Slashdot Mirror


Personality Secrets in Your MP3 Player

Jeremy Dean writes "Once past saying 'hello' and 'how are you?' to someone you've just met, what is next? How do we make friends and get to know other people? Psychologists have talked about the importance of body language, physical appearance and clothing but they've not been so keen on what we actually talk about. A recent study put participants in same-sex and opposite-sex pairings and told them to get to know each other over 6 weeks (Rentfrow & Gosling, 2006). Analysing the results, they found the most popular topic of conversation was music. What is it about music that's so useful when we first meet someone and what kind of information can we extract from the music another person likes? "

326 comments

  1. Likes country: emotionally stable by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Likes country: emotionally stable
    In the U.K., maybe. Try doing the same survey in Oklahoma. Or, the local truck stop.
    1. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by nova20 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Usually, I find that "likes country" means "is a redneck, and proud of it".

    2. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by justkarl · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Emotionally Stable" != "Not a wierd redneck".

      And certainly,

      Likes Country Music != Someone I want to hang out with

    3. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like BOTH kinds of music. Country AND western...

    4. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by Bassman59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Country: the music of tolerance.

    5. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by DJ_Adequate · · Score: 1

      I'm emotionally stable. I crazy all the freaking time. Stable doesn't mean good, just consistent.

    6. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Country: the music of tolerance.
      Doubtful at best, my friend.
    7. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by ifly420 · · Score: 1

      Apparently someone is... There's an online music preference questionnaire that provides feedback about our your personality: http://www.outofservice.com/music-personality-test /

    8. Re:Likes country: emotionally stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy sh*t that's wrong.

  2. Me too! by otacon · · Score: 1

    I know thats one of the first things I ask when I meet new people...unless it's a work environment...but 9/10 when I ask I am greeted with a response that makes me say "eeewww" to myself...and then when I have to explain the kind of music I like I usually have trouble relating that to them...but you can usually tell who you can avoid by their (usually horrible) taste in music.

    --
    In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
    1. Re:Me too! by Eivind · · Score: 1
      Okay ! What do you think about someone who likes (among a zillion other things);
      • Bertine Zetlitz
      • Nigthwish
      • Weird Al (atleast when I'm in a quirky mood)
      • Fabel
      • Die Puhdies

      I am always at a loss what to answer when people ask what *type* of music I like. Let's see, Bertine is modern pop with a fair add-in of jazz and some elements from rock. Strong vocals, complex sound-picture, not depressive, but certainly not jolly either.

      Nigthwish, hmm, hard-rock combined with vocals out of classical opera. It's not that rare now which odd combos like that, but the first time I heard them it was very new to me anyway, besides, they're good at it. Their concert in Dresden autumn 2005 was one of the best I've ever been to. Totally rocked.

      Weird al ? Political satire and/or parody, often with well-known pop-songs as sound-stage. Funny, the *musical* value is near zero.

      Fabel ? Norwegian band. Extraordinary texts. The kind you could read as poetry, without getting laughed out. Yet, talking of situations, emotions and problems normal people can relate to. The kind of thing that should make you all wanna go learn norwegian *grin*. Very very varied in mood.

      Die Puhdies ? East-german rock-band. Not very heavy, more melodic. Kinda stuff that you tend to sing along to when you've had a few glasses too much. Musically it's not revolutionary, it's just good-mood kinda music.

      If I'd mention more, they'd stay all over the spectrum, so I honestly don't know what I like. I know what I *don't* like though.

    2. Re:Me too! by Cruise_WD · · Score: 1

      I'd say you sound like me :P

      Nightwish and Weird Al are two of my favourites, and from the descriptions I reckon I'd like the other three too.
      Among my favourites I also include Enya, Dire Straits, The Tea Party, 8stops7, Susanne Vega. My favourite genre is country (which gets me some very odd stares here in England), but my favourite piece of music is Terra's Theme from Final Fantasy 4.

      I just like /music/. What type of music depends on my mood at the time.

      --
      [ cruise / casual-tempest.net / xenogamous.com / transference.org / quantam sufficit ]
    3. Re:Me too! by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Not Time's Scar from Chrono Chross -- surely ? I still get shivers down my back at that spot you know. Had it in my wedding even. Does that qualify me as among the Luckiest Guys Alive, to have a wife like that I mean ?

  3. Because... by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...music is supposed toc ome from the artists soul. Music explains an artists point of view on subjects.

    If you and I like the same artists, chances are relatively high we hold the same views.

    Not to mention when I'm blasting Emperor or Dimmu Borgir or Dying Fetus, you won't ask me to put on some Kenny G.

    1. Re:Because... by shotgunsaint · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, but I may ask for some Dave Brubeck, or mayhaps the Berzerker. Anyone trying to analyze my personality through my music tastes could only come to two conclusions: Schizophrenic or Elitist Snob. I'm not sure whether either of them are wrong :)

      --
      The future isn't here until I can type "car keys" into Google and have it say "You left them in your pants last night."
    2. Re:Because... by Fyre2012 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sing from your fucking heart!!
      I want my rockstars dead!!
      Bill Hicks says it best =)

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    3. Re:Because... by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone trying to analyze my personality through my music tastes could only come to two conclusions: Schizophrenic or Elitist Snob. I'm not sure whether either of them are wrong :)
      EXACTLY. See, I may be into extreme metal, but I will never say I don't like something because it "isn't metal enough" However, I have met NUMEROUS people who would make that exact statement. It's not just the artists that I am interested in that others should be concerned with in terms of figuring out what kind of person I am...it should be how I react to the artists that YOU are into as well. Many people forget that I can learn more about them by judging their reaction to MY interests, rather than them TELLING me about theirs.
    4. Re:Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ..music is supposed toc ome from the artists soul. Music explains an artists point of view on subjects.



      Wow have you ever bought a bill of goods.

    5. Re:Because... by qwijibo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Haven't you considered the possibility that a large number of people can really relate to corporate shill sellouts because they would like to one day be a corporate shill sellout themselves? American Idol shows us how many people there are who are completely out of touch with reality and would give anything for the dream of one day being a sellout.

    6. Re:Because... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Quite right.

      Mathematics is the universal language. Music expreses that, and also the language of the soul, so it has the best of both worlds.

      --
      Computer & Music Joke: Rember, C# is still a Db.

    7. Re:Because... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      See, this is where we learn about people.

      Your response implies I am referring to corporate acts who have their lyrics and music written for them. These are not artists, they are performers.

      Now, there is nothing wrong with that. They do what their abilities grant them to do.

      However. My point here is that considering that your initial reaction was to assume that I am a "sheep" following whatever happens in the mainstream just goes to show how unbelievably shallow you are.

      There are musicians that write their own lyrics and music that you don't hear on the radio or see on TV, you know...did it ever cross your mind that maybe possibly I was referring to one of THOSE people?

      Elvis was a performer. George Evelyn is an artist and musician.

      See the difference?

    8. Re:Because... by Gigaflynn · · Score: 1

      bullshit, the music industry all about putting out the same reconstituted pop crap to make money

      --
      "Neo, follow the white rabbit"
      "Can i eat the white rabbit?"
      "No, there is no spoon to eat it with"
    9. Re:Because... by Pojut · · Score: 1

      For the mainstream, yes.

      There is a MASSIVE number of musicians and artists that don't give a fuck about money.

      And for the record, having your shit on the radio does not mean you have "sold out". Changing your music and lyrics and allowing a COMPANY to own them means you have sold out.

    10. Re:Because... by nuclearspike · · Score: 1

      last.fm is a great way to test this out. I find (virtually) all my new music through this site. My "neighbors" that it finds can have wide and varied tastes as well, but even though the genres are different from each other (and not simply "find more artists like this one") there's something underlying the connections between the music that is not immediately apparent. I love browsing my "neighbors" music tastes and seeing "got it, got it, got it, who? (goes to alltunes, previews, loves it, then downloads), got it, got it, got it, got it, who?, got it, got it.."

      It makes me very curious to talk with some of them. If someone generally likes all the same artists that you do (especially ones that are not on the radio) would it mean that you would get along well with them? If our music is more chill, sentimental, melodic, lyrical with occasional trance and techno... would the "rhythm" of our personalities match pretty well?

      It's not that I don't get alone with people who are on the opposite ends of the music spectrum, but I've found that the people I'm most compatible with having deeper conversations with and find each others' "flow" really enjoy the music I expose them to, have already heard it, or have stuff that I really appreciate. It's not a prereq, but it definitely has not gone unnoticed.

    11. Re:Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you like some making fuck?

    12. Re:Because... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Do you ever worry about what might happen if you find out that 30% of the people that like all the same music as you are child molestors?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    13. Re:Because... by nuclearspike · · Score: 1

      Well, I would if I had the Barney And Friends Do Dallas soundtrack.

  4. It's easier than thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's much easier to say you like some crappy indie band in order to get inside a girl's pants.

    1. Re:It's easier than thinking by Monsuco · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's much easier to say you like some crappy indie band in order to get inside a girl's pants.
      Yep, she likes the indie music, I like whats indie pants.
    2. Re:It's easier than thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need that kind of an excuse for cross-dressing?

    3. Re:It's easier than thinking by hoover · · Score: 1

      what a fitting nick you have to make a statement like that ;-)

      Anyway, cheers, you owe me a new keyboard!

      --
      Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
    4. Re:It's easier than thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you "loosing" your rights on?

  5. I don't have any favourite music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I guess I am out of the dating game, then.

    Oh, well. More time for WoW.

  6. Fall out boy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know someone who finds the lyrics from fall out boy meaningful isnt someone i want to talk to.

    1. Re:Fall out boy by Skadet · · Score: 0

      I know someone who finds the lyrics from fall out boy meaningful isnt someone i want to talk to.

      They call kids like us vicious and carved out of stone
      But for what we've become, we just feel more alone
      Always weigh what I've got against what I left
      So progress report: I am missing you to death

      [Chorus: x2]
      Douse yourself in cheap perfume it's
      So fitting, so fitting of the way you are
      You can't cover it up
      Can't cover it up
    2. Re:Fall out boy by BarryJacobsen · · Score: 1

      While I may not particularly care for their style of music, Fall Out Boy has some pretty real and meaningful lyrics. Try looking on a website for the words, as I sure as heck can't understand them when he's singing them - but they're still very pretty.

  7. As yes, the notes of love.. by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just bought a new waterbed
    and it's made for me and you!

    Why don't, we get drunk, and screw...

  8. Squirt me three random songs! by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe Microsoft's Zune is onto something.

    New line in a bar on a Saturday night -

    "Squirt me three tunes, and I'll let you know if you can buy me a drink."

    --
    "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
    1. Re:Squirt me three random songs! by monoqlith · · Score: 4, Funny


      Not many use the word "squirt" in a bar without intending to follow it up with some form of fluid exchange. This can too often be misinterpreted as a bad pick-up line, and in some cases might actually get you tossed out of the bar like some kind of pariah.

      Not that, uh, I know about this, uh...first-hand....

      Shit.

    2. Re:Squirt me three random songs! by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      Correction: did I say 'misinterpreted?' I meant 'interpreted.'

    3. Re:Squirt me three random songs! by PoconoPCDoctor · · Score: 1

      True dat! Squirt has not yet passed into the lexicon, as Mr. Ballmer would hope. Until it does, maybe "what's your favorite distro?" might weed out the anti-techie types.

      --
      "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair" - George Washington
  9. Music is essentially universal by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Music us everywhere, for the big global bands and artists there is generally something to discuss.
    It breaks the ice.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Music is essentially universal by skoaldipper · · Score: 0

      Pain is universal too. And at my age, the ice breaker for me meeting new friends is, "So, who you seeing for your liver spots?". And, the article mentions the average age was 18 I believe.

      --
      I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  10. How much information? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None, generally. The only things I've ever been able to draw out regarding somebody's personality from their taste in music is broad stereotypes which are invariably discarded mere minutes later. Music, despite how much I hear about it from others, has always proved to be completely free of any real personal content.

    That does not mean it's useless, of course. Quite the opposite; it is a topic of conversation which is safe without always being boring, and provides a quick way to find superficial common ground with somebody. I don't get to talk to strangers much, but I am told that's how it's done.

  11. Music is "easy" by lonechicken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Once you get past the introductions and the "I like everything except rap/metal/country (choose your typical singled out genre)", there's still plenty to talk about. Songs in general have a good combination of easy to understand qualitative concepts that extend beyond "this is better than that" to discuss. There's also the element of, "Hey we both like this ___, have you tried listening to ___?" Movies are the same way (as shown in that poll), though I'm a little surprised music beat movies by that much.

    1. Re:Music is "easy" by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      Easily 4 out of 5 people I ask about music says, "Oh, I like just about everything" or the same thing, but with the "except rap/metal/country (select all that apply)." It's annoying and meaningless, yes. But a slight variation on asking people what sort of music they like that I find to be far more useful in getting a general feel for what the person is like and that is far more similar to this study is, "What are your favorite bands / musicians?" No matter how broad a person claims their tastes in music are, the first 3 - 5 names that they list will probably tell you more than all the rest of that topic of conversation, because people will say they like 'pretty much everything' even if they can count on one hand the artists from any given genre except for the 1 or 2 styles of music that will own those first 3 - 5 names they list.

      With nearly anybody you talk to about music, their taste in music rarely predicts their personality to any significant degree in a specific traits sense, I'll give you that, but I disagree that it is meaningless. The reason is that while I can think of lots of cases of people liking the same type of music but having wildly different personalities, I can generally predict if I will like them, on the whole, to a significant degree of accuracy based on their taste in music. As a general rule, if a person listens to mostly rap or mostly metal, I will not like them. As a general rule, if a person listens to mostly hard rock, mostly industrial, or mostly electronic, I will enjoy hanging out with them. Broad musical taste is a poor predictor overall. Core music favorites, however, while not the best predictor of specific aspects of personality, do seem to be pretty accurate at giving a sum-total 'am I likely to hang out with this person on purpose' score.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    2. Re:Music is "easy" by kthejoker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are a lot of reasons music is much better at judging than movies:

      1) Music comes in much smaller and more discrete bites, and therefore more can be judged faster.
      2) Music is easier to say "Yes" or "No" to. Most movies fall in grey areas, where you didn't like it, "but it had redeeming values" (or, corollary: it "wasn't perfect but it was still really good"). In short, people don't qualify their music tastes as much as their movie tastes.
      3) Music, because it is generally easier to create, as a whole has a much larger spectrum. So niches are easier to find (and accentuate.) Again, more music means more niches.
      4) And finally, music (again, because it's easier to create and has more niches) is more divided sociologically than movies are. When someone says, "I like country & western and I can't stand rap", they are making as much a statement about their sociological identity as they are about their music tastes. Someone who says "I like comedies, but I can't stand thrillers" isn't making the same kind of statement. And more to the point, there's nothing sociological that precludes someone from enjoying Pirates of the Caribbean or Superman Returns. For music, that's a lot less true.

      In short, cinema as a whole must cater to drawing in as many fans as possible. Music simply doesn't need to cater to the whole, because the niche in and of itself can sustain music. Movies are "for the masses"; but if you don't like one thing of music, you can just try another.

    3. Re:Music is "easy" by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Music is more abstract and less "preachy". Liking even popular/critically acclaimed movies like The Godfather/LotR/Shawshank Redeption (top 3 on imdb.com) will get you in trouble with the wrong person in a way liking the Beatles/Zeppelin/Rolling Stones doesn't.

      Not that I believe that music is contentless, I think there's just more people "who likes our pretty songs and...likes to sing along...but...don't know what it means" (to quote Nirvana, whose legions of fans are most ironically in this catagory) than people who "get it".

