+ for slipping in this criticism of the farm subsidy system.

    13. Re:Vast majority? by drsquare · · Score: 1
      75% of the first-world economy is in the service sector. This tends to mean desk jobs.

      Cooks, waiters, shelf-stackers, cleaners, most the service industry jobs are not sat down.

      Many factory workers would be seated, too, on stools to assemble small items.

      No, most factory work is stood up.
    14. Re:Vast majority? by BigLug · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the 'hospitality sector'? The service sector is business-services.

    15. Re:Vast majority? by neoform · · Score: 1

      We should all do like Donald Rumsfeld and work standing up, then we can all be such hard workers just like him!

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    16. Re:Vast majority? by Matthias777 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Could you get me a job at one of these factories where they buy everyone chairs? I, a number of my family members, and multiple friends/acquaintances all hold or have held jobs in the industrial sector, and it is very rare for anyone on the production floor to have the luxury of sitting down. If you work in a factory or plant of some kind and sit down for a significant portion of the day, it's because you're in management.

    17. Re:Vast majority? by FLJerseyBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wonder if we could take this question even further -- discarding the notion of "work" -- to ask, simply, what the best sitting posture is, period. (Assuming it's a given that "best"="healthiest" or some reasonable facsimile thereof.) The problem with the "work" concept is that there are so many forms of seated work: tasks involving reaching, vs. those simply requiring laying one's fingertips on a keyboard; tasks in which the relationship of the seat to the work surface is user-adjustable, vs. those in which it is not; and (as you hint at) work in the first-world economy vs. those in the third.

    18. Re:Vast majority? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      I had a factory job soldering components on circuit boards for laser sights that fit in the receiver of pistols (damn cool, the dot came on when you turned off the safety but you'd never know it had a laser sight just by looking at it), and we had to sit down.

      I get your point though, I'm just being an ass.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    19. Re:Vast majority? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1
      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    20. Re:Vast majority? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Not to mention sweatshop workers, seated on benches for 16 hours a day.

    21. Re:Vast majority? by Bobbolytic · · Score: 1

      How about driving?

      Anyone ever notice the number of people who cruise around with their seatback cranked straight up, seat slid to the front of the rails, elbows acutely bent, hands grasping the wheel at "10 and 2" with the airbag goading the clueless driver to just bump into something at more than 10 MPH, ready to smash their face into the headrest?

      When I drive, I pretty much recline just like the study mentions, just far enough so my neck doean't have to work too hard to keep my head up--no, I don't drive around resting my head on the headrest... Everything is within arm's (or leg's) reach. And my airbag is at a safe distance from my CPU. I can drive for hours with little fatigue.

      --
      "Man is pre-eminently endowed with the power of voluntarily and consciously determining his own point of view." E. Mach
    22. Re:Vast majority? by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      I find it ironic you say that. I wonder what the customers are doing? Floating?

      Not working?

    23. Re:Vast majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stools for factory workers? Come on! Cheap human robots do not require stools, comfort, or even a decent salary. Haven't you ever been a CEO?

    24. Re:Vast majority? by WeblionX · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what you get for LMAOing so much.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    25. Re:Vast majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the vast majority of workers in the world most certainly do NOT work sitting down. This is just another example of the lack of knowledge of the so-called "knowledge worker."

      The majority of workers are either farmers or homemakers (stay at home spouses/parents).

      That probably accounts for over 3/4 or the workers in the world, right there.

    26. Re:Vast majority? by wellingj · · Score: 1

      More like a D- in my book. Why take pot shots at the hand that feeds you? The alternative is we pay more for food and spend the surpluss money on... what would you propose?

    27. Re:Vast majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the alternative is that you pay less in tax, don't pay much more for food from other sources, encourage free trade, and provide a way out of poverty (through trade) for struggling nations. Overall your country, indeed the world, would be better off if you withdrew the subsidies.

      I suggest you do some reading on basic economics, and why and how subsidies grossly distort markets. Why exactly should rich groups get paid simply to own farmland, and not even produce anything?

      Do you get paid to do nothing at your job? Why doesn't someone subsidise me to not work, but keep a suit at home?

      I'm not an economist, I only have a basic grasp of it, but it is quite plain to me, as someone from a country that does not subsidise farming, just how unfair the whole system is, and that consumers do not benefit from it.

    28. Re:Vast majority? by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      When agriculture is your largest industry (even in the information age), and when the resources can be consumed faster than they can regenerate, you're damn right I think someone had better step in.

      The alternative? Collapse of agricultural industry due to overfarming, collapse of prices due to temporary oversupply, abject poverty and widespread hunger in the United States. We can farm the hell out of corn for 5 years, but what's going to convince people that they're growing too damn much corn, depleting the soil and contributing to their own poor prices when it's time to sell?

      Really cheap food is great for a few years, but what happens when you've got a decade of NO FOOD after that and prices skyrocket several times above what they were when t=0? People had spent the intervening years with declining prices adjusting their budgets downward and suddenly can't afford the overpriced food that we're forced to import. Farm subsidies aren't bad, and it's not always bad to grow nothing. A free market doesn't solve anything when it comes to food (or countless other things, really, but that's a story for another time).

      If you're consuming resources too rapidly, there are only two ways you can be convinced to stop: running out of resources, or being given adequate incentives not to. Same with lumber, though they're controlled by statute and tax. Blah blah tragedy of the commons blah, etc.

    29. Re:Vast majority? by name*censored* · · Score: 1
      And my airbag is at a safe distance from my CPU.
      Yeah so is mine, but thats because there's usually a case/mobo in between them?

      (I do know what you mean I was just being an ass :P) I drive like that though, but that's only because im 6"2' and every single car I've driven isn't big enough for me to run the seat back far enough, but then again I've never driven in a 4WD, let alone an American SUV (dang those cars are big). I do recline it to 135* though (as long as theres noone in the backseat)
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    30. Re:Vast majority? by somersault · · Score: 0, Redundant

      All humans sit. And most humans sit on a chair or bench where this study does provide useful information. The vast majority of us drive cars and sit in front of a TV for a few hours per week. And we all sit to eat.

      So when you're sitting sit in a comfortable relaxing posture and make the most of the time on your butt.
      I have no butt, you insensetive clod!!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    31. Re:Vast majority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever driven any American car? I'm 6'7", but have a two door Oldsmobile (regular car) and I fit in it fine. Same thing when my father used to own a Corvette. It seems like there are some car models designed for taller people (unfortunately, not so much the very fuel efficient ones). I'd like to own an SUV or truck that would be easier for me to get in to (I fit in the car, but I still have to step down to get in), but I'm also a bit of a hippy and therefore want to have a reasonably fuel efficient vehicule.

    32. Re:Vast majority? by hirebrand · · Score: 1

      Retail is a service sector, employs massive numbers of workers, and rarely involves sitting down.

    33. Re:Vast majority? by somersault · · Score: 1

      damnit - redundant? That's what I get for opening 10 /. tabs at once and taking ages to reply :( *sigh*

      --
      which is totally what she said
  3. yep by corychristison · · Score: 2, Informative

    *kicks back*

    I have to say that this chair was the best investment I ever made... only about $100 (Canadian) at Walmart, but still. :-)

    1. Re:yep by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2, Funny
      *kicks back*

      I have to say that this chair was the best investment I ever made... only about $100 (Canadian) at Walmart, but still. :-)


      Now, replace your chair with mine. The one I was issued at work.

      I have to say that this chair was the best investment they ever made... only about $250 (US) at WWHHAAAAAAA!!!

      ....while the recline limit pin gives way. It's a spring loaded pin you pull out to set. The slightest forward motion SILENTLY returns the pin to the unlocked position. The next time I lean back, everybody in the office knows it.

    2. Re:yep by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My chair at work is almost as bad. Worse, probably, in some ways; the pin sort of works its way out as I move around, so it's random when it will fall. And the chair skews to the right when I lean back.

      Personally I've always had a low-rider seating/typing style. It's not quite typing-correct (the hand part I mean) but since my hands are so huge it causes me literal pain to place my fingers on the home row, so I can't touch-type by the book anyway. In spite of that I get about 75WPM at 99% accuracy on a good keyboard like a clicky IBM one (or 95% on this laptop.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  4. Well this is good news by kmhebert · · Score: 1

    Now I need to get my boss to buy me a recliner. My office chair sucks, I do find myself reclining it it while I can but it almost seems to force me to lean over.

    --
    Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    1. Re:Well this is good news by maclizard · · Score: 1

      well, i don't know where my office chair came from but it relines right to 135 degrees... its awsome.

  5. not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This doesn't come as much of a surprise to me. In order to get an idea of some fairly natural postures for humans, one need only visit the primate house at the local zoo. Of course, if you don't believe in evolution, then maybe you should observe positions at your local church (pews are good for you!). Just don't complain to me about back pain later in life.

    1. Re:not surprising by Jake73 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what zoo you frequent, but I haven't seen many primates assume the relaxing 135-degree lean-back posture.

      Perhaps you'd have better luck arguing that we (as humans) evolved a sophisticated intelligence for the sole purpose of developing the recliner to improve our posture.

  6. Best for the back... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But not necessarily for the task.

    In other words, can you please do a study confirming (to my employer, of course) that this 135 degree reclined position does not adversely affect my the bloodflow to the brain, attention span, ability to perform complex mental tasks, etc?

    From my anecdotal experience with video games, I can definitely say that my performance is much better when I am leaning forward than when I am reclining -- though this may also have something to do with distance from the monitor, etc.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    1. Re:Best for the back... by gt_mattex · · Score: 4, Funny

      From my anecdotal experience with video games, I can definitely say that my performance is much better when I am leaning forward than when I am reclining -- though this may also have something to do with distance from the monitor, etc.

