I was complaining about the fact that even the most insignificant abuse and misuse of authority these days brings out "Hitler" and "Nazi" comments. It only serves to dilute the gravity of what happened during that period in history, IMO.
You completely misinterpreted my post. You, sir, are worse than Hitler.
How do your browser and OS stats compare? On my site it appears that many Windows users are using Firefox (or something other than IE, at least). For October 2004 I have:
Operating Systems: Windows 86.6 % Unknown 6.3 % Linux 5.5 % Macintosh 1.1 %
Browsers: MS Internet Explorer 70.2 % FireFox 12.2 % Mozilla 7 % Opera 2.2 % Safari 0.7% Konqueror 0.7%
Have you tried capturing raw 802.11 frames with NdisWrapper? (Hint: Most Windows drivers don't support this, since NDIS doesn't provide a standard interface for it. Most Linux and FreeBSD drivers do.)
The problem is that NAT breaks the interconnectedness of the Net. If two machines are NATed (and on different networks), they can't talk directly to each other.
In many circles (e.g. corporate intranets, data centers, my house) this is a feature. Putting a policy enforcement point (aka a firewall) between your network and the rest of the Internet keeps bad things from coming in and ensures that your users are using the network properly.
Can we please change the configuration syntax from the bug-ugly iptables/ipchains style to something like the more human-readable styles that pf, ipfilter and the PIX use? Please?
It'll cause problems in smaller environments too, if your goal is to replicate data offsite. The FAQ says that there might be a version that runs over UDP in the future. In the meantime you get to use bridging (yay!) if you want to move data to a different segment.
Slashdot Mirror
You completely misinterpreted my post. You, sir, are worse than Hitler.
Firing the staff of a niche cable network is a "Hitler move"? How did this get modded +5?
You can add Ethereal to the list. We switched over a few months ago using cvs2svn.
Isn't that like being fairly pregnant?
How do your browser and OS stats compare? On my site it appears that many Windows users are using Firefox (or something other than IE, at least). For October 2004 I have:
Operating Systems:
Windows 86.6 %
Unknown 6.3 %
Linux 5.5 %
Macintosh 1.1 %
Browsers:
MS Internet Explorer 70.2 %
FireFox 12.2 %
Mozilla 7 %
Opera 2.2 %
Safari 0.7%
Konqueror 0.7%
Speaking of which, the space.com picture of Brian Binnie looks a lot like Ed Grimley.
...except WEP actually stands for Wired Equivalent Privacy
So why don't you just use NTPd or OpenNTPd? And why aren't you using pool.ntp.org instead of picking on the poor, overloaded NIST servers?
...because real techies care nothing about getting the most bang for the buck, or making users happy?
...or you can just get an AP that supports Power over Ethernet.
After reading the quick reference, my first question was "Are Sharpies solvent-based?"
Does Linux support WPA yet?
- Didn't drive in the rain (wipers didn't work).
- Didn't drive on wet roads (bald tires).
- Didn't poke an appendage through the hole in the floorpan at speed.
- Held onto the driver's side door during right turns (it flew open).
- Kept a spare battery in the trunk.
- Kept a spare clutch and throwout bearing in the trunk.
Just a few simple precautions, and you were perfectly safe.Have you tried capturing raw 802.11 frames with NdisWrapper? (Hint: Most Windows drivers don't support this, since NDIS doesn't provide a standard interface for it. Most Linux and FreeBSD drivers do.)
Sure it does. It's called "bash".
He appears to be bashing Microsoft because UNIX Services for Windows is faster than Cygwin. Pretty lame.
The problem is that NAT breaks the interconnectedness of the Net. If two machines are NATed (and on different networks), they can't talk directly to each other.
In many circles (e.g. corporate intranets, data centers, my house) this is a feature. Putting a policy enforcement point (aka a firewall) between your network and the rest of the Internet keeps bad things from coming in and ensures that your users are using the network properly.
Yeah, but with Apache's wildcard entries you only have to do it once.
Can we please change the configuration syntax from the bug-ugly iptables/ipchains style to something like the more human-readable styles that pf, ipfilter and the PIX use? Please?
It'll cause problems in smaller environments too, if your goal is to replicate data offsite. The FAQ says that there might be a version that runs over UDP in the future. In the meantime you get to use bridging (yay!) if you want to move data to a different segment.
Behold the power of cheese!
Probably not. Would they be delivering value to their investors by giving them back? Definitely not.
I'm confused. Is he trolling Mac lovers or apostrophe abuse haters?
Compared to anything Dell puts out, Sun is high-end.