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    4. Re:Music is "easy" by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Then you have people like myself who listen to music, but don't remember artist names or song titles... Or movies I liked... Hmm... It's weird I have a girlfriend and we talk about all sorts of things, but music and movies are the least talked about things (unless we have just watched a movie or just heard a song one of us likes)...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    5. Re:Music is "easy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Music is a chiche, like sports and the weather.

      The difference is, 1)music is interesting(unlike the weather) and 2)women will talk about it(unlike sports).

      Cliches allow communication without revealing any personal details, such as political/philosophical ideals/beliefs and emotions; all of which can end a potential relationship before it starts. Hence the reason they are "safe".

    6. Re:Music is "easy" by meme_police · · Score: 1

      My main reason for using music to judge compatability, and it's mostly related to your number 3, is to gauge adventurousness of the other person. If their iPod is full of only top 40 stuff they probably eat at chain restaurants, see only top 5 movies, never explore beyond their city limits, and never try any new experiences.

      --

      The meme police, They live inside of my head

    7. Re:Music is "easy" by Nanpa · · Score: 1

      What? Are you saying Polly isn't about a cute little bird?

    8. Re:Music is "easy" by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're annoying.

      Oops, didn't mean to type that. What I meant to say was, I quit asking people about music entirely because I find the answers aren't terribly useful. Either I get really pretentious non-musician answers, or really pretentious musician answers. I'm sorry, but I don't really think describing the Sex Pistols as "complex guitar riffs" is going to cut it. That's grade school guitar, isn't it? (Yes, it is!) So for non-pretentious musical discussion, there's non-musicians who, in my experience anyway, don't know enough to talk and therefore *don't* (because they're not pretentious!), and there's musicians who, in my experience anyway, know enough to know that they shouldn't really talk much unless they know a lot about the music they're talking about. Since, in nearly 25 years of playing music of various types on various interests, the one thing I've learned is that I don't know enough music in-depth to guarantee a conversation with any musician on the subject, conversations about music just aren't happening with me. Either you're pretentious, in which case I don't want to talk to you at all, or you're not, in which case you either don't know what you're talking about or the chances we know the same music and can therefore talk about it are very slim.

      Even among metalhead guitar players (which I am), I find the opportunities to do more than just say which bands I like and hear which bands you like don't come very often. I do find bass players generally have more to talk about, but I think that's because bass isn't as specialized as metalhead guitar (and also I'm not specialized in any genre in bass, I just lean toward jazz and prefer to avoid any labeling beyond that).

      Anyway, I find the most important predictor of whether or not someone will annoy me has more to do with the whiny line. If the music is whiny more than 30% of the time, the person who listens to it as his core choices will annoy me. As the whininess decreases, I like the person more, and more, and more, until I'm exuding infinite love for 0% whiny core music choices.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Music is "easy" by Odin_Tiger · · Score: 1

      Do you realize how pretentious and, well, annoying you came off as? At any rate...do you refuse to discuss any subject unless both you and the other person are experts on the technical aspects? No talking about how cool that new Mustang is unless you're a mechanical engineer talking to a mechanical engineer? No mentioning how funny (or not) the latest Will Ferrel flick is, unless you both have film degrees? If that's the case, I guess you probably don't talk to many people or about many things, which would explain the pretentious and insular view of the world you show. Or were you just trolling because I took a jab at your choice of musical style? The funny thing is, the first 2 paragraphs of your post are completely unrelated to mine even though you come across like you're arguing, and then in the last two sentences you come back and more or less agree with me anyways in saying that core taste in music can be a fair predictor of how well you will get along with a person.

      --
      Unpleasantries.
    10. Re:Music is "easy" by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      Heh. No, I don't require expertise on both sides before talking. I just require a common frame of reference. My point was that is harder to find for people who've studied a field as wide as music in any kind of depth. And I was trying to illustrate how that common frame of reference almost never shows itself to me.

      Oh well. Probably most posts in this topic are going to come off as pretentious anyway. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  12. Uh oh... by Kengou · · Score: 0

    I don't really listen to music. Does that mean I have no personality?

    --
    Emu Anyone?
    1. Re:Uh oh... by LifeWithJustin · · Score: 1

      I also do not listen to a lot of music. In fact hold on... let me check my XM... hmm... 140... I guess I'm listening to ESPN Radio. But that is music to my ears.

    2. Re:Uh oh... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      no, it just means you don't have a soul. i can only conjecture that you must be a robot.

  13. Great idea for next /. poll by ciaohound · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Once past saying 'hello' and 'how are you?' to someone you've just met, what is next?"

    * Retreat back to cube and resume coding
    * Avoid eye contact and hope someone else comes along to relieve you from having to make conversation
    * Launch into a rant
    * "I don't have friends/conversations/etc, you insensitive clod!"
    * Generic Cowboy Neal reference

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:Great idea for next /. poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pull out the marriage bag like Borat.

    2. Re:Great idea for next /. poll by Clazzy · · Score: 1

      You need a dupe option, so say "hello" and "how are you?" a second time.

      --
      If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards... Checkmate.
    3. Re:Great idea for next /. poll by slasho81 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      * Launch into a rant

      I know you were joking, but ranting is a pretty good bonding strategy. Disliking the same things is a much better ground for friendship than liking the same things. NYT, PDF paper, Wikipedia

    4. Re:Great idea for next /. poll by MikeTheMan · · Score: 2, Insightful
  14. Oh yeah, I can see the conversation... by VE3OGG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Guy:Hey
    Girl:Hey

    Guy:Hey, I've got a nano!
    Girl:I have to go... and... wash my hair...

    1. Re:Oh yeah, I can see the conversation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not the size of the iPod, it's how you use it.

    2. Re:Oh yeah, I can see the conversation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only having 20 hours of music isn't always enough to satisfy some people, sometimes it takes a whole weekend, and then sometimes you have to call off monday.

    3. Re:Oh yeah, I can see the conversation... by Kaitnieks · · Score: 1

      Oh, but can your nano squirt?

  15. Random sample by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this a random sample across all demographics and locations? I bet it isn't. It's probably one of those social science experiments where they draw sweeping conclusions about the whole of humanity by interviewing 30 college students.

    Or am I too cynical?

    1. Re:Random sample by pubjames · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ha! I was right - just checked the paper, it was with 60 undergraduate students. Apparently the other topics of conversation were:

      1) How drunk you got last night.
      2) Which lecturer you hate the most.
      3) Have you written that stupid paper yet.
      4) Are you going to the club tonight.

    2. Re:Random sample by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's what drives me crazy about all the so-called "studies" posted here. There's a reason you won't see anything about this anywhere else: this is not a real study, it's an opinion piece with targeted results masquerading as "proof". Lame-o.

      --
      why? forty-two.
    3. Re:Random sample by govtpiggy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the article might hold some clue? If you missed the link in the summary here it is again.

      http://www.spring.org.uk/2007/02/personality-secre ts-in-your-mp3-player.php

      --
      do you know squarepusher?
    4. Re:Random sample by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      No, you're about right. I've never ever made contact by talking about music to a girl. While pretty much anything else (apart from computing) would do. The idea never crossed my mind. The reverse has happened to me a couple times though. Each time it was pretty much the only topic where she could find words with more than two syllables.

      IMO you don't want to start off by talking about music. Unless you want to sound like a retard.

      (disclaimer, I'm in Paris, YMMV depending on your local cultural conventions)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:Random sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something they teach in any of the Behavioral sciences, especially in behavioral statistics and research methods, is that you can't test the whole population because its not possible.

      I looked over the article as well and the demographics were fairly spread out for what is likely in that part of Texas.
      The sampling was most likely random within the population they sampled which was Undergraduate psychology students. Yes, you can say that it wasn't truely random and broad enough to cover every demographic possible, but researchers have to work with what they have.

      Either way, you can't discount what was discovered simply because it only involved undergrad students (which is how you came off to me). The next likely step they could make would be to survey an older demographic to see what other cnversation topics older folks use and if the results hold true in that demographic as well.

      One last point as well. Even with a small sample, researchers are capable of making accurate conclusions as long as the sample isn't biased--thanks to statistics.

  16. Sounds about right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm the new hire at work, found out our webdesigner makes her own techno and does some DJ work, and struck up a conversation on that. Then she got me addicted to WoW and won't start a new character. :(

    1. Re:Sounds about right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch out for that WoW shit...It's more addictive than crack. Seriously, as a warning to all you non-WoW'ers: don't start. Ever. It'll ruin your life.

  17. The Zune by jcarkeys · · Score: 1

    Conclusive proof that the Zune helps people socialize. Microsoft needs to start advertising that!

  18. High Fidelity by Nasarius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "What really matters is what you like, not what you are like. Books, records, films -- these things matter."

    --
    LOAD "SIG",8,1
    1. Re:High Fidelity by justkarl · · Score: 1

      One of my favorite movies..Better yet,

      "Was I listening to pop music because I was depressed, or was i depressed because I was listening to pop music?"

  19. I don't think there's anything profound here. by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Music just has the right characteristics to be a good conversation topic.

    Unless your a farmer or a meteorologist, you can't talk for more than a few seconds about the weather.

    Sex, politics, and religion are way too dangerous.

    But there is a lot of music, there is a lot to talk about, the chances are that two people selected at random know a lot more of the same music than the same books, the same movies, etc.

    You can care enough about music to have a spirited, passionate discussion about it, but few people care so much about it that disagreements could lead to violence, or even to the breakup of a budding friendship.

    If you take someone home to meet your parents, you don't need to worry about whether that person's taste in music will match your parents or not.

    1. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by lonechicken · · Score: 1

      Sex, politics, and religion are way too dangerous. "As long as there's, you know, sex and drugs, I can do without the rock and roll."
      -Mick Shrimpton
    2. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by ab0mb88 · · Score: 1

      You are looking at these conversations from too simple of an angle. A conversation that only lasts a few minutes about music is almost guaranteed to give some insight into your views and attitudes towards sex, politics, and religion. Most music will have some lean on one of these topics so if you discuss music for very long you should get some idea where someone stands on at least one of these issues, and if everything they like is free of any discussion of all of these basic aspects of life that says something about them as well.

    3. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Funny

      Music just has the right characteristics to be a good conversation topic.

      I strongly disagree. Music is often thought to be good conversation topic and a good meter for determining what type of personality someone has. 90% of the time actually starting such a conversation, however, results in canned responses based upon what social circle the person is in and what they think is "cool." Most younger people especially tend to listen to music to make a statement, rather than to reflect their real tastes. The average conversation about music goes something like this:

      So, what kind of music do you like?

      Umm, you know, indy music, like [pop_band_x] or [pop_band_y]

      Really, huh those are okay, have you heard [band_z]

      Umm, no, are they good?

      ...

      Such conversation is dreadful and useless. If you want to get to know someone and make an impression, you need to be a bit more interesting yourself. I like to start conversations with something spontaneous, like, "hi you don't know me but I think you're really sexy. Can you think of any circumstance under which you'd murder someone?" Or start off by breaking them out of the conversational mold. I met some really interesting people by introducing them to my friends like, "hey everybody, this is my old friend Veronica, she once punched a homeless guy who said her shoes were ugly." If the random girl I'm referring to as "Veronica" is an interesting person, she'll almost always run with it and I met someone fun. If not, she runs for the door or her boyfriend and I haven't wasted 5 minutes repeating the same boring conversation about music.

      My advice to everyone is to ignore the topic of music and develop some character. Be confident and interesting and you don't have to worry about picking "safe" topics to meet people.

    4. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My advice to everyone is to ignore the topic of music and develop some character. Be confident and interesting and you don't have to worry about picking "safe" topics to meet people.

      Amen to that. I only started making friends in any number when I stopped caring so much about whether I made them, whether I impressed people, what they thought of me, etc. Just hang around with people who make you feel better than you otherwise do, and avoid people who make you feel worse, while being yourself. That's the bottom line. Just let yourself be who you are, and then hang out with the people who make you feel good about being who you are. It doesn't mean there's no room for self-improvement; most of us don't feel good when people lie to us for example.

      And if you do, then I'll hopefully detect that, and stay the fuck away from you :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by munrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Music is missing a very important characteristic, and that's presence.

      When you're standing at the bus stop, you'll talk to the old lady waiting for the 86 about the weather, because it's there, or about the horrendous state of transport in your area, because it's immediate and common to you both. Unless there's a radio playing, you're not going to talk about music. If there is a radio playing, the best you can expect is "Turn that shit down."

      In fact if you're standing at the bus stop listening to your MP3 player, having the earbuds/headphones on means "Do not disturb" to anyone who isn't socially maladjusted.

    6. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Larry+Lightbulb · · Score: 1

      Unless your a farmer or a meteorologist, you can't talk for more than a few seconds about the weather.
      You're not English, are you.

    7. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by danpsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      I met some really interesting people by introducing them to my friends like, "hey everybody, this is my old friend Veronica, she once punched a homeless guy who said her shoes were ugly." If the random girl I'm referring to as "Veronica" is an interesting person, she'll almost always run with it and I met someone fun. If not, she runs for the door or her boyfriend and I haven't wasted 5 minutes repeating the same boring conversation about music.

      Ah, a man after my own. I wanna start up a surrealist greeting card company where nobody knows what the hell the jokes are about.

      outside: "You know what the best part about getting older is?"

      inside: "Crackers...Happy birthday!"

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    8. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to start conversations with something spontaneous, like, "hi you don't know me but I think you're really sexy. Can you think of any circumstance under which you'd murder someone?"
      This is the creepiest fucking thing I've read.

      ENJOY YOUR eRESTRAINING ORDER
    9. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by ni42 · · Score: 1

      Music is often thought to be good conversation topic and a good meter for determining what type of personality someone has. 90% of the time actually starting such a conversation, however, results in canned responses based upon what social circle the person is in and what they think is "cool."

      Especially "I like everything except country and rap." (Argh!) Then again, that response is more characteristic of certain demographics than others. A lot of small talk is about classification: how old you are, where you're from, what do you do for a living (or what your major is in school), what your hobbies are, exactly which distribution of Linux you use, that sort of thing. It serves a purpose. Sometimes a boring purpose, but it's a start.

      I think music *could* be a good conversation topic (besides canned responses that indicate social circle) because it's personal without being threatening. It can be used to see what a person thinks about various things because lyrics bring up the subject matter... but you don't have to tip your own hand, leave yourself vulnerable by diving right in with your own opinions, because you're not the one who wrote the lyrics. But then, personally I like to feel people out before opening up too much. Is this how people usually discuss music? Probably not.

      Personally, I like your approach. A lot of people say they hate small talk, but it is an effective tool for some goals. Categorizing someone can give you an idea of what to expect. (For example, if I found out someone was a Slashdot reader, I would except them to be in the category of people who say, "But I [insert list of eccentric characteristics]; I don't fit into a category!") And silence can be threatening, so generic topics are a way to be friendly. But there's more than one way to initiate interactions. If your goal is to have an interesting conversation and not a predictable one (gasp, what a concept), that murder comment's great. ;)

    10. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by pNutz · · Score: 1

      Guy: Raining then?
      Gal: Looks it.
      Guy: Right. Rather gray, eh? Bit chilly as well?
      Gal: Yes. Excuse me.

      --
      Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
    11. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact if you're standing at the bus stop listening to your MP3 player, having the earbuds/headphones on means "Do not disturb" to anyone who isn't socially maladjusted.
      Hmm that's weird. Every time I see headphones(especially white ones *drool*) I think "There's at least $100 at the end of that cord." Jackpot!
    12. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      Religion is too dangerous? If there is any topic that will determine if two persons's world-views line up, it likely has to do with their opinions on religion. If you're looking to get laid, religion is dangerous; if you're looking to get to know someone, it's essential.

    13. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      ...having the earbuds/headphones on means "Do not disturb" to anyone who isn't socially maladjusted.