      I believe this would have something to do with leaning forward being a more 'aggressive' stance.

      --
      "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    2. Re:Best for the back... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      The problem is also that if your environment at work is not set up to accommodate your leaning back position (ie monitors way up high, etc) then your neck ends up bending forward and holding up the weight of your head so you can see your screens and anything else on the desk.

      It will end up giving you neck pain. Sitting fairly straight seems to be the best for taking burden off your neck. When you're standing, your neck doesn't often get tired.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    3. Re:Best for the back... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Makes a lot of sense. Better adrenergic response when leaning forward, as the adrenergic response is not needed near so much when 'safely' reclined... from a two-bit evolutionary analysis.

      Great sig, btw.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Best for the back... by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Music students are taught to sit upright, not touching the chair back, which requires scooting one's rear several inches forward, generally the highest part of the seat surface. Talk about unstable.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    5. Re:Best for the back... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      The main reason you perform better when leaning forward is that the television or monitor fills more of your field of vision, allowing your brain to ignore the surrounding environment and pay more attention to the game. This is the same reason people lean forward during a conversation they're deeply involved in. You'll rarely see blind people do this.

      Eyesight can also play a role, but I think that's far more obvious than the reason above.

      The other reason that's applicable to computer games and not console games is the controller configuration. Obviously it's impossible to position your fingers over a keyboard and mouse properly while reclined very far. With a gamepad it's much easier.

      Even if we had reclining chairs that had the keyboard positioned at the proper angle, it still would be difficult to type. Gravity would want to pull our hands away from the proper position, which would strain our arms/wrists instead of our backs.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Best for the back... by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Agreed. When I started reading this, I was leaning back in my chair, probably at about a 135 degree angle. As soon as I was interested, I leaned forward past 90 degrees. If I'm playing a game, I find that if it's boring or easy I lean back, but for a more challenging fight or race or whatever I'll lean forward, perhaps even lifting the back legs of my chair off the ground. It could be that assuming a more relaxed position is... relaxing. And of course, while relaxing is good for your health it is rarely good for productivity.

      Then again I might just need a bigger monitor.

      Disclaimer: this comment was posted at a 135 degree reclined position.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    7. Re:Best for the back... by SoapDish · · Score: 1

      These days whenever I'm playing a video game, I'm standing up swinging my arms, or shadowboxing. If I didn't I'd just look like a toolbox.

      Wiiiiiiiiiiii!

    8. Re:Best for the back... by starwed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But we're also taught to adapt the most relaxed position possible. (At least I was.) My various piano professors all emphasized the importance of a "natural posture." Any unnecessary muscle tension results in wasted energy and can impede movement and accuracy.

    9. Re:Best for the back... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As someone who has spent considerable time behind a real wheel (not a game) racing, let me say that you can be plenty attentive and not at all relaxed while your back is reclined. My drivers seats were never quite at 135 degrees, but they were well past 90.

      I agree you need a bigger monitor. Subconsciously you might be trying to get closer to the action going on in your monitor. When the scene is wrapped around you in real windows, there isn't the same desire to scoot the head forward.

    10. Re:Best for the back... by EchoD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've found the same thing. I try to sit back in my chair and recline a little because, at the end of the day, my back aches less. I also find myself leaning forwards when I'm getting into a game, but I try to force myself to lean back and relax a little. If I'm comfortable, I can enjoy the game longer, relax more quickly when I lay down, and fall asleep faster.

      --
      If I only had a moose...
    11. Re:Best for the back... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      A lot of this has to do with lung capacity. Leaning forward definitely reduces lung capacity, not sure of reclining. In my experience, though, seeing the conductor over the body of a baritone might be a little difficult when reclining....

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:Best for the back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the latest South Park WOW as they're slouched waaay back in their chairs...

      "Ok Kenny, drink your Elixir of the Mongoose - I'm going to use Mocking Blow..."

    13. Re:Best for the back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For sure, you don't want to come to a front desk to find someone reclined asking you if he can help you out with something. That, perhaps, will look lacking interest. So I agree that it doesn't necessarily is the best for your work.

    14. Re:Best for the back... by foobsr · · Score: 1

      When you're standing, your neck doesn't often get tired.

      But proper standing (posture) is a topic in itself (and I suppose that most that have to cope with improper ergonomic conditions have difficulties to do so). I almost believe that even the goal of an at least "good" posture is unattainable given the conditions of "civilization".

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    15. Re:Best for the back... by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Funny

      then your neck ends up bending forward and holding up the weight of your head

      That is why I, as well as millions of my fellow americans, are doing everything we can to be the fattest people on earth. We're simply trying to increase our body mass index to the point where our necks are irrelevant and our shoulders and fat rolls can hold our heads up while we stare into our computers.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    16. Re:Best for the back... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      On a similar note, I've found I can type best (faster, more accurate) in a relaxed position -- leaning back with the keyboard on my lap and my arms at rest. If I have to sit up or lean forward, I quickly notice the increased tension in my shoulders.

      My computer chair is an ancient rattan deck chair, packed with old pillows and couch cushions -- it's ugly and a floor hog, but I can sit comfy in it all day long.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Best for the back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Race driving has a lot of G-forces though, that's why you need to be pushing yourself into your seat. When I'm racing in a game I'm sitting up, in a real go-kart or something then I'm sitting back.

    18. Re:Best for the back... by cornjones · · Score: 1

      From my anecdotal experience with video games, I can definitely say that my performance is much better when I am leaning forward than when I am reclining -- though this may also have something to do with distance from the monitor, etc.

      I believe this would have something to do with leaning forward being a more 'aggressive' stance.

      Which jives w/ my experience as well. Many games I can play in a relaxed position but take a reflex game, like say Burnout and I do a lot better leaning forward. On the harder levels, I can't even pass them if I am leaning back.
    19. Re:Best for the back... by neanderlander · · Score: 1

      The sitting up position is for high attention activities: i find that it is not only my body that is more alert by tensing my muscles, but also my mind becomes sharper. That is fine for a short time. This position is also very handy for homo 'desky'ens: it's hard to lean back and still be able to use the tools on the desk without them falling off. But that high alertness that comes from the upright position can take it's toll when held on for too long. This causes stress. Many bosses want to make sure that their people are paying attention so..., put them in the upright position. A classic approach indeed: we start in school sitting at our small desks, and many people around the globe still sit like that in front of machines they operate (be it a pc, industrial machine lines, etc) Since a few months i am the lucky owner of a laptop again. I was suffering from some back pains, so i moved to my couch, using rather stiff cushioning to get it all right and i find that this postion is great: no more back pains and i'm much more relaxed after a long day of working. But i still use my desktop pc when doing graphical work that requires motoric precision.

    20. Re:Best for the back... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It's also easier to react quickly if you fill more of your vision field with the important information. Large things give stronger response than small things.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  7. WOOT! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    To everyone who has ever criticized my working posture: IN YOUR FACE BITCHES!!!

    I now return you to your regularly scheduled slouching.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:WOOT! by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      Ha!

    2. Re:WOOT! by Speare · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, maintaining an upright position is still the recommended posture when asking people if they "want fries with that."

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    3. Re:WOOT! by Woy · · Score: 1

      For once, i must say it:

      ME TOO!

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
  8. Physician, Scientist... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    My doctor is an armchair anthropologist and is more than happy to ramble on about how the human musculatory, skeletal, and even pulmonary systems are designed for standing and walking, not for sitting. I'm guessing our fat butts are evolutionary from millennia of presiding over lesser beings from a big throne (the people on my TV are so small...).

    Maybe if they made floors all soft and squishy like our sofas, we'd be happier standing? Or better, make computer interfaces use more body parts - standing forever is a pain, but if were doing little tapdances and knee bends the whole day, I bet you could go for hours (okay...maybe not but...).

    1. Re:Physician, Scientist... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      My doctor is an armchair anthropologist and is more than happy to ramble on about how the human musculatory, skeletal, and even pulmonary systems are designed for standing and walking, not for sitting.Then shouldn't he be a standing anthropologist?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Physician, Scientist... by Bamafan77 · · Score: 1
      Maybe if they made floors all soft and squishy like our sofas, we'd be happier standing? Or better, make computer interfaces use more body parts - standing forever is a pain, but if were doing little tapdances and knee bends the whole day, I bet you could go for hours (okay...maybe not but...).
      I know I'm more comfortable standing while working. I even submitted some articles about it to Slashdot. I just wish my employer was more amenable to this.
    3. Re:Physician, Scientist... by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      We had a professor here with a bad lower back who rearranged his office for standing while working. His back (through exercises and not sitting, etc) has improved over the past couple years, so now...he's sitting again.

    4. Re:Physician, Scientist... by jasmak · · Score: 1
      Maybe if they made floors all soft and squishy like our sofas, we'd be happier standing? Or better, make computer interfaces use more body parts - standing forever is a pain, but if were doing little tapdances and knee bends the whole day, I bet you could go for hours (okay...maybe not but...).

      Hopefully we will get to see in our lifetime a common VR setup where your whole body is involved and thus giving you many more commands, possibilities, and 3-D as well as being able to get your daily exercise while scrolling through /.

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
  9. Great timing! by maddogsparky · · Score: 1

    Now I can tell my wife that the time I'm spending getting my laptop to function again has been proven scientifically to be a good idea! (I tend to use my laptop while lounging on the couch or in an overstuffed chair; until it's fixed, I'm stuck using a desktop system while sitting in a chair with a broken back support).

    Wait, I guess that would entail telling her I read it while wasting tim^h^h^h^h^h^h^h reading /.

    Nevermind.