      ...like my co-workers, for instance.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    14. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your a farmer or a meteorologist, you can't talk for more than a few seconds about the weather.
      Go talk to a farmer sometime.

      They're part botanist, business man, meteorologist, economist, mechanic, forest ranger, and they wear a stack of other hats as well.

      Farmers are not usually 'rich' in the conventional sense, but i've met independant (ie not corporate) farmers with annual budgets in the 8-figure range. Yea, $20+ million in seeds, labor, insurance, maintanence, etc.

      Farmers have to worry about local/domestic/international politics, currency markets, weather, the economy, etc etc etc. They're not as ignorant as you'd suspect.
    15. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So obviously you're not a match with that person
      move on to someone with a better answer

    16. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

      I don't know what made you think that I think farmers are ignorant. They are everything you say... and according to Wendell Berry, every study that has ever been done has shown that small family farms are more efficient producers than large agribusiness enterprises.

      The size of the investments that even a small farmer needs to make, and the relative thinness and unpredictability of the profit margin, are daunting.

    17. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by definate · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I am much the same, confident and spontaneous.

      However I'm 6ft 5in and if I'm introducing myself to a group of smaller people (usually a group of girls) I go with the old:
      "Hi! *Put hand out to shake hands in a conventional manner* I'm big."
      It also has a hint of suggestiveness!

      Or something like "Hey, this guy said your mothers a fucking crack whore!" at which point my friend plays along, the other guy gets defensive, but then we show him that it's all a joke.

      Or quote a reference (it's the nerd thing to do) to shows that you like, such as: *casually say* "Hey, ever had a fat man in a trench coat lick your ass hole?" (I don't have a trench coat but that would make this one all the better)

      Or the old overly cliche "Hey, my name is I enjoy water sports, long walks by the beach and reading a good book in a candle light bath. How about you?" this has two good outcomes, they just play along, or they question "water sports" as to what kind of water sports? (alluding to the sexual term... luckily I've never come across someone later who wanted "to piss"/"be pissed on")

      Oh well. That's my $0.002 or 0.002 cents, since they are the same.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    18. Re:I don't think there's anything profound here. by mutterc · · Score: 1

      Unless your a farmer or a meteorologist, you can't talk for more than a few seconds about the weather.

      Everybody talks about the weather, but nobody does anything about it.

  20. Ugh. by swid27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, that's probably (another) reason that I manage to have a hard time creating memorable "hooks" with other people; I have practically no interest in keeping up with or finding new music. (It isn't that I don't enjoy nearly all forms of music, mind you, it's just that, for me, there's approximately zero value in seeking out new things to listen to.)

    On a related note, the common geek tendency to disparage everyone who doesn't have the same eXtreMely obscure/not-yet-trendy/running counter to current popular opinion taste in music as he/she does is very lamentable. Seriously, most people don't use their taste in music to define themselves, so judging people on that is very narrow-minded.

    1. Re:Ugh. by Skadet · · Score: 1

      On a related note, the common geek tendency to disparage everyone who doesn't have the same eXtreMely obscure/not-yet-trendy/running counter to current popular opinion taste in music as he/she does is very lamentable. Seriously, most people don't use their taste in music to define themselves, so judging people on that is very narrow-minded.
      Agreed. This is why ask questions about likes: "So, what do you think of Brand New's new album?" or, "Are you a fan of Fall Out Boy?". Sometimes I'll work in a band reference and see if they pick up on it. Like recently while watching a friend of a friend play WoW, after he died and rez'd in the graveyard, "Hmm, so what's it feel like to be a ghost?" -- he gave me a blank stare.

      Sometimes I'll just play music I like in my office and see who says they like it. At my previous job, there was a gal there who didn't listen to the same stuff as me -- I couldn't name a single band I liked that she had heard of, short of the classics (Tom Petty, CSN&Y, etc). So, I made her a mix CD after she asked to hear some of the stuff I liked. She turned out to be one of my best friends at that job, and we still stay in touch.
    2. Re:Ugh. by Meatloaf+Surprise · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously, most people don't use their taste in music to define themselves, so judging people on that is very narrow-minded.

      I don't think it is that narrow minded to judge someone based on the type of music they listen to. For instance, someone with a taste in, say, pop and rap is probably someone who follows the popular trend and cannot think for themselves. However, someone with a more obscure taste in music is someone who would rather be unique and not follow the group, so to speak. I hope this doesn't too much like Mr. Caulfield, but it's pretty easy to tell if someone is a phony based on the type of music they listen to.

    3. Re:Ugh. by c00rdb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      someone with a taste in, say, pop and rap is probably someone who follows the popular trend and cannot think for themselves
      Nice work troll. Besides the fact that not all hip-hop (rap) is mainstream, did you ever think that these songs are popular because people like them, and not the other way around? Maybe, just maybe, some music becomes popular because people enjoy it. I'm sorry for blowing your brain with such a radical idea.
    4. Re:Ugh. by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I don't typically disparage people who don't know anything about the music I like. Instead I use it as a great change to expand their music experience. I think that's common amongst music geeks. What's the point of knowing all this music if we can't share it with others?

      Now if after listening to my music if they still don't like it, well... nobodies perfect I suppose.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    5. Re:Ugh. by solosaint · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Are you drunk or did your mother drink lead water when you were just a fetus? Let me illustrate with one of your retarded statements... "Someone with a taste in, say, pop and rap is probably someone who follows the popular trend and cannot think for themselves" What about people who listened to rap before it was popular? if rap declines in popularity? Should the people who still listen to it be called free thinkers, no wait, how about musical rebels! Since when did going with what's trendy mean you couldn't think for yourself? You should picket outside Banana Republic and shout out "stupid followers!!"

    6. Re:Ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...so judging people on that is very narrow-minded.
      You're right, stick with breast size and sexual receptivity for women and perceived ability to pwn for dudes.
    7. Re:Ugh. by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, most people don't use their taste in music to define themselves, so judging people on that is very narrow-minded.

      The article is about 18 year olds, many of whom do define themselves through their musical tastes. They are of necessity narrow and shallow--they have rarely killed or fought for their life, rarely had lovers or children or freinds die, rarely risked everything to achieve a dream. They haven't had time to do anything with their lives yet. And in the West there are few tribal institutions for them to attach their loyalty to: family is thankfully not very important, religion ditto, and while a few get latched onto sports teams of one kind or another the crass commercialism of popular sport is such that a tribal affilliation with a team is too lame even for the average teenager.

      To be useful as a source of the tribal feeling that all humans crave a thing must be public and communal. What is more public and communal than music? One day the teens will grow up and find a tribe of their own that is based on genuine common interests, if they're lucky. But until then they will find solace in being part of a tribe defined by the music they listen to.

      This is why so many bands are decried by their early followers as "sell outs" when they become popular. It is not the kind of music they are making that has changed, but the dillution of tribal feeling, of belonging, of being part of a select and special group, that causes the psychological pain.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    8. Re:Ugh. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty much the same. i'm always trying to find out about new music and exposing other people to music i like, if they don't like it then, oh well. it doesn't mean i think they're below me, but it does suggest to me that we won't be hanging out very often.

    9. Re:Ugh. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I don't disparage people who don't like or know what I listen to. Actually, I take pride in having a collection that will sooner or later disgust anyone.

      I guess permissiveness is one of the traits one develops being an omnivore concerning music (given any musical style I can usually find a band or at least a song I like). Even if I don't like someone else's taste I don't flame them for it; that's best left to the idiots participating in the neverending HipHop vs. Metal flamewar.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:Ugh. by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I declared years ago that I would never marry a woman who didn't like Anthrax or Wrathchild America. I didn't require a woman to be a fan of either band. When I asked, I usually answered that it was a way of expediting the whole "your music annoys me so much" argument that comes after you spend a lot of time in close association with somebody. I needed to know that the music I listened to most wouldn't annoy my wife. Of course, that wasn't the real reason. :)

      Now would be a good time to point out that Sound of White Noise was the current Anthrax album at the time. Since that album is toward the beginning of a new direction for them, it's important to notice that.

      Later, as in "within 2 years", I met a woman who went nuts when she saw I had Attack of the Killer B's. Naturally I exposed her to the rest of the band's offerings at the time, and *she* bought me Stomp 442 when it came out. So I threw Wratchild America at her. She pointed out it wasn't terribly accessible to people who aren't themselves musicians, but she did enjoy listening to it, even though she'd probably never pick it herself to listen to. That was good enough for me.

      After we had been married for awhile, she asked me what my requirements had been, and I told her. She picked out the musical requirement, interested in the fact that I didn't exclude any musical preference at all, and asked why it was.

      Here is what I told her, as best as I can reconstruct it. (I should write this as a folk song, but I'll spare you all)

      Anthrax's old music is fun-loving. It mostly doesn't approach serious political or social issues, it's not into devil-worshipping or any of that. It's all about being the best *you* you can be and having a good time of it. When it does approach serious political and social issues, the underlying concepts presented are personal freedom, responsibility (in particular corporate and government responsibility), tolerance towards people who are different (either because of race, religion, or whatever), and generally being cool to people. In order to like this music, even a little bit, I figured you needed to be somewhere to the left of conventional thought. You need to have the tolerance they talk about (I've never known a racist who liked Anthrax!). You need to be generally fun-loving, not take yourself too seriously, and value personal freedom.

      Wrathchild America is a little on the weird side. Here I wasn't looking for anything connected with lyrics, since they went into a lot of areas where the songs either don't make any sense, or they don't have much meaning to many people. One in particular was obsolete almost as soon as it was made due to the iron curtain falling. But here there is a fusion of jazz and metal in a really nice package that isn't just another rip of, er, I forgot the name, had the album with the inverted cross foldout...ummm.... former Misfits singer.... Anyway, most people can get past the lyrics just fine, no problems associating with the songs that aren't about vampires, no problems with the songs that are about vampires. Most people I've known get hung up on the music, in particular the fact that only somewhere around 40% of the music is in 4/4 time, with the rest having really weird timing. I figured the ideal wife for me wouldn't have any problems with the timing, and this would reflect that she could think in any direction she chose. I don't want to say open-minded, because it's a given that having an open mind was required to like either band, but it's close to the concept anyway.

      My wife prefers rap and country music, no use denying that. But she bought me tickets to an Anthrax show and then went with me, and we had a great time. :) Went to what amounted to the second row to mosh a bit, then decided we needed to back up because the pressure on people down in the front was so high we couldn't breathe, I don't know how those people could hang in the whole show. Anyway, these days I don't really give a rat's ass

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:Ugh. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      W00t ? Somebody with a clue on Slashdot ? Whodda thunk it. Thank you. You made my day brigther !

    12. Re:Ugh. by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      I am somewhat awestruck by the length of that digression.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
  21. Just note by in2mind · · Score: 2, Insightful
    FTA

    One really important caveat for this study was that the average age of the participants was around 18 so this finding might not hold in different age-groups.

    When 50 or 70 year old persons meet they probably would talk other things.

    1. Re:Just note by garcia · · Score: 1

      I talk about other things and I'm in my mid-twenties. Musical tastes don't make a shit of a difference to me (or anyone that I have dated) when selecting a mate.

      Honestly, if someone found that they were incompatible with me because of the music I listen to, I would have a hard time believing that they were worth it.

    2. Re:Just note by mopower70 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not quite 50, but I can get a pretty good feel for how I'm going to relate with someone by mentioning the Iraq occupation or global warming. They're charged enough topics that you can get a feel for the person's political, social, and religious leanings without the overt hostility you'd get from mentioning, say, abortion or affirmative action. The responses are usually along a broad spectrum and give enough color to figure out how sympatico you'll be.

    3. Re:Just note by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      I gotta say I was thinking the same thing when I read this. While there's no denying that music is a common topic of discussion when meeting new people, I think to much is being read into it. Like some one above me said, its a safe topic and can read at least a little bit about a person without asking the dangerous questions.

      My wife and I have relatively little overlap on the music we 'really' like, and I don't see what the big deal is. Hell, I didn't even notice that until awhile after we were married, and we were together for 3 years before that. Our first conversations some how ended up being about science fiction and the X-men, despite my (then recent) habit of trying to avoid those topics that revealed just how big of a dork I actually was.

      I guess if two people were really into music, like that record store guy in High Fidelity was, there could be a bond on that. But most people like music in the same way, not as a form of obsession that they actively think about...but a general part of life experience. Most people like music in the same way most people drive cars. They drive cars, enjoy the cars and even talk about their cars...but they don't all care how they work, watch racing, pimp their cars out or become auto engineers.

      Music is just handy because its something college people are all generally somewhat into.

  22. Her - I love you by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me - I love you too.
    Her - Yeah, they are a great band.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Her - I love you by ironring2006 · · Score: 1

      Me - Who? Her - No, not who, you too! Me - the band? Her - No, not the band the band, you too the band! Me - Umm, yeah, I love you too too

    2. Re:Her - I love you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damnit I have to quit blirting out what I'm thinking all the time!"

      "Like the fact that you had way too much garlic for lunch." "Frack!"

    3. Re:Her - I love you by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      U2 sux. (waiting for the moderators to club this post to oblivion ... whoa that was quick - I haven't even posted yet)

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  23. Phooey by bendodge · · Score: 4, Funny

    My first question is "Do you know what Linux is?". I find that is infinitely more helpful than asking what music somebody likes.

    --
    The government can't save you.
    1. Re:Phooey by syphax · · Score: 1


      Yeah, that weeds out the hotties real quick.

      Apologies to all the smokin' female Linux users out there...

      --
      Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
    2. Re:Phooey by marto · · Score: 1

      Interesting approach. As a matter of interest how many people of your sexual preference have known what Linux is? If they say no do you plan on converting them away from Windows ME :P

    3. Re:Phooey by bendodge · · Score: 1

      As of yet, I have not had anyone I didn't know before say "yes". If they say no, I then ask if they know what Firefox is. I get a lot more positive results on this one.

      I guess I am one of the extreme cultural minorities, because:
      1. I use Linux
      2. I use Firefox
      3. I program
      4. I love classical music, and hate it when people blather about junk bands.

      So I usually try to avoid the music topic.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    4. Re:Phooey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Apologies to all the smokin' female Linux users out there...

      She'll get over it.

  24. personalized by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2, Interesting

    music is very personalized and ubiquitous. There's probably very few people in America who haven't heard the top 5 songs of the day, whether they like them or not. Music is also easily accessible. In 3 - 5 minutes, a song could deliver lyrics that could change your mood or teach you things - like a little psychology session. And, people usually listen to music at any time for different things. People have music to study to, dance to, listen to when they're happy and music for depression. The easily accessible 3 minute package makes it easy to have music a part of your life unlike any other form of media. Books require a lot of attention and time, and tv isn't as portable and requires too much attention as well. It's really not surprising that music choices are the biggest conversation topic.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:personalized by bigdavex · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting thought.

      The Billboard Hot 100

      1. Beyonce
        Irreplaceable

      2. Fall Out Boy
        This Ain't A Scene, It's An Arms Race

      3. Nelly Furtado
        Say It Right

      4. Daughtry
        It's Not Over

      5. Akon Featuring Snoop Dogg
        I Wanna Love You


      I've heard of Beyonce, Snoop Dogg, and Nelly. I don't know that I've heard any of these songs. It's possible that I've insulated myself sufficiently by listening to Old Fogey Radio.
      --
      -Dave
    2. Re:personalized by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      Same here, I guess I am out of touch.

      I haven't bothered to tuneprogram the radio in my car (that I bought 5 years ago) and that tends to be where I hear "popular" music.

      I do however listen to a lot of music though....

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    3. Re:personalized by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I'm with you, the GP is way off.

      I don't listen to any radio except talk and occasionally classical. I don't know any of these songs either, although I recognize some of the names, and I'd give a 99% chance that I would hate them if I did hear them. If I am insulated, it is only from corporate mass-media garbage.