    --
    science is a religion
  10. This is new news? by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

    The ergonomic and safety group here at the company I work for has been saying this for years, mainly for back safety. Keep your legs out and lean back a bit. It eases pressure on your spine.

  11. Workplace changes based on my study of evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Into my vast plain of grey cubes I will release the occasional lion, and instead of payment, I will hide treats in various places and expect my employees to find them on their own.

  12. Duh! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has ever watched Star Trek:TNG knows that the two people at the helm, the ones doing the work, sit in a reclined position while those giving the orders sit in an upright position. Behind them are those that have to stand all day because they didn't have enough room to put in extra seats on the new, improved and larger, Enterprise compared to the original ship.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...stand all day, slouched over the controls embedded in the railing.

    2. Re:Duh! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "'We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires the vast majority of the global population to work in a seated position,' Dr. Bashir said. 'This made our search for the optimal sitting position all the more important.'"

      And anybody who has watched DS9 knows that Dr. Bashir isn't HUMAN- he's a genetic augment.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  13. Obligatory.. by jx100 · · Score: 1
    Dr. Bashir


    I, for one, welcome our genetically engineered ergonomic overlords.
  14. Experts pssh. by Asrynachs · · Score: 0

    I don't actually listen to anything back experts say. If it was up to them nobody would ever bend their backs in any circumstances. Have you ever actually tried to shovel out your driveway by doing all the bending and lifting with only your legs? It's next to impossible. It's always 'lift with your legs, lift with your legs'. It seems to me back experts are just extremely lazy. They don't want to treat any back injuries so they tell people not to use their backs, passing the buck off to the poor knee and leg experts. I can only imagine how many cases those folks get of people throwing out their knees and breaking their hips because they tried to do some activity without bending their back.

    It maks me SICK

    1. Re:Experts pssh. by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      From my experience, back experts believe that if you're going to injure something, break a leg, tear a knee, dislocate a hip, etc. Those can be fixed/replaced. Trying to get your back fixed or replaced can almost be impossible in certain circumstances. The worse thing that can realistically happen with injuring something like your lower extremities is having to get a prosthetic limb (not desireable, but at least livable). Getting a major back injury and you're in trouble. Thus, back experts tell you, don't use your back, its valuable. Kinda a flawed statement though. What else are they going to tell you? Twist while picking things up to stretch? :)

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    2. Re:Experts pssh. by Asrynachs · · Score: 0

      You follow my meaning. It gets annoying. I saw this show where they had an expert on car breaks. This guy actually said using your breaks is bad, the best thing to do is to try an gauge how long it'll take you to stop your car and just take your foot off the gas pedal and let your car roll to a stop. In the event you have to stop on a hill you can ease on the break a BIT but allow your car to rest against the bumper in the car in front or behind you depending on the case; that way your breaks will be saved. AND if you need to stop in a hurry it's better if you just jump out of the car while it's still moving and let it crash into whatever gets in its way. He said provided you're not on a bridge, statistally your car won't sustain that much damage and would likely still be driveable after the crash with the breaks completely in tact.

    3. Re:Experts pssh. by nosredna · · Score: 1

      I look at it the other way. If the doctors who are getting paid to fix my back are telling me that I should be more careful with it to avoid injury, I'm gonna listen. They're just taking money out of their own pockets, so they must take those injuries seriously.

      Now, if your back specialist has a brother who works on knees, I'd recommend getting the tin-foil hat out.

    4. Re:Experts pssh. by visgoth · · Score: 1
      AND if you need to stop in a hurry it's better if you just jump out of the car while it's still moving and let it crash into whatever gets in its way.

      Someone's been playing a little too much San Andreas methinks...

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
  15. Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by greymond · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No seriously, that's what I was told, kinda.

    My work had some ergonomics person come in and monitor us for a few minutes and ask us questions about our chairs and desks. Apparently someone at my work must have developed some sort of carpal tunnel or something because in the 6 years I've been here this was the first time I was ever asked about how I liked my desk or chair. Anyway I don't actually sit in my chair, I tend to curl up into it, and essentially I sit on one leg at a time and lean to the left or right depending on which leg is under me. I also am a big fan of occasionally placing both feet up on the APC under the desk and leaning from side to side.

    In addition to this I don't stay in any one position very long, but rather am constantly shifting or moving from time to time. The lady interviewing me told me that this was actually good and that only people who confine themselves to one given position for a very long time (read entire work day) are the ones who generally have trouble or develop problems with their joints.

    So slither and fidget in your chair, it's good for you.

    1. Re:Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

      I knew that fourth cup of cofee was good for something!

      --
      "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    2. Re:Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Anyway I don't actually sit in my chair, I tend to curl up into it, and essentially I sit on one leg at a time and lean to the left or right depending on which leg is under me. I also am a big fan of occasionally placing both feet up on the APC under the desk and leaning from side to side.

      That's great if you're female or a gymnist. If I tried to do that, my knee and/or hip would literally dislocate from the lateral strain. For the rest of us, standing up and stretching at least once an hour should suffice. Smokers obviously have this down pat.

    3. Re:Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      I actually kept a broken APC under my desk for several years (not plugged into anything) for that exact reason. Actually, your whole post could've been written by me.

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    4. Re:Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by jrumney · · Score: 1

      My work had some ergonomics person come in and monitor us for a few minutes and ask us questions about our chairs and desks.

      I went through the same thing a few years ago. Ergo-woman came around interviewing us to find who needed footstools, monitor stands etc to make their workstations more ergonomic. When she got to me, she asked "do you always sit like this?". "No," I reply, " sometimes I sit like this, or this, or this, or...", "hmmmm, how often do you switch positions?", "Oh, probably about every five minutes", "well OK, is there anything about your workstation you find uncomfortable", "no, I just can't sit still that long". "OK well your posture isn't, ahem, perfect, but as long as you're not holding it for long periods of time, and you feel comfortable, there is no problem."

    5. Re:Curling and slithering like a worm is good too by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      That's great if you're female or a gymnist.

      I can identify with your parent post, and I'm not a woman nor a gymnast. So what does being female have to do with it?

      [Bad joke proceeds below]

      Magical vagina-induced flexibility powers? Perhaps I just spend enough time near a vagina for it to ::ahem:: rub off on me.

      --
      ± 29 dB
  16. Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by KokorHekkus · · Score: 1

    Stokke and other kneeling chairs (see http://www.backinaction.co.uk/kneeling) got it right then and really knew what they were doing. I have tried a chair like that myself for a while when I did some data entry while at the university. It did feel a bit weird first but you felt that 'tensed-tired-back' after sitting on them.

    The negative side? They cost to much I think.

    1. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by greg1104 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Kneeling in a chair pushes much of your body's weight onto your knees and hips. They'll breakdown under the strain just as badly as your spine will over time. I used to like that type of design when I was a kid; after using a kneeling chair for a year in my early 30's, I found my hips so inflammed from it that I still have trouble walking, quite some time later.

      What you want to do is spread your weight over as large a surface area as possible in order to minimize the strain on any one part, which means a chair that leans backward you're resting against. These latest suggestions seems similar to the "Zero Gravity" chairs that claim they're based on NASA research on reducing pressure on the spine (I'd love to find a real citation for that rather than just sales copy). I purchased a cheap recliner based on that type of design from General Superstore that I've been happy with. At the office, I just lean my chair back; after a full day of working my back and hips feel dramatically better in that position than they ever did when I was sitting up straight.

      While I'm babbling on this topic, I'd also suggest those trying to improve their back health look at the recommendations from Dr. Bookspan I've become a real fan of some of the exercises she recommends there, and much of the most useful information from her is free on the web site.

    2. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by jlavi · · Score: 1

      I've had Håg Balans Vital at home for 17 years now. I bought it as a student when my upper back started to hurt due to sitting in bad position on an ordinary chair. I haven't had back problems since then.

      When sitting on the chair I feel pressure on shins and it is somewhat straining over long sessions. Strain on knees or hips may be subjective, but I haven't found sitting on this chair to be especially strenous on knees and hips or causing any damage.

    3. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      after using a kneeling chair for a year in my early 30's, I found my hips so inflammed from it that I still have trouble walking, quite some time later.
      you fat bastard!
    4. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suffered for years with back and neck pain... I purchased a zero gravity chair from Generalsuperstore.com and I love it. This chair really sestresses your back and your neck. I've seen others like Lafuma but why pay $200 - $300. I paid $85 with FREE shipping for the same chair. visit: http://www.generalsuperstore.com/zerogravitychair. html

    5. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by FoogyFoo · · Score: 1

      I've got a question about that chair.

      I've got back problems, so a chair like that is quite enticing. My concern is about the length of the chair. I see from their website, that the chair is 71" long, which is less than 6 feet. I'm worried that my head would be on the metal bar, which would force me to slouch down, which would defeat the whole point of the chair.

      Have you ever had problems with hitting the metal bar near your head, and how tall are you? I'm 5'10", so I guess I'm a little taller than average.

      any info you can provide would be great, thanks.

    6. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My husband is 5' 11.5" and he finds it comfy... his head never touches the tube beacuse of the pillow...

    7. Re:Guess kneeling chairs got it right. by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      I'm 6' tall, and my head just touches the top of the 71" General Store Zero-Gravity chair, while my feet hang an inch or two off the bottom end. There is a pillow they provide for the top area that just keeps my head from hitting the bar and slouching isn't an issue at all. It has considerably more "headroom" than I expected. More of my height is in my upper body than average, so I'd expect that at 5'10 you'd fit even better, unless you're that tall with really short legs.

  17. My Favorte Position by BryanL · · Score: 1

    That's my favorite sexual position as well. What? I have sex...really!

    1. Re:My Favorte Position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blow up dolls don't count... otherwise i also have sex

    2. Re:My Favorte Position by Mykid8yours · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about a blow up sheep?

    3. Re:My Favorte Position by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1
      That's my favorite sexual position as well. What? I have sex...really!

      Even if you're reclining in an office chair at your desk, "browsing for left-handed websites" doesn't count as sex...
  18. Dr. Bashir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dr. Bashir did this study? Life must be more boring on Deep Space 9 after the Dominion War than I thought...

  19. One thing they forgot... by csoto · · Score: 1

    It works best if you put half your palm down your pants, just under the belt, like this guy...

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  20. Finally, some recognition! by Sentry21 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So basically what this study is saying is that by leaning back, putting my feet up on my computer, and moving my keyboard to my lap, I'm not only the most laid-back free-thinking rebel at the office, I'm also the most health-conscious? My boss will be glad to hear it!

  21. Lessons from DS9 by jyuter · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a DS9 episode where Odo was a solid and had back problems from sitting too stiffly. Maybe the Doctors Bashir should consult with each other more often.

    1. Re:Lessons from DS9 by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Likewise, if you look at the first season "Conn" and "Ops" seats on the Enterprise-D on The Next Generation, they were reclined at what I'd guestimate was a 130-140 degree angle... and much of the time, the cast was said to fall asleep in those chairs, proving how comfortable that seated position was. Guess they knew something too.

  22. Admiral Rickover knew this... by scheming+daemons · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I work for a Navy contractor. Admiral Hyman Rickover, the founder of the "nuclear navy", was your typical hard-ass type-A personality.

    In his office he had two inches chopped off of the front two legs of his "guest" chairs, which forced guests in his office to be leaning forward. This put them in an uncomfortable position and gave him a subliminal "upper hand" over his guests.

    Adm. Rickover knew this 50 years ago. This study is nothing but a confirmation of common sense.

    --
    "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
    don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    1. Re:Admiral Rickover knew this... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      It's likely that 50 years ago (during the cold war) there weren't many Soviet admirals walzting around the Nautilus. So we can assume he was doing this to fellow officers only.

      That said, what an ass.

    2. Re:Admiral Rickover knew this... by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      yes.... many in the Navy considered him "an ass".... or worse. But they were all intimidated by him and he was able to have complete autonomy in running the AEC (Atomic Energy Commission) because of it.

      the thing with the chair legs was just another example of his intimidation techniques. ;-)

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    3. Re:Admiral Rickover knew this... by silentounce · · Score: 0

      I wonder if he is related to him.
       
      In other news, I've heard that story before and it reeks of urban legend, but I couldn't find anything to debunk it on the web.

      --
      There are many tongues to talk, and but few heads to think. -Victor Hugo
    4. Re:Admiral Rickover knew this... by aditi · · Score: 1

      3 cheers for Admiral Rickover! (Any Rickoids out there?)

  23. Welcome to the 70's by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The summary is a little misleading. The article actually doesn't say anything about reclining, it is talking about a lap to abdomen angle greater than 90 degrees, with the optimal angle being about 135 degrees. This isn't a new finding, though perhaps this is the first research backing it up. People have been making kneeling chairs for a long time now. I had one when I was in high school.

    Since I have never found a kneeling chair that doesn't suck I tend to sit on the edge of my chair with my knees down, roughly approximating the "optimal" 135 degree angle. Rough on the chair, but over the long haul it makes my back happier.

    1. Re:Welcome to the 70's by Peyna · · Score: 1

      it is talking about a lap to abdomen angle greater than 90 degrees, with the optimal angle being about 135 degrees

      So the easiest way to achieve this and still be able to work is to raise your seat height a little bit. Of course, then your keyboard might be too low and you'll be bending your wrists backwards.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Welcome to the 70's by Stormy+Henderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The entire article is misleading with regards to 135 degrees being optimum. They only tested 3 positions: hunched forward, straight up (90 degrees), and reclining (135 degrees). Not surprisingly, 135 degrees was better than the other two. But it's hardly optimum. They didn't test 95 degrees, 100 degrees, 130 degrees, etc., to find a true optimum. That's a study I'd like to see. For the geometrically challenged, such as myself, the 135-degree thigh-back angle they mention can be more simply explained as reclining at a 45-degree angle. Isn't that easier to understand? They could have said that to begin with.

    3. Re:Welcome to the 70's by Plutonite · · Score: 1

      It's probably 100.42 degrees.

    4. Re:Welcome to the 70's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They only tested 3 positions... 135 degrees was better than the other two. But it's hardly optimum. They didn't test 95 degrees, 100 degrees, 130 degrees, etc.
      What are you, a bending robot?

      Bender: Are you kidding? I was a star. I could bend a girder to any angle. 30 degrees, 32 degrees, you name it. 31... But I couldn't go on living once I found out what the girders were for.
      Fry: What for?
      Bender: Suicide booths.

  24. missing the point by drDugan · · Score: 1

    Main bullet from TFA:
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2475021, 00.html
    * "back pain is part of human nature"

    This is crap. Most "human nature" is a result of our activities and culture (long term), not the cause. The real nature of people is very simple: have the good feelings and avoid the bad ones. That is it. Most everything else about how we act is learned.

    We need to rethink this idea that humans have evolved to be ABLE to sit in a cubicle for 8 hours a day, 200 days a year and function. They didn't. Humans need to be active, challenged and mobile. The reason sitting people have back pain is because they are sitting so much. Hmmmm, let's arrange the deck chairs and tell people to sit differently???

    1. Re:missing the point by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

      sit in a cubicle for 8 hours a day, 200 days a year and function

      Man, I wish I got as much vacation time as you!

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    2. Re:missing the point by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      We need to rethink this idea that humans have evolved to be ABLE to sit in a cubicle for 8 hours a day, 200 days a year and function. They didn't.

      More basic than that -- they can't. Evolution usually takes, oh, several million years?

    3. Re:missing the point by drDugan · · Score: 1

      exactly. during those several million years of human evolution, mostly there were no cubicles and no office chairs. what humans are doing today is not how we evolved. this is causing our pain.

      I was not implying that we should (or could) evolve to fit the cubicle chairs, but that we should change what we do to better fit the bodies humans have evolved.

    4. Re:missing the point by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      That's only 10 days off a year. I get that many paid holidays. Most people also get 10 vacation days and possibly sick leave. I'll admit that 8 hours a day is on the low side for most people in IT, but 200 days a year is realistic.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    5. Re:missing the point by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Assuming a 5 day work week, times 50, that's 250 days of work. 105 weekend days. Not counting Holidays.

      Counting a standard 10 holidays, that's off from your numbers by 40 days, or nearly two months of paid leave.

    6. Re:missing the point by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1
      We need to rethink this idea that humans have evolved to be ABLE to sit in a cubicle for 8 hours a day, 200 days a year and function. They didn't.

      More basic than that -- they can't. Evolution usually takes, oh, several million years?


      For humans, maybe, I don't really know, but for evolution in general it depends entirely on average lifespan. For humans today further natural* evolution seems unlikely -- Our long lifespans, ability to control our environment (AC, heating, etc), and healthcare industry tend to counteract anything that would otherwise be a direct cause of evolution. Compare this to viruses which can evolve in a much smaller timespan due to constant reproduction and dying, and being forced to live in adverse environments.

      * Thats assuming you don't count our genetic engineering as a form of evolution. It could be argued that getting to the point where you can do this stuff was part of evolution, and any product of that is just an extension of the evolution.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    7. Re:missing the point by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The reason sitting people have back pain is because they are sitting so much.

      At university I was spending over 100 hours a week sitting at computers. Add cycling to/from uni, to/from work, time in lectures/seminars, time sat in the pub and about the only time I didn't spend sitting was spent sleeping or playing Pool or Ultimate.

      Since leaving Uni the amount of sitting I do has possibly increased.

      I don't get back pain.

      Sitting does not cause back pain.

    8. Re:missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sitting does not cause back pain." ... for you.

  25. How old were the test subjects ? by richg74 · · Score: 1
    I'm wondering about the age of the subjects of this experiment, and whether that might have affected the results. When I was younger (in my thirties, say), I would probably have said that the conclusion of the study was obvious. Now I'm in my fifties, and I get quite uncomfortable if I have to sit in a typical "reclined" position for more than a few minutes; I much prefer a straight-backed chair. (There are some reclining seats that I'm comfortable in, but not many.)

    I do have some arthritis in my lower back, probably aggravated by a cycling crash a few years ago. Maybe that accounts for the difference, but I'm still curious.

    1. Re:How old were the test subjects ? by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Well now we know why youngin's slouch and geezers yell "Sit up straight!"

      The easiest way, of course, is to use reverse psychology. Get on my lawn!

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  26. Why not go on? by gusmao · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sitting in a angle smaller than 90 degrees -> bad
    Sitting upright -> better
    Sitting in 135 degrees -> healthy
    Sitting in 180 degrees -> wow, that feels great!

    So basically they've found out that the more you incline backward the less you put preassure on your body. Very impressive. Too bad we can't lay down and work at the same time.

    1. Re:Why not go on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad we can't lay down and work at the same time.

      Prostitutes found a way.

    2. Re:Why not go on? by killmenow · · Score: 5, Funny
      Too bad we can't lay down and work at the same time.
      There is a profession (perhaps the oldest) in which this is quite common.
    3. Re:Why not go on? by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Funny

      FYI, I just tried sitting at 270 degrees, figuring if 90 was better and 180 is great, then 270 must be awesome. Anyway, I highly disrecommend it.

    4. Re:Why not go on? by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      ...except the ones that excel in that profession.

    5. Re:Why not go on? by unix_core · · Score: 1

      Cool, where can I apply for a job like that?