      I do like plenty of "classic rock" that is mainstream enough that people will know about it, but why listen to a "classic rock" radio station 75% of whose entire playlist is about 3% of what I carry on my MP3 player?

      In the real world, I would bet that maybe 10% of the population would know of the Top 5 songs.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  25. F.O.R.M. by xTantrum · · Score: 1

    i been away for awhile so i forget the kinda articles sometimes on /. OF course music is a relevant subject of interests. its one of the easiest ways to break the ice and see how compatible someone is with you. let me help the hapless /.ers who haven't been laid in awhile. don't get tongue tied when you talking to a chick. keep this accronym in mind. FORM. Family Occupation Recreation Music. thats my .02 cents any more info on how to get layed is gonna cost you. I open to bargaining i have this seg fault i can't figure out...

    --
    $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
  26. my ipod by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

    The only thing on my iPod is the soothing sounds of Crispin Hellion Glover. What does that say about me?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:my ipod by Skadet · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only thing on my iPod is the soothing sounds of Crispin Hellion Glover. What does that say about me?
      You've got an older, low-capacity Shuffle?
    2. Re:my ipod by Grym · · Score: 1

      The only thing on my iPod is the soothing sounds of Crispin Hellion Glover. What does that say about me?

      It's interesting that you should bring that up, because the results show that you have latent beastality tendencies... and you touch yourself at night.

      Just kidding. As other people have mentioned, this study doesn't mean much at all. People just talk about music because it's an ice-breaker. It prevents dreaded conversational deadspace that can make even the most extroverted of us akward. Can you tell something about a person by the music he or she prefers? Sure. But certainly not enough to make proper dating decision. Notice how none of the traits they bring up are bad. They all indicate positive traits like emotionally stable, extroverted, or intellectual, not bad attributes like violent, ignorant, or divisive which, honestly, would be far more informative.

      Just another pop-psychology study to be discarded with the rest. Move along, nothing to see here.

      -Grym

    3. Re:my ipod by AikonMGB · · Score: 1

      Well I'll be damned.. and here I thought he was just an eccentric man who's son traveled back in time to save his marriage :O

      Aikon-

    4. Re:my ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That you are a sad man who has long come to realise that he is utterly devoid of any real personality and so has affected a silly quirk in a futile attempt to spare himself the ten millionth look of disappointment in a newly initiated conversation. Ain't working.

      And in a hilarious coincidence, my captcha for this post is "deluded".

    5. Re:my ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing on my iPod is the soothing sounds of Crispin Hellion Glover. What does that say about me?

      I still haven't heard his recordings (not about to use Windows Media Player or Real Player so I'll have to find him someplace besides Amazon for samples), but from the descriptions on Amazon, soothing may be an understatement...

      Auto-Manipulator. A song about nothing but masturbation.
      "I'M AN AU...TO...MANI-PU-LATOR. I PLAY WITH MYSELF...I'M A MASTURBATOR." [later in the song] "I close the bathroom door, I be lookin' so cool, my mama don't know I been touchin' my tool"

  27. shit by ArmorFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    Psychologists have talked about the importance of body language, physical appearance and clothing.
    Physical appearance and clothing matters?! Now that's what I call News for Nerds.
    1. Re:shit by ShadoHawk · · Score: 0

      Good thing I stocked up on all those WoW T-Shirts!

    2. Re:shit by phasm42 · · Score: 1

      Score!

      --
      "No one likes working in a hamster wheel, and your shop smells of cedar shavings from here." - TaleSpinner
  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. A human being != a personality by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How do we make friends and get to know other people?

    I hate shit like this. Question: Do you want to know how to make friends, or do you want to make friends? Because when you start to look for the secret procedure behind friendship, you start looking at people as if they were abstract personalities, with some quanitifiable set of properties, and you stop looking at them as human beings. And this attitude can prevent you from actually connecting with them. It's completely absurd. Not everything is meant to be turned into cold science.

    1. Re:A human being != a personality by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you insightful if I had points. However, you are being a bit mean to all of the people who will never actually become people themselves. The best they have to hope for is to follow directions and become the kind of automaton that others want them to be. And you want to take that away. Thank you for taking the time to make them feed bad - I hate them too. =)

    2. Re:A human being != a personality by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Wow, that was one of the strangest posts I've seen here. Is sociology now evil? If you're not interested, don't read the fucking study.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:A human being != a personality by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Is sociology now evil?" Evil? No. Useless? Yes.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:A human being != a personality by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 1

      I know, I felt kinda weird after posting it. I tend to get worked up by this type of discussion (on or off Slashdot). That's just me. I wouldn't call sociology "evil", if it's not taken too seriously. I just didn't like the pretentious tone of the summary (and article) and I'm also interested in seeing how people react to a comment like that on Slashdot.

    5. Re:A human being != a personality by Kopretinka · · Score: 1

      This is a psychology study, it's supposed to be cold science. Do you complain about the categorization of insects being cold science because it describes the beautiful butterflies in the same terms as the cockroaches? These people want to know how we make friends, regardless of whether they have any or not.

      Socializing is an exercise in not being too boring but not being too excentric either. If somebody's first topic is the collected works of Tolstoy, they may learn from a study like this that they might choose talking about music instead, to get closer to somebody and slowly discover if Tolstoy would be a good topic.

      Or is a relationship worth less just because the Tolstoy freak (exaggerating here) controlled himself and didn't reveal his true passions right away? He'll sure prefer 10 lesser relationships to none at all.

      --
      Yesterday was the time to do it right. Are we having a REVOLUTION yet?
    6. Re:A human being != a personality by Rithiur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may not be important for *you* to know how to make friends, but it helps to understand how humans generally act in social situation. There are variety of ways to use this kind of information to help people have better lives, therapy being most notable.

      Say what you will, but humans are automatons to certain extent, enough to have predictable behavioral patterns.

    7. Re:A human being != a personality by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I agreed with most of your post; "social robots" are scary. It was that last sentence that elicited my WTF reaction.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    8. Re:A human being != a personality by HappySqurriel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you want to know how to make friends, or do you want to make friends?

      Do you want to know how to do math, or do you want to do math?

      For many people in the world the answer is do math because they have never seen it as being particularly difficult; as an example, until my forth year of mathematics in university I never bought a text book because the material was obvious. As hard as it is for most of us to understand there are millions of people in this world who have difficulty making friends, getting into romantic relationships, and functioning in a work place; by studying how personal relationships are formed, and how people interact, you can figure out a way to help people with their own issues. There is value in this work regardless of whether you see it.

    9. Re:A human being != a personality by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because when you start to look for the secret procedure behind friendship, you start looking at people as if they were abstract personalities, with some quanitifiable set of properties, and you stop looking at them as human beings.

      Long ago I read a book where two characters were discussing personality types. One character claimed he categorized people into two groups. He'd show people the idyllic garden behind his home and eventually tell them he had built that small hill, and moved those rocks so they looked like they had fallen there, and reshaped the stream to run a different way. One type of people were appalled that the beauty was not natural and felt disillusioned and the other group were amazed by his ability to create beauty and enlightened by the knowledge. The claim was that some people prefer to believe in the beauty in the natural world, while others prefer to see the beauty inside a person expressed.

      I don't believe in such dichotomies, but I think there is a valuable lesson there. Understanding the processes that lay behind some phenomenon need not devalue that phenomenon and may in fact enhance one's appreciation of it. Every day I am appalled by the ignorance and meanness and stupidity and selfishness of people. They lie right to your face, care nothing for people they profess to love, and are unthinking animals in making decisions, while they are cold and calculating robot lawyers when it comes to justifying those same actions.

      Every day I am amazed by how amazingly generous and giving people are. People will ruin their entire day to avoid disappointing a friend, children put us all to shame with their friendliness and wonder and lack of prejudice, and people with completely different world views and beliefs can set that aside to do some good in the world.

      I've read more psychology books than some psychologists I know. I am very good at understanding people's motivations and feelings. I understand and implement a half dozen different models of the human animal. I don't think that stops me at all from being a very social person and I don't think it objectifies people. I don't have any trouble making friends and always seem to be meeting new people.

      I think it is important to recognize that understanding the human mind in a scientific sense does not mean you cannot understand it from a human perspective as well, and empathize and connect. These are not mutually exclusive points of view.

    10. Re:A human being != a personality by Rycross · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some of us out there have a really hard time making friends. You are able to just make friends because you've passively learned the social protocols for doing so. They've become second nature to you. But there are a lot of people out there who, for one reason or another, never really learned the proper protocols, or haven't learned them to the degree that they are able to make friends easily. Woe be to you if you're one of these people and an adult. It effects every area of your life, and you are given almost no opportunity to learn by doing. People tend to not want to put up with socially awkward people in their inner circle. There's some very real value in being able to study behavior to make up for lost time, and apply those lessons to our own behavior, so we have some hope of fitting in.

    11. Re:A human being != a personality by danpsmith · · Score: 1

      I hate shit like this. Question: Do you want to know how to make friends, or do you want to make friends? Because when you start to look for the secret procedure behind friendship, you start looking at people as if they were abstract personalities, with some quanitifiable set of properties, and you stop looking at them as human beings. And this attitude can prevent you from actually connecting with them. It's completely absurd. Not everything is meant to be turned into cold science.

      Great point. I've noticed that the best way to meet people and get to know them is to just be a human being yourself and stop analyzing the situation or worrying about what the right thing to say is. If you often say "the wrong thing" to a person you are trying to be friends with naturally after you've had the "hey what type of music do you like" banter, you are less likely to really want to continue a relationship with them anyway. Best thing to do is say what you like most of the time. Works for most non-serial murderers. Unless you are thinking about very strange things all day, most people will be able to relate to what you want to talk about. Sometimes if even if you talk about strange things people will dig it because it's different. Instead of being a drone everywhere you go, if you just genuinely interact with your environment and the people around you, you will make more friends and have more conversations than you know how to deal with.

      --
      Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    12. Re:A human being != a personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I would have to respectfully disagree. Concrete procedures are not "completely absurd." Yes I have very many close friends that I love dearly, and that love me back, but I would have never met them if it wasn't for an intermediary with a lot more charisma and social aptitude than I have. Now that we've gone our separate paths, and I have moved to a new area, if I'm going to set up a new circle, I'm going to have to do real concrete work to develop my own social skills and confidence. Which pretty much boils down to, "OK. At this party you will introduce yourself to a complete stranger. Ask them questions and get them to talk about themselves. Act interested. Make eye contact and smile." My thought process really goes like that.

      Yes, once I go through that ad nauseum, I find the real friends I hold onto. I stop following any steps and just wing it. But to meet these people, yes, I need the steps.

      Work with a great therapist has worked wonders. And yes, I also take medication for this. All concrete steps I had to consciously take.

    13. Re:A human being != a personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you start looking at people as if they were abstract personalities, with some quanitifiable set of properties, and you stop looking at them as human beings

      I've already joined the Borg, you insensitive clod.

    14. Re:A human being != a personality by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 1

      Your point is well-stated, but actually, I've been the social leper plenty of times. Don't you worry. I'm pretty experienced with that kind of anxiety. It really stems from having an over-active intellect, where you objectify, judge and analyze yourself and others. And that's exactly what TFA does. So I wanted to make an example out of it.

      I also think that if a person cares, it's ever too late for them to learn some social grace. If you're interested in them, with no expectations, they'll be interested in you.

    15. Re:A human being != a personality by .Chndru · · Score: 1

      These are wise words. Mod parent up!

    16. Re:A human being != a personality by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "ecause when you start to look for the secret procedure behind friendship, you start looking at people as if they were abstract personalities, with some quanitifiable set of properties, and you stop looking at them as human beings. And this attitude can prevent you from actually connecting with them. It's completely absurd"

      It's not absurd, the whole pickup community is based around guys who are inept, many of which who's minds do not get positive psychological rewards from socializing (or they would be out there wouldn't they?).

      Just because you need to understand how socializing works in the abstract doesn't mean you stop treating people as if they weren't "human", but you do have to realize that people's behaviour is simply an expression of genetically programmed evolutionary forces at work that most people don't even understand, they simply do not even understand their own behaviour 99% of the time. They just get feelings and do the behaviour.

      Mystery's theories on how women work are enormously powerful if you are a social guru or are out every night, you'll see what he says again and again, and you start seeing people like robots, and they are, biological machines programmed by evolution to survive and adapt to their environments. Their is NOTHING wrong seeing people for how they truly are, it's only romanticism that gets in a way of a persons objectivity.

      Like I said, just because you understand the abstraction does not mean you do not treat people as less then human, but it is a fact that many guys do not get positive feedback from socializing, they'd rather be playing WoW, studying physics, or solving the worlds problems, but they have biological and psychological needs that need to be satisfied.

      http://www.themysterymethod.com/forum/index.php
      http://www.bristollair.com/

  30. Definitly nothing profound by TinBromide · · Score: 5, Interesting

    they said the average age was like 18. What do 18 year olds have to talk about with random peers? If you mix an accountant and a construction worker, they may have similarities in that they may have kids, be sick of the boss, have funny co-worker stories.

    Most 18 year olds don't have profound achievements that have a commonality. If you have kids, you don't mind hearing about other people's kids. If you're in physics club, you probably don't want to hear about a wrestling match.

    Studies also show that teenagers blow at empathetic responses, so it harder to tell if someone is interested by subtle clues. If someone follows along on the conversation, its a go... So music is the most common ground shared by all teens.

    Except me, i really didn't ever listen to the radio.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:Definitly nothing profound by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      You nailed it. I completely agree with you. First thing i thought, without reading the article, was "What was the average age of the person polled?"

      Back in high-school, first thing I would've asked someone i just met is "So what do you listen to?" And i thought I was so smart because I would build a personality around this person based on what kind of music he/she listened to. Today, now that I'm out of a school, working and married, I could give a damn about what someone else listens to.

  31. Less chance of looking like a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think it would have something to do with not wanting to admit you still watch Saturday morning Spiderman (mostly the guys) or Hello Kitty (chicks), and thus appearing immature...

  32. Myers-Briggs Jung by HappySqurriel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing I would like to see is musical preferences by Myers-Briggs/Jung personality type. I mention this because, although imperfect, I have found that these personality types will give you a lot of information about a person. Someone who is ENFP (typical 'party girl') is mostly only interested in having fun and would likely be really into the pop-music of the day, on the other hand someone who is ISTJ (typical accountant) is probably going to be far more interested in technical perfection and may like Classical or Jazz; the reason musical taste could be important is an ENFP will think that the ISTJ and his music is boring whereas the ISTJ will think that the ENFP's music and lifestyle are pointless.

    1. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      question:

      I like Jazz, Bluegrass, Country, Classic Rock, Death/Black metal, Jungle, Breaks, "political rap" (i.e. immortal technique) Opera, Ambient, Noisecore, Power Metal, Mathcore, Tech-Step, Trip-Hop....

      What kind of personality would you put that at?

    2. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by straybullets · · Score: 2, Funny

      the personnality of someone who likes to put labels on things ? ;)

      --
      With that aggravating beauty, Lulu Walls.
    3. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by mekkab · · Score: 1

      ENTP. No question about it.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      As a guess ... INTJ

      I am an INTJ (and I suspect that although we only represent 1% of the population we're pretty common on Slashdot) and one of the more obvious characteristics of our personality type is an interest in everything ... Just a guess though

    5. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by damacus · · Score: 1

      I second that analysis. Or an INTP. Pretty similar also.

    6. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      ENTP. No question about it.
      That's funny, because based on what my personality is IRL matches exactly ZERO of the things that identify ENTP.

      I will never tell someone they are wrong to have an interest in something, nor have I ever found anyone "boring."