    6. Re:Why not go on? by boingo82 · · Score: 1

      I wish I had points for you. I just keep cracking up at this post. :D

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    7. Re:Why not go on? by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 0

      So what would 270 degrees feel like?

      Very hot!

      Okay, I'll go back into my box now.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    8. Re:Why not go on? by AugustZephyr · · Score: 1

      Your comment just made my day. I laughed so hard I ended up sitting at almost 360 degrees.

      OUCH!!!

    9. Re:Why not go on? by jakoz · · Score: 1

      Politician?

    10. Re:Why not go on? by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      Fry: "Professor, we're all sick of your new upbeat attitude."
      Professor: "Nonsense! It's just in the song I wrote! 'We all need a new angle on life! ..."
      Leela: "Bender, you've gotta help us!"
      Bender: "I try to get out, but they keep pulling me back in!"
      Professor: *crack* "OWW!"
      Amy: "No! Bender! The other way!"
      Bender: "I like him better this way."
      Professor: "I'm sad now ..."

    11. Re:Why not go on? by ShinySteelRobot · · Score: 1
      > Too bad we can't lay down and work at the same time.
      There is a profession (perhaps the oldest) in which this is quite common.
      Farmer?
    12. Re:Why not go on? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Since you've used the word "lay" down inappropriately, instead of "lie" down, you have grammatically answered your own question.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  27. That's what I always do. by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    I always lean back while working at the computer. My posterior is close to the front edge of the chair and the bottoms of my shoulder blades are on top of the back of the chair. My shoulders, neck, and head are actually behind the chair, and my legs are out front. This violates every rule that I learned and repeated to my typing classes. My family has a history of back problems, and yet I work 8 hours a day like this and I am perfectly comfortable. I'm glad that someone is looking in to this. Now we just have to convince observers that taking this position doesn't mean you are lazy.

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  28. seated position? by p33p3r · · Score: 0

    How does this information relate to career politician's longevity
    by bending over backwards to special interest groups, than
    standing tall before the constituents that voted them into office?

  29. herniated disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I herniated my S5-L1 disc last month while getting out of bed. For me, sitting up straight or leaning forward are the absolute worst positions. Now, I get quick feedback down my sciatic nerve. If I need to sit down, leaning back at 135 degrees is definitely the way to go. Standing up or laying down are the most comfortable positions.

  30. Well-founded study by c0nst · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. this 135 posture is so relaxing. I cn typ relly well.z.z.zzzzzzz

    1. Re:Well-founded study by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      "Well clearly, he didn't fall asleep typing it. Why would he type 'zzz' then click submit?"

      "Maybe he was dictating it."

  31. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    Oh my, how major? I can't take this news sitting down!

  32. Feet up even better by RPGonAS400 · · Score: 1
    If my back is at the 135 degree mark, and my feet are on my desk, better yet!!

    Now all I need to do is forward this to my boss (and make sure my eyes are open).

  33. My neck, my back... by llZENll · · Score: 1

    (Kia) first you got to put your neck into, come on... o wait...

    I find that when leaning back my neck gets sore only after a few hours, perhaps if your monitor was hung from the ceiling 135 would be good, but for a long period of time I think you are going to have just as many neck problems as back problems.

  34. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    The "slouch" position revealed a reduction in spinal disk height, signifying a high rate of wear and tear on the lowest two spinal levels. Across all measurements, the researchers concluded that the 135-degree position fared the best.

    Um, ok....

    "This may be all that is necessary to prevent back pain, rather than trying to cure pain that has occurred over the long term due to bad postures," he added. "Employers could also reduce problems by providing their staff with more appropriate seating, thereby saving on the cost of lost work hours."

    IOW, they proved what they thought and used it to make conclusions not proven. What utter rubbish.

    They also did not take into account how people sat before this study. Sitting up stright is uncomfortable at first, but in general becomes very comfortable, and keeps the person more alert. Playing piano in any position other that straight up will cuase hand or back pain, and people with chronic back pain need to sit up stright to feel comfortable.

    What utter rubbish.

  35. Created??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were not created to sit down for long hours

    Of course not, we evolved that way.

    With early ancestors walking on all four, and later standing up (which is already bad for the back) and not having Aeron chairs to sit on for the past millions of years, it seems natural that we're certainly not designed for sitting down.

    Seems like another argument against creation... Or for a lousy creator. :-P

  36. Kneeling Chair by miro2 · · Score: 1

    This is the theory behind the kneeling chair, which keeps your body open at about 135-degrees. Many people feel uncomfortable when they first try them out. But it only takes a day or two to adjust. Ive been using mine for years and swear that it has improved my posture and keeps me from getting tired.

    1. Re:Kneeling Chair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the theory behind the kneeling chair, which keeps your body open at about 135-degrees. Many people feel uncomfortable when they first try them out. But it only takes a day or two to adjust.

      I never managed to adjust to the sliding slowly forwards, but my pants staying at the same position, thus sliding my pants up my ass-crack. Neither did I ever adjust to having most of my weight on my knees.

      (My mother bought one of those chairs for my father when he had back problems, but it being labelled "computer chair", my mother thought it should be placed in front of the computer, which my father never uses, so I was the one sitting on it).

    2. Re:Kneeling Chair by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I absolutely loved my kneeling chair for the first couple of months or so, until it began seriously aggrivating my knees and I had to switch back to a conventional chair. Did this happen to you at all? If so, how did you work around it? I'd switch back to it in a second if I could eliminate the knee problems.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  37. Wait by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about hanging upside down? If only they had found hanging upside down to be the healthiest non-standing posture, we could look forward to a wide array of new chair/desk/computer arrangements. And don't even get me started on how happy many big corps would be if they could hang employees from the ceiling, doubling the number of people they can cubicalize in a given space.

  38. If it's too late for you.... by gilgongo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this news comes too late for you and you are already feeling the effects of your lower back being gradually compacted to the point where even standing up for much longer than 10mins begins to ache, then act now to reverse the effects!

    - Avoid sitting. Stand up and walk around every half hour. More often if possible.

    - When you are sitting, try to lean back like TFA says.

    - Every night, before you go to bed, decompress your lower spine: lie on your back and put a few books (about 4-5 inches high) beneath your coccyx. NOT the small of you back - I'm talking about the top of your butt-crack: there is a flat area of bone there, put the pile of books there and lie out flat with your arms over your head for a few minutes. If it hurts - then it's doing some good. If you feel a "crack" then even better: that's some tension coming out.

    - Turn over and do the "cobra" position. Plant your hands on the floor and jam your hips down to the ground so that your spine bends backwards in a massive curve. Keep this position (and keep your head and neck up straight) for a few minutes at a time.

    - If you're not fit, consider also doing some stomach curls (Google 'em) and lower back strengthening routines. The better your musculature is around there, the better those muscles can support your spine and prevent injury by sudden movement. Movement which, if your lower spine is compressed by lots of sitting, will be more damaging.

    There is it. Your 5-mins per day spinal insurance policy.

    Disclaimer: I am not a doctor - I'm (former) back pain sufferer that got rid of the pain by doing the above.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:If it's too late for you.... by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

      The thing you're doing with the books, ...; here's a different twist on it:

            k---f k = knees
              \ f = feet
                \ b = butt
      h-----b h = head

      Imagine that you are positioned as such, lying on your back, on the floor, perpendicular to a wall so that your feet are flat on that wall. Now reproduce the same position, but instead of having your feet against the wall, (and thus having to *work* to keep your legs straight,) you rest your lower legs on a chair that is facing you, so that your butt is slightly under the chair.

      Twenty to forty-five minutes of this every day, depending on the seriousness of your condition, and you'll sleep like a baby, and will help reduce the inflammation to your nerves caused by your lower back remaining strained most of the time.

      Having three herniated disks, I've been through a lot of physical therapies, and this is by far the most benefit I've ever received from any one type of exercise or treatment.

    2. Re:If it's too late for you.... by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      I heard the "angry cat" is good too. So is the "downward facing dog".

    3. Re:If it's too late for you.... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      As a 28 y/o who recently did something to his back (who knows what) I really appreciate your post.

      I lost about 40lbs, started lightly excercising - things were great - then one day mild back / shoulder pain.
      Next thing you know for 2 days I couldn't look down - I could look straight at my display but to look down at the k/b was pain.

      That was 6 weeks ago - it's eased up and moved substantially lower but I've been in light pain ever since - very unhappy with it all - I was just beggining to become fit for the first time too.

      I'll try some of this and see how I go.

    4. Re:If it's too late for you.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why I leave my office every hour or so, and have a cigarette outside, the only way to keep healthy....

  39. Extrapolating.... by Junta · · Score: 1

    So if 90 degree is worst, 90 degree is medium, 135 degree is better, 180 degree should be best.

    I think my work place should let me work lying down completely, for my health....

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Extrapolating.... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      And extending beyond to 270 degrees should actually have healing properties!

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  40. Re:No chairs on ST:TNG by jimwelch · · Score: 1

    Actually the outside ring (science 1 & 2) had chairs, that came out of the console. They were used in several episodes. The directors only used them when a shot worked better sitting down. If they are standing up, they "fly" prettier when a weapon hits.

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  41. They are not talking about kneel-chairs by dstone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article actually doesn't say anything about reclining

    No, the article specifically describes the posture as reclining. FTFA:
    The patients assumed ... a "relaxed" position where the patient reclines backward 135 degrees while the feet remain on the floor.

    You could achieve the 135 degree angle with a kneel-chair, but that's not what these researchers studied, so their conclusion can't necessarily be extended to kneel-chairs.

    1. Re:They are not talking about kneel-chairs by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 1

      You're right. *sigh* Back to reading comprehension 101 for me. In any case I suspect that the posture aspect (feasible at work) has more to do with reduced back pain than the reclining (not feasible at work), but the research has compounded the study of posture and back support in such a way that no really useful conclusion can be drawn about either aspect separately. Oh well...maybe next time.

  42. Is 135 degrees really necessary? by kevintron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad the article doesn't mention what the researchers plan to investigate next. An angle of 135 degrees between torso and thighs puts you halfway to lying down flat on your back. I'd be interested in learning whether similar benefits can be gained by reclining to just 100 degrees, or 105, or maybe 110.

    Old-school management types might more readily accept a slightly reclined posture than one that takes your torso 45 degrees away from the vertical.

    1. Re:Is 135 degrees really necessary? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1
      An angle of 135 degrees between torso and thighs puts you halfway to lying down flat on your back.


      Only if you obtain the 135 degree angle while keeping your thighs parallel to the floor. Right now, I am sitting near the forward edge of my chair, with my knees pointing towards the floor and my feet crossed on the floor, almost directly under my butt. My back? It's perpendicular to the floor, even though I'm pretty close to 135 degrees between my spine and thighs. It looks something like this:

        O
        |__
        |
          \
            \
            /
          /

      Okay, the ASCII art sucks, but you get the idea :)

      If you've ever used the kneeling chairs that I first saw in the early '80s, it's approximating that sitting position in a regular office chair by angling the seat downwards in the front with your legs tucked back under you body below the seat. The good thing is that, unlike the kneeling chairs I've used in the past, this doesn't hurt your shins.
      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    2. Re:Is 135 degrees really necessary? by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Or 180. Not lying down, but simply standing. Standing desks have existed for a long time.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    3. Re:Is 135 degrees really necessary? by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Have you tried standing up for an extended period? In one place? It hurts!

      I relate strongly to the research findings. I'm currently sat in my default position - leaning backwards diagonally, chair turned slightly so I'm leaning almost sideways at a 45 degree angle against the back of the chair, the desk curving to that side so that arm is resting flat along the desk. The other arm is resting flat on my hip and the desk, supported in the middle by part of my body that I've evolved to be a fine arm-rest when sat in this position. (At other times it's described as my belly)

      Muscles under tension below the neck..? None. Therefore strain on my body..? Minimal.

      Maybe doesn't work for everybody, and in a few minutes I'll switch and lean the other way, but I do this pretty much all the time.

      Standing however hurts. Don't do it!

    4. Re:Is 135 degrees really necessary? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Old-school management types will be old men with bad backs soon. Don't worry about it.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  43. Way off the point by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    52*2=104 Weekends
    365-104=261 Work Days
    261-200=61 Vacation Days

    I want your job, my back would definitely feel better :P

    1. Re:Way off the point by drDugan · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've structured my job to be active, challenging and mobile. I'm rarely in a cubicle and that's the way I have it for my employees.

      200 was just a guess that I didn't give much thought to it. I guess with 10 vacation days the typical US worker spends the other 51 in meetings. ;)

  44. Original statement by benhocking · · Score: 1
    However, the original statement (FTFS) was:
    "'We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires the vast majority of the global population to work in a seated position,' Dr. Bashir said.
    So, although I was questioning "vast majority", it was in the context of the "work" comment.
    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  45. The study was flawed, and here's why. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Disk movement was most pronounced with a 90-degree upright sitting posture.

    An "upright 90-degree sitting posture" usually isn't. Try sitting in a 90 position, without curving your lower back. Chances are you can't do it. If you can, you're either still young and flexible, or you've been doing yoga for a while.

    No wonder the study concluded that sitting up straight isn't good for your back. The participants probably couldn't even do it properly.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  46. Re:No chairs on ST:TNG by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Yup, you're absolutely correct. As soon as I read what you wrote, the episode where the Ferengi had taken over the Enterprise and Riker had to explain how to manipulate the engines came to mind. That's the one where Picard and others had been regressed to an early childhood.

    The other episode that comes to mind is the one with the Binars. Data is sitting at one of the seats trying to decipher the code and near the end of the show it is Picard and Riker who sit at the chairs and together, figure out how the code works.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  47. Re:Augment vs Human by jimwelch · · Score: 1

    Bigot!

    How do we define human? Can a Augment and a Human mate? Does that make them the same? I heard something about cats and dogs can mate! Are they the same species?? NO!

    --
    Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  48. "reclined backward 135 degrees" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoa, that doesn't sound healthy at all. I could see myself reclining backwards anywhere from 0 to 90 degrees when sitting down, but 135 degrees? That's just crazy.

  49. Lumbar support by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    I have three herniated disks in my lower back, (the result of a creative snowboarding moment,) and can confirm that the only way to hold the 90% position without harming yourself is with actual lumbar support built-in to the chair, otherwise, being reclined is your only safe bet.

    I know this not because it seems or feels better but because it is the only way that I can sit all day and retain the ability to walk normally without structural pain.

    A lot of the "ergonomic" chairs I've tried offer endless control over how the chair can be inclined, or how high it and the arm rests can be, but they fail in this basic regard.

  50. Missing Option(s) by MrCopilot · · Score: 4, Funny
    Laying Down.

    On knees under my desk

    My secretary says both work great for her.

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  51. Duck Hunt... by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    Yes, I too always did better sitting close to the screen while playing Duck Hunt...

  52. 135 degrees by vogon+jeltz · · Score: 1

    Bending backwards sure feels OK sometimes. But how the fuck do I reach my keyboard? ;-)

    1. Re:135 degrees by vidarh · · Score: 1

      You use a laptop and put a pillow on your abdomen or beside you.... I love working from home, reclining on the sofa...

  53. Imagine that.. by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    The most comfortable position is also the most healthy, who'da thunk it?

  54. Re:Augment vs Human by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

    A Trill and an Augment can mate...

    --
    -
  55. Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'We were not created to sit down for long hours...'

    We were created to sit on our knees. Repent, and be free of pain!

  56. I thought of South Park and WoW. :) by Bamafan77 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Or did you start to slouch the moment you read this?
    I got this mental image of Cartman and gang on the WoW episode of Southpark during their 6 week power-leveling marathon. :)
    1. Re:I thought of South Park and WoW. :) by nb+caffeine · · Score: 1

      You're not the only one. First thing I thought of.

      Lean back, i guess

      --

      "Something's wrong with you...and I hope we never do meet again." - Deftones When Girls Telephone Boys
  57. From the future? by tesmar · · Score: 1

    From the article: "'We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires the vast majority of the global population to work in a seated position,' Dr. Bashir said. Later, the good doctor was found sending a priority one message to Starfleet to inform Admiral Janeway.

  58. The perfect chair. by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine once worked at a firm that really valued their employees and thus they had some experts show up and speak with everyone about posture and such. This resulted in, other than education/training being dispensed in this matter, a pilot program where one third of the staff ended up using this "perfect chair", where you are actually kneeling on it rather than sitting. I forget the brand and model, but I got to try it on occasion as I would work there from time to time as a consultant, and it's quite true that I've never used anything as comfortable.

    The one I got to use anytime I was there was left alone, unused, in the server room. Knowing that these items were somewhat expensive, I asked how come it was being left there instead of assigned to anyone's desk, only to be explained that after a several weeks of usage, and despite everyone being completely satisfied with the chairs as far as comfort (ergonomics) were concerned, the chairs fell out of favour gradually, with none of them being used within two months of the start of the pilot project. The project was eventually considered a flop though the cause of its failure was never officially explained.

    It turns out, something I was told in confidence, that one of the staff's managers liked to walk around and give out instructions, priorities and reprimands at everyone's desks rather than in private in the manager's office.

    This may have already been an unpleasant practise, but had then become a humiliating one, due to the new chairs, since the staff was now kneeling before their boss while taking the abuse!

  59. My body knew this, even if I didn't. by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I've been a recliner for as long as I can remember. Doesn't matter where or why I'm sitting; I always sit with a recline. Even on chairs with a fixed back, I slide my pelvis forward so that I can recline. I've tried to sit up straight, and I have great standing posture, but my body always works back to the recline.

    I've been coding for almost a decade, and I'm the only person I know without back problems. I guess my body knows better than I do.

  60. Um... by sootman · · Score: 1

    "From the article: 'We were not created to sit down for long hours...' "

    Um... so, what are we supposed to do all day long? Stand? Walk? Lay? I'm pretty sure the idea of sitting came about from the first cavemen who noticed that sitting on rocks* made it possible to sea each other, and their surroundings, better than when they were laying down, and more comfortably and easily than standing. I think this is a flawed premise--nothing is "ideal" to do all day long. I get sore from laying for a long time, and standing and walking are too much work to do for hours at a time.

    * or sitting down cross-legged, or squatting

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  61. Support... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    135 degrees is a great trunk-leg angle, but only if your weight is supported down to your bottom. Slouching down to 135 deg in a "regular" 90 deg chair will buy you some expensive back surgery in your mid 30's.

    Trust me, I know.

    1. Re:Support... by Cederic · · Score: 1


      This is an excellent point. I'm a habitual recliner - sitting at approx. 135 degrees - but my back is resting (almost sideways) against the back of the chair, which I've set to that angle.

      A lot of people think my chairs at home and in the office are broken, because they are set to that steep an angle almost permanently, but it means I can sit in complete relaxation, fully supported, and maintain that posture for extended periods without discomfort (I switch whether I lean back and left or back and right at frequent intervals).

  62. Finally by Slugster · · Score: 1

    My geek bicycle is vindicated: http://www.cyclegenius.com/ltx.html
    -------
    (-not that I had much doubt, but anyway-)
    ~

  63. Thank You by gcottay · · Score: 1

    Thanks for giving me one more reason to continue leaning forward into the notebook screen rather than buying new glasses or a bigger screen.