      EVERYBODY is an interesting person. That doesn't mean they are good or bad. However, I have yet to meet or see a single solitary person that I would call boring. In addition, I have yet to meet or see a single solitary person that I would apply a "personality" type to.

      Every person living on this planet is two-faced. The fun part is discovering that other face.
    7. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would guess you are definitely not SJ. You are possibly SP, though I would think you are more likely to be N. The fact that you like some edgy, non-traditional, non-mainstream genres indicates some acceptance of or affinity towards counter-culture or non-traditional ideals (N). Whether it appeals to you evocatively or intellectually, you do not say, but it may indicate a F/T preferrence. Whether you prefer to listen to this music alone or at parties could indicate E/I preferrence, but it is probably not the best indicator. FWIW, I enjoy a very diverse music set also, including many of the things you list except for Country, Death/Black metal, and Noisecore.

      -a

    8. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      My acceptance and affinity towards non-mainstream/counter-culture genres is mainly due to the fact that most of what you hear on the readio is the same old same old...different band name, same music. The non-mainstream/counter-culture stuff appeals to me evocatively, but primarily intellectually.

      As far as listening alone or at a party, I actually prefer to listen to whatever the majority of the people at the party are listening to. I find it easier to converse with people I don't know if they are in an environment that works best for them, primarily because ANY environment works well for me.

      If I am alone, it depends on the activity...certain video games, recreational activities, sex....it really all depends on what I am doing. I tend to associate certain music and certain bands with specific NIGHTS in my life as well as with certain activities.

      For the record, depeche mode is the best thing to make love to, whereas growling death metal is the best thing for hard-core fucking. For trippy, emotional, all-in-your-head connectivity sex, either "In Silico" from Deepsky or the second CD to "Drukqs" from Aphex Twin is recommended.

    9. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What kind of personality would you put that at?

      Elitist prick who tries really hard to be able to snub his nose at anyone who's not as "diverse" as he is.

    10. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      INTP is supposed to be the more "open" type in the sense I think you're using the word, but it is an interesting conjecture.

      (I'm an INTJ and also have a very wide range of musical tastes, though I suppose my "primary" genre is classical these days).

    11. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm INTJ and I don't even listen to music. It's not that I don't like music at all, it's just that I can't be bothered to turn on the radio and I don't think it's worth it to pay for music. (I don't even bother downloading it from the internet.)

    12. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

      ...I have yet to meet or see a single solitary person that I would call boring. I think you're dropping wayyy too much acid.
    13. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by EvilNight · · Score: 1

      Heh, thirded. INTJ and into more genres and styles than I can remember. I'm the guy my friends come to when they need some fresh music recommendations.

      Learning to like a style is like picking a lock. Sooner or later you hit on an album in that style that really appeals to you. After going through a few more like that first one, suddenly everything in that genre starts getting more appealing. I somehow doubt that this is restricted to INTJ, though. I'd wager it works for everyone, but only certain personality types are going to want to spend the time acquiring the tastes. Music is a background thing for most people, rather than a hobby or a passion.

      I've learned three things in my musical travels...
        - Nothing is ever old until after you've heard it yourself.
        - The masterpiece reveals itself when the listener is ready. (Thank you, Amarok)
        - Some music (usually the best of all) requires your full, undivided attention.

      --
      Hell is being intelligent in a world full of idiots.
    14. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      are you kidding? If I was dropping like I did back in highschool, then even grass would be considered to be interesting...

      How it waves in the wind...the little blades flittering back and forth uncontrollably...like they are talking...

      THE GRASS IS TALKING MAN. IT'S ALIVE. WE SHOULD LISTEN. /trip

    15. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by lcsjk · · Score: 1
      Me too! Your want to get married? ... Well, maybe I am not so sure about political rap.

      Also, I think you left out Barbara and PP&M, also, brothers-4, but you did leave it open ended....

      Now, reconsidering, I'm not so sure about your music tastes.

      Forget the marriage. Maybe we could just hang out together. Do you like sex?

    16. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by poticlin · · Score: 1
      ENFP (typical 'party girl')

      I'm an ENFP, so your telling me my genitals are wrong, that in fact my personality defines my gender, That in fact im a party Girl!


      N.B. Not to be confused with http://homepage.ntlworld.com/gary.hart/lyricsa/ima ges/aqua.jpgBarbie Girl

    17. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Once again we learn about people.

      I was mentioning the diverse amount of music I listen to in an effort to show that I can relate to just about anyone, not so I can say I have a problem with people that have no variety in their musical selection.

      I don't like judging people based on one or two things they have said.

      I have no problem judging you though, asshole.

    18. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me add "and completely devoid of anything resembling a sense of humour" to (other) AC's assesment.

    19. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      An AC making a post with an insult in it can only be assumed as being geuine, not a joke.

      Posting AC is like pissing into the wind.

    20. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC is like pissing into the wind.

      I'm confused. How does posting anonymously remind you of the sea?

    21. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Aye Captain!

    22. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "political rap" (i.e. immortal technique)

      I'd say that puts you in the TMCJ (Trendy Music Critic Jargon) group.

    23. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Elemenope · · Score: 1

      The I/E element doesn't seem to be that relevant for choice of music for *private* listening. As an ENTP, I too have a wide range of musical taste, from Philip Glass to System of a Down, but I find that I am much pickier in private than public listening. For me, music playing of any sort that doesn't involve cringing and isn't too fscking loud is an effective lubricant for group social interaction, much like a movie playing in the background.

      --
      All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
    24. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have yet to meet or see a single solitary person that I would apply a "personality" type to."

      You just aren't trying hard enough.

      "Every person living on this planet is two-faced."

      Wait, isn't 2-faced a personality? It is a career qualification at the very least.

    25. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I won't deny that I like trying to shoehorn bands into genres. It's fun, and often times quite challenging.

      For example: Try to put Porcupine Tree or Tool into a genre. I've been trying for years.

    26. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by coaxial · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that would work. Musical tastes are heavily influenced by your cultural surroundings. If everyone around you listens to x, you're very likely to listen to x. Sure selection is going on. It's not like music is like religion. (Almost no one on the planet picks their religion. Their PARENTS picked it for them. Even if they say they "chose," they mostly picked the same religion as their parents. i.e. They picked the one they were raised in and "choosing" is little more than a rite of passage.) But your friends and your cultural identity figure very large in that equation.

      You're premise is based on stereotypes. It's no different than the old stereotype that smart people listen to classical music. A whole buiness of ripping people off is based on this stereotype. Want your plants to grow big? Play classical music.

      I know lots of very smart people, from all around the world. I don't know anyone that listens to classical music. Annoying chinese pop-ballads? Check. Deathmetal? Check. Country? Check. Electronica? Check. Indie? Check. Rock? Check. I've never seen a correlation between intellegence and classical music.

      Anyway, you're experiment already fails since there's way more than 16 genres of music.

    27. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get trolled a lot, don't you?

    28. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Pojut · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      For two reasons.

      1. I usually have good ideas, which are a beacon for trolls (yes I am full of myself. Sue me.)
      2. I feed them.

    29. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by syousef · · Score: 1

      You might as well go by star sign. Myers-Briggs/Jung personality tests are complete pseudoscientific BS.

      http://skepdic.com/myersb.html

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    30. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by petro6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would tend to agree. Personality profiles based on the Big 5 personality traits (MBTI only has 4, but I think isn't far from the type of personality assessment described in this study) is like taking a piece of a person's attitude at a given time and applying it roughshod to the person's entire life.
      Usually such measurements require heavy self-assessment and a mindful subject can make themselves seem however they want (even with "lie detector" questions).
      I'm curious to read the study, but I put little stock in Personology...erm... personality psychology.

    31. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by unDees · · Score: 1

      I am an ENFP, but I'm not a party girl -- you insensitive, like, clod!

      --
      "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
    32. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      If you like Political rap, look at Suburban Noize Records

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    33. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by djupedal · · Score: 1

      "...however, I have yet to meet or see a single solitary person that I would call boring"

      Ignoring the face in the mirror, again, are we...?

      "meet or see a single solitary person"
      If you're gonna meet 'em, Dickey, you're most likely gonna have to see em. And unless you're wearing Guinness goggles, single means solitary, now, don't it? ...my god...

      I did me best, ey' did, to ignore such petulant grammar first time through, however incessant redundancy, twice of course, is a free ticket to being dragged out into the street and subsequently run over, not once mind you, but of course twice, by a fast-moving DHL wagon, chock full o' two-headed collectible bobble-heads from a recent forced overstock sale at crap-heads.com. Puh-leeze refrain from EVER doing such callous disregard to any known language, again, thanks.

    34. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. You express yourself very poorly and seem unaware of it, also a magnet.

    35. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      did me best, ey' did, to ignore such petulant grammar first time through, however incessant redundancy, twice of course, is a free ticket to being dragged out into the street and subsequently run over, not once mind you, but of course twice, by a fast-moving DHL wagon, chock full o' two-headed collectible bobble-heads from a recent forced overstock sale at crap-heads.com. Puh-leeze refrain from EVER doing such callous disregard to any known language, again, thanks.

      I just can't believe you wrote that paragraph bitching about someone's grammar. Really, I just can't believe it, even though I can see it.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    36. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think Judas Priest is the best for making love, and Tchaikovsky is the best for fucking, especially if you can time all applicable orgasms to coincide with the cannons.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    37. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "between intellegence and classical music."

      Personally I don't think its intelligence and classical music, I think it has more to do with RANGE of music. And that when people say "classical" they don't MEAN classical, they mean music that uses real instruments typically associated with classical. Many arrangements and music from video games that is done with classical instruments doesn't really make "classical" songs.

    38. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Why not split the difference with AC/DC's "For Those About to Rock"?

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    39. Re:Myers-Briggs Jung by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      That song puts me to sleep. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  33. Subconscious Connection? by Mephistophocles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be interesting to see this study taken further. I suspect that there is more to this than just coincidence - that is, one will probably find that people with similar tastes in music often have similar political/religious/philosophical views, education, perhaps even similar skills/interests, childhood experiences, etc. It's just a hypothesis, but I bet there's some truth to it. Any psychologists out there know of such a study having been done?

    --
    Deja Moo: The distinct feeling that you've heard this bull before.
    1. Re:Subconscious Connection? by Saige · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, then something like Last.fm would be a good place to test it - ideally, people should find most of their musical neighbors have very similar views and the like.

      I can say that for the most part, I've gotten along well with all my neighbors on the site that I've chatted with.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  34. It's not that it's useful by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    More that it's non-threatening. When you are first getting to know someone, you usually aren't up for divulging your most personal secrets. However, you do need something to talk about other than the weather. Things like music are a good starting point. You probably don't really get, or give, much useful info about yourself but it is something to talk about and helps you get more familiar.

    Relationships are about emotion, there's not always logic to how or why we do things.

  35. playlist sharing by doti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yesterday I was at a small party, the music was from an iPod. One song caught my attention, and I wanted to know what song and artist it was.

    It would be nice to have this feature on the (wireless/bluetooth enabled) digital music players: an option to share the playlist, so I could get my cellphone and read (and store) the info on the music being played.

    --
    factor 966971: 966971
    1. Re:playlist sharing by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      The simple solution is to just take a quick look at the iPod. Although wireless sharing of the playlist would be neat.

    2. Re:playlist sharing by doti · · Score: 1

      Taking a look *and* writing or memorizing. That is, *if* you have access to the iPod.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    3. Re:playlist sharing by El_Isma · · Score: 1

      No, NO, NO! That's not the way to do it! That was the perfect oportunity to go and chat to somebody. It's the perfect excuse to socialize... Oh... Nerds... ;)

    4. Re:playlist sharing by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yes, technology should really be used to solve these complicated issues such as this one. Otherwise, you might have had to get up and look, or ask someone around you. And I am guessing, it was not THAT sort of party.

  36. Fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taking you off my friends list.

  37. I see great potential by Dracil · · Score: 1

    With combining this with a service like last.fm since it already automatically finds people with similar musical taste as you. Last.fm as a music dating service?

  38. You're defined by your subculture... by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and your subculture is most accurately represented by its music acts.

    I can determine more about a person I meet from, "I like Brittney Spears and Justin Timberlake" or "I have two playlists: GWAR, and other" (including their willingness to admit either of those) than I can from half a dozen other interests and opinions.

    Clothing often crosses subcultures, as do slang, political opinion, religious belief and behavior, but there are very people whose personality and approach to life will defy their music tastes. When was the last time you met a hyper-aggressive, Type-A asshole who lists smooth Jazz before Metallica?

    Of course, when you meet someone who says they like "everything" and then proceeds to list mainstream rock AND mainstream rap, know the conversation doesn't need to proceed any further because they're a fucking toolbox.

    1. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by ironring2006 · · Score: 1

      Just because someone says they like everything and will first proceed to list mainstream rock and rap doesn't automatically make them a toolbox. Often times these sorts of conversations will attempt to seek out a commonality. So someone who listens to everything may begin by saying the more mainstream bands in an attempt to find something that you like. Think of it as a refined search product. If you like a certain band that has roots, is inspired by, or is similar to some off beat indie band, they I don't come across as a pretentious asshole by only listing the bands that you may not have heard of. It's a lot easier to say, hey you like band (mainstream) A, have you ever heard of band (unknown gem) B? You might like them. Music elitist snobs have got to be the worst. If you like a band so much, you should spread the word and share it with the world, not keep it to yourself so you can look feel good about yourself about being a music conoisseur.

    2. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they won't like the band anymore after it becomes famous and 'sells out' so they have a vested interest in hiding away their little secret. Surely you've witnessed this behavior. Hell, I would go even so far as to say I've done the exact same thing myself. Its stupid, but these bands are seen as an exclusive club that only a select few 'get in too'. When the doors are opened to everyone, it loses that appeal.

    3. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by Arivia · · Score: 1

      I'm an easygoing English/Women's Studies major who can't get enough death metal in her diet. I'll take "What is the opposite of your example, Alex" for 400.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    4. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by petro6 · · Score: 1

      I always love when music conversations end like this:
      A: Oh you like Band X... I do too. Do you listen to Band Y
      B: I liked them before they sold out.
      A: I don't think they sold out... they just signed on to a major record label. their music is still good.
      B: [Rolls Eyes]

      Music elitists who try to out-indie or out-underground a person who is trying to find musical common ground just grate my nerves.... especially when I find myself doing it 0_o

      Nonetheless, I challenge you not to lose all respect for a person that lists Nickleback as their favorite band and thinks Kelly Clarkson is the best thing since Captain and Tennille.

    5. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 1

      A. What do you find attractive about aggressive, angry music if you're so mellow and easygoing? Surely there's something a bit significant going on beneath the surface?

      B. If an exception to the rule exists, that rule might still exist.

      C. Maybe my correlation seemed too direct and literal. One can be an aggressive person and claim an affinity for light music, and vice versa, but there's still an identity issue there. It's how one wishes to be perceived, how one perceives oneself, or what one wishes to be -- for example, enigmatic or eclectic..

    6. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by Aptgetupdate · · Score: 1

      First, it was a joke. Second, the joke was that one would claim "every"thing and not expose themself to anything beyond mainstream pop (there's a whole world out there that isn't stuffed down your throat by marketing geeks, and you have to find it for yourself.)

      Someone either open-minded, or pretentious, or ignorant enough to like "everything" is rare...but for someone take that stance and not pursue it, by at least experimenting with what's out there, at all, makes them a tool. Therein lies the humor.

      So, the pirate said, "it's drivin me nuts" because it was making him mad, while playing on the fact he had a steering wheel, used for driving, attached to his nuts.

    7. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by Arivia · · Score: 1

      I enjoy metal for two reasons.

      1) The energy in it is infectious: while I'm definitely more emotionally attached to my Sarah McLachlan or my Alanis Morisette, there's nothing like blasting a little Zyklon in the morning to get me going.