  64. It may be good for your back... by kakofb · · Score: 1

    But leaning back means you're stretching your arms to reach the keyboard and mouse, which puts a lot of strain on your tendons and can result in RSI/carpel tunnel.

  65. Re:Is it just me... Reminds me of.. by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Help wanted. Many positions available" images...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  66. I have an ergonomic couch... by haggie · · Score: 1

    ...and didn't even know it! Cool!

  67. How to sit when driving then? by jckrbbt · · Score: 1

    I don't have a long commute to work, but tend to recline a bit when driving. I'm not as bad as some that are basically lying down and looking through the steering wheel, but I'm not at the recommended 135 degree angle.

    Majority of my driving is highway based and faster the posted highway speeds where you want to see the deer before they try to cross traffic.

  68. No your not. by jozmala · · Score: 1

    If you raise your feet on your computer and still have your neck-ass-feet line in 135 degrees isn't really the healthy position. Nor 90 degrees position.

    --
    ©God :Copyright is exclusive right for creator to determine the use of his creation.
  69. Reclining by MrIbanez · · Score: 1

    The only reason why modern chairs and such are designed for a 90 degree sitting position is that it is probably one of the most efficient positions to work in. Reclining promotes laziness and sleepiness. Hard to work when you're feeling lazy and sleepy...
    However, even the Greeks (I think... correct me if it was the Romans or whoever else) found that eating while reclining was the most comfortable way to eat. Most of the upper class Greeks would lie down on their reclined chairs while they eat dinner at parties and other social events. I guess the Greeks had it right from the first place

  70. Paid More Standing Up by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


    People who work sitting down get paid more
    than people who work standing up. (Odgen Nash)

  71. I get more frags when I slouch forward... by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

    Alternatively, when I lean back when I play CS, I tend to be on the receiving end of the AWP.

    ~CYD

    --
    //Nothing to see here, please move along.
  72. They make to many assumptions by sinistre · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. The intervertebral disc is NOT the only thing that can cause back pain. Slouching may unload the intervertebral disc but it will put strain on other structures.

    2. Intervertebral discs NEED load too - it's actually healthy for the disc. So unloading it all day will make it weaker and could actually lead to a disc prolapse.

    3. One study recently showed that it was actually beneficial for your discs if you were overweight! However if you do have a degenerated disc - it becomes more a part of the problem. Still the rest of your discs will need to be loaded.

    4. Another study that tried to identify risk factors for long term disability in workers found that x-rays and MRI's gave little value - one factor that actually did prove to be a risk was if the worker was miserable at work.

    Which brings me to my point; Keep moving. No one posture is good or bad for your back - they all become bad if you sustain them for too long. The worst thing a back patient can do is to stop using their backs. I always encourage my patients (I'm a physical therapist with a masters in manual therapy) to keep moving!

    1. Re:They make to many assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would the postural muscles be weakened by slouching in a supported position?

      What about those fitness balls? They give you a bigger angle while still causing you to use your postural muscles, and are fun too.

      What does this mean for all those people sitting cross legged?

    2. Re:They make to many assumptions by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the most glaring assumption, that back strain is the only thing that we should use to judge seating posture. Quality of life is far harder to measure than that. Other factors that might be considered are how the seating posture effects the tightness of your abs, leg pains (some chairs actually make my legs go numb), the availability of a good carpal tunnel prevention solution that mates with the posture, alertness, effectiveness of lungs in maintaining blood oxygen levels, how you look (real consideration for many), etc. This is very much akin to studies that assume we all want to live longer at virtually any cost or that we all have limitless willpower to fight biologically reinforced habits.

      We are a long long way from science being able to give us personalized solutions that strike a balance in the nearly limitless factors contributing to health decisions. Even life and death decisions are only sometimes near black and white. The medical establishment as a whole needs to be woken up to the fact that we aren't even really out of the dark ages of medicine until we can address every human as a unique biological, psychological, and spiritual being. This problem permeates modern medicine all the way to its core, even to the hypocratic oath itself which states "I will follow that system of regimen which, according to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous.", a statement full of "I"s and "my"s without any "your"s that would cause the physician to consider the uniqueness, desires, or personal quality of life measurements of the individual being treated.

    3. Re:They make to many assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your complaints about the Hippocratic oath are due to a confusion about the English used. "I" and "my" are used to denote the first person, in this case the doctor taking the oath. "my patient" is indicating the third person, the patients that he is treating. "You" or "your" would be the second person, and would indicate the person he is speaking to while taking the oath.

      The oath states that the doctor will do the best he can for his patients, which includes taking them as an individual. Your criticism should be directed towards any doctor that does not treat his patients as individuals, not towards the oath.

      Ooh, appropriate capthca - "dunces"

    4. Re:They make to many assumptions by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      Well, in today's world, that would be any doctor who follows insurance or industry (AMA) scripted treatment protocols or any of many laws as opposed to applying all of his knowledge, all the facts that he can gather about the patient both physical and otherwise, and all of his instinct to recommend a custom course of action that is best for the patient regardless of industry, insurance, or legal issues.

      Hmmmm. I think that would pretty much cover every doctor but one that I've encountered in the last 15 years. Diagnosis and treatment of individuals as unique individuals is in many cases illegal and at best puts the doctor at unacceptable risk for suit.

      Witness the many drugs that are refused approval due to killing as few as a hundred out of a million people, even when methods are available to determine who, due to their uniqueness, is likely to be one of those hundred and even though the judgement of what risk is worth taking is a hugely personal decision. There are many glaring examples of drugs that work well on the vast majority of people being blocked due to this. Some of these drugs can be safely administered simply by seeing that the individual is not of a particular race that has proven very vulnerable to a particular side effect. Thus the decision is being taken away from the doctor due to the fact that some "people" are hurt by a therapy even though the "individual" patient the doctor is seeing could be determined to be a safe candidate or careful monitoring of the therapy could avoid the risk.

      I am currently being denied androgel therapy by the fact that I can't find a doctor near my current location that has adopted new thinking on it. While receiving this therapy in another city, I had many health problems go away including goutic arthitis and other joint issues, frequent muscle and tendon injuries, pinched nerves due to inflammation and swelling (as in CTS in both hands, Urnal tunnel and shoulder issues, memory, and clarity problems. Now that I cannot receive it, all of the problems have returned and my current doctors are treating them with far less success using combinations of many drugs with side effects that are really bothering me and multiple surgeries. This is my personal example of doctors following their "conventional" wisdom to my known and proven detriment and over all of my attempts to correct the situation. And they do so because of pseudo-scientific, ie. statistical, based studies have shown them that there are "probabilities" that I could have serious side effects in spite of many studies showing that different men have different requirements for testosterone and that many men benefit greatly from treatment without having undesirable side effects. The one physician who treated me put aside the conventional rules and continually ran batteries of blood and other tests to make sure that I as an individual needed, was benefitting from, and was not being harmed by the treatment.

      In short, I agree with your argument as to the language, however, the effective and practiced definition/understanding of practices or process guidelines placed in writing such as the hippocratic oath should be judged from their results and the practices of those who are utilizing it. There are mounds of evidence both in law and otherwise that the statistical or population based approach that classifies a patient's problem within a rather narrow pool of possibilities that frequently maps 100s of problems to a single diagnosis and then uses a prescribed treatment for that classification with little individualization is the predominate medical practice of the day. This medical practice represents a huge injustice and abuse of the individual.

      And to get back to the article, studies that shoot to identify blanket health recommendations that statistically benefit the population as opposed to identifying or lowering the cost of direct physics, biological, chemical, etc. based testing means that might be applied to an individual to assist them in more closely, perhaps even daily

  73. Gaston new this all along! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  74. I got this chair by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    And I think it's one of the best ever made: http://www.stokke.com/functionality.asp?na=NO&la=E N&div=C&nr=01&p=Variable I recommend it to every office worker.

  75. bodybilts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bodybilt chair has been doing the >90 degree thing for a while - you recline back, then tilt your seat pan up - sort of like being launched forward, so you're body is open to 135 degrees, or wherever you're comfortable, but you're not reclined - you're sort of pushed forward, as if your reclined chair were actually a cannon and it were trying to eject you or something.

    It takes some getting used to for some people, and you are by no means obligated to use a >90 degree angle, but the Bodybilt (I'm using one now) makes it possible to have that 135 degree angle without you having to recline. I've tended to use them in a traditional, 90 degree fashion, but recently I've been experimenting with tilting the seatpan forward, and reclining the back back. It's quite comfortable, actually -- you're not really "sitting down", you're almost like "kind of" standing a little bit. But you are sitting down. The chairs are designed to do this.

    Problem is getting your employer to shell out $800+ for one...

  76. Doesn't work for horseback riding... by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, this study will never apply to horseback riding. It's 90 degress straight up or you'll bust your arse, or get stepped on.

    I'd love to be able to lay on my back and code. I could build my own assembly for this, but the Mouse would be the tricky part. If it was just split keyboards, it would be cake.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  77. Creationism in disguise! by Dougthebug · · Score: 1

    "We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires the vast majority of the global population to work in a seated position"

    We were not created at all. We evolved, and will continue to evolve until sitting all day is comfortable!

    Example:
    http://www.wagnerur.hu/computer_internet/evolution .jpg

  78. Variety by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find that changing my position is the most friendly to my back. Variety is the key, not a specific position. Shift every 15 minutes or so.

  79. Ok Geniuses ... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    ... now design me a desk to hold my shit at that complimentary angle WHILE AND AT THE SAME TIME not defying gravity!

    All funny business aside. Unless you get some sort of mechanical pod to work in (I'll pass on that by the way), sitting at that angle and *trying* to work with objects out of orientation is going to have an adverse effect on the body too. Some fo the funny posts above make some sense as you would need a massive KVM and a trackball to keep from hurting yuorself trying to work without a rotating cage around you!

  80. Re:Augment vs Human by gd2shoe · · Score: 1
    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  81. Subject by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    TFA is broken at the moment, but I'm willing to bet the reclined position is only "best" compared to the others in the study. I'm also willing to bet the best thing for your back is a variety of seated positions to help flex your spine and muscles, and not one stationary position for hours at a time.

  82. Is sitting worse than standing? by Leuf · · Score: 1

    Okay so we aren't designed to sit all day, but we are designed to stand up, aren't we? So how is sitting straight any different on your back than standing up? Whether the load stops at my butt or my feet shouldn't make any difference to my back.

    1. Re:Is sitting worse than standing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay so we aren't designed to sit all day, but we are designed to stand up, aren't we? So how is sitting straight any different on your back than standing up? Whether the load stops at my butt or my feet shouldn't make any difference to my back.

      When you stand up, your back forms an S-shape, which is its natural position. When you sit down at 90 degrees, your back is straightened out, which puts strain on the discs in your back by compressing them on one side.

  83. F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    In other words, can you please do a study confirming (to my employer, of course) that this 135 degree reclined position does not adversely affect my the bloodflow to the brain, attention span, ability to perform complex mental tasks, etc?

    F-16 fighter seats are in a permanent reclining position. I think the Air Force is happy with the performance in the listed categories.

    1. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's made that way so that you don't accidentally break your spine when you're maneuvering at 6Gs.

    2. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      It's made that way so that you don't accidentally break your spine when you're maneuvering at 6Gs.

      I'm not sure if the orientation helps the spine, but I'm pretty sure it helps keep blood from moving from your brain to your feet.

    3. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Most of us aren't pulling 9G's at our desks and squeezing our butt cheeks together so hard they hurt to keep blood in our heads.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    4. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Most of us aren't pulling 9G's at our desks and squeezing our butt cheeks together so hard they hurt to keep blood in our heads.

      Neither are F16 pilots 99.x% of the time.

    5. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Add the word "ever" to my comment then.

      Comparing an F-16 to a PC desk is still retarded, which was my point... obviously.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    6. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Comparing an F-16 to a PC desk is still retarded, which was my point... obviously.

      Not at all, the topic is working in a reclined position. Desks and F16s are equivalent *most* of the time, well except for some vibration. F16s spend a lot of time in straight and level flight, 1G in the "normal" direction, where the pilots has many tasks to perform. Your fixation on the very rare combat maneuvering causes you to overlook the obvious.

    7. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not overlooking the obvious. The reclined position was created to handle the G loading of combat maneuvers, not to give the pilot any benefits at 1G. In fact, much of the panel is covered by your knees sticking up into your field of view in the F-16, and you learn to bob your head and look around your knees a lot.

      If there is a benefit at 1G, it was not planned, and was a less-than-secondary consideration, considering you can't even see the entire instrument panel through your knees in an F-16. If there is any other benefit to reclining the pilot that far in 1G flight in the F-16, it has not been studied, but it's doubtful anyone cares when the above knee-bobbing is required for being able to see certain instruments.

      Part of the purpose of reclining the F-16 so far back is also rumored to have been to save costs and reduce aerodynamic loads on the canopy, as the canopy itself would have to be taller if the F-16 pilot sat in a more upright position in the cockpit.

      The F-16's seatback recline angle is higher than all the other fighter aircraft in the current U.S. aresenal.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    8. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not overlooking the obvious. The reclined position was created to handle the G loading of combat maneuvers, not to give the pilot any benefits at 1G.

      Irrelevant. The seat is fixed in its reclining position so the pilot's 1G work environment is reclined. This offers evidence that mental abilities are not destroyed by a reclined environment, which was the point in question. Perhaps you should read the top of the thread to understand the context of the F16 reference, you are off topic.

    9. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Well the guy stated that the Air Force is happy with the performance of pilots in the F-16 and tried to relate that to the performance of some fat-ass office-worker at a desk.

      Even if a reclined position caused a loss of performance, the guys flying the jets are in shape, tested, and trained a hell of a lot more than any desk-potato to do what they're doing, so I'd guess the damn chair is completely irrelevant.

      The boys in the fighter jets would perform as well inverted (which they do) as right side up.

      Completely stupid to compare a machine operating in three dimensions at close to or over the speed of sound to some moron sitting there munching on cheetos in the same position for hours and hours with no more physical exertion than moving a mouse arm.

      Far too many factors involved beyond the chair. But this is Slashdot where all the wanna-be Top Gun arm-chair coders fantasize about how their 135 degree reclined computer chair somehow makes them somehow equivalent to someone who actually goes outside, sets goals, meets them, and gets handed the keys (figuratively) to go fly an F-16 for a living.

      Equating sitting in an office chair to flying an F-16 is supremely dumb and has no basis in engineering beyond a casual relationship, but then again... it's Slashdot. Finding a real Engineer here might be hard, too.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    10. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Well the guy stated that the Air Force is happy with the performance of pilots in the F-16 and tried to relate that to the performance of some fat-ass office-worker at a desk.

      Did you read the following in my last post? "The seat is fixed in its reclining position so the pilot's 1G work environment is reclined. This offers evidence that mental abilities are not destroyed by a reclined environment, which was the point in question."

      Also, I was the "guy". Since you apparently failed to research the context, here is the original question and follow-up: "In other words, can you please do a study confirming (to my employer, of course) that this 135 degree reclined position does not adversely affect my the bloodflow to the brain, attention span, ability to perform complex mental tasks, etc? F-16 fighter seats are in a permanent reclining position. I think the Air Force is happy with the performance in the listed categories." Now reclined pilots engage in complex mental tasks while calmly cruising in a 1G environment, navigation for example. They also need the ability to pay attention and to have situation awareness, flying in formation for instance, navigation again, scanning for hazards and threats, ... F-16 pilots exists in both 1G and high-G environments, however what happens at high-G is irrelevant. That the seat is reclined due to high-G endurance is irrelevant, the seat is fixed and the 1G environment is reclined. Hence the appropriateness for the comparison to be being reclined at a desk and needing to maintain mental activity.

      Regarding the rest of your comments. Dude you are clueless, you have watched way too much TV and movies. Pilots are not the supermen you believe, they are merely well conditioned and trained to briefly perform in extreme environments. They can not perform as well inverted (or more accurate a negative G environment since up/down has no meaning with respect to the forces trying to kill the pilot) pilots mere perform adequately under negative Gs for a very brief time frame, lookup redout. Hence the tendency toward an inside loop rather than an outside loop.

    11. Re:F-16 seats are reclining ... by NateTech · · Score: 1

      I am a pilot. And I'm having fun stringing you along. You're quiet hyper about this.

      A reclined chair (or not) makes no damn difference in the performance of a normal human.

      In a high-performance aircraft, they're installed to help the pilot handle G-loads.

      Keep talking, we're having fun aren't we?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  84. Rickover was right, lives were on the line ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    It's likely that 50 years ago (during the cold war) there weren't many Soviet admirals walzting around the Nautilus. So we can assume he was doing this to fellow officers only.

    Junior officers would be more accurate.

    That said, what an ass.

    Not really. Virtually all first generation "nuclear Navy" officers were personally selected by Rickover. His interviews were grueling, but he recognized how high the stakes were. Ignore all the normal Naval hazards where an officer has to make on-the-spot decisions with incomplete information. Now let increase the hazards by an order of magnitude or two since we will be dealing with a submarine force. Now lets up the cost of inadequate maintenance or training, human error, mechanical error, etc since a "bad day at the office" may result in a radiation leak rather than an oil slick. Creating physical and psychological stress during an interview or test is an important tool. It is also pretty standard training. It is not all that different from testing a crewman's ability to find and fix a leaky pipe by flooding the room to chest level with cold water, turning out the light, and have high pressure water spraying from various directions.

  85. Good to know... by Genocaust · · Score: 1

    That I'm well ahead of the power curve on this. I spend most of my workday laid back just because I can :).

    --
    It could be that the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others.
  86. not created to sit down for long hours by Memroid · · Score: 1
    "'We were not created to sit down for long hours, but somehow modern life requires..."
    Umm... Just what were we CREATED to do?
  87. I'm safe since by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

    I don't maintain stable positions.135 degree looks confortable,but you have to move forward your neck.Sitting in one pose btw,even its super relaxed more then hour =muscle pain.Walkign around helps.

  88. In Soviet Russia by somersault · · Score: 1

    you seat waiter!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  89. Send pics (nT) by Dennis_123 · · Score: 1

    Send pics (nT)

  90. Ha ha I was slouching as I read that.... by bodland · · Score: 1

    So I tipped back in my chair and put my feet on the desk. Now all I have to do is convince the ergo department to tell my boss it is okay.

  91. got a picture? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    got a picture?

    I read that twice... and just don't get it. But it sounds very useful, I've had chronic back problems since May.

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  92. Thanks! by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Thanks, it did!

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  93. OT Re:Finally by sandmaninator · · Score: 1

    Nice bike. I road a century over the summer on a diamond frame and had severe neck pain for the next week and a half. Never again! Now I have to decide between a regular 'bent and a fully faired machine capable of getting over 50 Mph. That would be cool! ...but maybe impractical for my daily commute.

  94. Posture by crashthecat · · Score: 1

    Interesting...I always slouch and have been told many times to sit up straight or I will have a bad back...I have never had any back problems, but many of the people that have told me to sit up seem to have back problems or some sort or another, even those who are younger. I always told them that slouching feels more natural to the body, and also that sitting up straight tends to put excess pressure on the lower spine and causes compression which over time may cause back problems. Anyways, its my 2 cents.