      2) Part of the reason I'm so easygoing is that I'm a subjectivist who doesn't think there's anything necessarily bad with the darker aspects of life or art: the woe in doom metal is sister to joy or beauty in ambient or trance, and they all deserve equal experience.

      Well, 3. There's simply some beautiful music amongst it.

      I'm not going to dispute your B, and I think my 2 probably answers your C.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    8. Re:You're defined by your subculture... by ironring2006 · · Score: 1

      Well, apparently I could easily get into a indie/obscure band dick swingin' contest with you since I was just defending the fact that I'm one of those rare open-minded music lovers (probably like you), but I'll avoid that disaster for fear of you drivin' me nuts, and yes, I do have two hands on my steering wheel ;)

  39. Music by SandwhichMaster · · Score: 1

    You can tell a lot about someone by their taste in music. I think the music you listen to reflects (but not necessarily defines) your personality. What would your first impressions be if someone says they mostly listens to angry music? Dance music? Ska? The Cure? Greatful dead? etc.

  40. So... by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    we have a study in TFA that claims people are prone to discuss music when meeting each other, but on Slashdot the discussion about TFA is minimally good, at best, and yet most of it is about music. /. isn't quite the place to be making the point that Fallout Boy sucks.

    The results of this study though aren't terribly surprising - as mentioned above, one of the first (and most important things) I talk about when meeting someone new is music. And it makes sense that its such a great topic of discussion - music is everywhere in our lives: on TV, movies, in the car, on the bus, football games, malls, convience stores - hell, I got pulled by a cop once who was listening to a local country station in his cruiser.

    All throughout childhood, riding in the car on long trips or even just sitting at home with my parents, there would always be some kind of music playing. Oldies, jazz, the Eagles, etc., and all of that exposure has molded my ideas about music and when I meet someone new, comparing musical tastes is great because it allows you to connect to someone else almost instantly - I don't know your name, but you're a Fugazi fan, so lets talk about Fugazi to break the ice...it works better than the traditional icebreakers - I mean, imagine meeting someone and having them say "OK, you just cross your arms and fall backwards and I'll catch you - oh, and hi, I'm John."

  41. Safe and sure by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

    Two things.

    One, it's a common interest. Lots of people don't read. Many aren't into painting or cars or gaming or photography or other hobbies. But it's rare to find a person so uninterested in music that they can't converse on the topic at even a superficial level, even if all they hear is what's playing on the radio at work.

    Second, it's a safe topic of discussion. It's not religion or politics, and it's even unlikely to segue into those topics.

    So "when you first meet people," it makes sense that it's a popular topic of conversation. You have a high likelihood of actually being able to converse, and a low likelihood of pissing people off.

  42. for the same reason music is useful in religion by thegnu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    music is directly emotional in a way that movies aren't. it's also highly interpretive, so WHY someone likes something is as important as what they like. it reveals how deeply they think about that certain part of themselves that is ecstatic and interpretive.

    there are very valuable emotions communicated by very shoddy musicianship. there are very bland emotions communicated by overproduced garbage. the conglomeration of what people like is telling at least of what they're going through at the moment.

    it tells you if they're into ecstatic fun stuff, if they're into sad stuff, angry stuff. music is cathartic and healing, and it shows you what the person needs. it can be revealing if they view it as entertainment, or just background noise.

    the kiss of death for me is, "I like all music," um... like what? "Oh, I listen to everything," and what are some bands you like... "[billboard top 5]" if people like music I don't like, but like it for a reason, and are interested in it, then I'm fine with that. but then, I'm a musician. when people ask me about painters, I say the same thing. :-)

    that's my opinion anyway.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  43. Music Is Universally Enjoyed by Petersko · · Score: 2, Informative

    People might enjoy a wide variety of music, or they may have narrow tastes. But I've never met anyone who hated all music.

    I know people who hate television and movies, calling them "useless time-wasters". I know people who don't like ice cream and hate dogs. I even know somebody who hates nearly everybody else. But music is different. Some people don't notice it much, but even they know what they like.

    People know that their musical choices are very personal. If you ask what kind of music they like, they get a chance to talk about themselves. And many are proud of their musical taste. It's like fine wine. Some people are connoiseurs, and some just drink whatever is available. And a wine expert generally just LOVES to talk about wine.

    For anybody who thinks that showing disdain for some form of music somehow increases their credibility on the subject, remember this: nothing turns off somebody else faster than saying their favorite band/artist sucks.

    1. Re:Music Is Universally Enjoyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People might enjoy a wide variety of music, or they may have narrow tastes. But I've never met anyone who hated all music.

      I'm deaf, you insensitive clod.

  44. it's networking, stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to learn the name of a band is to have a real, live human being tell you it. This isn't true of clothing brands, of film or television, of interests or hobbies, of favorite authors or magazine subscriptions. I guarantee that if someone on Slashdot mentions 3 bands "as examples" of bands, it tells you more about that person than it does about the bands. This isn't true for anything else.

    Diet Coke, Snapple, Gatorade.

  45. Re:My deepest darkest seceret by ironring2006 · · Score: 1
    Hey, I don't want to sound queer or nothing, but I think Depeche Mode is a kick-ass band!

    ...Orgazmo

  46. Everyone likes something by Takehiko · · Score: 1

    Music is a great conversation piece because everyone likes some kind of music. No matter if you're male or female, rich or poor, smart or stupid, you have to like some kind of music. "What kind of music do you like?" is a safe question that everyone will have an answer to. As opposed to something like politics that the other person may have no idea about or could potentially be offended by your own view points.

  47. The great communicator by the+dark+hero · · Score: 1

    Music can make or break a relationship. It's always an easy topic to start off with because everyone listens to music. If you don't you're either deaf or very boring and even deaf people like to "listen" to bass lines. People find it easy to discuss their musical tastes so its an efficient ice breaker. However, deeper psychological connotations of musical taste differs greatly from person to person.

    --
    You constantly struggle for self improvement - and it shows.

    Hooray for bad Engrish on fortune cookies

  48. Instant Agreement and Non-threatening by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    I've always been aware that when people get together they tend to talk about music, and it's always disgusted me. The reason it disgusts me is that they are not talking about music because they have really strongly felt preferences or something of interest to say but because you can always find someway to agree and the conversation topic is so bland it won't frighten anyone off. Music has two properties that make it so apt for this purpose.

    First of all it is all about preferences so it isn't intimidating like history, mathematics, science, religion or anything else with definite answers you could be wrong about. History might otherwise be a good topic to talk about at a party but it intimidates many people because they don't want to admit they don't know things nor turn out to say something and have it be wrong. Admittedly hipsters are pretty good at turning music into a similar sort of topic but if you are inclined to be friendly with someone there is nothing you *need* to correct them about as you might with history.

    Second of all the terminology and the classifications are sufficiently vague and deep that it is easy to subconciously twist your responses into agreement. I mean suppose she asks how you feel about rap, maybe you say something negative she can respond by saying, how can you not like so-and-so at which point you can clarify well their okay what I really dislike is Y or I don't know I've only heard Z type of rap. It might sound slimy but just listen to any two people who are meeting and want to like each other talking about music and you will see everyone tries hard to end up agreeing. Also since music is such a broad topic with various small preferences you will likely uncover SOME interest that you two have in common.

    I mean how the hell do you think we get so many people excited about the boy/girl they met b/c 'we both like band Y' or 'we both hate punk'.

    Music is a non-conversation. It is a way to make noises while avoiding actually saying anything of substance and that really annoys me. I want to know something about the personality of the people I meet not hear generic drivel. Sure one could talk about music reasonably that's what music critics and hardcore aficionados do but when they talk about it agreement isn't the normal course of business.

    --

    By the way "likes jazz" usually means "I want people to think I'm deep and intellectual." Now often that is correlated with really being an intellectual but that isn't what it indicates. I know this is tough to believe but what music you like is just a matter of taste, just like what food you like. Preferring fine french dining to burgers and beer may show you have spent time refining your pallet and indicate a certain social class but it doesn't say anything about being an intellectual, being smart or anything of the kind. Similarly with what music you like.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Instant Agreement and Non-threatening by logicnazi · · Score: 1

      Or maybe a better way of putting the point is that music is non-threatening and it is easy for you to trick yourself into agreeing with someone. There are so many bands that you probably feel 'ehh' about it isn't too hard to think you like them when the person your talking to clearly wants you to like them.

      Furthermore, once you've convinced yourself you like them you often will so it won't fall apart later.

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    2. Re:Instant Agreement and Non-threatening by ShorePiper82 · · Score: 1

      I think that in context of the study we are not talking about music as the definitive 'get to know you' conversation. The study wanted pairs to get to know each other for 6 weeks, so I expect the leading conversation starter to be music because it is an easy going topic. There is a small amount of social etiquette involved with your standard bar or party and taking a casual conversation in stride and not losing the other person's interest. The conversation is expected to gauge reactions from both people without providing too much information all at once (IF you are both interested in each other and the music conversation works, you may move onto another topic and learn another facet of that person's personality). In the rap scenario you imply that both people want to make the conversation work so they overlook the details of the conversation. Ulterior motives aside, I would have to say that those two people will continue to neglect details until conversation comes to a head into an argument or you no longer find the other person interesting and realize that one or both of you aren't compatible in the simplest of conversations. On the flip side: you can't reasonably expect to walk into a bar/pub environment (sake of argument/social gathering) and start spouting theories on mathematics and get as far as you would at say, an engineering convention. A previous girlfriend of mine happened to be a mathematics major (and myself a minor), so we actually managed to talk mathematical theories from time to time and found the conversations interesting... the catch? music was one of the earlier topics, once we exhausted that we used education and things went pretty smooth... i think that by talking about music you just get a very general feel for the other person... but I agree that although the information is inconclusive... it is a great introductory conversation.

    3. Re:Instant Agreement and Non-threatening by Trendy.Ideology · · Score: 1

      I agree with almost all of this. I will point out one thing though; For those of us who do feel very strongly about certain types of music or bands, liking the same type of music is very important. I don't think I could get along with a girl who listened to say, hip hop, rap, or country. Country being the lesser of the three evils, because it's easiest on the ears, for the most part. The same goes for my friends. I actually don't have any friends that primarily listen to any of those three types of music. But yes, talking about music as an icebreaker is so freaking cliché. Everyone likes music. You might as well talk about enjoying breathing, or how good opposable thumbs are. People really need to find common ground with each other, that goes further than skin deep.

      --
      In the end, the only thing that matters is how much fun you had.
  49. Don't judge people by boristdog · · Score: 1

    Don't judge people by the music they listen to,

    Judge them by whether or not they try to force YOU to listen to it.

    I likes me some quiet time.

  50. The Onion has been at this for a while by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Onion has a feature called Random Rules. They take a celebrity type person and put their MP3 player on random. Then have the person being interviewed discusses what happens to come up on their player.

    It's actually a pretty good feature. I especially liked the one with Gerald Casale.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  51. Do they still have charts? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    Shows how out of touch I am. I don't know anyone who buys singles so I've no idea what "top N songs" could even mean.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Do they still have charts? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      people still buy singles off of iTunes, and there is a list of singles that are the most purchased.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    2. Re:Do they still have charts? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      So when people say "top 5" they mean the top 5 downloads from iTunes? But you can download any album track you want from iTunes. O they get counted too? And why iTunes? There are many ways to buy music. How do you aggregate them?

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  52. Ugh. by maxume · · Score: 1

    So which is which? T

    he person who listens to music he enjoys or the person who listens to music he enjoys telling other people he listens to?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  53. How do we get to know other people? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Well, there's that whole "talking" thing. Do people really need gadgets now to have a conversation?

  54. Country music Stable by lazlow · · Score: 1

    I thought Country Music caused incest.

  55. The Culture of Music The Sound of Music by WilliamCotton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, for one, knowing what kind of music someone else listens to is a great way to find out a lot of cultural similarities between yourself and them. Pieces of music seem to compact weeks worth of communication in to a short length of time. If you and another individual are in to the same obscure indie rock band, you're probably going to have a lot of cultural connections. The thing is, it's never really about the music. The non-musical aspects are much more important. How we first came to hear a certain piece, who told us about it, who else listens to it, when it was from, why it was made... all of these are more important than the chord structure, lyrics, melody, and form of the song or piece.

    IAAMusician, and let me be the first to tell you that coming to this realization was not easy at first, probably due to the fact that I had to first learn and internalize most of the fundamentals of music, which kept me focused on the structural aspects. That being said, I still have no idea what music is or why I enjoy to make or listen to it. I do know that most people refuse to believe that the reason they don't like rap music isn't because of the sonic structures or lyrical content of the music rather the fact that they cannot relate to the culture that is responsible for its creation. Most musicians I know refuse to believe this as well, and while I cannot even come close to proving my thoughts on this, I know that if it is not the most important aspect of music, it is at least partially true.

    For example, last night, I was coming back from a friend's place, and I took a cab, not the easiest thing to do right after the Superbowl ends, especially in New York City. I was lucky enough to get a cab almost right away. The driver, as usual, was minding his own business. He was listening to a type of ethnic music typically known as Hindustani, originating from the Northern parts of India, near the Pakistani border, but also closely associated to Bangalore. I'm pretty in to this kind of music, the vocal styles, the tablas, the sitars here and there. However, he was used to the fact that most white dudes would probably rather listen to classic rock and offered to change to a radio station of my choice. I told him that I was enjoying this music, and immediately, he sprung to life! He handed me the album case and started telling me all about who this guy was that had written the songs, who the singer was, and tons of other information about the music and the culture behind it. Apparently, it was all written by this man, Rabindranath Tagore, who my cabbie enthusiastically told me was the first person from Asia to win the Nobel Prize, AND, that he had written all of his work in his native language. He was overflowing with pride. Not wanting to be the cultural hog of the conversation, he grabbed another CD case from the front and passed it back. It was a compilation of the Greatest Love Songs, with stuff like Genesis, Fleetwood Mac, Foreigner, etc... He had grown fond of listening to an Adult Contemporary station here in NYC and bought some albums and he was really in to it! I told him that if he enjoyed these songs, he would love one of my favorite songwriters, Burt Bacharach. At the end of the journey we both exchanged information about the artists we had recommended to each other and completed our cultural exchange.

    So your musical preferences will have a direct relation to your cultural preferences. How all of this applies to todays hyper-culture, with it's multitudes of sub genres and opinions scattered left and right, I have no idea. I'm still trying to figure that one out. I wouldn't have a hard time believing that if two people are both into neo-industrial-hardcore-skate-ska that there would be enough of a cultural/personality match for them to make a good couple.

    So, no offense to all of you Julie Andrews fans out there, but the sound of music really doesn't seem to be as important as the culture of music.

    --
    I've always prefered a command line interface. GUIs are such a cursory way to interact with a computer.
  56. no music plz by negrace · · Score: 1

    So what should we talk about, normal people, who like not to hear any of that weird shitty noise that you call "musik" while thinking/working/slacking ? :)

  57. Similar tastes matter by the_womble · · Score: 1

    I prefer books. Not only will I talk about books, but the first thing I will do on visiting someone for the firt time is look at their book shelves.

    A lot of my friends have overlapping taste in books - and I have often discovered this after making friends. Presumeably the same applies to music.

  58. No music personality by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Country is for emotionally stable and jazz is for intellectuals. Hmmmm. Tell me please, dear psychologists, what is my personality if I don't listen to any music at all?

    1. Re:No music personality by excelblue · · Score: 1

      IANAP, but a good guess would probably be absurdist?

      Maybe you don't have a personality. You're just a robot trapped inside a bag of meat. :P

  59. None? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if you don't listen to music?

  60. Jazz is deep and intellectual? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I translate "likes jazz" as laziness or "I like auditory mobeius strips of wandering saxaphones."

    And the Italians utterly pwn the French in dining. French cuisine is for people who have decided they hate food, and that meals must be an ordeal to be endured rather than enjoyed.

    Hey, mod me +5 in-tuh-lektual, baby! :-P

  61. Does not work for Classical by wabbit3.0 · · Score: 1

    Telling people you like classical is usually enough to end any conversation.

  62. Hey baby, are you alliance or horde? by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they can't answer "What level is your character?" without flinching, it's DATE OVER.

    1. Re:Hey baby, are you alliance or horde? by Kiliana · · Score: 1

      Screw that. "Do you prefer AD&D 2nd Edition, or 3rd(d20)?" is the make or break question for me. If he answers 3rd, he's got no chance in hell.

  63. Too bad for those who don't listen to music much by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even though I sing in a church choir, I don't listen to music much, and I don't own any kind of personal music player, except for my old Walkman, gathering dust in the back of a drawer somewhere. When I have the radio on in the car, it's either talk radio, a book on tape or a lecture on tape (currently 9 hours into a 15-hour seminar on Dante's "Comedia").

    I'm very knowledgable about art, history, literature, science, religion, politics, cooking, gardening, hunting, woodworking, and a jillion other things. I like to learn about things that interest other people, and I like to talk about things that interest me. I can hold a conversation and engage in a discussion with someone who holds a different viewpoint, without being disagreeable or opinionated. I have a lot of interests, but music isn't one of them.

    But because I don't listen to music, the most obvious middle ground is closed to me. I have no idea who any of the big music stars are these days, and do not recognize a hit tune when it is played for me. Even worse, when I say, "I don't listen to music.", it's assumed that I am a completely uninteresting shlub who's leisure hours are filled with TV sitcom reruns.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  64. Music and Personality by logicnazi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't surprise me that what music you like correlates with certain personality types. However, I think the assumption that people are making, that what music you like reflects something deep about you, is totally bullshit.

    Musical preferences, like many other preferences, are formed as much by associations and practice as anything else. Often we might not like something at first or be neutral to it but then when your friends keep putting it on you associate it with good times (or just by repetition) and start to like it. One reason that our musical preferences say things about us is that it reflects on who are friends were and what sort of environment we grew up in. Another reason is that these very societal stereotypes affect what music we are likely to be open to liking.

    For instance I know several people who weren't particularly into jazz (never really listened to it at all) but they view themselves as intellectuals and having heard that jazz is so complex and deep if you only know how to listen to it they decided to start listening to jazz. Of course they eventually started to get into but I think they could have done the same thing with Britney Spears if they had honestly believe that the music was really deep and complex.

    In other words how we feel about music is often just a reflection about the societal stereotypes we have about that sort of music.

    If you don't believe me try and think of how many people you know who claim to hate country music who have ever given it a really fair chance? Same with rap. However, pick a song they think they 'should' like and they will give it a much better chance. Particularly with rap and country our likes/dislikes have a lot to do with our attitudes to social class.

    I know many people won't believe me because it very much *feels* like you are responding to something in the music. However, just think about how strong the placebo effect can be and how good we are at tricking ourselves and ask whether this is a plausible explanation.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Music and Personality by WilliamCotton · · Score: 1

      While I do agree with you (see my previous post), I don't think you need to be as cynical about the issue as you are.

      Of course people are actually responding to something in the music. There is more at work than just mere cultural preference. If this were not the case, then everyone would be writing great music all of the time. At the very core of music is a number of important structures, structures that break through cultural barriers. Most of the musical systems of tuning and harmony on the planet are based around an importance of Perfect 5ths and Octaves (Indonesian Gamelan is a system that is not, and I've always been very intrigued by this kind of music). From the Blues, to Hindustani, to Chinese opera, to Baroque, there are mathematical congruences in their systems of harmony. Rhythms across various types of music tend to have similarities as well. Obviously, the importance of these characteristics change with the fashions of the time, regardless of culture, but there are elements that unite them all.

      You might be inclined to bring up the progression of the system of tuning used in Western music, from Pythagorean, to Just, to Well-tempered, and finally ending up at Equal-tempered, but all of these systems were attempts to deal with two competing forms of structuring harmonic systems, those aimed at progressions of the cycle of fifths, and those aimed at equal ratios between various notes. It is very interesting that despite all of the surface differences between various genres and sub-genres, almost all popular music made today in the Western world is based on Equal-tempered music with a 4/4 time signature, going beyond just these core features and sharing chord progressions, grooves, and even melodic structure.

      Now, if you're the kind of person who gets very interested in stuff like this, regular old pop songs can get pretty boring. You want to start dealing with all of this intellectual stuff. Well, people have been doing that since time began, hence the presence of more academic or intellectual types of music. Personally, I very much enjoy Jazz and other types of modern intellectual music because my brain yearns for stimulation from music. The standard chord progressions do not excite me anymore. I can sit down at a piano and entertain myself if I want to hear the same old vi-ii-V-I progression with some melody over the top. When I'm listening to something like Giant Steps from John Coltrane, my mind is electrified! The massive amount of musical ideas in there is absolutely stunning. His theoretical approaches and development of new harmonic progressions such as the Augmented cycle are incredibly stimulating. Sure, this is music for musicians, I understand that. I don't judge people based on the fact that they like or dislike Jazz. I know that it can sound like a bunch of notes flying all over the place with no sense of structure or meaning. I'm not going to get hung up on Jazz though. There are many other types of thoughtful or mindless or heartfelt approaches that I very much enjoy.

      What I will never do is deny someone their right to enjoy music in their own way. I'd rather try to learn about their understanding of this art form in order to increase my understanding of it. It has been a long journey, and the more I head down this path, the longer the path gets.

      --
      I've always prefered a command line interface. GUIs are such a cursory way to interact with a computer.
    2. Re:Music and Personality by Virgil+Tibbs · · Score: 1

      Musical preferences, like many other preferences, are formed as much by associations and practice as anything else. Often we might not like something at first or be neutral to it but then when your friends keep putting it on you associate it with good times (or just by repetition) and start to like it. This can also be applied more broadly; for instance, when I was young and stupid, I had never come across any alternative to MS Windows. I had never heard of open source and thought free software was always synomonous to freeware.

      To add further to insult I genuinly believed other people were being 'nasty' and deserved to lose for sueing MS for bundling IE with Windows. When you grow older (slightly) and get a much wider viewpoint, its much easier to see through the bad 'pop/indie/rock' where every new band seems to claim will make their mark on modern culture, just to be wiped out by the next wave of similar, yet not the same groups of twenty-somethings. One thing that irritates me is the the constant airplay, major radio stations(I live in the UK, so I'm using Radio One as an example) will have a playlist of 20 songs (if you are lucky),
      Semi- Independant, smaller radiostations(like X FM) have a playlist of 30 songs.

      15 of the songs in both playlists are the same.

      --
      www.tdobson.net #### Dare to Dream #### blog.tdobson.net
    3. Re:Music and Personality by g00z · · Score: 1

      I assure you sir, there is nothing deep or complex to be found in Britney Spears' music, no matter how much it is listened to.

      --
      "The Wright brothers were the first to fly with a heavier-than-air machine, but boy did they have a lousy plane"
    4. Re:Music and Personality by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      You must be right. I decided I needed to save money spent on buying CDs. So I made a CD with nothing but a 75 minute continuous 440Hz tone on it. I tried really hard to get into it and eventually I did. I can listen to this CD all day long and really get into it. Why bother with harmony and rhythm and all that? These are just societal stereotypes about how music should be. I gave them up and now I spend no money on CDs. And if I want some variety I burned a 466Hz CD too - though I haven't yet felt the need to play it.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:Music and Personality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=she+thinks+my +tractor's+sexy

      that's really all i have to say about Country/Western music

      It's a split between my dislike of the singing style in general and my dislike of the lyrics again, in general.

      The list of music that most people actively dislike is probably very small.

  65. Because Simpsons references don't always work... by lonechicken · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...As an icebreaker. Classic moment is when Ralph Wiggum is walking with Lisa and he didn't have anything to say, so he said, "So... do you like... stuff?"

    I have this theory that all things in life can be referenced by something on Simpsons, Futurama, or Family Guy. So like an idiot, I tried testing this theory once, with an actual pro football cheerleader I was out on a date with. (Yeah, wrong time to test that theory).

    We had things to talk about, but when a moment of dead silence came, I did the Ralph act, "So... do you like... stuff?", and she gave me a WTF look. Yep, I quickly moved onto music and other safe topics.

  66. Don't know if I buy it. by evilnaturedrobots · · Score: 1

    Most people don't know what to say to me when I tell them my two favorite genres are bluegrass and doom metal.

    1. Re:Don't know if I buy it. by pregister · · Score: 1

      Really? I guess I'd start with, "I hope you get hit by a truck and die choking on your own blood...out back, in the bayou, tonight."

  67. Figure this out by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    Judas Priest
    Yello
    Boston
    Mozart
    Blue Man Group
    Green Day (the original stuff)

    Yeah, go ahead. Just TRY to put me in a category.

    Someone's musical tastes can only give you so much information about someone. The only way to know what a person is really like is to spend time with them.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Figure this out by scoser · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you have multiple personalities?

    2. Re:Figure this out by rozz · · Score: 1

      Judas Priest
      Yello
      Boston
      Mozart
      Blue Man Group
      Green Day (the original stuff)

      Yeah, go ahead. Just TRY to put me in a category.

      eclectic .. and kind of pretentious
      see.. there is a label for everything

      --
      "There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
  68. Re:Too bad for those who don't listen to music muc by DarkJC · · Score: 1

    Even worse, when I say, "I don't listen to music.", it's assumed that I am a completely uninteresting shlub who's leisure hours are filled with TV sitcom reruns.

    So wait, who's going to be the new fun guy then?

  69. Deaf? by Petersko · · Score: 1

    I'm deaf, you insensitive clod.

    Trust me. If you could hear it, you'd like it.

    Besides, even deaf people can dance if the bass is loud enough. You dance to a beat - not to a melody.

    1. Re:Deaf? by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      A running joke in my family is that some of the best gigs my dad's band had were at the local school for the deaf.

      I think they got a completely different take on the music by not being able to hear it, but instead feeling the beat. My dad says that he considers it the best praise of his drumming and the bass player's bass lines they ever got.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  70. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    say you like some crappy indie band in order to get inside a girl's pants


    But shouldn't first check if her pants fit you?

  71. For those that missed that joke: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:For those that missed that joke: by bfischer · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://poll.imdb.com/title/tt0080455/quotes "Oh, we got both kinds. We got country *and* western."

  72. Re:My deepest darkest seceret by duguk · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm gay and I dislike both Abba and Depeche Mode.

    Can we stop with the stereotypical generalisations now? :)

    DugUK

  73. I'll help by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    You could always explain the ideals of FOSS and the merits of the GPL.

    (if nothing else you'll get yourself out of having to do actual conversation)

  74. Hah! by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    And you call yourself the Fun Guy!;-)

  75. science != a personality by greg_barton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's completely absurd. Not everything is meant to be turned into cold science.
    What's absurd is ascribing emotional motivations to science. Science is not "cold." It just is. I could call it "warm, lovely science" and that would be just as valid.
  76. 1 in 10? by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From TFA: the MPAA documented 179 camcorded movies as the source for infringing DVDs since 2004. During that time, its members released approximately 1400 movies, suggesting that approximately one in every ten movies is camcorded and sold as infringing DVDs.

    Wasn't this supposed to be an article on bashing bogus statistics, or is 1400/179 = "approximately" 10 only when it suits our purpose?

    BBH

  77. The awful truth by sean_ex_machina · · Score: 5, Funny

    Latent craziness is inversely related to musical taste, or at least obscurity of musical taste. Look at the general lyrical ideas:

    Pop: "Something sad happened but I didn't let it get me down"
    Country: "Something sad happened but I'll get over it"
    Indie rock: "Something sad happened and I want to kill myself"
    Metal: "Something sad happened and I want to kill you"

    There's plenty of sad bastard country out there, but it's not what most people have in mind when they ask "what kind of music do you like?"

    1. Re:The awful truth by nuclearspike · · Score: 1

      you forgot:

      Punk: "Something sad happened and I want to kill us all"

    2. Re:The awful truth by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Rap: "Something sad happened and I want to kill a cop." Classical: "Buy these daimonds!"

    3. Re:The awful truth by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      Folk: Something sad happened to Johnny-o and then he sailed from Liverpool, never to return-o

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    4. Re:The awful truth by damista · · Score: 0, Troll

      Better still: Rap: "Something sad has happened and I want to kill a cop" Rap: "Something good has happened and I want to kill a cop" Rap: "Something phantastic has happened and I want to kill a cop" Rap: "Nothing has happened and I want to kill a cop" ... *SCNR*

  78. I married a woman because she likes Fugazi by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    She was a big fan of punk (like me) and had seen Fugazi several times. That was important to me.

    We disagree on some music though. She likes U2 and I don't. I like Aimee Mann and she doesn't.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  79. Oblig. "High Fidelity" quote by LostInTransportation · · Score: 1

    "What really matters is what you like, not what you are like. Books, records, films -- these things matter.'' -Rob Gordon

  80. Burt Bacharach by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while SomaFM's secret agent station plays some Burt Bacharach and I think "man, he's so underrated: this is *amazingly* good music." And, somewhere inside me, the last lingering echo of my 21-year-old self tries to commit suicide.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  81. Accidental connections by bohemian72 · · Score: 1

    I've been amused that my own music player has a list of songs lumped together that begin with:
    The Ashley Tisdale cover of Kiss the Girl.
    Linkin Park - Numb (The immediate consequence of kissing the girl, I guess)
    Joy Division - Love Will Tear Us Apart (The eventual consequence of said kissing)
    Marilyn Manson cover of Suicide is Painless (The ultimate consequence?)

    --
    The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return.
  82. LOL who listens to lyrics? I just hear the melody by spineboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Generally the only time I actual understand what the band is singing about, is when I'm just about tired of the song. Even then I really don't hear what they're saying most of the time. When I sang for my band, the lyrics usually changed a fair amount every time I sang the song. I did keep some of the words the same, just because of the way they sounded.

    If the words are the most important part of the song - then fine go listen to it, but you can drop the music part, since it's not the focus, and call it a poem, so I won't have to listen to it.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  83. Musical ?Taste? by onkelonkel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best quote I ever heard about music was in a discussion about pre-fab boy bands where someone said "I prefer real music. Music made by ugly angry men who write their own songs and play their own instruments."

    --
    None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
  84. Re:Because Simpsons references don't always work.. by e4g4 · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, how does someone with a nick like "lonechicken" get a date with a pro cheerleader? No offense intended...but c'mon, this is slashdot...

    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  85. Re:Because Simpsons references don't always work.. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, how does someone with a nick like "lonechicken" get a date with a pro cheerleader?

    Perhaps a person who chooses a handle like, "lonechicken" is a person who is not afraid of criticism? I don't want to speak for the previous poster since I don't know them, but on a related topic, when I left home and went to school at a huge engineering university I was amazed by how many guys there did not talk to women and yet complained about having trouble meeting people. There were three women for every guy at that school, but I never had problems meeting women, because 80% of the guys were too scared to talk to them. Just being confident enough to approach some girl is the largest hurdle many people face.

  86. Your sig by ngrier · · Score: 1

    --
    If you think you are loosing your rights, ask your self, has your life been altered since you lost them?


    <drum name="grammar" style="beat">
    One lets loose the dogs.
    One loses one's rights.

    Or to put it another way:
    If you loosen your grammatical standards enough, eventually you will lose the ability to speak coherently.

    </drum>

  87. Re:Because Simpsons references don't always work.. by lonechicken · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, how does someone with a nick like "lonechicken" get a date with a pro cheerleader? No offense intended...but c'mon, this is slashdot... Because it's easy for me to remember. I have enough passwords floating on various systems. I don't need a million usernames too.

    The date? She was a co-worker's sister. I suppose it's a quick lesson on how to get a date with a "hot chick" without having to go to a bar and get up the balls to approach someone at said bar. And also a lesson on how not to blow it by referencing something slightly geeky to try to get a laugh when you don't even know if she'd get it.
  88. Re:Too bad for those who don't listen to music muc by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    Even though I sing in a church choir, I don't listen to music much, and I don't own any kind of personal music player, except for my old Walkman, gathering dust in the back of a drawer somewhere.

    Even worse, when I say, "I don't listen to music.", it's assumed that I am a completely uninteresting shlub who's leisure hours are filled with TV sitcom reruns.

    I feel much the same, as an amateur musician, and I've noticed that musicians tend to value silence a lot more than music lovers do. It's partly a physical issue of saving your ears, and I also find that surrounding music interferes with my thinking of new musical ideas. Needless to say I don't use a portable music player, though I'm considering getting one with recording capabilities for quick and dirty field recording.

    You should be able to turn the situation to your advantage. People who like music tend to appreciate those who make music, even if they're completely off their preferred genre.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  89. That's funny by ratboy666 · · Score: 1

    I use my MP3 player to avoid saying "Hi" to anyone. But then, I am an anti-social bastard.

    For what it's worth (and it ain't much, but it may help identification of other anti-social bastards), here is what is on my MP3 player (artists only, it's probably weird enough):

    AC/DC, Elvis Presley, Etta James, George Thorogood, Holly Stell, Led Zepplin, Mozart, David Wilcox, Rolling Stones, Stray Cats, The Beatles, Leonard Cohen, The Ramones, Eric Clapton & JJ Cale, Violent Femmes.

    So, its only a 1GB player; mostly because I am a cheap anti-social bastard.

    If you hear of anyone with that playlist, I recommend you RUN AWAY. Because I probably don't want to talk to you, either.

    --
    Just another "Cubible(sic) Joe" 2 17 3061
  90. Icebreaker by SoulReaverDan · · Score: 1

    A lot of times talking about music makes it really easy to break the ice. In the instance of two people liking the same groups or style, they can immediately break into a discussion about favorite work or band, latest albums, where they get their music, etc. These conversations can branch onto others, but finding a stable common ground is important.

  91. 5) Are you going to ever use a question mark? by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

    Are you sure these weren't elementary school students?

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  92. Hi fidelity by ScooterBill · · Score: 1

    I always liked the line in Hi Fidelity by John Cusack:

    "It's not what she's like, it's what she likes that's more important"

    Peace

  93. Harrison Bergeron by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1
    So many people seem to feel that life needs a soundtrack, as though it were a movie in need of a an accompanying score. I just find that constantly having music on interferes with thinking, period.

    Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.
    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Harrison Bergeron by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      If only those people would contain their soundtrack to themselves on an iPod or something. But noooo, they have to put up their boomboxes (or even worse, their music playing mobile phones) on the friggin' train where people are sometimes trying to catch a quick nap.

      Or at the school I go to. Some of us appreciate a bit of quiet as we eat our lunches, but almost every single day some jerkwad will have his mobile phone turned all the way up, playing some god-awful rap tune through shitty tinny speakers. I asked one of them to turn it down one day, and he seriously threatened to break my nose if I didn't shut up and let him play his music. Luckily, I'm a big guy and the other guys in my class are too, so he never made good on his threat. I'd like to have seen him try, though.

      Apparently, you don't have the right to interfere with their music and how they're allowed to listen to their music everywhere they want to and as much as they want to. Obviously, their fragile little minds can't handle not being blasted with crap 24/7. Imagine the horror if they were to actually have room in their tiny heads to think.

      Personally, I love listening to music. I have a fairly good stereo system at home, and I do like my portable player for when the train rides get a little dreary and boring. But sometimes (a lot of times) what you really just need is a bit of peace and quiet. This will not coincide with other people's needs, which is why headphones and players that go both up and DOWN in volume were invented.

      People are getting more and more egoistical and intolerant, and that's a shame.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  94. can you like music you don't own? by louzerr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I forget exactly what I have rights to now - is it okay to like music you don't actually own, or can you go to prison for that?

    Just to be safe, I now hate all recorded music (at least if RIAA asks).

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
  95. Atari Teenage Riot, The Misfits, Ween by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    What does the list of my favorite 3 bands say about me?
    1. Atari Teenage Riot
    2. The Misfits
    3. Ween
    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  96. Mix CD? by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

    So, I made her a mix CD
    Shhhh! They'll hear you....
    RIAA steel-tip jackboots approaching
    --
    Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
  97. American Idol is the Litmus Test by thedbp · · Score: 1

    [partial sarcasm]

    All I have to do is ask a girl about American Idol.

    If they know any information at all about the winners, contestants, etc., they're off my list.

    So far its working out great - I don't have to listen to some mindless tart babble about unimportant bullshit before I f*ck them.

    Now if I could just get around having to pay them afterwards.

    [/sarcasm]

  98. Personality Types ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Music might be be a "safe" topic of conversation for most people
    and most people at least listen to "Something"

    I mean art and music are part of what defines "human"

    evolutionarily the point where our ancestors moved from being "just another great ape" to being "pre-human" could be defined as the point where they (we) began to recognise the beauty in things

    but notice I said "art and music"

    not all of us are "into" music
    I for one have a extremly visual personality http://rifraf.co.nz/
    I think in pictures not words

    I was intending to make a comment asking
    "what about other non auditory personality types ? what do they talk about?"
    but as I wrote this I realised that its really only auditory personality types who do 'talk about things'

  99. Re:My deepest darkest seceret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm gay and I dislike... Abba...

    If Waterloo does nothing for you, I'm afraid you're not gay.

  100. "So what music do you listen to!?" by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Is there anyone out there that finds this to be an incredibly boring / stupid / loaded question?
    Does that person want to go out sometime?

    I listen to music. If I had some way to say "give me a random sampling of the whole of music in the universe", I'd do that. Every now and then, I will listen to the same song repeatedly for several days.
    Reggae makes me naucious, but I'm pretty sure that's a physical reaction, not related to preference. Other than that, I will make the sweeping statement that people who like particular music are assholes.

    I like to listen to music. What kind? The kind with notes, rhythms, or sounds, you fuckhead.

    I hate the conversation, because when you just don't give a shit who is playing what kind of music you're listening to, there's not much to it.

    "What kind of music do you listen to!?"
    "Any of it. I usually prefer things that either doesn't have words or has words I don't understand, though that's more a statistic than something actively sought."
    "Yeah.. but.. what bands?"
    "I don't know."
    "What genre?"
    "I don't know."
    "Do you like coldplay?"
    "I have no idea. Is this coldplay?"
    "no"
    "Then I don't know."

    I own an Avril Lavigne CD. Somebody pointed that out once, so I thought I'd mention it.
    I bought it because every now and then I find music that I know to exist in stores, and I am in favor of supporting artists. I don't think I even bothered to play it. I already had some MP3s.

    I just pushed play on my ipod. I have no idea what the music is I'm listening to, but it sounds nice.
    It's a shuffle, so I don't know what it's called. (no screen)

    But everyone always hates the music I listen to. I think this is indian or bulgarian or something.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  101. Re:Because Simpsons references don't always work.. by pNutz · · Score: 2, Funny

    But when they do work, you know you may have found someone fantastic. My wife had "I Choo Choo Choose You" engraved on the inside of my ring. God I love her.

    --
    Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.
  102. Nothing by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    What is it about music that's so useful when we first meet someone and what kind of information can we extract from the music another person likes?

    Not a thing. You can't tell a damned thing about someone based on what kind of music they listen to, or what kind of books they like, or what their favorite color is. What you *can* do is form the basics of a relationship by, perhaps, establishing common ground, as you start to get to know someone. It's superficial and largely unimportant (unless one of you happens to be a musician), but that's how the beginnings of a relationship often are. It's not so much that music is an important or insightful discussion, per se, but rather that almost everyone likes music (except for me, I'm bored of it all), so it's a safe area for discussion. It's smalltalk, like the weather, current events, and celebrities.

  103. Wait.... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    Aren't we, as humans, driven and defined by all things that we choose to enter our life? We can do psychological surveys on favorite foods, clothes, costumes...paper or plastic?

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  104. Public Radio Listener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Music? I prefer CBC Radio One, NPR, BBC, that kind of thing: news, discussions with interesting people, ideas, politics.

    So does that make me a philistine, or am I just destined to be alone?

  105. NPR commentary by orgelspieler · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of this story on NPR. "How iMet My Neighbor on iTunes"

    If you can get past the iStalker factor, it's a pretty interesting listen.

  106. Myspace got it right by trveler · · Score: 1

    This is the main reason why myspace is the most popular social network. People explore the potential for friendship with others all the time on social networks, and the main focus of myspace is the music its users like. So, naturally, people will flock to the place that best supports socializing based on music.

    --
    ... is whot bwings os tugevza tsuzay.
  107. Re:LOL who listens to lyrics? I just hear the melo by bogjobber · · Score: 1

    If the words aren't important why not just sing the same melody but filled with nonsense, like scat? It's like saying you don't go to movies to follow the plot, you just want to see the pretty pictures.

  108. Barometer for Friendship by helver · · Score: 1

    I'm convinced that the single most important factor in defining your relationship with another person is shared experiences. The intensity and timeliness of those experiences determine how good a friend that person is at a particular moment in time. I think this explains why your High School friends are so vitally important to you in High School, but so meaningless ten years later. Or why war buddies from Vietnam or Korea still feel incredibly strong friendships for people they haven't seen or talked to in twenty five years.

    The point of this is that the experiment is flawed. The way you build a friendship with someone is by doing the things you do. That shared experience is what the friendship is based on. Attempting to use conversation to build a relationship with someone else is a fundamentally flawed. You can never have a real friendship because you haven't had any shared experience that carries any significance or weight. The shared experience in this case is "I'm stuck in a room talking with this person that I don't know." Hardly the stuff of a meaningful friendship.

  109. Musical tastes by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

    I can identify a number of influences on my musical tastes:

    1) Growing up, my mom listened to oldies. Even though I'm 32, I like the Monkees, Herman's Hermits, Jim Croce, Mamas and the Papas, and a lot of other music from the 50s and 60s. She also would listen to country, and I still like a number of old country songs.

    2) I didn't start listening to other music until I was probably in the 8th grade (about 13 years old). I started with Guns N Roses and Def Leppard's Hysteria. I like hard rock, but never really got into metal. Although some of the music I listen to is (or was) quite popular, not all of it is. I tend to only like one or two songs by any particular artist, much less a whole album.

    3) When I was a little older, I had an exchange student from France who stayed for a month during one summer. He had some tapes from a singer, Francis Cabrel, which I enjoyed a lot. After he returned home, he sent me the tapes. I eventually bought all of Cabrel's CDs. Also, in high school French class we had an audio program called "Champs Elysees". My teacher let me dub all the songs onto a tape. Due to the modern wonders of the Internet, I have managed to download them all so I can hear them again. (My original tape got eat in the cassette player years ago.) I listen to a lot of music in French that, if it were in English, I probably wouldn't.

    4) I tend to be very verbally oriented. I like music mainly for the lyrics. Songs with long instrumentals or over ornamented musical structures (like jazz) don't appeal to me very much. (Although hearing Liane Foly's smoky voice in "Au Fur et a Mesure" is quite sensuous.) Still, lyrics are vital to me liking a song. It doesn't matter if they're smart, funny, silly, bizarre, or whatever. If I can't connect with the lyrics, forget it.

    5) I have an odd sense of humor. I tend to find surreal or silly things very funny, so I'm also drawn to that kind of music as well. They Might Be Giants, Weird Al, Jonathan Coulton, Da Vinci's Notebook / Paul and Storm, MC Hawking, and so on...

    6) I didn't listen to a lot of music in the 80s that my wife, who is a little older than me, did. She has TONS of mp3s and has introduced me to an entire "new" style of music over 20 years after it was popular.

    Funnily enough, if I'm talking to someone I don't know, I'm probably not going to mention music unless they seem odd enough to enjoy a song about the Mandelbrot Set or something similarly strange. I don't use music to find out about people as much as confirm what I already suspect. It's probably because I don't listen to a lot of music, I'm not really familiar with anything outside the stuff I already like, and I'm not typically willing to invest the time in finding anything new; I wait for new stuff to come to me.

    I have better ways than talking about music to get a feel for someone's personality.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  110. I would have interrupted him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when he said he "moved those rocks so they looked like they had fallen there." I mean, where would they have fallen from? Having them look like they've fallen from someplace, unless there's a cliff behind his house, might make them seem rather unnaturally out of place. Falling from somewhere implies there was something, at one time, above them from which they would have fallen -- like a wheelbarrow or dump truck, although there's a slim chance they could have been a glacial erratic, meteorite, or volcanic bomb (although the first one would require it to be someplace where there could be glacially rafted debris, the second one seems rather improbable, and the last one implies the presence of a nearby volcano).

    I don't make friends very easily.

  111. Re:Too bad for those who don't listen to music muc by Stormie · · Score: 1

    Even though I sing in a church choir..
    Wow, it's true, you really can extract information and form opinions about people by talking about music!
  112. Mod Parent Down by Riktov · · Score: 1

    -1, Pretentious Musician

  113. insightful? by More_Cowbell · · Score: 1

    OK, why was he modded insightful? Clearly this was intended as a humorous post... (or the modders are clearly not from America) :P

    --
    Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    1. Re:insightful? by volpe · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm can be insightful. (So can pointing out what qualifies as insightful... Mods take note. :))

    2. Re:insightful? by Bassman59 · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm can be insightful. (So can pointing out what qualifies as insightful... Mods take note. :)) I guess there's no emoticon for facetiousness!
  114. Everybody likes music. by WK1 · · Score: 0

    Everybody likes music. Some like it more than others, and we all have our individual tastes, but it isn't like talking about computers, or bicycling, or cars, where some like it, and some don't. You can get a lot more info from "What kind of music do you like?", rather than, "Do you like computers?"

  115. May I make a suggestion? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    C**L

    Pop: "Something SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD happenennnnnnd but I didn't let IT get me dowwwwwwwwwwwn. I'm picking daisies and petting the clown"

    Country: "Somethin' sad hap'nd buht aye'll git over it if'n drink enough down."

    Indie rock: "Something sad happened and I went and killed myself. *static*" -wins award- -useless profit-

    Metal: "Something *explitive* *explitive* *explitive& sad *explitive* *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA* *WWWWWWWWWWWWW* happened and *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA* I want to *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA* I want to *AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
    I
    want
    to
    kill
    all
    of
    you
    *explitive* "

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  116. test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    test 123

  117. study was done in Austin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to an article in Fortune last fall, which quotes the authors of the study, the project was conducted at University of Texas.

    http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_arc hive/2006/11/27/8394347/

  118. Re:My deepest darkest seceret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit! I'll bet you watch Gilmore Girls, too, ya fairy!

  119. Music, Playlists, & Social Networking by CodeManBob · · Score: 1
    Albeit a pedestrian study, does it not ring true to everyone? Those with whom you share interests are those with whom you have more connectivity. Think about it.

    I found a website based on this very idea, social networking where playlists point you to people with similar interests. Check out http://www.playlistplay.com/.

  120. Some movies are like that by spineboy · · Score: 1

    But, I usually go to the movies for the plot/story, not for the explosions. Although Jurassic park, and a few others really didn't need any dialogue. It would have been just as good to see the dinosaurs run around for 80 minutes or so.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.